Case Study Texas A&M: A Strategic
Approach to Your Deferral Rate
         Presented by: David Kadamus, President & CEO - Sightlines




                                                                     1
Impact of Scrubbing and Adding Projects
Original $1.6 billion FCA inventory scrubbed to $720 million

                                                             The Scrubbing Process:
                                                               • Segregated very large projects into
Descriptive text goes here                                       repairs, component replacement or full
          $1.7
                                                                 system upgrade.
                   $1.5                                        • Reassessing project timeframes
                                                               • Separated E&G from Auxiliary projects
                                                               • Interviews with the facility managers
                   $1.3
                                                                 and selected Deans to reconcile major
      $ Billions




                                                                 building needs with program directions.
                   $1.1

                   $0.9
                                                                                Baseline
                                                                                           $0.720
                   $0.7

                   $0.5
                          Beginning FCA       Scrubbed Out            New Projects   Current 10 Year
                            Inventory            Projects               Added          Inventory

     Scrubbed Out projects included projects beyond 10 years and auxiliaries

                                                                                                           2
                                                                                                           2
Summary of the E&G project inventory
Projects by Category


      The Total $720 Million Need by Timeframe
Descriptive text goes here


                                 C (8 to 10
                                Yrs.), $167 ,
             B (4 to 7 Yrs.),       23%
              $364 , 51%


                                A (0 to 3 Yrs.),
                                 $189 , 26%




       All Projects were codified by:
            • Timeframe
            • Capital Investment Category
            • Investment Criteria
            • Building Portfolio

                                                   3
                                                   3
Tools to Explain the Need

All Projects were codified by:
     • Timeframe
Descriptive text goes here
     • Capital Investment Category
     • Investment Criteria
                                                                             System
                               Row Labels                 Repair/Renewal Modernization Grand Total
                                 A (0 to 3 yrs)           $    98,092,902 $ 90,429,308 $ 188,522,211
                                   Reliability            $    43,907,861               $ 43,907,861
                                   Safety/Code            $    13,824,807               $ 13,824,807
                                   Asset Preservation     $    28,733,825 $ 66,505,273 $ 95,239,098
                                   Program Improvement    $    11,626,409 $ 23,924,035 $ 35,550,444
                                 B (4 to 7 yrs)           $ 280,086,430 $ 84,213,291 $ 364,299,722
                                   Reliability            $    79,240,171               $ 79,240,171
                                   Safety/Code                             $ 37,146,965 $ 37,146,965
                                   Asset Preservation     $ 172,804,631 $       215,745 $ 173,020,376
                                   Economic Opportunity   $      4,327,942              $ 4,327,942
                                   Program Improvement    $    23,713,686 $ 46,850,581 $ 70,564,266
                                 C (8 to 10 yrs)          $    71,626,266 $ 95,044,077 $ 166,670,343
                                   Safety/Code                             $ 65,058,511 $ 65,058,511
                                   Asset Preservation     $    57,645,328               $ 57,645,328
                                   Economic Opportunity   $        548,324              $     548,324
                                   Program Improvement    $    13,432,614 $ 29,985,566 $ 43,418,179
                               Grand Total                $ 449,805,598 $ 269,686,676 $ 719,492,275


                                                                                                   4
                                                                                                   4
Understanding the Need By Portfolio

       $300
   Millions


       $250
Descriptive text goes here
       $200
       $150
       $100
        $50
         $-




              Reliability           Safety/Code            Asset Preservation
              Program Improvement   Economic Opportunity

                                                                                5
                                                                                5
Creating the Priority Process



           Total Project Inventory
                                             Define campus portfolios to
                Building Portfolio               reflect institutional
                                            mission, goals, functions, etc…

                                              • A = within 3 years
                   Timeframe                  • B = 4 to 7 years
                                              • C = 7 to 10 years

                                         Reliability; Asset Preservation;
                   Investment             Program; Safety / Code, and
                                                   Opportunity
                     Criteria        (savings, grants, impact, sustainability
                                                         )
                     Project                 Assigned by relationship to
                                              strategic plan, functional
                      Score                sustainability, new resources.
                                                 “Breaking the ties”
                    Project
                     Plan
                                                                              6
Recommendations From the Priority Process

                                                                     Setting The Base Investment Goal

                                                                                                            Deferral of
                                                                                                            Timeframe
                                                                                                             C, $143
                                                                  Recommended
                                                                  Investment, $5
                                                                        05


                                                                                                        Deferral of
                                                                 Recommended Recommended     Total      Transitional
    Prioirity                        Actions                         Action     Deferral*   Backlog    Projects, $72

   Priority 1   Reliability Issues                               $       107 $        -     $    107
                Safety Issues                                    $        44   $      -    $      44
                Transitional Portfolio                           $         3   $        72 $      75
                                   Sub Total                     $       154   $        72 $     226
   Priority 2   A Timetrame Issues Non-Transitional Portfolios   $       108   $      -    $     108
   Priority 3   B Timetrame Issues Non-Transitional Portfolios   $       231 $        -     $    231
   Priority 4   C Timeframe Legacy Projects                      $         12 $      -   $        12
   Priority 5   C Timetrame Issues Non-Transitional Portfolios   $       -    $      143 $       143
                                      Total                      $       505 $       215 $       720

                                                                                                                          7
Summary of Recommended Funding Plan




                                      8
Contact us:
insights@sightlines.com




                          9

Case study texas a&m a strategic approach

  • 1.
    Case Study TexasA&M: A Strategic Approach to Your Deferral Rate Presented by: David Kadamus, President & CEO - Sightlines 1
  • 2.
    Impact of Scrubbingand Adding Projects Original $1.6 billion FCA inventory scrubbed to $720 million The Scrubbing Process: • Segregated very large projects into Descriptive text goes here repairs, component replacement or full $1.7 system upgrade. $1.5 • Reassessing project timeframes • Separated E&G from Auxiliary projects • Interviews with the facility managers $1.3 and selected Deans to reconcile major $ Billions building needs with program directions. $1.1 $0.9 Baseline $0.720 $0.7 $0.5 Beginning FCA Scrubbed Out New Projects Current 10 Year Inventory Projects Added Inventory Scrubbed Out projects included projects beyond 10 years and auxiliaries 2 2
  • 3.
    Summary of theE&G project inventory Projects by Category The Total $720 Million Need by Timeframe Descriptive text goes here C (8 to 10 Yrs.), $167 , B (4 to 7 Yrs.), 23% $364 , 51% A (0 to 3 Yrs.), $189 , 26% All Projects were codified by: • Timeframe • Capital Investment Category • Investment Criteria • Building Portfolio 3 3
  • 4.
    Tools to Explainthe Need All Projects were codified by: • Timeframe Descriptive text goes here • Capital Investment Category • Investment Criteria System Row Labels Repair/Renewal Modernization Grand Total A (0 to 3 yrs) $ 98,092,902 $ 90,429,308 $ 188,522,211 Reliability $ 43,907,861 $ 43,907,861 Safety/Code $ 13,824,807 $ 13,824,807 Asset Preservation $ 28,733,825 $ 66,505,273 $ 95,239,098 Program Improvement $ 11,626,409 $ 23,924,035 $ 35,550,444 B (4 to 7 yrs) $ 280,086,430 $ 84,213,291 $ 364,299,722 Reliability $ 79,240,171 $ 79,240,171 Safety/Code $ 37,146,965 $ 37,146,965 Asset Preservation $ 172,804,631 $ 215,745 $ 173,020,376 Economic Opportunity $ 4,327,942 $ 4,327,942 Program Improvement $ 23,713,686 $ 46,850,581 $ 70,564,266 C (8 to 10 yrs) $ 71,626,266 $ 95,044,077 $ 166,670,343 Safety/Code $ 65,058,511 $ 65,058,511 Asset Preservation $ 57,645,328 $ 57,645,328 Economic Opportunity $ 548,324 $ 548,324 Program Improvement $ 13,432,614 $ 29,985,566 $ 43,418,179 Grand Total $ 449,805,598 $ 269,686,676 $ 719,492,275 4 4
  • 5.
    Understanding the NeedBy Portfolio $300 Millions $250 Descriptive text goes here $200 $150 $100 $50 $- Reliability Safety/Code Asset Preservation Program Improvement Economic Opportunity 5 5
  • 6.
    Creating the PriorityProcess Total Project Inventory Define campus portfolios to Building Portfolio reflect institutional mission, goals, functions, etc… • A = within 3 years Timeframe • B = 4 to 7 years • C = 7 to 10 years Reliability; Asset Preservation; Investment Program; Safety / Code, and Opportunity Criteria (savings, grants, impact, sustainability ) Project Assigned by relationship to strategic plan, functional Score sustainability, new resources. “Breaking the ties” Project Plan 6
  • 7.
    Recommendations From thePriority Process Setting The Base Investment Goal Deferral of Timeframe C, $143 Recommended Investment, $5 05 Deferral of Recommended Recommended Total Transitional Prioirity Actions Action Deferral* Backlog Projects, $72 Priority 1 Reliability Issues $ 107 $ - $ 107 Safety Issues $ 44 $ - $ 44 Transitional Portfolio $ 3 $ 72 $ 75 Sub Total $ 154 $ 72 $ 226 Priority 2 A Timetrame Issues Non-Transitional Portfolios $ 108 $ - $ 108 Priority 3 B Timetrame Issues Non-Transitional Portfolios $ 231 $ - $ 231 Priority 4 C Timeframe Legacy Projects $ 12 $ - $ 12 Priority 5 C Timetrame Issues Non-Transitional Portfolios $ - $ 143 $ 143 Total $ 505 $ 215 $ 720 7
  • 8.
    Summary of RecommendedFunding Plan 8
  • 9.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 The “scrubbing” process involved: Segregating very large projects into repairs, component replacement or full system upgrade. Reassessing the timeframe of the projects. Separating E&G building projects from auxiliaries that include housing and athletics. Interviews with the facility managers and selected Deans to reconcile major building needs and to obtain a general understanding of the program direction in the College.The result of the “scrubbing” process was a project inventory for E&G buildings and the campus grounds / infrastructure of $720 million. Over half of the original FCA projects identified were restructured, moved to “X” timeframe – beyond 10 years, or excluded because the project was for an auxiliary, athletic or housing facility.
  • #6 This slide details the needs by Building Portfolio and Investment Criteria. The Investment Criteria are:
  • #7 To define a plan that reflects campus goals and is affordable, the prioritization process requires that each project be codified as to the investment horizon, building portfolio, and the investment criteria. Timeframe. To understand the investment horizon for a project, we recommend that each project is assigned a timeframe for action - A is within 3 years, B is 4 to 7 years, and C is 7 to 10 years.Building Portfolio. Each building (or grounds / infrastructure) is assigned to a Building Portfolio. The portfolios can be strategic, functional, programmatic, geographic, or a combination of these attributes.Investment Criteria. The investment criteria helps decision makers understand the outcome or impact of a project. Each project is assigned to one investment criteria. There are 5 categories - “Reliability, Safety / Code, Asset Preservation, Program Improvement, or Opportunities.”