The document outlines the indicators used in Georgia's 2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) for elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools. It provides details on the content mastery, post-education readiness, and other indicators measured for each level. It also lists supplemental "Exceeding the Bar" indicators that schools can earn additional points for achieving.
Attitude of Students towards Integral Calculus through the Screening Examinat...ijtsrd
One thing that may affect the students’ perception of mathematics is the attitude of the students towards the subject. This study was conducted to assess the attitude of students towards integral calculus. The subjects of this study were the 94 second year students of the College of Engineering taking up BSAE, BSCE, BSEE and BSME who were enrolled in Integral Calculus. This group of students were a combination of the first timer and repeaters in Integral Calculus. This were the students who were not screened out from the screening examination conducted by the researcher. It employed the descriptive correlational method using the frequency counts, weighted means and analysis of variance.The instrument used in this study was the attitude scale. This instrument was administered to the students before the first screening examination and after the last screening examination.Results revealed that students have favourable attitudes towards integral calculus before and after the screening examination strategy. However, results also revealed that the profile of the students in terms of gender, number of times the student took the subject and the students’ performance on the prerequisite subject has nothing to do or did not influence the attitudes of the students towards the subject. Merewina Llanie A. Tapong | Benjamin D. Varela "Attitude of Students towards Integral Calculus through the Screening Examination Strategy" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-1 , December 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd37935.pdf Paper URL : https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/agricultural-engineering/37935/attitude-of-students-towards-integral-calculus-through-the-screening-examination-strategy/merewina-llanie-a-tapong
With the 2015 enactment of the bipartisan Every Student Succeeds Act, all states are required to adopt and implement college- and career-ready standards (CCRS) in English language arts and mathematics. Today, most states and the District of Columbia are implementing rigorous, comparable CCRS and assessing student proficiency in meeting those standards.
Despite this, significant challenges thwart the promise of CCRS as the foundation for grade-level proficiency and readiness for college and careers for all students. Chief among these is the limited availability of high-quality, aligned instructional materials and supports that educators need to effectively deliver CCRS-aligned curriculum. This PCG White Paper describes a multidimensional approach to address this challenge, focusing on the design and delivery of curriculum and instructional practices that align strongly with rigorous, comparable CCRS to maximize student engagement in standards-aligned content and skills.
To that end, PCG’s approach integrates 1) analysis of curriculum and instructional materials for evidence of alignment with college and career-ready standards, 2) guidance for the design of CCRS-aligned curriculum, and 3) guidance for the design and implementation of CCRS-aligned curriculum delivery.
Presentation by Iain Matheson to the 2nd International Conference of the International
Society for Child Indicators
4–5 November 2009, Sydney, Australia.
Michelle Annette Cloud, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis...William Kritsonis
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, PhD Dissertation Chair for Dr. Michelle Annette Cloud, PhD Program in Educational Leadership, PVAMU, Member of the Texas A&M University System.
Dr. Kritsonis Recognized as Distinguished Alumnus
In 2004, Dr. Kritsonis was recognized as the Central Washington University Alumni Association Distinguished Alumnus for the College of Education and Professional Studies. Final selection was made by the Alumni Association Board of Directors. Recipients are CWU graduates of 20 years or more and are recognized for achievement in their professional field and have a positive contribution to society. For the second consecutive year, U.S. News and World Report placed Central Washington University among the top elite public institutions in the west. CWU was 12th on the list in the 2006 On-Line Education of “America’s Best Colleges.”
Education Briefing Series K-12 Student Achievement Testing
Applied Analysis has been asked by the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce to examine various aspects of Nevada’s system of elementary and secondary education in public schools (“K-12”). Among the relevant issues is student achievement, as measured by various forms of testing required under federal and state laws. Although the vigorous debate over student achievement has been widely publicized in general terms, the labyrinth of reporting requirements and testing instruments is not well understood outside the K-12 education community. The ongoing controversy among educators as to the usefulness and accuracy of various tests in measuring desired skills and abilities is not treated here. Rather, this paper simply provides some recent historical background for today’s continuing interest in student proficiency at both state and federal levels, a brief description of several of the tests prominently discussed in Nevada today, and, where available, comparisons among states and among Nevada school districts.
Educating Youth in Short-Term DetentionTanya Paperny
Each year thousands of youth in America are uprooted from their schools and communities and sent to a juvenile justice detention center. The majority of these confined youth are there for nonviolent offenses, including technical violations, such as failing to complete treatment or violating probation. Even youth awaiting foster care placement can be placed in a detention center. Over the course of a year, we estimate between 90,000 and 170,000 youth spend at least one day in a short-term detention center, and over 40% are detained for more than a month.
While in these facilities, young people are entitled to the same educational opportunities that they would have in the outside world. However, there is little research or data about this population.
In “Educating Youth in Short-Term Detention,” we found that youth’s educational experiences in these facilities often compound, rather than alleviate, the challenges they face. They are commonly unenrolled from their home school once they are arrested, and while detained, youth often do not receive coursework aligned with their needs, nor do they receive credit for the work they complete. Moreover, once they’re released, youth face significant challenges reenrolling in school, so even a brief period in confinement can severely disrupt a youth’s education.
Merging a hybrid course with a fully online course.guestc503c25
To meet the different learning preferences of graduate nursing students within a single course a hybrid or blended option was offered alongside a fully online option. This pilot study examined the processes and outcomes of this effort.
Attitude of Students towards Integral Calculus through the Screening Examinat...ijtsrd
One thing that may affect the students’ perception of mathematics is the attitude of the students towards the subject. This study was conducted to assess the attitude of students towards integral calculus. The subjects of this study were the 94 second year students of the College of Engineering taking up BSAE, BSCE, BSEE and BSME who were enrolled in Integral Calculus. This group of students were a combination of the first timer and repeaters in Integral Calculus. This were the students who were not screened out from the screening examination conducted by the researcher. It employed the descriptive correlational method using the frequency counts, weighted means and analysis of variance.The instrument used in this study was the attitude scale. This instrument was administered to the students before the first screening examination and after the last screening examination.Results revealed that students have favourable attitudes towards integral calculus before and after the screening examination strategy. However, results also revealed that the profile of the students in terms of gender, number of times the student took the subject and the students’ performance on the prerequisite subject has nothing to do or did not influence the attitudes of the students towards the subject. Merewina Llanie A. Tapong | Benjamin D. Varela "Attitude of Students towards Integral Calculus through the Screening Examination Strategy" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-1 , December 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd37935.pdf Paper URL : https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/agricultural-engineering/37935/attitude-of-students-towards-integral-calculus-through-the-screening-examination-strategy/merewina-llanie-a-tapong
With the 2015 enactment of the bipartisan Every Student Succeeds Act, all states are required to adopt and implement college- and career-ready standards (CCRS) in English language arts and mathematics. Today, most states and the District of Columbia are implementing rigorous, comparable CCRS and assessing student proficiency in meeting those standards.
Despite this, significant challenges thwart the promise of CCRS as the foundation for grade-level proficiency and readiness for college and careers for all students. Chief among these is the limited availability of high-quality, aligned instructional materials and supports that educators need to effectively deliver CCRS-aligned curriculum. This PCG White Paper describes a multidimensional approach to address this challenge, focusing on the design and delivery of curriculum and instructional practices that align strongly with rigorous, comparable CCRS to maximize student engagement in standards-aligned content and skills.
To that end, PCG’s approach integrates 1) analysis of curriculum and instructional materials for evidence of alignment with college and career-ready standards, 2) guidance for the design of CCRS-aligned curriculum, and 3) guidance for the design and implementation of CCRS-aligned curriculum delivery.
Presentation by Iain Matheson to the 2nd International Conference of the International
Society for Child Indicators
4–5 November 2009, Sydney, Australia.
Michelle Annette Cloud, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis...William Kritsonis
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, PhD Dissertation Chair for Dr. Michelle Annette Cloud, PhD Program in Educational Leadership, PVAMU, Member of the Texas A&M University System.
Dr. Kritsonis Recognized as Distinguished Alumnus
In 2004, Dr. Kritsonis was recognized as the Central Washington University Alumni Association Distinguished Alumnus for the College of Education and Professional Studies. Final selection was made by the Alumni Association Board of Directors. Recipients are CWU graduates of 20 years or more and are recognized for achievement in their professional field and have a positive contribution to society. For the second consecutive year, U.S. News and World Report placed Central Washington University among the top elite public institutions in the west. CWU was 12th on the list in the 2006 On-Line Education of “America’s Best Colleges.”
Education Briefing Series K-12 Student Achievement Testing
Applied Analysis has been asked by the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce to examine various aspects of Nevada’s system of elementary and secondary education in public schools (“K-12”). Among the relevant issues is student achievement, as measured by various forms of testing required under federal and state laws. Although the vigorous debate over student achievement has been widely publicized in general terms, the labyrinth of reporting requirements and testing instruments is not well understood outside the K-12 education community. The ongoing controversy among educators as to the usefulness and accuracy of various tests in measuring desired skills and abilities is not treated here. Rather, this paper simply provides some recent historical background for today’s continuing interest in student proficiency at both state and federal levels, a brief description of several of the tests prominently discussed in Nevada today, and, where available, comparisons among states and among Nevada school districts.
Educating Youth in Short-Term DetentionTanya Paperny
Each year thousands of youth in America are uprooted from their schools and communities and sent to a juvenile justice detention center. The majority of these confined youth are there for nonviolent offenses, including technical violations, such as failing to complete treatment or violating probation. Even youth awaiting foster care placement can be placed in a detention center. Over the course of a year, we estimate between 90,000 and 170,000 youth spend at least one day in a short-term detention center, and over 40% are detained for more than a month.
While in these facilities, young people are entitled to the same educational opportunities that they would have in the outside world. However, there is little research or data about this population.
In “Educating Youth in Short-Term Detention,” we found that youth’s educational experiences in these facilities often compound, rather than alleviate, the challenges they face. They are commonly unenrolled from their home school once they are arrested, and while detained, youth often do not receive coursework aligned with their needs, nor do they receive credit for the work they complete. Moreover, once they’re released, youth face significant challenges reenrolling in school, so even a brief period in confinement can severely disrupt a youth’s education.
Merging a hybrid course with a fully online course.guestc503c25
To meet the different learning preferences of graduate nursing students within a single course a hybrid or blended option was offered alongside a fully online option. This pilot study examined the processes and outcomes of this effort.
1. 2013 CCRPI Indicators
• Indicators displayed in black are operational
for the 2013 CCRPI reports.
• Indicators displayed in green will be
benchmarked at the 95th percentile based on
state level data.
o Middle School and Elementary School indicator #7 will
be benchmarked at 65%
o Indicators displayed in red are not operational for the
2013 CCRPI reports.
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
October 11, 2013
All Rights Reserved
2. Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All of Georgia’s Students”
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index,
High School, Grades 9 - 12
CONTENT MASTERY
1.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Ninth Grade Literature End of Course
2.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the American Literature End of Course
3.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the
4.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the GPS Geometry (transitioning to CCGPS Analytic Geometry in 2013-2014
Course
of
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Physical Science End of Course
6.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Biology End of Course
7.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the US History End of Course
8.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Economics End of Course
POST HIGH SCHOOL READINESS
9.
Percent of graduates completing a CTAE pathway, or an advanced academic pathway, or a fine arts pathway, or a world language pathway within their
program of study
10. Percent of CTAE Pathway Completers earning a national industry recognized credential, or an IB Career-Related Certificate, or a passing score on a GaDOE
recognized end of pathway assessment (operational in 201411. Percent of graduates entering TCSG/USG not requiring remediation or learning support courses; or scoring program ready on the Compass; or scoring at
; or scoring 3 or higher on two or more AP exams; or
scoring 4 or higher on two or more IB exams
12. Percent
College, Advanced Placement courses, or International Baccalaureate courses
ACCEL, Dual HOPE Grant, Move On When Ready, Early College, Gateway to
13. Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Georgia High School Writing Test
14. Percent of students achieving a Lexile measure
Percent of EOCT assessments scoring at the Exceeds level
16. Student
GRADUATION RATE
17. 418. Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
All Rights Reserved
3. Exceeding the Bar Indicators
In addition to the eighteen (18) items within the College and Career Ready Performance Index, high schools
may earn additional points for these supplemental indicators.
1. Percent of graduates earning credit in a physics course
2. Percent of first time 9th grade students with disabilities earning 3 Carnegie Unit Credits in 3 core content areas (ELA, mathematics,
science, social studies) and scoring at Meets or Exceeds on all required EOCT
3. Percent of first time 9th grade students earning 4 Carnegie Unit Credits in 4 core content areas (ELA, mathematics, science, social studies)
and scoring at Meets or Exceeds on all required EOCT
4. School has earned a Georgia Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Program Certification
5. Percent of English Learners with positive movement from one Performance Band to a higher Performance Band based on the ACCESS for
ELLs
6. Percent of graduates completing a career-related Work-Based Learning Program or a career-related Capstone Project (includes IB
projects; moves to face of CCRPI in 2016-2017)
7. Percent of graduates earning 3 or more high school credits in the same world language (operational in 2013-2014)
8. Percent of teachers utilizing the Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS) (operational in 2013-2014)
9. School or LEA-defined innovative practice accompanied by data supporting improved student achievement: examples include but are not
limited to Charter System, Georgia College and Career Academy, Race to the TOP, Striving Reader initiative, dual language immersion
program, Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) and/or Mathematics Design Collaborative (MDC), Response to Intervention (RTI), Positive
Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS), local instructional initiatives, etc. Practice must be reported via the CCRPI Data Collection
application.
10. School or LEA-defined interventions or practices designed to facilitate a personalized climate in the school: examples include but are not
limited to Teachers as Advisors program; mentoring program; Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS); service-learning
program; peer mediation; conflict mediation. (operational in 2013-2014)
To be included after statewide implementation:
Percent of tested students scoring at a proficient level on a Soft Skills Assessment
School’s average score on the Georgia Teacher Effectiveness Measurement
School’s average score on the Georgia Leader Effectiveness Measurement
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
All Rights Reserved
4. Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All of Georgia’s Students”
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index,
Middle School, Grades 6 - 8
CONTENT MASTERY
1.
2.
3.
4.
POST MIDDLE SCHOOL READINESS
6.
Percent of English Learners with positive movement from one Performance Band to a higher Performance Band as measured
by the ACCESS for ELLs
7.
Percent
8.
Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Grade Eight Writing
9.
Percent of students in grade 8 achieving a Lexile measure equal to or greater than
day
10. Percent of students completing 2 or more state defined career related assessments/inventories and a state defined Individual
Graduation Plan by the end of grade 8
11. Student Attendance Rate
PREDICTOR FOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION
12. Percent of students in grade eight passing at least four courses in core content areas (ELA, mathematics, science, social
all CRCT and required EOCT
13. Percent of CRCT assessments scoring at the Exceeds level
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
All Rights Reserved
5. Exceeding the Bar Indicators
In addition to the thirteen (13) items within the College and Career Ready Performance Index, middle schools
may earn additional points for these supplemental indicators.
1. Percent of students earning a passing score in three middle school courses in the fine arts, or career exploratory, or world
languages by the end of grade 8 (courses must be in the same area of concentration)
2. Percent of students earning at least one high school credit by the end of grade 8 (ELA, mathematics, science, social studies,
world languages, fine arts, CTAE) and scoring at Meets or Exceeds on all CRCT and required EOCT
3. School has earned a Georgia Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Program Certification
4. Percent of students in grade 8 scoring proficient/advanced on the 21st Century Skills Assessment
5. Percent of teachers utilizing the Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS) (operational in 2013-2014)
6. School or LEA-defined innovative practice accompanied by data supporting improved student achievement: examples include
but are not limited to Charter System, Race to the TOP, Striving Reader initiative, dual language immersion program, Literacy
Design Collaborative (LDC) and/or Mathematics Design Collaborative (MDC), Response to Intervention (RTI), Positive
Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS), local instructional initiatives, etc. Practice must be reported via the CCRPI Data
Collection application.
7. School or LEA-defined interventions or practices designed to facilitate a personalized climate in the school: examples include
but are not limited to Teachers as Advisors program; mentoring program; Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS);
service-learning program; peer mediation; conflict mediation. (operational in 2013-2014)
To be included after statewide implementation:
School’s average score on the Georgia Teacher Effectiveness Measurement
School’s average score on the Georgia Leader Effectiveness Measurement
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
All Rights Reserved
6. Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All of Georgia’s Students”
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index,
Elementary School, Grades K CONTENT MASTERY
1.
2.
3.
4.
POST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL READINESS
6.
Percent of English Learners with positive movement from one Performance Band to a higher Performance Band as measured
by the ACCESS for ELLs
7.
Percent
8.
Percent of students scoring Meets or Exceeds on the Grade Five Writing
9.
Percent of students in grade 3 achieving a Lexile measure equal to or greater
10. Percent
day
achieving a Lexile measure equal to or greater
11. Percent of students in grades 1Georgia’s 17 Career Clusters
12.
PREDICTOR FOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION
13.
14.
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
All Rights Reserved
7. Exceeding the Bar Indicators
In addition to the fourteen (14) items within the College and Career Ready Performance Index, elementary
schools may earn additional points for these supplemental indicators.
1. Percent of students in grades 3 – 5 earning a passing score in above grade level core courses (ELA, reading, mathematics,
science, social studies) and scoring at Meets or Exceeds on all CRCT
2. Percent of students earning a passing score in world language courses or earning a passing score in fine arts courses
3. School has earned a Georgia Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Program Certification
4. Percent of fifth grade students with a complete career portfolio by end of grade 5 (moves to face of CCRPI in 2016-2017)
5. Percent of teachers utilizing the Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS) (operational in 2013-2014)
6. School or LEA-defined innovative practice accompanied by data supporting improved student achievement: examples include
but are not limited to Charter System, Race to the TOP, Striving Reader initiative, Early Literacy initiative, dual language
immersion program, Response to Intervention (RTI), Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS), local instructional
initiatives, etc. Practice must be reported via the CCRPI Data Collection application.
7. School or LEA-defined interventions or practices designed to facilitate a personalized climate in the school: examples include
but are not limited to Teachers as Advisors program; mentoring program; Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS);
service-learning program; peer mediation; conflict mediation. (operational in 2013-2014)
To be included after statewide implementation:
School’s average score on the Georgia Teacher Effectiveness Measurement
School’s average score on the Georgia Leader Effectiveness Measurement
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
All Rights Reserved