This document discusses pitcher irrigation, a simple and low-cost irrigation method that has been used for centuries. Pitcher irrigation involves burying unglazed clay pots filled with water near plants to provide controlled irrigation. It has been shown to be more efficient than drip irrigation and can allow crops to grow in difficult soils like saline soils. The document provides examples of crops that have been grown using pitcher irrigation in various countries and regions. It concludes that pitcher irrigation should be considered for areas with limited water supplies or unworkable soil/irrigation conditions, and may have potential for commercial use in some situations.

1. Pitcher Irrigation: Working Paper #1
Dry Lands Research Institute
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA 9252l
August, 1986 (3rd rev. May, 1987)
David A. Bainbridge
Small scale, low cost, simple methods of
irrigation for dry land agriculture have largely been
ignored in favor of large scale, expensive, and
complex systems even though the majority of the
World's dry lands are still farmed by small scale,
subsistence farmers. These farmers have been
neglected and even the traditional systems that could
be of great use to them have not been well studied or
publicized.
The pitcher or clay pot method is one of the more
effective systems for small scale irrigation. This
method has been shown to have higher water use
efficiency than drip irrigation but more
experimentation is needed to help farmers match
pitcher surface area and porosity to different crops,
climates, and soils.
The use of pitcher irrigation in China is described
in the book Fan Sheng-chih Shu (about 100 B.C.).
Current practices are virtually identical.
Make 53 pits in one tenth hectare, each pit 70 cm
across and 10 cm deep. To each pit add 18 kilograms
of manure. Mix the manure well with an equal
amount of earth. Bury an earthen jar of 6 liters
capacity in the center of the pit, Let its mouth
be level with the ground. Fill the jar with water.
Plant 4 melon seeds around the jar. Cover the jar
with a tile. Always fill jar to the brink if the water
level falls. (the book goes on to describe interplanting
onions or beans with the melons and suggests the
probable profit).
It is likely pitcher irrigation had been used for
some time before this description was published.
Pitcher irrigation is now used on a small scale in the
dry lands of India, the Middle East, and Latin
America. This method would probably be used more
widely if farmers and gardeners were aware of it. It
may also prove of value for landscaping and growing
vegetables or flowers in containers.
Pitcher irrigation uses a buried, unglazed
earthenware pitcher or pot filled with water to provide
controlled irrigation to plants near it. [Standard clay
garden pots are suitable for use if the bottom hole is
plugged.] Pitcher irrigation is effective with both
annual and perennial plants. Pitcher irrigation can
allow crops to be grown in saline soil where
conventional irrigation would not work, and have
been shown to provide a better environment for root
growth than drip irrigation in these difficult soils.
Pitchers are also likely to be of value in very coarse
sand or gravel where it is difficult to hold water in the
plant root zone. Experiments in India with tomatoes
suggest that pitchers may also be valuable when
irrigation with saline water is necessary. Tomato
yields were high with saline irrigation water, EC 10.2
mmhos/cm.
Pitchers are, or have been used to grow pistachio
trees in Iran, mesquite, acacia, and eucalyptus in
Pakistan, acacia in India, citrus in Brazil, and melons,
tomatoes, corn, and other annual crops in China,
Mexico, and Brazil. The yield for pitcher irrigated
melon in India was 25,000 kg/ha with 1.9 cm
water/hectare. Survival of tree seedlings irrigated with
pitcher irrigation was 96.5% compared to 62% for
hand watering and the height of pitcher irrigated
seedlings was 20% greater.
Pitchers are better than drip systems in some
respects. First, they are not as sensitive to clogging as
drip emitters, although they may clog over time (3-4
seasons) and require renewal by reheating the pots.
Second, pitchers can be made with locally available
materials and skills. And finally, the pitchers are less
likely to be damaged by animals or clogged by
insects. Pitcher irrigation allows soil amendments to
be placed where they will benefit crops most and the
precise water application minimizes problems with
weeds. The drawbacks of pitchers include increased
labor to make and install the system and less
flexibility once it is installed. Pitchers can either be
filled by hand if labor is inexpensive or connected to
a pipe network.
Pitcher irrigation should be considered in areas
where water supplies are limited or where soil or
1

2. irrigation water characteristics make traditional
irrigation systems unworkable. They will probably
prove most valuable in kitchen gardens and
subsistence farming but may be of commercial value
in some situations. The development of specially
designed porous capsules for irrigation may improve
the commercial feasibility of this method of
irrigation, see for example Silva et al. and Gischler
and Fernandez-Jauregui.
Acknowlegements:
With special thanks to Gene Anderson (UCR) for
his assistance with the Chinese literature and
translation, Steve Mitchell (UCR) for his help with
the literature and data bases, Luiz Ferreira (UCR) for
sharing his experiences with pitcher irrigation in
Brazil and translation of Portugese source material,
Mo Lahsaiezadeh for his comments on pitcher
irrigation in Iran, and Jose Trueba Davalos,
Guanajuato, GTO, Mexico, for sharing his experience
with pitcher irrigation of corn in Mexico.
Further reading and sources:
Alemi, M.H. 1980. Distribution of water and salt in
soil under trickle and pot irrigation regimes,
Agricultural Water Management, 3:195-203.
Anon. 1978. Clay pot irrigation water conservation in
Iran. J. Aust. Inst. Horticulture. 2(11):15.
Anon. 1976. Try pitcher farming of vegetables.
Intensive Agriculture, 10:19-20.
Anon. 1979. Irrigation with buried clay pots. African
Envir. 3(3/4):378-380.
Balakumaran, K.N., Mathew, J., Pillai, G.R.,
Varghese, K. 1982. Studies on the comparative
effect of pitcher irrigation and pot watering in
cucumber. Agric. Res. J. Kerala. 20(pt2):65-67.
Douglas, J.S. and de J. Hart, R.A. 1984. Forest
farming, ITDG, London, p 154.
Gischler, C. and Fernandez-Jauregui, C. 1984. Low-
cost techniques for water conservation and
management in Latin-America, Nature and
Resources 20(3):11-18.
Gomez-Pompe, A. 1985 Los Recoursos Bioticos de
Mexico, INISRB, Yalapa, Mexico.
Kurian, T., Zodape, S.T., and Rathod, R.D. 1983.
Propagation of Prosopis juliflora by air-layering.
Trans. Indian Soc. of Desert Tech. and Univ.
Centre of Des. Studies. 8(1):104-108.
Mondal, R.C. 1974. Farming with a pitcher. World
Crops, 26:94-97.
Mondal, R.C. 1979 Pitcher farming is economical,
World Crops, 30, 124.
Mondal, R.C. 1983. Salt tolerance of tomato grown
around earthen pitchers. Ind. J. of Agric. Sci.
53(5):380-382.
Mondal, R.C. 1984. Pitcher farming techniques for
use of saline waters. Annual Report, Central Soil
and Salinity Research Institute (CSRRI)1983, 18-
19.
Rai, A.N. 1982. Pitcher farming. ADAB News.
9(3):24-28.
Reddy, S.E. and Rao, S.N. 1980. A comparative study
of pitcher and surface irrigation methods on snake
gourd. Indian J. Hortic. Bangalore 37(1):77-81.
Reddy, S.E. and Rao, S.N. 1980. Response of bitter
gourd (Momordic charantia L.) to pitcher and
basin system of irrigation. South Indian
Horticulture 31(2/3):117-120.
Sahu, R.K. 1984. Pitcher irrigation of watermelon
grown in coastal saline soils. Indian J. Agric.
Sci.54(11):979-983.
Sen, H.S. and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. 1984. Water and
salt movements through soils under different
frequencies of application of water of various
qualities. Annual Report, CSSRI 1983, 159-160.
Sheng Han, Shih 1974. Fan Sheng-chih Shu: An
agriculturist book of China written by Fan Sheng-
chih in the first century BC, Science Books,
Peking. p36-37.
Shiek'h, M.T. and Shah, B.H. 1983. Establishment of
vegetation with pitcher irrigation. Pakistan J. of
Forestry. 33(2):75-81.
Silva, D. A. da, Gheyi, H.R., Silva, A. de. S, and
Magalhaes, A.A. 1981. Irrigacao por capsulas
porosas IV, Effeitos das differentes pressoes
hidrostaticas e populacoes de plantes sobre a
producao do milho, Boletin de pesquisa (Centro
de pesquisa agropecuaria do tropico semi-arido).
Brazil 3, 43-59.
2