Mutual Assured Destruction Essay

Mutual Assured Destruction Essay
The theory of Mutual Assured Destruction describes the idea that neither country would use nuclear weapons as long as they knew that the other
country could retaliate. The theory ultimately lead to the arms race, and was able to continue as the number of nuclear weapons continued to build up.
The theory, which was later deemed MAD, had effects on both the arms race, and way people reacted to the Cold War. The presence of atomic weapons
for both the U.S. and the Soviet Union resulted in the theory of mutual assured destruction, which effectively kept the two nations from entering into
war.
The term "Mutual Assured Destruction" was created when the Soviet Union began to become equal with the United States in terms of nuclear
weapons. The theory ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In particular, in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty of 1968, each side agreed that they would not share nuclear weapon technology with countries that
did not have any (Mutual Assured Destruction). It separated the world into two sides: nations who has nuclear bombs, and ones who do not. The
countries without nuclear bombs who signed the treaty could not develop them and it stopped the growth of nuclear weapons in those countries. Later
in May of 1972 the two nations agreed by treaty to a five year agreement to stop the production of nuclear weapons. With the reduction of nuclear
weapons, the arms race eventually came to an end, making the theory of Mutual Assured Destruction irrelevant
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Mad Max Fury Road : Film Directed By George Miller And...
The world is now barren and dead. Insane cults control the world and one must fight to survive. This is the world of Mad Max Fury Road; a film
directed by George Miller and stars Tom Hardy as the titular Max and Charlize Theron as the imposing Furiosa. The film was released on May 15th
2015 and opened to rave reviews from various sources (Rotten Tomatoes). Brian Tallerico of RogerEbert.com states that, "[the movie] vibrates with the
energy of a veteran filmmaker working at the top of his game (RogerEbert.com)". Of all the elements, the setting elevates the movie to a greater level.
Not only does Miller utilize this setting to highlight the various themes of the film, but he also uses this setting to drive the tension of the film. Though
never explicitly stated, the post–apocalyptic nature of the world had developed due to the exhaustion of natural resources that may have led to a
large scale nuclear war. This is highlighted by the value the characters had played for water, the dusty environment of the film, and the psychological
trauma exhibited by various characters. The paper aims to evaluate the various factors that contributed towards the dilapidated setting of Mad Max:
Fury Road. The first factor that showcases the cause for the apocalyptic nature of the film is the exhaustion of water in the Mad Max universe. This is
illustrated by the obsession the populace has for water. This is obsession is displayed by the main antagonist: Immortan Joe, who successfully controls a

Atomic And Nuclear Bomb : Atomic Bomb
Atomic/Nuclear bomb The atomic bomb ended WWII when the United States dropped Fat Man and Little Boy on the japanese cities of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. This is what started the arms race known as the Cold War between the United States and Russia, the two major world superpowers left
after WWII. The effects of the massive arms race between the two countries still to this day affect every citizen in the world due to the fact so many
weapons of mass destruction were made some were even lost. Along with this, come many groups such as ISIS and Al–Qaeda and even the country of
North Korea that seek to possess these bombs and or make their own to use for their own evil intentions against the free world.The world has rested
on the policy of M.A.D (mutual assured destruction) for too long but with threat of suicidal extremists, this policy won't work any longer so we must
discard of our Metal Horsemen of the apocalypse and use nuclear energy for life instead of death. In the twenty–first century the threat of nuclear war
is still prominent but instead of the U.S.S.R the threat is now centralized in the Middle East and North Korea. So instead of building more bombs, as
we did in the age of the red scare, we are now disarming them according to Sharon Squassoni the Director and Senior Fellow of the Proliferation
Prevention Program . But problems in the middle east and with North Korea have caused us to keep a larger quantity on stand by. The United States is
taking preventative

The Pros And Cons Of Mutual Assured Destruction
Both, the United States and the Soviet Union, developed a capability to launch a devastating attacks through submarines even after sustaining a full
attack from their opponents. This policy became known as Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) both the United States and the Soviet Union knew that
an attack upon the other would be catastrophic to themselves in theory restraining themselves from attacking the other. The risks brought by the use
of these weapons was so horrible that they refrained from using their nuclear weapons. Both sides did not know capacity of the enemy's arsenal being
an arms race in wish the country with the biggest gun or largest arsenal is the victor not knowing the exact capabilities of your adversary led to a
massive production... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Navigation, for example submarines used the satellites to improve the targeting accuracy of their warheads. So what happened during the end of the
Cold War? Does the arms race end? During the mid–1980s, the United States and the Soviet Union's relations improved, Mikhail Gorbachev assumed
power of the Soviet Union and announced a new era of restructuring and openness. Gorbachev proposed a ВЅ reduction of nuclear weapons for both
the United States and Soviet Union. However, the proposal was refused. But the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty signed in Washington on
December 8, 1987 eliminated an entire class of nuclear weapons Due to the economic and social changes occurring in the Soviet Union many of its
republics began to declare their independence. Because of this the Soviet Union was unable to impose its will on its satellite states and so its
influence slowly diminished. In December of 1991, all of the Soviet Union's republics had declared independence. By December 25 the Soviet Union
was declared non–existent thus ending the arms race of the cold war. But of course history has a tendency to repeat its self and new tensions with
Russia and the United States continue to immerge an yet again both countries have begun their demonstration of power though combined military
exercises and provocations both military's are constantly looking to improve their military technology's and

Mutually Assured Destruction: in Theory and Practice
By definition Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy in which full–scale use of nuclear weapons by both sides would
effectively result in the destruction of both side. It is not a complicated concept. An elementary school child could understand that the two biggest kids
in the class don't openly brawl because both would suffer unacceptable damage as well as put third parties in the danger of the crossfire. The concept
of MAD is not the complicated part; it is everything else that pertains to it that has baffled policy makers and theorists for generations. Mutually
Assured Destruction is a complex but precarious balance that dominated the Cold War Era. The stability can easily be disrupted by actions taken by ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Credited with first use of the phrase "assured destruction", McNamara did much to outline the dilemma that both the United States and the United
Soviet Socialist Republic faced. Secretary McNamara proved to be highly influential on the Cold War, such as the Kennedy Administration actions on
the Bay of Pigs Operation, (although it ended up backfired on the Administration). He was also a member of the Executive Committee of the National
Security Counsel that advised President Kennedy on the Cuban Missile Crisis. He is famous for his Athens and Ann Arbor speeches in Greece and
Michigan respectfully, which suggested picking military targets rather than cities, as well as "indivisibility of control" which stressed a united nuclear
deterrent against the communist forces. The idea of a change in targets was however dropped when it was realized how difficult it would be to make it
an effective strategy. 9
Central to the employment of mutually assured destruction as a military doctrine is a belief that neither side would attack for it would ensure its own
death. This delicate balance exists only while conditions remain stable. Different actions each side takes in the conflict effect the stability in different
and often unexpected ways. How it effects the stability depends on the perception each country takes. One action intended by one country to help

Essay on DBQ: Cold War
A war does not necessarily require a physical weapon to fight. From 1947 to 1991, military tension and ideological conflicts held place. Cold War is
defined as a state of political hostility existing between countries, characterized by threats, violent propaganda, subversive activities, and other
measures short of open warfare, in particular. The causes of the cold war between United States and the Soviet Union were the mutual distrust that
had taken place in World War II, intense rivalry between the two super powers, and conflicting ideologies. The two superpowers differed in views of
political and economic principles and were eager to spread their ideologies to many countries. United States were in favor of democracy and capitalism
while... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is a part in the excerpt from a speech by Nikita Khrushchev that informs about the actions of U.S. developing an "anti–communism" slogan
(Document 6). The two superpowers were definitely afraid of the other nation increasing in power and influence. They were both eager to spread and
emphasize their own ideology and boost their national self–esteem, but also were desperate to denounce the opposing ideology and seek for
opportunities to restrain the other power's influence. Such slogans in U.S. were created for the sake of containment. Containment is defined as the
action or policy of preventing the expansion of a hostile country or influence which was the USSR in Cold War seen from the perspective of U.S.
Economic aid for nations, especially Europe, was another weapon used to fight the war. After World War II, most of European countries were in a
desperate situation. They suffered in poverty, hunger, and disease. Improved technology and the development of explosives with massive powers led to
the devastation of Europe. Approximately 36 million European men have died in World War II. Not only did the population decrease, infrastructure had
to be reconstructed and it required tremendous amount of reparation. As the European countries were weakened economically and militarily, they were
desperate and more likely to rather fall into and be attracted to the Soviet Union's communism than United States' democracy. United

This Historical Study Will Define The Dual Hostility Of
This historical study will define the dual hostility of the Soviet Union and the United States in the instigation and resolution of the Cuban Missile
Crisis of 1962. The nuclear arms race of the early 1960s defined a period of history in which a stalemate occurred between superpowers. The United
States and the Soviet Union were continually seeking to build larger nuclear arsenals and to also expand their territorial influence over lesser nations.
The Cuban Missile Crisis defines also defines the minor role of Cuba that served to facilitate the expansion of communist influence on the eastern
seaboard to the United States. In this manner, Cuba could not be blamed for being a pawn in the Soviet plan to move missiles 90 miles off the coast of...
It assumed the use of multiple and powerful nuclear weapons by both sides in the Cold War, resulting in reciprocal total annihilation.
This strategic perspective defined the logical outcome of a nuclear war between two major powers, which would result in the destruction of both
sides of the conflict. Therefore, the U.S. and the Soviets would lose in the case of a nuclear war, which laid the foundation for the Cold War and the
political conflicts that followed. This aspect of a "cold war" defines the ideological expansion of communism and capitalist ideology, which would
now compete for world domination. By not being able to actually initiate a "hot war" between the two superpowers, it became apparent that clandestine
spy networks and the movement of nuclear arsenals would set the stage for the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.
The Soviet Union played an important role in bringing nuclear missiles to Castro's Cuba in 1962, but it should also be mentioned in the context of
the overreaching Cold War with the United States. In a broader context of the Cold War, the United States has presaged the Cuban Missile Crisis by
President Kennedy's placement of nuclear missiles on the border of Turkey and Italy, which was perceived as a threat by Soviet leader, Nikita
Khrushchev,. These events took place in 1961, which could be perceived as a cause for the movement of nuclear missiles by the Soviets to Cuba in
1962. Overall, it was also evident that the Soviets and the U.S.

Use Of Satire In Dr Strangelove
The Stanley Kubrick film, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, uses the rhetorical device of satire to raise the
issue of the Soviet–American arms race throughout the film. A satire uses humor, irony, and sarcasm to "expose and discredit vice or folly"
(Merriam–Webster, 2018). Mutually assured destruction was believed to be the end result of a nuclear war between the two world powers and
Kubrick's film pokes fun at this absurd conclusion. The Soviet–American arms race was an intense time period in history that caused American citizens
to fear for their lives, but the film decides to satirize the issue to show audiences that it is absurd to believe that it would ever come to down to
complete annihilation of the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove, an ex–Nazi scientist counseling the President and the generals in the war room, having a mechanical arm "with a mind of its own"
(Manos, 1). The arm abruptly snapped into a Nazi salute and Dr. Strangelove seemed to fight against his own arm that began to strangle him. The
madness of the nuclear arms race and the real danger of starting a world war is intensely ridiculed with such foolishness.
In another scene of the film, the President of the United States made a phone call to the Russian Premier to warn him about the nuclear bombers that
cannot be recalled. During this phone call, the two men quarreled over who was sorrier to the other about the pressing matter. As long as the two men
both know that they are both very sorry and it is nothing personal, everything is just fine–even though millions of lives are about to be taken. This is a
prime example of the dark humor utilized throughout the movie.
The issue of the nuclear arms race between the Soviets and the Americans proved to be a dangerous time for the people of that era. Americans feared
for their lives because the thought of human extinction seemed possible with the threat of a nuclear war. Dr. Strangelove mocks the people's fears by
using dark humor throughout the film. The movie depicts impending doom as a result of the Cold War but because it is a satire, it makes the audience
want to laugh at the

John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Speech After World War II
The inaugural speech of the newly elected American President John F. Kennedy address to the newly independent countries from all over the world.
Bu most importantly President Kennedy addresses to the Soviet Union leaders, since the world was divided into blocks facing each other. The Cold
War shaped the world after the WWII, so as a logical first speech of the new President of one the most powerful nations on earth is to try to show his
vision of the world.
The reason of President Kennedy's speech is related to the start of WWII which aim at worldwide domination. Nazi Germany wanting to restore its
place among the great nations of Europe and the world became more demanding. The other European countries not willing to share the territory that
they acquired in Africa, South America, and Asia gave the Nazis an excuse to declare war to every nations that will oppose them in their conquest of
the world. Germany invaded and occupied most Europe; however, when the US entered the war brought, it brought hope to the last Western European
country resisting the Nazis. On the other hand, the Soviet Union was resisting the invasion of the Nazis on East Europe. Briefly, The Nazis lost the
war and Europe was divided between the US and its allies and Soviet Union and its satellites countries. President Kennedy addresses three different
audiences. The first audience is the american people. He reminds them of the values that makes America and why they ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Kennedy, i understood why he was one the popular president his time. Hi view of the world was a breath of hope. He was the right man for those
critical times, a man that was seeking dialogue between two superpowers. His stance to promote dialogue and peace for the world have probably cost
him his life. In conclusion, this speech has made understand better the approach of President Kennedy of an imminent threat that the US has faced in
all its

How Is Technology Used In Miller's War?
Science and technology has often created undesirable situations, which would have escalated the modern–day crisis that mirrors of those described by
Miller. Furthermore the idea Miller presented in his novel, showed that his ideas were stemmed from the Romanticism Period; as his idea for the
growth of civilization due technoscience is not possible . He effectively portrayed his idea in the novel, as society advanced in technology it led to end
of the societies, in two eras of modernization. During World War II, the U.S created the first nuclear weapons and was utilized in the war, as two
atomic bombs were dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This event provided a glimpse on how Miller's global crisis would look like as portrayed in
the novel, "There was great deserts where once life was, and in those places of the Earth where men still lived, all were sickened by the poisoned air..." .
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This event would parallel the "Flame Deluge or Nuclear Holocaust" in the Miller's novel. However, through mutual cooperation of both nations, this
catastrophic event was evaded and better measures for nuclear weapons was taken in account. It demonstrates technological advancement can be
utilized for warfare purposes. The piece history confirmed the ideas presented by Langdon Winner, "...technologies can be used in ways that enhance
the power, authority, and privilege of some over other..." Winner emphasizes the notion of power is closely linked to the idea of science and
technology within society. Personally, if a nuclear crisis occurs in the near–future, it would be contributed to nation's struggle for power and superiority
over the entire globe. Even though the facts present demonstrates how society can eventual lead to its own destruction that parallels in Miller's novel,
science and technology have left far–reaching effects on other current contemporary global

Dr Strangelove Cold War
Dr. Strangelove is a comedy about the Cold War intended for a young adult or adult audience due to the topic of the Cold War not being understood
easily by children. The reason for creating this film is for the comedic spin on a very serious historical event, making it truly a one of a kind movie.
The point that this director was trying to make was that anything could be seen as funny with the right wording. This could be seen as controversial
because war is not something that should be taken lightly, but the way this movie was written was only exaggerating the Cold War and tweaking the
ending where everyone was doomed. This was a good strategy in making a movie in this style as opposed to seemingly making fun of the Cold War
and those involved. As I have stated before, the main subject of this movie is the Cold War. I did have previous knowledge of this subject such as it...
Strangelove is a fantastic, must–see movie. The whole script is witty and well–written with lines such as "Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is
the War Room!" and "Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones."
Not only is the script amazing, but Peter Sellers acting is fantastic! He plays Mandrake, President Muffley, and Dr. Strangelove, yet differentiates each
character perfectly as to create the illusion of three entirely different people. Every actor plays their part almost perfectly. The only drawback of the
entire movie would be when the ambassador of the Soviet Union started taking pictures, there was an opportunity for more conflict, but that never went
anywhere. It seemed almost as if that scene wasn't supposed to make the final cut, seeing as it went nowhere. Besides that only fatal flaw, Dr.
Strangelove is incredible. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who wants a fun comedy to watch. Its witty script and impeccable actors
makes Dr. Strangelove a must–see

Dr Strangelove And The Cold War
The movies WarGames and Dr. Strangelove (or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb) provide incredibly interesting narratives that
provide two different narratives regarding public perception of the cold war and nuclear weapons. WarGames made the statement that tensions during
the Cold War were so high that a teenager playing a videogame could set off a nuclear war, while Dr. Strangelove simply ridiculed the attitudes of
those involved in the Cold War and mocked those who took it seriously, under the pretense that mutually assured destruction would prevent any real
war from breaking out (and as a plot device to depict irony). In reality, the American public was in constant fear of the outbreak of war during the
period of time in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove are anti–war movies, although they portray it in very different ways. WarGames depicts this by showing the consequences of the war via
simulation, while Dr. Strangelove showed the consequences of the war simply through discussion, and implied that those repercussions actually
occurred after a bomb was dropped at the end of the movie. In WarGames, the famous line "the only way to win is not to play" was first uttered, which
completely captures the spirit of the Cold War– any move by any party would have caused the extinction of the human race. Kubrick embodied this in
Dr. Strangelove with the plot point of the doomsday device, showing that if the United States engaged the Soviet Union at all that it would assure their
own destruction. Overall, while WarGames made the statement that tensions during the Cold War were so high that a teenager playing a videogame
could set off a nuclear war, Dr. Strangelove simply ridiculed the attitudes of those involved in the Cold War and mocked those who took it seriously,
under the pretense that mutually assured destruction would prevent any real war from breaking out. It's clear that WarGames was written to show that
a worst–case scenario, which we consider today to be highly unlikely, was actually quite the possibility during the peak of the Cold War. In Dr.
Strangelove, the director Stanley Kubrick showed that no sane person could possibly believe that the Cold War could have come to fruition in a way

Paradoxically Life Saving
On the morning of August 6th, 1945, 1900 feet above Hiroshima, Japan, one hundred forty pounds of highly enriched uranium–235 collided with itself,
triggering the first manmade nuclear explosion ever detonated over a populated city ("Little Boy" 1). Seconds later, the lives of 70,000 men, women
and children were extinguished ("The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima" 6). Over the course of the next several years the effects of radiation poisoning
would kill an additional one hundred thirty thousand people, making the first atomic bomb, nicknamed "little boy", the most devastating weapon ever
used by mankind – for an astonishingly short four days ("The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima" 6). On the morning of August 9th, 1945, another atomic
bomb, more... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In comparison with the 14 million lives that could have been lost in a direct land invasion of Japan, the two cities and several hundred thousand lives
obliterated by the atomic bombs seem insignificant. Some objections to the use of these weapons include unfounded claims that President Truman, the
President of the United States who assumed control after President Roosevelt died in 1945, wanted to use the bombs only to satisfy his own
bloodlust, and the bloodlust of American citizens. But the clear presentation of the facts involved with Operation Downfall, which President Truman
did have available to him at the time, should be enough to convince anyone of the almost paradoxical life saving power of the atomic bombs. Among
the many objections raised by opponents of the use of the atomic bombs, one of the most difficult ones to substantiate is the claim that Japan may
have been coerced to surrender in other ways. Evidence for this claim includes the Russian declaration of war against Japan on August 8th, 1945, the
day before the use of the second bomb on Nagasaki, and Japan's possible willingness to accept a conditional surrender (Gordin 5). Seeking not only the
surrender of Japan, but an expansion of their own territory, the Russians decided to commit forces to an Eastern front. On August 8th Russian troops
invaded Japanese occupied Manchuria, which the Japanese had

Comparison of the 1938 Munich Crisis and 1962 Cuban...
Comparison of the 1938 Munich Crisis and 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and the Role of Nuclear Arms
Introduction
In annals of the 20th century, the Munich crisis of 1938 and the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 are two of the more riveting examples of crisis
diplomacy (Richardson 1994). Comparisons of the two cases yield a robust discourse on their similarities and differences. The two cases illustrate the
complexity of international leadership through 'summit diplomacy' (Dobbs 2008; Faber 2008; Reynolds 2008).
The outcomes of the two historic events are vastly different. For instance, the Munich crisis eventually became a prelude to World War II that dragged
Great Britain to war with Germany. The Cuban Missile Crisis turned out to be... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1939, Hitler annexed the rest of Czechoslovakia in violation of the agreement. Germany also invaded Poland and Hungary dragging Britain and
France to World War II against it. Likewise, the USSR discarded its pro
–western policy and signed a Nazi–Soviet Pact.
Chamberlain's appeasement policy was derided by British as a failure (Reynolds, 37). Considering that Hitler was deceptive, appeasement will never
work. It may have been more strategic if the purpose was to buy time while Britain was preparing for war. On hindsight, the one–year interim period
between the Munich agreement in 1938 to Britain's war in 1939 provided the opportunity for Britain to boost its artillery before going to a crucial war
in 1940 (Reynolds, 93).
1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
The thirteen days of October 1962 is considered to have no parallel in the history of mankind. It is regarded as the moment when the world came too
close to the fringes of nuclear Armageddon (Allison and Zelikow, 1). The Cuban Missile Crisis was a confrontation involving the two
ideologically–opposed nuclear superpowers – the United States and the Soviet Union– over Cuba set in the Cold War era. The crisis escalated when the
US took photographs of Soviet missile bases secretly being built in Cuba. These bases stock piled a number of medium–and–intermediate–range
ballistic nuclear missiles pointed to the US.
The US favored militarily 'quarantine' by blocking Soviet

David and Goliath Analysis Essay
"David and Goliath Analysis" In the story David and Goliath there is a great lesson to be learned. The story shows that you should never
underestimate your opponent and be prepared for anything. David's own intellect and knowledge of his own abilities enabled him to become the
smaller, but stronger opponent. It all comes down to who is the better leader. David was a young shepherd boy who watched over the sheep while
feeding and keeping them safe from the lions and bears. While watching the sheep David would spend many moments speaking to God and playing
a harp. David's brothers were at the battlefield and one day he was "sent to the battle lines by his father to bring back news of his brothers." (Fairchild,
2012) David was not afraid... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Goliath laughs at the size of David while David is confident with God by his side. David then uses his sling–shot to launch a stone at Goliath's head
which knocks him down on his face. The giant fell allowing David to take his sword and behead Goliath with it. David took advantage of Goliaths
mistakes. He underestimated David's ability and failed to move out of the way of the rock. If you are prepared for all obstacles and keep an open
mind you are more likely to come out victorious. David's own intellect and knowledge of his own abilities made Goliath the smaller, but stronger
opponent. This story can be related to the difference between WW1 and WW2. During WW1 trench warfare was used. Trench warfare is a ditch dug
out of the ground to give troops protection from the enemies. The soldiers used machine guns, mustard and chlorine gases and smokeless gunpowder
to ward off the enemy. Machine guns were the main weapons used by soldiers. However "they needed 4–6 men to man them" (Tasker, 2012) and had
to be positioned on a flat surfaces. When the mustard and chlorine gases were released the soldiers had to take great precaution to not breathe it in
because the result is immediate death. These trenches also carried many diseases and rats making it a harsh condition for soldiers. By the time of
WW2 also known as the "Cold War" the atomic bomb was invented. The atomic bomb has the ability to take out an entire city. Russia and the U.S.
achieve nuclear equality

Stanley KubrickвЂ™s Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to...
Stanley Kubrick's 1964 film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb presents a satire of the Cold War and nuclear
warfare. The film stars comedian Peter Sellers in three different roles, including the president, a Royal Air Force officer, and the title character of Dr.
Strangelove–a character who does not play a major role in the action until the final scene of the film. The film itself was adapted by Stanley Kubrick,
Peter George, and Terry Southern from George's thriller novel Red Alert and was originally intended to be a drama, but was made into a satirical
black comedy in the writing process (Webster 33). In the final scene, the leaders of the American government are gathered in the War Room awaiting
...
Additionally, he combines pathos and logos in addressing the president's fear of deciding who would be taken into the mine shafts by saying that a
computer would be necessary to make this decision. Despite all the scientific reasoning in his argument, what seems to be very effective in the
argument is the strong appeal of the sex ratio of ten women–who have been chosen for their "highly stimulating sexual appeal"–to every one man. He
presents this argument in a very logical and unassuming sense, saying that it will be a "sacrifice" and referring to the sexual acts as a form of
"service". This pathos–based argument of sexual interest is what causes General Turgidson to start arguing for the use of these mine shafts.
General Turgidson's argument relies far more on strategic thinking from the "military point of view" that emotionally appeals with pathos to the
president using Cold War tensions and this new "mine shaft race". He begins his argument in a lower register talking directly talking to the president,
appealing to his fear of further Soviet–United States clashes that could spring up after they emerge from the mine shafts, which was brought to his
attention after the Soviet ambassador compliments Dr. Strangelove on his idea for human survival. His use of slang with the word "Ruskies" ties
directly into the fear of Soviet dominance over America. This also points to General Turgidson's strong

Persuasive Essay On Aliens
The Alien in our thoughts
If aliens came to take over the earth and threaten humanity, country leaders from across the globe would come together and not fight from a
perspective of saving their own people; but all people; otherwise, homo–sapiens would seize to exist. Money and resources would no longer be tied to
nationalistic interests; but to the interest of furthering humanity. Unfortunately, there are aliens threatening humanity, but the aliens endangering the
world and its peoples aren't a foreign species from outer space; the alien is configured in the global means of thinking and acting regarding foreign
policy.
Differences in prosperity across the globe are stunning. To elaborate, the GDP per capita in Somalia is 434.21 USD, while theUnited States' GPD is
57,466.79 USD (World Bank). In October 1970, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution including the goal that: "Each economically advanced
country will progressively increase its official development assistance [...] and will exert its best efforts to reach a minimum net amount of 0.7% of its
gross national product [...] by the middle of the decade." Most countries have been unwilling, to reach this goal. The United States is at the bottom of
the list, giving an insignificant 0.17%. Insignificant; not only because of the minuscule amount that it allocated for foreign aid, but the tactless reality
that the U.S, is more likely to bomb other countries than assist in building them. Furthermore, in 2016, the United

Dr. Strangelove 's Argument For The 1964 Film Essay
Charles Maland's argument for the 1964 film Dr. Strangelove is that it was one of the most "fascinating and important American films of the 1960s."
He backs up his argument with evidence of the films rejection of the Ideology of Liberal Consensus, its attack on "crackpot realism" and critique of
life in the 1960s Cold War era, and finally its paradoxical revolution that sets an example for other films to come after. The Ideology of Liberal
Consensus according to Maland was explained as the United States' structure of society as being basically sound. This would stand for a capitalistic
and democratic society as opposed to the Soviet Union's communist or state–capitalist economy and governmental structure. The second point of the
Ideology of Liberal Consensus was that communism was a clear danger to the survival of the United States and its allies. It's clear that neither of the
two world powers were eager to adopt one another's economic or governmental structure, however, both sides were eager to stretch their sphere of
influence to other regions of the world after World War Two. Maland proclaims that the American people had felt threatened by foreign totalitarian
regimes, such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This fear of totalitarianism was solidified by the U.S.' involvement in World War Two with
their goals to destroy fascist regimes. While the film Dr. Strangelove was being developed by Stanley Kubrick, the American public was in a
transitional period away from

Good Versus Evil, The Allies Versus The Axis, World War II
Good versus evil, the allies versus the axis, world war II was raging throughout Europe, Africa, and Asia. Neither winning nor losing was
guaranteed to either side, so each wanted an ace up their sleeve. In fear of Germany acquiring a nuclear bomb, the United States set up their own
program, the Manhattan project, in order to make one before the Nazis could. With the help of British and refugee scientists, and a blank check of
two billion dollars, now $32.5 billion, the Manhattan project was born in 1942, and only three years later in 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested
in New Mexico. Ironically, by this time Germany had stopped trying to make a nuclear bomb. Although the war was reaching its final hour, Japan
showed no intention to surrender, so in order to avoid a costly invasion, the United States pulled out its ace and dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima and
3 days later, Fat Man on Nagasaki . With the war having ended and the world having seen the grand awe of anuclear weapon, the enemy of my enemy
is my friend mentality of the United States' and Soviet Union's alliance was no more, and the two superpowers were thrust into the Cold War. Although
the cold war caused death and despair, the arms race between the United States and Soviet union had positive effects, therefore the cold war had a
positive effect on the world.
Despite the Cold War having no direct fighting between the U.S and the soviets, there were still multiple costly indirect conflicts between the two

Nuclear Weapons As a Defense Mechanism
Nuclear weapons are the safest defense mechanism in the world. Although nuclear weapons can lead to mass destruction and the loss of thousands of
lives when detonated, they are the optimal solution to the conflicts between countries in the future. The actual use of the nuclear weapon is not the
deterrent, but rather just the mere fact that a country could use it against another country which avoids the large scale conflict. Thus, nuclear deterrence
presents itself as a preferred security option. Firstly, based on deterrence theory, nuclear weapons will lead toMutual Assured Destruction (MAD). This
means that if nuclear weapons are used in warfare, either side will not be able to succeed in winning, as the destruction caused by the weapons ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thus, it is clear that fear is the primary driving force behind nuclear deterrence. The Oxford dictionary defines fear as an unpleasant emotion caused by
the threat of danger, pain or harm; this "unpleasant emotion is the only thing which stands between total destruction and peace. When conflicts occur
between countries, nuclear deterrence is the ultimate resolution. The country with fewer nuclear weapons will have to end their efforts in sustaining
the conflict, resolving the issue. No matter how many nuclear weapons are created, based on deterrence theory, they will never be used due to the fear
of mutually assured destruction. Therefore, the advantage of nuclear deterrence is that it is expected to result in a tense but stable global peace (Mutual
assured destruction, 2014).
The only use of nuclear weapons in warfare was during World War II. At the end of World War II, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on
Japan, one in Hiroshima and the other in Nagasaki. The devastation from these bombs was immense. There were an estimated 225,000 casualties as a
result of the atomic bombs (Yamazaki, n.d.). An astounding number of people were crushed in their homes and in the buildings in which they were
working (Yamazaki, n.d.). "Their skeletons could be seen in the debris and ashes for almost 1,500 meters from the center of the blast, particularly in the
downwind directions" (Yamazaki, n.d.).

1980s Political Culture: The Cold War and Mutual Assured...
1980s Political Culture: The Cold War and Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) 1980s Political Culture Figure 1. Nena, "99 Luftballons" (1983) / "99
Red Balloons" (1984) A dance–rock protest song from West Germany, during the Cold War partition of Germany. The song describes a nuclear war
starting because of misinterpreted signals from a bunch of balloons. Audio available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEWHItzvQHk Lyrics:
You and I in a little toy shop Buy a bag of balloons with the money we've got. Set them free at the break of dawn 'Til one by one, they were gone.
Back at base, bugs in the software Flash the message, Something's out there. Floating in the summer sky. 99 red balloons go by. 99 red balloons.
floating in the summer sky. Panic bells, it's red alert. There's something here from somewhere else. The war machine springs to life. Opens up one
eager eye. Focusing it on the sky. Where 99 red balloons go by. 99 Decision Street. 99 ministers meet. To worry, worry, super
–scurry. Call the troops
out in a hurry. This is what we've waited for. This is it boys, this is war. The president is on the line As 99 red balloons go by. 99 Knights of the air
Ride super–high–tech jet fighters Everyone's a superhero. Everyone's a Captain Kirk. With orders to identify. To clarify and classify. Scramble in the
summer sky. As 99 red balloons go by. 99 dreams I have had. In every one a red balloon. It's all

A Poor Allocation Of Our Nation 's Time And Resources
23.7%. That is how many of 600 randomly surveyed students and staff in an independent study at PNHS said they "Strongly Agree" that their
household is generally prepared for disasters (Witek, Figure 1). In the modern world, everyday citizens live under constant, and generally ignored,
threats like those of nuclear warfare, international terrorism, cyber attacks, natural disasters, and other large–scale crises. While we go about our daily
lives, these potential events linger and yet the average US citizen stands under–prepared or entirely unprepared for these harsh realities. Despite this
shocking fact, the US Government continues to focus on defending the country rather than preparing its population. This document will argue as to
why this is a poor allocation of our nation's time and resources and why programs like Civil Defense, popular and commonplace during the Cold War,
should be brought back into the picture for the preservation of the nation and its people. Our nation and its population should be educated, prepared
and exercised for the harsh realities of the modern world. Along the lines of large–scale disasters, there are nearly infinite scenarios where things can
go horribly wrong in a matter of minutes and hours, as opposed to months and years. Nuclear war lingers between the US and North Korea (McConnell
/Todd), the tension between Russia and the US remains higher than ever (Khanal), and revived disputes between India and Pakistan threaten to ignite
warfare

Dr. Strangelove: Movie Analysis
Dr. Strangelove is one of the many masterpieces made by the great Stanley Kubrick. The movie was made in 1964 at the Shepperton Studios in
London, UK. The time the movie was made is of great importance, in fact, it was made only two years after the Cuban Missile Crisis. Kubrick
pictures, in an extremely comical yet somewhat serious way, what the world would look like after one of the two forces (U.S vs. USSR) was triggered
in initializing nuclear warfare.
General Jack Ripper is an obsessively paranoid, crazy, right–wing commander that deeply believes in the idea that the Russians have been fluoridating
the water Americans have been consuming in order to affect their "preciously body fluids". For this reason, he deems necessary to intervene and stop
such action. This is achieved by sending a nuclear attack on Russia, Ripper uses his position of Air Force General to create such an attack that cannot
be reversed by the politicians in D.C., leaving them only the choice of either fully committing to the attack or trying to resist to Russia's retaliation.
Ripper closes off any contact with the base and orders the soldiers at the base to fire at anybody who tries to get into the base. In the meantime, word
gets to Washington and the main figures of the country, including the President, meet in the War... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove is black comedy in its purest form and the director achieves this by following a very unique yet effective style, in this style, we can find
plenty of components that make this movie of the greatest Hollywood movies ever made.
First, the mise–en–scГЁne is fundamental. This can be noted when we look at the first shots of the Air Force base from where General Ripper will
send his attack, everything is there for a reason. The billboard saying "Peace is Our Profession" is a clear joke given the actions of the General. The
mise–en–scene is a tool given to the audience to help them understand the perspective of the movie from Kubrick's very point of

Mutually Assured Destruction Concept
Analyzing the concept of M.A.D.
In a world that is capable to destroy itself, thinking about a nuclear war is probably one of the most disheartening feelings a person can feel and
this is due to the fact that it is a reality, meaning nuclear war can happen at any time. The world today has progressed so far in technology that now,
nuclear devices are far more powerful than the two atomic bombs dropped on the two Japanese cities in 1945, which caused mass destruction. That
being said, it is extremely important for the world to keep nuclear stability, merely to avoid an event similar to Japans in 1945. This is where the
M.A.D. doctrine comes in place, the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine is where two countries are employed in nuclear scaled ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although the doctrine did provide somewhat of a nuclear balance, it initially lead to the arms race between the Soviets and he Americans. M.A.D.
came into place a little while after the U.S. was no longer the nuclear superpower in 1949. Due to the Soviets also becoming a nuclear superpower, the
new Cold War was seen as a scary time. Although American and Russia still have the biggest stockpile today, more countries have felt the need to
also acquire a nuclear deterrence for security purposes. They may not have the capability to completely destroy another country, but definitely have
the capability of assuring mutual mass destruction regardless to who shoots first. With the U.S. being the first to create the bomb as well as being the
only country to have used it, I feel as part of a global community the U.S. is more obligated than other countries to work on undoing this doctrine and
by that I mean the complete disbarment of nuclear weapons. As individuals, if we can all come together to just support the disbarment of nuclear
weapons, it could possibly put the world as we know it on that path. Individuals coming together could possibly influence this creating a better, safer

Causes of the Cuban Missile Crisis
The Cuban Missile Crisis was one of the most pressured filled moments in the history of the United States. Furthermore, the actins that took place that
day would have not have just effected the United States and the Soviet Union but the entire war. The U.S. and Soviet Union the resident two
superpowers of the time were on the verge of all out nuclear war. That potential war would have murdered tens of thousands of people within the first
couple days. Furthermore, the nuclear fallout from a war of that magnitude would hurt many generations to come. The fallout from the war would have
major lasting effects for years to come. Thankfully, the actions taken that day by both theUnited States and Soviet Union were not disastrous. The
actions taken that day resulted in a peaceful resolution that saw both countries; lessen their threat towards each other. The Cuban Missile Crisis was a
moment of great pressures but the question is why did it ever come to that. The crisis did not just occur there were reasons for why that event took
place. Ultimately the Cuban Missile Crisis occurred because of the Manhattan Engineering Department (MED), Mutual Assured Deterrence (MAD),
Missile Gap, Strategic Air Command (SAC), and the Bay of Pigs. These five entities were necessary for the Cuban Missile Crisis to be necessary.
The Manhattan Engineering Department (MED) also known as the Manhattan Project has had a huge impact on why the Missile Crisis occurred. MED
was commissioned to see if the

The Cold War During World War II Essay
The Cold War was one of the most fear–inducing situations in American history. Post World War II, the superpowers of the world, namely the United
States and the U.S.S.R, struggled to settle issues that arose from initiatives and responses after the war. These created the climate of tension and distrust
between the two nations (Sibley 1). The United States held tightly to its liberal–capitalist beliefs while the Soviets "...professed fervent belief," in their
Marxist–Leninist ideology (Sibley 1). Many events led to the tension between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. First, the Soviets grew to distrust the Americans
because, during World War II, the U.S. waited a long time to open a second front and relieve the Russians of the German attack. Then, during the
Yalta Conference of 1945, it was agreed that Poland would be led by both democratic and communist powers until a democratic election could take
place, but Communists took over soon after that and controlled Poland for the next four decades. This left the U.S. State Department feeling betrayed
by the Soviets. The Soviets, in turn, felt betrayed by the United States after they were pushed out of Japan with the dropping of the Atomic Bomb.
After that, a U.S. representative to the UN Atomic Energy Commission proposed that all atomic weapons materials be placed under international
control and to destroy weapons that already existed (Sibley 7). Russia did not like this plan because it allowed the United States to hold onto its
complete

Dr Strangelove Themes
The Cold War was a period from 1947 to 1991 that adhered erratic tension and constant threat of nuclear conflict between the two remaining
superpowers that emerged from WWII, the U.S. and the Soviet Union. The 1964 film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love
the Bomb, directed by Stanley Kubrick, depicts the overlying themes of the Cold War in a comedic fashion. This film's full embodiment of the Cold
War is seen through its representation of the time period, and the sheer competitiveness between the United States and Russia. Additionally, due to
many of Kubrick's movie decisions, the film has helped society acknowledge and understand the pure absurdity that the topic of nuclear destruction
holds. In Dr. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
General alone goes rogue and sends the missiles toward Russia. This puts the U.S. President in an immensely tight scenario.
The film delves into some of the difficult options leaders have to choose from in cases involving nuclear weapons. Nuclear conflicts are
extraordinarily complex, with many potential unpredictable outcomes. After General Ripper directs his plane to bomb the enemy, he describes his
thought process to one of his officers, "...when [the president's advisors] realize there is no possibility in recalling the wing there will be only one
course of action: open, total commitment". Here, a "total commitment" consists of the U.S. supporting General Ripper's plan by utilizing their full
arsenal of nuclear weapons to attack Russia. General "Buck" Turgidson, one of the President's top advisors, echoes this exact idea in the war room
and proposes to the U.S. President a full commitment. This was a possible solution that could have neutralized all of Russia in one wave of nuclear
missiles; however, this strategy is frowned upon and dismissed by the President as it would reflect poorly on the U.S.' diplomatic reputation in the
long–run.
An aspect of the Cold War that Kubrick focuses on is the blatant lack of trust between the conflicting nations. In a scene where a Russian Ambassador is
being brought into the war room by the U.S. President to help determine a mutual solution,

Deterrence During The Cold War
The concepts associated with the classical nuclear strategy during the Cold War was effective in preventing a nuclear exchange between the U.S. and
Soviet Union. Mutual assured destruction provided the incentive for both countries to avoid direct conflict. Classic deterrence strategy is not relevant
against modern non–state threats and cannot successfully deter non–state actors. There is no standard definition of deterrence. Scholars offer differing
meanings and concepts but all agree on the common assumption that "deterrence is successful as long as aggression does not take place." The essence
of deterrence is that the threat of harm prevents an adversary from doing something. It is achieved when an adversary practices restraint... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
These concepts were focused on preventing direct conflict between the established superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union. It was a
well–defined approach used by rational actors that contained critical elements of success. "Credibility is central to any deterrence threat." Effectiveness
depended on the accurate communication of credible threats against each other's national interest. Success depended on the belief that each country
was willing and able to carrying out the stated threat which had to be communicated "early, clearly and publicly." Declarative statements by each nation
established "red lines" and provided a clear understanding of what would provoke a forceful response. Classical deterrence prevented a nuclear
exchange between America and the Soviet Union because both nations had well defined interests, they effectively communicated their intentions and
both were willing and able to use the credible threat of mutual assured destruction. This strategy of "deterrence by punishment" made the cost of using
nuclear weapons excessive in comparison to the benefit. This strategy cannot be applied successfully against today's non–state

Mutually Assured Destruction Of The Cold War
In the mid–1960s, a doctrine was created officially accepting that the Soviet Union and the United States of America could completely destroy each
other by means of nuclear warfare. This doctrine was labeled as Mutually Assured Destruction, or Mutual Assured Destruction, A.K.A MAD. The
meaning of this term defines the fact that any and all parties involved with nuclear war would be utterly obliviated, therefore deterring countries from
partaking in such an event.
As both sides of the Cold War began to fashion intensely dangerous weapons, it was soon realized that if either party launched a first strike, it would be
ensuring the death of their opponent as well as themselves. The Soviet Union's development of their nuclear arsenal forced

Chapter One: 1.4 Arguments and Explanations/ Page 24-26 Essay
Chapter One: 1.4 Arguments and Explanations/ Page 24–26
Exercises 10: This is essentially an argument. The author argues, "Love looks not with eyes but with mind." However, Shakespeare primary
argumentative claim is that true love is able to ignore superficial beauty and appreciate the genuine value of a person. Thus, he believes that Cupid,
being the agent of love, is therefore blind to appearance. Cupid is often portrayed in art as wearing a blindfold, "painted blind". Yet, the following
passage contains some argument and has been interpreted as argument. Therefore, the entire propositions preceding the first judgment and/ or claim of
the passage serve as premises.
Exercises 11: This is an explanation passage; the author explains the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The author explanation is basis in which the conclusion represents an accepted fact and the reason represents a cause of the passage fact. Yet, the
passage purpose is to help us understand how or why that fact occurs. Thus, the author brings strong explanation, in fact, where it got him to the point
when he clarified that "the interesting of life can exist only in three dimensions. Due to all of the interpretations of this proposition that be preceding the
passage serve as a conclusion. Exercises 14: This is an explanation passage: what is being explained is that translator and interpreters that have helped
the troop of USA is diplomats now and want to resettle in the USA. This explanation is composed of two parts; one is the translator and interpreters
want to resttle in the USA and second are the USA does not have an adequate number of interpreters and translator whom want to proficient in universal
languages. By this passage, interpretations proposition that preceding the serve as in a premise.
Exercise 15: This is essentially an explanation passage; the author explains the failure of treasury department that design and issue paper currency that
is with good grace evident to shade and visually damage the human beings of violate. One might interpret the passage as more an argument because he
relies on stronger sources to support his claims in fact when the author mentioned no disabled person is discrimination. Consequently, the entire

The Debate Of Nuclear Weapons
The debate that nuclear weapons kept peace through mutually assured destruction is still quite controversial. Though some historians do not believe
this. Eric Hobsbawm states this, "both sides thus found themselves committed to an insane arms race to mutual destruction." The interpretations A, B,
C, D both agree and disagree with this point and each historian has their on views. Interpretation A and D disagreed with the question however also had
a different view and since it was more revisionist blamed America. On the other hand B and C saw nuclear weapons as a deterrent and agreed with the
question. However B state they knew about mutually assured destruction. Interpretation A is from a historian who considers the reasons for the US
attitude to nuclear weapons. The interpretation by Hobsbawm shows that due to the Americanism ideology, the anti–Red witch hunts and the victory
of the communists in China the USA found its self aggressively dealing with the issue. Therefore both sides were committed to an arms race due to
fear. Therefore Hobsbawm is stating that America was using nuclear weapons not as a nuclear deterrent but as a threat against the USSR, to halt the
spread of communism into the west. The source is correct in bring up certain points that America did threaten other countries with nuclear arms and did
almost use them. An example of this very instance was during the Korean War when General MacArthur went to ask president Truman if he could drop
an A–bomb on

War in the Nuclear Era
Addressing the question of whether war is a rational decision or a mistake is important to understand the causes of war and explain the reduction in the
number of wars fought among countries in today's nuclear era. The argument, under which war is a mistake, is a normative claim about what action
states should have chosen, based on the outcomes that have been produced. That is, for a decision to be good, it needs to have produced the actor's
preferred outcome. However, the mistake perspective is problematic under the uncertainty and competitiveness of the anarchic international political
system.
The rational theory provides a better alternative. In this paper, the rational theory of war will unfold by beginning with an understanding of ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
States pay attention to the long term as well as the immediate consequences of their actions. Therefore, the value of going to war is the outcome for
which a state would settle through bargaining. Thus, for any deal to prevent war, each state must decide that they prefer the deal to fighting a war.
Mistake advocators will be quick to point out that the utility–maximizing perspective might be problematic since the theory does not include
uncertainty in its evaluation of costs and benefits. However, accepting this criticism will not undermine the rational perspective. The
utility–maximizing theory is only the simplified first step in assessing the rationality of a state decision to fight a war.
That being said, this vision of rationality accounts in part for the reduction in the number of wars fought between countries now compared to the past.
Nuclear technology and mutually assured destruction have elevated the cost of war to such an extent that it is now almost impossible for the benefits
to outweigh the costs of nuclear warfare. Thus, the main interest in security has shifted the rational utility–maximizing states' policy from winning to
avoiding wars.
Rationality and relative power: Balance, stability and security
Today's 'balanced multi polarity', stabilized by nuclear technology, makes international relations more secure

The Prisoner 's Dilemma And Game Theory
The first thing that comes to mind at the mention of Nuclear Warfare is the Cold War between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. These two major global
powers fought for dominance on the global stage for what purpose? They fought to ensure that neither side's values and structures could dominate the
world at the cost of the other's destruction. At its peak, in the 1950s and 1960s, the Cold War represented a way of life for many Americans and
Russians. The constant fear and belief that we could be bombed at any second seriously impacted the standards of living in both nations. Comparable
to the fear of terrorism in the in the 21st Century, the Cold War dominates the history books during this period of time. At the same time, during the
50's, in a different field of study, the concept of the prisoner's dilemma and game theory were being developed. That reason, may explain why this
particular dilemma is associated with nuclear decisions.
Upon closer inspection, the nuclear warfare debacle isn't quite a prisoner's dilemma. There are outside factors that influence the decisions made by
heads of state that change the dynamics of the game. A true prisoner's dilemma would assign values to cooperation (not bombing) and defection
(bombing) in such a way that the equilibrium outcome is mutual defection. The outcome that is most likely to occur based on the beneficial choices of
each nation is mutual bombing of the other nation. Is it the best outcome? No. Is it the moral outcome? No. Is it the

The Importance Of Masculine And Feminine In Dr. Strangelove
Anu Karavadi
Professor Morgan
AMS 421
3 November 2016
1554
The Importance of Masculine and Feminine in Dr. Strangelove
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) is a dark comedy film by Stanley Kubrick. The film deals with
nuclear war which was a hot topic during the 50 's and 60 's. Americans were very paranoid about communists and nuclear war at this time. This film
shows how ridiculous the paranoia about nuclear war through a sexual relationship allegory. The allegory deals with the masculine and the feminine.
The masculine is an important part of the nuclear war efforts while the feminine takes a backseat. The feminine is displayed in men as a negative. The
sexual allegory becomes funny through ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove are all shown as weak and impotent. The characters are either physically handicapped or just weak minded. Mandrake and President both
are represented as meek while Dr. Strangelove is physically impaired in a wheelchair with a prosthetic arm. These characters are all hesitant in some
way to wage war which is shown as a negative. They are seen as incapable when it comes time to take control of the situation. Mandrake couldn 't stop
Jack D. Ripper from launching the nuke. The President couldn 't seize control over his own army. Dr. Strangelove couldn 't control his arm at the very
end. These are all deliberate to show their submissive femininity.
The president and Mandrake are both feminine in their demeanor and personality. They don 't want to go to war, but they also cannot take control
and stop the war. This can be seen as the female of the relationship not wanting sex. This leads those "masculine" men frustrated. The masculine
characters in the film, Buck and Jack D. Ripper, are quite enthusiastic for nuclear war and sex. Their desire for sex and war allows them to go forward
in the war effort in an energetic manner.
Buck is always energetic when talking about the war, so much so, that he literally fights in the war room. Buck wrestles with the Russian diplomat due
to his enthusiasm for war and his sexual frustration. This causes the president to say "There is no fighting in the war room." The movie uses this line for

Compare And Contrast Pakistan And Cold War Essay
Pakistan and India, the two rival states in the dense populated south Asian region engaged in sophisticated arm race just after in short time of their
independence. Both of the nations in the shadow of two different ideologies have bitter relations and the outcome of bitter relation is always ended
in the deadly arm conflicts. Pakistan and India the two infant states were born in the beginning of the cold war just after the end of World War II.
Pakistan joined the western block against the Soviet State to ensure her existence in the survival race with its rival state India. India was economically
well off state and had reliable resources and forces. Pakistan succeeded in acquiring the membership of SEATO and CENTO to meet its defense needs.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The strike will be truly workable and credible deterrence that could be able to maintain the nuclear deterrence posture in the future realm. India is
developing the system to carry out the disarming the strike against Pakistan. The statements were given by MIT scholar Vipin Narang and other Indian
top officials. The Indian strategic thoughts aiming disarming and demolishing Pakistan's first strike nuclear attack arsenal and then a destructive
massive attack from India will be done to accomplish the task of completely destruction of Pakistan's nuclear assets, sites, dams, power stations,
population, public infrastructure and industrial zones. Zameer Akram added more the statement in a seminar was held Geneva organized by Strategic
Vision Institute (SVI) that's called Indian preemptive strike. To have the second–strike capability considers the sustainability of full spectrum
deterrence from Pakistan. India's declared "no first use policy" matters in the rejection of Pakistan's first use policy. Pakistan needs the assured and
precise second–strike capability due to India's growing military expenditure and rapidly increasing military conventional and non–conventional
hardware were acquired by India from USA and Russia. The main concern in a nuclear deterrence is the India's acquisition of ballistic missile defense.

Conflict In Lord Of The Flies Essay
War is the state of conflict and competition between opposing forces. Nonetheless, war can be caused through emotional and psychological issues
through two sides that obtain power from the support of influential followers. William Golding exhibits this perception in the novel, Lord of the
Flies as a plane carrying a group of British schoolboys is shot down over the Pacific during a combat warfare in Europe. In the midst of
consternation and chaos, Ralph, one of the many young boys on the plane, is able to distinguish the fear among the boys and use them as a barrier
to survival. Ralph's leadership is visible from the beginning as he is elected leader of the boys, on the other hand, Jack is cheated out of becoming
the leader as he resembles a militaristic attitude who is greedy to make rules and discipline anyone for breaking his rules. A component of the novel
consists of Ralph and Jack struggling to invest in each others distinct power leading to the boys descending into savagery and the loss of civilization
during the events of the atomic war. Through the background of the atomic war, Golding demonstrates the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After Ralph is inducted as the true leader, Jack branches himself of from the group with his militaristic authority power from Ralph's democracy
power showing the similarities of the democracy East versus the communist West. Consequently, war is used to refer to a threatening situation of
instability rather than two sides of power fighting to win. When one separates itself from a group, the leader and its followers have to be alert of its
own power and the other groups power that can uncover the descendance of savagery and civilization. Conceding that war is a state of conflict, it is a
group's responsibility to hold accountable for its actions of others as a result from its everlasting

Kubbrick's Theory Of Brinksmanship
An alternate title for Kubrick's film was Dr. Doomsday or: How to Start World War III Without Even Trying. A title bluntly stating what the actual title
infers – that America and the Soviet Union had both taken brinksmanship way too far, and were both one slip of the hand away from killing off the
entire human race. By portraying the film in a very comedic fashion, Kubrick was able to show just how ridiculous it was that we allowed the nuclear
clock to come only one minute from midnight.
Imagine two men playing chicken – both driving as fast as they can (obviously in muscle cars) set on a collision course for each other. This
encapsulates the theory of brinksmanship, or trying to achieve an advantageous outcome by pushing dangerous events to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove is the commentary between General Turgidson and President Muffley. In one line Turgidson says to Muffley, "Mr. President, I'm not
saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But I do say... no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops." In this scene, General Turgidson is trying,
unsuccessfully, to convince President Muffley to send all of his nuclear arsenal following the plane sent by General Ripper. To which President
Muffley naturally responds, "I will not go down in history as the greatest mass murderer since Adolf Hitler!" If you have seen the movie, you know
that Turgidson delivers these lines in an optimistic, bordering on giddy tone. Moreover, Turgidson's tone not only exemplifies the absurdity of the
whole situation, but also brings up a very interesting point about the power of a nuclear bomb. Calling ten to twenty million people dead "acceptable
losses" is pretty unbelievable when re–examined. That's one third of the total lives lost in WWII in the blink of an eye. Really, the only reason ten to
twenty million dead could ever be considered "acceptable," is when you are dealing with nuclear warfare – something easily capable of wiping all life
from the face of the earth. This comical commentary between Turgidson and Muffley shows just how abstract the idea of killing that many people must
have been to our leaders, and just how distanced from their constituents

Significance Of The Character Of Sam 's Mother
1B) Discuss the significance of the character of Sam 's mother in Brazil. 300 Words Sam Lowry 's mother, Ida, plays a significant role in the events
of the film Brazil. She was always pushing Sam to better himself by moving up the bureaucratic ladder. This is something that did not interest Sam,
in any way, as he was already fed up with his job and was looking for any excuse to escape this reality. However, she also stood as an example of the
capitalist attitude that was being shared by the people living in Western society. She was another cog in the bureaucratic machine who believed in her
looks to the point of being obsessed with celebrity and plastic surgery. Ida would do anything to keep those in the upper echelon of the government...
Strangelove (Dr. Strangelove) and Felix Hoeniker (Cat 's Cradle) 800 Words The film Dr Strangelove is a political satire as well as a black comedy that
satirizes the Cold War and the fears of people at this time where it concerned nuclear conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States. While
the novel Cat 's Cradle explores issues of science, technology, and religion, satirizing the arms race and many other targets along the way. Both of
these works of media were created in the early 1960s and look to satirize the period and time in which they take place. The main character in the film
Dr. Strangelove, is Dr. Strangelove who represents . While in the novel, Cat 's Cradle, the main character that drives the satire is Felix Hoenikker. Dr.
Strangelove is is an ex–Nazi scientist. He serves as President Muffley 's scientific adviser in the War Room. He accidentally addresses the president as
Mein FГјhrer. The character is an amalgamation of multiple famous Cold War figures such Wernher von Braun, Edward Teller, John von Neumann
and Herman Kahn. He is bound to a wheelchair and is meant to be an intimidating character, who 's ability to intimidate is not affected by his
handicap. The look of Dr. Strangelove is meant to immediately make the audience think mad scientist as it was based on the appearance of mad
scientists from the past. An example of this kind of mad scientist could be found in the film Metropolis. Dr. Strangelove, much like Dr. Rotwang had

Three Approaches To Dealing With North Korea
I personally believe that all three approaches for negotiating with North Korea were inept foreign policies. As all Bill Clinton's administration did was
delay the nuclearizing of North Korea by exchanging oil. Eventually, North Korea abandoned the agreement with Clinton's administration and still
gained economic aid while making the United States looking foolish. The Bush Administration had the right idea about seeking a regime change, but
underestimated North Koreas government cohesion and failed to carry it out properly. Of the three approaches, Obama's method for dealing with North
Korea was the most incompetent. For the Obama administration just simply refused to engage in any negotiations (strategic patience) until North
Korea showed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As a military invasion would be impossible because of what is known as Mutual Assured Destruction. Ever since nuclear weapons were invented
any nation that has obtained them has never gone to war with another country that also has weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, the only
solution to the denuclearization of North Korea would be a regime change. For North Korea is the most sanctioned country in the world and has
remained defiant of denuclearization. Any more sanctions (i.e. Obama's policy) is useless as they will never give into the world's demands.
Consequently, a regime change could occur from the military or a revolution from the peasants. This could be achieved by using stealth bombers to
drop propaganda pamphlets to the North Korean Populous to incite a revolution. Once a Civil War or Coup de ta is instigated then have the U.S.
provide weapons to the opposing side of the current regime. Even if the Civil War or Coup De ta fails the war could last several years. As a result, it
should destabilize the nation and militarily weaken it, which would reduce its nuclear arsenal in the

Mutual Assured Destruction Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Robyn Nelson

More from Robyn Nelson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Mutual Assured Destruction Essay