SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 20
Volume 13 Number 11 1985 Nucleic Acids Research
Further characterization of the extremely small mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs from
trypanosomes: a detailed comparison of the 9S and 12S RNAs from Crithidia fasciculata and
Trypanosoma brucei with rRNAs from other organisms
Paul Sloof, Janny Van den Burg, Arthur Voogd, Rob Benne, Manuela Agostinelli', Piet Borst2,
Robin Gutell3 and Harry Noller3
Section for Molecular Biology, Laboratory of Biochemistry, University of Amsterdam, AMC
Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and 3Thimann Laboratories, University of
California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Received 12 March 1985; Revised and Accepted 7 May 1985
ABSTRACT
We have determined the nucleotide sequence of a maxi-circle segment
from the insect trypanosome Crithidia fasciculata mitochondrial DNA, on
which the genes for the major maxicircle transcripts of 9S and 12S are
localized. The 5'-terminal sequences of these RNAs were determined by
wandering spot analysis. The map coordinates of the 9S and 12S RNAs from
Trypanosoma brucei were adjusted with respect to a previous report with
the aid of primer extension analysis with reverse transcriptase. This
approach allowed us to align the corresponding genes from both organisms
which show an overall sequence homology of 77%. The 9S and 12S RNA genes
from the two trypanosome species contain sequences, closely related to
some of the regions that are universally conserved among ribosomal RNAs
from members of the three primary kingdoms and their organelles, even
though the overall level of sequence homology is extremely low. These
universal sequences occur at positions in the 9S and 12S RNAs that are
analogous to those occupied by their counterparts in authentic ribosomal
RNAs. The characteristic secondary structure elements flanking these
universal sequences in genuine ribosomal RNAs can also be formed in the
trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNAs. These results provide unequivocal evidence
for a ribosomal function of the 9S and 12S RNAs of trypanosomal mitochon-
dria, notwithstanding their extremely small size (estimated to be 612 and
1141 nucleotides in C. fasciculata, 611 and 1150 nucleotides in T.
brucei) and their unusual base composition (83% A+U).
INTRODUCTION
The biologically significant coding capacity of kinetoplast DNA
(kDNA), the extraordinary mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of haemoflagellate
protozoa (1-3), resides in the maxi-circle component (4-10). The
nucleotide sequence has been determined of a major part of the Trypano-
soma brucel maxi-circle. This part contains a set of genes for typical
mtDNA-encoded proteins, c.f. apocytochrome b (lla,llb), the cytochrome c
oxidase subunits I and II (12), unassigned reading frames (11,12), and
the genes for the major maxi-circle transcripts: the 9S and 12S RNAs
(13). These high abundance RNAs occur in equimolar amounts and are not
specifically retained on oligo(dT) cellulose (4), properties which are
©) I RL Press Limited, Oxford, England. 4171
Nucleic Acids Research
shared with mitochondrial ribosomal (r)RNAs from other organisms. A
ribosomal function for the trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNAs has therefore
been suggested (2,4,14). However, direct evidence for this proposal is
still lacking because all attempts to isolate a 9S and 12S PNA containing
ribosomal fraction from trypanosomal mitochondria have sofar been un-
successful (4,15).
A powerful approach to investigate a possible ribosomal function for
the trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNAs is to exploit the extremely high struct-
ural conservation of ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) throughout evolution (16,17).
In a previous report from this laboratory (13) this approach was followed
for the 9S and 12S RNAs of T. brucei leading to the proposal that these
RNAs are the trypanosomal equivalents of mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs
(mtrRNAs). However, this conclusion was only tentative due to the low
degree of sequence homology between 9S and 12S and other rRNAs, which
made it impossible to determine the precise 5'- and 3'-end points of the
9S and 12S RNA genes. We have therefore directly determined the 5'-
terminal sequences of the 9S and 12S RNAs from T. brucei and extended the
analysis- to the insect trypanosome C. fasciculata, from which we have
also cloned and sequenced the 9S and 12S RNA genes. By sequence compar-
ison we have investigated whether putative rRNA-like sequences in 9S and
12S RNAs are conserved among trvpanosomes, and whether possible secondarv
structures can be proven by phylogenetic criteria (18).
In this report we show that a limited number of regions in the
trypanosome 9S and 12S RNAs is homologous to sequences which are highlv
conserved among the members of the three primarv kingdows and their
organelles (18). Moreover, characteristic secondary structures flanking
these conserved sequences can also be formed in trypanosome 9S and 12S
RNAs. From these structural analogies we conclude that the trypanosomal
9S and 12S RNAs are indeed ribosomal RNAs.
Trypanosomes branched from the phylogenetic tree of eukaryotic
organisms at an early stage (19). Since then, trypanosomal mtDNA has
apparently been exposed to different evolutionary pressures compared with
mtDNAs from other eukaryotes and this is emphasized both by its unique
organisation into kDNA and by a low degree of sequence homology with
other mtDNAs (1-3, 11-13). The conserved sequences and their structures
in trypanosomal mtrRNAs may therefore represent basic features of rRNA,
which are the minimal requirements for ribosomal function.
4172
Nucleic Acids Research
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials - Restriction endonucleases were from New England Biolabs
or Boehringer Mannheim; DNA polymerase (large fragment), calf intestine
phosphatase and T4 DNA ligase from Boehringer; Avian myeloblastosis virus
reverse transcriptase from Dr.J.Beard (Life Sciences Inc., St.Petersburg,
Florida, USA); exonuclease Bal-31 from New England Biolabs or Bethesda
Research Laboratories; Low-melting agarose from Bethesda Research
Laboratories.
DNA and RNA - Relevant data on the procedures for Crithidia
fasciculata cultivation and kDNA isolation are described in ref.14 or
refs therein. Total cellular RNA from Trypanosoma brucei strain 427
(culture form) and C. fasciculata were isolated with the LiCl precip-
itation method (20). RNA was stored at -20°C as an ethanol precipitate.
Plasmid and M13RF DNAs were isolated according to ref.21.
Cloning in plasmid and bacteriophage M13 DNA
C. fasciculata kDNA was cleaved with restiction endonuclease HindIII
and the resulting fragments were ligated into plasmid pBR322. From the
HindIII-C. fasciculata maxi-circle bank a clone containing the D5D1
fragment as insert (pD5D1) was selected by size, restriction enzyme
fragmentation pattern and hybridization with T. brucei fragment RR3,
which contains the 9S and 12S RNA genes (4) (see Fig.1). This recombinant
plasmid was used as starting material for the sequence determination.
p(D5D1) was cut with SalI and PstI and the resulting fragments were
separated by electrophoresis on a low melting agarose gel. The 3 kb
fragment S2-PS1 (see Fig.1) was isolated from the gel according to
ref.22. M13 clones containing a varying part of the fragment S2-PS1 were
generated with Bal3l exonuclease using non-random cloning procedures
according to ref.23, except that gel isolation of Bal31 treated fragments
was omitted (see ref.12). The ligation reactions were performed with
vectors treated with calf-intestine phosphatase according to ref.12. This
approach yielded 55 M13 clones containing a series of overlapping inserts
from both strands. These clones were subjected to DNA sequence analysis.
DNA sequence analysis
DNA sequence determination was carried out by the dideoxynucleotide
chain-termination technique (24). In this way a number of overlapping
sequences were obtained from both strands, encompassing the 9S and 12S
Di Figure 1: Physical map of
the C. fasciculata maxi-
Ps1 circle
The 9S and 12S RNAs
were previously mapped on
the EcoRI-HaeIII fragment
R6-E2 (15). The HindIII
fragment D5 DI was cloned in
E. coli with pBR322 as
s<--::'-: 4 6 E2 * < vector. From this clone the
SalI-PstI fragment S2-Psl
32/3032 R2 I was subcloned in bacterio-
/ tX 46 R3 phage M13. Relevant
so
"<"2°-Fsrestriction sites are
2470 30 indicated: HindIII = D;
/Vao7rzEcoRI = R; SalI = S; HaeIII
RK D., ~~~E.
4173
Nucleic Acids Research
RNA genes. In regions where the sequence was ambiguous, reliable
sequences were obtained by priming with specifically constructed syn-
thetic oligonucleotides as primers for DNA synthesis (see ref.25).
5'-termini of 9S and 12S RNAs of C. fasciculata
9S and 12S RNA were separated by gelelectrophoresis and extracted
from the gel. RNA was labelled with ( 32P)-ATP using phage T4 polynucleo-
tide kinase according to ref.26. End-labelled RNA was partially degraded
by nuclease P1 and the oligonucleotides were subjected to electrophoresis
on cellulose acetate followed by homochromatography on DEAE thin layer
plates in the second dimension (27).
5'-termini of 9S and 12S RNAs of T. brucei
Primed cDNA synthesis using synthetic oligonucleotide as primers was
carried out in the presence of dideoxy NTPs as chain terminators, essent-
ially as described (28). The primers were located at a distance of 75-100
nucleotides from the putative 5'-end of the RNAs as determined in Si
nuclease protection experiments (29).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
I The nucleotide sequences of the C. fasciculata 9S and 12S RNA genes and
their alignment with the T. brucei genes
The nucleotide sequence of a C. fasciculata maxi-circle segment
containing 12S and 9S RNA genes, is presented in Fig.2. The 5'-ends of
the corresponding RNAs were directly determined by wandering spot
analysis (Fig.3). The 5'-UUUAUCA sequence for 12S RNA and the 5'-UUUUUAU
sequence for 9S RNA occur only once each in the sequenced maxi-circle
segment. The 5'-ends of the genes in T. brucei were determined by primer
extension analysis with reverse transcriptase (see Fig.4). The 3'-ends of
the 12S and 9S RNA genes of T. brucei were previously determined by S1
protection experiments at positions 1183 and 1807 respectively (29). The
sequence homology in the vicinity of these positions in T. brucei and C.
fasciculata maxi-circle segments drops from 100% to a background value
(Fig.2). From this sequence comparison we deduced the 3'-ends of the 12S
RNA genes at position 1174 in C. fasciculata and at 1181 in T. brucei,
and of the 9S RNA genes at position 1834 and 1810 in C. fasciculata and
T. brucei respectively. This leads to a length of the gene for the C.
fasciculata 12S RNA of 1141 nucleotides (1150 nucleotides in T. brucei)
and for the 9S RNA of 612 nucleotides (611 nucleotides in T. brucei), and
an intergenic region of 48 nucleotides (29 nucleotides in T. brucei).
A comparison of the aligned 9S and 12S RNA gene sequences of T.
brucei and C. fasciculata shows occasional small insertions and deletions
(of 5 bp or less). Sequence divergence of 22% and 24% for the 9S and 12S
RNA genes respectively is limited mostly to individual base replacements,
which are non-randomly distributed along the genes. In the 9S RNA genes
4174
Nucleic Acids Research
T.bruce, -RNA-genes v.s. C. fasctculata rRNA-genes.
gCAr5' 12 at rRNA I.br.
1';&lGTAATCCAA ATTTACCAA ITAAGAA0AA TATtATAATA ATCCCCTCl TATAITTAT- AAlAAATATT TAAA1TCC0I CTACTAAAT1 lAITATTlC
22 TFTIAA1I;A TOAJUA(AI ITAIlTAAA ---AAAlAAIA A-GGTCOCTA lAIAIT0lAA AA6T6TIAA1 ITAAAlTT1G ATIAl(:TTIl lA11I- AA1
S' 128 at rRNA C.fasc.
121 AI1AlTTIAA TAAlAC:GlCl --AITATATT TAAATITTAA ATlTCTTCTI TTlAlAr AG. AIACAAlI1T AIA0ATTAAI -A7ATTTAAA TAAIATTI1A
11/ ThAI ITAlA (A1AITAATT AIAATA1ATT TAAA1AIIAA Al 111 GII TIAIAITTAO TTTAAAAl1l AA1A1ATAAl IAIAAACAAI IlI(AlII AA
218 AAATTTAITG AACTGrAATT ATTAGTTTAA TATTTTTAGT TTGATGTTGA AATATTTAAT TAAACArtGT ACAOTTCTTC TATATGTACC AAATAAArAT
217 AGTTTTAATG AACTOTTATT TATACTTGAT ATTTTTTAOT TTAATGTTTA AATATTTATC TAATAATGTT ACAGTTGTTC TATATGTACC AATAAGAAAr
310 AGlAAGATFA TTTTAGIIA A1TAATAAA7 AAATATT- -T ATTTTTCTIT GTAAATATTA TGAACAATIT AAAAATlAAI CTGlTTAA(T AAAAIQlTAT
3117 AGTAAAATTA TrTTAAITAA TTtAATAAAT ACTIATTGA ATAlIATATI ACAAAIATTA TGAAGTTITT AAAAATtAAA TITTTAAlCi ATTATAAIAI
416 ATATA-AT^A TCTAAGTTAA TTTGAATATT AAAACTACAA GTATAATTTG TAATTCTAAA GTATTTTAAT GGTAtATTTT TAOTAGGTAA ATCAAAAGTA
417 AATTTGCTTA TTAATTTAA ATTGAATATT AAAACTACAA TGCTAAGTTO TGATTTT--T OTTTYTTA--- -GTATATTTT TAGATATTTA ATAAAAACAA
.11' TAAAlGCATA 1AACIIAATA TTTAATATTT GTTTAAT6AA AACGATTTTA TTATfAATAf GIAlAGIATT A7TATAGTCT ATAGITIITI AAAAATATAA
511 -----CTTA AATTTTAATA 7TTAATATfT G IAAAAAAA AAGTOACGAA tTCTAGTAAA AAAAAlTATT TTTAIA---A AlTTATTTIT AAAAAIACAI
615 AAATATTGTT AATAAAATTA TCGTATTTTA AGTGCGTTTA TTAAATGCGT TTGTCTAAGA TAATTATTTA AGATTAFTCT TGTAAATATA TTTAAATATT
603 ATATATTOIT AATAAAATTA TTAAGTTTCA AAAGCGTTTA TTAAATGCGC TTGTCTAACr trtTTATTTA AGATAATTCT TOTATATAGT TITATATTIT
71' AATAATTCTl --AAAAlAAA AAAATAICCT CAATTGCAAl ATTATIGIAG CATACTAAl1 TGITAACTAA ATATTAAAGT TICCATAGA AAAlTtTTAA
70:4 AATAATICTA TTTAATTAAA T7ATACICCT CATAAAATAT CTATAAOTAG CATAGTAAIT TGTTAACTAA TTATTAAAAT GTTCCACAGA AAA1ITTAAA
9 S
813 ATTACAACAA ArAAAATAAA GTATGAATTA ATATCAAAAT TTTAATA ATTAAAAAAT T A CAAGTCC T CCTTTAC AOAACA
803 ATTATAACAA TCAAAGTAAA TAATAAATTA AAATAAAAAT TTTAAAAAAA ATTAAA AT T AG CAOTCC TC CCTTTAC AAAGACAACA
913 T-TAIGATA7 GTAAlTQTAl GTIIGATTG GT CCO TACTA TATTTATTTA TATAGCAIAA GAACtATAIA CTTTGAAATI ATAAAAGr COAC 0011
't0:.4 TA1rTAATAT CTAAlTClAl 7TTGAlITG CC TACCTA TATCTTATTA TATAGAAAAA CAACTATACT TATTGAAAT AT COAC if
1012 AC AIT AAAATAAAT GTQTTTCATC GTCTACTTAT CAT--GA VT TOTTC ATCAAAATAG TAATTCTIG GTTGGOTTAA AATCOTTGTA
1003 AACA ATT AATACTAAAT GrTGTTCATC OTCTACTTAT TAAAAAA TT* TTGTTC ATCAAAAATG CAAT CGT GTTGoGTTA AATCGTTGA
3' 125 at rRNA T.br._5
110O AAGCAGATITrC11 ArAT ITAATTITTA TAArT^A-TA ATAATTAATA T rAC# C AAGGAITGATT ATTGAAAAAA --A-.A
1103 AAGCAOATTT GlTrArATAT TTAATTAGTT AATrTAATTA AGTTTrAATA GTJ OTACCCA GAQlTTAl)rrArtQTIr1r rCAAATCTAA ATTCACAFTA
3' 128 at rRNA C. fasc.
_5 99 at rRNA T. b..
119.' AOAAGAAIAI AA1ITA1ATA AATIAlGCGC AA1TGTTAG7 ATTCATATTA ATTTTTTAA ATGlTITAIC ATT1TATAAA GCTTTA1TtT TGAAACA1fr
;T:4 AATA(ACTAAC AA^AAlAATA TrirTAlG1C AATTCTTATT AITCATATTA AITTTTTTTA AAG1ITTtAA TTITTAlAlI AG1IIA1T-G ACAAACTII
to-; 93 at rRNA C. Fasc.
1;'9. 1110GTA1AAA AT1IIAG0AA 1AGTTAA1AA TAATTTATAA TTTTGATTAG A1TGTTI01I TAA1GCTA1T AGAl-GrU:IG l0GAAAAAIA AAAAAAA1AA
1:I0.1 1I-AAATCTA 11TTAGGAA TAG1TAAIAA TA1TTTATAA 7ICIGAllAG ATTACA1TG1 TACIOCIATA TAAAGGG(;1G T0GAAAlIC1 ACICAAA1A7
1391 TTAATATATA TCAATAATAA ATTAAA1TAA TCTAT---TA GTCACAAATG TOCCACC QTTGCITTAA ITTCTATGCr TtrAAATAFT ATACAATTAT
* * & * **-***** **** *-** * * * *§****1*-*-********** 44 *-*-**** **** ***** -****
1401 AATAAAT^At TATATAAtAA ATTACATTAr TTACrAACCA GTCAOAAATG GTGCCACCC 0TT0CCCTAA 1TCTATQCT IITAAAtATT AtACATTTAT
1411 (.CA1AlIAAAl IGlIAAG1OC 10- -AIIAA CCAA1AAAAA 1A1AAA1AAI TVTTA1TIGT lITTAAACAC CAIrAG0lAl A7GCAAA1AI rAAAIAIAAG
1101 lIAAATTlTICAC TAA AIAliTTIAGCCAA1TAAAA CAIAlGITIT CGlTAITT1T TIITAAACA(. CCAlIOClAl A1CCAAATI AAAMIGACA1r
1386 TAAl TATAAA r AATT TATA TTATATTTAT TCATATAATT AATAGGATAA TAITTGTACT TTTFGAoACC ATGATOAACA TTATAAATrG AAACrcITAA******** ****-*-* *0 ** *0 **** *-** *00 -t* -**000 -*** *** * -*** 0*
16.01 TAATTATT ^TTATATTAIT TTATATITAT TCAAATTGTT A _AAATAAA AATTTATOTA ATTTGACACC ATGAAAACGA CTATCAAT-G ATAITGTAAA
11411. IACAAlAlAC AAAAlITATT AITTAlAIIA AAlAlCTAlG lAGIAAA AAACTA GAATf TA lC(((AC CltA1IITAl AAIAAAA
* **&**-** * * *----- - ** - - * **---*-- - * - *** ***** *****^*-*-***e* ******g o
1/50 lITtAlAAIC AAAAlIAACl TAlT^TAl(A AA^AAGCAA1 AIAGATAAA AAGACA1T C ClIIIIAl AA1AAAAA1I
C 3' 93 *at rRNA T.br.-O
I /1t1. ACCCClA I+lAlAl IAAAAAA AATFTTAC IAAATTACAA A(./Al71AA7 AAlIIAA(.-11111CA-I.A.Il 1.
11400 AltCC^GTl lCAAC lIVA AAAA ^CAIIAAA7A CAAAACACCT CTCACAlIKAC GICIC1CAI A1T(AAA(( C.fac &&.1at.1
3' 95 et rRNA C. fsc.aaJ
4175
Figure 2: Aligned maxi-circle DNA segments, containing the 12S and 9S RNA
genes from T. brucei and C. fasciculata.
The sequence of the T. brucei maxi-circle DNA segment containing the
9S and 12S genes (top line) is algined with the corresponding maxi-circle
DNA Segment from C. fasciculata (bottom line). Identified universal
sequences are boxed and indicated as in Tables II and III.
Nucleic Acids Research
4p: {a ': i
*-u~~~~~
qwu
_MA
*U
,,.Li.
C
.*.A ij
44
Figure 3: 5'-end determination of C. fasciculata 12S and 9S RNAs.
C. fasciculata 12S and 9S RNAs were purified electrophoretically and
subjected to wandering spot analysis as described in Methods. (a) Auto-
radiogram of 12S RNA. (b) Autoradiogram of 9S RNA.
mutations are considerably less frequent in the regions 1427-1482 and
1747-1801 (T. brucei coordinates), whereas in the 12S RNA gene the
3'-terminal region is well conserved (T. brucei coordinates 759-1180).
These highly homologous regions harbour sequences and potential secondary
structures that are recognizable analogues of conserved secondary
structural elements of rRNA as described in refs. 16 and 17 (see below).
Analysis of sequence divergence in protein-coding genes, tRNA- and
rRNA-genes of human and bovine mtDNA, has shown that transitions appear
more frequently than transversions (30). This tendency has also been
observed in a comparison of the mitochondrial rRNA genes of two Para-
mecium subspecies (31,32). In trypanosome 9S and 12S RNA genes trans-
versions are more prominent (15% and 16% of the bases for the 9S and 12S
RNA genes respectively) than transitions (5% of the bases for both genes)
(see Table I). This may be a reflection of the extreme bias towards A+T
in mtDNA of trypanosomes (83% in both 9S and 12S RNA genes). The
percentage sequence difference between the 9S and 12S RNA genes of the
two trypanosome species (about 23%, see Table I) is as large as between
the mtrRNA genes of Human and Cow (30). Assuming an equal rate of
sequence evolution in mtrRNA genes of mammals and of trypanosomes we
4176
Nucleic Acids Research
A
A~
Ac
A
Tv :
Tc asbr w
C
fi A t C 0
..
_
x
A
A
A
A
T
a
Al
A
T
T
C
T
T
G A T C 0
12S
Figure 4: 5'-end determination of 9S and 12S rRNA from T. brucei.
cDNA synthesis using a synthetic dodecadeoxyribonucleotide
primer, carried out as described in Methods. Primers were:
12S RNA- 5'-TTTACTACACGG-3' (complementary to 97-108, see Fig.2).
9S RNA- 5'-ATTAACTATTCC-3' (complementary to 1308-1319, see Fig.2).
as
speculate that the divergence time for C. fasciculata and T. brucei is
the same as for Human and Cow, namely 80x10 years (33).
II Structural relationship between trypanosome 9S RNA and small subunit
ribosomal RNA
In order to determine structural relationships between the
TABLE I MICRO EVOLUTION OF TRYPANOSOME 9S AND 12S RNAs
Gene
Type of mutation 9S RNA 12S RNA
Transition 36 ( 5.8) 66 ( 5.7)
Transversion 91 (14.8) 180 (15.8)
Deletion/Insertion 9 ( 1.6) 32 ( 2.8)
Mutations total 136 (22.2) 278 (24.3)
The T. brucei and C. fasciculata mitochondrial 9S and 12S RNA genes
were aligned (see Fig.2) and the observed differences tabulated
according to the type of mutation. Numbers in parentheses represent
the percentage of bp's of the given gene with the respective mutation.
4177
O*_
a
9S
6 A T C G A T c 0
Nucleic Acids Research
TABLE II CONSERVED SEQUENCES IN TRYPANOSOME 9S RNA
Position Sequence Small subunit rRNA
(a) 515 - GUGCCAGCAGCCGCGGUAAU E.coli (16)
GUGCCAGCARYCGCGGUA-AY ConsensusC C
1439
AUGCCAGCCGUUGCGGUAAU T.brucei (13);
1452 C.fasciculata
* * Transitions
(b) 1391 - UGUACACAC8GCCCGUC E.coli (16)
YGYAC AAYYRCYCRUC Consensus
1750) AGGUAUUGUUGCCCACC T.brucei (13);
1764 C.fasciculata
* *** Transversions
* * Transitions
(c) 1492 - AAGUCGUAACAAGGU E.coli (16)
AAGUYGMCAYAXRGU ConsensusUC
1785
AACGUGCAGUAAUUA T.brucei (13);
1799 C.fasciculata
** *** Transversions
* * Transitions
Conserved sequences from trypanosome 9S RNA are shown aligned with their
homologues which are universal in the 16S-like rRNAs of the three major
kingdoms (typified by E. coli). Consensus sequences take into consider-
ation the corresponding regions from mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs
from Paramecium (31); Yeast (46); Aspergillus (47); Maize (48); Human
(49); Cow (30); Mouse (50); Rat (51) and Mosquito (only in (b) and (c);
ref.37)
R = purine; Y = pyrimidine; X = purine or pyrimidine; * indicates
positions at which a transition or transversion occurred in trypanosome
9S RNA with respect to the consensus sequence; o indicates the position
at which a P-site tRNA has been cross-linked to E. coli 16S rRNA (35).
trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNA and rRNAs three approaches have been
followed:
(i) A search in trypanosome 9S and 12S RNAs for universal sequences
found in all rRNAs (see ref.18); (ii) a search for conserved purine-
pyrimidine sequences; and (iii) a search for secondary structure elements
conserved in all rRNAs.
It has been shown for T. brucei that the level of sequence homology
4178
Nucleic Acids Research
e- >
- U ..
AJ-F Fl,4L %) GAFtu uA
GC: d G Li9 J
pl-H R u
U
S - -i22
A
U
UiAi A
G U
u
A
U - AXu -
u
6 R AU-fg
A-U
U ~ICIIij.;uiA R 9
q
aAALU
G 1A U
f O U U
IZIA A
G- 'U
U A
b U
IcR
c
23
A
~~~~AUG RC"U
AU AAUACU
U-U
A
Figure 5: Conserved secondary structure features in trypanosome 9S RNA.
The sequences of relevant C. fasciculata 9S RNA regions are given.
Conserved sequences a,b and c, specified in Table II, are boxed. Constant
nucleotides are shaded. Differences with the corresponding T. brucei 9S
RNA regions are indicated by encircled nucleotides for base replacements.
A diagram of E. coli 16S rRNA is given for reference.
between the trypanosome 9S RNA and small subunit rRNA from either E. coli
or mitochondria from a variety of organisms is low (13). However, one
region (C. fasciculata 1452-1471) shows considerable homology to a highly
conserved region of rRNA (E. coli 515-534) (16). In order to take the
degree of variability in this universal sequence into account, we have
derived a consensus sequence using the 515-534 region of E. coli 16S rRNA
and corresponding regions in mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs from a
number of organisms. A comparison of the corresponding trypanosome 9S RNA
region with the consensus sequence shows only two transition mutations
(see Table II, panel a).
Since the secondary structure of this region and flanking sequences
(E. coli positions 500-545) is also highly conserved in the 16S-like rRNA
from all organisms and organelles (16,34), we have investigated trypano-
some 9S RNA in this respect. Fig.5 shows that such a secondary structure
is possible. By analogy with the model for E. coli 16S rRNA (16,34), the
conserved primary sequence (E. coli 515-534 / C. fasciculata 1452-1471)
4179
Nucleic Acids Research
is contained in the apex loop of a hairpin structure. The helical stem is
interrupted on the 5'-side by a 6 nucleotide bulge loop (5 nucleotides in
trypanosomes) containing two adjacent A residues at characteristic
positions for rRNA (E. coli AA510) (16). The upper part of the helical
stem consists of 7 base paired residues (6 in T. brucei) as in all
16S-like rRNAs (16), and the lower part is formed by 3 bp's (5 bp's in E.
coli). In close proximity to the 3'-side of this conserved structural
element, another conserved structural feature is found: E. coli 27-37 /
547-556. This helical stem is generally irregular and of variable
sequence. In trypanosomes a similar irregular helical stem can be formed
(C. fasciculata 1485-1494 / 1241-1251) (Fig.5). In this stem, one base
replacement (C. fasciculata U1473 - T. brucei is observed.
Because of the abnormally high A/U bias observed in trypanosome
9S/12S RNAs, we carried out a search for sequence homology with rRNA
sequences after generalizing G, A, C and U to either purines or pyrimi-
dines. This was based on the premise that transitions occurring at a high
frequency could obscure any search for absolute sequence homology. This
approach led to the identification of two regions of high homology
proximal to the 3'terminal part of trypanosome 9S RNA (see Table II-b and
c).
The first region corresponds to positions 1391-1407 of E. coli 16S
rRNA and shows 4 transversions and two transitions with respect to the
latter (see Table II-b). This E. coli 16S rRNA region is located at the
subunit interface (18). Furthermore, the anticodon of a P site-bound tRNA
has been cross-linked to C1400, indicating that codon-anticodon recog-
nition occurs in close proximity to this position (35). A C-U transition
is found at this position in trypanosome 9S RNA (see Table II), as in the
mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs of two Paramecium subspecies (31).
Transversions occur at the 5'-flank of this pyrimidine, while in the
3'-flanking sequence only the penultimate residue shows a transitional
difference (Table II). This suggests that in E. coli the 16S rRNA
sequence most crucial to the codon-anticodon recognition process includes
positions located directly 3' to C1400.
The second region shows strong homology to positions 1492-1503 of E.
coli 16S rRNA, also located at the subunit interface (18). Trypanosome 9S
RNA shows a greater divergence from the consensus here than for the other
two universal sequences (Table Il-c). However, as is shown below, this
entire 3'-terminal region of 9S RNA can be folded in a fashion closely
4180
Nucleic Acids Research
resembling the model proposed for the 3'-terminal region of E. coli 16S
rRNA.
Two universal sequences (E. coli 1391-1407 and 1492-1503) exist in a
single stranded conformation in 16S rRNA (16) and are embedded in a
characteristic set of helices (16,36). Upstream from E. coli position
1391 a long range interaction occurs (16) whereas between the two
universal sequences a helical stem is found which varies in length
between 7 bp (in Mosquito mitochondria, ref.37) and 49 bp (in the Rat
cytoplasm, ref.38). A 3'-terminal helical stem is present in all small
subunit rRNAs (16,36). This characteristic configuration can also be
drawn for trypanosomal 9S RNA (Fig.5). A long-range interaction between
1762-1759 / 1714-1717 (C. fasciculata), containing one compensating base
replacement relative to T. brucei at position 1716/1760, can be formed
adjacent to the conserved sequence 1764-1780 (Table II). Between this
conserved sequence and the conserved region 1799-1813 (C. fasciculata;
Table II) a helical stem containing 7 basepairs can be drawn at precisely
the predicted position. At the 3'-end of C. fasciculata 9S RNA a helical
stem analogous to the 3'-terminal helix of 16S-like rRNAs can be formed
which exhibits two compensating base changes relative to T. brucei 9S RNA
(see Fig.5), proving their existence in vivo according to phylogenetic
criteria (18). In Crithidia this helical region is interrupted, as also
is observed in the mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs of two Paramecium
subspecies (31). This interruption at A1817 / A1830 does not occur in T.
brucei which has an A-U pair at this position. The position of the
helical stem, its length (9 bp) and the number of residues in the loop (4
nucleotides) closely resemble the 3'-terminal helix found in all small
subunit rRNAs (16). However, the conserved (A-U/U-G) part of the stem
(39) at position: 1513-1522/1512-1523 of E. coli is not present in
trypanosomes and from the conserved GGAA or UGAA sequences in the loop
only the adjacent A residues are found in trypanosome 9S RNA. The
adjacent A residues at this position are methylated in all rRNAs and are
found unmethylated in kasugamycin resistant mutants (39). The nucleotide
sequences in this conserved secondary structure element in small subunit
rRNAs are related and have been used to construct a scheme of possible
evolutionary links between bacteria, eukaryotic cytoplasms, mitochondria
and chloroplasts (39). The nucleotide sequence of this element in trypa-
nosome 9S RNA does not fit in this scheme of related sequences which
provides evidence that trypanosomal 9S RNA has been exposed to a
4181
Nucleic Acids Research
(b)
e i
769
Figure 6: The conserved secondary
structure of the 769-810 (E.coli)
region of the central domain of small
subunit rRNA
The number of nucleotides in
single- or double-stranded conform-
ation for this region in E. coli, and
a consensus of the corresponding
region for mitochondrial small subunit
rRNA from Paramecium (32), Yeast (46),
Aspergillus (47), Maize (48), Human
810 (49), Cow (30), Mouse (50), and Rat
(51) is given in (a). A schematic
drawing of this region is given in (b)
and regions of T. brucei and C. fasci-
culata 9S RNA, fulfilling the criteria
formulated in the consensus are
presented in (a).
different evolutionary pressure than mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs of
other organisms.
From the identification of these three highly conserved small
subunit rRNA sequences at analogous positions in trypanosome 9S RNA and
from the potential of their flanking regions to form secondary structures
closely analogous to that proposed for 16S-like rRNA (16) we conclude
that 9S RNA is the trypanosome equivalent of mitochondrial small subunit
rRNA. Therefore, we have searched for additional conserved secondary
structure elements in trypanosome 9S RNA. A candidate is the 769-810 area
(E. coli) which contains a constant secondary structure present in all
rRNAs (see Fig.6). In a matrix plot of all possible base-pairing inter-
actions within C. fasciculata 9S RNA, the only combination of single
stranded and helical regions that fulfilled the criteria listed in Fig.6,
is located between positions 1671-1705. In C. fasciculata the loop
contains 8 residues (in T. brucei: 9 nucleotides) with the first stem
being 3 bp, the second 6 bp in length, containing respectively one and
4182
(a) Small subunit rRNA Number of
nucleotides in Base pairs in
a b c d e
E. coli 769-810 9 7 4 4 7
Consensus 9 6-8 3-5 3-4 6-8
T. brucei 9 6 3 3 6
C. fasciculata 1671-1705 8 6 3 3 6
Nucleic Acids Research
two compensating base replacements relative to T. brucei. The two helical
regions are interrupted by an internal loop containing 6 nucleotides on
the 5'-side and 3 nucleotides on the 3'-side, within the range of size
variation observed for the consensus structure (Fig.6). The possibility
of folding this region into a rRNA-like structure as well as its position
relative to the other conserved rRNA sequences, suggest this region as a
possible candidate for the characteristic 790 region of the central
domain of small subunit rRNAs.
In comparison with mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs from other
organisms the trypanosome 9S RNAs are the smallest characterized thus
far. The most drastic size reductions in 9S RNA relative to E. coli 16S
rRNA have occurred in the (E. coli) areas: 38-500 (58%); 810-926 (94%)
933-1383 (91%) and 1409-1491 (80%). These regions are phylogenetically
the most variable; in mammalian mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs the
size reductions also occur within these regions (16). Among the conserved
sequences found in small subunit rRNA, the three regions identified in
trypanosome 9S RNA correspond to the most highly conserved ones (16).
This implies that the other conserved sequences are deleted. However, a
drastic change in their sequence or the possibility that they have never
been present in trypanosomes cannot be excluded.
III Structural relationship between trypanosome 12S RNA and large subunit
rRNA
Some highly conserved sequences, located in the functionally
important 3'-terminal region of all large subunit rRNAs (17,34) (domains
V and VI of E. coli 23S rRNA, ref.17) are also found in the 3'-terminal
region of trypanosome 12S RNA.
First, a 12-nucleotide sequence, which contains the ac-sarcin
cleavage site, implicated in the binding of the EF-l.GTP.aa-tRNA ternary
complex (40,41) is present at an analogous position in trypanosome 12S
RNA, with only one transition base replacement with respect to the
consensus (see Table III-a). This region can be folded in a secondary
structure, exposing the putative ct-sarcin cleavage site in the apex loop,
as has been determined for E. coli and Bacillus stearothermophilus (42)
(see Fig.7). However, phylogenetic evidence for such folding in trypano-
somes is lacking because of the high sequence homology between T. brucei
and C. fasciculata in this area of 12S RNA.
Second, in E. coli the site on 23S rRNA which is located at the
peptidyl transferase center has been identified recently (43) in a
4183
Nucleic Acids Research
r.U
C --9u
_; U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C ..14G~~~~~~~~
in>
uCV
Un6
Figure 7: Secondary structure of the 3 -terminal region of trypanosome
12S RNA.
The C. fasciculata sequence is given. Conserved sequences a,b,c,d,e,
f and g, specified in Table III, are boxed. Constant nucleotides are
shaded. Differences with the corresponding T. brucei 12S RNA region are
indicated by encircled nucleotides for base replacements and by encircled
X's for deletions.
A diagram of the secondary structure of the corresponding region of
23S rRNA of E. coli (domains V and VI) is given for reference.
conserved 11 nucleotide sequence. This sequence is also present in
trypanosome 12S RNA at a unique and analogous location (see Table III-b).
Further support for the involvement of this region of 12S RNA in peptidyl
transferase activity comes from a comparison with two rRNA sequences
associated with the sensitivity of protein synthesis towards chloram-
phenicol (CAP), an antibiotic that inhibits peptidyl transferase activity
4184
Nucleic Acids Research
(44) (see Table III-c). Although these regions of trypanosome 12S RNA
differ in sequence their homology with sequences in the peptidyl trans-
ferase region is nevertheless clearly apparent. Since mutants in these
sequences in yeast and mammalian mitochondria confer chloramphenicol
resistance, trypanosome mitoribosomes might be expected to show CAP
resistance. Indeed, protein synthesis in trypanosomes appears to be
resistant to CAP (29). Also the region of 23S rRNA associated with
erythromycin sensitivity (45), can be identified in trypanosome 12S RNA
in a slightly altered form (see Table III-g). This observation is
consistent with the absence of erythromycin-sensitive protein synthesis
in trypanosomes (29). Finally, three other conserved sequences in the 3'-
terminal region have been identified (see Table III-d,e,f).
Using these sequences as landmarks in folding excercises on trypa-
nosome 12S RNA we find that a secondary structure can be drawn which is
similar to the 3'-terminal region of E. coli 23S rRNA (17) (see Fig.7).
The putative CAP region, erythromycin region and the three other con-
served regions (see Table III) can be positioned in analogous locations
in the secondary structure model (Fig.7). Furthermore, a long-range RNA
interaction (C. fasciculata 867-882/1130-1116) analogous to E. coli
2057-2043/2625-2611 is possible linking the putative Ct-sarcin region
(Table III-a) and other conserved sequences (Tables III-b-g) as in the E.
coli model (17). However, conclusive phylogenetic evidence for this
folding in trypanosomes, is lacking because of the high sequence homology
between T. brucei and C. fasciculata in this area on the one hand, and
the extreme sequence divergence with respect to the large subunit rRNAs
from other organisms and organelles on the other. From the presence of
conserved large subunit rRNA-like sequences in the 3'-half of 12S RNA and
from the possibility of folding this area in a closely homologous fashion
to 23S rRNAs we conclude that 12S RNA is the trypanosomal equivalent of
mitochondrial large subunit rRNA.
The trypanosome 12S RNAs are the smallest mitochondrial large
subunit rRNAs characterized thusfar. The 3'-terminal region of 12S RNA is
only 315 nucleotides long, whereas the equivalent region in E. coli 238
rRNA, domains V and VI, spans 862 nucleotides. The size reduction of this
region in trypanosome 12S RNA relative to E. coli 23S rRNA, is not evenly
distributed. Some parts are constant while others are drastically reduced
in size or are eliminated. The functionally important central part of
this region, in which some sequences are identified that are involved in
4185
Nucleic Acids Research
TABLE III CONSERVED SEQUENCES IN TRYPANOSOME 12S RNA
Position Sequence Large subunit rRNA
a) 2655 - GUACGAGAGGAC E. coli (17)
GUACGARAGGAG Consensus
C C
1162) GUACGCAAGGAU T. brucei (13)
1156 C. fasciculata
* Transition
b)
2577 - AGCUGGG8flUA E. coli (17)
AGGUCGGUUAC Consensus
1089 AGUUGGGWAA T. brucei (13);
1082 C. fasciculata
c) 2698
2445 - GGGAUAACAG---ACCUCGAUGU E. coli (17)
C
RGGAUAACAG---ACCUCG UGU Consensus
1053
1007 - AGGUUAACAA---ACCAUGAUUG T. brucei (13)
* * Transitions
* * ** Transversions
1044
AA
998 - AGGUUAACAA---GCUA AUUG C. fasciculata
* * * * Transitions
* ** Transversions
** Insertions
d) 2430 - AUAAAAGGU E. coli (17)
UCAA G Consensus
992 AUAAAAGGU
T. brucei (13);
989 C. fasciculata
e) 2071 - ACCUUUAC E. coli (17)
ACCA A Consensus
895> UCCUWAC T. brucei (13);
885 C. fasciculata
* Transitions
4186
Nucleic Acids Research
TABLE III (continued)
Position Sequence Large subunit rRNA
f) 2242 - GUUUGACUGGGGCG E. coli (17)
c
UUY YGGGGYR Consensus
932
GUUWGAUWGGGGCA T. brucei (13);
923 C. fasciculata
g) 2053 - GACGGAAAGACCC E. coli (17)
RACGRRAAGACCC Consensus
878 UAGGGCAAGUCCU T. brucei (13);
868 C. fasciculata
* Transitions
* * * * Transversions
Conserved sequences from trypanosome 12S RNA are shown aligned with their
homologues which are universal in the 23S-like rRNAs from the three major
kingdoms (typified by E. coli). Consensus sequences take into consider-
ation the corresponding regions from mitochondrial large subunit rRNAs
from Paramecium (31); Yeast (46); Aspergillus (52); Maize (48); Human
(49); Cow (30); Mouse (50); Mosquito (53).
R = purine; Y = pyrimidine; X = purine or pyrimidine; * indicates
positions at which a transition, transversion or insertion occurs in the
trypanosome 12S RNA with respect to the consensus sequence; o indicates
the position where the aminoacyl end of P-site tRNA has been cross-linked
to 23 S rRNA of E. coli (43).
antibiotic resistance/sensitivity of protein synthesis and are in the
vicinity of the ribosomal P-site, has about the same size in all
organisms and organelles, including trypanosome mitochondria (indicated
by the shaded area in the insert of Fig.7). Helices, protruding from this
central part, are considerably reduced in size or are eliminated in all
mitochondrial large subunit rRNAs. In trypanosome 12S RNA, however, the
size reduction of these helices is most extreme.
We have not found extensive structural homologies between the
5'-terminal region of large subunit rRNA and the analogous region of
trypanosomal 12S RNA. This is due to the extreme sequence divergence
between trypanosome 12S RNA with respect to other rRNAs. The functionally
important UAGCUGG WU-811 (E. coli) region, which is conserved in all
eubacterial, chloroplast, mitochondrial and eukarvotic cytoplasmic
ribosomes is not recognizable in trypanosome 12S RNA. It has been
proposed that the 3'-CCA of tRNA, which binds to the ribosome, interacts
with the UGG in this conserved sequence (43). Absence of this RNA region
in trypanosomal mitoribosomes would suggest that such a mode of tRNA
4187
Nucleic Acids Research
binding does not occur, at least not in this organelle or that tRNAs may
not have CCA at their 3'-termini in trypanosome mitochondria. Since
precise positioning of the 3'-ends of tRNA molecules on the ribosome is
obviously crucial for the peptidyl transferase reaction, it is possible
that in trypanosome mitoribosomes this is accomplished in some other way.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
From comparisons with primary and secondary structures of authentic
rRNAs we conclude that the trypanosomal 9S and 12S mitochondrial RNAs are
true ribosomal RNAs, albeit strange ones with respect to size, nucleotide
sequence, base composition and gene organization. This is attributable in
part to a different evolutionary pressure imposed on trypanosomal mtDNA,
compared with mtDNA of other organisms. In addition, mitochondrial
sequence evolution can be much faster than the evolution of nuclear
sequences (33). Nevertheless, a few universal sequences and secondary
structure elements have been highly conserved in trypanosome mitochon-
drial rRNAs. These ancient sequences and structures must therefore be
considered as fundamental to the translation process. Universal sequences
that are absent in trypanosome 9S and 12S RNAs may represent elements
that are either not necessary in trypanosome mitochondrial protein
synthesis or for which the trypanosome mitoribosome has developed its own
equivalents. The above mentioned unique features of trypanosome mitochon-
drial rRNAs, the fact that chloramphenicol- or erythromycin-sensitive and
cycloheximide-resistant protein synthesis have not been demonstrated in
trypanosomes (29), and all attempts to purify ribosomes from trypanosome
mitochondria by standard procedures have failed (4,15), lead us to expect
that trypanosome mitoribosomes will prove to be most exceptional.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We appreciate the help of Dr.J.Bol and Mr.F.Brederode from the State
University Leiden, The Netherlands and Ms.B.Klaver in 5'-end determ-
ination of RNA. We thank Drs. L.A.Grivell and H.F.Tabak for critically
reading of the manuscript, Drs.B.F.De Vries for assistance in the pre-
paration of figures 5 and 7 and Ms.T.Scholts for expert typing.
P.S. acknowledges EMBO for a short term fellowship. H.N. thanks K.Katze
for discussions, and the U.S.National Institutes of Health (grant no. GM
17129) for support.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed
'Present address: Instituto di Fisiologie, Universite degli Studi, P.Aldo Moro 5, 0100 Roma, Italy
2Present address: The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
4188
Nucleic Acids Research
REFERENCES
1. Simpson, L. (1972) Intern.Rev.Cytol. 32, 139-207.
2. Borst, P. and Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. (1979) Plasmid 2, 20-40.
3. Englund, P.T. (1981) in: Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa (Levandovsky, M. and
Hutner, S.H., Eds), 2nd edn. Vol.4, Academic Press, New York, pp.334-383.
4. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., Snijders, A., Janssen, J.W.G. and Borst, P. (1981) Plasmid 5,
329-350.
5. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. and Borst, P. (1978) Biochim.Biophys.Acta 521, 407-411.
6. Simpson, L. and Simpson, A.M. (1978) Cell 14, 169-178.
7. Simpson, A.M. and Simpson, L. (1980) Mol.Biochem.Parasitol. 2, 93-108.
8. *Stuart, K.D. and Gelvin, S.B. (1982) Mol.Cell.Biol. 2, 845-852.
9. Simpson, A.M., Simpson, L. and Livingston, L. (1982) Mol.Biochem. Parasitol. 6,
237-252.
10. Borst, P., Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., Hajduk, S.O. (1981) Parasitology 82, 81-93.
lla. Benne, R., De Vries, B.F., Van den Burg, J. and Klaver, B. (1983) Nucl.Acids Res. 11,
6925-6941.
llb. Johnson, B.J.B., Hill, G.C. and Donelson, J.E. (1984) Mol.Biochem. Parasitol. 13,
135-146.
12. Hensgens, L.A.M., Brakenhoff, J., De Vries, B.F., Sloof, P., Tromp, M.C., Van Boom,
J.H. and Benne, R. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12, 7327-7344.
13. Eperon, I.C., Janssen, J.W.G., Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. and Borst, P. (1983) Nucl.Acids
Res. 11, 105-125.
14. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., Schoutsen, B., Borst, P. (1982) Plasmid 7, 199-209.
15. Stuart, K. (1983) Mol.Biochem.Parasitol. 9, 93-104.
16. Woese, C.R., Gutell, R., Gupta, R. and Noller, H.F. (1983) Microbiol.Rev. 47, 621-669.
17. Noller, H.F., Kop, J., Wheaton, V., Brosius, J., Gutell, R., Kopylov, A.M., Dohme, F.,
Herr, W., Stahl, D.A., Gupta, R. and Woese, C.R. (1981) Nucl.Acids Res. 9, 6167-6189.
18. Noller, H.F. (1984) Ann.Rev.Biochem. 53, 119-162.
19. Huysmans, E., Dams, E., Vandenberghe, A. and De Wachter, R. (1983) Nucl.Acids Res.
11, 2871-2880.
20. Auffray, C. and Rougeon, F. (1980) Eur.J.Biochem. 107, 303-314.
21. Birnboim, H.C. and Doly, J. (1979) Nucl.Acids Res. 7, 1513-1523.
22. Smith, H.O. (1980) In: Methods in Enzymology 65 (Grossman, L. and Moldave, K., Eds)
Academic Press, New York, pp. 371-380.
23. Poncz, M., Solowiejczyk, D., Ballantine, M., Schwartz, E. and Surrey, S. (1982) Proc.
Natl.Acad.Sci . U.S. 79, 4298-4302.
24. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulson, A.R. (1977) Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci.U.S. 74,
5463-5467.
25. Van der Marel, G.A., Marugg, J.E., De Vroom, E., Wille, G., Tromp, M., Van Boeckel,
C.A.A. and Van Boom, J.H. (1982) Recl.Trav.Chim. Pays-Bas 101, 234-241.
26. Donis-Keller, H., Maxam, A.M., Gilbert, W. (1977) Nucl.Acids Res. 4, 2527-2538.
27. Silberklang, M., Prochiantz, A., Haenni, A.L. and Rajbhandary, U.L. (1977) Eur.J.Bio-
chem. 72, 465-478.
28. Van der Ploeg, L.H.T., Liu, A.Y.C., Michels, P.A.M., De Lange, T.,
Borst, P., Majumder, H.K., Weber, H., Veeneman, G.H. and Van Boom, J.H. (1982) Nucl.
Acids Res. 10, 3591-3604.
29. Benne, R., Agostinelli, M., De Vries, B.F., Van den Burg, J., Klaver, B. and Borst, P.
(1983) In: Mitochondria: Nucleo-Mitochondrial Interactions (Schweyen, R.J., Wolf, K.
and Kaudewitz, F., Eds) De Gruyter, Berlin, pp.285-302.
30. Anderson, S., De Bruijn, M.H.L., Coulson, A.R., Eperon, I.C., Sanger, F. and Young,
I.G. (1982) J.Mol.Biol. 156, 683-717.
31. Seilhamer, J.J., Olsen, G.J. and Cummings, D.J. (1984) J.Biol.Chem. 259, 5167-5172.
32. Seilhamer, J.J., Gutell, R.R., Cuaings, D.J. (1984) J.Biol.Chem. 259, 5173-5181.
33. Brown, W.M., Prager, E.M., Wang, A. and Wilson, A.C. (1982) Mol. Evol. 18, 225-239.
34. Maly, P. and Brimacombe, R. (1983) Nucl.Acids Res. 11, 7263-7286.
35. Prince, J.B., Taylor, B.H., Thurlow, D.L., Ofengand, J. and Zimmermann, R.A. (1982)
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S. 79, 5450-5454.
4189
Nucleic Acids Research
36. Douthwaite, S., Christensen, A., Garrett, R.A. (1983) J.Mol.Biol. 169, 249-279.
37. Dubin, D.T. and HsuChen, C.C. (1983) Plasmid 9, 307-320.
38. Chan, Y.L., Gutell, R., Noller, H.P. and Wool, I.G. (1984) J.Biol. Chem. 259, 224-230.
39. Van Knippenberg, P.H., Van Kimmenade, J.M.A. and Heus, H.A. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12,
2595-2604.
40. Chan, Y.L., Endo, Y. and Wool, I.G. (1983) J.Biol.Chem. 258, 12768-12770.
41. Schindler, D.G. and Davies, J.E. (1977) Nucl.Acids Res. 4, 1097-1110.
42. Garrett, R.A., Christensen, A. and Douthwaite, S. (1984) J.Mol.Biol. 179, 689-712.
43. Barta, A., Steiner, G., Brosius, J., Noller, H.F. and Kuechler, E. (1984) Proc.Natl.
Acad.Sci.U.S. 81, 3607-3611.
44. Monro, R.E., Staehelin, T., Celma, M.L. and Vazquez, D. (1969) Cold Spring Harbor
Symp.Quant.Biol. 34, 357.
45. Sor, F. and Fukuhara, H. (1982) Nucl.Acids Res. 10, 6571-6577.
46. Li, M., Tzagoloff, A., Underbrink-Lyon, K. and Martin, N.C. (1982) J.Biol.Chem. 257,
5921-5928.
47. K5chel, H.G. and Kfintzel, H. (1981) Nucl.Acids Res. 9, 5689-5696.
48. Chao, S., Sederoff, R. and Levings, C.S. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12, 6629-6644.
49. Eperon, I.C., Anderson, S., Nierlich, D.P. (1980) Nature 286, 460-467.
50. Van Etten, R.A., Wahlberg, M.W. and Clayton, D.A. (1980) Cell 22, 157-170.
51. Kobayashi, M., Seki, T., Katsuyuki, Y. and Koike, K. (1981) Gene 16, 297-307.
52. K5chel, H.G. and Kfntzel, H. (1982) Nucl.Acids Res. 10, 4795-4801.
53. HsuChen, C.C., Kotin, R.M., Dubin, D.T. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12, 7771-7785.
4190

More Related Content

What's hot

Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.
Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.
Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.Dr. UJWALKUMAR TRIVEDI, Ph. D., FICS
 
RNA Class:The Classification of RNA
RNA Class:The Classification of RNARNA Class:The Classification of RNA
RNA Class:The Classification of RNAcdgenomics525
 
Replication In Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes
Replication In Eukaryotes and ProkaryotesReplication In Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes
Replication In Eukaryotes and ProkaryotesM Nadeem Akram
 
Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...
Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein  synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein  synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...
Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...Nilima Patil
 
Dna replication part i
Dna replication part  iDna replication part  i
Dna replication part iICHHA PURAK
 
Cell division 2 DNA Replication
Cell division 2 DNA Replication Cell division 2 DNA Replication
Cell division 2 DNA Replication Robin Seamon
 
Molecular Biology Revision-Part1
Molecular Biology Revision-Part1Molecular Biology Revision-Part1
Molecular Biology Revision-Part1Namrata Chhabra
 
Relaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy number
Relaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy numberRelaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy number
Relaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy numbersalvia16
 
DNA replication in E.coli
DNA replication in E.coliDNA replication in E.coli
DNA replication in E.colikhushbushastri
 
Types of RNA
Types of RNATypes of RNA
Types of RNAsripathip
 
Plasmid replication -methods & types
Plasmid replication -methods & types Plasmid replication -methods & types
Plasmid replication -methods & types neeru02
 

What's hot (19)

RNA: Nature, type and Structure
RNA: Nature, type and StructureRNA: Nature, type and Structure
RNA: Nature, type and Structure
 
Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.
Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.
Prokaryotic DNA Replication: Historical Perspectives and Mechanisms.
 
RNA Class:The Classification of RNA
RNA Class:The Classification of RNARNA Class:The Classification of RNA
RNA Class:The Classification of RNA
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Replication In Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes
Replication In Eukaryotes and ProkaryotesReplication In Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes
Replication In Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes
 
Rna splicing
Rna splicingRna splicing
Rna splicing
 
Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...
Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein  synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein  synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...
Molecular basis of inheritance-Protein synthesis part 1 Transcriptionein ppt...
 
Dnareplication
DnareplicationDnareplication
Dnareplication
 
Dna replication part i
Dna replication part  iDna replication part  i
Dna replication part i
 
Cell division 2 DNA Replication
Cell division 2 DNA Replication Cell division 2 DNA Replication
Cell division 2 DNA Replication
 
Molecular Biology Revision-Part1
Molecular Biology Revision-Part1Molecular Biology Revision-Part1
Molecular Biology Revision-Part1
 
Replication of DNA
Replication of DNAReplication of DNA
Replication of DNA
 
Relaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy number
Relaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy numberRelaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy number
Relaxed plasmids & Regulation of copy number
 
RNA PROCESSING
RNA  PROCESSINGRNA  PROCESSING
RNA PROCESSING
 
DNA replication in E.coli
DNA replication in E.coliDNA replication in E.coli
DNA replication in E.coli
 
DNA REPLICATION
DNA REPLICATIONDNA REPLICATION
DNA REPLICATION
 
Types of RNA
Types of RNATypes of RNA
Types of RNA
 
Dna replication and repair
Dna replication and repairDna replication and repair
Dna replication and repair
 
Plasmid replication -methods & types
Plasmid replication -methods & types Plasmid replication -methods & types
Plasmid replication -methods & types
 

Viewers also liked

لجنة ثانية ع 1
لجنة ثانية ع 1لجنة ثانية ع 1
لجنة ثانية ع 1Ahmed Farouk
 
لجنة ثانية ع 7
لجنة ثانية ع   7لجنة ثانية ع   7
لجنة ثانية ع 7Ahmed Farouk
 
لجنة ثانية ع 5
لجنة ثانية ع   5لجنة ثانية ع   5
لجنة ثانية ع 5Ahmed Farouk
 
لجنة ثانية ع 6
لجنة ثانية ع   6لجنة ثانية ع   6
لجنة ثانية ع 6Ahmed Farouk
 
لجنة ثانية ع 2
لجنة ثانية ع 2لجنة ثانية ع 2
لجنة ثانية ع 2Ahmed Farouk
 
لجنة ثانية ع 4
لجنة ثانية ع   4لجنة ثانية ع   4
لجنة ثانية ع 4Ahmed Farouk
 
لجنة ثانية ع 3
لجنة ثانية ع  3لجنة ثانية ع  3
لجنة ثانية ع 3Ahmed Farouk
 
Kd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatik
Kd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatikKd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatik
Kd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatikMuhammad Luthfan
 
Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747
Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747
Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747Robin Gutell
 
Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)
Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)
Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)Muhammad Luthfan
 
Diapositivas finales
Diapositivas finalesDiapositivas finales
Diapositivas finalesalguersol
 
Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...
Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...
Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...ConversionConUA
 

Viewers also liked (20)

لجنة ثانية ع 1
لجنة ثانية ع 1لجنة ثانية ع 1
لجنة ثانية ع 1
 
MH-NUP
MH-NUPMH-NUP
MH-NUP
 
لجنة ثانية ع 7
لجنة ثانية ع   7لجنة ثانية ع   7
لجنة ثانية ع 7
 
لجنة ثانية ع 5
لجنة ثانية ع   5لجنة ثانية ع   5
لجنة ثانية ع 5
 
A COSTA DA MORTE
A COSTA DA MORTEA COSTA DA MORTE
A COSTA DA MORTE
 
Blank
BlankBlank
Blank
 
لجنة ثانية ع 6
لجنة ثانية ع   6لجنة ثانية ع   6
لجنة ثانية ع 6
 
JMMorales_IDelCampo
JMMorales_IDelCampoJMMorales_IDelCampo
JMMorales_IDelCampo
 
لجنة ثانية ع 2
لجنة ثانية ع 2لجنة ثانية ع 2
لجنة ثانية ع 2
 
لجنة ثانية ع 4
لجنة ثانية ع   4لجنة ثانية ع   4
لجنة ثانية ع 4
 
Trabajo de brenda
Trabajo de brendaTrabajo de brenda
Trabajo de brenda
 
لجنة ثانية ع 3
لجنة ثانية ع  3لجنة ثانية ع  3
لجنة ثانية ع 3
 
Kd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatik
Kd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatikKd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatik
Kd ii meeting 6 (tep thp)-rev (senyawa aromatik
 
Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747
Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747
Gutell 013.jbiosci.1985.08.0747
 
Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)
Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)
Kd ii meeting 5 (tep thp)-rev (1) (Asam karboksilat)
 
Diapositivas finales
Diapositivas finalesDiapositivas finales
Diapositivas finales
 
Can piel
Can pielCan piel
Can piel
 
SelectUSA presentations - Mexico 2013
SelectUSA presentations - Mexico 2013SelectUSA presentations - Mexico 2013
SelectUSA presentations - Mexico 2013
 
Gift wrapping
Gift wrappingGift wrapping
Gift wrapping
 
Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...
Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...
Як самому створити сайт лендінг з 44% конверсією за 51 хвилину (Сергій Гутюк,...
 

Similar to Gutell 011.nar.1985.13.04171

Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173
Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173
Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173Robin Gutell
 
Jose Chang McNair abstract
Jose Chang McNair abstractJose Chang McNair abstract
Jose Chang McNair abstractJose R. Chang
 
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223
Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223
Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223Robin Gutell
 
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence AnalysisAbdulrahman Muhammad
 
Dna structure &amp; replication
Dna  structure &amp; replicationDna  structure &amp; replication
Dna structure &amp; replicationshiv chaudhary
 
Triplex dna 1
Triplex dna 1Triplex dna 1
Triplex dna 1CHAL91
 
Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)
Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)
Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)SourabhKumar240
 
Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075
Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075
Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075Robin Gutell
 
Lecture notes on dna and rna for submission
Lecture notes on dna and rna for submissionLecture notes on dna and rna for submission
Lecture notes on dna and rna for submissionoweh oghenetega
 
Structure of RNA.pptx
Structure of RNA.pptxStructure of RNA.pptx
Structure of RNA.pptxsalman91742
 
Ribonucleic acid
Ribonucleic acidRibonucleic acid
Ribonucleic acidICHHA PURAK
 
A1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdf
A1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdfA1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdf
A1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdfRahulSharma123800
 
BTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptx
BTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptxBTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptx
BTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptxChijiokeNsofor
 
06. structure of dna and rna
06. structure of dna and rna 06. structure of dna and rna
06. structure of dna and rna saveena solanki
 
Structure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rnaStructure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rnaRachana Eshwaran
 
Lecture 2 final sols 2019
Lecture 2 final sols 2019Lecture 2 final sols 2019
Lecture 2 final sols 2019SourabhKumar240
 

Similar to Gutell 011.nar.1985.13.04171 (20)

Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173
Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173
Gutell 010.jbc.1984.259.05173
 
Jose Chang McNair abstract
Jose Chang McNair abstractJose Chang McNair abstract
Jose Chang McNair abstract
 
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
 
Ribosomes.pptx
Ribosomes.pptxRibosomes.pptx
Ribosomes.pptx
 
Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223
Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223
Gutell 027.faseb.j.1993.07.0223
 
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis
 
Dna structure &amp; replication
Dna  structure &amp; replicationDna  structure &amp; replication
Dna structure &amp; replication
 
Triplex dna 1
Triplex dna 1Triplex dna 1
Triplex dna 1
 
Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)
Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)
Lecture2 nucleic acid (1)
 
Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075
Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075
Gutell 022.mbp.1992.52.0075
 
Lecture notes on dna and rna for submission
Lecture notes on dna and rna for submissionLecture notes on dna and rna for submission
Lecture notes on dna and rna for submission
 
Structure of RNA.pptx
Structure of RNA.pptxStructure of RNA.pptx
Structure of RNA.pptx
 
Ribonucleic acid
Ribonucleic acidRibonucleic acid
Ribonucleic acid
 
Transcriptome analysis
Transcriptome analysisTranscriptome analysis
Transcriptome analysis
 
A1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdf
A1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdfA1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdf
A1855802565_23691_27_2019_RNA and its types.pdf
 
BTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptx
BTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptxBTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptx
BTC 810 Analysis of Transcriptomes.pptx
 
06. structure of dna and rna
06. structure of dna and rna 06. structure of dna and rna
06. structure of dna and rna
 
Structure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rnaStructure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rna
 
Rna polymerase
Rna polymeraseRna polymerase
Rna polymerase
 
Lecture 2 final sols 2019
Lecture 2 final sols 2019Lecture 2 final sols 2019
Lecture 2 final sols 2019
 

More from Robin Gutell

Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiGutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataGutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigGutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Robin Gutell
 

More from Robin Gutell (20)

Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiGutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
 
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
 
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
 
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
 
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataGutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
 
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
 
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigGutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
 
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
 
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
 
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
 
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
 
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
 
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
 
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
 
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
 
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
 
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
 
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
 
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
 
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
 

Recently uploaded

Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning eraArtificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning eraDeakin University
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonetsnaman860154
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slidespraypatel2
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machinePadma Pradeep
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphSIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphNeo4j
 
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxMaximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxOnBoard
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAzure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAndikSusilo4
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesSinan KOZAK
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2
Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2
Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2Hyundai Motor Group
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksSoftradix Technologies
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):comworks
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountPuma Security, LLC
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?XfilesPro
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning eraArtificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
Artificial intelligence in the post-deep learning era
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphSIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
 
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxMaximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAzure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2
Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2
Next-generation AAM aircraft unveiled by Supernal, S-A2
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
 
The transition to renewables in India.pdf
The transition to renewables in India.pdfThe transition to renewables in India.pdf
The transition to renewables in India.pdf
 

Gutell 011.nar.1985.13.04171

  • 1. Volume 13 Number 11 1985 Nucleic Acids Research Further characterization of the extremely small mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs from trypanosomes: a detailed comparison of the 9S and 12S RNAs from Crithidia fasciculata and Trypanosoma brucei with rRNAs from other organisms Paul Sloof, Janny Van den Burg, Arthur Voogd, Rob Benne, Manuela Agostinelli', Piet Borst2, Robin Gutell3 and Harry Noller3 Section for Molecular Biology, Laboratory of Biochemistry, University of Amsterdam, AMC Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and 3Thimann Laboratories, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA Received 12 March 1985; Revised and Accepted 7 May 1985 ABSTRACT We have determined the nucleotide sequence of a maxi-circle segment from the insect trypanosome Crithidia fasciculata mitochondrial DNA, on which the genes for the major maxicircle transcripts of 9S and 12S are localized. The 5'-terminal sequences of these RNAs were determined by wandering spot analysis. The map coordinates of the 9S and 12S RNAs from Trypanosoma brucei were adjusted with respect to a previous report with the aid of primer extension analysis with reverse transcriptase. This approach allowed us to align the corresponding genes from both organisms which show an overall sequence homology of 77%. The 9S and 12S RNA genes from the two trypanosome species contain sequences, closely related to some of the regions that are universally conserved among ribosomal RNAs from members of the three primary kingdoms and their organelles, even though the overall level of sequence homology is extremely low. These universal sequences occur at positions in the 9S and 12S RNAs that are analogous to those occupied by their counterparts in authentic ribosomal RNAs. The characteristic secondary structure elements flanking these universal sequences in genuine ribosomal RNAs can also be formed in the trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNAs. These results provide unequivocal evidence for a ribosomal function of the 9S and 12S RNAs of trypanosomal mitochon- dria, notwithstanding their extremely small size (estimated to be 612 and 1141 nucleotides in C. fasciculata, 611 and 1150 nucleotides in T. brucei) and their unusual base composition (83% A+U). INTRODUCTION The biologically significant coding capacity of kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), the extraordinary mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of haemoflagellate protozoa (1-3), resides in the maxi-circle component (4-10). The nucleotide sequence has been determined of a major part of the Trypano- soma brucel maxi-circle. This part contains a set of genes for typical mtDNA-encoded proteins, c.f. apocytochrome b (lla,llb), the cytochrome c oxidase subunits I and II (12), unassigned reading frames (11,12), and the genes for the major maxi-circle transcripts: the 9S and 12S RNAs (13). These high abundance RNAs occur in equimolar amounts and are not specifically retained on oligo(dT) cellulose (4), properties which are ©) I RL Press Limited, Oxford, England. 4171
  • 2. Nucleic Acids Research shared with mitochondrial ribosomal (r)RNAs from other organisms. A ribosomal function for the trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNAs has therefore been suggested (2,4,14). However, direct evidence for this proposal is still lacking because all attempts to isolate a 9S and 12S PNA containing ribosomal fraction from trypanosomal mitochondria have sofar been un- successful (4,15). A powerful approach to investigate a possible ribosomal function for the trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNAs is to exploit the extremely high struct- ural conservation of ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) throughout evolution (16,17). In a previous report from this laboratory (13) this approach was followed for the 9S and 12S RNAs of T. brucei leading to the proposal that these RNAs are the trypanosomal equivalents of mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs (mtrRNAs). However, this conclusion was only tentative due to the low degree of sequence homology between 9S and 12S and other rRNAs, which made it impossible to determine the precise 5'- and 3'-end points of the 9S and 12S RNA genes. We have therefore directly determined the 5'- terminal sequences of the 9S and 12S RNAs from T. brucei and extended the analysis- to the insect trypanosome C. fasciculata, from which we have also cloned and sequenced the 9S and 12S RNA genes. By sequence compar- ison we have investigated whether putative rRNA-like sequences in 9S and 12S RNAs are conserved among trvpanosomes, and whether possible secondarv structures can be proven by phylogenetic criteria (18). In this report we show that a limited number of regions in the trypanosome 9S and 12S RNAs is homologous to sequences which are highlv conserved among the members of the three primarv kingdows and their organelles (18). Moreover, characteristic secondary structures flanking these conserved sequences can also be formed in trypanosome 9S and 12S RNAs. From these structural analogies we conclude that the trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNAs are indeed ribosomal RNAs. Trypanosomes branched from the phylogenetic tree of eukaryotic organisms at an early stage (19). Since then, trypanosomal mtDNA has apparently been exposed to different evolutionary pressures compared with mtDNAs from other eukaryotes and this is emphasized both by its unique organisation into kDNA and by a low degree of sequence homology with other mtDNAs (1-3, 11-13). The conserved sequences and their structures in trypanosomal mtrRNAs may therefore represent basic features of rRNA, which are the minimal requirements for ribosomal function. 4172
  • 3. Nucleic Acids Research MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials - Restriction endonucleases were from New England Biolabs or Boehringer Mannheim; DNA polymerase (large fragment), calf intestine phosphatase and T4 DNA ligase from Boehringer; Avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase from Dr.J.Beard (Life Sciences Inc., St.Petersburg, Florida, USA); exonuclease Bal-31 from New England Biolabs or Bethesda Research Laboratories; Low-melting agarose from Bethesda Research Laboratories. DNA and RNA - Relevant data on the procedures for Crithidia fasciculata cultivation and kDNA isolation are described in ref.14 or refs therein. Total cellular RNA from Trypanosoma brucei strain 427 (culture form) and C. fasciculata were isolated with the LiCl precip- itation method (20). RNA was stored at -20°C as an ethanol precipitate. Plasmid and M13RF DNAs were isolated according to ref.21. Cloning in plasmid and bacteriophage M13 DNA C. fasciculata kDNA was cleaved with restiction endonuclease HindIII and the resulting fragments were ligated into plasmid pBR322. From the HindIII-C. fasciculata maxi-circle bank a clone containing the D5D1 fragment as insert (pD5D1) was selected by size, restriction enzyme fragmentation pattern and hybridization with T. brucei fragment RR3, which contains the 9S and 12S RNA genes (4) (see Fig.1). This recombinant plasmid was used as starting material for the sequence determination. p(D5D1) was cut with SalI and PstI and the resulting fragments were separated by electrophoresis on a low melting agarose gel. The 3 kb fragment S2-PS1 (see Fig.1) was isolated from the gel according to ref.22. M13 clones containing a varying part of the fragment S2-PS1 were generated with Bal3l exonuclease using non-random cloning procedures according to ref.23, except that gel isolation of Bal31 treated fragments was omitted (see ref.12). The ligation reactions were performed with vectors treated with calf-intestine phosphatase according to ref.12. This approach yielded 55 M13 clones containing a series of overlapping inserts from both strands. These clones were subjected to DNA sequence analysis. DNA sequence analysis DNA sequence determination was carried out by the dideoxynucleotide chain-termination technique (24). In this way a number of overlapping sequences were obtained from both strands, encompassing the 9S and 12S Di Figure 1: Physical map of the C. fasciculata maxi- Ps1 circle The 9S and 12S RNAs were previously mapped on the EcoRI-HaeIII fragment R6-E2 (15). The HindIII fragment D5 DI was cloned in E. coli with pBR322 as s<--::'-: 4 6 E2 * < vector. From this clone the SalI-PstI fragment S2-Psl 32/3032 R2 I was subcloned in bacterio- / tX 46 R3 phage M13. Relevant so "<"2°-Fsrestriction sites are 2470 30 indicated: HindIII = D; /Vao7rzEcoRI = R; SalI = S; HaeIII RK D., ~~~E. 4173
  • 4. Nucleic Acids Research RNA genes. In regions where the sequence was ambiguous, reliable sequences were obtained by priming with specifically constructed syn- thetic oligonucleotides as primers for DNA synthesis (see ref.25). 5'-termini of 9S and 12S RNAs of C. fasciculata 9S and 12S RNA were separated by gelelectrophoresis and extracted from the gel. RNA was labelled with ( 32P)-ATP using phage T4 polynucleo- tide kinase according to ref.26. End-labelled RNA was partially degraded by nuclease P1 and the oligonucleotides were subjected to electrophoresis on cellulose acetate followed by homochromatography on DEAE thin layer plates in the second dimension (27). 5'-termini of 9S and 12S RNAs of T. brucei Primed cDNA synthesis using synthetic oligonucleotide as primers was carried out in the presence of dideoxy NTPs as chain terminators, essent- ially as described (28). The primers were located at a distance of 75-100 nucleotides from the putative 5'-end of the RNAs as determined in Si nuclease protection experiments (29). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION I The nucleotide sequences of the C. fasciculata 9S and 12S RNA genes and their alignment with the T. brucei genes The nucleotide sequence of a C. fasciculata maxi-circle segment containing 12S and 9S RNA genes, is presented in Fig.2. The 5'-ends of the corresponding RNAs were directly determined by wandering spot analysis (Fig.3). The 5'-UUUAUCA sequence for 12S RNA and the 5'-UUUUUAU sequence for 9S RNA occur only once each in the sequenced maxi-circle segment. The 5'-ends of the genes in T. brucei were determined by primer extension analysis with reverse transcriptase (see Fig.4). The 3'-ends of the 12S and 9S RNA genes of T. brucei were previously determined by S1 protection experiments at positions 1183 and 1807 respectively (29). The sequence homology in the vicinity of these positions in T. brucei and C. fasciculata maxi-circle segments drops from 100% to a background value (Fig.2). From this sequence comparison we deduced the 3'-ends of the 12S RNA genes at position 1174 in C. fasciculata and at 1181 in T. brucei, and of the 9S RNA genes at position 1834 and 1810 in C. fasciculata and T. brucei respectively. This leads to a length of the gene for the C. fasciculata 12S RNA of 1141 nucleotides (1150 nucleotides in T. brucei) and for the 9S RNA of 612 nucleotides (611 nucleotides in T. brucei), and an intergenic region of 48 nucleotides (29 nucleotides in T. brucei). A comparison of the aligned 9S and 12S RNA gene sequences of T. brucei and C. fasciculata shows occasional small insertions and deletions (of 5 bp or less). Sequence divergence of 22% and 24% for the 9S and 12S RNA genes respectively is limited mostly to individual base replacements, which are non-randomly distributed along the genes. In the 9S RNA genes 4174
  • 5. Nucleic Acids Research T.bruce, -RNA-genes v.s. C. fasctculata rRNA-genes. gCAr5' 12 at rRNA I.br. 1';&lGTAATCCAA ATTTACCAA ITAAGAA0AA TATtATAATA ATCCCCTCl TATAITTAT- AAlAAATATT TAAA1TCC0I CTACTAAAT1 lAITATTlC 22 TFTIAA1I;A TOAJUA(AI ITAIlTAAA ---AAAlAAIA A-GGTCOCTA lAIAIT0lAA AA6T6TIAA1 ITAAAlTT1G ATIAl(:TTIl lA11I- AA1 S' 128 at rRNA C.fasc. 121 AI1AlTTIAA TAAlAC:GlCl --AITATATT TAAATITTAA ATlTCTTCTI TTlAlAr AG. AIACAAlI1T AIA0ATTAAI -A7ATTTAAA TAAIATTI1A 11/ ThAI ITAlA (A1AITAATT AIAATA1ATT TAAA1AIIAA Al 111 GII TIAIAITTAO TTTAAAAl1l AA1A1ATAAl IAIAAACAAI IlI(AlII AA 218 AAATTTAITG AACTGrAATT ATTAGTTTAA TATTTTTAGT TTGATGTTGA AATATTTAAT TAAACArtGT ACAOTTCTTC TATATGTACC AAATAAArAT 217 AGTTTTAATG AACTOTTATT TATACTTGAT ATTTTTTAOT TTAATGTTTA AATATTTATC TAATAATGTT ACAGTTGTTC TATATGTACC AATAAGAAAr 310 AGlAAGATFA TTTTAGIIA A1TAATAAA7 AAATATT- -T ATTTTTCTIT GTAAATATTA TGAACAATIT AAAAATlAAI CTGlTTAA(T AAAAIQlTAT 3117 AGTAAAATTA TrTTAAITAA TTtAATAAAT ACTIATTGA ATAlIATATI ACAAAIATTA TGAAGTTITT AAAAATtAAA TITTTAAlCi ATTATAAIAI 416 ATATA-AT^A TCTAAGTTAA TTTGAATATT AAAACTACAA GTATAATTTG TAATTCTAAA GTATTTTAAT GGTAtATTTT TAOTAGGTAA ATCAAAAGTA 417 AATTTGCTTA TTAATTTAA ATTGAATATT AAAACTACAA TGCTAAGTTO TGATTTT--T OTTTYTTA--- -GTATATTTT TAGATATTTA ATAAAAACAA .11' TAAAlGCATA 1AACIIAATA TTTAATATTT GTTTAAT6AA AACGATTTTA TTATfAATAf GIAlAGIATT A7TATAGTCT ATAGITIITI AAAAATATAA 511 -----CTTA AATTTTAATA 7TTAATATfT G IAAAAAAA AAGTOACGAA tTCTAGTAAA AAAAAlTATT TTTAIA---A AlTTATTTIT AAAAAIACAI 615 AAATATTGTT AATAAAATTA TCGTATTTTA AGTGCGTTTA TTAAATGCGT TTGTCTAAGA TAATTATTTA AGATTAFTCT TGTAAATATA TTTAAATATT 603 ATATATTOIT AATAAAATTA TTAAGTTTCA AAAGCGTTTA TTAAATGCGC TTGTCTAACr trtTTATTTA AGATAATTCT TOTATATAGT TITATATTIT 71' AATAATTCTl --AAAAlAAA AAAATAICCT CAATTGCAAl ATTATIGIAG CATACTAAl1 TGITAACTAA ATATTAAAGT TICCATAGA AAAlTtTTAA 70:4 AATAATICTA TTTAATTAAA T7ATACICCT CATAAAATAT CTATAAOTAG CATAGTAAIT TGTTAACTAA TTATTAAAAT GTTCCACAGA AAA1ITTAAA 9 S 813 ATTACAACAA ArAAAATAAA GTATGAATTA ATATCAAAAT TTTAATA ATTAAAAAAT T A CAAGTCC T CCTTTAC AOAACA 803 ATTATAACAA TCAAAGTAAA TAATAAATTA AAATAAAAAT TTTAAAAAAA ATTAAA AT T AG CAOTCC TC CCTTTAC AAAGACAACA 913 T-TAIGATA7 GTAAlTQTAl GTIIGATTG GT CCO TACTA TATTTATTTA TATAGCAIAA GAACtATAIA CTTTGAAATI ATAAAAGr COAC 0011 't0:.4 TA1rTAATAT CTAAlTClAl 7TTGAlITG CC TACCTA TATCTTATTA TATAGAAAAA CAACTATACT TATTGAAAT AT COAC if 1012 AC AIT AAAATAAAT GTQTTTCATC GTCTACTTAT CAT--GA VT TOTTC ATCAAAATAG TAATTCTIG GTTGGOTTAA AATCOTTGTA 1003 AACA ATT AATACTAAAT GrTGTTCATC OTCTACTTAT TAAAAAA TT* TTGTTC ATCAAAAATG CAAT CGT GTTGoGTTA AATCGTTGA 3' 125 at rRNA T.br._5 110O AAGCAGATITrC11 ArAT ITAATTITTA TAArT^A-TA ATAATTAATA T rAC# C AAGGAITGATT ATTGAAAAAA --A-.A 1103 AAGCAOATTT GlTrArATAT TTAATTAGTT AATrTAATTA AGTTTrAATA GTJ OTACCCA GAQlTTAl)rrArtQTIr1r rCAAATCTAA ATTCACAFTA 3' 128 at rRNA C. fasc. _5 99 at rRNA T. b.. 119.' AOAAGAAIAI AA1ITA1ATA AATIAlGCGC AA1TGTTAG7 ATTCATATTA ATTTTTTAA ATGlTITAIC ATT1TATAAA GCTTTA1TtT TGAAACA1fr ;T:4 AATA(ACTAAC AA^AAlAATA TrirTAlG1C AATTCTTATT AITCATATTA AITTTTTTTA AAG1ITTtAA TTITTAlAlI AG1IIA1T-G ACAAACTII to-; 93 at rRNA C. Fasc. 1;'9. 1110GTA1AAA AT1IIAG0AA 1AGTTAA1AA TAATTTATAA TTTTGATTAG A1TGTTI01I TAA1GCTA1T AGAl-GrU:IG l0GAAAAAIA AAAAAAA1AA 1:I0.1 1I-AAATCTA 11TTAGGAA TAG1TAAIAA TA1TTTATAA 7ICIGAllAG ATTACA1TG1 TACIOCIATA TAAAGGG(;1G T0GAAAlIC1 ACICAAA1A7 1391 TTAATATATA TCAATAATAA ATTAAA1TAA TCTAT---TA GTCACAAATG TOCCACC QTTGCITTAA ITTCTATGCr TtrAAATAFT ATACAATTAT * * & * **-***** **** *-** * * * *§****1*-*-********** 44 *-*-**** **** ***** -**** 1401 AATAAAT^At TATATAAtAA ATTACATTAr TTACrAACCA GTCAOAAATG GTGCCACCC 0TT0CCCTAA 1TCTATQCT IITAAAtATT AtACATTTAT 1411 (.CA1AlIAAAl IGlIAAG1OC 10- -AIIAA CCAA1AAAAA 1A1AAA1AAI TVTTA1TIGT lITTAAACAC CAIrAG0lAl A7GCAAA1AI rAAAIAIAAG 1101 lIAAATTlTICAC TAA AIAliTTIAGCCAA1TAAAA CAIAlGITIT CGlTAITT1T TIITAAACA(. CCAlIOClAl A1CCAAATI AAAMIGACA1r 1386 TAAl TATAAA r AATT TATA TTATATTTAT TCATATAATT AATAGGATAA TAITTGTACT TTTFGAoACC ATGATOAACA TTATAAATrG AAACrcITAA******** ****-*-* *0 ** *0 **** *-** *00 -t* -**000 -*** *** * -*** 0* 16.01 TAATTATT ^TTATATTAIT TTATATITAT TCAAATTGTT A _AAATAAA AATTTATOTA ATTTGACACC ATGAAAACGA CTATCAAT-G ATAITGTAAA 11411. IACAAlAlAC AAAAlITATT AITTAlAIIA AAlAlCTAlG lAGIAAA AAACTA GAATf TA lC(((AC CltA1IITAl AAIAAAA * **&**-** * * *----- - ** - - * **---*-- - * - *** ***** *****^*-*-***e* ******g o 1/50 lITtAlAAIC AAAAlIAACl TAlT^TAl(A AA^AAGCAA1 AIAGATAAA AAGACA1T C ClIIIIAl AA1AAAAA1I C 3' 93 *at rRNA T.br.-O I /1t1. ACCCClA I+lAlAl IAAAAAA AATFTTAC IAAATTACAA A(./Al71AA7 AAlIIAA(.-11111CA-I.A.Il 1. 11400 AltCC^GTl lCAAC lIVA AAAA ^CAIIAAA7A CAAAACACCT CTCACAlIKAC GICIC1CAI A1T(AAA(( C.fac &&.1at.1 3' 95 et rRNA C. fsc.aaJ 4175 Figure 2: Aligned maxi-circle DNA segments, containing the 12S and 9S RNA genes from T. brucei and C. fasciculata. The sequence of the T. brucei maxi-circle DNA segment containing the 9S and 12S genes (top line) is algined with the corresponding maxi-circle DNA Segment from C. fasciculata (bottom line). Identified universal sequences are boxed and indicated as in Tables II and III.
  • 6. Nucleic Acids Research 4p: {a ': i *-u~~~~~ qwu _MA *U ,,.Li. C .*.A ij 44 Figure 3: 5'-end determination of C. fasciculata 12S and 9S RNAs. C. fasciculata 12S and 9S RNAs were purified electrophoretically and subjected to wandering spot analysis as described in Methods. (a) Auto- radiogram of 12S RNA. (b) Autoradiogram of 9S RNA. mutations are considerably less frequent in the regions 1427-1482 and 1747-1801 (T. brucei coordinates), whereas in the 12S RNA gene the 3'-terminal region is well conserved (T. brucei coordinates 759-1180). These highly homologous regions harbour sequences and potential secondary structures that are recognizable analogues of conserved secondary structural elements of rRNA as described in refs. 16 and 17 (see below). Analysis of sequence divergence in protein-coding genes, tRNA- and rRNA-genes of human and bovine mtDNA, has shown that transitions appear more frequently than transversions (30). This tendency has also been observed in a comparison of the mitochondrial rRNA genes of two Para- mecium subspecies (31,32). In trypanosome 9S and 12S RNA genes trans- versions are more prominent (15% and 16% of the bases for the 9S and 12S RNA genes respectively) than transitions (5% of the bases for both genes) (see Table I). This may be a reflection of the extreme bias towards A+T in mtDNA of trypanosomes (83% in both 9S and 12S RNA genes). The percentage sequence difference between the 9S and 12S RNA genes of the two trypanosome species (about 23%, see Table I) is as large as between the mtrRNA genes of Human and Cow (30). Assuming an equal rate of sequence evolution in mtrRNA genes of mammals and of trypanosomes we 4176
  • 7. Nucleic Acids Research A A~ Ac A Tv : Tc asbr w C fi A t C 0 .. _ x A A A A T a Al A T T C T T G A T C 0 12S Figure 4: 5'-end determination of 9S and 12S rRNA from T. brucei. cDNA synthesis using a synthetic dodecadeoxyribonucleotide primer, carried out as described in Methods. Primers were: 12S RNA- 5'-TTTACTACACGG-3' (complementary to 97-108, see Fig.2). 9S RNA- 5'-ATTAACTATTCC-3' (complementary to 1308-1319, see Fig.2). as speculate that the divergence time for C. fasciculata and T. brucei is the same as for Human and Cow, namely 80x10 years (33). II Structural relationship between trypanosome 9S RNA and small subunit ribosomal RNA In order to determine structural relationships between the TABLE I MICRO EVOLUTION OF TRYPANOSOME 9S AND 12S RNAs Gene Type of mutation 9S RNA 12S RNA Transition 36 ( 5.8) 66 ( 5.7) Transversion 91 (14.8) 180 (15.8) Deletion/Insertion 9 ( 1.6) 32 ( 2.8) Mutations total 136 (22.2) 278 (24.3) The T. brucei and C. fasciculata mitochondrial 9S and 12S RNA genes were aligned (see Fig.2) and the observed differences tabulated according to the type of mutation. Numbers in parentheses represent the percentage of bp's of the given gene with the respective mutation. 4177 O*_ a 9S 6 A T C G A T c 0
  • 8. Nucleic Acids Research TABLE II CONSERVED SEQUENCES IN TRYPANOSOME 9S RNA Position Sequence Small subunit rRNA (a) 515 - GUGCCAGCAGCCGCGGUAAU E.coli (16) GUGCCAGCARYCGCGGUA-AY ConsensusC C 1439 AUGCCAGCCGUUGCGGUAAU T.brucei (13); 1452 C.fasciculata * * Transitions (b) 1391 - UGUACACAC8GCCCGUC E.coli (16) YGYAC AAYYRCYCRUC Consensus 1750) AGGUAUUGUUGCCCACC T.brucei (13); 1764 C.fasciculata * *** Transversions * * Transitions (c) 1492 - AAGUCGUAACAAGGU E.coli (16) AAGUYGMCAYAXRGU ConsensusUC 1785 AACGUGCAGUAAUUA T.brucei (13); 1799 C.fasciculata ** *** Transversions * * Transitions Conserved sequences from trypanosome 9S RNA are shown aligned with their homologues which are universal in the 16S-like rRNAs of the three major kingdoms (typified by E. coli). Consensus sequences take into consider- ation the corresponding regions from mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs from Paramecium (31); Yeast (46); Aspergillus (47); Maize (48); Human (49); Cow (30); Mouse (50); Rat (51) and Mosquito (only in (b) and (c); ref.37) R = purine; Y = pyrimidine; X = purine or pyrimidine; * indicates positions at which a transition or transversion occurred in trypanosome 9S RNA with respect to the consensus sequence; o indicates the position at which a P-site tRNA has been cross-linked to E. coli 16S rRNA (35). trypanosomal 9S and 12S RNA and rRNAs three approaches have been followed: (i) A search in trypanosome 9S and 12S RNAs for universal sequences found in all rRNAs (see ref.18); (ii) a search for conserved purine- pyrimidine sequences; and (iii) a search for secondary structure elements conserved in all rRNAs. It has been shown for T. brucei that the level of sequence homology 4178
  • 9. Nucleic Acids Research e- > - U .. AJ-F Fl,4L %) GAFtu uA GC: d G Li9 J pl-H R u U S - -i22 A U UiAi A G U u A U - AXu - u 6 R AU-fg A-U U ~ICIIij.;uiA R 9 q aAALU G 1A U f O U U IZIA A G- 'U U A b U IcR c 23 A ~~~~AUG RC"U AU AAUACU U-U A Figure 5: Conserved secondary structure features in trypanosome 9S RNA. The sequences of relevant C. fasciculata 9S RNA regions are given. Conserved sequences a,b and c, specified in Table II, are boxed. Constant nucleotides are shaded. Differences with the corresponding T. brucei 9S RNA regions are indicated by encircled nucleotides for base replacements. A diagram of E. coli 16S rRNA is given for reference. between the trypanosome 9S RNA and small subunit rRNA from either E. coli or mitochondria from a variety of organisms is low (13). However, one region (C. fasciculata 1452-1471) shows considerable homology to a highly conserved region of rRNA (E. coli 515-534) (16). In order to take the degree of variability in this universal sequence into account, we have derived a consensus sequence using the 515-534 region of E. coli 16S rRNA and corresponding regions in mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs from a number of organisms. A comparison of the corresponding trypanosome 9S RNA region with the consensus sequence shows only two transition mutations (see Table II, panel a). Since the secondary structure of this region and flanking sequences (E. coli positions 500-545) is also highly conserved in the 16S-like rRNA from all organisms and organelles (16,34), we have investigated trypano- some 9S RNA in this respect. Fig.5 shows that such a secondary structure is possible. By analogy with the model for E. coli 16S rRNA (16,34), the conserved primary sequence (E. coli 515-534 / C. fasciculata 1452-1471) 4179
  • 10. Nucleic Acids Research is contained in the apex loop of a hairpin structure. The helical stem is interrupted on the 5'-side by a 6 nucleotide bulge loop (5 nucleotides in trypanosomes) containing two adjacent A residues at characteristic positions for rRNA (E. coli AA510) (16). The upper part of the helical stem consists of 7 base paired residues (6 in T. brucei) as in all 16S-like rRNAs (16), and the lower part is formed by 3 bp's (5 bp's in E. coli). In close proximity to the 3'-side of this conserved structural element, another conserved structural feature is found: E. coli 27-37 / 547-556. This helical stem is generally irregular and of variable sequence. In trypanosomes a similar irregular helical stem can be formed (C. fasciculata 1485-1494 / 1241-1251) (Fig.5). In this stem, one base replacement (C. fasciculata U1473 - T. brucei is observed. Because of the abnormally high A/U bias observed in trypanosome 9S/12S RNAs, we carried out a search for sequence homology with rRNA sequences after generalizing G, A, C and U to either purines or pyrimi- dines. This was based on the premise that transitions occurring at a high frequency could obscure any search for absolute sequence homology. This approach led to the identification of two regions of high homology proximal to the 3'terminal part of trypanosome 9S RNA (see Table II-b and c). The first region corresponds to positions 1391-1407 of E. coli 16S rRNA and shows 4 transversions and two transitions with respect to the latter (see Table II-b). This E. coli 16S rRNA region is located at the subunit interface (18). Furthermore, the anticodon of a P site-bound tRNA has been cross-linked to C1400, indicating that codon-anticodon recog- nition occurs in close proximity to this position (35). A C-U transition is found at this position in trypanosome 9S RNA (see Table II), as in the mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs of two Paramecium subspecies (31). Transversions occur at the 5'-flank of this pyrimidine, while in the 3'-flanking sequence only the penultimate residue shows a transitional difference (Table II). This suggests that in E. coli the 16S rRNA sequence most crucial to the codon-anticodon recognition process includes positions located directly 3' to C1400. The second region shows strong homology to positions 1492-1503 of E. coli 16S rRNA, also located at the subunit interface (18). Trypanosome 9S RNA shows a greater divergence from the consensus here than for the other two universal sequences (Table Il-c). However, as is shown below, this entire 3'-terminal region of 9S RNA can be folded in a fashion closely 4180
  • 11. Nucleic Acids Research resembling the model proposed for the 3'-terminal region of E. coli 16S rRNA. Two universal sequences (E. coli 1391-1407 and 1492-1503) exist in a single stranded conformation in 16S rRNA (16) and are embedded in a characteristic set of helices (16,36). Upstream from E. coli position 1391 a long range interaction occurs (16) whereas between the two universal sequences a helical stem is found which varies in length between 7 bp (in Mosquito mitochondria, ref.37) and 49 bp (in the Rat cytoplasm, ref.38). A 3'-terminal helical stem is present in all small subunit rRNAs (16,36). This characteristic configuration can also be drawn for trypanosomal 9S RNA (Fig.5). A long-range interaction between 1762-1759 / 1714-1717 (C. fasciculata), containing one compensating base replacement relative to T. brucei at position 1716/1760, can be formed adjacent to the conserved sequence 1764-1780 (Table II). Between this conserved sequence and the conserved region 1799-1813 (C. fasciculata; Table II) a helical stem containing 7 basepairs can be drawn at precisely the predicted position. At the 3'-end of C. fasciculata 9S RNA a helical stem analogous to the 3'-terminal helix of 16S-like rRNAs can be formed which exhibits two compensating base changes relative to T. brucei 9S RNA (see Fig.5), proving their existence in vivo according to phylogenetic criteria (18). In Crithidia this helical region is interrupted, as also is observed in the mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs of two Paramecium subspecies (31). This interruption at A1817 / A1830 does not occur in T. brucei which has an A-U pair at this position. The position of the helical stem, its length (9 bp) and the number of residues in the loop (4 nucleotides) closely resemble the 3'-terminal helix found in all small subunit rRNAs (16). However, the conserved (A-U/U-G) part of the stem (39) at position: 1513-1522/1512-1523 of E. coli is not present in trypanosomes and from the conserved GGAA or UGAA sequences in the loop only the adjacent A residues are found in trypanosome 9S RNA. The adjacent A residues at this position are methylated in all rRNAs and are found unmethylated in kasugamycin resistant mutants (39). The nucleotide sequences in this conserved secondary structure element in small subunit rRNAs are related and have been used to construct a scheme of possible evolutionary links between bacteria, eukaryotic cytoplasms, mitochondria and chloroplasts (39). The nucleotide sequence of this element in trypa- nosome 9S RNA does not fit in this scheme of related sequences which provides evidence that trypanosomal 9S RNA has been exposed to a 4181
  • 12. Nucleic Acids Research (b) e i 769 Figure 6: The conserved secondary structure of the 769-810 (E.coli) region of the central domain of small subunit rRNA The number of nucleotides in single- or double-stranded conform- ation for this region in E. coli, and a consensus of the corresponding region for mitochondrial small subunit rRNA from Paramecium (32), Yeast (46), Aspergillus (47), Maize (48), Human 810 (49), Cow (30), Mouse (50), and Rat (51) is given in (a). A schematic drawing of this region is given in (b) and regions of T. brucei and C. fasci- culata 9S RNA, fulfilling the criteria formulated in the consensus are presented in (a). different evolutionary pressure than mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs of other organisms. From the identification of these three highly conserved small subunit rRNA sequences at analogous positions in trypanosome 9S RNA and from the potential of their flanking regions to form secondary structures closely analogous to that proposed for 16S-like rRNA (16) we conclude that 9S RNA is the trypanosome equivalent of mitochondrial small subunit rRNA. Therefore, we have searched for additional conserved secondary structure elements in trypanosome 9S RNA. A candidate is the 769-810 area (E. coli) which contains a constant secondary structure present in all rRNAs (see Fig.6). In a matrix plot of all possible base-pairing inter- actions within C. fasciculata 9S RNA, the only combination of single stranded and helical regions that fulfilled the criteria listed in Fig.6, is located between positions 1671-1705. In C. fasciculata the loop contains 8 residues (in T. brucei: 9 nucleotides) with the first stem being 3 bp, the second 6 bp in length, containing respectively one and 4182 (a) Small subunit rRNA Number of nucleotides in Base pairs in a b c d e E. coli 769-810 9 7 4 4 7 Consensus 9 6-8 3-5 3-4 6-8 T. brucei 9 6 3 3 6 C. fasciculata 1671-1705 8 6 3 3 6
  • 13. Nucleic Acids Research two compensating base replacements relative to T. brucei. The two helical regions are interrupted by an internal loop containing 6 nucleotides on the 5'-side and 3 nucleotides on the 3'-side, within the range of size variation observed for the consensus structure (Fig.6). The possibility of folding this region into a rRNA-like structure as well as its position relative to the other conserved rRNA sequences, suggest this region as a possible candidate for the characteristic 790 region of the central domain of small subunit rRNAs. In comparison with mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs from other organisms the trypanosome 9S RNAs are the smallest characterized thus far. The most drastic size reductions in 9S RNA relative to E. coli 16S rRNA have occurred in the (E. coli) areas: 38-500 (58%); 810-926 (94%) 933-1383 (91%) and 1409-1491 (80%). These regions are phylogenetically the most variable; in mammalian mitochondrial small subunit rRNAs the size reductions also occur within these regions (16). Among the conserved sequences found in small subunit rRNA, the three regions identified in trypanosome 9S RNA correspond to the most highly conserved ones (16). This implies that the other conserved sequences are deleted. However, a drastic change in their sequence or the possibility that they have never been present in trypanosomes cannot be excluded. III Structural relationship between trypanosome 12S RNA and large subunit rRNA Some highly conserved sequences, located in the functionally important 3'-terminal region of all large subunit rRNAs (17,34) (domains V and VI of E. coli 23S rRNA, ref.17) are also found in the 3'-terminal region of trypanosome 12S RNA. First, a 12-nucleotide sequence, which contains the ac-sarcin cleavage site, implicated in the binding of the EF-l.GTP.aa-tRNA ternary complex (40,41) is present at an analogous position in trypanosome 12S RNA, with only one transition base replacement with respect to the consensus (see Table III-a). This region can be folded in a secondary structure, exposing the putative ct-sarcin cleavage site in the apex loop, as has been determined for E. coli and Bacillus stearothermophilus (42) (see Fig.7). However, phylogenetic evidence for such folding in trypano- somes is lacking because of the high sequence homology between T. brucei and C. fasciculata in this area of 12S RNA. Second, in E. coli the site on 23S rRNA which is located at the peptidyl transferase center has been identified recently (43) in a 4183
  • 14. Nucleic Acids Research r.U C --9u _; U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C ..14G~~~~~~~~ in> uCV Un6 Figure 7: Secondary structure of the 3 -terminal region of trypanosome 12S RNA. The C. fasciculata sequence is given. Conserved sequences a,b,c,d,e, f and g, specified in Table III, are boxed. Constant nucleotides are shaded. Differences with the corresponding T. brucei 12S RNA region are indicated by encircled nucleotides for base replacements and by encircled X's for deletions. A diagram of the secondary structure of the corresponding region of 23S rRNA of E. coli (domains V and VI) is given for reference. conserved 11 nucleotide sequence. This sequence is also present in trypanosome 12S RNA at a unique and analogous location (see Table III-b). Further support for the involvement of this region of 12S RNA in peptidyl transferase activity comes from a comparison with two rRNA sequences associated with the sensitivity of protein synthesis towards chloram- phenicol (CAP), an antibiotic that inhibits peptidyl transferase activity 4184
  • 15. Nucleic Acids Research (44) (see Table III-c). Although these regions of trypanosome 12S RNA differ in sequence their homology with sequences in the peptidyl trans- ferase region is nevertheless clearly apparent. Since mutants in these sequences in yeast and mammalian mitochondria confer chloramphenicol resistance, trypanosome mitoribosomes might be expected to show CAP resistance. Indeed, protein synthesis in trypanosomes appears to be resistant to CAP (29). Also the region of 23S rRNA associated with erythromycin sensitivity (45), can be identified in trypanosome 12S RNA in a slightly altered form (see Table III-g). This observation is consistent with the absence of erythromycin-sensitive protein synthesis in trypanosomes (29). Finally, three other conserved sequences in the 3'- terminal region have been identified (see Table III-d,e,f). Using these sequences as landmarks in folding excercises on trypa- nosome 12S RNA we find that a secondary structure can be drawn which is similar to the 3'-terminal region of E. coli 23S rRNA (17) (see Fig.7). The putative CAP region, erythromycin region and the three other con- served regions (see Table III) can be positioned in analogous locations in the secondary structure model (Fig.7). Furthermore, a long-range RNA interaction (C. fasciculata 867-882/1130-1116) analogous to E. coli 2057-2043/2625-2611 is possible linking the putative Ct-sarcin region (Table III-a) and other conserved sequences (Tables III-b-g) as in the E. coli model (17). However, conclusive phylogenetic evidence for this folding in trypanosomes, is lacking because of the high sequence homology between T. brucei and C. fasciculata in this area on the one hand, and the extreme sequence divergence with respect to the large subunit rRNAs from other organisms and organelles on the other. From the presence of conserved large subunit rRNA-like sequences in the 3'-half of 12S RNA and from the possibility of folding this area in a closely homologous fashion to 23S rRNAs we conclude that 12S RNA is the trypanosomal equivalent of mitochondrial large subunit rRNA. The trypanosome 12S RNAs are the smallest mitochondrial large subunit rRNAs characterized thusfar. The 3'-terminal region of 12S RNA is only 315 nucleotides long, whereas the equivalent region in E. coli 238 rRNA, domains V and VI, spans 862 nucleotides. The size reduction of this region in trypanosome 12S RNA relative to E. coli 23S rRNA, is not evenly distributed. Some parts are constant while others are drastically reduced in size or are eliminated. The functionally important central part of this region, in which some sequences are identified that are involved in 4185
  • 16. Nucleic Acids Research TABLE III CONSERVED SEQUENCES IN TRYPANOSOME 12S RNA Position Sequence Large subunit rRNA a) 2655 - GUACGAGAGGAC E. coli (17) GUACGARAGGAG Consensus C C 1162) GUACGCAAGGAU T. brucei (13) 1156 C. fasciculata * Transition b) 2577 - AGCUGGG8flUA E. coli (17) AGGUCGGUUAC Consensus 1089 AGUUGGGWAA T. brucei (13); 1082 C. fasciculata c) 2698 2445 - GGGAUAACAG---ACCUCGAUGU E. coli (17) C RGGAUAACAG---ACCUCG UGU Consensus 1053 1007 - AGGUUAACAA---ACCAUGAUUG T. brucei (13) * * Transitions * * ** Transversions 1044 AA 998 - AGGUUAACAA---GCUA AUUG C. fasciculata * * * * Transitions * ** Transversions ** Insertions d) 2430 - AUAAAAGGU E. coli (17) UCAA G Consensus 992 AUAAAAGGU T. brucei (13); 989 C. fasciculata e) 2071 - ACCUUUAC E. coli (17) ACCA A Consensus 895> UCCUWAC T. brucei (13); 885 C. fasciculata * Transitions 4186
  • 17. Nucleic Acids Research TABLE III (continued) Position Sequence Large subunit rRNA f) 2242 - GUUUGACUGGGGCG E. coli (17) c UUY YGGGGYR Consensus 932 GUUWGAUWGGGGCA T. brucei (13); 923 C. fasciculata g) 2053 - GACGGAAAGACCC E. coli (17) RACGRRAAGACCC Consensus 878 UAGGGCAAGUCCU T. brucei (13); 868 C. fasciculata * Transitions * * * * Transversions Conserved sequences from trypanosome 12S RNA are shown aligned with their homologues which are universal in the 23S-like rRNAs from the three major kingdoms (typified by E. coli). Consensus sequences take into consider- ation the corresponding regions from mitochondrial large subunit rRNAs from Paramecium (31); Yeast (46); Aspergillus (52); Maize (48); Human (49); Cow (30); Mouse (50); Mosquito (53). R = purine; Y = pyrimidine; X = purine or pyrimidine; * indicates positions at which a transition, transversion or insertion occurs in the trypanosome 12S RNA with respect to the consensus sequence; o indicates the position where the aminoacyl end of P-site tRNA has been cross-linked to 23 S rRNA of E. coli (43). antibiotic resistance/sensitivity of protein synthesis and are in the vicinity of the ribosomal P-site, has about the same size in all organisms and organelles, including trypanosome mitochondria (indicated by the shaded area in the insert of Fig.7). Helices, protruding from this central part, are considerably reduced in size or are eliminated in all mitochondrial large subunit rRNAs. In trypanosome 12S RNA, however, the size reduction of these helices is most extreme. We have not found extensive structural homologies between the 5'-terminal region of large subunit rRNA and the analogous region of trypanosomal 12S RNA. This is due to the extreme sequence divergence between trypanosome 12S RNA with respect to other rRNAs. The functionally important UAGCUGG WU-811 (E. coli) region, which is conserved in all eubacterial, chloroplast, mitochondrial and eukarvotic cytoplasmic ribosomes is not recognizable in trypanosome 12S RNA. It has been proposed that the 3'-CCA of tRNA, which binds to the ribosome, interacts with the UGG in this conserved sequence (43). Absence of this RNA region in trypanosomal mitoribosomes would suggest that such a mode of tRNA 4187
  • 18. Nucleic Acids Research binding does not occur, at least not in this organelle or that tRNAs may not have CCA at their 3'-termini in trypanosome mitochondria. Since precise positioning of the 3'-ends of tRNA molecules on the ribosome is obviously crucial for the peptidyl transferase reaction, it is possible that in trypanosome mitoribosomes this is accomplished in some other way. CONCLUDING REMARKS From comparisons with primary and secondary structures of authentic rRNAs we conclude that the trypanosomal 9S and 12S mitochondrial RNAs are true ribosomal RNAs, albeit strange ones with respect to size, nucleotide sequence, base composition and gene organization. This is attributable in part to a different evolutionary pressure imposed on trypanosomal mtDNA, compared with mtDNA of other organisms. In addition, mitochondrial sequence evolution can be much faster than the evolution of nuclear sequences (33). Nevertheless, a few universal sequences and secondary structure elements have been highly conserved in trypanosome mitochon- drial rRNAs. These ancient sequences and structures must therefore be considered as fundamental to the translation process. Universal sequences that are absent in trypanosome 9S and 12S RNAs may represent elements that are either not necessary in trypanosome mitochondrial protein synthesis or for which the trypanosome mitoribosome has developed its own equivalents. The above mentioned unique features of trypanosome mitochon- drial rRNAs, the fact that chloramphenicol- or erythromycin-sensitive and cycloheximide-resistant protein synthesis have not been demonstrated in trypanosomes (29), and all attempts to purify ribosomes from trypanosome mitochondria by standard procedures have failed (4,15), lead us to expect that trypanosome mitoribosomes will prove to be most exceptional. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We appreciate the help of Dr.J.Bol and Mr.F.Brederode from the State University Leiden, The Netherlands and Ms.B.Klaver in 5'-end determ- ination of RNA. We thank Drs. L.A.Grivell and H.F.Tabak for critically reading of the manuscript, Drs.B.F.De Vries for assistance in the pre- paration of figures 5 and 7 and Ms.T.Scholts for expert typing. P.S. acknowledges EMBO for a short term fellowship. H.N. thanks K.Katze for discussions, and the U.S.National Institutes of Health (grant no. GM 17129) for support. *To whom correspondence should be addressed 'Present address: Instituto di Fisiologie, Universite degli Studi, P.Aldo Moro 5, 0100 Roma, Italy 2Present address: The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4188
  • 19. Nucleic Acids Research REFERENCES 1. Simpson, L. (1972) Intern.Rev.Cytol. 32, 139-207. 2. Borst, P. and Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. (1979) Plasmid 2, 20-40. 3. Englund, P.T. (1981) in: Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa (Levandovsky, M. and Hutner, S.H., Eds), 2nd edn. Vol.4, Academic Press, New York, pp.334-383. 4. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., Snijders, A., Janssen, J.W.G. and Borst, P. (1981) Plasmid 5, 329-350. 5. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. and Borst, P. (1978) Biochim.Biophys.Acta 521, 407-411. 6. Simpson, L. and Simpson, A.M. (1978) Cell 14, 169-178. 7. Simpson, A.M. and Simpson, L. (1980) Mol.Biochem.Parasitol. 2, 93-108. 8. *Stuart, K.D. and Gelvin, S.B. (1982) Mol.Cell.Biol. 2, 845-852. 9. Simpson, A.M., Simpson, L. and Livingston, L. (1982) Mol.Biochem. Parasitol. 6, 237-252. 10. Borst, P., Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., Hajduk, S.O. (1981) Parasitology 82, 81-93. lla. Benne, R., De Vries, B.F., Van den Burg, J. and Klaver, B. (1983) Nucl.Acids Res. 11, 6925-6941. llb. Johnson, B.J.B., Hill, G.C. and Donelson, J.E. (1984) Mol.Biochem. Parasitol. 13, 135-146. 12. Hensgens, L.A.M., Brakenhoff, J., De Vries, B.F., Sloof, P., Tromp, M.C., Van Boom, J.H. and Benne, R. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12, 7327-7344. 13. Eperon, I.C., Janssen, J.W.G., Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. and Borst, P. (1983) Nucl.Acids Res. 11, 105-125. 14. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., Schoutsen, B., Borst, P. (1982) Plasmid 7, 199-209. 15. Stuart, K. (1983) Mol.Biochem.Parasitol. 9, 93-104. 16. Woese, C.R., Gutell, R., Gupta, R. and Noller, H.F. (1983) Microbiol.Rev. 47, 621-669. 17. Noller, H.F., Kop, J., Wheaton, V., Brosius, J., Gutell, R., Kopylov, A.M., Dohme, F., Herr, W., Stahl, D.A., Gupta, R. and Woese, C.R. (1981) Nucl.Acids Res. 9, 6167-6189. 18. Noller, H.F. (1984) Ann.Rev.Biochem. 53, 119-162. 19. Huysmans, E., Dams, E., Vandenberghe, A. and De Wachter, R. (1983) Nucl.Acids Res. 11, 2871-2880. 20. Auffray, C. and Rougeon, F. (1980) Eur.J.Biochem. 107, 303-314. 21. Birnboim, H.C. and Doly, J. (1979) Nucl.Acids Res. 7, 1513-1523. 22. Smith, H.O. (1980) In: Methods in Enzymology 65 (Grossman, L. and Moldave, K., Eds) Academic Press, New York, pp. 371-380. 23. Poncz, M., Solowiejczyk, D., Ballantine, M., Schwartz, E. and Surrey, S. (1982) Proc. Natl.Acad.Sci . U.S. 79, 4298-4302. 24. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulson, A.R. (1977) Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci.U.S. 74, 5463-5467. 25. Van der Marel, G.A., Marugg, J.E., De Vroom, E., Wille, G., Tromp, M., Van Boeckel, C.A.A. and Van Boom, J.H. (1982) Recl.Trav.Chim. Pays-Bas 101, 234-241. 26. Donis-Keller, H., Maxam, A.M., Gilbert, W. (1977) Nucl.Acids Res. 4, 2527-2538. 27. Silberklang, M., Prochiantz, A., Haenni, A.L. and Rajbhandary, U.L. (1977) Eur.J.Bio- chem. 72, 465-478. 28. Van der Ploeg, L.H.T., Liu, A.Y.C., Michels, P.A.M., De Lange, T., Borst, P., Majumder, H.K., Weber, H., Veeneman, G.H. and Van Boom, J.H. (1982) Nucl. Acids Res. 10, 3591-3604. 29. Benne, R., Agostinelli, M., De Vries, B.F., Van den Burg, J., Klaver, B. and Borst, P. (1983) In: Mitochondria: Nucleo-Mitochondrial Interactions (Schweyen, R.J., Wolf, K. and Kaudewitz, F., Eds) De Gruyter, Berlin, pp.285-302. 30. Anderson, S., De Bruijn, M.H.L., Coulson, A.R., Eperon, I.C., Sanger, F. and Young, I.G. (1982) J.Mol.Biol. 156, 683-717. 31. Seilhamer, J.J., Olsen, G.J. and Cummings, D.J. (1984) J.Biol.Chem. 259, 5167-5172. 32. Seilhamer, J.J., Gutell, R.R., Cuaings, D.J. (1984) J.Biol.Chem. 259, 5173-5181. 33. Brown, W.M., Prager, E.M., Wang, A. and Wilson, A.C. (1982) Mol. Evol. 18, 225-239. 34. Maly, P. and Brimacombe, R. (1983) Nucl.Acids Res. 11, 7263-7286. 35. Prince, J.B., Taylor, B.H., Thurlow, D.L., Ofengand, J. and Zimmermann, R.A. (1982) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S. 79, 5450-5454. 4189
  • 20. Nucleic Acids Research 36. Douthwaite, S., Christensen, A., Garrett, R.A. (1983) J.Mol.Biol. 169, 249-279. 37. Dubin, D.T. and HsuChen, C.C. (1983) Plasmid 9, 307-320. 38. Chan, Y.L., Gutell, R., Noller, H.P. and Wool, I.G. (1984) J.Biol. Chem. 259, 224-230. 39. Van Knippenberg, P.H., Van Kimmenade, J.M.A. and Heus, H.A. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12, 2595-2604. 40. Chan, Y.L., Endo, Y. and Wool, I.G. (1983) J.Biol.Chem. 258, 12768-12770. 41. Schindler, D.G. and Davies, J.E. (1977) Nucl.Acids Res. 4, 1097-1110. 42. Garrett, R.A., Christensen, A. and Douthwaite, S. (1984) J.Mol.Biol. 179, 689-712. 43. Barta, A., Steiner, G., Brosius, J., Noller, H.F. and Kuechler, E. (1984) Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci.U.S. 81, 3607-3611. 44. Monro, R.E., Staehelin, T., Celma, M.L. and Vazquez, D. (1969) Cold Spring Harbor Symp.Quant.Biol. 34, 357. 45. Sor, F. and Fukuhara, H. (1982) Nucl.Acids Res. 10, 6571-6577. 46. Li, M., Tzagoloff, A., Underbrink-Lyon, K. and Martin, N.C. (1982) J.Biol.Chem. 257, 5921-5928. 47. K5chel, H.G. and Kfintzel, H. (1981) Nucl.Acids Res. 9, 5689-5696. 48. Chao, S., Sederoff, R. and Levings, C.S. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12, 6629-6644. 49. Eperon, I.C., Anderson, S., Nierlich, D.P. (1980) Nature 286, 460-467. 50. Van Etten, R.A., Wahlberg, M.W. and Clayton, D.A. (1980) Cell 22, 157-170. 51. Kobayashi, M., Seki, T., Katsuyuki, Y. and Koike, K. (1981) Gene 16, 297-307. 52. K5chel, H.G. and Kfntzel, H. (1982) Nucl.Acids Res. 10, 4795-4801. 53. HsuChen, C.C., Kotin, R.M., Dubin, D.T. (1984) Nucl.Acids Res. 12, 7771-7785. 4190