Jean Paul Sartre´S Existential Philosophy Essay

Jean Paul SartreВґs Existential Philosophy Essay
Jean Paul Sartre's Existential philosophy posits that is in man, and in man alone, that existence precedes essence. Simply put, Sartre means that man is
first, and only subsequently to his "isness" does he become this or that. The implication in Sartre's philosophy is that man must create his own essence:
it is in being thrown into the world through consciounsess intent, loving, struggling, experiencing and being in the world that man is alllowed to define
itself. Yet, the definition always remains open ended: we cannot say that a human is definitively this or that before its death and indeed, it is the
ultimate nothingness of death that being is defined. The concepts that Sartre examines in Being and Nothingness exist as part of a... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
There is no pre–programmed destiny, no inherent meaning in our lives. Instead, meaning arises from the individual's impetus to will freely, to do what
we choose in any given moment, and to then reflect upon those choices and the ways in which they alter reality and the lives of others. Being and
Nothingness defines every individual as just that: a lone individual. The nature of our being is truly isolated from the nature of other beings and the
world around us – while our actions and essence contain an implicit interconnectedness with the world, while meaning can only come from the
existence of external phenomena, our true self is like an island surrounded by impenetrable nothingness – pregnant with the potential for possibility, but
always empty in–itself.
There is no universal essence that can define every being, there is no divinely–inspired archetype for the human to aspire to (called the adam–kadmon
in Hebrew mysticism), as the existence of such a blue–print for our essence would preclude freedom and bind us to an average, everyday homogeneity.
Considerations of freedom and choice are the crux of existential philosophy, and being that Sartre is one of the primary philosophers of Existentialism,
he examines both concepts with a critical eye in Being and Nothingness. Sartre states plainly that authentic choices are wholey and fully
undetermined; if we choose and decide based merely upon the edicts of a religious code or some sort of secular ethical
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Existentialism And Human Emotions By Jean Paul Sartre
Jean–Paul Sartre 's novel Existentialism and Human Emotions discusses his philosophy that man is responsible for what he is and what he does; that
man chooses his values and makes himself. At the beginning of the book, Sartre defends existentialism against several charges that had been laid
against it. Throughout the book, Sartre refers to the basis of existentialism using the phrase 'existence precedes essence '. With this, phrase lies the basis
for the argument that Existentialism is a Humanism. In this essay, I shall attempt to explore and evaluate Sartre 's argument that "existentialism is a
humanism" by unpacking what is meant by 'existence precedes essence '. I will argue that although the overall argument tends to be a good one, there
are several points which could have been improved upon. In order to understand how it is that existentialism is a humanism, it is first necessary to
understand what both of these terms mean. Humanism is generally referred to as a philosophical and ethical stance that emphasizes the value and
agency of human beings, both individually and collectively, placing a higher value on reason, scientific inquiry and human fulfillment while often
rejecting the importance of a belief in a higher power or deity. Existentialism, according to Sartre, is "a doctrine which makes human life possible and,
in addition, declares that every truth and every action implies a human setting and subjectivity" (Sartre, 10). Another way of putting it

Essay on Jean Paul Sartres Writing
Jean Paul Sartre's Philosophical Writing
Jean Paul Sartre personally believed in the philosophical idea of existentialism, which is demonstrated in his play No Exit. His ideas of existentialism
were profoundly outlined in the play. Based on the idea that mental torture is more agonizing than physical, No Exit leaves the reader with mixed
emotions towards the importance of consequences for one's acts.
Set in Hell, the vision of the underworld is nothing the characters imagined as they are escorted to a Second Empire styled hotel. This is all ironic, in
the fact that Sartre never believed in perdition. He uses this fictitious place to persuade his audience. Hell is used as a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Sartre used this situation to prove that one's consequences are not inevitable. We make our own design in our life, and we have freedom of choice and
responsibility for the outcome of one's acts. By putting these people in a hostile environment, Sartre relates his idea of existentialism.
Not only did these people die due to their malignant choices, but also they afflicted evil on other people. What is happening to them is what happened
to the people that they killed. They are becoming the people of their pasts. Their weaknesses begin to show through, yet they can't confide in one
another. Instead they challenge each other, taking a stab at any hope of existence that they get.
At the end of the play, Sartre finds that there is no need for physical torture. If these people can cause that much pain on Earth, than evil must just
come from them naturally. The only thing that Garcin needs to satisfy him is the proof of his existence. He needs someone to tell him that he's not a
coward., and that is the one thing that Estelle and Inez won't give do. Garcin's last words, "lets get on with it," leave a sarcastic tone over the whole
play. There is definitely uniqueness and isolation in each individual. The laugh that they shared about their future in purgatory at the end enlightened
the meaning of the play. We should make note that people are entirely free and

Jean Paul Sartre Didacticity
Jean–Paul Sartre believes bad faith occurs when: (1) one refuses to admit the existence of one's freedom to choose and; (2) one refuses to admit the
truth of some aspect of one's facticity. Facticity, in this context, refers to the idea that there are some aspects of ourselves that we cannot change
but it can be used to shape and create our own version of ourselves. To deny one's facticity means one has decided to construct an interpretation to
believe that this certain factor is not a part of oneself. In order words, it is lying to oneself about who one really is. This man, as described in page
107, is an example of it because he refuses to acknowledge that he is a homosexual, even with all the evidence in which "he refuses to draw from
them the conclusion which they impose" (Sartre 107). His denial would only be correct if "human reality can not be finally defined by patterns of
conduct" (p. 108). In actuality, his pattern of conduct is "defined as the conduct of a pederast" but he deceives himself about this truth because he wants
put himself ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was stated that "Sartre analyzes this waiter as giving in to a societal demand fro someone occupied in a trade to be nothing other than someone
who has a certain occupation" (Guignon and Pereboom 269). I can see how someone can argue that this is very much true because customers do
not realize that they see workers merely as a means or an object. Sartre describes this as a demand from society to which a worker must "limit
himself to his function as..." whatever his job is (p. 269). I previously worked at AT&T and I can definitely relate to the idea that I am not, in fact,
AT&T. I am "someone whose choices for future possibilities are open to [her]; [she] is not a thing that is restricted to certain functions, the way an
inkwell is" (p. 269). I am playing the role of a representative, just like how the waiter is playing his role as a waiter in the

No Exit From Jean-Paul Sartre And Oedipus Rex
Every person, no matter the age or gender is, and will always be, worried about its destiny. Destiny, or fate, how most people tend to call it,
represents the ultimate step in the road of an individual, the last stage of the play of every living thing. Something so trivial in the life of a person
and yet, all people want to know its meaning. Along fate, there has always been the other subject, the one which describes how we get there, the
choices, the true faith. It is what uttermost people call free will or, the ability to make our own decisions with the hope of one day achieving a greater
goal, to show our true faith. Throughout the course, we have sailed through different stories. Some more interesting than others, but something always
remained likewise. The struggle between fate and free will. This relationship has always been a mystery and to understand it, we will take a look at
how those two perceptions play a role in the stories No Exit, from Jean–Paul Sartre and Oedipus Rex, from Sophocles. No Exit is a play about three
people that enter in a room where each and every one of them has a motive to be there for. It is a hell for them due to the tragedies they committed
while they were alive. In order to put it simply, we will only use one character from each play to transit deep into the relationship between fate and
free will. Joseph Garcin is the first of the three people who arrive at the room. Once alive, he had a normal life, he had a job, a wife, etc. The

No Exit, By Jean Paul Sartre
Existentialism is a relatively new philosophical concept, which flourished soon after the end of World War II. It is focused around a belief that
existence precedes essence, meaning that there is no meaning of life, other than the one each individual assigns during his own lifetime. In the play No
Exit, Jean Paul Sartre explores this philosophy through a triad of individuals whose lives and post–death experiences reflect a range of existentialist
ideas and their contradictions. The three characters, Garcin Inez, and Estelle, are all stuck in a second empire style room, in the depths of hell,
where they have the opportunity to together reflect on all they have ever done. However, it is the behavior they assume in hell that reflects
existential philosophy, not their experiences on earth. Sartre's play No Exit, oozes with existentialist ideas from choice of setting, to personal torture
and a representation of each key concepts of this philosophical movement. The most important part of the whole play is Sartre's choice of setting.
Hell is a taboo concept in society, often pictured as a general idea rather than a specific place. In No Exit, hell is not "hellish" at all; it is, at first
glance, a second empire style room full of extravagant furniture and fancy decorations which, on Earth, would have been synonymous with the perfect
lifestyle. When the three characters walk in for the first time, they think it is a joke and are positively surprised with the beauty of their room.

Jean Paul Sartre Research Paper
Jean–Paul Sartre: Conscience to the World
At the time of his death on the fifteenth of April, 1980, at the age of seventy–four, Jean–Paul Sartre's greatest literary and philosophical works were
twenty–five years in the past. Although the small man existed in the popular mind as the politically inconsistent champion of unpopular causes and
had spent the last seven years of his life in relative stagnation, his influence was still great enough to draw a crowd of over fifty thousand people –
admirers or otherwise – for his funeral procession. Sartre was eminently quotable, a favorite in the press, because his statements were always
controversial. He was the leader of the shortly popular Existential movement in philosophy which turned ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He learned to read at age four and was soon reading voraciously books in French and German, including the Encyclopedia and such authors as Voltaire,
Hugo, and Flaubert (about whom he would write an enormous biography late in life). Though he couldn't understand the meaning behind these works,
the young Sartre felt his place was in words, and began to write his own, usually adventure stories with himself cast as the hero, diary entries, and
letters in verse to his delighted and proud grandfather. [Madsen, 29–32]
While Karl Schweitzer was turning his grandson into an adult, he was turning his daughter back into a child. She had been little educated in her youth
and her father believed that she could not handle herself as an adult. The two were raised, in effect, as brother and sister. Anne–Marie loved Jean–Paul
as a son, but she had no control over his doings, and often fought over his upbringing with Karl. She did not want to see her son turned into an adult at
so young an age, and so she smuggled comic books and children's novels to him. These interactions between mother and grandfather, the constant
struggle for little Poulou's attention and affection built up his ego and gave him an enormous self–confidence that supported him throughout life.
[Gerassi, 46–8].
Relation to Gardner's Model
All of Gardner's

Jean Paul Sartre No Exit Existentialism Essay
It was in the 19 Th centuries where a French writer Jean–Paul Sartre who popularized the concept of existentialism this was during his play No Exit.
Sartre explained Existentialism, which states on the belief that life has no meaning. Each is separate from all other individuals, so each person has
the power to place himself in the position he wishes, that every individual is responsible for his actions. (Reynolds)People should be responsible for
themselves rather than make excuses for the occurrences in their life, the belief that humans have free will. The play was published in 1943. In his
plays introduces us to three main characters that are locked up in a room in hell. The first character is an assassinated journalist by the name of
Garcia, believes that he is in hell for mistreating his wife. The second character is a postal worker and seduces her fellow women by the name Inez.
The final character murdered her child which led to the child's father committing suicide is called Estelle. The three characters in the play are
intelligent and can figure out the situation none of the characters has a clue about the other although locked up in this room each character can be able
to see what is happening on earth they can see their family and friends. These characters are locked up in eternity where they shall spend their time
with people they dislike.
In the room there are no mirrors or windows, bathrooms no one can eat, lights are always on, and the characters are

Jean Paul Sartre
The author emphasizes "Jean–Paul Sartre proposes that ownership extends beyond objects to include intangible things as well." (Jean–Paul Sartre).
This quote states the fact of property, not being only applied to an object but also to experiences, feelings, and talents which are things many people
overlook. Many people believe ownership is something only applied to the amount cars or money that one has in their bank account, but this only
shows the immense emptiness that they have in their lives. And the only way for them to be happy is by filling it up with the only object that only
makes it deeper.Today's society believes that ownership is not based on the amount of tangible goods one has but the experiences they have lived.
Ownership can not only be based on materialistic things but also experiences of a lifetime. When people speak of ownership the first thing to mind is
an object such as a car, house, phone, clothes, or toy; but ownership is not only objects but also an experience of a lifetime. for example having a fear of
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through time many wealthy and influential individuals have had the idea that by having an immense amount of money is the way of being happy but
this is not true. The author emphasizes "When people lack jobs, opportunity, and ownership of property they have little or no stake in their
communities" (Jack Kemp). This quote tries to explain the fact the those who are materialistic suffer when all their riches and power are taken
away do not stand a chance in a normal community. Mainly because they have only learned to love objects and never really love anything else
because of the lack of people in their lives. Which leaves the question how can we avoid becoming so selfish and cold hearted when in today's society
that is all there is? By treasuring what we have now as if it were to be taken away from us

Jean Paul Sartre No Exit Essay
No Exit The philosopher Jean–Paul Sartre develops the philosophy of existentialism. In his famous philosophical drama No Exit, he expounds his
theory of existentialism. From his point of view, existentialism stresses that people are responsible for the consequences of their choices; therefore,
the characters in the play are tortured by each other over their weakness. Garcin suffers the torment because he chooses to be a coward. Garcin is
executed as a deserter; he attempts to flee his country during wartime. Although he claims arbitrarily that he is killed distressingly because he is a
pacifist against the war, Inez knows that he is making an excuse for himself; she knows that he is just too much of a coward to admit to his crimes....
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Estelle not only has an affair but also drowns her illegitimate baby. But Estelle persists in saying that she just dies of pneumonia but not dies from
her crimes; she claims that she does not belong to hell. However, Garcin and Inez get to know about her character, and she finally confesses to her
crimes. "GARCIN: Go away. You're even fouler than she. I won't let myself get bogged in your eyes. You're soft and slimy.Ugh! [Bangs on the door
again.] Like an octopus. Like a quagmire" (Sartre 41) Garcin finds Estelle foul when she refuses Inez's seduction then courts him. He holds off her.
Estelle gets irritated and blames on Inez. "ESTELLE:Right! In that case, I'll stop her watching. [She picks up the paper–knife from the table, rushes at
INEZ and stabs her several times.]" (Sartre 45) Estelle is overwhelmed by her anger. She tries to kill Inez to get rid of her, totally forgetting that they
are already dead. Her false step makes Garcin and Inez disgust her much more. But she cannot blame on anyone because she brings this to herself by her

No Exit By Jean Paul Sartre
In No Exit, a play written by philosopher and existentialist Jean–Paul Sartre, three characters are placed in a small room assumed to be hell with
minimal furniture, space, and points of interest. The two women and one man are forced to face their own as well as the others' sins and true natures,
exposing each other in a raw truth. In many of his works, Sartre attempts to get important messages across that coincide with his philosophies. A piece
that is easy to use to compare with the play is the essay The Humanism in Existentialism, as everything written in it are his own thoughts and
commentary on life, how it should be lived, humanity, and how humans relate to each other and the world around them. That being said, he purposely
writes No Exit in a way that blatantly disregards some of his main points. More specifically, through his writing of the characters in the play, Sartre
very clearly demonstrates his contempt for and low standards of humanity by portraying each individual as having unique aspects of his negativity.
One character in the play is named Estelle Rigault. She lived a life full of sin, including adultery and murder, before she died of pneumonia and was
sent to hell. Estelle, though married to an older man, had an affair with another named Roger, which resulted in a baby. While on a trip with her
lover, she dropped the baby over a balcony into a lake and drowned it. When asked about the baby, Estelle says, "'It pleased him to no end, having a
daughter. It

John Paul Sartre Existentialism
Yesterday, I enrolled for class. Now this decision was definite as I couldn't go back and not enrol. However, the actual action of me actually attending
was completely my choice; a conscious decision. Although it was compulsory to attend, nothing given could determine the outcome. John Paul Sartre
an eminent existentialist, would argue that just because I made a commitment didn't necessarily mean I needed to follow through with it. Enrolling was
part of the facticity of the in–itself. I had only made the decision, I had to follow through with an action. Sartre would contend that by forcing myself
to attend if I didn't want to would be trying to escape from my freedom. Sartre, stated that the basic principle of existentialism was existence precedes
essence for human beings. In his essay, Existentialism is Humanism, Sartre attempts to answer the accusations. Essentially, he rejects the notion of any
innate human nature; implying that because our essence comes to be after our existence, we are free to choose and live our lives accordingly. This
essay will discuss Sartre's explanation of the expression and the related implications.
Sartre was the prominent philosopher of the existentialism movement. As an atheist, Sartre supported against the existence of God, and argued that for
pre–determined human essence to exist, a designer must exist. Whereas, medieval philosophers like Plato, believed in the existence of God and that
we had an essence before existing. Sartre rejects

The play No Exit, by Jean–Paul Sartre is about three people that die and go to hell. Joseph Garcin, a journalist executed by a firing squad for trying to
desert during a war; Inez Serrano, a post–office clerk murdered by her lover which left a gas stove on while she slept; and Estelle Rigault, a woman
who married an older rich man and died due to pneumonia. They all expected physical torture in hell. However, all they found was a plain room
with some furniture that always had the light on, no windows, no beds, nothing that would reflect or work as a mirror. The three of them were
trapped inside the room. After discussing among themselves, they confessed their crimes and deduced that the torture was psychological. They also
realized that they had been placed together so that each of them was to become the torturer of the other two. Each character began to ask things
from the others to fulfill a need they all had, which only led them to more despair. Due to this, Garcin concluded that "hell is other people" (pag26).
A. Petrusso argues in his article "No Exit" that the three main characters of the play have in common a display of cowardice. Certainly, all of them
seem to be cowards at some moment and one character exhibits it more than the others. He also argues that certain actions and behaviors are merely
the cowardice of the character when in fact, it rather seems more like fear. The examples and arguments used by Petrusso seem to simply catalog the
main characters as

Jean Paul Sartre : Existentialism Philosophy
Jean Paul Sartre Existentialism Philosophy
Jean Paul Sartre is considered the father of Existentialist philosophy. Following the Second World War, Jean Paul's writings set the tone for an
intellectual life. Sartre was born in Paris and he spent most of his life there. Having attended various prestigious Parisian schools with traditional
philosophical education, he was introduced to the history of Western philosophy with a bias toward Cartesianism and neo Kantianism.
As soon as the World War ended, Sartre became a solemn reader of Hegel and Marx and just like the majority of his generation. Much like them he
came under the influence of Kojeve 's Marxist and protoexistentialist interpretation of Hegel, though he never attended any of the famous lectures in the
1930's as did Lacan and Merleau–Ponty. Jean Hyppolite come out with translations and annotations of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, which
manifested Sartre's keener study of the influential German philosopher. Sartre's "Marxism" remained descriptive to his existentialism and definitely not
the contrary (Existentialism Is a Humanism).
Sartre's early work is evaluated by a phenomenological state. This is because Sartre used his own interpretation of Husserl's method through a unique
form of analysis and international eidetic. The moral sense by which this is assigned gives meaning to the objects that are analyzed. That is what is
sought in the particular examples though examinations and essential structure (Internet

John Locke, Paul Sartre, And Georg L. Hegel
Shainna Hayes
PHL 492
Final Paper
April 14, 2015
The subject of essence is not something that the average person thinks about everyday, or ever in their life. There are several varying arguments over
essence including arguments from John Locke, Jean–Paul Sartre, and Georg W. F. Hegel. Two of these men argue that essence is something that we
gain later in life once we have made the choice of who we want to be. The third argues that we all have the same essence from the time we are born.
The arguments of these three philosophers will become very important in answering the question: Is it true or plausible that we humans have no
essence until we choose to have an essence? Jean–Paul Sartre and Georg W. F. Hegel will support the affirmative... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
One cannot know that a person will be kind and compassionate before they have done an act to show this to be true. Another important word that will
be referred to often in this paper is being, which is defined simply as "existence." Being may seem really simple but everything has to have basic
characteristics to exist in the form that it has come to take.
In class we discussed Jean–Paul Sartre's argument that under the terms of atheist existentialism it is plausible humans are "a being in whom existence
precedes essence, a being which exists before being defined by any concept" (Sartre 1). Sartre is often remembered to have said that humans are
condemned to be free. This means that they cannot hide behind excuses or blame their actions on anything but themselves, not even human nature
(Sartre 2). However, this also means that humans are free to define themselves through their own choices and cannot be predefined by human nature
since, according to Sartre, existence precedes essence. Sartre argues that people are inherently free, whether they like it or not. They are free to make
their own decisions and define themselves with their personal actions and values. If Sartre is right, it has to be plausible that existence precedes
essence or else humans would not have the freedom to create their own nature, they would be defined from the moment they came to be meaning they
are not actually free. In the Phaedrus Socrates argues that no one knows what is

No Exit By Jean-Paul Sartre And Oedipus Rex
Symphony of Life Every person, no matter the age or gender is, and will always be, worried about its destiny. Destiny, or fate, how most people
tend to call it, represents the ultimate step in the road of an individual, the last stage of the play of every living thing. Something so common in the
life of a person and yet, all people want to know its meaning. Along fate, there has always been the other subject, the one which describes how we
get there, the choices, the true faith. It is what most people call free will or, the ability to make our own decisions with the hope of one day achieving
a greater goal, to show our true faith. Throughout the course, we have sailed through different stories. Some more interesting than others but,
something always remained the same. The struggle between fate and free will. This relationship has always been a mystery and to understand it we
will take a look at how those two perceptions play a role in the stories No Exit, from Jean–Paul Sartre and Oedipus Rex, from Sophocles. No Exit is a
play about three people that enter in a room where each and every one of them has a motive to be there for. It is a hell for them due to the tragedies
they committed while they were alive. In order to put it simply, we will only use one character from this play to travel deep into the relationship
between fate and free will. Joseph Garcin, is the first of the three people who arrive at the room. Once alive he had a normal life, he had a job, a wife,
etc.

Jean Paul Sartre and the Fundamental Project
Jean Paul Sartre and the Fundamental Project In this paper I am addressing Jean Paul Sartre premise of the fundamental project. In my
presentation I will first give a brief over view of Sartre's existentialism. Next Sartre's a notions of the spontaneous and reflective phases of
consciousness will be my focus Upon discussing the reflective phase I will go into depth about the fundamental project, and why it is pursued, and I
will give examples from No Exit. I will conclude by making a brief contrast and comparisson between Garcin, a character from No Exit, and myself.
Of all the philosophers we have studied in our forum, I find I am most intrigued by the opinions of Jean Paul Sartre. Jean Paul Sartre is accredited with
articulating... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That is man is acknowledging his facticity, that he come from athe thing, but he knows that he is more than just a thing. Because he comes to this
logical conclusion he is acting in good faith; he is not pursuing a fundamental project in an attempt to circumvent the possibility of angst (anguish).
The outcome of the path of good faith is that man manifests his freedom authentically and therefore his freedom is real. Those who do not act clear
headed, and fail to make a balance between facticity and transcendence will inevitably fall into angst. Angst (German for anguish) is what is felt by
those who cannot accept that they come from the realm of the ГЄtre en soi (realm of the being in it self) and make attempts to deny there past. In an
attempt to flee their past and the anguish that can accompany it Sartre says some will pursue a fundamental project. This project entails attempting to
make ourselves a virtuoso or a God that is constrained by neither the realm of the ГЄtre en soi nor the realm of the ГЄtre pour soi (realm of the being
for itself). Sartre considers this "forsaking the whole for the sake of the part" because society meaning to the fundamental pursuer is forgone to
address the fears of this individual. Sartre says to do this is to act in bad

Jean Paul Sartre : Philosophy And The Existence Of God
Jean–Paul Sartre was an influential 20th century existentialist who mostly acquired information on the study of consciousness and the study of being.
Sartre spent many years studying philosophy and the existence of God mostly studying the works of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. He
became a Professor of Philosophy at Le Havre in 1931 and then began teaching at LycГ©e Pasteur in Paris from 1937 to 1939. During his career,
Sartre wrote about many philosophical theories, some notable books include La nausГ©e published in 1938, Being and Nothingness published in
1943, and many more lectures and literature for individuals to read for years to come. Sartre was an important figure of existentialism and was
awarded the Nobel Prize in 1964 but turned it down. Some of Jean–Paul Sartre's existentialist principles are the act of free will, forced to take
responsibility for all actions, and the existence of God.
Jean–Paul Sartre was a renowned intellectual, writer and philosopher. He was born in Paris in 1905 the only child of a French Navy officer,
Jean–Baptiste Sartre and Anne–Marie Schweitzer. At an early age his father died of a fever and shortly thereafter his mother moved in with her parents
in Meudon, this was instrumental in Sartre's journey to philosophy. Her father taught her son mathematics and classical literature. At the young age of
twelve Sartre's mother remarried and the family moved to La Rochelle where he was bullied by other children from the area. As a teenager in

The play No Exit, by Jean–Paul Sartre, is about three people that die and go to hell. Joseph Garcin, a journalist executed by a firing squad for trying
to desert during a war; Inez Serrano, a post–office clerk murdered by her lover which left a gas stove on while she slept; and Estelle Rigault, a woman
who married an older rich man and died due to pneumonia. They all expected physical torture in hell. However, all they found was a plain room
with some furniture that always had the light on, no windows, no beds, and nothing that would reflect or work as a mirror. The three of them were
trapped inside the room. After discussing among themselves, they confessed their crimes and deduced that the torture was psychological. They also
realized that they had been placed together so that each of them was to become the torturer of the other two. Each character began to ask things
from the others to fulfill a need they all had, which only led them to more despair. Due to this, Garcin concluded that "hell is other people" (pag26).
A. Petrusso argues in his article "No Exit" that the three main characters of the play have in common a display of cowardice. Certainly, all of them
seem to be cowards at some moment and one character exhibits it more than the others. He also argues that certain actions and behaviors are merely
the cowardice of the character when in fact, it rather seems more like fear. The examples and arguments used by Petrusso seem to simply catalog the
main characters as

HsГјn Tzu and Jean-Paul Sartre Comparison of two Philosophers
Fraud, murder, courage, and strong will are all words that can be linked to humanity. These words will often raise questions like, who did it, how they
did it, or why. Can it be that the true answer to these questions lies in getting a better understanding of our human nature? Does man act according to
his divine plan, or is he taught how to act? In analyzing the works of HsГјn Tzu and Jean–Paul Sartre, I will determine which of these two philosophers
offers the strongest foundation for living an ethical life in the modern era.
HSГњN TZU
HsГјn Tzu is one of the main founders of eastern philosophy and is considered one of the three great sages in China along with Mencius and
Confucious. Tzu's style of writing is poetic and easy to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Tzu argues that the sages created laws to correct man's evil nature like those previously mentioned, and therefore the sages are valued and needed.
According to Tzu man does not suffer any kind of anguish or pain from doing evil acts, in doing them they just fulfill their needs and feel pleasure.
On the other hand, Sartre believes that man, "always chooses the good, and nothing can be good for us without being good for all" (145) otherwise,
man suffers "anguish from direct responsibility to the other men to whom it involves" (146) choosing the opposite is like choosing evil. Therefore,
man teaches himself to do good because his choices are equal to those choices acceptable for all mankind.
I agree with Tzu, that people who have not learned the value of caring for others first without receiving any prize in return for their good actions
could not feel any remorse in being selfish since that is all that they know. Like Neanderthals, it takes many years to evolve and many more years for
learning to happen so that man may be able to act civilized. However, once one has learned to do good it depends on every man to continue to
practice the teachings he has acquired and also to keep learning more than necessary to grow.
Comparisons that they make using the word Artisan are also employed differently. Tzu uses the example of the potter and his clay, which the artisan
turns to a vessel. Tzu states that, "the vessel then, is the

Existentialism In Jean-Paul Sartre
Many people use the guidelines that society teaches them to organize themselves; justifying their beliefs and actions and giving their lives purpose.
Whether it is religion, a constitution, state law, or personal belief, everyone relies on something. But what if society couldn't use these crutches, these
templates, these rules to give meaning to our lives? What if one couldn't bring themselves to believe in these paradigms? What if they find
inconstitiouses in all of these philosophies? What can society believe in then? Is all of life a sham? Are all of our thoughts, hopes, dreams and beliefs
meaningless? Existentialism is the philosophy which answers these questions, and it is what Jean–Paul Sartre explores in his three plays: No Exit, The
Respectful Prostitute and The Flies. Existentialism is a philosophy started in the 20th century, which playwright Jean–Paul Sartre let greatly influence
his work, bringing existentialism to the educated world. This philosophy helps to guide society through the uncertainties in life. A concept that fills in
the gaps between the meaning of one thing and the meaninglessness of another. Putting emphasis on the individual instead of society as a whole. We
spend our lives striving towards a purpose in the world that we will never be able to achieve, as meaning is determined by the individual. Each person
must wield their personal freedom to decide for themselves what is right or wrong, without the influence of society or religion.

The Life of Jean-Paul Sartre
Existentialism could be defined as a philosophical theory that focuses on the individual person being a free and responsible person who determines
his or her own development through acts of will. Existentialism is a thesis that has been discussed by some of the greatest philosophical minds ever to
live. Minds such as Kierkegaard and Nietzsche all had their own view on what existentialism was and major impact on the development of this thesis.
Each of these philosophies played a huge influence on a great mind that would come later on in history. That was the mind of Jean–Paul Sartre. Sartre,
who is considered one of the great philosophical minds, based many of his ideas around the idea of existentialism and phenomenology. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
("Jean–Paul Sartre") As a boy, Sartre received much of his early education from tutors. In 1924, Jean–Paul Sartre started studying at the Г‰cole
Normale SupГ©rieure in Paris. (Media) He graduated in 1929 with a doctorate in Philosophy. (Channel) With the help of a stipend from the Institut
Francais, Jean–Paul Sartre was able to study the philosophies of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger in Berlin, Germany. Husserl and Heidegger
were both philosophers whose beliefs were centered on existentialism and phenomenology. Both are subjects Sartre expressed in many of his
writing and plays. In 1931, Sartre became a Professor of Philosophy at Le Havre. He would later teach at Laon until he eventually became a
professor at the LycГ©e Pasteur in Paris from 1937 to 1939. (Media) Sartre had many famous works that bolstered him up to the top ranks of
philosophers. Sartre's first novel, Nausea, 1938, and the collection of stories called The Wall and other Stories, 1938, brought him immediate
recognition and success. They dramatically express Sartre's early existentialist themes of alienation and commitment, and of salvation through art. His
central philosophical work, Being and Nothingness, 1943, is an essay on Phenomenological Ontology. (Media) The overall reason Sartre wrote Being
and the Nothingness was to demonstrate that free will exists. (Levy) Another one of Sartre's

The Backbone Of The Characters Of Jean Paul Sartre 's No Exit
The backbone of the characters in Jean–Paul Sartre's No Exit consists of the concept of bad faith and subjection. Bad faith is essentially self–deception.
Sartre views existentialism as being completely free and responsible at the same time. When one realizes his freedom, he becomes scared of his
power. By deceiving oneself into thinking one is not completely free, one delves into bad faith. It can range from religion to sex to morality.
Subjection is apparent as well. The play depicts three characters,Garcin, Inez, and Estelle, who have all been sent to Hell because of their crimes
on the Earth. They all struggle to deal with themselves and each other in Hell. These characters are all victims of bad faith and overreliance on
others for self validation. In the first place, Garcin is a victim of bad faith in many circumstances. Garcin treats his wife poorly, although that is not
what makes him succumb to bad faith; it is the reasons for his treatment towards his wife. He specifically explains that it was easy to abuse his
wife because of her martyred look. He calls her a "victim by vocation" (Sartre 14). He gives his wife the role of a martyr and, in his eyes, that is all she
is. Confining people to a role is practicing bad faith, whether it is defining others or oneself. By giving his wife a title, Garcin is turning her into an
object rather than acknowledge her as a person. He is tricking himself into thinking his wife is an object, an act of self–deception. In the same

The Themes Of Hell In No Exit By Jean Paul Sartre
No Exit, a play by Jean Paul Sartre, discusses many themes about the human psyche. These themes are demonstrated by Sartre's ability to develop
characters and allow his characters interact with each other. Some of the main themes in No Exit are the concepts that hell can mean facing your own
defects, whether people have free will, and the concept of "bad faith". These concepts are exhibited through each of the character's backgrounds and the
relationships developed among the characters throughout the play.
The most impressive part about the concept of hell being other people is that each one is a horrible person in his or her own right and cannot stand
each other for being just as horrible. This concept is realized by the characters relatively early in the play when Garcin and Inez first meet and
decidedly hate each other for their own reasons and decide silence is the best option for them. This silence is broken once Estelle is introduced and
the trio cannot stop bickering with each other. Garcin still playing his gentlemanly role proclaims, "So the solution's easy enough; each of us stays
put in his or her corner and takes no notice of the others." (Sartre 11). Jackson presents the concept that reflective consciousness which delves into
other people is hell (6). This explains how they all realize that they were sentenced to spend an eternity together based on the fact that they are all
horrible reflections of each other. All of the characters form a sort of circle

Jean Paul Sartre 's Being And Nothingness
The existentialist philosophy has one governing ideal: we are not born anything, in fact all that we are is the pure results of our choices. These
choices, are constructed from our own resources as well as those that are given to us when we came into existence by society. We do not only create
our values, we create ourselves. Simone De Beauvoir, for instance, creates a limit to this existential idea of self–creation, qualifying absolute liberty –
an idea that is recurring in Jean–Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness. In opposition to this, de Beauvoir presents an ambiguous image of human liberty,
in which women fight against the apparent inconveniences of the female figure. In The Second Sex, her most famous chef–d'oeuvre, de Beauvoir
sketches an existential story of a woman's life. A story revolving around the ways in which the female attitude towards her body and her corporal
functions change throughout the years as well as the ways in which society influences her viewpoints. "One is not born, but becomes, a woman" is
one of De Beauvoir's most famous and revolutionary quotes. It focuses on the process in which both society and a woman's personal identity
defines her as a 'woman', in essence. In fact, De Beauvoir's studies reveal that the woman body is presented in both a positive and a negative
spectrum. The woman can be both oppressed, as well as free. She argues continuously on the ambiguity of women as their bodies can be both used as
a vehicle for freedom and one for

The Allegory Of The Cave By Jean Paul Sartre
Jean Paul Sartre's wrote about Existentialism and human emotions, in his book Existentialism. It was fascinating to read a piece that questions your
faith in God and the way you are living your life. Sartre wrote that he does not believe in human nature or essence that precedes individuals. He
rather believes that our existence precedes our essence; we must create our own essence. Nothing, not God nor evolution, created us for any purpose
other than the purpose we choose which means we have free will. Sartre knows that we are biological beings but that there is no general truths about
what we should or ought to be. Humans are radically free because we have nothing that is truly stopping us from giving an action or idea. In his
words, we are "condemned to be free." Consciousness is also aware that it is not the objects it ponders, that many... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Existentialism is not gloomy because people find that humans who follow a god that gives them rules, are not free. Religious people try to see the
optimist part of it rather than the pessimist because they want to comfort themselves. The Allegory of the Cave because the allegory makes you
question what we know and learn now things from it. This would relate to Sartre's belief that we must create our own essence because to create a
belief or soul, we must use the knowledge of what we already know. The Socratic Method is also important because it encourages people to challenge
common–sense beliefs and develop chear definitions. Though, perhaps if we cannot find definitions, knowing what something is not brings us closer
to understanding. Existentialism discards how everyday people follow each other, existentialism relates to the Socratic Method because it is going
against how everyone perceives their life and creates their own belief in what their individual life is

Existentialism In Nausea, By Jean-Paul Sartre
Nausea is a fictional book by Jean–Paul Sartre that discusses the life of a troubled Antoine Roquentin. The victim is suffering from nausea, which is a
mental illness. According to Roquentin, the disease is affecting his brain, and he has a feeling that he is going crazy. For this reason, he decides to
record all the changes in a dairy. Through the diary, he monitors the changes that he has no idea of its origin. Sartre uses the life of Roquentin with the
attempt of bringing meaning to life. He does this through the use of existentialist ideas and complimenting it with fiction. The fiction by Sartre is
essential to the ancient and modern world. It is a book that significantly contributes to individuals' reflection of their lives and coming up with ways of
improving their lives and those around them. Additionally, it highlights the challenges that people go through in the society. This paper will illustrate
that existentialism is the best way one can figure out or understand his life.
Analysis
Nausea is a well–crafted book that has extensively brought out the idea of existentialism and the impact it has on our lives. The author first introduces
Antoine to the readers, and he is facing many difficulties in his life. He is suffering from a disease called nausea and does not have an idea of its
origin. The illness affected his brain and body that prevents him from making rational decisions. In an attempt at gaining control of the situation,
Antoine develops a habit

Fate And Free Will In Oedipus Tyrannus And Jean-Paul Sartre
From philosophers to religious scholars, from thinkers to the everyman, the nature of the will of man has been a subject of reflection for millennia.
More specifically, mankind has wondered if a life is solely under the control of the individual, or is it controlled or manipulated by an exterior force.
Many have explored this topic, and have considered its countless implications. Unsurprisingly, this debate of fate versus free–will has been a subject of
many works of literature. Two compelling examples of literature that explore this theme are Sophocles' tragedy Oedipus Tyrannus andJean–Paul Sartre
's one act play No Exit. Despite being written centuries apart, these two writers examine the subject in an interesting manner, such that they both cause
the audience to consider both sides of the debate, and furthermore consider how their actions affect their everyday lives.
In the first place, it must be acknowledged that the setting of these two works of literature plays a significant role in developing the theme of man's
will against fate. Yes, Oedipus Tyrannus takes place in Thebes, but the most overlooked and obvious point is that the events of the narrative take
place on Earth. As opposed to No Exit, which is set in Hell. This contrast of settings is crucial, as Sartre implies that on Earth man has complete
control of his actions and therefore a semblance of free will; while in Hell, man has no control of his life or actions, because everything is preset for his
eternal

Women And Jews By Simone De Beauvoir And Jean-Paul Sartre
From the continental European perspective shared by Simone de Beauvoir and Jean–Paul Sartre, two groups would have stood out as the most
historically marginalized; women and Jews. For much of European history, both Jewish people and women were denied the rights and privileges
afforded to even the least privileged Christian men. They could not hold their own lands, were barred from all but a select few professions, and
lived with the constant threat of organized violence ready to be turned against them if they ever stepped out of line. In a sense, both woman and Jew
are used as an other for their outgroups, male and Gentile respectively, to define themselves apart from. Accordingly de Beauvoir and Sartre manage
to illustrate substantial similarities between the two groups in their respective analyses that greatly affect their ultimate treatment, even as through
their limited scope and personal biases. Chiefly among these similarities is how both the idea of "woman" and "Jew" are created classes, social
constructs made in bad faith. While there will obviously be female humans and Jewish people, the identities of woman and Jew exist only because
those who were not female and Jewish have labeled them as such. "If the Jew did not exist," writes Sartre in Anti–Semite and Jew, "the anti–Semite
would invent him." (8) However, one key difference exists between the two: Jews present a hidden and existential threat to their foes that women never
will. Even the most strident opponent

Jean Paul Sartre Research Paper
Jean Paul Sartre
Life
Jean–Paul Charles Aymard Sartre was a French philosopher, writer and political activist, and one of the central figures in 20th Century French
philosophy and specifically existentialism. ("Jean–Paul Sartre")
Sartre was born in Paris, France on 21 June 1905. At a young age, his grandfather developed his interest in classical literature and reading, As a
teenager he became interested in philosophy and went on to study it at Г‰cole Normale SupГ©rieure until 1929. There, he met Simone de Beauvoir
and they became lifelong friends as they challenged cultural and social expectations of society. ("Jean–Paul Sartre")
After he received his doctorate from at Г‰cole Normale SupГ©rieure, he served in the French Army until 1931 and afterward ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He contributed greatly and his form of existentialism is often discussed in philosophy and everyday life.
In Sartre's Existentialism, "existence is prior to essence", which means that it is actions that determine qualities of individuals. Choices make the
individual who he or she is. He firmly believed that everyone, always and everywhere, has choices and therefore freedom or a choice of actions. This
freedom is empowering, but it also comes with responsibility.
In his 1946 essay, Existentialism is a Humanism which is regarded by many as one of the defining texts of the Existentialist movement, he states: "Man
is nothing else but that which he makes of himself. That is the first principle of existentialism." Thus, he believed that freedom requires total
responsibility, in the face of which we experience and genuine human dignity can be achieved only in our active acceptance of these emotions.
Sartre believed a godless world is the best world as it has no meaning. The lack of meaning allows individuals to detach themselves from things in
order to give them meaning. There is no purpose or goal other than the goals the individual sets from him or herself. A godless world forces people to
create meaning and purpose and understand the

No Exit By Jean Paul Sartre Essay
The Play Text, Its Context and the Ideas presented in the play Why did I choose this play? I choose the play No Exit by Jean–Paul Sartre as the play
to explore for my director 's notebook. The reason I choose this text was because I wanted to find something out of the box and something that
made the audience think. This play is also a shorter play, so I think that it would be able to be able to keep the audience's attention to the message
of the play. This play is an absurdist play, and the topic of hell is the main idea of this play. I think the topic something interesting to use, and also a
good way to keep the audience entertained. The characters of this play seem very real, and I enjoy how these characters choices are relatable to
the audience. The Pros: This play is something that fits with my wish of making the audience think and this play is well known. This play also
has a lot of information pertaining to it. This play is not to long, and it will have a small cast. Since the play is short it will be easier to keep my
audience 's attention for the whole play. The smaller cast would make it easier to direct, and also the cast would be an ensemble. The Cons: This
play is originally in a different language so it has been translated into what I have been studying. This play was also written during a very terrible
time for the world. This playwright is also no longer alive, so there is no way to know if I am completely following the playwright 's intent. About this

Existentialism, By Jean Paul Sartre
Yamaris Gonzalez–Rivera, Essay #3, Ch 10 & Ch 12, November 17, 2015
Existentialist Philosopher JP Sartre As a human beings, we have many choices that we need to make on a daily basis throughout our entire lives as
well. Those choices that we make, may have consequences and may affect us or our family members in the long run. Therefore, throughout my essay I
will give a summary from Jean Paul Sartre's "Ethical Authenticity," in chapter 10 and the "Existentialism is a Humanism," his primary reading. I will
also be answering the questions to the primary readings. Jean Paul Sartre was a French Existentialist philosopher and a writer during the mid
twentieth century. He was recognized as the most influential thinker in the existentialist movement and best known for his lecture in the primary
reading "Existentialism is a Humanism." He studied phenomenology in Berlin during the two World Wars which lead him to being a prisoner of war,
held by Nazi's. Sartre was able to escape from the Nazi's and joined forces with the French Resistance Movement. Which had influenced him on his
outlook on politics and life. Sartre then inspired one of the most extensive philosophical movements; the movement of existentialism. The movement
to reach the people outside the academic world. Sartre did not believe in God, and had stated that there is "no God, no absolute moral values."(pg.
508) It being no master plan, and it making no sense at all, happening in an absurd life and very randomly. The

How Does Jean-Paul Sartre Use Social Norms In No Exit
No Exit is a French satire play written by Jean–Paul Sartre in 1944. The play takes place in hell with three unfortunate souls, Estelle, Inez, and
Cradeau, as the main characters, with the only other character being a boy who shows them to their room where they spend all of eternity. The
three characters accurately demonstrate the upper, middle, and lower classes of society. In society they are used to behaving certain ways based on
class, called social norms. These social norms are an ideology, which is a belief system, created by society's cultural conditioning over a lifetime.
Once locked in a room with nothing but three chairs and a fireplace, the three characters are forced to live without social norms. Without these
monitored behaviors, their identities fade away exposing their deep fears and thoughts. In the beginning of the play, Estelle, Inez, and Cradeau
struggle to stick with their social norms, and force one another to try to adhere to their own social norms they are used to. One of the first instances of
this is when Cradeau starts to take off his coat, as he was used to doing while at the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cradeau, who used to mistreat his wife, was shot by deserting the war he was a collaborator for, and Inez was killed by gas that her lover left on
after she seduced another woman. Although Estelle claims there has been a mistake since she died of pneumonia, she eventually confesses that
she had an affair and drowned her illegitimate baby. All that is left of them is their fears and desires. Cradeau craves his masculinity by not wanting to
be called a coward, which is a fear he had while living, and did not overcome before he was killed. Estelle has an unstable sense of self, since she has
always felt alive when she could see herself as others saw her, without it she feels like she is not real. Inez is the only one to assert her freedom and
existence, despite being in

Jean Paul Sartre on the Anti Semite Essay
Jean Paul Sartre on the Anti Semite Describe the anti–semitic person's attitude toward reason. How does his attitude toward reason reflect or reveal his
general attitude toward life, the human condition and even himself? How does his attitude toward reason compare to the attitude of the rational man?
Sartre explains that an Anti–Semite is "impenetrable", and it is actually something he strives to achieve. By gaining impenetrability, the Anti–Semite
strengthens his beliefs because another person is not capable of reasoning with him. Sartre believes the Anti–Semite's "reason" is based on the passion
for hatred that he holds for the Jew. Sartre uses the word "monoideism" to explain the irrational Anti–Semite's passion... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The rational man is open to all ideas; he strives to gain more factual information to back his views. However, the Anti–Semite remains closed–minded
and chooses to be ignorant to the fact that his beliefs are not valid. The rational man seeks information, and does not feel content until his quest for
knowledge is over. The rational man is even "hesitant" when he states his ideas, or comes to conclusions. He realizes that there are other views on
every subject, and he wants to contemplate over every possible idea that he is able to think of until he reaches his own. The "reasonable man" will
even admit when he is proven wrong, and change his view. The Anti–Semite wishes not to change, and claims, even when proven wrong, that his
beliefs are still of a valid and true nature. Sartre believes the actual content of truth frightens the Anti–Semite. The idea of there being other views is
ignored by the Anti–Semite. He chooses to remain "innate". They want to come to a conclusion right away, and consider only the factors that benefit
him. Sartre blames the Anti–Semites ability to ignore reasoning and research on "emotional bias". Through this emotional bias, he feels at ease
because he is in a state of bliss; he feels as though he knows all he needs to know about life. In conclusion, the Anti–Semite disregards any other ideas
besides his own, and those of his

Jean-Paul Sartre And Bad Faith : A Second Concept Of...
A second concept of existentialism is Bad Faith. French existentialist Jean–Paul Sartre believed that Bad Faith is the fundamental issue that prevents
individuals from living an authentic life. He focused on the concept of radical freedom, in which the individual always has a choice. Since life
itself and the universe is absurd, humans are completely responsible for creating their own destiny. Every action performed by the individual
ultimately stems from the innate freedom they possess. Sartre looks at the darker aspects of freedom, and notes how "Man is condemned to be
free" (LГ¶with 123). He is suggesting that individuals are thrown into a meaningless world, where he or she is forced to decide for him or herself.
As rational beings, humans seek answers and guidelines for how to live, because they do not want to decide for themselves. Because, deciding for
oneself means holding oneself responsible for every action performed. The thought of complete and utter responsibility frightens people and influences
their decisions to commit acts of bad faith. Living in bad faith is similar to a life of self–deception. Sartre believed people, under the pressures of social
forces, adopt mannerisms or values associated with functions, like their job and use it to deny their radical freedom. They mold themselves into
objects and allow themselves to fall victim to greater forces of society. In Sartre's Being and Nothingness, he writes of a waiter who convinces himself
that he is nothing

No Exit is that the Setting of Hell by Jean-Paul Sartre
Hell, although we will most likely never actually know anything about it for sure, has always seemed to be brought up in the media, talked about on
television, and depicted in different ways and through all of the different types of media there are around the world. For example, one version of Hell
as described in Jean–Paul Sartre's play No Exit is that the setting of Hell is a mostly empty room in which three people are selected to stay for
eternity (Sartre). Whether they were selected by chance or at random, nobody can tell for sure (Northern). The characters, Garcin, Inez, and Estelle
try to figure out why they were all placed together, but will never know even though they have an eternity together to figure it out (Sartre). The
thought that this setting could be a Hell in it's own can be hard to comprehend. The fact of the matter is that the three people have no looking glass
in which to see themselves, no way to know how the other people in the room feel about them, and no way to get away from each other, for they are
locked in this room for eternity (Sartre). The fact that one of the women, Estelle, is a sort of conceited woman who wants to see how she looks all the
time makes her feel the need to ask the other woman, Inez, how she looks (Sartre). When she does this, it shows the way that it is human nature that we
are constantly worried and wondering how they look through another person's eyes (Northern). The idea of the Northern Existential Group that "Hell is
other

No Exit, By Jean Paul Sartre
Over the years the concept of an afterlife has been perpetually questioned by many authors and philosophers including the French playwright, Jean–Paul
Sartre. Sartre questions the known layout of hell and instead offers a new idea of people, in fact, being each other's hell. He creates a fictional story
about terrible people who must spend the entirety of their afterlives suffering with each other. In, "No Exit," a play written by Jean–Paul Sartre, the act
of self reflection and it's consequences are shown through the egocentric characterization of main protagonists Garcin, Estelle, and Inez and the
seemingly bland setting. Joseph Garcin is an middle aged gentleman who worked as a writer for a newspaper in his life and is the first character
introduced in the play. He is shown as a masculine character who is very sure of himself but the audience quickly learns that this is false and that he
actually is very cowardice and needs the approval of others. In the play he becomes obsessed with Inez's opinion of him and he cries desperately
begging, "So, Inez, we 're alone. Only you two remain to give a thought to me. She– she doesn 't count. It 's you who matter; you who hate me. If you 'll
have faith in me I 'm saved." (Sartre 44). This quote shows just how much of a coward Garcin really is and that his personal hell is other people
thinking of him badly. This constant need of approval is what put Garcin where he is in the play and ultimately lead to his eternal torture. Judith

Jean Paul Sartre : The Philosophy Of Existentialism
Jean Paul Sartre is a philosopher that supports the philosophy of existentialism. Existentialism is a twentieth century philosophy that denies any crucial
human nature and embraces that each of us produces our own essence through our free actions. Existentialists like Sartre believe there isn't a God that
determines people's nature. So, existentialists believe that humans have no purpose or nature except the ones that they create for themselves. We are
free and responsible for what we are and our engagements; even though we are mindful that this can cause agony.
Sartre is one of the constructors of the philosophy of existence that is existentialism. Humans must first be born and exist before they are able to define
their essence. He ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are always options and different paths to take in life; it is just a matter of what one is chosen by you to take. I don't believe that there is a
universal human nature that is shared by all humans in the universe. Every person is different based upon the events that occur in their lives and no
everyone can experience the same things and take away the same responsibilities. The actions people take are based off of how they choose to create
meaning is what makes them the kind of person they are. Even if put in a challenging situation people still are responsible for the decisions made. If
you have to choose between things you still are able to choose which makes you responsible. The person you become is not everything that has
happened to you, but it is everything that has happened and how you choose to act on it.
There are many objections to Sartre's ideas that we are completely free. The question of if our environment, our bodies, and what we are capable of
is already determined then how are we completely free? What is freedom is there are already determined? Even though these things in our lives
may already be determined, we are more than these things because we create who we are based off of what we make of ourselves. We find
ourselves and who we are by experiences, which make us our own individual. Even though some things are already determined for us, we can do with
them, as we like. We are free to make of ourselves whatever we would like, they

Jean-Paul Sartre Essay
Jean–Paul Sartre
Jean–Paul Sartre was an existentialist philosopher. The questions of his philosophy often come out in his readings. Existentialism questions why we
exist.
Existentialists deny the existence of God. Existentialist writers such as Kafka and
Sartre often use prisons and solitary confinement to tell their stories. Often, neither the reader nor the protagonist is aware of what crime has been
committed.
Jean–Paul Sartre's "The Wall" reflects his philosophy and personal experiences.
He worked for the French resistance and was imprisoned by the Germans during
WWII. The story takes place during the Spanish Civil War in an old hospital being used by the Spanish Fascist's to house prisoners. "The Wall" is told
from a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The terror increases as they wait for dawn and the firing squad and Pablo begins to question what happens after death. "I thought of bullets, I
imagined their burning hail through my body. All that was beside the real question; but I was calm: we had all night to understand" (14). Pablo is
denying his own fear. Existentialists do not believe in a Supreme Being, so what is there to be afraid of? But his continual denial of the feeling of
terror demonstrates he does have some fears, "I felt myself crushed under an enormous weight. It was not the thought of death, or fear; it was nameless.
My cheeks burned and my head ached"
(15). Eventually, Pablo recognizes his terror, when he realizes, in spit of it being quite cold, he is sweating profusely. The doctor who is sent to
observe them is chilled and it is the doctors stare that causes Pablo to think of how terrified he actually is,
I saw my shirt was damp and sticking to my skin. I had been dripping for an hour and hadn't felt it. But that swine of a Belgian hadn't missed a thing;
he had seen the drops rolling down my cheeks and thought: this is the manifestation of terror; and he had felt normal and proud of being alive because
he was cold. (17)
His terror manifests when he notices his trousers and buttocks are soaked and he wonders if he pissed his pants like Tom. The terror Pablo and Tom try
to question

Jean Paul Sartre´S Existential Philosophy Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Pawpaw Tran

More from Pawpaw Tran (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Jean Paul Sartre´S Existential Philosophy Essay