The Pros And Cons Of Contract Contracts

The Pros And Cons Of Contract Contracts
Formed contracts usually consist exclusion or exemption clauses limiting the liability of
party/parties for contractual breach. These clauses aim at excluding the legal responsibilities of the
parties for particular types of injuries, losses/damages sustained by the other party. However, the
courts had made distinction between exclusion and limitation clauses limiting the amount of
compensation for contractual breaches. Traditionally, the courts do not assess the exclusion clauses
on merit grounds, to avoid contradicting the general idea of 'freedom of contract'. Hence the courts,
in order to supervise and for better use of these clauses; developed common law rules addressing
incorporation and construction. Additionally, the governmental developed statutory regulations,
Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977 dealing with business to business and consumer to
consumer contracts ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, if the clause is put forward after the contract, then it cannot be incorporated as seen in the
cases of Olley v Marlbourough Court Hotel; and Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking. Incorporation can
also be done by a course of previous dealings as the parties are fully aware of the terms and clauses
that could form the part of the contract. Regularity and consistency in dealings is crucial, evident in
the cases of McCutcheon v MacBrayne; and Hollier v Rambler Motors; where exclusion clause
could not be incorporated due to a non–consistent course of conduct. In cases of onerous or unusual
clauses, more efforts must be made to draw the attention of the party. Considering present case facts
closely, it is established that the exclusion clause was incorporated into the contract through
previous dealings as Jacob and Georgina has a business history and thus proving Georgina's prior
knowledge of the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Different Types Of Contracts And Contracts
There are many different types of contracts and many different parts to a contract. Contracts are
formal agreements between people or businesses. There are seven elements to a contract. The first is
the offer which is the purposed deal. Next is the acceptance of the offer than consideration or
bargaining of the offer. Legality is the next which means is the contract for a lawful purpose. Next is
capacity are the parties adults of sound mind then consent of the contract. Lastly, writing some types
of contracts must be in writing to be enforceable. There are two contract rules for governing the
sales of goods and the sale of services. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is the code used for
the sales of goods. The sales of services uses common law to govern these contracts. UCC was first
published in 1952, the drafters of this code wanted to facilitate the easy information and
enforcement of contracts in a fast– paced world. There are nine articles to the uniform commercial
codes. Article one deals with the law of contracts and article nine deals with payment in security
interest agreements. The most important article is article two which deals with the sale of goods.
Goods are anything movable, except for money, securities and certain legal rights. Article two also
states the rules for contract formation such as the firm offers, shipments of goods and modification
of terms. Article two states the rule for contract repudiation and breach listing several

Contract Law
Contract A contract is a promise between two or more persons involving the exchange of some good
or service. Some of the basic elements of a contract include: an offer and an acceptance; "capacity,"
or being of legal age and sound competence; "mutual assent," or agreement on the terms of a
contract; and
"consideration," or compensation for goods or services rendered. The element that distinguishes a
contract from an informal agreements is that it is legally binding:the law provides a remedy in the
event that the promise is not fulfilled. Bylaw, certain types of contracts must be in writing, but oral
contracts are valid in many situations. An oral contract may be held to exist even in the absence of
agreement as to all ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Legally binding contracts can, and often are, oral in nature. Oral contracts can be enforceable by US
courts. Contracts are reduced to writing and signed by parties to the contract largely to provide
objective proof that a contractual relationship exists, and to provide written guidance as to the terms
and conditions thereof. Without written documentation that shows a contractual relationship exists,
it can be quite difficult and time consuming to prove the terms of a contract in a dispute and can
include protracted litigation. In basic terms, a common law contract is not a promise to complete (or
refrain from completing) an action. First of all, we do not have the Turkish equivalent of the
American Statute of Frauds under Turkish Laws, since judiciary systems are quite different in
Turkey and USA. In Turkey, we have Civil Law system, where codes make the law, whereas in
USA, you have Common Law system, where the legislations are made by the court precedents. That
is why, we may not be able to find exactly compare between two law system. Finally if we take a
look at those two contract law systems ,there is a big difference about the judiciary systems . I think
the USA judiciary system is little bit better than Turkish systmem because Turkish system based on

Contract Essay
Pat was very frustrated because she wanted to purchase a home but lacked the funds or credit to do
so even though Pat was expecting shortly to receive a one–half million dollar final installment
payment for some land she sold several years earlier. Dan knew that Pat was very interested in
purchasing a home and approached Pat with a proposal to assist Pat in buying a home. Dan told Pat
that he would help Pat with the financing. After finding the home she wanted to buy for $250,000,
Dan and Pat orally agreed that Dan would purchase the home and "when you come up with the
money, I (Dan) will sell it to you (Pat) for $250,000 plus a fair commission to be determined." Dan
purchased the home identified by Pat and the following week Pat moved ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Most contracts are valid despite the fact that they may be only oral. Dan was knowledgeable that Pat
wanted to buy a home, which she was not financially qualified to purchase. Consequently, he
offered to purchase the home and sell it to her, when she had the capital to do so. The statement of
Don to Pat, "When you come up with the money, I will sell the home to you for $250,000, plus a fair
commission to be determined", and Pat's search and identification of a suitable home, and Dan's
purchase supports each intent to be bound. In this case, the next week, Pat moved into the house,
begins living in it, and made substantial improvements. The improvement consisted of installing
new carpets, window coverings, and a patio cover. The improvements, spanning a period of six (6)
months, amounted to a cost of $8,000. With respect to a contract, Dan might argue that there was not
a contract, or that the contract was outside the Statue of Frauds. However, any arguments to nullify
the Statue of Frauds are not likely to be successful. In most instances courts attempt to find evidence
that this defense is not supportable. Performance is more relevant in this case. A contract for the sale
of real property will be enforceable if the buyer has taken possession and has made permanent
improvements upon it. Of course, the extent of the improvements required for enforcement varies
from jurisdiction

Contract Law And Sale Of A Valid Contract
Contract Law This scenario raises the question of whether Pierre has entered into a valid contract
with any of the Parties outlined below, where there must be: (i) an agreement which is created by a
valid offer and a matching acceptance; (ii) an intention to create legal relations; and (iii) a set of
promises which are supported by consideration. If all of these exist, Pierre would be in breach of his
contract, as a consequence of selling the car to Marya. Natasha The first issue for Pierre is whether
Natasha can claim that the advertisement is a valid offer to accept or whether the advertisement is
merely an invitation to treat. According to Trietel, "an offer for sale is an expression of willingness
to contract on specific terms made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is
accepted" . In contrast, where there is evidence that Pierre merely intends to start negotiations, by
showing a willingness of inviting offers from other people, he is said to have made an invitation to
treat. For instance, in the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council it was held that the words "may
be willing to sell" constituted an invitation to treat, since they only demonstrated a willingness to
begin negotiations and did not display any contractual intent to be bound. Advertisements are
generally invitations to treat and not offers for sale. Thus, in the case of Partridge v Crittenden it was
held that an advertisement that was placed in the newspaper selling

Contract Law
"The parties to an executory contract are often faced, in the course of carrying it out, with a turn of
events which they did not at all anticipate – a wholly abnormal rise or fall in prices, a sudden
depreciation of currency, an unexpected obstacle to the execution, or the like. Yet this does not in
itself affect the bargain which they have made..." (per Lord Simon in British Movietonews Ltd. v.
London and District Cinemas [1952] A.C. 166 at 185). Discuss this dictum and explain the respects
in which it needs to be qualified. This quote refers to the doctrine of frustration. In order to adhere to
the essay question, it is important to establish what frustration is. The essence of frustration was
identified in Davis Contractors Ltd v ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the last phrase of this dictum , Lord Simon concluded that although exceptional circumstances
may exist, courts must take cautious steps when walking through the door of interpretation and they
must never turn their backs on the terms contained in contracts. To Invalidate a contract may carry a
greater legal consequence than initially foreseen by the courts. A question to raise is; what if a party
to the contract anticipated a future turn of event but assessed the risk involved and notwithstanding,
entered into the contract. Should the court step in to cut the tight rope from such a person's neck
when he or she is facing the guillotine? The role of the courts is to seek justice and not to bail us out
when things are not going our way. For now, there are certain events that can amount to frustration
and the courts can fall back to these precedents to make an informed decision. These events include
physical impossibility, non–occurrence of a particular event, supervening illegality, death or
incapacity for personal service, requisitioning of ships and interferences with chaterparties, sale and
carriage of goods, building contracts, change in the law and performance of only one party affected.
Only few of these will be discussed further. Physical impossibility is concerned with where the
performance of the

Contracts Outline
Nd Contracts Outline Professor Murray 1. Contract Remedies (Chapter One) What is a contract?–
promise or set of promises, for breach of which the law gives a remedy or the performance of which
the law recognizes as a duty. Types of contracts– a. express: formed by language, oral or written b.
implied: formed by manifestations of assent other than oral or written language; by conduct. c.
quasi: not contracts at all, construed by courts to avoid unjust enrichment, by permitting plaintiff to
bring an action in restitution to recover the amount of the benefit conferred on defendant. Critical
Elements of a Contract: a. promise– undertaking or commitment that something shall or shall not be
done b. exchange–something the law ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
intention to be legally bound AND 2. courts have sufficient basis to afford remedy UCC will use
'gap fillers' o §2–305– can insert price o §2–308– absence of delivery time o §2–307– shipment
terms ANATOMY–OFFER & ACCEPTANCE A. Preliminary Negotiations v. Offers A contract
includes not only what the parties said but also what is necessarily to be implied from what they
said. Any conduct of one party, from which the other may reasonably draw the inference of a
promise, is effective in law as such. RULE: When deciding if an offer has been made you look at: 1.
Language used (words of promise, undertaking, or commitment) 2. Determination of the party(ies)
to whom the purported offer has been addressed (less like an offer with indefinite group). 3. The
definiteness of the proposal itself RULE: If a proposal is nothing more than an invitation to the
person to whom it is made to make an offer to the proposer, it is not such an offer as can be turned
into an agreement by acceptance; it is merely an invitation to trade. 1. They ask for offers which the
proposer has a right to accept or reject as he pleases. ADVERTISMENTS Generally ads are not
offers but merely an invitation to offers RULE: Advertisements are usually not an offer but it can be
when two elements are satisfied... a. A definite offeree b.

Contract Length Is A Contract
A contract is a legal document that tend to create an extended relationship between a buyer and
seller of an output, in which they specifically tend to restrict the buyer and seller to exchange at
terms indicated in a legal document. Also, contracts are also another way to purchase inputs.
Moreover, contract length is mainly depends on the output where it may be short, or lengthy and
complicated. Also, contracts clearly need to state the set of tasks that each contracting party expects
the other to perform. Along with specifying the set of tasks, they also have stated some of the
solutions to the problems in the event where if the buyer or the seller are not able to perform the
tasks or able to fulfill its requirement properly. In ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A complete contract has each buyer and seller responsibilities and rights for each and every
likelihood that could possibly happen during the agreement as they are very hard and impractical
hypothesis that can take place during those time. One of these disadvantages of these contracts can
be that satisfies all the needs for both the buyer and seller might be time–consuming and costly to
write, and often legal fees, which could be drawn up a contract that requires exact commitments of
both the buyer and the seller. Also, it is very difficult for any contract to cover everything that could
possibly show up in the future. Hence, in multifaceted contracting surroundings, contracts will
essentially be incomplete, since incomplete contract does not require to have every little description
about the requirements and responsibilities of the parties. Most incomplete contract occur because
complete contract requires a lot of time and money to finish it. On the contrary, vertical integration
is a situation where a firm manufacture their own inputs that are required to make their final
product. In addition, a firm is a bigger organization where they have to produce its own output and
the inputs in order to produce the output. In a vertical integration there

Contract Law : Contract Laws
Elizabeth Richardson Professor Harris Business Law April 29, 2015 Contract Law Contracts are in
every aspect of life. From buying a car to being employed, contracts govern all areas of life. By
definition, a contract is "an agreement creating obligations enforceable by law" (Cornell University
Law School). "A contract in its most basic definition is nothing more than a legally enforceable
promise" (National Paralegal College). That means that any contract that is made legally, which will
be discussed later, will hold up in a court of law. The two different parties that join together to form
an agreement have to do their part of the contract as it is stated within. Contract law is in place to
assure that this happens in the time frame agreed upon while making the contract. "Contracts that
were mutually entered into between parties with the capacity to contract are binding obligations and
may not be set aside due to the caprice of one party or the other unless a statute provides to the
contrary" (Burton). The courts have a very important job when dealing with cases that concern
contracts. If the courts did not enforce contracts, businesses could not function properly. Contract
law prohibits parties from backing out of their agreements without consequences. This assures that
when a party joins into a contract, he/she will receive the service or good that they desire. While
courts have to uphold the law on contract, they cannot make contracts that were not previously
agreed

Contract Disputes
Contract Disputes Vanessa Bray Lee Strayer University BUS501–044 December 9, 2011 Dr.
William Hadyn Roberts "CONTRACT DISPUTES REACH 15–YEAR HIGH", was the heading of
an article published, December 1, 2010 in the Government Executive. The heading in itself tells us
that the government is doing more and more business by contract and as a result contractors who are
lobbying for government business have become more aware of their rights to file disputes when it
involves a loss of potential business. Because of this increase in disputes, the government must have
a method of terminating contracts without suffering the financial liabilities that could result in
millions and millions of dollars going to incomplete contracts and rebids ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The decision in these case states, that Dispute procedures not contract Bid Protest procedures should
have been utilized. The Bid protest procedures provides guidelines and regulatory requirements for
the award or proposed award of a contract by the Federal Government, and ensures compliance with
all statutory, regulatory and legal guidelines of the FAR. The claim filed by Hester deals with a
dispute for the modification of the terms of contract number F34650–81–C–0158 with the
contracting agency. According to the FAR, the Office of the Comptroller of the United States does
not have authority in regards to mediation between contracting agency and contractor to resolve
disputes which occur under a contract. An example is recorded under ASBCA No. 20891, 77–2
B.C.A. (CCH) P 12,670 (1977). This case involves R–E, Inc., a contractor under contract to build a
foundation for the installation of a utility pole. The contract provided all plans and specifications
required by the government. R–E insisted that if they used the contract plans and specifications the
installation of the foundation would be inadequate and not able to support the utility pole. The
government insisted that if R–E completed the work according to the specifications in the contract
that the platform would be adequate. R–E used a steel–reinforced foundation, which exceeded both
the government 's specifications and trade practice which was

Contracts For A Contract Agreement Essay
A contract is a promise or a set of promises that one party makes to another and that can be enforced
using law. Contracts are made for commercial bargains. A contract is legally binding. It entails
selling or hire of commodities such as services, goods or land. The major elements required for a
legally binding contract are offer and its acceptance . When one person expresses an offer on
outlined terms to contract and the offeree indicates that they have agreed to the set terms, the
contract becomes legally binding. There is usually no room for negotiations after a contract has been
made. Therefore, an offer that is valid must be in existence. There are requirements for existence of
such a valid offer. This essay assesses the requirements. For an offer to be valid, contracting parties
in a commercial transaction must be having an intention of entering into an agreement that is legally
binding. Therefore, both the offeror and the offeree must be ready to create a relationship that is
legal in manner . This ensures that either parties can sue the other in case they do not adhere to
provisions of the terms in the contract. If the parties are in a commercial relationship that is not
legally binding, then that is not a contract. It may be subject to contract which means that the terms
of the relationship will become legally binding once the parties sign the subsequent contract. When
the interaction is subject to contract, either of the parties is free to exit the negotiations at

The Contract Law Of Contract
Form of law that rules oral and written agreements attendant with exchange of goods and services
money and properties. It includes topics such as the nature of contractual obligation limitation of
actions – freedom of contract – privacy of contract – termination of contract and convers also
agency relationship commercial paper and contract of employment, if you are employed you'll no
doubt have a contract when you buy house insurance or but the house itself there will be a contract
even buying half a dozen eggs or a newspaper from the comer shop will be governed by the law of
contract Contract can be also defined as below Contracts are enforceable promises, or unpaid
agreements that govern economic exchange Free market economy relies ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The parties may settle one term at a time, but their contract turn out to be complete only when they
assent to the final term. An agreement is binding if the partiesconcur with esteem to the
essentialterms and intend the agreement to be binding, even though all of the parts are not definitely
fixed. The capacity of thegoodsare usually indispensable terms of the contract that must be agreed
upon if the contract is to be applied. Offer An offer is a promise to act or renounce from acting
which is made in exchange for a return promise to do the same. Some offers expect not another
promise being returned promise to do the same , Some offers antedate not another promise being
returned in exchange but the performance of an act or forbearance from taking action , for example a
painters offer to paint someone's house for $100 is probably conditioned on the homeowners
promise to pay upon completion while a homeowners offer to someone $100 to have his or her
house painted is probably conditioned upon the painters successfully performing the job , In either
case an offerees power of acceptance is created when the offeror carries a present committed to enter
a contract in certain and definite terms that are connected to the offeree. Offers that are not
disallowed withdrawn or revoked generally continue until the ending of the time period specified by
the offer or if there is no time limit specified until a reasonable time has passed ,

Difference Between Contract And Contract
Contract and agreement are comparable, but there are some decision have to be a compromise with
the parties. Conversely, all agreements are not contracts there are some difference between
agreement and contract. With the statement of Section 2 (h) Contract Act 1950, an agreement apply
with law is a contract. (Law Teacher, 2017) A contract is compulsory with agreement and
relationship with the parties, and a contract is also a promise which is the promise between each
other impose by the law. There are 6 elements of the contract which is offer, acceptance, and
intention to create legal relations, consideration, certainty, and capacity, all this are important to
form a legal contract. Offer is one of the element to form a legal contract, offer must communicate
and accept. According to Section 2(a) of the contracts Act 1950 is an offer "when one person
signifies to another his willingness to do or abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining
the assent of that other to do such act or abstinence. (Law notes, 2017) In the case study of
Chapelton v ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Example of the case study is Simpkins V Pays (1955) Simpkins and her granddaughter and plaintiff
often join the competition in newspaper. But all the prize will be get by Simpkins. When the
competition is victorious, Simpkins is refused to share with plaintiff. So plaintiff sue Simpkins. So
the court carry out the mutual arrangement, it legally–binding agreement to share with plaintiff.
(Law Teacher , 2017) And regarding to business and commercial there is presumption for intention
legal relations. Based on the case study, Rose & Frank Co. Vs Crompton Bros. Ltd. An agreement
between these two companies which is Rose& Frank Co employ by Crompton Bros. Ltd. As an
agent to their companies but the agreement is not legal and formal so is not binding and legally
enforceable. (Shah,

Contract Administrators
George Shepard: Mr. Shepard is listed as the Contract Administrator for Contract ID # JA–FSA–
OD–002–15. During an interview with Mr. Shepard, he identified himself as a Policy Analyst for
DHS FSA. He also serves as a Contract Administrator who supports the various FSA programs. As a
Contract Administrator he is responsible for creating purchase orders for grants, among other tasks.
In the matter of Casa Ruby, he created the purchase order for the grant at the direction of the
Program Manager. The responsibility for managing the grant rests with the program.
Hilary Cairns: Mrs. Carins is listed as the Grant Administrator for Contract ID # JA–FSA–OD–002–
15. On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Investigator Beekman conducted an interview
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
TCP is responsible for issuing and monitoring contracts with provider organizations. They provide
training, oversee and maintain compliance by way of the Homeless Management Information
System (HMIS), conduct investigations, and manage the budgets, finances, and reimbursements.
Mr. Lucio has been employed by TCP since 2011. He is responsible for subcontracting with federal
and local agencies. He supervises training and conducts program monitoring.
During the meeting, Mr. Lucio stated that Ms. Williams had worked at Casa Ruby before they began
receiving any public funding. He has been under the impression that Ms. Williams currently works
with Casa Ruby, but not under the contract that TCP has with Casa Ruby. He believes that Casa
Ruby may have some private funding that is being used to pay Ms. Williams to continue working
with the organization. Mr. Lucio mentioned that there may have been an issue with Ms. Williams'
background check which came back with a previous prostitution charge. However, management at
Casa Ruby believed the Ms. Williams past should be overlooked in that she had turned her life
around and could be a positive role model for youth. Therefore, it was the organizations decision to
maintain Ms. Williams employment status with Casa Ruby because they wanted to utilize her to
speak to clients

Types of Contract
1. Voidable Contract: An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the
parties thereto, but not at the option of the other or others, is a voidable contract. A contract is
voidable when one of the parties to the contract has not exercised his free consent. One of the
essential elements of a formation of a contract for example, free consent, is absent. All voidable
contracts are those which are induced by coercion fraud or misrepresentation. The person whose
consent is not freely given may avoid a contract. It therefore continues to be valid till the party
whose consent is caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation choose to avoid
the contract within a reasonable time. Contract then is not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
All contracts which are not under seal are simple contracts. All simple contracts require
consideration. They may be made by written or spoken words. Contracts of Record and Specialty
Contracts are also known as Formal Contracts. The classification of contracts into Contracts of
Record, Specialty and simple is under the English Law. Indian Law does not recognize contracts
without consideration. All contracts must have consideration in order the valid subject to exceptions
under section 25 of the Act. 13. Statutory Contract: When all or some of the terms and conditions of
contract are statutory then the entire contract, or that extent as the case may be, would be regarded
as statutory contract. "Legally binding" redirects here. For other uses, see wiktionary:legally
binding. For other uses, see Contract (disambiguation). A contract is a legally enforceable agreement
between two or more parties with mutual obligations. The remedy at law for breach of contract is
"damages" or monetary compensation. In equity, the remedy can be specific performance of the
contract or an injunction. Both remedies award the damaged party the "benefit of the bargain" or
expectation damages, which are greater than mere reliance damages, as in promissory estoppel.
|Contents | |

Law of Contract
contract but do not appear to be a relevant issue here. While it is possible for offers to be "made to
the world"1, K 's advertisement is an "invitation to treat"2. It cannot be construed as an offer as it
shows no intention on K 's part to be bound to its terms, in contrast to the wording of the
advertisement in Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ba// Co3. Thus A 's letter to K dated 21 April is the first
possibility of an offer. However the terms of this letter are too vague to be construed as an offer.
This is because an offer must contain all the terms necessary for the contract to come into
existence4. Offering to work for a fee "between $12000–$20000" is not certain enough to constitute
an offer and the letter is more appropriately ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thus consideration passes from both parties16 and is of a precise 7 Ibid 8 Felthouse v Bindley
(1862) 11 CB (NS) 869 9 R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227 10 Eg Entores LTD v Far Eastern Corp
(19550 All ER 493 & 495 11 Manchester Diocesian Council for Education v Commercial and
General Investments Ltd [1969] 3 All ER 1593 12 Eliason v Henshaw 4 Wheaton 225 (1819) 13
Adams v Linsell (1818) 2 B & Ald 681 14 (1887) 2 AC 666 15 (1988) 14 NSWLR 523 16 Dunlop
Pneumatic Tyre Co v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1915] AC 847 nature17. The fact that this conduct occurs
in a business setting between two parties acting at arms length also creates a presumption that there
is a common intention to create legal relations, a presumption that is not rebutted by any contrary
facts18. The Terms of the Contract In order to determine the terms of the contract it is important to
have regard to the terms of the offer only. The only terms that could arise out of the previous
negotiations are those referred to in the offer itself or that the courts would imply as necessary to
give the contract "business efficacy"19. This is particularly the case if the signed contract is seen as
the basis of the agreement, which is likely. In this case the parol evidence rule will generally
preclude any evidence of intention inconsistent with the signed document20. There is nothing in the
offer letter or contract sent by K to A which imports any of the previous negotiations. Thus once the
offer is

Contract Law
Contract is an agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and
accepted, and each party benefits. No contract can come into being unless the following features
exist: an actual offer, an acceptance, consideration (this means that each party will contribute
something of a material value to the bargain) and an intention to create legal relations. The
agreement can be formal, informal, written, or just plain understood. (a) For a contract to exist the
offer must be made and then accepted. An offer may be defined as a statement of the terms put
forward as the basis of the bargain which carries with it a promise, express or implied, to adhere to
the terms. A legally binding offer will include clearly stated ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Counter–offer has an effect of canceling the original offer and so the original offeror can decide
whether to sell it to somebody else at the price he has stated and the terms of the original offer. To
conclude it can be stated that Bernard's letter was not a mere enquiry of negotiation, but a counter–
offer, which Anton didn't accept. Therefore there was no contract between Anton and Bernard and
Anton was free to sell the boat to Celine. However from the other point of view, it can be argued
that Bernard's phrase that he is willing to accept Anton's offer identifies that he is just asking some
further information and tests out whether further negotiation with Anton is possible. This means that
the original offer was not destroyed, but due to the fact that his reply was vague it can be considered
not enforceable, as offerees should explain them clearly as well as the offerors. Therefore no
contract took place in this situation. (b) In this scenario Bernard replied by return of post, and
accepted Anton's original offer. Usually, communication is effective only when it reaches the offeror
or the offeror's place of business. However, Postal rule is a well–known legal principle in contract
law. The postal rule of acceptance of an offer became entrenched in the common law of contact in
the English courts and therefore in the Australia courts during the nineteenth century. And the postal
rule is an exception to the general rules of contract law in common

The Terms Of A Contract
The terms of a contract refer to the obligations of the parties entering into the contract. These terms
are the contents of the contract, which determine the parties' rights and obligations. Consequently,
the law classifies the terms in two ways. Firstly, the law can look at the terms according to the
consequences of breach involving the nature of each term as a condition, warranty or innominate.
Secondly, they may investigate the method through which the terms got into the contract, explicitly
or implicitly. Courts have the option to examine these two methods to reach an understanding of the
obligations of each party in the contract breached by one party. In reference to the first method, this
essay will focus on the ability of implicit terms to enter into a contract. An implicit term is not
expressly agreed to by the parties, but nevertheless are either read into the contract or arise from
other sources of law. To clarify, parties may not have expressly included the term due to
forgetfulness, previous contract with the party or because it may have been obvious due to the
parties presence in the same trade. If the parties do not include a term, the court can imply a term for
business efficacy. This is done in order to make a contract work. Accordingly, the court aims to
make valid the intention of the parties. The Moorcock (1889) involved a term not included, but of
such an obvious nature that the parties did not think to include it in the contractual terms.
Subsequently,

Contract
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Basic Elements of Contract In order to form a valid contract, each agreement
must fulfill some important elements which are stated in Section 10 (1) of Contract Act 1950, "All
agreements are contract if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a
lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void." This section emphasizes the legal
contract, the willingness and the parties capable of contracting and consideration which are all part
of the basic elements of a contract. The following are the basics elements of the contract, a) Offer b)
Acceptance c) Consideration d) Ability to Contract e) Intention to Create Legal Relations f)
Certainty g) Free ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In other words, the written contract is considered safe because there is evidence that can be referred
if there is any problem arised. 2.0 Offer The definition of an offer is an expression of willingness to
contract on certain terms, made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is
accepted by the person to whom it is addressed by virtue of Section 2 (a) and Section (b) of
Contracts Act 1950.An agreement must happen between two or more parties when there is
expression of willingness to enter into a contract and when it made with a legal intention that it shall
be binding and legally enforceable by law. Section 2(c) of the Contract Act 1950 states that the
person making the offer/proposal is the offeror, while the person accepting the offer/proposal is the
offeree. Section 2 (a) of the Contracts Act 1950 states, "When one person signifies to another his
willingness to door to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other
to the act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal" Section 2(b) of the Contracts Act 1950 states,
"When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to
be accepted; a proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise" Section 2(c) of the Contracts Act 1950
states, "Person making the

A Contract Of Employment Contract
A contract of employment is a type of a contract used in labor law to attribute rights and
responsibilities between parties to a contract (Blum, 2007). On the one end stands an "employee"
who is "employed" by an "employer". A written employment contract is a document that someone
and their employee sign which sets forth the terms and conditions of the employment relationship
(Tepper, 2011). Many rules, exceptions and considerations apply when dealing with employment
contracts. Suppose that the Fabulous Hotel hires you as head chef under a two–year employment
contract. After two years, another hotel wants to hire you. However, in the original employment
contract you signed with the fabulous Hotel, the following paragraph appears: "The below–signed
agrees not to work as a chef for another hotel in the same metropolitan area for a period of two years
after leaving our employ." First, it is crucial to know and understand which law governs the
employment contract. According to Seaquist, contract law is governed by the common law or the
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (Seaquist, 2012). If the contract handles the sales of goods, it is
governed by the UCC (Seaquist, 2012). If the contract handles anything besides the sale of goods
(such as real estate, insurance, personal services like employment, etc.) then it is governed by the
common law (Seaquist, 2012). When a business or employer hires an employee to join the staff, the
employee enters into a contract that is governed by the

The Case Of A Contract
Page 180 1) The court viewed the situation as if a reasonable individual would consider the offer as
valid. Zehmer's outward expressions and words constituted a genuine offer to sell. The outwardly
demonstrated intent is all the court looks at, not the secret and inward thought of the defendant. A
contract cannot be done in passing or when absent–minded. Both parts have to come to mutual
understanding and agreement (Melvin, 2011). Lucy demonstrated her intent by ensuring that details
were in the contract (illustrated by several drafts that were written), and by ensuring both husband
and wife signed the contract (Lucy v. Zehmer–Case Brief Summary, 2015). 2) Had Zehmer realized
that Lucy took his offer seriously, he would have informed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Another point is that after a month and a fax requesting the written document, Chou answered
immediately and demonstrated that BTT was interested in a written contract. BTT had the contract
in their possession for several months to accept or reject, and did not. 2) The facts that would weigh
for Chou would be that both parties accepted the terms and continued operating as if there were a
contract. Second would be the fact that upon notification of further contract, Chou prepared and
delivered it immediately. It was BTT that deferred the signing without rejecting the contract for
several months. 3) The mail rule and their communication by faster email reveal that they both had
many opportunities within any given period to make adjustments, counter offers, or even reject the
deal without it going on for such a long period (Melvin, 2011). 4) Chou's neglect to follow through
with a contract could make the deal unenforceable. The statute of frauds requires some information
to be written down and signed. If the courts did not take the email that spells out all the terms of the
agreement sent by BTT to Chou as proof of all parties' agreement, it could be a dismissed lawsuit
(Melvin, 2011). 5) BTT could avoid the contact under a doctrine of mistake. However, it would be
under the mutual mistake. The mistake that Chou

Contract Management
Contract Risk and Opportunities
Richard S. Stainback Jr.
LAW/531
June 27, 2011
Ben Waggoner
Contract Risk and Opportunities
Clarity of contract is an essential element to creating a workable and executable agreement. C–S and
Span entered into a business contract that was ambiguous from the start. It used words like
"ordinary" in terms of production. Terms like this are often up to interpretation and can be the failing
point of an agreement.
Legal Issues Present
Breach of Contract under "Internal Escalation Procedure for Dispute"– C–S has failed to follow the
agreed upon dispute resolution process in regards to the delays and quality concerns. C–S has
tentatively threatened to terminate the contract in light of product delays ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Management Responsibility (Span) – Span should revisit internal processes to see if there is a
process that is slowing delivery of products to C–S. After the internal audit of processes the project
management team should reach out to C–S and ask the same be done to ensure there are not any
procedural delays present.
Management Responsibility (C–S) – They should also internally audit there processes in regards to
this project to ensure that the new management is onboard and understands the particulars of their
responsibility to this project.
Breach of Contract under substantial performance of contract– This measure allows for neither party
to rescind the contract past 50% completion. While at the 60% point in the contract, Span has only
delivered on 40% of its responsibility to C–S. It is understood that the delays are caused in part by
both companies. This point is not a valid defense for Span and should be avoided in communication
with C–S.
Management Responsibility (Span) – Span needs to assign more manpower to this project to keep
with the timeline.
Management Responsibility (C–S) – C–S needs to express the concerns more effectively to Span
and accept some responsibility due to the amount of changes requested.
Dispute Resolution Methods
Arbitration and Mediation– This method could be used by Span and C–S to resolve the contract
dispute. It is less costly than traditional litigation. However this method does not

Psychological Contract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the report is to discuss the theory of psychological
contracts in organizational employment and to see its evolution by discussing various theories of
different authors, its present form, issues related to it and its importance in training and
apprenticeship programs. This report basically discusses both the theoretical and practical aspects of
psychological contract. This report shows how that how the concept of psychological contract has
evolved and what different authors have said about this. And sees through what changes
psychological contract has gone through and what shape it has adopted now finally. Psychological
contracts are becoming complex day by day. Its complexity and implications are ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Psychological contract in view of ARGYRIS: One of the first writers to use the term psychological
contract was ARGYRIS in 1960 who defined it as the implicit understanding between a group of
employees and their foreman. He described it as: A relationship may be hypothesized to evolve
between the employees and the foremen which might be called the 'psychological work contract'.
The employee will maintain high production, low grievances etc. if the foreman guarantees and
respects the norms of the employee informal culture (i.e. let the employees alone, make certain they
make adequate wages and have secure jobs). In other words, he was proposing that a relationship
existed that potentially, had a stronger influence on employees' performance and attitudes than the
formal contract of employment. However, Argyris referred to the psychological contract only in
passing, and Levinson et al (1962) claim to have been the 'father ' of the concept. They defined it as
'the unwritten contract, the sum of the mutual expectations between the organization and employee '.
Psychological contract in view of SCHEIN: The early view of the psychological contract, like the
social contract before clearly refers to mutual expectations and obligations. It differs from the social
contract as it specifically relates to the workplace and what the foreman expects of their team and
what team members, in turn, expect from the foreman. The psychological contract was refined by
SCHEIN

Contract Contracts Or Lump -sum Contracts
Contract is a major part in procurement management. Types of contract required for all the relevant
elements related to the project: Fixed – price contracts or lump –sum contracts: Certain amount is
agreed for the goods or service being sold. The buyer and the seller agree on a well defined to be
delivered material for a specific price and time. The contract can include some incentives fee for
meeting or exceeding the project objectives. While purchasing the high cost machinery items like
loader, lifter etc for the production of the product of our venture a contract was done in a fixed–
price with Jason Manufacture and Suppliers Company. He supplied the heavy machinery items in
time and did provide better equipments within the contracted amount. The venture was happy so he
as incentive fee and promised to give him more contracts in the mere future. Cost– Reimbursement
Contracts: Payment is done to the seller for direct or indirect actual cost. This type of contract is
done when the scope of the project is not clear. The risk is absorbed by the buyer as the final cost is
uncertain. If problem arises during the execution of the project, the buyer has to spend more money
than he had estimated. While ordering the machines like computers, wires, CCTV, stationary items,
furniture 's from the Lone distributers and suppliers, the exact amount and the exact quantity were
not estimated. We did a contract. Certain quantities were ordered at first. Later we had to pay more
money

The Rights Of A Contract
For a contract to be created there has to be an offer, acceptance, intention of legal consequence, and
consideration. Capacity comes under the umbrella of contract law. It can be defined as a person's
capability entering in to a legal contract or agreement and be bound by it. Upex (2008) has said 'all
persons have full legal power to enter into any legal contract they wish and thus bind themselves'.
Capacity can be categorized under three headings; Individuals, Corporations and Partnerships. There
are exceptions to the rule of entering a contract which includes minors, people with a mental
illnesses, or who are under the influence of alcohol. These groups of people are seen as having no
capacity, or incapacity. If any of these issues are present at the time they are entering in to the
contract then it can then be seen as unenforceable or will be queried. Under the Family Law Reform
Act 1969 a minor is seen as a person under the age of 18. The main statute which minors are
governed by is the Minors' Contract Act 1987. It states 'a contract made by a minor is not void; and
although the minor is not normally bound, the other party will be.' Minors are seen as having
limitations when entering in to contracts, and therefore there are some immunities to the rule. This
includes necessaries and none necessaires, voidable contracts, or non–binding contracts which have
been ratified. In terms of the necessaries, The Sale of Goods Act 1979 says that 'goods suitable to
the condition

What Is A Contract?
What is a Contract? The official definition of a contract is "a promise or a set of promises for the
breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way
recognizes as a duty." More concisely a contract is an agreement that two parties can enforce in
court. Within the contract, two parties must be aware of all the elements within it for the parties to
make it a valid contract in court. A valid contract could be considered the basis of all types of
contracts. An important factor while considering a contract is the objective theory of the contract.
Objective theory of contract is not the same as the moral obligation of a contract. The objective
theory of contract is merely the parties looking at the intent of the contract and determining that
there is no personal or subjective intent, or belief, of a party. These facts can be interpreted by a
reasonable person, meaning that a sound of mind individual should be able to decide if one of the
parties has comprised the intent of the contract. Objective theory of contract can be considered the
heart of a contract. A deeper understanding of contracts reveals that they have elements and
subcomponents to those elements that need to be considered when parties enter into or draft a
contract. Elements of Contracts The first element of a contract is agreement, which means that both
parties must agree and understand their mutual assent to the same deal. For two parties to have an
agreement, there should

Contract For The Contract Of Contract
A condition is a term that is so essential to the agreement that its violation is considered a substantial
breach of contract performance. A violation of a condition is said to go to the root of the contract. A
guarantee is a contract term that is not so essential. A guarantee must be made, but a violation of it is
not considered to go to the root of the contract. This sense of warranty should not be confused with
other uses of the word such as in "one year maintenance warranty". Damage is the remedy for
breach of warranty. Each contract of sale is likely to contain a number of terms and stipulations on
the nature and quality of the goods and their adequacy of the object of the buyer. All these terms are
not likely to be of equal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Where a seller delivers defective goods, two questions immediately arise: a) What is the precise
legal basis of his liability, b) What rights does the buyer have against him. Although these questions
appear quite simple, the answers to them are difficult enough. The rights and remedies of the buyer
often depend on the classification of the terms. The terms of a contract are the essence of a contract
and indicate what the contract will do. For instance, the price of a good, the time of its promised
delivery and the description of the good will all be terms of the contract. Before entering into a
contract, a series of statements are made by one party in order to encourage or induce the other party
to enter into contract. A dispute may later arise as to which of the statements made should be
considered a part, or a term, of the contract, and which should be taken as merely pre–contract talk,
and therefore, not a part or term of the contract. Parties to a contract are bound only by its terms, not
by any peripheral statements that may have been made prior to or after entering into contract. A
representation which is subsequently made part of the contract ceases to be a representation and
becomes something more, viz., a promise that such a thing is or shall be. The question then arises
whether this representation, which has ceased to be a mere representation, and has become a term of
the contract, is

Construction Contracts : A Formal Contract
2. Part A Construction contracts can be initiated and formed in many ways with the most accepted
and popular method being a standard formal contract such as JCT, NEC, FIDIC, LOGIC etc.
however there is an alternative method which is not as widely accepted which is a 'letter of intent ' It
is normally used to describe a letter from an employer to a contractor indicating the employer 's
intention to enter into a formal written contract for works defined in the letter, and probing the
contractor to commence those works before the formal contract is implemented. This is a risky way
to form a contract as there is no legally binding document tying the employee to the work he has
been asked to carry out, that is why a formal contract such as ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
A letter of intent should be checked regularly, with emphasis on the recording of dates. The best
solution however is to replace with a fully formed contract such as JCT. Fig. 1. Working relationship
between parties involved 3. Part B The clerk of works duty is to act as the architect's eyes and ears
on site, while carrying out a thorough inspection of the day to day progress on site guaranteeing the
work is carried out in accordance with the contract particulars, ensuring that the level of
workmanship on site is maintained and also that the materials being used are of the highest possible
standard attainable, however he does not possess the right to issue any instruction to the contractor
as he is on site only in an inspection capacity and if he does issue an instruction then under clause
3.4 of JCT 2011 (SBC/Q) any instructions/directions given to the contractor by the clerk of works
shall have no effect unless the Architect/Contract Administrator has power to alter that part of the
project and then confirmed the instruction in writing within two days of it being given. Therefore
any instruction/direction given then confirmed shall from the date of issue be classed as direction
given by the Architect/Contract Administrator not the clerk of works. fig.1.1 – Process for carrying
out Instructions So the contractor should not have carried out the work described in the direction
until written

What Contract Law Is Concerned With A Contract
Formative Assessment Essentially, what contract law is concerned with is whether there is a contract
in the first place. A contract is formed when there is a meeting of minds. There needs to be an offer
and an acceptance , with the mirror principle applied– one must mirror the other precisely ,
otherwise there is no contract. It is also important to be able to determine between offers and
invitation to treat. Offer and acceptance need to be communicated, and with offer, there needs to be
an intention to create legal relations. When dealing with the case we were presented with to advise
Francis, we must firstly determine where there is a valid contract. We are determining which party
has a contract and is in breach of it with Harry. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the postal rule only applies to acceptance, hence, Harry would not be able to claim Francis
is in breach of contract. The risk of the postal rule falls on the offer. Another way how Harry might
want to use the postal rule for his benefit would be to argue his invitation to treat was an offer, and
the letter Francis posted was an acceptance. If in fact this was the case, which, as discussed is not,
the postal rule would apply, if the acceptance mirrored the offer. However, if we tried to use this,
somewhat fallacious reasoning, there is still no contract. If Harrry's reply was an offer, than when
Francis replied with a lower demand, it cannot be regarded as acceptance, as it does not mirror the
offer. This would be a counter–offer , which will be discussed in greater detail later on. Back to the
postal rule, it would not apply and Harry again does not have a case. This is because the offer and
acceptance don't mirror each other, as he attempted to deliver 20 cases instead of 15, but as was
discussed, Harry would not have a strong case, if he tried to claim his invitation to treat was an offer.
Now we could proceed in clarifying Francis the contractual relationship Harry has with Indra. There
is a contract– it is clearly stated that Harry accepts an offer from Indra to supply all the cases he has,
and at what price. The offer and acceptance are communicated and mirror

Business Contract ( The Contract )
This Business Contract (the "Contract") is made effective on the [Date Ordinal Number] day of
[Month], [Year], by and between [Name 1] of [Address 1 including City, State, and Zip Code] and
[Name 2] of [Address 2 including City, State, and Zip Code]. These parties have willingly agreed to
enter into this Contract for the purposes set forth and made part of this Contract, on the following
terms and conditions:
Purpose of the Contract
1. [Name 1] agrees to [sell goods specified/sell business specified/complete work specified]. [Name
2] agrees to [purchase goods specified/purchase business specified/receive completed work] from
[Name 1].
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE
[Name of product/business/work] [Quantity of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Payment
7. [Name 1] will provide an itemized invoice for [Name 2] within [Number] days of delivering or
transferring the [products/business/work].
8. [Name 2] shall make payment to [Name 1] in the amount of [Sum Total] within [Number] days
from the receipt and acceptance of the invoice for [Goods/Business/Work].
9. A payment discount of [Percentage] percent applies of payment is made within [Number] days of
invoice being received.
10. Payments to [Name 1] will be made in full as agreed, without any deductions for taxes.
11. If [Name 2] does not provide payment within the number of days specified, interest of
[Percentage] percent per year, or the maximum amount allowable by law, is added to and payable on
the overdue amount, whichever is less. [Name 2] will pay all collection costs, including without
limitation, reasonable attorney fees.
12. In addition to any other right or remedy provided by law, if [Name 2] fails to provide payment,
[Name 1] may consider this a material breach of the Contract. [Name 1] can cancel this Contract
and/or seek legal remedies.

Intellectual Property
13. The business retains ownership of any data, information, or intellectual property disclosed in
connection with this Agreement. This intellectual property may be used by either party in
accordance with the license terms:
a. Intellectual property can be used in connection with the services, for the purpose for which
products were originally purchased
b.

The Formation Of A Contract
A contract is an agreement between people or legal entities (such as corporations) in which one
party agrees to perform a service or provide goods in exchange for the payment of money or other
goods or services. A binding, legally enforceable contract can be in writing or oral. The formation of
a contract is accomplished when there is an offer and acceptance between the contracting parties of
the exchange of "consideration, something of value. This offer and acceptance are occasionally
referred to as a "meeting of the minds." If the parties have not reached a meeting of the minds, then
there is no agreement. Like any other contract, the primary features for the creation of a marriage
contract are offer and acceptance. When Victoria ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By giving a ring as promise ring, inviting Emily to Florida any by Emily accepting the ring, both
Victoria and Emily entered into a bilateral contract. – 0% Issues One key issue for this case is
"Breach of Contract". By giving the engagement ring and promising to Emily a better life in Florida,
and asking her to move to Florida and Emily accepts the ring, a Bilateral contract was created. When
Victoria went back on her promise she breached the contract. Also by not mentioning to Emily that
she was still married is a clear act of fraud by Victoria. "Breach of Contract" Both unilateral and
bilateral agreements are enforceable in the courts. The agreements change the status of the parties to
it. The reverse is possible too. Breach of contract can occur due to many reasons. With the bilateral
agreement, both the parties will suffer if the agreement is not fulfilled. It is more of a symbiotic
relationship. A breach of engagement to marry is a cause of action in some jurisdiction. Some states
have taken the exemption to this. Florida is one of these states. Victoria's promise to marry Emily is
treated as a legally binding contract. When a breach is committed to such promise, an action will lie
for damages. An action for breach of a promise to marry is predicated upon the proposition that
Victoria has breached an existing valid contract to marry. A breach of a

Contract Law
General Introduction For parties to be bound by an agreement, it must first be determined if a prima
facie valid and enforceable contract exists. A contract can be defined as an agreement containing
promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and
obligations and enforceable in a court of law [1]. For a legally binding contract to exist the
following elements must be satisfied: 1. An offer must exist 2. The offer must be accepted 3.
Consideration must pass between the parties 4. The parties must intend the agreement to be legally
binding 5. The parties must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract 6. The contract cannot be
for an illegal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In applying this case, the offer made by Boris would terminate the original offer. Therefore,
Michael's response constitutes a counter–offer not an invitation to treat. Another matter for legal
consideration is whether Boris accepted the counter– offer and if the method of acceptance was
legally binding. An acceptance converts the promise of the offeror into an agreement[6]. The
acceptance by Boris to Michael's counter–offer contained two key elements: ← A willingness to
take what was exactly offered (i.e. the sale of the car); and ← An agreement to pay the price
required (i.e. $800). The facts presented clearly indicate upon receipt of Michael's letter, Boris
accepted the offer and promptly replied by post creating a simple, bilateral contract – 'a promise for
a promise'. The exchange of such promises creates an enforceable contract. In contract law, the
offeror can establish the method of acceptance and the acceptance must comply with the
requirements in the offer before an agreement is completed. The facts provided indicate, Michael as
offeror, failed to prescribe any method of acceptance. There is an assumption that if no method of
acceptance is prescribed, acceptance is to take the same form as the offer[7]. Given Boris replied by
the method of offer, being post, it can be concluded that Boris complied with the method of
acceptance by posting the letter of acceptance. Having determined there

Contract Law : The Contract Essay
Contract Law: Contract comes in a distinctive way like shapes & sizes or bond needs to set up by an
individual who is making the agreement and should be recognized by the person who is marking the
agreement and he/she needs to verify that a person who signed the agreement fulfills the conditions.
It can isolate into two sorts, which are lawful or unlawful & oral or reported. In like manner law
legitimate frameworks, an agreement (or casually known as an assertion in a few words) is an
understanding having a legal item gone into intentionally by two or more gatherings, each of whom
expects to make one or more lawful commitments between them. Legitimate opinions are those
assertions, which are marked and stamped whereas unlawful claims are those understandings, which
are not sealed or signed. However, Oral agreements are indeed hazardous because if circumstance
turns out badly then there is no real way to demonstrate it. Along these lines, it 's been exhorted that
it needs to reported so that putting the agreement in report additionally verifies both sides what 's
being guaranteed before they concur because if one gathering breaks the agreement without taking
authorization from the other party can be punished according to contract law. For instance, on the
off chance that you go to a hotel and book yourself a space for a night that ends up being grimy or
something not living up to expectations, it is qualified for being exchanged. It doesn 't have to have
a particular

Contract Formation
Part A Contracts are an integral part of business and everyday life, and are fundamental to
construction as the industry relies on the formation of contracts for business agreements. "Contracts
are based on the idea of a bargain, where each side must put something into the bargain. A contract
may be defined as 'an agreement which is binding on the parties'" (Galbraith, 1998, pg78). There are
a number of key components which must be present in the formation of such contracts. Firstly, there
needs to be an initial offer made by one party for the formation to begin. "An offer exists when one
party effectively declares his readiness to be bound by a set of terms without any further
negotiation" (Galbraith, 1998, pg79). It is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
the amount of pay which could be the same as that paid on a prior occasion". One particular problem
in construction is the 'letter of intent ', widely used between employers and contractors as a form of
pre–contract agreement. Following on from the tendering negotiations, Adriaanse (2010, pg55)
writes "the purpose of a letter of intent is to express an intention to enter into a contract at a future
date". These are the result of failing to negotiate on certain terms in time for the project start date,
and are introduced to allow the commencement of work, keeping within the projects ' completion
target. As these are often not legally binding contracts they cause disputes in the future if one of the
parties does not carry out their duties, as in British Steel Corporation v. Cleveland Bridge &
Engineering Co. Ltd (1981). Owen ( 1998, pg50) writes that "all simple contracts must have
consideration given by each party to the other as the price of each other 's promises. It may take the
form of money, goods, services, promises not to sue etc." For example party A must receive
something from party B, in return for party A providing something to party B. However
McKendrick (2007, pg88) states that "consideration must be sufficient but does not need to be
adequate", meaning for example something must be offered to the other party in return to satisfy the
rules of consideration, but does not need to be of an equal value as

Contract Agreement For A Contract
Everyone will have to sign a contract at some point in their lives whether it is for rental, purchase or
lease. Most will not read the specific details of the contract which could lead to circumstances of
breaching the agreement. This paper will give an example of an apartment lease contract which I,
Ivory Polk have entered into with Chelsea 88 Apartments. I will provide some specific contractual
details within the contract. I will also include the five essential elements of an enforceable contract
and show how it correlates with my contract example. We all should become aware of all the details
within any contract we sign to prevent any possible breaches and to allow ourselves to enter into a
fair and responsible situation. Some of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An offer is a request from one party to another to begin a contractual obligation. An offer also
indicates a desire to be tied in by the agreement with the acceptor. An acceptance is to agree to the
conditions set forth in the contract. The action of acceptance produces the contact. We then need to
have consideration which has to be received as stated in the contract. Consideration is the notion of
legal value which can be in the form of money, services, or items, just to name a few. Furthermore,
we have legality which means all aspects of the contract must be legal. The legality of the contract
must be consistent with the law. According to FindLaw 's State Laws, a website of state–specific
laws, "When someone agrees to rent or lease a property, they sign a lease or rental agreement
outlining the terms of the agreement. It is a legally binding contract between the tenant and the
landlord that details the rights and responsibilities of each party. When either party violates the
terms of a valid rental agreement, then the aggrieved party may seek relief in civil court" (2016,
para. 1). This statement identifies the importance of legality of a contract and specifies possible
remedies. The last element needed for an enforceable contract is capacity. Both parties must have
the legal capacity to be tied into a contract which includes sound mind and age appropriate. It is
important that both parties have the capacity to understand the

Contracts And Contracts Of Contracts
Introduction We enter into contracts every day. Taking a seat in the taxi amounts to entering into a
contract. You go to a bar to drink some beers, you have entered a contract though we might not
realise that we have entered into a contract. In the commercial world services and goods are
normally purchased for resale or consumption. Usually the buyer and the seller will negotiate the
terms of the purchase before they enter a transaction which will result in the sale. Trading involves
financial risk therefore it is in the interest of all to have recognizable set of rules by which each
party agrees and abides to. All business naturally deal with contracts, these contracts can either be
unwritten or written. A contract is a legally binding ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To create a contractual relationship both parties must intend their agreement to have legal
consequences. Cases where parties of the agreement have not clearly expressed their intentions it
will be left to the courts to judge whether they intended to get into a contract. An agreement of a
purely social or domestic nature is not a contract. A good example is the Balfour v. Balfour (1919)
case whereby the husband agreed to pay £30 to his wife every month while he was abroad. As he
failed to pay the promised amount, his wife sued him for the recovery of the amount. The court held
that she could not recover it because it was social agreement and the parties did not intend to create
any legal relations. Nonetheless, even in the case of agreements of purely social or domestic nature,
there may be intention of the parties to create legal obligations. In such cases the social agreement is
intended to have legal consequences which results in a contract. In commercial and business
agreements the law will presume that the parties entering into agreement intend those agreements to
have legal consequences. A contract may be oral or in writing. If a certain type of contract is
required by law to be in writing, it must comply with the necessary formalities as to writing,
registration and attestation. If these legal formalities are not

AIA Contract
In the instant matter, the 2007 settlement agreement reflects an intent to modify the prior AIA
Contract, not to "fully extinguish" it. Or, in the words of Judge Wallace, the 2007 settlement
agreement was merely "a narrowing of the universe of potential claims," (E. 2283), but not an
"extinguishment of the old contract." Leisner, 252 Md. at 564. First, paragraphs nineteen (19) and
twenty–two (22) of the 2007 settlement agreement expressly provide, this agreement shall not
operate to release any claims or rights that Metropolitan may have against WCS and/or its sureties
under any warranty or guarantee or any claims or rights that Metropolitan may have against WCS
and/or its sureties under any warranty or guaranty or any claims or rights that Metropolitan may
have against WCS and/or its surety for latent defects[,] (E. 887 (emphasis ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
at 214, all the rights and obligations of the prior agreement–no "exceptions." (E. 2267, 2269;
Appellant's Brief at p. 21). In this matter, the plain and unambiguous terms of the 2007 agreement–
consistent with National Surety's concessions to this effect–demonstrate that it was not "clearly and
satisfactorily" intended to "fully extinguish[]" "all of the provisions of the earlier contract" so as to
completely "discharge" the prior agreement. I.W. Berman Props., 276 Md. at 8; Clark, 286 Md. at
214; Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 279 cmt. a. Accordingly, National Surety's position is
ultimately implausible because: 1) the 2007 agreement expressly incorporates provisions of the AIA
Contract; 2) the integrated provisions of the AIA Contract further incorporate the AIA Contract in its
entirety; and 3) various other provisions that fall outside the scope of the 2007 agreement still
governed the parties' relationship. As such, the 2007 agreement was not a substitute

Contract Change : Contract Changes
Contract Change Factors Many of you already know that commercial contracts are governed by the
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and government contracts by the Federal Acquisition
Regulations (FAR). While the FAR has seven contract change clauses (FAR 52.243–1 through
52.243–7), each company has its own change clauses. In addition, many States have their own
version of the Uniform Commercial Code, so there is a lot of variability in commercial contract
change clauses. Next, we'll take a look at the text of some contract change clauses. Government
Contract Changes–Fixed Price Clause FAR 52.243–1 The Contracting Officer may at any time, by
written order, and without notice to the sureties, if any, make changes within the general scope of
this contract in any one or more of the following: (1) Drawings, designs, or specifications when the
supplies to be furnished are to be specially manufactured for the Government in accordance with the
drawings, designs, or specifications. (2) Method of shipment or packing. (3) Place of delivery. (b) If
any such change causes an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the time required for, performance
of any part of the work under this contract, whether or not changed by the order, the Contracting
Officer shall make an equitable adjustment in the contract price, the delivery schedule, or both, and
shall modify the contract. (c) The Contractor must assert its right to an adjustment under this clause
within 30 days from the date of receipt of

Contract and Seller
No. 17 Finima Ave., LNG rd., Bonny Island, Rivers–State, Nigeria
freight on board
CRUDE OIL CONTRACT
SALES/PURCHASE CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT
CONTRACT FOR THE SALES AND PURCHASE
OF NIGERIA BONNY LIGHT CRUDE OIL
IS MADE AND ENTERED INTO
BY AND BETWEEN
HABIB TRADING KONSALT (H.T.K)
NO. 17 FINIMAAVENUE, LNG ROAD, BONNY ISLAND
RIVERS STATE, NIGERIA
[HEREINAFTER CALLED THE SELLER]
AND
|COMPANY: | |
|ADDRESS: | |
|REPESENTED ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bill Of Lading: Shall mean the official document, issued at the Load Port after completion of the
loading operations, stating the ships' loaded quantity, expressed in Cubic Meters [cub meters], in
Metric Tons [MT] expressed as per the above definitions. This document has to be signed in original
by the ship master and made out in accordance with the instruction hereinafter specified in this
Agreement.
Vessel: Shall mean the ship whether owned or chartered or otherwise obtained by Buyer and
employed by Buyer to receive the oil at the loading port.

COMMODITY: Nigerian Petroleum Product
Specific Gravity at 150c, kg/1 ASTMD1298/P 0.8397–9.8498 API at 60 Degrees F ASTM Table 51
34 – 37 Salinity ASTMD 4006/1P 358 4.7P.T.B @ 60 Degrees F Color Dark Brown BS & W
Content [Vol. %] ASTMD 473/1P 53 0.25 Average Sulfur %WT ASTMD 0.14% wt Pour Point
Degrees F ASTMD 97/1P.15 40º[F] Degrees F Water Content: 0.2% Vol. Max REIB Vapour
Pressure: 6.52PSIG
QUANTITY AND DURATION:
Shipment of 2 Million US barrels +/–05% with possible rolls and extension at both parties
discretion.
DESTINATION:
TERMINAL LOADING [FOB]
PRICE:
The price for each Barrel of Bonny Light Crude Oil delivered out–turned barrels shall be Dated
Brent" on the date of Bill of Lading as published by McGraw Hill market wire less discount of
$12.00USD per barrel.

The Pros And Cons Of Contract Contracts

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paula Smith

More from Paula Smith (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Pros And Cons Of Contract Contracts