Essay On Major Impacts Of The American Revolution

Essay on Major Impacts of the American Revolution
The American Revolution was a war fought between Great Britain and the American colonies over independence from 1775 to 1783 which resulted in
a fundamental change in American politics, society, and economics. The American Revolution began as a result of Great Britain taxing the colonies to
cover the debts accumulated through the French and Indian War. While the majority of the colonies stayed loyal to their 'Mother Land', some of the
colonist felt resentment toward England. Some colonist felt that England had no right to tax the colonies, while they had no representation in
parliament. This created a divide within in the colonies between those who were in favor of independence–Patriots, and those who were still loyal to
the Crown–... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some of them were crying out for paper currency, some for an equal distribution of property.' Another debate that heated the colonies was the
controversy over the future of agriculture in the colonies. Many thought that America should change into being dependent on commercial
manufacturing, while others wanted to keep agriculture the main source of income. Document F shows the Medal of Philadelphia Society for the
Promotion of Agriculture. The symbolism in the medal is that Farming could be symbolized as the nation looking on into the future, suggesting
abundance, fertility, and liberty. Socially, the War left many groups of people questioning their role in society. When the men went off to fight the war,
the women were left to run the businesses and assume the positions their husbands left behind. Many women, such as Deborah Sampson and Molly
Pitcher picked up their rifles fought alongside the men in the war (Document A). After the war, the women were left questioning their subordinate in
society. Women were finding their worth, and slowly started to demand more rights. In her valedictory address from the Young Ladies' Academy of
Philadelphia, Molly Wallace discussed the educational opportunities women should be given stating 'But to what do they amount? Do they not plainly
inform us, because we are females, we ought
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Analysis Of Patrick Henry 's Speech
On March 23 of 1775, Patrick Henry gave a speech to his fellow Virginians at Saint John's Church– Richmond, VA. What did he want Virginians to do?
He needed to tell the Virginians to arm and defend themselves. Patrick Henry wanted everyone to be on the same page as him on the subject of their
independence. He wanted their independence no matter the cost. He was willing to go to war. The point of his speech was to have the Virginians on
his side about starting to rise against their mother land and begin a revolt against Britain's King George III. His famous words "Give me liberty or
give me death!" brought on an emotional appeal to the colonists which showed that Henry's call to action worked. Another way he affected the listeners
on an emotional level was that he pointed out how the British people made them into slaves for their own benefit. He wanted his fellow Virginians to
open their eyes to the reality of what is going on and not just pretend it is not happening. He was telling them not to trust the British and their
petitions or the acceptance of one. If they did not rise up against the British, they would stay servants to them.How did he justify his desire? Desire
is needed in order to grab the audience's attention. His desire can be seen and heard throughout his speech. Henry was a leader in Virginia and the
other colonies and was known for speaking out and resisting the English rule. This is a way to show how his desires were justified. He grabbed their
attention by

The Meaning Of The Declaration Of Independence In Modern...
Share 308 Tweet Pin 31 Share +1 9 SHARES 348 Us_declaration_independenceSave The Declaration of Independence was written in such a way that
many modern readers today might have a difficult time discerning what the true meaning is behind it. The Declaration of Independence in Modern
English still carries the same meaning, but would sound a little differently. Let's take a look at the Declaration of Independence and re–word it so that
those modern English readers could read and understand it. The Declaration of Independence in Modern English Sometimes in the course of certain
events there comes a time when a certain group feels the need to dissolve the political bands that have connected them with another, or in other
words split up. We believe that God has entitled us to pursue this course and here are the reasons why we feel this way. As people that have founded
this land we believe certain truths and those should not be questioned: we believe that everyone is created equal in the sight of God; God has given
us certain rights; the rights of each person need to be respected and cannot be taken from them. We believe in the right to Life; the right to Liberty;
and the right to pursue our own happiness. We also believe that governments are formed to protect these certain rights and that the power of the
government comes from the power of the people. We also believe that if the government fails to protect the rights of its people that they people have
the right to

The Colonial Incentives for Independence Essays
The Colonial Incentives for Independence July 4th of 1776 is arguably the most significant day in American history. On this day, the thirteen British
colonies won their independence from Great Britain, their mother country at the time. The war that allowed the colonies to gain their independence
was, of course, the American Revolution. One reason the colonists' declaration of independence was understandable was because after an extended
period of salutary neglect, the British started imposing laws on the colonies. Another reason was that the British violated colonists' rights by
implementing the Proclamation of 1763. A third and final reason the colonies were correct in breaking away from Great Britain was that although the...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These taxes and laws angered the colonies as they had adapted to isolation and started to become more independent.
A second reason was because the colonists' rights were violated when the British passed the Proclamation of 1763. This law was passed after the
French and Indian War ended in 1763. It restricted colonists to settle west of the Appalachian Mountains. Great Britain passed this law in order to avoid
quarrels with the Native Americans, but more importantly to control its colonies. The British wanted to continue its system of mercantilism where the
colonies could provide raw materials to Great Britain, which guaranteed the market for exports. The colonists' western expansion was being stopped
and at the same time laws and taxes were being inflicted on them. The restrictions that the British set for expanding westward and their sudden
involvement made colonists feel like their rights were being violated.
Finally, the thirteen colonies had the right to secede from Great Britain because of their lack of representation in British Parliament. After the Molasses
Act, the Quartering Act, and the Stamp Act were passed, the colonists cried out the well–known expression, "No taxation without representation." The
colonists

The Declaration Of Independence In America And The...
Imagine: it is the late 18th century, and the colonies of America are in a dilemma. In the previous years of their existence, the colonies have been under
the control and maintenance of Great Britain. At this time, there has been a division between the colonists. One one side, there are people who believe
in the separation from Great Britain, and the establishment of independence. On the other hand, there are people who believe in maintaining the
relationship between America and Great Britain, and remain having the role as a territory for a superpower. In the end, the colonies of America chose
the better option to declare independence rather than to reconcile with Great Britain for it would give them the freedom to self govern, create their own
system of government, and the redevelopment of American–made industries. To begin, America was better off declaring independence because it
allowed the colonies to be self–governed. The ability to self govern was essential to America, and was a necessity that was emphasized in the
Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence does this by stating the unfair treatment and laws received from Great Britain's King
George III. the Declaration (US, 1776) states,"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all
having in direct object of an absolute tyranny over these states." (paragraph 3 of the Declaration of Independence). What this quote from the
Declaration is

A Piece of Revolutionary War History Essays
During the beginning of Colonial America, there were many people who migrated from Europe to settle the new founded American Continent. They
traveled from Europe to escape the laws, taxes, demands, and nobility brought upon them at the hands of King George III and Parliament. They wanted
to be free from the tyranny of King George III. When the colonist arrived on the American Continent they felt freedoms that they had never before felt.
After, feeling the freedom of being on this newly found continent King George once again started putting his demands on the Colonist. Eventually, the
colonist saw their rights being taken away by the acts that were passed, the taxes that were implemented, and the Proclamation of 1763. The Tyranny of
King... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The war cost 140 million pounds. The British felt that this war was fought on behalf of the colonist. Therefore, the colonist should be responsible to
payback a portion of the money spent on the war. Not only did Great Britain impose new taxes on the colonist they also Passed the Proclamation of
1763 which stated that the colonist were not allowed to settle land anywhere west of the Appalachian Mountains. This was to stop further
encroachment among Native Americans. This outraged the colonist because there were already settlements in that part of the country. The colonist
felt that the Proclamation of 1763 was interfering with their economic growth and there was no way Parliament was going to be able to enforce this
action. They believed that nothing would stop the natural progression westward. The taxes that followed this Proclamation are: (1) 1764 the "Sugar
Act" was passed which was an attempt from the British to actually collect the tax on molasses. Originally it was a tax of 6 pence per gallon that was
impossible to collect. By the British reducing this to 3 pence per gallon they thought this tax would be easier to collect. (2) 1765 "Quartering Act" This
act stated that during times of war and during times of peace the colonist would have to house British Soldiers in North America. This act furthered
tensions between Britain and the colonist because they were forced to open their home to British soldiers at all times.

Why Was Pitt Able to Dominate Politics Between 1783 and 1793
Why was Pitt able to dominate politics between 1783 and 1793?
In the late 18th century, William Pitt managed to turn what looked like an unstable political situation, the government being known as the "Mince–pie
administration", into a period of dominance for him and his supporters. So strong was his hold on politics at the time that he was able to pass an
India Bill in 1784, just two years after Fox's version of the bill had been rejected and forced the Fox–North coalition out of power. Pitt also had many
successes financially, never having trouble in passing his budgets between 1783 and 1993. So how did Pitt manage to gain such a stronghold on
British Politics in this key decade of British history? Even though by this decade the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He also had issues with his image, which was already in a state of ruins at the beginning of Pitt's 10 years of domination, being seen by many as
hypocritical and power hungry due to his part in the Fox–North coalition. In a sense he carried too much baggage from the previous government. The
next 10 years did nothing to reverse this. Fox's associations with the Prince of Wales had a detrimental effect on his viewing by the public and
parliament. During the Mrs Fitzherbert ordeal, the Prince lied to Fox, telling him that he had not married her. Fox then passed this information on
to parliament, telling the MPs what they had heard in the press was all untrue. Unfortunately for Fox, soon after it became apparent that the Prince
of Wales and Mrs Fitzherbert had been secretly wed, making Fox either a liar or an idiot in the eyes of the people and MPs. Another defining
incident for Fox was a debate surrounding the regency crisis. Fox, wishing for his friend, the Prince, to come into power, declared that he had no
issue with the Prince taking over. In doing this he "unwhigged" himself, effectively arguing the Tory position, as well as seeming overtly opportunistic.
The main issue with Fox and his party which caused Pitt to have little trouble in parliament was the nature of their opposition. The Foxites opposed
almost every bill Pitt ever suggested. A year after Fox had

The Act That Ignited the Revolution Essay
Prior to gaining its independence, America endured various controlling methods brought on by the Crown that were focused on directly benefiting
Britain, rather than Britain providing much–needed support and assistance to the colonists attempting to settle the new rugged land. While attempts to
control every aspect of daily life in the colonies was nothing new, the most critical and obviously selfish move was The Stamp Act of 1775 (Tindall
& Shi, 2010). This tax, proposed by Chief Minister of Britain, George Grenville, and enforced by King George III, was the first law or tax passed
without allowing any voice or opportunity for repeal from the colonists. The Stamp Act was proposed by Grenville as part of his strategy to raise
revenue not... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
121). While there were many controls, regulations, and taxes placed on the colonists from Britain without representation of the mainstream society,
Britain did provide the larger cities with an opportunity to voice concern to various Representatives and Governors appointed by the Crown (Tindall
& Shi, 2010). The Stamp Act was different in that not only did it have the largest affect on day to day life of the businessmen, who were the most
vocal and influential colonists, it was imposed without any opportunity to voice alternative solutions from the colonists or the appointed officials
present in the colonies (Tindall & Shi, 2010). The famous quote, "No taxation without representation" displays the outrage this selfish British act
caused among the colonists. This was the first move made by King George III that showed that he intended to use Britain's new land for revenue
building during his reign and this patronizing and disrespectful act ignited a series of events that became the American Revolution (Tindall & Shi,
2010). Driven by their anger toward the Crown for implementing this thoughtless tax, the colonists began to unite despite their varying religious and
political views. This was the first time the colonist came together and looked past their differences for the good of the colonies as a whole. Bostonians
displayed their outrage by hanging a disrespectful depiction

The Significance of William Pitt in Reforming the British...
The Significance of William Pitt in Reforming the British Parliamentary System
Successive Kings of England, George I (1714–1727) and George II (1727–60), both proved highly disinterested in the political aspects of their country.
As a result of this disinterest, each in turn had to leave national ruling to the Government. Subsequently, in 1716 the Septennial Act was passed, which
extended the life of parliament from 3 to 7 years. This provided for an unprecedented period of parliament stability, and ultimately limited the powers
of the king.' (Barnett, 2002 p654). Political power had now shifted from the king to his chosen first minister. Parliament at this time could not be
described as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, they were patiently awaiting their position as minister in the House of Lords. It is in the House of Lords they would have most power. House
of Commons members had no social responsibility at this time. The running of Government was very corrupt and members were not concerned about
keeping their seats as they inherited their positions. The use of sinecures is at an all time high and a mere 4% of the population had the right to vote.
The Monarchy had indirect power and was able to use taxes and funding to achieve beneficial results in Parliament that suited their own interests.
William Pitt was raised in a highly politically aware family. His father William, who was the First Earl of Chatham (1766) |took great interest and
William junior was sent to Cambridge for his university education. "The Earl of Chatham was determined that his son would eventually become a
member of the House of Commons and at an early age, William was given lessons on how to become an effective orator" (Sparticus, 2005 Pg1). At
Cambridge, William Pitt studied political philosophy among other subjects. "At university, Pitt worked hard and showed a reserved, aloof and
self–controlled character" (Biography of William Pitt, 2005 p1). Pitt suffered with gout and this combined with an antiquated privilege that allowed
noblemen's sons to graduate without examination, meant that Pitt was able to

The Impact Of The Proclamation Of 1763
The day was October 7th 1763. The air was cold in Britain, and what happened in Britain that day changed the course of history. King George III
issued the Proclamation of 1763. This all started because of the French and Indian war. The French and Indian war was a war fought between the
British and France who had the Native Americans on their side. It was Britain versus the rest of North America. It was a grueling war, but Britain
eventually prevailed. After this war, the King created the Proclamation of 1763. After the French and Indian war, the relationship between the
American colonists and Britain was strained because Britain took away their land, the colonists didn't like the Proclamation of 1763, and Britain had
listened to the Native Americans over the Colonists. The relationship between the colonists and Britain was strained because Britain took away their
land. According to Document A, the American colonists had gained a lot more land after the French and Indian war. But, the Proclamation of 1763
took all of it away and they had the same land they started with. I think everyone would be very mad if someone took away something you had just
got. The colonists had worked hard for that land. They had lost lives the same as the British, but then British took that land away from the colonists
and had reserved it for the Indians. The colonists had died for that land. Fathers, brothers, sons, had all died in that war and their mourning families
were barred from

The American Revolution And American History Essay
The American Revolution was an important moment in American history. The revolution shed new light on how people could live and how a nation
could be governed. Looking back, one might think that the British saw the American colonists as a group of people easy to conquer. In the time period
of the American Revolution, women were seen more as property rather than active participants in war, but women played a large part in the war. In the
end, the American Revolution transformed the United States from a collection of agrarian colonies into a self–sustaining country. The American
Revolution was the war that decided the United States' independence. The war between the United Stated and Britain lasted 8 years, 1775–1783, but
the tension between these two formed long before the war began. The tension between the two countries escalated when King George III began to tax
the American colonies. The Stamp Act, The Townshend Tariffs, and the Tea Act, all increased the tension between Great Britain and the United States.
Violence between the two sides escalated quickly when British soldiers fired upon a mob in Boston. This slaughter later became known as the Boston
Massacre. Later, in 1773, British Parliament became even more outraged with the colonials after the event known as the Boston Tea Partyand created
the Coercive Acts, making clear that the British were the authority. In 1775 the Continental Congress met in Philadelphia and declared independence
from Great Britain thereby

The Great Principles Of The American Revolution
The creation of the American nation became what it is today from years of struggle in which the common people, as well as the Founding Fathers,
played a vital part for independence. The promise of the Revolution, a nation based on the republican ideals of liberty, independence, and equality, was
to some extent achieved. Yet the great principles of the Revolution have long shaped our thoughts of what it means to be an American. All the events
leading up and after the American Revolution will have effects on the common people. The story of George Robert Twelves Hewes helps historians
comprehend the part that the common people played in their struggle for freedom and republican ideals they wanted to achieve for the generations to
come in the new nation. The common people were important because if they didn't join John Hancock, Samuel Adams, and other wealthy leaders then
the American Revolution would have never taken place. The common people made up the bulk of the Continental Army, without convincing the bulk
of those people, they would have stayed loyal the King George III. The common people in the colonial era of the United States were made mostly up of
people that worked in trade areas such as shoemakers, smiths, carpenters, and other trades within that time. Most of them were poor, especially if a
colonist was in the shoemaking trade. John Adams, said that shoemaking was, "too mean and diminutive an occupation, to hold a client of his who
wanted to rise in the world."1

Responsibility Of Women In Upper Classes In Pride And...
In the past, women had very few rights, yet held many responsibilities to their families and to their society. Women in upper classes in regency
England, as shown in the novel, Pride and Prejudice, were held to incredibly high expectations with making sure their homes and families were
appealing to the public, because everything was reflected on to them. Most women, Mrs. Bennet for example, during this period had the same
responsibilities, but different household incomes put different priorities on what should be done to keep the family in line. Upper class wives and
mothers, as Miss Bingley, had a responsibility to control and direct, more than physically getting work done. The position of keeping the family, house,
and their selves kept... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If a woman didn't conform to societies set position for her, she probably wouldn't find a man to marry. The woman's family wouldn't want anything
to do with her because their reputations would be in danger. As in Pride and Prejudice, "An unhappy alternative is before you, Elizabeth. From this
day you must be a stranger to one of your parents. Your mother will never see you again if you do not marry Mr. Collins, and I will never see you
again if you do", marrying is not a question (Austen 107). If a woman is in her twenties with no man in mind, she is running out of time before people
start to turn on her and men will want to marry

The Kings Speech : A Film Adaptation Of A True Story
The 2010 critically acclaimed film "The Kings Speech" aimed to showcase the struggles of King George VI as he dealt with his stammer and
becoming King. The tale follows the King along with his therapist Lionel Logue, as they try and find the best way to cope with the issue before the
Kings first wartime radio broadcast. Although this movie is just a film adaptation of a true story, it is still able to show the viewer a lot about British
Culture during the 1920's, which has even carried into the modern day. Additionally, "The Kings Speech" reveals the importance of saving face as
well as power distance within the United Kingdom. At the beginning of the movie, the relationship between Lionel, and King George VI, (who is
referred to, as Bertie throughout), is weak. This may be due to the fact that many place special treatment on him because of his Royal namesake. When
Lionel and Bertie first met, Lionel made sure not to sit too close and waited for the prince to choose a topic of conversation. This reveals that the Royal
family plays a big role in British culture. They place a lot of emphases as well as respect on them, and they are very much a part of their lives. The
emphasis on the royal family and the fact that this movie was even created about King George VI suggests that British culture puts a lot of value on
their history. They are very much about keeping tradition and sharing their history, which is why they created a film doing just that. When a royal

King George The Third: King Who Lost America
King George the third
King George the third was known as the king that lost America. He was born on may 24th, 1738 in London England, and he lived in England his
whole life. He ruled over Britain, and the American colonies. King George shaped our country's past by tightening the colonists freedom this
motivated the colonists to win their freedom. King george also had many personal problems like mental sickness and depression, sadly on January
24th, 1820 king George the third passed away. King George the Third was raised in London, England. George and his brother were raised by his
parents, until george was twelve when their Dad, also known as the Prince of Wales. He died when George was only twelve years old. This forced
young George to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Britain needed money. Instead of sleeping with silk sheets he decided to sleep with cotton ones, this is just one of the many sacrifices that King George
made to benefit Great Britain. He with the help from parliament he also decided to benefit from the colonies by taxing them. The colonies did not agree
with the many laws and acts that were made to tax the colonies and to tighten their freedoms. The Colonist started to revolt. This started the revolution.
King George has influenced many lives including mine. Without him there may still be monarchy. There might not have been the American revolution.
Without King George the third future generations might still have been living with the power in one hand. It is very important to learn about King
George because now we know that other opinions can benefit us. King George only had one opinion, his own. There were never any other ideas, that
could have changed the way Great Britain and The United states could have cooperated. We can also take other people's opinion into consideration, so
that we don't put our country in jeopardy. Although Winning the American revolution was a great surprise, and reconstructing our country payed off.
Americans would have been better off as a nation without King George the third America would have started out construction with more money and
more organization. The colonies lost millions of dollars fighting the war. They

This Narrative Will Give You Information On Womenв
Ђ™S Roles
This narrative will give you information on women's roles in the 18th and 19th century. It will discuss Queen Victoria role, and her thoughts when she
ruled in the 18th century and Harriet Tubman's role and her views during the 19th century. If the two met, their conversation could start by both of
them asking questions about their views and concerns during their time. Queen Victoria would have started the dialog by asking Harriet questions
about their similarities and when did she become so passionate about her freedom and the freedom of other slaves. Queen Victoria would proceed with
other questions such as Harriet's leadership abilities and her capability of leading black slaves to their freedom without losing anyone on their... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her mother was Victoire Maria Louisa of Saxe–Coburg. Queen Victoria became the successor to the British crown after the death of her uncle George
IV in 1825. Members of Parliament gave royalty to the princess (Daniels, 2016). The first couple of days of her rule were quite remarkable in
which she showed poise, composure, and she had experienced in governmental procedures of her state. Queen Victoria delegates were surprised
and agreed with her knowledge she was given in her training, as a child growing up. Queen Victoria took to her responsibilities with ease as
though she had the experience of a person having been doing such a job for a while and gaining experience along the way. In doing so, she earned
the respect of her subjects giving her the appearance of presence of mind. Her looks seem to be delightful along with her youth, which influenced an
immeasurable interest in all who came in contact with her. Queen Victoria had respect for others, her compassion was of school children in a
memorandum to her minister, Lord Melbourne advising him to give an additional holiday to school officials to approve a holiday on for coronations in
the future (Browne, 2005). During this period, times were hard and her subjects were depressed, along with adversities and bad business management
kept the nation in a state of unrest. There were people in the community that caused issues of disturbances in

Why Did The British Lose The Revolutionary War?
Why Did The British Lose the Revolutionary War? Many factors contributed to the British losing the American Revolutionary War. By the 1770's the
American colonists were not socially, religiously, or culturally connected to Britain. The colonists has their own ways of life and thus were not British
by culture. The majority of the colonists had immigrated to America to escape the rigid class structures of Britain and Europe. The Americans had lived
independently and autonomously from Great Britain since the Puritans arrived in Massachusetts in 1620. They had developed their own patriotism and
did not consider themselves to be British subjects. Thus, they no longer wanted or needed Britain, for the British were like foreigners in America. After
having years of benign British neglect, and after capably governing themselves, the people in the American colonies were not pleased when the British
Parliament decided after the end of the successful end of the French Indian War in 1763 to become more engaged in the American colonists' affairs. The
British government wanted to protect the American colonies from future Indian and other attacks. Consequently, the British Parliament imposed
taxation on the colonists in the 1760's. The colonists resented this intrusion, for they felt they were not truly represented in the British government.
Taxation without representation became the rallying cry of the colonists. On July 2, 1776, the American Continental Congress in

Was The American Revolution Radical Or Radical
The American Revolution is typically looked at as a conservative movement, but it seems most of the actions taken were very radical. They were
fighting to defend their rights, governed and natural. The American Revolution was as radical as any other revolution, in a special 18th century way,
and this seems to hold true while looking at the new waves of thinking. It involves the Whigs and Tories, and while they are at opposite sides of the
spectrum, they consecutively agreed to not address and higher–law principles so they would not have to rework their entire system.. The Revolution
worked against this, and the parties chose to pretend it was not a serious movement and act, as they believed it would not take any effect. More
people got involved and all aspects of life began to be questioned and revolutionized. The Revolution seems to be radical in a more definitive way as it
caused segregation of beliefs, the Declaration of independence, and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The people were finally being valued and everyone was given a chance to work towards improving the things taking place around them. While it is
very debatable, the actions that were taken and how individuals started to think on their own cause the Revolution to be a special and more
defining type of radical. There has never been a revolution that has been born out of ideas alone and this time, it was at least the beginning of seeing
change. Starting with the Tories and Whigs reformation, carrying out through the war and even the justice and social systems, the radicalism started
growing and spreading. There was still a long way to go and a huge separation between conservative and liberal views, but it was a revolution for the
people. It was special for the 18th century and was able to be carried out due to the segregation of beliefs, the magnum opus, and the acts of the

Analysis Of The Movie ' Hamilton '
Essay 4
Hamilton has created a revolution. Hamilton: An American Musical is a musical created by Lin–Manuel Miranda. The musical is based on a book
written by Ron Chernow about Alexander Hamilton's life. The story narrates the founding of the United States. The show is being called a revolution
due to its language. Lin–Manuel Miranda is being called this generation's Shakespeare. They both use modern language to reach their audience. In this
case, the language is Rap and Hip Hop. Most broadways show reach fame, Lin–Manuel Miranda manages to capture the attention of not only broadway
fans but also captures the attention of non–broadway fans. The plot revolves around the life of Alexander Hamilton and the people he meets. The plot
starts at the beginning of his life until his death. Although its plot surrounds five decades it is very detailed. Miranda only reveals the details he
think are important. It is easy to keep up with even though it has a fast pace. The first act tells the story of revolution and how Hamilton meets his
wife Eliza Schuyler. In this act, Hamilton is trying to make a name for himself by fighting in the war but instead becomes George Washington's
secretary. The second act is a bit more somber and has a slower pace. This act is also more dramatic and evokes more emotion. In this act Hamilton and
the other founding fathers are trying to create the country from the ground up. Act two starts up very energetic and in the middle it becomes somber.
Although it

Examples Of Virtual Representation In The American Colonies
After the French and Indian War the United Colonies and Britain began to clash. This was, for the most part, due to taxation without representation.
Britain had began to tax the colonists heavily due to the debt of the war. On top of this King George III had just made the proclamation of 1763,
preventing all colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains. This upset the colonists because they had just fought risking their lives for
that land and now they are told they cannot use it. Britain's point of view on "taxation without representation" was that the colonists were being
represented through virtual representation. While the colonists' point of view was that virtual representation was not a fair way to be represented and
instead should be represented through actual representation. Britain believes that the best way for the colonies of america to be represented is through
virtual representation. Virtual representation means that the representatives themselves are not necessarily from the region they are representing.
Britain's thinking process on this, and argument of why virtual is better than actual representation, is because with virtual they are able to have an
expert on that region as the representative instead of someone who may be from that region but is less qualified. An example of virtual representation
was the Stamp Act where the colonists had no say or control over it being passed. The Stamp Act was a direct tax on paper products. Other examples of

Revolutionary War A Just War Analysis
Have you ever wondered if the beginning of the United Sates was based off of a just war? Saint Augustine, a renowned Christian theologian and
philosopher, addressed the idea of a just war during the time of the Roman Empire. Augustine is well–known for his book City of God in which he first
introduces his standards of a just war. These standards must be met for a war to be classified as just. This new concept that war could be approved
by God and used for good revolutionized the way Christians viewed war. Although written hundreds of years ago, these standards have truly stood the
test of time because they are still referred to today. Based on Augustine's standards, The Revolutionary War can be argued as a just war because there
was a just... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, war has changed significantly over the past few decades. America should tighten their standards of war so that we are only involved in wars
hat directly threaten our national security. This would result in America taking part in far fewer conflicts which would save money and resources,
reduce the number of unnecessary lives lost, and reduce the hatred of America in many countries. Tightening the standards would insure that future
wars are fought for the protection of our country, but not for spreading democracy or nation building. America has continuously meddled in other
countries affairs, which has led to a growing anger and resentment of America in those countries. Reducing anger towards America becomes even more
important since our country now has a relatively open immigration policy which has allowed immigrants from countries into America. Without
knowing who these immigrants are or what their intentions are, our country becomes more susceptible to

How Did Abigail Adams Contribute To The American Revolution
Abigail Adams: Born November 11, 1774 in Weymouth, MA. She's the wife of John Adams, first lady of the United States, and the son of John
Quincy Adams. In particular, she played a huge role in the American Revolution. Abigail Adams served as the Massachusetts Colony General Court
who commissioned her, along with a few other women, to talk to ladies in the area who were loyal to the British. This was only the first of her
dealings with women 's influence in politics. Because she and her husband were away from each other often for extended periods, the two of them
corresponded through lengthy letters. In some of these letters, Abigail urged her husband, during the days surrounding the Declaration of Independence
and the Revolutionary War, to pay attention to the rights of women. She believed women 's rights should equal those of the men. She did not bring the
founding fathers around to her way of thinking, but she continued to campaign for various equalities for females, including the right to a formal
education. Her husband went on to become the second President of the United States. Abigail Adams died before her son, John Quincy, became the sixth
President. As a result of Abigail Adams, women became powerful and impacting figures during theAmerican revolution, thus bringing them closer to
gaining civil rights.
John Adams (1735–1826) :An American patriot who served as the second President of the United States from 1797–1801 and the first Vice President.
He also was a

Grievances Of The Declaration Of Independence
The Declaration of Independence was written to declare that America would be free and that it would no longer be under the rule of King George III.
The declaration has a total of twenty–seven grievances which are complaints towards the King and the government of Britain. One of the many
grievances stated in the declaration is that "He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislature". This
whole process began towards the beginning of 1763. After the Seven Years War ended in February 1763, the king did not withdraw the British troops
from America. Instead, he left a lot of the troops in America forcing the colonists to house and support them. According to colonialhall.com, the troops
stayed in America in order to enforce the laws; especially with the new taxes that were about to take place. Although the troops did help by protecting
colonists and enforcing the laws, it was unnecessary for them to stay. The colonists knew how to defend themselves so there was really no reason for
this. It seemed that the King did this, not just to enforce laws, but also to make them fearful so that they would surrender to him. Although the Kings
intentions were to get the colonists to appease to him, that did not happen. This only made the colonists fear that they would lose all their rights and it
made them angry with the King. "Jefferson wrote that if the King did indeed have the right to keep standing armies in the colonies during times of

The American Revolutionary War Was Truly Revolutionary?
AP U.S History: D.B.Q.
American Revolution Prompt: Analyze the extent to which the American Revolutionary War was truly 'revolutionary?'"
The American Revolution, which occurred approximately from 1765 to 1786, is also known as the American Revolutionary War and the U.S. War of
Independence, for good reason. The conflict rose from rising tensions amid the people of Great Britain's thirteen American colonies and the colonial
government, which represented the British crown. Clashes between Britain's troops and colonial militiamen in Lexington and Concord in April 1775
kicked off the armed conflict, and by the following summer, the rebels were waging a full–scale war for their independence. The American Revolution
had tremendous consequences, and was not simply a victory of arms on the battlefield, but also a feat of economic and political ideals, and vital
societal changes. This huge period of history set into motion greater changes in American life and created a country, demonstrating just how this
revolutionary age in time more than earned its name. This battle of independence waged by the American colonies against Britain influenced political
ideas and revolutions around the globe, as a young, largely divided nation won its freedom from the greatest military force of its time. The American
Revolution had huge and idealistic effects on the American population. It was social revolution. To a large extent, it sparked a fire within their hearts
over the idea

Common Sense By Thomas Paine
Kayla Boucher Doctor Hockin AMH 2010 22 January 2015 Common Sense The book Common Sense by Thomas Paine was an American pamphlet
written during the American Revolution, which was around the time when America was trying to gain independence from Britain. Paine discusses
government, religion, and colonial issues. In the first chapter Paine differentiates between the society and the government. He described the society
as being positive and constructive and he described the government being a necessary evil. Meaning the colonist needed to have some form of
government to protect themselves from the basic rights. Paine also confronts the British government saying that their government is far too
complicated and controversial, and that it would eventually cause problems for the colonists and the hierarchies. He makes up a pretend situation
with a group of people on an island who are cut off from the general population. After developing relationships with one another the lawmaking
portion becomes unavoidable. Paine says the people will be better off if they make up the rules they have to abide by instead of having set rules the
King comes up with himself. Paine then talks about the concepts of monarchy and hereditary succession and how Israel once did not have a king but
the ancient Jewish people had wanted one to keep the order and the peace among them. Paine says when the Jews decided they wanted a king and
God was infuriated, pages from the bible were displayed in this

Rhetorical Analysis Of Common Sense
In the year of 1776, emotions intensify in Colonial America creating an atmosphere prime for dissidence and a yearning for independence. The livid
Americans, overtaxed and mistreated by the British after the French and Indian War, debate and argue amongst themselves about the fate of their
fledgling colony. The American colonies interested in seeking independence from their motherland Britain, look abroad in hopes of finding moral and
political reasons to justify revolution. In the pamphlet, Common Sense, Frenchman Thomas Paine conveys such reasons using rhetorical elements such
as figurative language, rhetorical questions, and assertions in order to enhance the morale of the colonists and support the Americans in their
revolution against Britain.
Proving that the liberties of the common people are something worth fighting for, Paine uses relatable figurative language in order to provide a more
personal connection to the colonists in hopes of encouraging the proverbial David to stand up and wage war against Goliath. Paine pens an analogy
stating that if a "child has thrived upon milk" then the child will never want "meat". This analogy elicits a critical turning point in Paine's pamphlet as
he transitions from asking rhetorical questions to authoritative and comparative statements. Paine alludes to the overwhelming axiom that the colonies
have been a baby drinking milk only satisfied by meeting the needs of Britain, instead of standing up for their individual rights and

Hotel 's Park And The Surrounding Area
Regent's Park and the surrounding area is the product of extensive planning and represents an interesting time for London's development; even today
it is considered the greatest planning scheme in London's history. The land that makes up the park was originally a forest known as Marylebone
Park and had been used by both royalty and farmers before the Regent development projects began in the early 1800's. This development included
Regent's Park, Regent's canal and Regent Street; all part of the grand scheme planned by architect John Nash and approved by the Prince Regent. The
original plans for the park were extravagant and included more than 50 villas in the park along with several other structures including a church and a
pleasure palace... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The leases for the farmlands of Marylebone Park were signed for 150 years and set to expire during the year 1811, the same year in which the
Regency began. The Regency Era began when George IV became the Prince Regent in 1811 due to his father King George III's becoming unfit to
rule. The Prince enjoyed living a lavish and extravagant lifestyle and had a desire to create grandeur in arts and architecture while in power. The
Regency may have officially ended in 1820 when Prince Regent became King George IV, but the era of Regency Architecture has loosely defined
boundaries and can be considered from the beginning of the 19th century until 1830 when King George IV died. Regency architecture evolved out of
the Georgian era and typically uses very similar forms although details in materials, decoration and movement became more important in the Regency
era. One of, if not the most iconic architects of the Regency period is the architect for the Regent's Park scheme, John Nash. John Nash was architect
for the government offices of Woods and Forests when the Prince Regent came to power and Nash's scheme for Regent's Park was presented almost
immediately. The plan appealed to the Prince Regent who was impressed by the extravagant nature and stated that his developments of London, 'will
quite eclipse Napoleon'. John Nash impressed the Prince and became the advisor on architecture, allowing him to

Political Causes Of The American Revolution
The American Revolution was an inevitable uprising of the oppressed colonies in British North America. After years of unnecessary taxation and
overbearing laws from the royal crown, the colonist began to show civil disobedience against their mother country. Both countries had tension left after
the French and Indian War. There was different views about who should pay for the war debts. The revolutionary war was fought over the increased
political, economic, and social control over the colonies by England.
As a result of England being a major political power of this time period, they showed it in their ruling of other colonies. When the colonies did not agree
with them they taxed unnecessarily. They colonist made political statements to show the tight control Britain was attempting would not work. Events
such as the Boston Tea Party, shown in Document 8, the colonist made a political statement against the British by dumping their tea in the Boston
Harbor. The document depicts the colonist and some dressed as natives dumping the tea. This form of protesting led to the creation of rebel, political
groups, such as Sons of Liberty. Document 7 pictures the Proclamation Line of 1763. The political aspect of this event is most important in
understanding how the overbearing control of England led to the revolution. Britain believe they had the right to control how far colonial America
could expand. King George III declared that the colonist could not move past the Appalachian

The Methods Of The American Revolution
The Methods Leading to the American Revolution The colonist's rebellious reaction to the British King and Parliaments actions led to their American
Revolution. Did the colonists rebel in a justice form or was Great Britain taking advantage of them? Did the methods they used like the Boston Tea
Party and Boston Massacre proper? Was Great Britain right not to include colonists to represent in Parliament? Was it right for Great Britain to tax the
colonists or were the colonists right to revolt? The leading events toward the American Revolution started when the colonist objected paying taxes to
Great Britain. They felt it violated their rights as British people because the acts were passed in England without a colonial representative. Not only
did the British taxation cause their revolution, but it was also a unifying force in the colonies. After gaining France's North American territory in the
Seven Years war, Britain faced huge debt and the responsibility of a massive land. The purpose for this land was to gather the resources and make extra
profit to benefit England. Before Great Britain started enforcing taxes and acts, the colonists lived a life of prosperity and governed themselves. Great
Britain showed salutary neglect towards them, and due to this, the colonists were not willing to be "tied down" with their governing. They argued The
French and Indian War wasn't their responsibility and the British shouldn't tax them without representation, while the British

The American Crisis By Thomas Paine
The American Crisis is a pamphlet series by 18th century Enlightenment philosopher and author Thomas Paine, originally published from 1776 to 1783
during the American Revolution. Often known as The American Crisis or simply The Crisis, there are 16 pamphlets in total. Thirteen numbered
pamphlets were published between 1776 and 1777, with three additional pamphlets released between 1777 and 1783. The first of the pamphlets were
published in Pennsylvania Journal. Paine signed the pamphlets with the pseudonym, "Common Sense."The pamphlets were contemporaneous with
early parts of the American Revolution, during a time when colonists needed inspiring works. Paine, like many other politicians and scholars, knew that
the Colonists weren 't going ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Paine sees the British political and military maneuvers in America as "impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God." Paine states that
he believes God supports the American cause, "that God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction, or leave them unsupportedly to
perish, who have so earnestly and so repeatedly sought to avoid the calamities of war, by every decent method which wisdom could invent".Paine
takes great lengths to state that Americans do not lack force, but "a proper application of that force" – implying throughout that an extended war can
lead only to defeat unless a stable army was composed not of militia but of trained professionals. But Paine maintains a positive view overall, hoping
that this American crisis can be quickly resolved, "for though the flame of liberty may sometimes cease to shine, the coal can never expire.The Crisis
No. 1 starts out with the famous line "These are the times that try men 's souls," and goes on to talk about how Britain has no right to invade America,
saying that it is a power belonging "only to God." He also says that "if being bound in that manner is not slavery, then there is not such a thing

The Proclamation Of 1763 And How Did It Lead To The...
"OUTRAGE! to think that King George lll would put another limit on our freedom." This quote explains the point of view of the colonists. The
Royal Proclamation was a limit on the colonists signed by King George the third on October the 7th. What was the proclamation of 1763 and how did
it lead to the Revolutionary War? The Proclamation of 1763 was a document stating that British colonists could not go past the Appalachian mountains.
It was signed on October 7th 1763 by british king, King George the Third. The goal of this document was to keep the colonists mainly out of the Ohio
River Valley. This was the American indians land. King George the third just wanted to avoid another costly war with the American Indians, and to
protect the colonists.

The Declaration Of Independence And Its Effect On The...
During the time leading up to July 4th, 1776, the colonies were ruled by King George III. Tyranny took hold of the colonies until Thomas Jefferson
created The Declaration of Independence. In this document Jefferson stated numerous grievances against the king and depicted those hardships that
the colonies experienced under his rule. Historians have come to debate whether these accusations were true or exaggerated. Many historical
events demonstrate how these grievances had a negative effect on the colonies. Many of the colonies felt that laws were passed to benefit King
George III without considering the needs of the colonies. One of the grievances noted, "He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies
without the Consent of our legislatures." This grievance is supported by factual events that occurred during the 1700's. After the French War, King
George III did not withdraw soldiers from the colonies. On March 24th, 1765, Parliament passed the Quartering Act. This required the colonies to
pay or find shelter for the British Soldiers. Many of the colonies did not support this law and refused to take part. This act was passed without the
input and approval of the colonies. This is demonstrated by New York's refusal to comply with the newly passed law due to feeling as though they
were forced. This negatively affected the colonist because soldiers were taking over their homes and eating all the food. Due to noncooperation
Parliament passed the New York Restraining

Portrait Of William Pitt The Younger Painted By George...
"Portrait of William Pitt the Younger painted by John Young, 1797 "
"Portrait of William Wilberforce from a picture by George Richmond. Under the Superintendence of the society for the diffusion of useful knowledge.
London Published by Charles Knight and company Ludgate Street. Engraved by E. Scriven."
The portrait of William Pitt the Younger, that hangs in the Center for Study of the Life and Work of William Carey, D.D., Museum and Research
Collection. It was painted by John Young in 1797, while Pitt was serving as the Prime minister of Great Britain. William Pitt the Younger, is best
known for, at the age of 24, serving as the youngest prime minister of Great Britain. His father William Pitt the Elder, also served as the prime minister
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His portrait can also be found at the museum. It is from a picture painted by George Richmond, who under the superintendence of the society for the
diffusion of useful knowledge painted it. The painting was engraved by Edward Scriven. Wilberforce, a strong abolitionist, was a member of
parliament and supported the work of William Carey. Wilberforce and Pitt meet at Cambridge University. After Pitt became prime minister, Wilberforce
supported him during the difficult months of transition. Wilberforce was not only an abolitionist, he also was a philanthropist and a politician. In
March of 1784, Wilberforce delivered a speech at the Yorkshire County meeting in the Castle Yard at York, in which he announced himself to the
assembled freeholders. This brought him much public attention, in which he emerged as a compromise Pittite candidate. On April 6th, he won the
election, and was a representative of Yorkshire,England's largest county. He achieved all this at the young age of 24 years old! This position helped
open his way to political weight which helped him later in his career. In 1785, Wilberforce because a Christian. Isaac Milner was the primary
influence for his decision for Christ. He sought spiritual guidance from the foremost evangelical clergyman, John Newton. Through a variety of
associations, Wilberforce started to gain a concern for the welfare of the slaves and for the abolition of the slave trade. In May

Lao Tzu Oligarchies
Throughout the time of recorded history, humans have had the natural desire for protection and order. That desire is where government comes in.
There have been many forms of government throughout history, according to Aristotle, there have only been two types, oligarchies and democracies.
Aristotle goes on to say that there are variations of these governments; for example, an aristocracy is considered to be an oligarchy where the wealthy
land owners make the decisions in government. Later in that same paragraph, he states that a republic is a form of democracy; these are not the only
variations of democracies and oligarchies as there are many variations of these two types of government along the spectrum (Aristotle 3). Societies all
through history have one thing in common, they all had some form of government; This raises the question though, what is the difference between a
good and bad government? Lao Tzu has an insight on the differences between a good and bad government in his philosophical writing, Thoughts from
the Tao–te Ching, where he states that a good government shall not make their people want, they should provide everything that their people need.
He also states that wars cause chaos and a good leader would not wage war and sacrifice his or her people and be moral in their decisions (Tzu 19).
In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson lists his grievances against King George III. The first of these grievances is that King George
refused to

The Declaration Of Independence: Most Pivotal Document...
The Declaration of Independence was perhaps the most pivotal document ever written in American history. In 1776, the second Constitutional
Convention met to adopt this bold statement. The most famous portion is the opening, which lays out the foundations of the founding fathers'
philosophy. But much longer is the list of misdeeds that King George had committed upon the colonies. One egregious action that the Declaration
attributes to George is this: "He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness of his invasions on the rights of the
people." This, it could be argued, is one action that sums up what the colonists were angry about, and what they set out to fix. The Constitution, another
of the most important

The Boston Tea Party and AmericaвЂ™s Independence Essay
The Boston Tea Party and America's Independence
Throughout the course of history there have been many events leading up to the independence of America. Some of them were small, whereas others
were much more significant. One of the more important events was the Boston Tea Party. This was when the colonists, in anger, boarded a ship
carrying many chests of fine teas, and hurled them overboard. The Boston Tea Party marked the first act of open resistance toBritish rule. The Boston
Tea Party alone was not the main event that brought America her independence. However it was the larger of many little things that led up to the
revolutionary war. For example, if there would never have been a Tea Tax, then there never would have been the need... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They would then proceed to tear open the chests of tea and dump them overboard. That Sunday night, December 16th, 1773, the plan was put into
action. It worked just as they had wanted it to. The near hundred men, all dressed as Indians, boarded the ship and with their tomahawks, they broke
the chests of tea open and succeeded in dumping 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor. This was later named The Boston Tea Party, but for the
British it was called a disaster.
As soon as King George III heard of the tea party, he was furious. In 1774, the British government passed many laws in order to punish the colonists
for their act of rebellion. Some people called these laws the Punitive Acts, and some called them the Coercive Acts. However to most, they were
known as the Intolerable Acts. There were five Intolerable Acts all together. The first of these was called the Boston Port Act. This law closed down
the Boston port until the East India Company was reimbursed for the tea that was ruined in the Boston Harbor. This upset the people greatly, since
this was the only port in Boston and the people of Boston thrived on commerce. The bad thing about this law was that it punished the innocent as well
as the guilty. The second of the laws was a modification to the Massachusetts charter of 1691. It took away many of the rights of self–government that
the province had enjoyed. The third measure stated that the British

John R. Bisland Research Paper
John and Fannie are still property owners and presumably still at Aragon. John R. Bisland is listed as a Manufacturer of Sugar in the US IRS Tax
Assessment List for Division 21, dated January 1867. William Alexander Bisland left Hope Farm and was at Mount Repose in Natchez. The 1870
Census of Natchez, Adams County, Mississippi shows William A., age 43, and family living with his mother, Mary L.L. Bisland; his sister, Lenora,
and several other family members. The next entry on this census is another sister, Jane Lambdin and her family. The 1870 Census of Terrebonne lists
Thomas, age 35; Margaret, age 30; children: Mary (known as Mollie), age 11; Lydia (Elizabeth– perhaps reported as Lizzy), age 9; Thomas, age 6;
Lensin (Lenox), age 2; and Margaret, age 1. Thomas is listed as a Farmer. Note that Guy is not reported in this listing. There is no further mention of
Guy other than the above referenced letters, and it is presumed that he died as an infant between 1862 and 1864.24, 32 Thomas and family have
obviously left Fairfax Plantation in St. Mary and are now living at Hope Farm.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is plausible that both are correct. In addition to this census documentation, evidence that Hope Farm was still home for this branch of the Bisland
family is found in the passport application of youngest daughter, Margaret Watts Bisland on May 20, 1920. "I solemnly swear that I was born at Hope
Farm–Bayou Terrebonne, in the State of Louisiana, on or about 24th day of April, 1870, that my father, Thomas S. Bisland was born in the United
States of America and is now

Comparative Essay On The American And French Revolutions
3.1 Short Paper: Comparative Essay on the American and French Revolutions
1.) Why does the United States come out its revolution with a republic instead of a monarchy? Why do the French wind up with an Emperor
Napoleon but the United States does not have a King George of the House of Washington? There are moments in our history where the citizens of the
world stand up and for their beliefs, their honor, and themselves. They come together to reform the existing government that is holding them back from
achieving their desired lifestyle. When this occurs, most likely, war is inevitable to follow. When war comes to a country, death and destruction is
destined. Leaders and rules change, but the pride of its citizens prevails and becomes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When that monarchy went against the colonists, and regarded them a part of the empire, this was not entirely how the colonist's wished to identify
themselves. America and its colonists wished to establish themselves as being independent from a monarchy and to have a say in how they were ruled.
After the revolution was over, Washington went back to Mount Vernon to retire, or so he thought.
When Washington was asked by his fellow founding fathers to become the new King of theUnited States, his reaction must have been priceless. After
fighting the revolution for many long hard years, to get away from a monarchy, and now they wanted to create another one. Washington had his
reasons why he did not wish to be king because, "He was driven by Ameri–can nationalism years before independence was declared, and for eight long
years after 1775 he sacrificed as a soldier to bring the American naВ¬tion into being. He emerged from retirement to search for a means of safeguarding
a national Union imperiled by sectionalists and localists, and with considerable misgivings he agreed to take on the presidency in an attempt to
establish an energetic national government and a robust and truly independent United States." Washington did not wish to be King, he wished to have
what he fought in the revolution for, a government that was governed by the people not a monarch. America's founding fathers, were at the helm of the

Queen Nzinga During The 1500's
Queen Nzinga was believed to be born during the last half of the 1500's. During her early life, she grew up with her father as a leader. Her father
Ngola Kiluanji Kia Samba was a ruler before her. He started his ruling by leading his people against Portuguese colonialists. Queen Nzinga Mbande
was the monarch in Mbundu people. She became the queen when her brother committed suicide. During that time there was rising demand for the
slave trade. She always refused to allow anybody to control her nation. This lead to tons of struggles throughout the 16th century. Though she had no
formal education she was a great leader. This was because during this time there was some enlightenment in the education field in England but none
in Africa. In 1626 Nzinga's brother had died. Some believe it was suicide because of strong people from Portugal. The king was said to have sent
Nzinga to negotiate a peace treaty with Portugal. Portugal did not agree with these terms, then King Ngola committed suicide. Leaving Nzinga to
become the queen. Following this time Ndongo was being attacked by Portugal and other African enemies. She decided she wanted the peace treaty to
go... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is because of the source of slaves along the West African coast. Making them look for new areas. Soon in 1580, they made a trading
relationship with Angola. Later in 1617, the Portuguese had established a settlement at Luanda. They kept exploring closer to the Mbundu land.
Nzinga knew of everything that had happened in Congo. She also realized that if she refused to trade with them it could remove other potential
allies from her own land. After they knew the allies would cease to exist they had several fights and disagreements with Portugal and the Portuguese
people she fought them and ended up losing. Despite this, she was not captured or killed she died of most likely old age. She died at the age of 80 on
December 17,

Essay On Major Impacts Of The American Revolution

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Mary Burg

More from Mary Burg (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Major Impacts Of The American Revolution