The Battle Of Command During Battle: Confusion Of Roles

The Battle Of Command During Battle
A major hurdle was thus the war was being fought in foreign terrains and as such, the soldiers had to adapt and learn quickly how to navigate and
combat in new grounds. Proper training is also essential for defining roles and functions for each member of the troops to ensure efficiency and
effectiveness of the entire units. Confusion of formations and chain of command during battle can be devastating to any unit. Uniformity is crucial in
minimizing losses and the number of casualties in battlefields. Similarly, it is neccesary to avoid conflict of interest among soldiers of the same troop
and with allies. This war being a collaborative battle among allies thus required the highest level of collaboration and cooperation. Proper training was
thus important to ensure that all troops worked and operated as cohesive units.
Motivation is crucial in the success of any operation whether economical or military. Workers and in this case soldiers are thus required to be fully
committed to the cause and motivated to work for certain incentives for their service. Remunerations aren't enough to fully motivate a soldier into
engaging in life threatening battles. The political class was thus similarly influential ion offering the servicemen proper incentives to ensure that they
were motivated to perform the duties assigned to them despite the obvious risks and hardships that they would incur. American soldiers were largely
motivated to participate in the war because of the promises that
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Battle Analysis : Battle Of Trenton
Battle Analysis: Battle of Trenton
The Battle of Trenton is widely regarded as a turning point in the American Revolutionary War. With enlistments in the Continental Army about to
expire at the end of the year, General George Washington risked everything in harsh winter conditions to advance across the Delaware River and
execute a surprise attack on Hessian troops in Trenton, N.J. An evaluation of the moments that led up to the battle, the setting, area of operations, the
Continental and Opposing forces, along with the use of intelligence will reveal the major factors that led to the outcome of the battle. An analysis of the
battle will illustrate how Washington devised an offensive plan that demonstrated many of the principles of war still utilized in military operations today.
Setting
The Battle of Trenton occurred approximately 20 months after the revolution started. On November 16, 1776, the Battle of Fort Washington marked a
decisive victory for the British. The British forces killed 59 Continental soldiers and took another 2,837 prisoner ("Weapons and war," n.d.). Due to the
defeat, Continental soldiers retreated across New Jersey into Pennsylvania. The Continental Army did not suffer any losses, but the troops suffered from
a sense of defeat. Washington and his men faced a cold winter ahead, they were not sufficiently equipped to survive, enlistment contracts neared the
end, local militants refused to take up arms, and the Continental Congress abandoned the

How Kubrick Directs Battles
How Kubrick Directs Battles
Paths of Glory focuses on the ego and politics of war, however it's battle scene is important in framing the last half of the film. Kubrick used his
skills in photography and directing to create a different take on the battle scene. The scene is shot in a starker and more meticulous manner than what
is typically depicted. Kubrick needed to set up a tone in this scene to allow the viewer to be more engaged with the dark topics the film brings up. By
breaking apart the choices Kubrick made for each element in the battle and how it relates to the rest of the film as well as Kubrick's other films, the
ideas that are trying to convey can be seen. The attack on the "Anthill" is the set–up in Paths of Glory to the rest of the film. It establishes General
Mireau as being the antagonist and Colonel Dax as the protagonist. It also is used as a way to show the reasons why the soldiers retreated from no
man's land, or even refused to leave the trenches. It's important that the viewer agrees with the soldiers decision to not follow orders by depicting the
battle to be as unnatural and illogical as possible. Every part of the battle scene such as the characters, the cinematography, and the sound design is
used to build up this perspective for the viewer. The battles in Kubrick films are always small in scope, they focus on the individuals rather than a
military as a whole. This translates to how these scenes are shot with the camera following a certain

The Battle Of Trenton And The Battle Of Saratoga
The battle of Trenton and the battle of Saratoga brought a crucial victory to the Continental Army, but the battle of Trenton improved morale in the
patriots more so than the battle of Saratoga did. The battle of Trenton proved to be significant by ultimately turning the tide of the conflict in their
favor, improving morale and hope for the war.
For instance, The battle of Trenton on Christmas Eve in 1776 proved the colonist were dedicated and a capable force. The colonists were wary about
fighting the very powerful Hessian, therefore on Christmas Eve, they planned a sneak attack to defeat them. The patriots marched and fought in icy and
poor conditions before dawn, hoping to defeat the powerful Hessians. After the surprise attack the Colonists had totaled 2 dead and 5 wounded. The
Hessians had 22 dead and 90 wounded and 918 captured. This victory would change the image of the colonist's army and bring about great change.
After the battle of Trenton, they were now viewed as a definite threat to the British. On the other hand, the battle of Saratoga gave the colonist hope for
the upcoming battles. On October 17th,1777 the colonist surrounded General Burgoyne and his army continue to hold strong, the army fought until the
British surrendered to the colonist. This was significant for the colonist because the British surrendered to the colonist. This showed the British that the
colonist held up a good fight and that this war was going to be long and hard. In conclusion, this

The Battle Of The Somme
Quetext
About Widget FAQ Contact
How was the Battle of the Somme significant to the British in World War 1? The Battle of the Somme was significant to the British in World War 1
because the British started and ended the battle, there were horrific casualties as a result of this Battle and it led to many lessons being learnt. The
Battle was started by the British on the 1st July 1916 and ended on the 18th November 1916. Throughout the Battle, many smaller battles took place
the most significant being day Z. The death toll was very high and many lessons were learnt from the Battle. The battle of the Somme was started by the
British on the 1st of July 1916 at 7:30 am (Johnson, 2016). The plan developed by the British involved the British army (BEF) attacking the Germans
along a 15 mile front north of the Somme and the French army to attacking the Germans along an 8 mile front. They planned a weeklong
bombardment on the German trenches which would use a total of 1.7 million shells (Johnson, 2016). The plan was developed in hope to relieve the
French army fighting at Verdun with the Germans. Two other goals were to destroy German's reserve power and inflict heavy losses on the German
army. Throughout the Battle, many important events occurred. The most gruesome day was the first day also known as day Z which led to disaster
on the British side. From here there were a series of smaller attacks in preparation for a large scale assault on the 4th of July (BBC, 2016). This attack

The Battle Of Antietam : The Bloodiest Battle
The Battle of Antietam is the bloodiest battle in American history. On September 17, 1862, approximately 22,720 soldiers were either killed, wounded,
or missing after the gruesome fight. This battle halted the Confederate general's drive through Maryland and caused General Lee to withdraw into
Virginia. Although contributed as a Union victory, since the Confederates withdrew south of the Potomac River, McClellan loss his chance at
dismantling Lee's Army. General McClellan's usual hesitation allowed General Lee to withdraw uninterrupted. In the three months before theBattle of
Antietam, the Confederate Army had gained momentum throughout the war in the East. With excellent moral throughout his unit, Lee crossed the
Potomac River with his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The site chosen by Lee had many advantages for his military. The terrain provided his troops cover behind fences and limestone. Furthermore, the
woods and swales allowed men to maneuver around the enemy without behind seen. Antietam creek flowed between the Confederate and Union
armies. If the Army of the Potomac were to attack, they would have to cross one of the three stone bridges. The only disadvantage to Lee was the
single escape route. Since the Potomac River blocked the Confederate rear with only one crossing point, Lee did not have a great retreat plan.
General Lee divided his Army into the right and left wings commanded by Major General James Longstreet and Major General Thomas J. Jackson
respectively. Each wing guarded their respective flank. In the north, General Jones' and General Hood's divisions would eventually fight Gibbon's Iron
Brigade.
Gibbon had fought under Burnside just three days before the Battle of Antietam at the Battle of South Mountain. The result of the battle was a loss
318 men: 37 killed, 251 wounded, and 30 missing. However, these losses did not dishearten his troops as they were able to hold their ground and push
back Confederate troops at South Mountain. After arriving at Antietam, Gibbon fell back under Doubleday's First Division. Since General McClellan
did not know the disposition of Confederate forces, he remained cautious and did not attack

The Battle At The Somme Analysis
Stephanie Mulowayi
HIST 101
Dr. Kreider
Keegan Paper
War through the Ages: Waterloo & Somme One hundred years separated the Battle at Waterloo and the Battle at the Somme, and despite that time gap
certain social and military aspects have been able transcend time. John Keegan's The Face of Battle, detailed the experiences of both battles from a
British perspective. Within that one hundred year span many facets of war changed, the tactics, the machinery, the tools, the soldiers and the very cause
of the battle itself. Despite the stark contrasts of each, it was the similarities in experience and tactics that were truly striking. When analyzing both
battles careful, it became apparent the parallels of war despite time, location and societal factors.
Like many events in history, a battle is very telling about the society it took place in. This idea rang true during the Battle of the Somme, happening in
the midst of World War I, July 1916. The British, aligned with the other Allies were set to take on the Germans. According to Keegan, "the French and
British had been planning a great offensive ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A brigade of men would then leave their front trenches and advance to the German line across no–man's land. They would expect to find the wire
destroyed or gaped, then be able to pass through, jump into the German trenches, kill anyone who would try to stop them and take control. Then the
wave of reserves would pass and capture in a similar way. Unfortunately the Germans were underestimated. As the British were already crossing
no–man's land, the Germans began spraying them with machine gun bullets–the British never saw it coming. Some battalions were able to get through
and others were able to find gaps in the German wire, but ultimately the Germans were able to recapture most of the land causing the British a
devastating amount of

Battle Analysis : Battle Of Chancellorsville
Battle Analysis: Battle of Chancellorsville
During the American Civil War, influential leaders and proven commanders were among the most valuable assets in battle. Such was the case of
Confederate Army Lieutenant General (LTG) Thomas Jackson. LTG Jackson was well known for his uncanny ability to detect and exploit an enemy's
weak spot, resulting in many battle successes. This paper will identify an alternate outcome to the Battle of Chancellorsville: Day 2. The Battle of
Chancellorsville was a great success for the Confederate Army and LTG Jackson's famous flanking maneuver was one of the greatest tactical
maneuvers of the American Civil War. This paper will hypothesize that if LTG Jackson used intelligence officers and/or a reconnaissance team during
the Battle of Chancellorsville, he would have continued the assault destroying the Army of the Potomac. As a result, this would have brought the
ending of the American Civil War.
Strategic and Operational Overview
The American Civil War began in 1861 in order to determine if the United States was to be a confederation of sovereign states or a nation with a
sovereign national government. The war would also decide whether slavery would continue to exist in the United States. The American Civil War is
recognized as the costliest war ever fought on American soil as it resulted in over 620,000 Soldiers killed (American Civil War History, 2009). The
election of Republican President Abraham Lincoln was the catalyst for the

The Gettysburg Battle : The Battle Of Gettysburg
On July 1–3, 1863 in the town of Gettysburg Pennsylvania, Confederate and Union armies compile 50,000 a causalities in what would be the
deadliest battle of the Civil War and American History. Major General George Meade of the Union Army of the Potomac and General Robert E. Lee
of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia turning point of the Civil War with a decisive victory of the Union. Costly missed opportunities and
lack of intelligence lead to failure by the Confederate army and Union Army's resilience of defense on the high ground of the Hills of Gettysburg tell
the story of the Battle. Prior to the battle, Both armies recently fought each other recently at the battle of Chancellorsville. Lee victoriously won the
Battle of Chancellorsville against the former command of the Potomac, Major–General Joseph Hooker. Hooker after the loss at Chancellorsville, was
relieved of command By President Lincoln and Gen. George Meade replaced Hooker as the commander of the army of the Potomac(). After
Chancellorsville, Gen. Lee was marching north, to attempt to bring decisive blow and win the war by invading the North. Already in Pennsylvania,
and Meade advanced his new army North to meet Lee. On June 30th, Union General Hill and his corps of the army of the Potomac are west of
Gettysburg, when Confederate Brigadier General Pettigrew is searching for supplies, especially shoes() when they see Brigadier General Buford of the
army advanced. Neither General wanted to fight at

Battle Of Somme Research Thesis
Thesis: Tanks introduced at the Battle of Somme provided higher advantages for battlefield dominance, changed the elements of warfare and started the
world's quest for technological advancement. Cavalry charges long enveloped opposing forces ground forces in previous campaigns. Leaders knew
technology proved the key to success. Dynamics surrounding the battlefield weighed heavy the country's ability to control the tempo of warfare. "The
day tanks appeared on the battlefield changed war forever." Stalemates created by trench warfare forced commanders to strategize their methods of
approach. On the other hand, artillery proved a worthy opponent for forces approaching hostile boarders. Trench warfare created intense methods to
control the battlefield. British forces developed new techniques to attack modern trenches. Tanks developed transport through machine gun fire to
create avenues of approach to impenetrable enemy strongholds. Multitasking this new machinery gained control of the battlefield. Moreover,
Lieutenant Storey's account of tank warfare gives an in–depth account of the capability of these machines. Major C.A. Milward proclaimed in
September of 1916: "We heard from the tank man who had returned, covered with blood and bound up, that he had crawled his tank over the village
and, instead ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Phycological affects emerged as a result of the conflict let alone the actual purpose of tank warfare. More and more soldiers grew weary of armored
machines on the battlefield. "One stared and stared as if one had lost the power of one's

The Battle Of Gettysburg Battle Analysis
Battle of Gettysburg Battle Analysis It is our duty, as soon to be Second Lieutenants in the Army, to learn from history. Learning from mistakes in the
past is necessary to understand the responsibilities we will soon have. The Battle of Gettysburg shows prime examples of the nine principles of war:
Objective, Offensive, Mass, Economy of Force, Maneuver, Unity of Command, Security, Surprise and Simplicity. In themilitary today, we are
overwhelmingly blessed with every asset that we have including technology and monetary resources the list could go on forever but the most
invaluable asset is history. Although all nine principles of war are pertinent to success on the battlefield, only five will be discussed in this analysis.
Objective
"What a cruel thing is war; to separate and destroy families and friends, and mar the purest joys and happiness God has granted us in this world; to
fill our hearts with hatred instead of love for our neighbours, and to devastate the fair face of this beautiful world! I pray that, on this day when only
peace and good–will are preached to mankind, better thoughts may fill the hearts of our enemies and turn them to peace. ... My heart bleeds at the
death of every one of our gallant men."(General Robert E. Lee. 1862) General Robert E. Lee, as renowned as he is for his tactfulness in wartime,
resents war in its entire capacity. That didn't put a strain on his attempt to lead the Confederates' invasion of the Northern States. His objective was to

Battle Analysis
HOW TO WRITE A BATTLE ANALYSIS 1. Purpose.
To provide guidance on writing the battle analysis. 2. Learning Objective. The student must prepare a battle analysis that demonstrates the ability to use
military history to develop critical thinking skills. Focus your analysis on one of the following issues: a. Evaluate the commander 's intent. b. Analyze
one aspect of METT–T. c. Analyze the relationship between fire support and any other element of the battlefield operating systems. d. Evaluate a
specific aspect of combat leadership or troop leading procedures. e. Analyze one element of the battlefield organization (close, deep, or rear). 3.
Task.
a. Select a book(s) and analyze a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, check the Internet for electronic documents on more recent military operations. c. Evaluate the research sources: Finding good sources to
support your study is not easy, despite the large volume of published material. As you gather the research material, evaluate each in terms of its
content and bias. (1) Content: Determine what information the source can give you. Is it relevant to your subject? Will it help you complete your
study? (2) Bias: Decide to what extent the author is subjective or objective in his/her work. Is there a clear bias? If so, what is it? Does the bias make a
difference in your use of the work?
2. REVIEW THE SETTING (Set the Stage): This portion of the battle analysis format establishes the setting for the study. You must have a good
understanding of the strategic, operational, and tactical situations before you can analyze the battle. The level of detail in this portion of the battle
analysis will depend on the purpose of the study and the audience for which it is intended. If the causes of the war and the opponents are well
known, there is little reason to go into great detail. a. Strategic/Operational Overview: (1) Identify the war this Battle is fought in to include the time
frame and locations. (2) Identify the war aims of the principle adversaries. (3) Identify and briefly describe the campaign this battle was part of, if

Battle Of Gettysburg Battle Analysis
The Battle of Gettysburg begins in July 1, 1863 which was the start of the American Civil War the Battle started by accident when General George
Meade (leader of the Union Troops) was pursuing General Robert E Lee (leader of the Confederate Troops), so General Lee concentrated his
Army. The Battle began on Pearson's ridge in Gettysburg Pennsylvania until it reached north of town where the Union eleven Corps led by Richard
Yule joined General Lee's Troops. "Ben Neely emphasized that the most damaging aspect of the weather for this event occurred on July 4, the day
after the battle had ended. Rain fell across the area for most of the day; a total of 1.39 inches. While the wounded still lay on the ground, some may
have felt welcomed by the break in action. Some injured soldiers had still not been recovered from low–lying areas by the Plum Run Creek, which
overflowed its banks. Those stranded near the flood waters, reported a lot of Confederates drowned. An even larger issue that was faced because of
the rain was the retreat attempts made by the Confederate Army on July 4 (tuthill, 2014) Turning now to the principle of the offensive, we can see that
it embodies the idea of seizing and retaining the initiative. That is, even though a clear objective might be assigned, it can only be attained through
aggressive offensive operations... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On the evening of June 29, Meade's Army of the Potomac was encamped in northern Maryland on a line extending roughly from Emmitsburg to
Manchester. On the following day, Meade sent out various dispatches and orders that indicated his knowledge of the enemy's location. Specifically,
Meade knew that the Confederate infantry corps, commanded by generals James Longstreet and A. P. Hill, were at Chambersburg with, in the words
of his assistant adjutant general, "evident disposition to advance from Chambersburg to Gettysburg." He also indicated in the same correspondence that
Richard Ewell's corps was at Carlisle

Battle Of Yorktown : Battle For Yorktown
Battle of Yorktown 1
Running Header: Battle of Yorktown
Pearson Elizabeth
The Battle of Yorktown Battle of Yorktown2 One of the most important battles of the Revolutionary War took place on September 28, 1781, in
Yorktown, Virginia. The Siege of Yorktown was the last battle in the war against Great Britain. Fought between GeneralGeorge Washingtonwith
French aid from General Comte de Rochambeau. With a fleet of over 17,000 French and Continental men against General Lord Charles Cornwallis
and his 9,000 British men (The Battle of Yorktown). Washington and Rochambeau decided that a battle in New York would be too difficult to win.
They agreed to attack Charles Cornwallis while he and his army were stationed in Yorktown, Virginia. Cornwallis was located on a peninsula on the
Chesapeake Bay because, there, he could receive supplies via boat from New York. (Creating America) They were expecting more troops from New
York, but they never arrived. The lack of reinforcements was lucky for General Washington and Rochambeau because Cornwallis had a comparatively
better army; the battle might not have ended the same if the enemy had more troops. (The British Surrender at Yorktown)
Washington and his troops had to march from New York to Virginia. They began their march on August 19. Washington kept their destination a total
secret, sending out fake communications, lying that they were not going to Virginia and that Cornwallis wasn't in any danger. On September 5,
Washington

Why Is The Battle Of Vimy Ridge Significant
The Battle of Vimy Ridge– Significant or not significant?
Johnathan Hua April 14 2016
The Battle of Vimy Ridge is historically significant because a vast amount of people were affected. The battle of Vimy Ridge was a critical battle
during the Allied offensive called the Arras offensive. It was a great Allied victory. It started an unbroken chain of victories for theCanadian Corps. This
essay will be explaining why The Battle of Vimy Ridge is historically significant by having multiple perspectives, many people affected and what
long–lasting consequences occurred.
The Battle of Vimy Ridge was historically significant because there were a wide range of stakeholders that had different perspectives on Vimy Ridge.
Many Canadians thought that it was a great victory for Canada. The Germans thought of it as a draw at best for the Canadians because there wasn't a
breakthrough following the victory. Some historians thought the battle was just a myth created by Canada because the battle occurred on Easter
Monday, giving it religious significance. Historians also believe that it was not a very significant event because no breakthrough occurred after the
battle. They believe that other battles, for example Amiens, were far less known, had more effect on... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One such example of a long–lasting consequence is being related to one the soldiers that were hurt. It would heavily impact you and anyone else
who was related. It could cause depression which could affect you for a very long time. This battle also caused a great change. It was one of the few
victories in 1917 for the allies. It also gave the Canadian Corps a new commander in Sir Arthur Currie. The last commander, Sir Julian Byng got
promoted. Under the command of their new commander, they had an unbreakable chain of victories which was started by their victory at Vimy

The Battle Of The Somme And Waterloo
Sarah Cooper
HIST 101–001
830538724
In "The Face of Battle," John Keegan analyzed the experiences of the individuals involved in the battles of the Somme and Waterloo; he thoroughly
examined the advancements of industrialization in warfare and battle strategy between 1815 and 1916. The industrialization of modern warfare during
the battle of the Somme, while progressive, was very much still in its experimental stages. While the inventions during this time period were later
evolved into much more useful products, it seems as though the organized warfare in Waterloo was much more effective; the soldier's mediocre
training for the Somme was obvious in the chaotic events that occurred. While each battle was disastrous in their own ways, industrialization certainly
improved means of warfare and the experience that the soldiers had.
The warfare in Waterloo consisted primarily of rifles, swords, cavalry, andartillery; these weapons were most effective close range which resulted in
the French and British being in close proximity to one another. With immense amounts of training, a variety of battle tactics and formations, the square
was ultimately the most effective. However, despite being located a short distance away from the enemy, thick, black smoke obstructed the soldiers'
vision on both sides of the battlefield, creating a less than optimal battle conditions. Due to the lack of effectiveness of their weapons, success in
Waterloo often depended on the experience of the

The Battle Of The Bulge
Battle of the Bulge
The United States remains a country with a rich history in several issues including strong military activities including their incursion in Iraq,
Afghanistan and other volatile countries around the world. However, the devastations of the Battle of the Bulge make it as one of the deadliest and
bloodiest wars that the U.S has ever witnessed in history. It led to various war tactics with artillery emerging from it and other military operation
challenges. Despite its unpredictable nature and the large casualties that it realized on the side of the Americans, it positively contributed to various
efficient military operations in the contemporary war battles like those taking place in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan among other places globally.
Therefore, this essay purposefully discusses the history and outcome of the role of artillery in the Battle of the Bulge and how it relates to the evolution
of the contemporary military operation.
The Battle of the Bulge is construed as a double war where the combatants not only fought themselves on the battleground but also the cold winter
weather at the time. The war that pitted American soldiers against German commandos under the control of the Adolf Hitler a German chancellor at the
time had neither a clear winner nor clear agenda hence setting the stage for the war. Political commentators contend that the U.S and the Germans were
fighting over global supremacy and not a common enemy. For instance, while the

Battle Of San Jacinto Battle Analysis
The Battle of San Jacinto is an interesting event for evaluation through battle analysis. Although fought between the independent country of Texas and
Mexico, it has been adopted into the psyche of U.S. History as a major battle that has a significant contribution to the general history of the U.S. Much
like the Alamo, the Battle of San Jacinto relied heavily on imported forces from varying places throughout the U.S. to supplement Texas troops, making
the interwoven nature of the Texas battle in U.S. history logical. The Battle of San Jacinto has been selected for a battle analysis due to its
prominence in U.S. history, but also because of a heightened level of bias that often appears in the re–telling of the narrative of this battle. One

Battle : A History Of Combat And Culture
Comparative Book review
John Lynn, Battle: A History of Combat and Culture (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2003)
Victor Davis Hanson, Carnage, and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power (New York: Doubleday, 2001)
Victor Davis Hanson is a former classics professor, an Americanmilitary historian, a scholar of ancient warfare and a columnist. He graduated from
Selma High School, he also received a BA from the University of California in 1975 and later got his Ph.D. in Classics from Stanford University.
His rich education background and experience, therefore, qualifies him for his work especially his book: Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles
in the Rise of Western Power. In the book, Victor Hanson intends to shed light on the predominance of the western military as attributed to the
western Hellenic culture as well as its legacies. John Lynn is a history professor at the University of Illinois; he is also an adjunct professor at Ohio
State University. Born in 1943, he received his degree in Bachelor of Arts at University of Illinois. He then attained his Master's degree in Art at the
University of California and later his Ph.D. at UCLA. Like Victor Hanson, John Lynn is also a military historian focusing of the ancient western
military power. The professor is well known for his book Battle: A History ofCombat and Culture published in 2003. In the book, John Lynn seeks to
oppose the universal approaches to interpreting warfare.
Victor Hanson in his book tries to

Battle Of Crete : The Battle For Crete
Battle for Crete
Introduction
The battle of Crete occurred due to various causes and consequences including the enormous demand on the island by both the allies and the Axis.
The battle began just after dawn on 20 May 1941. The air above was filled with parachutes as thousands of trained elite German Para troops began
to drop from the skies. This was the beginning of the Battle for Crete. For 12 intense days the allies, New Zealanders, British, Australian and Greek
troops, assisted by Cretan civilians, tried to fend off a huge airborne attack by the Axis. They were almost successful. Many New Zealanders made it
off Crete, but thousands were left behind. The Cretans and the New Zealanders still remember this significant battle in New Zealand history.
Causes of the Battle for Crete
Crete's strategic importance
The most important cause of the battle of Crete was the importance of Crete along with king George of Greece and his entourage. The retreat from
Greece involved retreating from the Germans and Italians who were pursuing the allies, the allies then retreated to the island of Crete which was
defendable with the right amount of soldiers. The island of Crete needed to be defended from the axis just as much as the axis wanted the island.
The island of Crete was wanted by the allies as the island contained two airfields which allowed the short ranged planes that were used during world
war 2 to reach the Romanian oilfields and bomb them successfully. The largest refinery in

Battle Of The Bulge: The Battle Of George S.
Early on the misty winter morning of Dec. 16, 1944, more than 200,000 German troops and nearly 1,000 tanks launched Adolf Hitler's last bid to
reverse the flow out/decline/get worse fortunes that had begun when allied troops landed in France on D–Day. Trying to drive to the coast of the
English Channel and split the allied armies as they had done in May 1940, the Germans struck in the Ardennes Forest, a 75–mile stretch of the front
seen as dense woods and few roads, held by four inexperienced and fight–worn American divisions placed/assigned therefor rest and seasoning. After a
day of hard fighting, the Germans broke through the American front, surrounding most ofan infantry division, grabbing and taking control of key
crossroads, and advancing their starts and leads toward the Meuse River, creating the projection that gave the fight its name.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The most powerful/ anything els) Allied commander, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower rushed strengthening items/rewards/supplies to hold the shoulders
of the German penetration. Within days, Lt. Gen. George S. Patton Jr. had turned his Third U.S. Army to the north and was attacking (in response to
an attack) against the German flank. But the story of the Battle of the Bulge is above all the story of American Soldiers. Often separated far from
others and unaware of the overall picture, they did their part to slow the Nazi advance, whether by delaying (protected by metal or another covering)
starts and leads with stubborn defenses of very important crossroads, moving or burning critical gasoline stocks to keep them from the fuel–hungry
German tanks, or coming up with questions on not well known to stump possible Nazi

Battle Analysis Methodology : The Battle Of Fredericksburg
Battle Analysis Methodology
The Battle of Fredericksburg took place between December 11–15, in and around Fredericksburg, Virginia. General Robert E. Lee commanded the
confederate Army of Northern Virginia, while the opposition forces of the Union Army of the Potomac, were commanded by Major GeneralAmbrose
Burnside. The battle stemmed from a need for the Union Army to demonstrate some success in the war effort. The Northern public was currently
losing confidence in Lincoln and his ability to win the war. Lincoln had replaced several of his top Generals in order to thwart the recent advances of
the Confederate Army, which made significant advances during the fall. The battle is remembered as one of the most one–sided battles in the history
of the war, being that the Union casualties would amount to more than three times that of the Confederates. When looking at the methodology Major
General Burnside used to stage his troops and prepare his attack, we can assess why the number of casualties far surpassed that of the Confederates.
Preparation, equipment, time and execution were the main factors which attributed to the failed campaign, ending with the withdrawal of the Union
troops on December 15, 1862. The plan initially went awry after Burnside and his troops arrived to the Rappahannock and there were no pontoon
bridges to cross the river, which were only requisitioned for 10 days prior. The equipment would eventually arrive two weeks later, giving General Lee

Battle Of Stalingrad Battle Analysis
The victory for the Red Army at the Battle of Kursk had marked a change in World War II where the German Wehrmacht's use of blitzkrieg had finally
been destroyed. This study consolidates why the battle happened and its overall outcome. Synthesizing both what the German command believed to be
failures, and its antithesis, the Soviet success, the assault on Kursk will be understood through not only the immediate triumph, but specifically how the
Soviet Union changed the direction of the Eastern Front. The Battle of Stalingrad was a defining moment during the Eastern Front as it was a large
scale battle in which the Wehrmacht suffered great casualties and lost initiative. Operation Uranus, Chief of the General Staff, A. M. Vasilevsky's plan
to encircle the Sixth German Army at Stalingrad, forced German Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus to surrender and gave Field Marshal Marshal von
Manstein command of the surviving Axis forces. Although von... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This plan was so important that Hitler canceled operations Habicht and Panther which were designed to push Soviet forces beyond the industrial
zone of the Donets River. He wanted nothing that would take resources away from the attack at Kursk. On 15 April, Order 6 was issued which
further specified the attack, and gave clear instructions to be ready any six days in advance for the attack. Other points in Order 6 maintain that
"The attack forces are concentrated on a narrow axis, in order to provide local overwhelming superiority," or that the enemy "will be given no respite
and will be destroyed by prompt compression of the pocket." Operation Citadel was intended to be a quick attack which would launch directly after the
rainy season in hopes of fighting an unprepared Soviet

Battle Of Gettysburg Battle Analysis
After his victory at the Battle of Chancellorsville, Virginia, in May 1863, Robert E. led his Army of Northern Virginia into its second invasion of the
North. Lee planned to accrue supplies in the prosperous Pennsylvania farmland, and take the fighting away from a war–torn Virginia. He wanted to
bring the war to Northern cities so they could experience the war first hand. the hope behind this reasoning is that he could weaken the North's desire
for war; thus, strengthening the North`s desire for peace. Urged by President Abraham Lincoln, Maj. Gen. Joseph Hooker moved his Union Army of the
Potomac in pursuit of Lee`s army, but Hooker was relieved of command just three days before the battle. Hooker's successor, Maj. Gen. George Meade
moved northward, keeping his army between Lee`s and Washington, D.C. When Lee learned that Meade was in Pennsylvania, he concerted his
confederate army around the city of Gettysburg.
The two armies collided west and north of the town on July 1, 1863. Union cavalry led by Brig. Gen. John Buford slowed the Confederate advance
until Union infantry, the Union 1st and 11th Corps, could arrive. More Confederate reinforcements under generals A.P. Hill and Richard Ewell
eventually reached the scene, however, and the 30,000 Confederate soldiers ultimately defeated the Union`s 20,000. The ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Confederates were wrapped around the Union position with 70,000 soldiers. On the afternoon of July 2, 1863, Lee launched a heavy assault on the
Union`s left flank, and the fierce fighting at the areas of Devil's Den, Little Round Top, the Wheatfield, the Peach Orchard and Cemetery Ridge began
to rage . On the Union right, the severity of the attack intensified into full–scale assaults on Culp's Hill as well as East Cemetery Hill. Although the
Confederates had gained ground, the Union still defended strong positions at the end of the

Battle Of Fromelles
BATTLE OF FROMELLES Harrison Wagg WW1 Great Moments May 2016 What Happened? The Battle of Fromelles was one of the most
disasters battles in World War 1. It was British military operation which involved Australia's 5th division, Britain's 61st division and Germany's 6th
Bavarian Division and two flanking divisions. The commander for Germany was Gustav Scanzoni von Lichenfels and the commander for Britain
was Richard Haking. The Battle of Fromelles was a British Military operation to stop the strong Germany 6th division from travelling south to where
the British had a strong 4th division . The plan was a feint to send the British 61st division and the Australian 5th division to try weaken the German
army. The Battle of Fromelles took place in North of France in the town of Fromelles, Nord on the 19th of April 1916. "I have been through the mill
and came out without a mark... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Resonance How much emotion did this battle cause people to feel at the time? How much emotion do some people feel about it today? What are
the reasons for that? The Battle of Fromelles was a horrific battle which didn't help prevent the Battle of Somme. All the battle had done was make
people very scared and worried about the Germans. The people who were majorly effected by this were the French British and Australia. The 5th
Australian Division suffered 5,533 casualties, 1,547 61st British Division casualties and little less then 1,000 casualties for the Germans. This year
is the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Fromelles. People still remember the soldiers that fought in the battle and lost their lives. It was one of the
most horrific battles in WW1 and is a good example for people today to see why war is so terrible. The reasons they may think this because of all the
casualties, how Britain's plan went horrible wrong and achieved nothing. Revealing How does this battle help us understand other aspects of the

Battle Of Thermopylae Battle Analysis
The Battle of Thermopylae, perhaps one of the most well–known ancient battles in history, has been written about many times since event first
occurred thousands of years ago. Gates of Fire by Steven Pressfield, however, puts a unique spin on it. Pressfield covers not only the battle, but the
Spartans that made up the battle. He gives an in–depth view of what he thinks Spartans really were like. The character and values that Spartans hold
dear is described in great detail. The Spartans are described in the usual way. They are fearless, religious, and hold their virtues to a very high
standard. Pressfield shows their fearlessness in several ways. First, the Spartans are going to a battle, and a child no more than 12 years old sneaks off
to participate in the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Gates of Fire" explains that the messes and battle drills are used to teach the kids very important aspects of being the best Spartan. Pressfield also
stressed the brevity that the Spartan warriors possess. The Spartans did not give any long speeches, and several Spartans would only consider talking
if they believed it would help their younger Spartan in training. Several times a character would stop talking if he believed he had rambled too far
away from the message. The Spartan culture is a part of the Spartan legend as much as the Spartiates themselves. Many beliefs and habits can be used
to describe the culture of Sparta. Pressfield describes the "agoge", the training for the young Spartan children, and how brutal and harsh it can be. This
training however, is an essential part of Sparta. Without this, the Spartiates wouldn't possess all these virtues. The brotherhood that the Spartiates share
with one another is also described. By battling, the men form a close bond with one another that allows Spartans to engage each other so casually.***
The messes of the men are another element that adds to the Spartan culture. The messes are the source of much bonding and mental training for the
younger

The Battle Of The War Essay
A battle, rather a war, has many important factors that lead to it. Likewise during a war there are a variety of essential utilities used such as weapons,
leadership, tactics, and numbers. What might not come to mind is the object that provided shelter, break time, medical care and more. The forts during
the Civil War provided all of these things as they were the home away from home for soldiers. After experiencing all mother nature has to offer
shelter was often all a soldier could want. Rest and relaxation are necessary for anyone to get through the day and as a soldier a little time to
yourself would make a huge difference on the battlefield. Some of the greatest battles of the Civil War were fought at the forts and to this day they
are a symbol of the battles fought. What the forts provided to soldiers would seem minor to some today, but in a war thebattle is not always won
through the big guns, heavy artillery, and sheer number. The insignificant things tend to make the big difference because they end of effecting the big
picture as much as the most thought of was of winning. During the American Civil Warthe forts were of great significance because of the shelter they
provided, leisure time, and their service as a battlefield.
The forts provided one of the three basic needs in life by granting shelter for the soldiers who often had to withstand the elements leading them to
contest against sickness and was a boost in their overall attitude throughout their journeys.

The Battle Of Trenton : A Critical Battle
The Battle of Trenton was a critical battle that took place on 26 December 1776, during the early years of the American Revolutionary War. The battle
took place in the township of Trenton, New Jersey between the Continental Army, personally led by Commander–in–Chief, General (GEN) George
Washington, and the British contracted Hessian Army, led by Colonel (COL) Johann Rahl. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2013) states that the
Battle of Trenton served as the first major American victory in the Revolutionary war. Prior to the Battle of Trenton, American forces had endured
nearly constant defeat as the British pushed them from New York and into Pennsylvania. The Continental Congress pleaded for a victory to save the
cause. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First and foremost, Washington chose to strike during the heart of winter at a time when most British forces were disengaged from the war effort due
to harsh conditions and a perceived sense of inevitable victory. Additionally, the patriots utilized the element of surprise, by initiating the assault on
Christmas night under the cover of darkness and during the middle of a fierce winter snow storm. Washington had purposely released information to
British and Hessian forces through double agent operations, which solidified their beliefs that the Continental Army was incapable of launching a strike.
The Hessian commander had even received notification from a British spy imbedded within the Continental Army, that an attack was imminent. The
Hessian dismissed the importance of the spy's written report and neglected to read it. Also, it was unknown at the time, but later suspected that the
Hessian Army was in a state of inebriation, as a result of Christmas festivities. All of these factors in addition to a lack of consideration by the Hessians
for intelligence information set the stage for an American victory.
Following being driven out of New York City to the west bank of the Delaware River by British forces during the summer of 1776, American forces
were suffering from the effects of physical and psychological defeat. The American army was on the cusp of falling apart all together. In addition to this

Monte Cassino Battle
The attack on Monte Cassino was a bloody affair and one that was dubbed the Stalingrad of the Italian front. The battle saw a plethora of high
explosives exchanged between the Allied and Axis forces of World War Two. Polish forces had one unlikely war hero on their side, a Syrian brown
bear named Wojtek, which translates in Slavik to, "he who loves war". He was essential in moving ammunition for the Polish 22ndArtillery Supply
Company during the Battle of Monte Cassino, which allowed them to continue to bombard Axis forces within the city while boosting the morale of
friendly forces engaged in the deadly battle. This essay will continue to address the history and outcome of the Battle of Monte Cassino, the evolution
and contribution provided ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Today's military still utilizes the attack and defensive techniques presented in this battle by the Allied and Axis forces. It is also important to take away
the role that Wojtek played, and how a simple solution to a difficult problem can vastly change the tactics, techniques and procedures of a military force
in future operations. One of the most valuable tools to understand is how to use and implement the lessons learned process to improve and dominate
future military operations. As the fires community moves forward it should continue to understand the role that it plays to shape offensive and
defensive operations, either in a standalone method or as part of a joint attack to control the ground force commander's

Essay On The Battle Of Chipyong-Nin
The Battle of Chipyong–ni was a decisive battle during the Korean War and the first major victory following the entry of the Chinese into the war.
COL Freeman employed the following principles of mission command during the battle of Chipyong–ni: build cohesive teams through mutual trust, use
of mission orders, exercise disciplined initiative, and accept prudent risk. He was an outstanding leader who knew the value of good communication
with his unit. He led by example, and fostered a climate that allowed his subordinates to excel.
The battle of Chipyong–ni took place from 13–15 February 1951, in the small road hub and railway town of the same name1. The 8th Army
Commander, General Ridgeway, determined that it was a key location to keep the Chinese from moving farther south to stabilize the UN front2. COL
Paul Freeman, who would later become a four–star general, commanded the 23rd Infantry Regiment3. The unit recently won the battle of Twin Tunnels
several miles south. "Freeman's mission was to deny the enemy the use of the road net and hold the area" of Chipyong–ni4. Over the course of three
long nights the Soldiers of the 23rd infantry regiment held back an overwhelming Chinese force, estimates from after the battle believe that there were
six Chinese Communist Force (CCF) Divisions5. COL Paul Freeman had a long history of military experience in Asia, to which many attribute much
of his success during this battle. As the son of a military doctor, he grew up in

Battle of Stalingrad
The Battle of Stalingrad
Explain why one event during World War Two in Europe was a turning point in the conflict
The Battle of Stalingrad in 1942 was one of the major turning points in World War Two. It was a major turning point for a number of reasons, the first
being that Germany lost considerable amounts of manpower and equipment in this battle; losses from which they never recovered. In addition, the
Battle of Stalingrad had a sizeable effect on the German's and the Allies moral that ultimately led to Nazi Germany's downfall. Moreover, the Battle of
Stalingrad stopped the German advance into Russia, denying them access to the Caucasus oil wells, exacerbating Germany's fuel crisis and crippling
the German army. Finally, the Battle... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They were relying on the capture of the Russian oil fields to supply their army with fuel after their stockpiles had run out. Their lack of fuel is evident
even in this battle as Friedrich Von Paulus, who was commanding the sixth army's assault on Stalingrad, advance towards the city was very slow due
to the fuel rations and at one point his army was even brought to a complete halt outside Kalach, as they had completely exhausted their fuel supply.
The outcome of the Battle of Stalingrad exacerbated the Germans shortage of fuel, limiting the vital supply for their planes and tanks. Without fuel, the
German panzer tanks and the mighty German Luftwaffe would be useless, thus rendering two of Germany's greatest assets worthless. The Germans
could not win the war without a reliable source of fuel. Therefore, the Battle of Stalingrad was a turning point in World War Two because it stopped the
German advance into Russian thus denying them access to the Caucasus oil wells, exacerbating Germany's fuel crisis and crippling the German army.
In addition, the Battle of Stalingrad also caused great political unrest in Germany, causing many to question Hitler's leadership. Hitler had the
opportunity to withdraw his numerous troops after they were surrounded by the Russian army. However, against his Generals' advice, he chose to let
them die for so called 'Glory'. Von Paulus radioed Hitler desperately informing

The Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of Normandy Essay
The Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of Normandy were two vital battles in World War II. Stalingrad was the site of a critical WWII Soviet victory
that terminated Germany's advance to the east. Peaceful Normandy took it's place in history as the starting point in the triumphant march across
Europe. Both these intense events were extremely significant in the outcome of the second world war.
After the Germans failed to win the war totally in 1941, they decided to start a fresh effort, and hoped that this would lead to victory. This effort
eventually led to the city of Stalingrad in 1942. Different from the the three pronged attack of the previous year, this one had two attack directions. One
from Kharkov to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before this, there was a huge aerial bombardment that destroyed most of the outer suburbs, thus pushing back the Russian's to their middle line of
defense. Because of the German bombing, the rubble which had accumulated provided easily defensible positions. The horribly inefficient Russian's
were now able to maintain some sort of defensive line, however, foolish charges into enemy lines only achieved marginal success at times. When it
came right down to it, the Russians had sized the battle down to house to house fighting, a style of combat which, although the
German's could perform, would not allow them to take advantage of their superior equipment.
By the end of the first week of September, Hitler realized that his offensive was not cutting through the enemy as promised. Despite renewed major
pushes by the attackers on October 14th, and November 11th, the defense line, (which was now isolated into three sections) was never reduced.
Angering Hitler, he quickly replaced some of his generals.
Meanwhile, while all this bungling, and well, embarrassment went on, Soviet staff was preparing for a flanking battle, which would envelope 6th
Army into a large pocket, and bring about its total destruction. General Zhukov and C. General Alexander

The Battle Of Gettysburg
The Battle of Gettysburg is one of the most well–known and important battles of the Civil War. With being held as the bloodiest battle of the civil war.
The Battle of Gettysburg took place outside of Gettysburg, Virginia; this battle was part of Robert E. Lees Gettysburg Campaign, which was his
second advance an invasion of the Northern Territory. Here are a little numbers; 165,620 total soldiers, there were 93,921 Union soldiers, and 71,699
Confederate Soldiers. As you can see already the Confederate soldiers were at a disadvantage right off the back with almost 20,000 less troops. It's
called the deadliest battle because over 50,000 casualties combined. Having corralled his army around the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, Lee
awaited the

Battle Of Shiloh
I have been reflecting over the Battle of Shiloh for about a week now, and I think that I can finally write my feelings. This battle is very important
in the war so far. I am extremely proud of my soldiers for fighting this surprise attack. Man, none of us were expecting it! I was such a proud general
those 2 days. My men fought as hard as they could, but unfortunately some people have to die. Since I have had a lot of time to think over this battle, I
have come to the conclusion that this battle is the most important so far. First off, I have just found out that there were about 23,000 casualties in this
battle. I found out that we lost 13,000 men that day. Some died, some were captured, and some wounded. That battle is the bloodiest

Analysis: The Battle Of Polygon Wood
"The Butte de Polygon" or The Battle of Polygon Wood by George Edmund Butler in 1920 depicts a soldier's parents who are standing over his
shallow grave in No Man's Land, which communicates the reality parents face when their child dies in war. It tells of the sadness the parents feel,
knowing that their child more than likely had a painful death. The painting is extremely realistic in depicting No Man's Land during World War
One, shell holes everywhere, baren, with only the husks of what were once trees. The entire setting just reeks of death and sadness. It also tells of
the futility of war, with it often ending in both sides losing many lives and gaining very little. "General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson" by Mort
Kunstler depicts the notorious Confederate General entering Winchester, Virginia on May 25th, 1962 and receiving a hero's welcome. This shows
wars more romantic side, with the General receiving glory from the townsfolk by having a parade in his name. The painting shows the rewards one
gets from being a veteran from the people around them. In the painting a boy and a girl are next to the famous General giving him flowers. The
painting shows how much the confederates love, adore and admire him. He has children chasing after him in the streets and thousands of people having
a parade in his honor just because he's going through the town.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These fighters are essentially flying coffins waiting to be shot down, leading to the pilot being crushed to death by the cockpit caving in upon impact,
or being incinerated. As with almost every person, these pilots have families, friends, a job and more. The Imperials often just treat them as disposable
cannon fodder, to be tossed aside when

Battle On The Bulge : The Battle Of The Bulge
On the eve of World War II, the United States field artillerymen were hesitant to go into war and fight; with the recent defeat of our French and British
Allies by the German Forces. The Germans were equipped with modern mobile armored welfare, including the 105mm howitzer as their main artillery
weapon. The United States had to quickly develop and produce modern artillery weapon systems to fight the Germans. This would ultimately prove to
be a key contributing factor that led to the defeat of the Germans in the largest land battle of World War II, The Battle of the Bulge.
The Battle of the Bulge, also called the Ardennes Offensive, was Hitler's last major offensive on the Western Front. The Battle of the Bulge took
place on December 16, 1944 when the Germans launched their surprise attack on Allied Forces on the Western Front stretching from a heavily
wooden forest of Ardennes to southern Belgium, Luxembourg, and into Germany. The ultimate goal of Hitler was to put a wedge between America
and Allied Forces and gain control of the Belgian port of Antwerp to force the Allies in the West to negotiate peace in the Axis power favor, so that
Hitler could then turn and fully focus on the Eastern Front (Cole). More than one million men took part in The Battle of the Bulge to include 500,000
Americans, 600,000 Germans, and 55,000 British Allies (Dictionary of American History).
The German artillery, from the 75–mm infantry with howitzers up to 210–mm heavy battalions, were

Battle Of Wounded Knee Analysis
Throughout history, the Battle of Wounded Knee has remained a sensitive topic due to lack of clarity and communication that coincided between the
parties involved during these events. Author, Stew Magnuson, translated his interpretation of this controversial portion of United States history through
his book, known as Wounded Knee 1973: Still Bleeding. Although Magnuson seems to take an unclear and sometimes neutral stance on the issue,
Russell Means' actions and views are often depicted as just and within reason. With the exception of a few aggressive incidents, Means seemed to
possess the role of a fallen hero throughout the series of events that can be identified today as the repercussions of the Battle of Wounded Knee. Parallel
to the characteristics of a fallen hero, Russell Means called major attention to the racial inequalities within the U.S., heavily depended on his personal
"moral code", and experienced major trials and losses throughout his fight for justice. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Throughout Means' involvement with the American Indians Movement (AIM), he was well–known as a leader and spokesman for the group because
of his ability to give empowering speeches. While holding this position, he was consistent with communicating to the media and public about AIM and
their overall goals. According to Magnuson, "the images of freedom fighters defying the mighty United States government were transmitted around the
world" (Magnuson,48). Because Means' recognized that the most effective way to spread awareness on American Indian violence would be to notify
popular media platforms, he was able to generate a lot more attention towards AIM's cause and racial

The Battle Of Hazelville: The Battle Of Chancellorsville
The Battle of Chancellorsville Jackson orders General Anderson's men to drop their shovels pick up their rifles and advance west to meet General
Hooker's union army now at Chancellorsville. The battle of Chancellorsville has begun (civilwar.com) Around noon. Colonel Burbarks union forces
press east along the orange turnpike sending the 12th raveling back toward General Mahoness confederate line (civilwar.com) General Sykes three
union brigades attack the confederates of General Mahon and Semmes while General "stone wall" Jackson moves reinforcements into place astride
the Sykes right flank (civilwar.com) Where and when did this battle take place 11 am May 1, 1863 the battle had started on hazelgrove. After it
happened there it started too

The Battle Of Trenton : A Critical Battle
The Battle of Trenton was a critical battle that occurred on 26 December 1776, during the early years of the American Revolutionary War. The battle
took place in the town of Trenton, New Jersey between the Continental Army, led by Commander–in–Chief, General (GEN) George Washington, and
the British contracted Hessian Army, led by Colonel (COL) Johann Rahl. TheBattle of Trenton served as the first major American victory in the
Revolutionary war. Prior to the Battle of Trenton, American forces had endured nearly constant defeat as the British pushed them from New York and
into Pennsylvania. The Continental Congress had pleaded for a battle victory to save the cause, and had all but lost hopes of achieving victory against
the British. The Battle of Trenton was more than just a needed victory, but instead served as a second chance for theContinental Army to turn the tide of
war.
Following being driven out of New York City to the west bank of the Delaware River by British forces during the summer of 1776, American forces
were suffering from the effects of physical and psychological defeat. The American army was on the cusp of falling apart all together. In addition to
this state of weakness, the majority of the Continental Army regulars were at the end of their enlistments, and it was anticipated that a large portion of
the force would likely not enlist for second terms of service.
The Continental Congress and military leaders were desperate to plan an initiative

The Battle Of Command During Battle: Confusion Of Roles

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Lisa Brown

More from Lisa Brown (19)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Battle Of Command During Battle: Confusion Of Roles