The Dangers Of Totalitarianism Essay Example

The Dangers of Totalitarianism Essay example
After World War I, which led to the overthrow of several monarchs and a complete reshaping of
Europe, the political landscape of Europe began to change. Totalitarian fascists, such as Adolf Hitler,
Joseph Stalin, and Benito Mussolini, of Germany, The Soviet Union, and Italy, rose to power. These
leaders created an atmosphere of fear in their respective countries. The only people who were safe
were the ones that did not protest at all and just let the dictators lead. Hitler's rise to power led to
World War II, where including the Holocaust, approximately sixty million people died. Sixty million
people died, while millions of others silently watched in fear, and in hopes of surviving the
genocide. This forever changed the landscape of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His new perspective inspires him to question his fellow colleagues, asking them if the world was
always like this. His coworkers tell him that it was always like this, starting with the first fireman,
Benjamin Franklin. They then got a call and were sent to a house full of books. One of the
inhabitants, a woman, refuses to leave, and, as a result, is burned with the books, severely disturbing
Montag (Bradbury 32–40). The firemen served as a reminder of what would happen if someone
broke a rule. During the Holocaust, if someone a Jewish person was caught, or someone went
against Hitler, they would either be instantly killed, or sent to a concentration camp. In Fahrenheit
451, it was close to the same thing. If someone was caught with a book, their house would be burned
down and they would either be killed or arrested. However, a very slim percentage of the population
had books because they were so afraid of the firemen. Society wiped out something as common as
reading through the instillation of fear, which represents how a totalitarian government can
accomplish anything, as long as their subjects are terrified of them.
Whereas the firemen and mechanical hound were the feared hit men in Fahrenheit 451, the Thought
Police were the source of terror in 1984. 1984 is a perfect representation of a totalitarian
government. It has a strong central government (The Party), where its head members live luxurious
lives. Next, are the normal party members, who live in
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay about Ethical Decision Making
Ethical Decision Making
"We do not quite say that the new is more valuable because it fits in; but its fitting in is a test of its
value––a test, it is true, which can only be slowly and cautiously applied, for we are none of us
infallible judges of conformity.", the famous poet T. S. Elliot once said. Ethics and conformity go
hand in hand; it is hard to talk about one subject without involving the other. The past two weeks of
this humanities course has been centered around the relationship which exists between these two
subjects of matter. The course allowed us to receive an in–depth look at the decision making
process, including moral and ethical decision making, and to compare this to that of other students
and writers. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If it does decide carefully, for the outcome is yours to deal with. Each individual person has their
own set of ethics. This set of moral principals can vary radically, depending on the subject,
circumstance, or even upbringing. On any given day an individuals morals can change depending on
the happenings of that day or previous days. One tiny event may have such a large impact on an
individual that they may choose to rethink their whole ethical system. The ethics you determine are
yours and yours alone. You do not need a book explaining why you feel the way you do. Each
individual has suffered through different hardships and has breezed through different high periods in
their life. Ethics build as a person ages and experiences more. The more you have seen and
witnessed, the more able you are to draw conclusions as to whether you have a point of view on that
particular subject. In addition to individual and personal codes of ethics, each person also has their
own method of making decisions. Hypothetically speaking, a college freshman is at a Fraternity
party with her new girlfriends. While at the party her friends decide to try the drug ecstasy; she has
never done drugs before. Her friends tell her that the fraternity guys said the drug makes you feel
good all over. "C'mon, don't be a chicken *censored*, if the guys do it then we can do it. It'll be so
much fun", one girl exclaims. Another says, "Don't

Analysis Of ' Brave New World '
Brave New World revolves around the idea of totalitarianism and is set in a futuristic world where
the State uses science and pleasure to form a controlled society. The novel argues that the most
powerful totalitarian state would be one that doesn 't overwhelm and frighten its citizens, but instead
manages to convince its citizens to love their slavery. In the novel, the Director uses that the
Bokanovsky Process to help social stability because the clones (humans) it produces are made to do
things that are told by the State. The cloning process is one of the tools the World State uses to
shows its guiding motto: "Community, Identity, Stability."(Huxley, 5) We see a world of unknown
and dehumanized people dominated by a government made powerful by the use of technology. The
labs also symbolize how the totalitarian State abuses technology for its own ends instead of using it
to improve civilization. Also, we see that the State has manipulated the people to believe that the
actions of the State are the best for everyone. This is evident in the quote "The operation undergone
voluntarily for the good of Society, not to mention the fact that it carries a bonus amounting to six
months' salary"( Huxley,5) From this quote, we can see how they control society yet make them feel
good about what they are doing. Through the quote, "Till at last the child 's mind is these
suggestions, and the sum of the suggestions is the child 's mind. And not the child 's mind only. The
adult 's mind

The Political Front Runners Of Great Britain
It was April 2010. David Cameron and Gordon Brown were the political front–runners of Great
Britain. However, that realization was irrelevant to what was about to happen. Everyone was
watching as the highly–anticipated, first televised debates in the United Kingdom began. The
discourse ended after several hours, and a new candidate quickly emerged as the leader. His name
was Nick Clegg. He led the Liberal Democrats, the smallest party. One might think about it over and
over again and ask, "How did such a thing happen?". The answer, in itself, lies within the influence
of the media, the power of language, and how its words are intertwined so masterfully that the effect
becomes immeasurable. As Diane Setterfield once noted, "There is something about words. In
expert hands, manipulated deftly, they take you prisoner. They wind themselves around your limbs
like spider silk, and when you are so enthralled you cannot move, they pierce your skin, enter your
blood, numb your thoughts. Inside you they work their magic." The press established a perception
for Clegg and made it known not only to all those in attendance, but to everyone who was watching
across the nation. Based on his calm, collective demeanor and the way he was in control, Nick
looked like the "host." David and Gordon, on the other hand, appeared rattled and uncomfortable.
They went from being the top two candidates to "guests," in a matter of several hours. That just did
not seem right. The power of language, as

1984 Analysis Essay
History and 1984
"War is peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is strength." In George Orwell's 1984, a light is
shining on the concept of a negative utopia, or "dystopia" caused by totalitarianism. Totalitarianism
is, "a form of government in which political authority exercises absolute and centralized control
over all aspects of life " and any opposing political and/or cultural expressions are suppressed.
Having lived in a time of totalitarianism regime, Orwell had a firsthand account of its horrific
lengths and negative affects. Within 1984, Orwell derives aspects of the actual government of his
time to create, "The Party", "Big Brother", and the "Thought Police". Using these fictional
recreations of reality, Orwell's 1984 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Stalin use this concept in the 30's for the same reason as the party; to make the people believe the
government was legitimate. Another aspect of Orwell's prophetic novel is the thought of technology.
During the time that Orwell wrote 1984, the radio was more comment than the television and
computers had not even been considered. Nonetheless, Orwell found a way to include these things
in his story. The tele–screen could be related to the modern TV. Also, in the book, the control of
machinery and sources of information are controlled by computers. Orwell uses technology in this
book to
show that these things that were made to help man, can lead to the corruptness and downfall of
society, much like what is being seen today. Living in a world that continues to make advancements
technologically and politically, a book written more than 50 years ago still warns the world of what
could happen if government becomes too forceful. Because of George Orwell's strong hatred for
totalitarianism and its life dictating qualities, readers can get a taste of the perfect "dystopia".
Though the people of today have been warned and are afraid of an all controlling government, they
continue to allow the concept of 1984 to become more and more real. If people continue to just
watch their governments make decisions and not ask questions, they will fall victim to its power. If a
man not of this time understands the terror of totalitarianism, everyone should

The Depictions of Imperialism in Shooting an Elephany by...
Shooting an Elephant" is an autobiographically influenced short story written by George Orwell and
published in 1936. It deals with the inner conflict of an imperial police officer in Burma who feels
pressured by the Burmese and forced to kill an outraged elephant in order to prove himself and his
status as an imperial police officer.
The short story can be divided into two parts. In the first two paragraphs the narrator introduces
himself and talks about his life and experience in working as a "sub–divisional police officer" in the
town of Moulmein in Lower Burma. He also talks about his ambiguous attitude towards the
Burmese people who ridicule and mock him because of anti–European feelings and towards the
British Empire whose "dirty ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the last paragraph of the short story he reflects on this incident and talks about discussions
whether it was right of him to shoot the elephant or not.
The story is set in the early 20th century in a town in Lower Burma and the only character
introduced to the reader is the European imperial police officer, whose name is unknown. The main
thesis of the story is not presented at the beginning of the text but rather develops through the course
of the actions. With his opposing attitude towards the British Empire the police officer is in a
conflict with himself right from the beginning of the story which makes him a complex character.
He works for an Empire which ideals and actions he does not support but he can not identify with
the Burmese people either because, as an European, he is not accepted in their country. Being
mocked by the Burmese and seeing the "dirty work" of the Empire he feels hatred for both the
oppressed and the oppressor. His realisation about what imperialism really is makes him even more
reluctant towards the British Empire but at the same time he does not see a way out of the situation
and feels pressured by the ideal of imperialism into doing something he does not feel right about.
Orwell based his short story on his own experience as a police officer in Burma and chooses to use
an auto diegetic first–person narrator to tell his story. He wants to talk about his own experiences or
his own inner

Animal Farm, 1984 Essay
Animal farm and 1984
Napoleon, the leader of all the animals of the Rebellion, can be compared and contrasted with Big
Brother, the leader of all the people of 1984. Both Big Brother and Napoleon show the qualities of a
cruel ruler. Similar to Big Brother, Napoleon is a secretive plotter who works behind the scenes
rather than openly. However, unlike Napoleon, Big Brother periodically appears on the television
screen. Napoleon and Big Brother both work continually to weaken their rivals, whether it is by
removing Snowball or eliminate Rutherford. Both place importance on complicated ceremonies and
parades to prevent their workers from thinking about their schemes. Napoleon's control over animal
farm is not as powerful as Big Brother's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At the end, one is presumably vaporized.
The characters in Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty–Four have similar and distinct characteristics,
which put towards in the growth of theme. Big Brother and Napolean, unrelenting and sly,
established a totalitarian group. Winston and Boxer are true followers of their leaders, they always
thing the leader is right.
All together these two books share many features, George Orwell is trying to show
Totalitarianism/Animalism and fascism. He has set the two stories very well in the way he has
compared and contrasted the characters to show different points of political aspects.
Short Summary of Animal Farm
Animal Farm is an allegory of the Russian Revolution, it is based on certain aspects of the
Revolution. For example, revolting the government, all of the animals on the farm group together to
overthrow their cruel owner because they believe they are not being treated as well as they should
be. When the animals come into power after overthrowing their master the pigs consider themselves
to be the dictators on the farm, snowball one of the pigs starts to plan building a windmill to give
power to the farm but Napoleon is not happy that snowball is leading the animals in thought, so he
starts blaspheming him, the animals are agreeing for Snowballs idea but now Napoleon is outraged.
Napoleon lets out a high pitch squeal and out of nowhere a pack of dogs he raised from puppies ran
after Snowball and chased him into

Fahrenheit 451 And 1984
Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the
twentieth century. Philosophical optimism of a bright future held by humanity in general was taken
advantage of by the promise of a better life through sacrifice of individuality to the state. In the
books Brave New World, 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 clear opposition to these subtle entrapments was
voiced in similarly convincing ways. They first all established, to varying degrees of balance, the
atmosphere and seductiveness of the "utopia" and the fear of the consequences of acting in the non–
prescribed way through character development. A single character is alienated because of their
inability to conform – often in protest to the forced ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When these and other questions weigh upon his mind he begins to realize that something is
fundamentally wrong with the world he is living in. In Brave New World the main character,
Bernard, is set apart from society by physical differences, which, in a society of 'engineered' people
is extremely inhibiting. It is these 'defects' which cause him to look for a deeper meaning than the
drug induced happiness forced upon him. These characters, although alienated in the novels, are
believable and rational. The acts of their questioning in their search for the truth and real emotion
persuade the reader to do the same thing. It is in this manner that the utility of these novels becomes
apparent; through the demands they make of the reader personally – a superior social commentary,
one that demands interaction, is born.
The characters' struggles to hide their newly found individuality is a futile one. In Orwell's
interpretation of the totalitarian state of 1984, the society is technically and urbanly engineered to
spy on and perceive people's very thoughts. The society justifies these invasions by eliminating the
importance of the individual. The constant barrage of information regarding the greatness of the
state and Big Brother's supremacy over the common man forces everyone (in good mental health) to
accept these as the only unchanging facts. Any deviation from these beliefs would be immediately
noticeable, and

Pass The Opium, Please Essay
Religion is said to be the opiate of the masses, and it is definitely a point of interest in George
Orwell's famous novel Animal Farm. In it, Orwell pointedly attacks religion in general and
Christianity in particular through the use of a well placed symbolic bird by the name of Moses.
Orwell's stance is rather apparent as Moses darts about the farm scene conveying the duality of
Christianity quite superbly.
At the first mention of the raven Moses, one immediately gets the impression that he stands for
something quite larger than just a simple bird that lives on the Manor Farm. Firstly his name, Moses,
is an obvious biblical reference conveying the idea that he may stand for religion or Christianity. It
is not a subtle point that Orwell ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his reference to Sugercandy Mountain there is an obvious correlation to the kingdom of heaven in
traditional Christian belief. This reinforces the idea in the reader's mind that Moses is most
definitely standing for Christianity in this story. But so far Orwell has not made any criticisms
against Christianity or religion, he has merely set up the character. The first time we get the idea that
Orwell may be viewing Moses with a critical eye is when he describes the bird as being lazy and
unwilling to do any. All the bird is apparently good for is to lie around all day and warm up to Mr.
Jones, all the while getting special treats and even getting to venture inside the farm house. This is a
very deliberate shot against the Christian religion. Orwell is painting a very critical portrait of
Christianity as a tired and pathetic institution that is no longer living up to the ideals it once so
vehemently believed in. But of course this institution, or Moses, still talks grandly about the
kingdom of Sugercandy Mountain and how all good Russians and animals will go there when they
die to live an existence of eternal bliss. This part of Moses's involvement is basically telling the
acutely aware reader a very pointed lesson: that not all that shines is sure to be gold (or God in this
case). The last mention of Moses at his initial involvement leaves quite an interesting taste

Geroge Orwell Essay
Geroge Orwell
"One of the things Orwell bequeathed us was the adjective 'Orwellian'.... It is a frightening word,
generally applied to a society organized to crush and dehumanize the individual, sometimes
signifying the alienation of that individual if he dares to rebel" (Lewis 13). George Orwell, the
pseudonym for Eric Arthur Blair, depicted the importance of the individual in society and the danger
of too much community in his literature. Through his personal experiences, however, he explored
the ideas of socialism and was torn between the individual and community ideals. In his literature
and his past, Orwell spoke against movements that remove the individual, but still emphasized the
importance of community. Thus, he advocated a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He enjoyed the idea that everybody was equal, but he still showed resentment towards it. His inner
conflict between these two ideas and his experiences as a member in the Spanish Civil War caused
him to choose a median between the community ideals which he saw and the individual ideals
which he missed: "I have seen wonderful things and at last really believe in socialism, which I never
did before" (qtd. in Chen).
With the start of World War II, George Orwell began his fight against Nazism, fascism, and
communism. In the eyes of many, communism became interchangeable with socialism, and he
criticized writers of his time that were in support of Stalin and his "socialist" movement: "Why
should writers be attracted by a form of Socialism that makes mental honesty impossible" (qtd. in
Lewis 76)? In an attempt to pacify the radical communist movements and change imperialism, he
spoke of a third method to reform the British Empire–a middle ground that would create a socialist
community in Britain. John Newsinger wrote, "[He had a] call for a new socialist movement that
would reject both Communist–style revolution and Labour Party reformism in favour of a third way
to socialism, a third way that he continued to call revolutionary but that was adapted to modern
conditions" (qtd. in Chen). Through this, one can see that Orwell wanted to avoid such movements
as communism, which attempted to obtain control over the individual, and yet he had a need to
preserve the

The Use of Distortion as a Literary Device in George...
Animal Farm, by George Orwell, is an excellent example of distortion as a literary device. The story
is set up as a fable using a third person objective viewpoint and personification of animals to
represent historical figures and stereotypes. Distortion can also be found in much of the symbolism
throughout the novel. Similar to a fable, Animal Farm makes use of personification. In the story,
farm animals are used to represent different classes of people, from the average working man to
government officials and police or military personnel. This element of the novel goes deeper, when
the pigs on the farm begin to resemble historical figures such as Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky, of
Russia. Through distortion of character, Orwell brings ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This brings the reader to the level of the working class animals and instills a sense of uncertainty
and disillusionment that is felt by most of the characters in the story. In the beginning, the animals
are excited by Major's talk of rebellion against Mr. Jones and through Orwell's objective point of
view, the same feeling of insurrection is passed on to the audience. As the pigs weave an intricate
web of lies and scandal, the reader gets the sense that not all is well in the same way the animals do.
The difference between the animals and ourselves lies in intelligence. The author deliberately makes
the characters dumber than the average person, allowing us to see through the deception of the pigs,
without the use of a third person omniscient viewpoint. Symbolically, Animal Farm itself is
supposed to represent Russia and the Soviet Union under Communist control. The farm in today's
world, being a small, self–sustaining entity may relate to current conditions in North Korea. It seems
that Kim Jong–il, like the pigs, is much more equal than his subjects. Kim and Napoleon seem to
share the paranoia of being attacked by more powerful rivals, and both it seems, have a desire to
keep their respective nations in the dark. Perhaps less specifically, the farm could represent human
society as a whole. As mentioned earlier, the characters display an entire spectrum of human classes
and stereotypical personalities.
The way the pigs altered the seven commandments

Innocence and Oppressiveness in Fahrenheit 451 and Animal...
In the book Fahrenheit 451 and the book Animal Farm characters who are unaware of their
surroundings allow for characters such as Beatty, Mr. Jones, and Napoleon to take over. Often times
it is necessary for an oppressive power to be forceful in order to take over. Hitler is a leader who
used force to take over the German people. In the case of both of these books the naïveté groups of
people are used for their ignorance for the benefit of the leaders, and physical power is not required.
Animal Farm and Fahrenheit 451 both have a group of naïve people who share the inability to
question power, possess loyalty, and stupidity. In Animal Farm and Fahrenheit 451 the naiveté
groups failed to question their authority's power. In the book ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The animals along with the citizens from each of the two books are loyal to their leaders, they
continue to uphold the information given to them and they embrace their power. In Fahrenheit 451
Mildred, the wife of Guy Montage is confident in the information she is given. Mildred spends her
life watching and listening to that parlor walls and their local radio station. This continuous use of
the same source nourishes her unawareness to the truth. "You want to give up everything? After all
these years of working, because, one night, some woman and her books?––" (Bradbury 51) Mildred
tries to explain to Montage that his dramatic decision to change his beliefs is corrupt. She tells him
that he cannot just agree with what this woman is telling him and he cannot leave everything he
knows for "some books". Mildred is loyal to the principles instilled in her by their town's
government. "Napoleon is always right," (Orwell 70) Boxer voices his opinion to the other animals.
His broad statement gives evidence to the fidelity he has to his leader Napoleon. Mildred and Boxer
both strongly agree with their leaders values and they encompass much trust with in their leaders.
The succinct stupidity that the characters of the naiveté groups in both novels have is reasoning for
why characters are being able to be oppressed by characters like Beatty and Napoleon. Mildred is
foolish because

George Orwell's Coming Up for Air Essay
George Orwell's Coming Up for Air
George Orwell's novel, Coming Up for Air, portrays England at two different times. The story is
based around George Bowling in 1939 and his life in the suburbs of London on Ellesmere Road,
where all the houses are the same. He is very cynical of the world around him and dreams of his
times as a child in Lower Binfield when things were not perfect, but not yet ruined by the Great War.
The vision of 1900 England versus England in 1939 creates a sharp contrast in life for George
Bowling. In 1939 England is on the verge of another war, and life is impersonal, harsh, and
industrial. The reality of 1939 is only accentuated by George's trip to his childhood home of Lower
Binfield, where nothing is the same ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his excitement about fishing he buys a new rod and all the necessary equipment to go fishing but
decides to go and check out his old fishing spots before he actually fishes. The first spot he goes to
is the Thames River where he is met with a surprise. When he arrives at the river he sees, "The place
was black with people. And where the water–meadows used to be– tea–houses, penny–in–the–slot
machines, sweet kiosks and chaps selling Wall's Ice Cream. Might as well have been at Margate."
The stream where he had found solitude as a child was completely overrun with people. He could
not fish in a place with the kind of commotion that would scare all the fish away. The river itself had
also changed. The clear water he saw as a kid had become murky and brown. As a child he could
fish all day by the river and not see another person. England had changed since he was a child.
Crowds of people and a polluted river ruined his nostalgic view of fishing. England had grown and
with the growth of the town came the destruction of nature.
Discouraged but not completely done with the idea of fishing he decided to go to find his other
sacred fishing spot. This spot had suffered an even worse fate. The spot was located near the house
at Upper Binfield (which had been turned into an insane asylum). Much to George's dismay a new
housing development had gone in by the pond he used to fish at. The pond itself had

Literary Analysis : Animal Farm
Literary Analysis Mollie In Animal Farm there are many controversial figures who also have
interesting connections to the Russian revolution. Mollie is among these controversial members of
the mythical animal run society. She has connections to the rich prissy people in Russia that when
the revolution took place who immediately looked for an easy way out as soon as they had to do
work to earn their due. In Orwell's Animal Farm Mollie is vain, selfish, and did not care about the
revolution leaving before the action. Mollie has never been all that committed of a character on the
farm. Often caring more about her sugar and bows then what work she needed to do for Mr. Jones.
As time went on, and the revolution took place, there is little to no change in how she acts, still
feeling an obsession for the lavish things that comes with being a pet brings. The first time it is
apparent that Mollie is still attached to the lavish things is when in Orwell's Animal Farm is on page
22–23 "They were just coming down the stairs when Mollie was discovered to be missing. Going
back, the others found that she remained behind in the best bedroom she had taken a piece of blue
ribbon from Mrs. Jones's dressing table, and was holding it against her shoulder and admiring
herself in the glass in a very silly manner. The others reproached her sharply, and they went
outside." She is obviously at this point still not willing to commit for the greater cause of the farm.
Will she ever come around and

Animal Farm By George Orwell
The Russian Revolution in 1917 was portrayed in Animal Farm, to show how the government is
more unequal, totalitarian and brutal just like presently. Animal Farm is created by George Orwell,
who displays this story as a ridicule, teaches a lesson by showing the dangers of propaganda, and
uses animals to hide the original individuals. During the Revolution, Russians had lost hope in Czar
Nicholas II due to his rampant behavior and how the government was slowing separating; therefore,
he had a short–term. The Bolshevik 's was a political party led by Vladimir Lenin who had led a
revolution, successfully overthrown the Czarist regime and set up the new government. After Lenin
's death, a bitter battle with Joseph Stalin who was head of the Communist Party and Leon Trotsky
follower of Marxist theory had formed. Stalin gains control over the government and the country
falls under totalitarianism. This dystopian novella is used by having disputable characters and shows
the risks of abusing language and power. In this book, George Orwell illustrates how his characters
are involved in manipulation that leads to unfairness and corruption.
Orwell exemplifies how Napoleon is an allegorical character named Joseph Stalin, who banishes
Leon Trotsky created as Snowball; due to his animosity toward him. Napoleon is seen at first to be a
good leader, but he is eventually taken over by greed. "They dashed straight for Snowball, who only
sprang from his place just in time to

Summary Of George Orwell 's ' Brave New World '
Rachel Malloy 28 November 2014 APE 3 Complete Government Exploitation of Love The novels,
1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley both showcases how the futuristic
totalitarian governments take complete control of their societies. In 1984, the government does it by
putting fear of Big Brother and the party into the people. Whereas in Brave New World, they control
them by having people take soma, a drug which does not allow people to feel emotions or really
anything. The views on love are similar but yet differ between the novels, in Brave New World,
John, a savage, comes to truly love Lenina which Lenina only understands as that she should have
sex with him. In 1984, Winston believes that he should have sex with someone he loves, which he
thought was true with his wife, but it turned out not to be. He later comes to love Julia which he
sleeps with and they are punished for it. Whereas in Brave New World, John's mother, Linda, is
punished by being sent to live with savages after falling in love. In the two novels, 1984 and Brave
New World, Orwell and Huxley both depict throughout their futuristics novels how the dystopian
government functions in controlling love and relationships in society but the punishments and views
on love are much different in the two novels. In the novel, 1984, the government controlled people
by not only making them fear Big Brother but also by watching them through the telescreens.
Robert Hatch states that they not only

The Themes and Motivations Behind George Orwell's 1984
ABSTRACT Anyone who considers themselves a lover of good fiction must know who George
Orwell is. Anyone who loves good cynical fiction has to have read his master piece, simply titled
1984. 1984 is a phenomenal tale of government gone awry, in its attempts to unify what's left of the
world, after the atomic wars waged in Europe. The story is based on Mr. Orwell's fears of
immensely powerful governments, especially totalitarianism. If you are a true lover and you have
read the story, The next logical question one must ask themselves is, do we understand why he wrote
this wonderful piece of work? Please allow me the opportunity to enlighten you. In order to
understand the why; I propose that we must look into the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
His mother wanted him to have a public school education, but his family was not wealthy enough to
afford the fees, making it necessary for him to obtain a scholarship. George's Uncle Charles
Limouzin, recommended St Cyprian's School, in Eastbourne, Sussex. Years later, George wrote that
he hated the school and the distaste for the place brought forth his essay, "Such, Such were the
Joys". (Widman, n.d.) While at St. Cyprian's, several key events transpired for Eric. He met Cyril
Connolly, who also became a noted writer and editor, and the onset of World War I occurred. Cyril
who became editor of Horizon magazine would ultimately publish many of Orwell's essays. While
at the school Eric wrote two poems that were published in the Henley and South Oxfordshire
Standard, the local newspaper. At the ripe age of 13, Eric's poem, "Awake! Young Men of England",
was published. The poem, a call to arms for able bodied Englishmen to join the war effort, helped
him earn scholarships to Wellington College and Eton College. (Bowker, n.d.) After spending a term
at Wellington in 1917, Eric earned a place at Eton as a King's Scholar. He remained at Eton until
1921. (Bowker, n.d.) During his tenure at Eton, several key historical happenings occurred that
would shape his later years. Eric learned of the Armistice that ended World War I, (and though he
was not

Different Forms Of Government Treat Their Citizens
The amount of power that a government should have within a country has been argued throughout
history. A mutualistic relationship between a government and its people is clear in almost every
society in the world, yet, the dominance one entity has over the other varies from case to case. The
United States' foundation is based upon the fact that the Government works for the people in which
actual citizens take part in maintaining a fair, unified authority, but this modern democracy has
many pros and cons and is still not agreeably the best form of government. People's opinions differ
on how much say any given person should have on the decisions his or her county makes and the
relationship a government should have with its people is very ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The most shocking part of the novel in which doublethink is implemented is when the Party
suddenly announces that Oceania is at war with Eastasia and no longer Eurasia. The part that is
shocking is that once the announcement is made about the change of countries, the people
unquestionably change their previous hate towards Eastasia and immediately despise their once
allies Eurasia. The unconditioned trust in the government truly shows how brainwashed the
population is, and because of this trust the society is able to function successfully. The true
patriotism of the citizens facilitates a lack of anguish over the harsh injustices from the government;
everyone in Oceania is content with a brutal lifestyle and none dare to revolt against The Party.
Winston shares how society functions successfully behind such a corrupt government when he says,
"In a way, the world−view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of
understanding it"... "By lack of understanding they remained sane. They simply swallowed
everything, and what they swallowed did them no harm, because it left no residue behind" (Orwell).
Since the decisions that are made in society are done completely by the government, the citizens of
Oceania have to absorb whatever the Party announces as fact. With no thoughts about how life could
become better the people coexist in a habitat in which they truly believe could not be improved. All
injustice and conflict is diminished once people

A New Dystopia By George Orwell
A New Dystopia
Who will reign supreme; Aldous Huxley or George Orwell? Ever since these two authors released
their dystopian novels over 50 years ago, both authors and avid fans have argued as to which
dystopia will take over our society. Will it be the brute force, boot and gun approach of Orwell 's
dystopia or the all–loving, drug–accepting society that Huxley illustrates? If you take a closer look,
a mix of both dystopias is quite apparent in our society today; we are living in our own modern,
advanced and constantly developing dystopia. The topics discussed in these two novels cover a
variety of subjects, sex, drugs, freedom, religion and beliefs, and life in general. Both have their own
idea of what outcome these topics will take in their most dire form. In this paper I will be comparing
and contrasting their differences and then comparing them to our world today in an effort to see
which direction our society is headed.
The topic of sex in these two novels is depicted in very different ways. In 1984, sex and intimate
relationships are taboo. Big Brother thinks that a relationship with intimacy between two individuals
may cause them to unite together and could possible lead to the questioning of Big Brother, which is
unacceptable and potentially dangerous. On the opposite side of the spectrum, in Brave New World,
everyone is expected to engage with as many partners as possible. Also, that engaging with only one
partner a number of times is suspicious. In fact if you don

Telescreens In 1984 Essay
Imagine the World as a place with screens that watch ones every move, and microphones placed in
every wall, and a posters stating BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU. Ultimately, people would
behave a lot differently when someone is watching their every move, in terms of thinking twice
before they blurt words out and thinking about the actions they commit. Winston Smith is a member
of the outer party, in which his every move is watched. He lives in Oceania, where a totalitarian
government is established and every sound, move, or thought is look over. The members of society
are constantly being watched, and the government controls their actions and thoughts. In Geroge
Owell's novel, 1984, he illustrates methods of control through telescreens, thought ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Winston is conversing with Smith old boy during a Ministry announcement, the girl from the
fiction department is staring deep into Winston's soul. Winston starts to sweat and thoughts start to
wander in his head; however he remembers that it is horrible to have his brain wander. " It was
terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you are in a public place or within range of a
telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away" (60). The telescreens dispersed throughout the
town of Oceania can detect ones mood in any setting, which frightens the population of Oceania.
"Life, if you looked about you, bore no resemblance not only to the lies that streamed out of the
telescreens, but even in the ideals that the party was trying to achive." As Winston is arriving at his
flat, a voice announces over the telescreen and can detect any slight sound Winston makes. "There
was of coarse no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How
often, or on what system, the thought police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork"(3).
Evidently, the people controlling the telescreens could tap into a person at any given time. Winston
decides to keep is back facing the telescreen because it will be more safe for

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' Shooting An Elephant '
Everyone has a moment in their lives that changes the way they think, or identifies our true views;
an event that reveals a part of them that was never known before then. For example, in the essay
"Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell, Orwell himself is working as a British police officer in
Burma in the 1920's. He does not like his job because of his hate for the oppressive nature of the
British government. However, he does take the job seriously. One day, he gets a report about an
elephant tearing through the town. He quickly gets his gun and rides to the scene with his horse.
Once Orwell arrives, the elephant is long gone, but he sees all the damage it has caused, even killing
a man in its rampage. Orwell asks for a larger gun, only to be used as a last resort against the
elephant, and sets off to find the elephant. Many miles away, in a field, the elephant stands.
However, it seems to have calmed down and is now eating as if nothing happened. By this point,
Orwell has attracted the attention of hundreds of the natives, who have followed him in anticipation
of seeing him kill the elephant. Although Orwell did not want to kill the elephant, he felt as though
he had to, because of the position of power he held over the natives. He shoots the elephant, but is
not content with his decision. Orwell believes that it was his position of power in the community
that forced him into shooting the elephant, to avoid looking like a fool. It was through this event in
his life that

Animal Farm-WWII Propaganda: How Did It Work?
Freedom is a very valuable thing, sometimes taken for granted. Some people desire freedom for the
right reasons, and some people desire it for their own self–seeking reasons. Every country has their
own rules, government, and leaders. Of course, the leadership in Russia during WWII was very
harsh and malevolent compared to our government now. George Orwell used symbolism in his
American classic Animal Farm to demonstrate how communism affected people, more specifically
during WWII. There are a plethora of similar things between the leader in Animal Farm, Squealer,
and the second in command Nazi leader, Joseph Goebbell. Squealer and Goebbell's following of
people was so strong in numbers because of the manipulation and exaggeration used to keep the
citizens enthralled, which led to a catastrophic downfall. Manipulation played a significant role in
both Animal Farm and WWII. Squealer and Goebbell used this tactic to take control of every one.
Both leaders promised prosperity and good fortune. That's what the citizens and animals in the war
and on the farm believed and wanted. They felt so mistreated before, that when someone came along
like Squealer and Goebbell, they believed every word from their mouths. The leaders manipulated
their citizens because they knew they were weak. The citizens were promised so much freedom, that
it changed their mindset, not realizing what it would take to get to that freedom. The false promises
and disappointment caused many people

Shooting an Elephant
The art of telling a story relies on the language used. Whether a writer is good at using the language
appropriately is vital for an interesting and impressive story. So how can the uses of appropriate
language affect the whole narration of a story?
George Orwell, one of the most famous English authors, was born Eric Arthur Blair in Motihari,
India, in 1903. His father was a colonial official for the British and his mother's family also had
colonial ties. In 1922, Orwell worked as a British imperial policeman in Burma for five years but he
finally returned to England again because he recognized the injustices of the British imperial rule in
Burma and could not suffer the guilt of oppressing the Burmese anymore. Later, Orwell spent the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then, he starts saying that the elephant was "a huge and costly piece of machinery" (Orwell 95) and
the elephant seemed harmless right now. The young officer continues claiming,"I did not in the least
want to shoot him" (Orwell 95). These all shows the young man's sympathy toward the elephant, but
more importantly Orwell builds up a tension here by using three different versions of repetition to
show how the young officer was wavering in his position. For the first quote, "no intention"
somehow indicates the young narrator's thinking: he seems to be saying, "I have no purpose to do
that and I am not going to do it." But then in the second quote, he says "ought not to" instead of "no
intension of," which contains much more certainty of not killing the elephant. It shows that the
young officer knew he should not shoot the elephant, but he certainly felt a lot of pressure and his
mind was not as firm as in the last statement. In the third statement, the young officer's tone is
obviously weaker than the last two; "I did not in the least want..." this tone sounds just like a
prisoner talking about how he does not want to commit a murder, finishes it saying "I didn't want to
kill that person." The young officer's mind was wavering and he was taking a step forward toward
killing the elephant everytime he introduces his different expressions of unwilling to kill the
elephant. Orwell uses this repetition not

The Dysptopian Novel of 1984 by Geroge Orwell
The dystopian novel of 1984, written by the English writer George Orwell, was first published by
Secker and Warburg in 1949. The novel discusses the life of Winston Smith and his venture to rebel
against the totalitarian state in which he resides. George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning after World
War II, with the intention of describing a society that he would never want to live the day to see.
Unfortunately, he knew that it was more of a precaution to say this is how life for some was like in
Germany or the Soviet Union. Both of these places having been in power during his time he wrote
this to show the rest of the world how it was too late for them, and coming nearer for everyone else.
During the war, Orwell worked for the British Broadcasting Company, where he got the idea for
newspeak. Orwell's main goals in 1984 are to depict the frightening techniques a totalitarian
government (in which a single ruling class possesses absolute power) might use to control its
subjects, and to illustrate the extent of the control that government is able to exert. George Orwell's
1984, the theme that a government may use mind controlling and brainwashing to maintain power
over the society has been brought out through many symbols, events and ideas. In the year of 1984,
the world has been divided into three super powers: Oceania, Eastasia and Eurasia. In the society of
Oceania, which is controlled by a totalitarian Party, love, sex, joy, happiness, personal documents,
thoughts, etc, are

Essay on Communism and Socialism in George Orwell's Animal...
Communism and socialism in animal farn
Communism and socialism plays an important role in Animal Farm by George Orwell. All of the
events that occurred in the book represent actual events that happened to a communist country, now
known as Russia. Both communism and socialism have similar beliefs but still have their
differences. There has never been a communist society where people were happy and treated as
equals to high ranking government officials. There has been a time in Animal Farm when all animals
were treated equal, but that was only in the start of the post–revolution. In the end of the book
however, there is a different story. The motif of the book is that any attempt to achieve the goals of a
communist and socialist society ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The pigs were without a doubt the leaders of Animal Farm. They could do anything to you, they
could make you live and could make you die. The socialist system is that the production and
distribution of products is maintained by the community. In Animal Farm , the animals were put in
even more smaller communities by species. There was groups made during the early post–revolution
like the Egg Production Committee, the Clean Tails League and the Whiter Wool Movement. Also
all political actions are done by the community. There was the Meeting every Sunday where all the
animals met in the barn. What they did in the barn was they planned what to do next week and also
debate resolutions. The resolutions were put by pigs who were the only ones with the ability to make
them. Soon Napoleon and Snowball were debating against each other and were trying to get
majority for themselves. All the other animals couldn&#8217;t think up of anything for
themselves but both of the pigs were throwing many at them. They soon got out of their Socialist
ways and started to become closer to communism. An example of the complete end of Socialism in
Animal Farm was when Napoleon ordered the hens to lay a certain amount of eggs. The hens
refused to do so but was forced to which is definitely not socialistic. It isn&#8217;t socialistic
because the production of products is maintained by the community and the hens are part of the

General Overview of Chapter 11: The Huxleyan Warning Essays
General overview of Chapter 11 entitled– The Huxleyan Warning.
At the beginning of Chapter 11 in Neil Postman's book, he reminds us that there are two
representations of how a culture maybe withered. He writes that a culture either becomes almost like
a high security prison or a culture can become just like a mockery.
Postman then goes on to acknowledges that there are several different places that exist in the world
where the totalitarianism of thought control exists. Another well–known author named George
Orwell describes this in his fantastically written book '1984'. Postman does not see America that
way...in the way that Orwell viewed America. As an alternative, Postman believes that America is
actually threatened by "an enemy with a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Key Concepts for Chapter 11
Postman goes on in the chapter to admit that he cannot offer any real solutions to this problem and
he also lists those reasons. The first reason is that most people do not believe this big problem needs
a cure and the second reason is that most likely there are no solutions anyway. Postman does give
some of his own suggestions that may help fix the problem. The first suggestion that Postman gives
is that a person must abandon any type of argument that television may be taken away. He writes
that Americans will not abandon the many conveniences that are brought on by the vast forms of
technology. They cannot be stopped from creating a more sophisticated technology item to
substitute it.
Further on in the chapter, Postman does not really believe that the content that is show on television
is the actual problem. Since the real problem is not watch people watch, then this brings on the
thought that we can find the solution in the way that we watch television programming. (160).
Postman believes that this world has not discovered what television actually is as a type of
technology, and as a result, there have not been many conversations about this.
In the chapter, Postman list a short series of questions that he believes should be addressed. Those
questions are about the nature of the information that is displayed on television, the psychic effects
that this information has on the mind, and how this information changes the definitions of

The Dystopian Novel, By George Orwell, And Andrew Niccol...
"War is peace, freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength" (Orwell 7) this is one of the very many
slogans that were used to control society in George Orwell 's piece 1984. Dystopian literature is a
futuristic universe that is oppressive and uses bureaucratic, totalitarian, and/or technological control
to control society. In Orwell 's Dystopian book 1984, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr 's short story "Harrison
Bergeron", and Andrew Niccol 's film In time, there are many examples of a Dystopia is that contain
a lot of comparisons between the stories. Dystopian literature whether it be novel, film, or short
story focuses on similar characteristics and things. A similarity that these three dystopias have in
common is the time setting. All of these stories are set to be in a futuristic time, or at least a time that
was the future from them. For instance, Orwell 's book 1984 was written in 1948 as it stated on
crisesmagazine.com "George Orwell Wrote 1984 in 1948", but since it wasn't 1984, or anywhere
near, so at the time it was considered the future. In Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" the
author clearly gives evidence that they are ahead of time when he writes "The year was 2081 and
everybody was finally equal" (Vonnegut 1). the story is set to be 66 years ahead of the current year.
In Niccol's dystopian movie In time, the exact year is not clearly stated, but in the plot summary
written by Claudio Carvalho they mention that it was set to be in futuristic times as it says "In a

Government Privacy Analysis
How much do you know about the American government? Does the government respect the privacy
of their citizens? Is the government violating Americans privacy? In 2013 a guy named Edward
Snowden released government files that prove that the government has a file for every cell phone in
America. Meaning that every text message, photo, phone call, email, etc is being recorded, making
it easier for the government to track down anyone that they want. Americans privacy is being
violated very similarly to the privacy violations in 1984, a novel written by George Orwell. In the
present day and in 1984 people could be easily tracked down and are being watched every second,
of every day. Personally I believe that the privacy shouldn't be violated for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If anyone ever started to act suspicious or do unusual activity, the FBI will then pull up that person's
cell phone file, and review every text message, phone call, email, etc. Thanks to a guy named
Edward Snowden these files were released to show everyone the secret activity the government does
behind the people's backs. Edward Snowden worked for the NSA and had many important roles.
When Snowden came across these files he felt the need the documents because he believed that
these types of decisions should be determined by the public. And just like Edward Snowden I do
strongly believe that the government should not have made the decision of recording private
information without notifying us, the citizens. Even though these actions are meant to protect and to
prevent, however this is a total violation of privacy which is not ok.
In conclusion, every person with a cellular device does have a file that the government has just in
case. Cell phones are losing it's original purpose and should now be considered a tracking device. If
the government kept this secret, who knows what else they could be hiding. Personally it's
frightening to know that the government knows where you are, who you were with, how long you
were with that person, and when you went back home. Just like in 1984 you never know when Big
Brother is

What Makes the Totalitarian Government in George Orwell's...
George Orwell's 1984
War is Peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. These are the beliefs that the citizens of
Oceania, in the novel titled 1984, written by George Orwell, live by. In this novel, Oceania, one of
the three remaining world super powers, is a totalitarian, a society headed by 'Big Brother' and his
regime, known as the ministries of Truth, Love, and Peace. A totalitarian government is defined as a
government characterized by a political authority which exercises absolute and centralized control,
and in which the state regulates every realm of life. This is the type of world that the citizens of
Oceania must live in, ruled by fear and under force every day. The names of the different ministries
for example, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been
grouped along different lines.? Although throughout the story, the conditions of these wars were
constantly changing, it made no difference to the masses, and the current ?truth? was all that
mattered. ?Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with
Eurasia? (Orwell, pg 35). The truth is whatever the government wants it to be, and the people accept
it at face value, a concept cleverly worded as ?reality control.? (Orwell, pg. 36) Likewise in today?s
society, even though the people live under the rule of a democratic republic in the U.S., a large
portion of the news that we receive is distorted and filtered, many times the truth is not what it
appears to be. Being a democracy does not stop that from happening. Furthermore, like the citizens
of Oceania, we as citizens often accept the information that we receive from the media as absolute
truth, not questioning what we hear, even though we have the privilege of doing so. In the
totalitarian society of 1984, the government alters history constantly and changes it to fit the
predictions and needs of the party, so that they always come out ahead. The Party destroys any
evidence that the past has been altered, and asserts absolute correctness and truth. One might argue
that it would be impossible to get rid of all past evidence in today?s world, because

A Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
In the world of sex, drugs, and baby cloning you are going to be in many situations where you feel
like the world we live in should be different. In the story Brave New World, they had sex with
multiple partners along with a very bad use of drugs.
It is weird that Aldous Huxley wrote this book in 1931 about the world he was living in during that
time and how it is similar to the world we live in today. Nowadays, drugs are still being used and
people are still engaging in sexual encounters with multiple partners. Things are no different than
they use to be. People still to this day are using drugs and committing adultery as if there aren't any
diseases out there. In the story they introduced a drug named Soma. This particular drug was the
narcotic they used to escape the world they lived in.
Aldous Huxley did not like being in London because he felt the people there were basically all the
same. Aldous Huxley was characterized by people as being very weird to people because he didn't
like to do the things they did. He became so weird to people that the press and news reporters
became interested in talking to him in order to find out more about him. I have a connection with
this particular story because the world I'm living in today is based on the same things he described.
Sex is the main thing teenagers care about nowadays. In my generation kids look at you funny or
think you are weird if you do not have sex or have sex as often as they do. It seems as if people

George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four 1984 Essay
Living in a society with limited freedom of expression is not, in any case, enjoyable. A totalitarian
system is a good example of such a society, because although it provides control for the people, it
can deny them a great deal of freedom to express themselves. The fictional society in George
Orwell's 1984 also stands as a metaphor for a Totalitarian society. Communication, personal beliefs,
and individual loyalty to the government are all controlled by the inner party which governs the
people of Oceania in order to keep them from rebelling. Current society in North America is much
more democratic. It contrasts with Orwell's society of 1984 because communication, personal
beliefs and the people's loyalty to the government are all ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The concept of Newspeak is designed to control personal beliefs of the citizens by limiting their
form of expression as Syme explains. But when the governing system is not followed, Thought
Police are used to prevent thoughts that oppose the nation. "How often, or on what system, the
Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they
watched everybody all the time" (Orwell, 6). There is no doubt that through both Newspeak and the
Thought Police the system of government in 1984 has adequately prevented the people from
thinking against it. When all this surveillance is placed on the people, they learn to comply with
their country and eventually begin to value it automatically. In our society personal belief is
expressed in any way, shape or form. From the different religious options that we can choose from,
to the way we believe our country should be run, we have an impact on it. We choose for ourselves
what we believe. If we do not agree with a certain point that our governments make we can act on it.
As an example, demonstrations and protests are often held which counter certain governmental
policies; laws or propositions are often spoken out against in public. The fact that these rebellious
actions are not punished by the government proves that the government is much more lenient than
that of 1984. The

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' The First Place '
The main purpose of an exposition is to bring out the relationship between the book and law. It not
only takes into consideration the laws that are coded, but also the basic and natural laws that govern
our everyday lives. This part shall highlight the reasons as to why the novel was written in the first
place. It shall answer questions like why did the author bother to pick up a pen, articulate his
thoughts into words, and take time to write such a lengthy piece in an organised manner. This part
calls for exploration and asks the reader to delve into the intricacies of the thought process and
beliefs of the author.
It is said that George Orwell underwent a huge deal of trouble, not only mentally, but physically as
well, during the period ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First I spent five years in an unsuitable profession (The Indian Imperial Police, in Burma), and then
I underwent poverty and the sense of failure. This increased my natural hatred of authority and made
me for the first time fully aware of the existence of the working classes, and the job in Burma had
given me some understanding of the nature of imperialism: but these experiences were not enough
to give me an accurate political orientation. Then came Hitler, the Spanish Civil War, etc. By the end
of 1935 I had still failed to reach a firm decision. The Spanish war and other events in 1936–37
turned the scale and thereafter I knew where I stood. Every line of serious work that I have written
since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic
socialism, as I understand it. It seems to me nonsense, in a period like our own, to think that one can
avoid writing of such subjects. Everyone writes of them in one guise or another. It is simply a
question of which side one takes and what approach one follows. And the more one is conscious of
one 's political bias, the more chance one has of acting politically without sacrificing one 's aesthetic
and intellectual integrity."
"...I write because there is some lie that I want to expose, some fact to which I want to draw
attention, and my initial concern is to get a hearing. ...Of late years I have tried to write less
picturesquely and more exactly. ANIMAL FARM was the first book in

Brave New World, And 1984 Replace The Existence Of God
Throughout history, most religions have created a belief system where people are free to worship
and praise God 's existence, as well as acknowledge that they are constantly being watched by him.
This confidence in God creates a sense of security and hope for the community that there is a
purpose for their existence, and the world does not come to a tragic end after death. Yevgeny
Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell, authors of WE, Brave New World, and 1984 replace
the existence of God with leaders or objects that symbolize their new "God". Although the concepts
of adoration and complete omniscience are still relevant throughout these novels, the "God's"
created are merely based off of the governments beliefs and tactics. In these novels, the faces of God
are simply the government in disguise; giving the people a sense of comfort by seeing intangible
figures and faces, parallel to their old Gods. There is an innate inclination to believe in something
larger than oneself, hence why the people are forced to believe in these government aliases. In each
of the novels, the authors develop governments that create belief systems to match up with their
ultimate goals, as well as to execute control, thereby keeping themselves in the seat of absolute
power. In WE, Zamyatin creates a society known as One State that revolves not around the
individual, but around the collective we, with the Benefactor in God–like status at the center. The
Benefactor possesses qualities that the

Media Manipulation Exposed in George Orwell's Shooting an...
Media Manipulation Exposed in George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" The phrase "the power of
the press" is used often, but what exactly is the power of the press? Since the beginning of news
reporting, it's been known that what actually gets into the news reports is monitored and carefully
picked by higher authorities. What isn't widely known, however, is that the media can use specific
wording and phrases that, on the surface, look like normal news coverage, but are actually a
technique of the media to control the images people see and the words they hear and read. From this,
people then form their ideals, but are these actually ideals of those people if the media from which
they based them off of was controlled to begin with? It is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
On a daily basis, Orwell was perceived as an intruder upon the Burmese land by the natives, but on
this day, he is "momentarily worth watching" (Orwell 337). Taking up an elephant rifle, Orwell went
forward to do something about the elephant, though he wasn't sure exactly what that would be. He
didn't want to kill the elephant, but now that he held the rifle, he felt that the Burmese had the power
and were forcing him along: Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the
unarmed native crowd–seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd
puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind... [The leader] becomes a sort of
hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib. For it is the condition of his rule that
he shall spend his life in trying to impress the "natives," and so in every crisis he has got to do what
the "natives" expect of him (Orwell 337). Orwell's perspective was that because the Burmese
expected him to shoot the elephant, he had no other choice but to do so. His own ideals of how
shooting the elephant was wrong were overcastted by the Burmese "media," who urged him along
and condoned the death of the elephant. It is not evident whether or not the natives were aware of
their power over Orwell. The media as we know it today, however, did realize its power over the

1984 And Brave New World Essay
Brave New World and 1984
As I read Brave New World and 1984, I noticed how some of Aldous Huxley and
George Orwell's prophecies are becoming true. As science and technology progresses,
we have the opportunity to alter few aspects of our lives, even though our freedom and
privacy may be in jeopardy.
In Brave New World, science allows babies to be artificially produced in a
laboratory. Nowadays, parents who cannot conceive children are also able to artificially
produce their children with the help of science and the genes of both parents. As science
advances, the parents may even be able to reform the genes of their baby in order to have
that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though it is not as
extreme as in the Brave New World, I feel that we are also being conditioned. It is more
obvious now. When we watch commercials on television, we are conditioned to buy the
products and believe that by buying that particular brand of clothing we will look better
and be well liked. The ads are harmless as long as we do not sacrifice the important idea
that we genuinely want the product and that we are still making the decision to buy it.
A similarity between Oceania, in 1984, and our country today is that the caste
system still exists. Most of the power belongs to the rich, or the Inner Party. The middle

class, or the Outer Party, are trying to become part of the higher class. While the poor, or
the Proles, are working hard in order to make ends meet and just want to be left alone.
Like Orwell, I feel that the caste system will always exist.
Also, the citizens of Oceania are constantly being monitored by the government.
We are also being monitored. There are cameras everywhere, even though most of the
time we are not aware of it. When we go to the store, the surveillance cameras are there
to make sure we do not steal anything. When we go to the bank, cameras are watching us
make our transactions. In some cities, cameras may also be watching us as we cross the
street or get into our car. What is next? Cameras in our homes?
It is

Analysis Of The Article ' Shooting An Elephant ' By George...
It is often said that people try to look for their benefits and reputation in the society, which results
into "evilness". Therefore, people start to choose easy paths to get their work done. However, people
may choose the wrong path and would not recognize it because people only see their benefits. John
Berger, the author of an article called "Hiroshima", argues that evilness has increased largely that
people cannot see the actual matter in the society. He shows that people know that "evil" exists.
However, instead of spreading "innocence" in the society, people are spreading "evilness". In the
article "Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell, he states that an elephant had gone mad and killed
a man. The British officer does not want to shoot the elephant but he shot the elephant because of
his reputation and his powers. Orwell argues that a people are "evil" for many centuries. However,
people's "evilness" reveal when they start to look for their benefits because of their selfishness.
Berger argues that people may reveal their "evilness" under certain circumstances and Orwell would
agree with Berger's idea because he also states that people start to act selfishly when "evilness" takes
over "innocence". Orwell uses personal experience to criticize people's intentions of "selfishness"
and "evilness", while Berger not only uses credibility to show selfishness of people but also uses
emotional appeal to show people's "evilness".
Berger uses credibility to argue that "innocence"

Capital Punishment in the Work of George Orwell, H.L....
Capital Punishment in the Work of George Orwell, H.L. Mencken, and Norman Mailer
Capital punishment in the essays by George Orwell, H.L. Mencken, and Norman Mailer was a
necessary evil to deter crime. These authors incorporated the use of alcohol or drugs as mind–
altering chemicals to relieve the pressures of the characters involved in death due to capital
punishment. Chemicals such as drugs and alcohol can be used for the pleasure of relieving stress, a
means to forget, or a way to subdue personal beliefs as the authors have illustrated. The pleasure of
relieving stress in George Orwell's essay "A Hanging" was detailed by his thoughts written as one of
the executioners. This character drank alcohol to relieve ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The uses of mind–altering chemicals, H.L. Mencken's essay "Hangings I have Known" illustrates
the repression of memory using a young journalist precisely eighteen years, ten months and sixteen
days old (pg 92) when he witnesses his first execution as a reporter. He narrates the inebriated state
of the "sheriff whose responsibility it was to spring the trap". (pg 92) The sheriff's drinking was to
diminish mental anguish he put on himself to a point where he became " virtually helpless, the other
sheriffs would help pull the trap, but the sheriff was quite unable to tie the knot, bind the candidate,
or carry on with the other duties under his responsibility". (pg 92) "After the hangings the sheriff
was assisted out of the jail yard by his deputies, and departed at once for Atlantic City, where he dug
in for a week of nightmare" (pg 92). The sheriff was written as a person not able to accept the act of
capital punishment or his memories so he attempts to suppress them with alcohol.
The final use of chemicals was by Gary Gilmore in Norman Mailer's essay "Let's Do It" to suppress
his personal beliefs. Unable to say anything profound to the warden due to the amount of

George Orwell 's Animal Farm
American Journalist Carl Hiaasen once said, "Good satire comes from anger. It comes from a sense
of injustice, that there are wrongs in the world that need to be fixed (www.brainyquote.com). In
George Orwell's novel, Animal Farm, Orwell fuels his inspiration for the novel from his anger and
dislike towards the misuse of governmental power, and the corruption that occurs when the
government has too much power. The pigs in this novel represent a government 's leaders and the
effects of what happens when a government gains too much power and influence over its people.
The pigs, especially their leader Napoleon, misuse their power and use it to take advantage of the
animal with a lower intelligence level. Orwell satirizes Napoleon by giving him the characteristics
of a ruthless dictator who uses education, violence, and rhetoric to control the other animals on the
farm.
The pigs use rhetoric to convince the animals to adopt Napoleon as their leader and remain loyal to
him. The animals on the farm spend their lives being a slave to the farm. Napoleon, however, abuses
the animals ' loyalty, and even though they spend every day of their lives trying to please him, they
are never good enough for Napoleon. They are constantly reminded that "Bravery is not enough...
loyalty and obedience are more important" (55). After the deadly battle that allowed Animal Farm to
be a free state, Squealer, Napoleon's messenger, convinces the farm animals that their bravery in the
battle was not

Animal Farm By George Orwell
The ninety–five page novella, Animal Farm, written by George Orwell. Aimed at teenagers and
adults, it cleverly shows the flaws within society and how we will never change. This timeless
classic was converted into an hour and ten minute long film (in 1954) which is suitable and
supposedly appealing to young children.
However, the conversion between the novella and the cartoon meant having to cut down and alter
some of the storyline and characters within the novella to suit this age range but at the same time,
trying not to lose the basic structure of the novella and the messages given out by George Orwell
throughout the book.
I felt that on a whole, the cartoon version of 'Animal Farm ' did not maintain the textual integrity to
the novella. However, you find that this is the case with most films that have been converted from
books. Although the basic storyline of the novella was suitable for children, the meaning behind it
was beyond the understanding of this age range. I feel that the producers took on a very hard task to
try and convert this high standard novella into a film for all ages.
The purpose of the novella was clear, it is a piece of political satire, mainly concerning the Russian
Revolution. I did not feel however, that this came across in the film in any way. The film was clearly
aimed at children, as the simplicity of the converted storyline was obvious. Although they kept to
the basic structure of the novella, I felt that they did not successfully altar

The Dangers Of Totalitarianism Essay Example

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Laura Benitez

More from Laura Benitez (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Dangers Of Totalitarianism Essay Example