International Conference on Pangasinan Carino and Bitonio.pptx

1. 150 mph
New engine installed
Perfect for travelling
THE SUSTAINABLE
LIVELIHOOD PROGRAM OF
THE DSWD: IT’S SOCIO-
ECONOMIC IMPACT ON THE
BENEFICIARIES IN
PANGASINAN
International Conference on Pangasinan
and Bulosan Studies
Gilberto S. Carino, DPA
Author
Josefina B. Bitonio, DPA
Co- Author

2. Background
Feature Two
- a capability building program for the poor and disadvantaged
households to improve their socio- economic condition towards
self-sufficiency level of well being (DSWD-SLP,2011).

3. Executive Order No. 221 s. 2003 –
Convergence Framework for three Core
Poverty Reduction Projects Pantawid
Pamilya Program (Conditional Cash
Transfer), KALAHI-CIDDS (Community
Driven Development) and Sustainable
Livelihood Program (DSWD, 2003)
Administrative Order No. 22
series of 2019 or The
Department of Social Welfare
and Development Research
and Evaluation Agenda 2019
-2022
The SWDI has two major components: (1) economic
sufficiency (employment, employable skills, income,
social security, and access to financial institutions),
which was used to measure the economic status, and
(2) social adequacy (health, education, housing, role
performance of family and family awareness) to
measures the social status of the program
beneficiaries.

4. The study assessed the socio-economic impact of the Sustainable
Livelihood Program of the Department of Social Welfare and Development
(DSWD) on the program beneficiaries to enhance the implementation of the
program in the Province of Pangasinan.
Sub-problems:
1) The profile of the respondents in terms of a) Level of Well Being; b)
Size of Family; c) Program Track Availed; d) Type of Availment; e) Type
of Enterprise/Employment; and f) Enterprise/Employment Status.
2) Assessed their socio-economic status and significant difference of the
Sustainable Livelihood Program beneficiaries in the year 2015 and
after availment of the program in terms of two major component:
economic sufficiency (Employable Skills, Employment, Income, and
Social Security) and Social Adequacy (Health, Housing, Education,
Role Performance of Family, and Family Awareness of Relevant Social
Issues).

5. 3) Assessed the relationship between the profile and impact of the program along: a)Economic; and
b) Social.
4) Based on its findings, a proposed innovative development program can be recommended to
further enhance the implementation of the Sustainable Livelihood Program in the Province of
Pangasinan.
Sub-problems:

6. The study used paired
Samples T-Test, Chi-
square, Frequency,
and Percentage as the
statistical data analysis
tools.
425 respondents
using Yamane’s
(1967:86) with 95%
Confidence Level from
20 selected
City/Municipalities in
the Province
Pangasinan served
SLP beneficiaries in
the year 2015
The study used the
quantitative
descriptive research
method using a cross-
sectional survey
design to determine
the program's impact
on served
beneficiaries in
implementing the
DSWD’s Sustainable
Livelihood Program.
METHODOLOGY

7. Level of Well Being
Majority (76.2%) of respondents
belong to a subsistence level
Size of Family
Most respondents (56.5%)
belong to an extended family
(above six members),
Program Track Availed
Majority of the respondents
availed of the microenterprise
development track (93.2%),
Modalities
Most of the respondents served
with Skills Training (54.1%)
Type of Availment
Majority of the respondents availed SLP
modality by individual beneficiaries(81.9%)
Type of Enterprise
Majority of the beneficiaries have
established enterprises (95.1%), and
few have gainful employment (4.9%).
Enterprise/ Employment Status
Majority of the respondents were
operational or employed (63.3%)
Reason/s if Closed/ Unemployed
Most reported of having closed enterprises or
being unemployed were pest infestations
(12.2%)
1. Profile of the Respondents

8. 2. Economic Status of the Sustainable Livelihood Program in the year 2015
and after availment of the Program

9. Tony Robbins
3. Comparison in the Economic Status of the Sustainable Livelihood Program
Beneficiaries in the year 2015 and after availment of the Program

10. 4. Social Status of the
Sustainable Livelihood
Program in the year 2015
and after and after
Availment of the Program

11. 5. Comparison in the Social Status of
the Sustainable Livelihood Program
Beneficiaries in the year 2015 and after
Availment of the Program

12. Size of family and type of
Availment are significantly
correlated with the impact
of the program
Significantly correlated with
the impact of the program
along Employment.
Enterprise/employment
status has significant
relationship with the
impact of the program
The size of family affects
the impact of the SLP
program along Health
No significant
relationship between the
profile and impact of the
program along Housing
significantly correlated
with that of the impact of
the program along
Education
6. Relationship between the Profile of the Respondents and Impact of
the Program
Employable Skills
Employment
Income
Health
Housing
Education
significantly correlated
with that of the impact
of the program along
Family Awareness of
Relevant Social Issues
Family Awareness of
Relevant Social Issues

13. 7. Proposed Innovative Development Program to Further Enhance the Implementation of the
Sustainable Livelihood Program
in the Province of Pangasinan
Key Result Areas Program / Activities Strategies
Economic Status
Income
(2015-HS; 2019-NS)
A. Clear Cut Guidelines in the
Implementation
• Local Government Unit- Staffing
complement per City/
Municipalities for monitoring
• Install online reporting tools
accessible thru mobile devices
• Regular Auditing to avoid
mismanagement
• Conduct online assistance on
product trading and retailing
• Forge Memorandum of
Agreement to Local
Government Unit
• Conduct capacity building to
designated livelihood staff and
key officers on organizational
management, financial
management and use of online
platforms for products trading
and retailing

14. Key Result Areas Program / Activities Strategies
Economic Status
Income
(2015-HS; 2019-NS)
B. Expand the implementation of
the Program
• Intensify partnership
engagement with employer that
offers local and online jobs
• Conduct support skills
enhancement training on
unemployed served beneficiaries
• Set a sustainable amount of
assistance based on size of family
• Forge partnership engagement
on government institutions and
private employer that offers
training cum employment
scheme

15. Program / Activities Strategies
Social Status
-Role Performance of
Family
(2015-HS; 2019-MS)
A. Intensify Career Counseling
and Job Orientation
• Local Government Unit- Staffing
complement per City/
Municipalities for monitoring
• Conduct online seminar for
career counseling and
personality development
• Forge Memorandum of
Agreement to Local Government
Unit
• Conduct capacity building to
designated livelihood staff and
forge partnership engagement to
private institutions that offers free
online services
Social Status
-Role Performance
of Family
(2015-HS; 2019-MS)
B. Close mentoring and
technical support
• Install online coaching,
mentoring and provision of
technical assistance
• Conduct learning and
development intervention/
capability training for problem
management

16. The SLP beneficiaries are family resilience who believed in
the program with socio-economic impact. There is a various
economic sufficiency in the implementation of the Sustainable
Livelihood program between 2015 to 2019. The program's
size of the family, type of availment, and track availed
positively influenced their economic and social status. The
indicators show that the SLP beneficiaries' social status
peaked, except for family role performance. This indicator
affects the operation of their businesses, which is the ability
to discern problems inside the family.

17. 2018
Fortify the implementation of the SLP program by
facilitating opportunities for development and
management of resources viable for micro-
enterprises and employment facilitation
2019
Rigid auditing to really attain
the purpose of the program.
2020
The DSWD continuously review the
guidelines of the implementation
based on the regular monitoring and
evaluation particularly in the selection
of the SLP beneficiaries; its operation
and procedures
Recommendations
The proposed innovative
development program is
encouraged to be implemented
with the approval of the higher
authorities for its adoption in the
implementation of the SLP
program
Intensify the capacity building
activities through mass training
and workshops with the help of
the other agencies such as
DepEd and LGU for the
enhancement of the skills of the
SLP beneficiaries in the locality.
Proper dissemination of
information is encouraged to
facilitate the access of the SLP
beneficiaries to various
employment opportunities with
partners

18. Shape, engage and
drive the society to
move forward progress
Social
Responsibility