Gould And Nietzsche Question Religion And Nature In Suffering

Stephen Jay Gould And Friedrich Nietzsche
Religion Verses Nature If God is good and if creation reveals his goodness, why do nature's victims suffer? Is God dead? These are the questions that
the two essays from Stephen Jay Gould and Friedrich Nietzsche ask and attempt to answer. Stephen Jay Gould was a well–known professor of geology,
zoology and curator of invertebrate paleontology in the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University. Gould feels that animals are too
complex to be compared to humans and deciding what is good and evil. Friedrich Nietzsche was one of the most influential German philosophers.
Nietzsche feels as though God is dead and the commitment to religion is contradicting instincts of nature. In Stephen Jay Gould's essay "Nonmoral
Nature" he feels that human beings should not be compared to animals when it comes to morality. Charles Darwin was an English naturalist trained as a
minister, which Stephen Jay Gould mentions in his teachings. Charles Darwin famously known for his theory of branching pattern of evolution did not
see conflict between his theories and religious beliefs. Gould feels that just like Darwin humans should separate that of scientific fact from religious
beliefs and morals. (Gould 636) Theologians in the nineteenth century would disagree with Stephen Gould but that is only because their thought
process was different. Nineteenth century theologians anthropomorphized such predators which made them look evil as if they were human beings
acting out brutality, when in
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

edmundlear Edmund of King Lear as Nietzsche's Free...
Edmund of King Lear as Nietzsche's Free Spirit
In King Lear, Shakespeare creates a brilliant tragedy whose plot is driven primarily by its villains. Of these, Edmund stands alone as a man who
makes his fortune, surrounded by those who seize fortune only when it is handed to them. Shakespeare's ability to create a vivid, living character in
the space of a few lines of speech triumphs in Edmund, who embodies a totally different moral system than that of Shakespeare's era. Three centuries
later, Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy of the Free Spirit would respect these values.
Like Edmund, Nietzsche's unorthodox views have been deemed villainous ever since the time they were written. The Free Spirit is defined not ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Edmund, these characteristics are obvious – he questions the world created by men, but at the same time reflects that he is bound to Nature.
Nietzsche likewise saw the rigid values of Christianity as false ones, clumsily laid over man's true, changing nature. "The hierarchy of the good,
however, is not fixed and identical at all times. If someone prefers revenge to justice, he is moral by the standard of an earlier culture, yet by the
standard of the present culture he is immoral."1
When my dimensions are as well compact,
My mind as generous, and my shape as true,
As honest madam's issue? Why brand they us
With base? with baseness? bastardy? base, base?
Who, in the lusty stealth of nature, take
More composition and fierce quality
Than doth, within a dull, stale, tired bed,

Go to the creating a whole tribe of fops,
Got 'tween asleep and wake? (I.2.7–15)
Edmund continues by expressing his outrage at the labeling of a man who is just as rightly made up as another, but is forced into a second–rate status
by a society ruled by the dull and stale. Here he also acknowledges his humanity, but distinguishes himself from others by a quality of fierceness.
Again, Nietzsche's ideas shine through. Edmund cannot conceive why his station must be defined for him, when he is a fiercer human than others.
Nietzsche's Will to Power follows this reasoning closely. The

Nietzsche's Genealogy Of Morals
During the late 19th century, Friedrich Nietzsche examined the history of morals in his Genealogy of Morals. In his work, Nietzsche reveals the
origin of morality, and he goes further to tear down the basis of Christianity and Kant's Moral Law to show that there is a plurality of conflicting
morals in society. Max Weber, who was a philosopher greatly influenced by Nietzsche, writes further on the plurality declaring that there is a
polytheism that is the result of many conflicting values. Weber concludes that there is no science of ethics after Nietzsche, so there is no way to
determine the "correct" value system. There is currently polytheism and a plurality of values that will not be resolved because all values are valid
despite them conflicting... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this new polytheism, "conflict rages between different gods, and it will go on for all time. It is as it was in antiquity before the world had been
divested of the magic of its gods and demons, only in a different sense" (Science as a Vocation p. 23). The contemporary polytheism is similar to the
ancient one in that it consists of conflict; however, in neo–polytheism, the gods are impersonal forces. There is no magic or personal gods in this new
system. There is just conflicting value systems where each value system is equally valid. This is a difficult reality for people to digest due to the
blinding strength the Christian church has on people. Christianity led people to believe that there was only one way to live. Any other value
system was wrong in the eyes of Christians. People will become more aware that there is a plurality of value systems, and that each set of values
can be considered just as valid as the next: "The destiny of our culture, however, is that we shall once again become more clearly conscious of this
situation after a millennium in which our allegedly or supposedly exclusive reliance on the glorious pathos of the Christian ethic had blinded us to it"
(Science as a Vocation p. 24). People will learn to move away from the ethics laid forth by Christianity and, in the face of polytheism, make their own

The Genealogy Of Morals By Friedrich Nietzsche Essay
PHIL 2030 Final Essay
Alex Vanden Heuvel, Professor Lay, Fall Semester 2016
Responding to Prompt 1
On the Genealogy of Morals by Friedrich Nietzsche is typically listed as one of the most important philosophical works of the modern era. It is only
modern, of course, to philosophical standards, being a mere 129 years old. It is also one of the most controversial works of its time, having the
dubious distinction of being connected to Nazi ideology; it also has a not very subtle racist, sexist, and Darwinist bent that is a reflection of Nietzsche
himself. That being said, I think that it is also serially misunderstood. Nietzsche directly mentions the role of interpretation in ethical discourse in the
Genealogy, and the interpretive element factors heavily into one's understanding of the polemic and by extension, ethics philosophy as a whole.
Throughout the book, Nietzsche uses interpretation as a tool in itself to make a constructivist and existentialist argument about the history of ethics as
whole. His idea that man has used interpretation throughout history, and the interpretive elements in Genealogy outside of the historical analysis, seem
to say that almost all ethics are derived from interpretation and therefore constructivist in nature, which is a heavily existentialist argument. For
example, the entirety of the first essay is based heavily upon the role of interpretation in the development of the early ethical systems that Nietzsche
argues are built on the

Friedrich Nietzsche: One of the Greatest Thinkers of All Time
Friedrich Nietzsche was without a doubt one of the most influential thinkers of the 19th century. He was a man who ventured to question all of man's
beliefs. He was out to seek the important questions in life, not always their answers. Some consider Nietzsche to be one of the first existentialist
philosophers along with SГёren Kierkegaard. He was the inspiration for many philosophers, poets, sociologists, and psychologists including Sigmund
Freud. His goal to seek explanations for society's commonly accepted values was an inspiration for Freud's psychoanalysis theory1. Nietzsche's life as
well as his theories such as the will to power, the Гњbermensch, eternal recurrence, and his thoughts on religion all had a momentous affect on 19th and
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He went on to the University of Leipzig in 1865 where he started to gain a reputation for his essays on 6th century poets. In May of 1869, Nietzsche
was offered a position as a professor at the University of Basel although he met none of the formal qualifications usually required. He took the position
and was named a university professor at the young age of 24, showing his astonishing brilliance and intelligence. At 25, he served as a hospital
attendant during the Franco–Prussian War. It is thought that he may have contracted a syphilitic infection from the war. His poor health throughout his
life reached a climax in January 1889 when he collapsed in a street in Turin. After this collapse he entered a vegetated state where he suffered from
strokes until finally he died on August 25, 1900. During Nietzsche's period of insanity he was taken care of by his sister Elisabeth. She is thought to
have looked over Nietzsche's works closely and even tampered with them. After his death she even published a book from his notes called The Will to
Power. Some do not regard this publication as authentic Nietzsche thought, but some ideas in it, including his view of power, appear in other authentic
publications. Whether he died of syphilis, an inherited insanity, or another unknown cause, there is little debate that his lifetime accomplishments set
the stage for a long list of influential thinkers and events including

Friedrich Nietzsche : Good And Evil
Friedrich Nietzsche life, and his views on the world and the way he sees it and lives it, throughout his time. Nietzsche believes that "god is dead
because we killed him". Nietzsche used to practice Christianity but gave it up because he believes faith doesn't offer support.so he's anti–religious.
Nietzsche believes that Christianity support the weak. And the will to power is in you yourself. He also believes that what was considered good is
now bad and what was considered bad is now good. And I would agree with these statements.
Nietzsche will to power,
What Nietzsche means when he says what's now good is considered bad, and what was once bad now considered good is that the things we would
consider bad like, pain weakness, theft, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
in order to be set free and live life happily Nietzsche is saying you shouldn't live upon them rules. "To fully grasp its essence, the human body to be
taken as a guide, because the body is wisdom and reason, define it as intelligent dynamic, organic faculty to understand and to think, think the whole
organism and it is possible to speak of a mind unconscious body." (philosophy.edu). Nietzsche believes the will to truth lies in a connection between
truth and God philosophers have bought into a religious ideal which has caused them to develop a blind reference for truth, making truth their God. As
he writes in Genealogy of Morals, III, 25:
"That which constrains idealists of knowledge, this unconditional will to truth, is faith in the ascetic ideal itself even if as an unconscious imperative –
don't be deceived about that – it is faith in a metaphysical value, the absolute value of truth, sanctioned and guaranteed by this ideal alone (it stands or
falls with this ideal)." What Nietzsche is saying is that will to truth lies within your mind and your morals.
Nietzsche believes that Christianity pity's the weak, meaning most people live their lives following religions and the don't really see what they can be
doing without faith. He wants us to overcome and believes we need new human values.
"These nay–sayers and outsiders of today who are unconditional on one point –– their

Analysis of Friedrich NietzscheВґs Book 5 of The Gay...
Friedrich Nietzsche's own skepticism symbolized the secular changes in contemporary Western civilization, in which he details mankind's break away
from faith into a new rule of chaos. In Book 5 of The Gay Science, Nietzsche establishes that "God is dead", meaning that modern Europe has
abandoned religion in favor of rationality and science (Nietzsche 279). From this death, the birth of a 'new' infinite blossoms in which the world is
open to an unlimited amount of interpretations that do not rely on the solid foundations of faith in religion or science. However, in contrast to the other
philosophers of his age such as Immanuel Kant and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Nietzsche deviates from the omniscient determinism of history
towards a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite such claims, Nietzsche criticizes this mistaken idea that the knowledge of the universe can be comprehended by any method; he argues that not
even the "most scrupulously conscientious analysis and self–examination of the intellect" cannot successfully interpret the progressive history of the
world as "the human intellect cannot avoid seeing itself in [only] its perspectives" (Nietzsche 336). To Nietzsche, Kant and Hegel's attempts to find
truth in history is faulty because faith is just now found in science and reasoning rather than religion. What Kant and Hegel fail to realize is that the
human race's separation from this faith gave rise to "our new 'infinite'", in which "the world has become 'infinite' for [humanity] all over again,
inasmuch as we cannot reject the possibility that it may include infinite interpretations" (Nietzsche 336). Thus the new infinite is self–consciously
made by the individual members of humanity itself, as we can now independently interpret the world ourselves as we see fit. Nietzsche declares that
even if some of these interpretations may include "too much devilry, stupidity and foolishness", it does not matter because it does not rely on faith
(Nietzsche 336). The new infinite that arises is ours, in which the abundance of perspectives is too overwhelming for any scholar to give meaning to
such chaos. There is no logical reason how such disorder should

Wilhelm Nietzsche Research Paper
Life
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was a 19th Century German philosopher, philologist and a founder of Existentialism. He was born on October 15, 1844
in RГ¶cken bei LГјtzen, Prussia (modern–day Germany). ("Friedrich Nietzsche")
After graduating high school in 1864, Nietzsche studied theology and classical philology at the University of Bonn and even had thoughts of joining
the priesthood. One semester later, however, he quit his theological studies, renouncedreligion and shifted his focus to philology. Through his readings
of various philosophical works and Europe's growing interest with science, Darwinism, and the overall rejection of tradition, Nietzsche began to pursue
philosophy. In 1868, he graduated and accepted a classical philology position ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Гњbermensch is the person who lives life to the full according to his own values, a free spirit, uninhibited and confident. The Гњbermensch is
mankind pursuing a new way ahead in total freedom and without the need for God. This idea is shared in existentialist view of the importance of the
personal development of morals. It also touches on the idea that since there is no God, embracing existence is the only way to counter this nothingness.
In addition, in the concept of the Гњbermensch emphasizes action, freedom, decisions and the individual definition of the meaning of life. ("Friedrich

Examples Of Overcoming Nihilism
Overcoming Nihilism according to Nietzsche
In this paper, I will explore Nietzsche's considerations towards nihilism and the philosopher's views on overcoming it. My conclusion is that
Nietzsche's strategy of overcoming nihilism is indeed viable and a potential to be successful given the pragmatic nature of the individual. I will
investigate further on the reasons why this is the case. My assumptions in examples below are based on an application of the Nietzsche's solution on a
reasonably mentally stable individual.
First, let's assume Friedrich Nietzsche's definition of nihilism. According to Nietzsche:
1)"Every belief, every considering–something–true, is necessarily false because there simply is no true world". "...That there is no truth, that there is
no absolute nature of things nor a "thing–in–itself." (Will to Power)
2)[Nihilism] "...places the value of things precisely in the lack of any reality corresponding to these values and in their being merely a symptom of
strength on the part of the value–positers, a simplification for the sake of life." (Will to Power) Therefore, an individual must accept absolute nihilism
where there is no pre–determined higher meaning to life, no goals an individual is destined to achieve and no social constructs to follow. Building
upon this argument, Nietzsche elaborates in Will to Power that "Nihilism is . . . not only the belief that everything deserves to perish; but one actually
puts one's shoulder to the plough; one destroys".

The Geneaology Of Morals, By Friedrich Nietzsche
Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher, wrote on European history and its undergone of harmful development, conditions had never been worse, in
the late nineteenth century. Believed institutions and movements were engaged in reducing human beings to a lower level of existence, more
common; and that any individual displaying qualities as srenght, could be vilified and shackled. He blamed this on the mineteenth century not have
produced many mighty monuments as they were capable of creating. Nietzsche blamed the Jews for the wrong turn in western civviliation The
Geneaology of Morals (1887) is Nietzsche's elaboration of ideas, pertaining European history, concerning ideals.
Priest are the most evil enemies to have, they are the most impotent. Their impotence make their hate so violent. Greatest and most intelligent haters
have been priests. Example, Jews have avenge themselves on their enemies by inverting their values, spiritual vengeance. Jews inverted aristocratic
value equations, to all eternity, the evil, cursed and damed. While the poor, powerlesss are truly blessed.
It was the Jews who started the slave revolt in morals, a history that has triumphed. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Slave ethics are basically negative or reacting, originating in the denial of everything, while opposing and oppressing everything external. On the
other hand, master morality does not concern itself with it outside sources. Ancient Greek words denoting lower orders of society are variants of the
word "unhappy." But the nobles are naturally happy. A man of malice distors to present the noble negatively, boosting his confidence. Nietzsche
basically says the noble man is an honest man, refined, whom does not hold resentment. The noble man "respect(s) his enemy," (449) which
transposes to a form of love, regarding him as the "Good One." The "rancorous person" is deceptive, cleverer, since he is always

The Rules Of Oppression By Friedrich Nietzsche
The Rules of Oppression For this assignment, I was asked to create an essay demonstrating my knowledge from the semester, by elaborating on the
topics discussed in class on philosophers of morality. The philosopher that maximized my attention was Friedrich Nietzsche. Per Internet
Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Nietzsche wrote on "on truth, morality, language, aesthetics, cultural theory, history, nihilism, power, consciousness,
and the meaning of existence." (Wilkerson) Nietzsche's work on morality, titled Master and Slave Morality implemented questions I have
pondered in regards to the choice of who controls power in the world, because it is often that those control power assumed their position by
bullying those who pose a threat, thus inciting an inferior feeling. A question that reoccurred while studying Nietzsche was "how do the people
who are forced in to his master/slave complex break free of their master's grips?" The answer to my question is also in Nietzsche's work, and is
titled Transvaluation of Values. Transvaluation of Values occurs when the slave class over throws or resists their masters, (a flip in power structure)
therefore those who are placed in the roll of slaves due to their values, and beliefs will continue to break free of their oppression, because of the
opportunity named Transvaluation of Values. Within my class room we defined The Master and Slave Morality System as classifying people in to two
categories: master, and slave. Other names for the

How Did Nietzsche's Life Influence His Philosophy
Friedrich Nietzsche was a famous philosopher form Germany. He was born in RГ¶cken–bei–LГјtzen, which is a kingdom in Prussia on October 15,
1844. Friedrich Nietzsche lived a short live and died at age fifty–five. He died in Weimar on August 25, 1900. During Friedrich Nietzsche's life he
published many books, reflect on his religion, and obtained an education. Friedrich Nietzsche had to face many problems during his life. The problems
he faced created his history and influenced his philosophy (The Famous People 2017). Family Members Friedrich Nietzsche was part of large family.
His father's name was Carl Ludwig Nietzsche. Carl Nietzsche was a religious man and was the preacher of a Lutheran church. His mother's name was
Franziska Oehler. Friedrich Nietzsche also had a sister and a brother. His sister's name was Elisabeth FГ¶rster–Nietzsche, and his brother's name was
Ludwig Joseph. At age five, Friedrich Nietzsche's family life changed. His father passed away due to brain problem. The year after his father's death,
Ludwig Joseph the brother passed away. After the loss of his two family members, Friedrich Nietzsche, his mother, and sister moved in with their
grandmother. The loss of his love ones was a very trying time for Friedrich Nietzsche, and their deaths caused Nietzsche to question his beliefs ... Show
Some philosophers agreed with his claims and others tried to discredit or oppose his work. A philosopher who applied Friedrich Nietzsche's work
to his own was Theodore Herzl. He was born on May 2, 1860 and studied at the University of Vienna. Theodore Herzl developed the Zionist
Philosophy. This philosophy included Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas about war, honor, and state craft. The philosophy was created to explain what the
future of a Jewish state would hold. Both Friedrich Nietzsche and Theodore Herzl did not believe in a higher power or God (Influence and reception,

Analysis Of Friedrich NietzscheВґs Is Google Making USupid
Technology is constantly evolving it comes with pros and cons. Some may feel that the advancement in technology is doing more harm to the way we
think than bringing us a positive outcome to the way a human brain works. For me technology has allowed has proven to bring more positive than
negative. Technology has allowed human kind to accomplish the impossible, and resources such as google has opened minds to view, and think
differently. By having resources such as magazines, newspapers, journals, and books online for us to read without any hassle.
As stated in paragraph 3 in 'Is Google making us Stupid?" The web for a writer is Godsend. Meaning with the advancement of technology now
research that took some writers hours even days, spending most ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In googles opinion the more information that can be accessed, and the pace in which it is accessed the more productive research can become. Sergey
Brin and Larry Page the founders of google are working towards artificial intelligence. Meaning having a brain that is smarter than the ones
individuals currently posses with this idea put in place we can solve problems in the world that were once not solvable. For instance, artificial
intelligence is now used in self driving cars, pace makers, and in the power grid; this gives the resources of more precision and accuracy. Artificial
Intelligence can help us with space exploration, robots designed can help with exploring unknown areas to deem whether the area is a hostile
environment. There are many more examples from cellphones to a GPS, and map applications, fraud detection. The advancement in technology with
the help of google has made our day to day lives much

Nietzsche's Influence On American Philosophy
An indisputable influential figure within modern thought is German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, a polarizing thinker whose text Thus Spoke
Zarathustra has garnered abundant acclaim for its encapsulation of a shift within late nineteenth–century Western thought. Nietzsche's personal history
significantly affected the development of his philosophy as exemplified through the rhetoric, literary style and speeches found within Thus Spoke
Zarathustra. This report will follow the origins of Friedrich Nietzsche, the contextualization of his philosophical stances within his famed text, and the
profound influence of his literature in relation to late nineteenth–century thought and beyond.
BACKGROUND
In 1844, Friedrich Nietzsche was born in a small ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As we approach Nietzsche's philosophy within the text, we must first begin by adopting the principle of the will to power as the fundamental drive
of all things. The principle of the will to power states that everything must obey something, and if one cannot obey oneself, one must obey someone
else. Those who can transcend and command themselves then, according to Nietzsche, are the sole carriers of true freedom. The will to power for
Nietzsche is not simply the desire for power or even something that one could choose to have or not, but is rather a characteristic of everything that
lives. Such is observable through the human history of interaction but the will to power must not only be applied to human beings since ideas like
religion, morality, and truth are also prevailing concepts that are all positioned in the alike struggle that dictates life. The question is not whether one
should have the will to power or not, but rather what quality of will to power shall manifest. A negation of absolutes, then, is an observable theme
throughout Thus Spoke Zarathustra, as Nietzsche depicts our world and all within it as characterized by the constant struggling and overcoming of
prearranged influences. As we come to adopt this notion of our world and being in a perpetual flux, we interpret Nietzsche's

Friedrich Nietzsche's The Antichrist
Despite the title, Friedrich Nietzsche's book The Antichrist is anything but contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ as best understood in the Synoptic
Gospels. In fact, Nietzsche's project in this work, if I do dare to interpret Nietzsche, is to reveal the complete silliness of ambiguous, vague, absolutely
non–empirical concepts; specifically, concepts that create "values". In fact, Nietzsche's purpose in writing this book is to reveal those who have abused
the transcendental in order to manipulate and control those that are unable to understand, or wish not to understand, the improbability of such kinds of
divine revelation. In short, ever since the life if the man known as Jesus Christ, so called "christians" have manipulated his teachings... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nietzsche claims that the Christian religion has, for a very long time, been used as a means to confuse and dismiss reality. Instead, priests have been
suggesting vague concepts such as "judgement", "salvation", "faith", "sin", etc. in order to freely command whatever values they see fit. The
priests, in Nietzsche's view, have been using the transcendental and unfalsifiable realm of the religious in order to create selfishly motivated lies
for the gain of power. The poor masses have been following this bunch of lies because that they are deceived in thinking that they will themselves
gain more power by the way of God offering equality and eternal life. However, in all actuality, the world is not equal and these masses are being
made to suffer an even greater deal than necessary for the sake of a filthy religious lie. Nietzsche suggests that we, instead, abandon these lies and
leave the "will of God" in the past for a more happy future. Instead, Nietzsche offers, we can come to terms with reality and authentically seek to
fulfill our deepest desires; i.e. the natural values attributed to our psyche by the way of the process of

Charles Schaeffer And Friedrich Nietzsche Essay
Introduction Born nearly 70 years apart from each other, Francis Schaeffer and Friedrich Nietzsche were two very important figures in creating the
modern philosophy. Two different men that studied two different parts of philosophy. Because of their differences, most are unable to recognize their
many similarities.Each of the men had the things they studied, but the basis of their theories were almost identical.
Nietzsche
One of the commendable influential philosophers in the history of ideas and a gifted stylist in his native German, Friedrich Nietzsche undertook a
radical re–evaluation of established ideas and critiqued moral values during his career. One of Nietzsche's primary studies was on the problem of
morality. However, he seems to contradict himself on the matter of values. Tansesi claims it is because of the different definitions ofvalue – "values in a
descriptive sense as that which is thought to be of value by an individual or by the members of a group, and values in a normative sense as that
which is objectively of value" (652). Because of Nietzsche's committed denial of any moral values, it would seem impossible to attribute him to him a
commitment to the existence of any values in the normative sense (652). In Thus Spake Zarathustra, he claims that to value is to create, and that it is
only through valuing that there is value. In the same section it is also claimed that men did not discover values, nor were they given by a god; rather,
human beings

Friedrich Nietzsche, The German Philosopher
Tia Holenstein Professor Tevanyan RS 100 20 October 2015 Nietzsche and Agnosticism I chose to conduct my research on Friedrich Nietzsche, the
German philosopher. One of the main reasons I decided on him, is because of my personal beliefs. I am agnostic and Nietzsche's philosophy has an
atheistic view on religion, which I resonate with. Nietzsche was born in a small village in Germany on October 15th 1844. He often spoke of an idea
called "life–affirmation", which basically means questioning everything honestly. He is one of the most famous philosophers and he had an
interesting look at philosophy. He believed philosophy was not "a critique of words by means of other words" (untimely meditations) but it is a
practical way to help your self grow, overcome and become a greater person. By doing this one would be able to affirm life no matter what tragedies
you are faced with, "There are heights of the soul from which even tragedy ceases to look tragic" (Beyond Good and Evil). He considered himself to
be a teacher to these great individuals or the higher man – his target audience. Inside the higher man there are different instincts/drives that are forever
battling making them a chaotic being. This results in suffering and possible self– destruction. To reach life–affirmation one must take hold of this chaos
inside of them. Because that isn't an easy thing to do, a person might give in to a "Herd Instinct". The Herd instinct exists in everyone and is easy to
fall into. It is

Nietzsche's Influence On Religion
Friedrich Nietzsche on Religion
Friedrich Nietzsche was born in Germany and was originally a very religious person. But while he was studying Theology the study of religion from
University of Bonn, he became a loyal atheist after reading Arthur Schopenhauer's Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Nietzsche is the most. There can
be little doubt that Nietzsche is the most influential figure in modern atheism.
Friedrich Nietzsche was one of the most interesting, litigious and probably one of the clearest thinkers in western history. His philosophy still fascinates
enthusiasts and the curious till date. He is considered one of the fathers of a still–popular philosophical movement called existentialism. He was of the
view that people are free and they can control their destiny on their own. They are capable of having a good life if they want. Since the beginning of
the 20th century, the philosophy of religion by Nietzsche has had great brilliant influence around the world. He was the creator of the famous quote
"God is dead... We have killed him." ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to him people follow religion as a shield to protect themselves from their fears of their death and triviality. In doing so they justify that
they are very weak. Nietzsche believed that sooner or later a better kind of human race shall emerge whom he called the "Ubermensch" in German
meaning a superior human. He claimed that as man was evolved from apes, this Ubermensch will emerge from this weak man as a superior human
who will be without fear. So Nietzsche was sure that one day the Ubermensch will be able to do whatever they wished and the weaker folk, will
simply have to adjust with it. According to Nietzsche there is no such thing as the truth, lawfulness or parity. There is only individuality, power and

Nietzsche Influence
Srivaishnav Gandhe Dr.Bird English 453.6 30 Nov. 2017 Thesis Nietzsche and his Influence on the Modern Western World "Nietzsche is an atheist, a
life–affirming nihilist, an extreme pessimist, a trickster, a gleefully defiant irreverent rebel and a sick hero", my father said when I asked, "What
does Nietzsche mean to you." My father was one of the many people who hated Nietzsche. And maybe he is right in his own perspective because,
"What do we do when someone questions our existence?." "What do we do when someone says God is dead?." "What do we do when someone
comes and shakes the foundations of our beliefs?." But most of all the question is "what do we do when someone questions everything we believe
in?." I wouldn't say Nietzsche is telling the truth, because even he doesn't believe in the concept of truth. To put it in his words "To tell the truth is
to lie according to a fixed convention." So, to me Nietzsche is a not a man who tells you whether your beliefs are true or false, but challenges you
whether your belief about your beliefs are soundly premised. He upends your universe, so that you can reharmonize it over, on your own terms.
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was born on October 15,1844, the son of Karl Ludwig and Franziska Nietzsche. When young Friedrich was about five
years old he lost his father. Then soon after that he lost his brother. These events left young Friedrich the only male in the family that included his
mother, sister, paternal grandmother and an aunt. Upon the loss of Karl Ludwig, the family moved to Naumburg, Saxony. Friedrich gained admittance
to the prestigious Schulpforta, where he received Prussia's finest education in Humanities, Theology, and Classical Languages. In addition, Nietzsche
played piano and composed music. In 1864, Nietzsche entered the University of Bonn, spending the better part of that first year unproductively,
joining a fraternity and socializing with old and new acquaintances. By this time he had also given up Theology, dashing his mother's hopes of a
career in the ministry for him. Instead he choose the study of classical languages and a career in Philology. In 1865, he followed his major professor,
Friedrich Ritschl, from Bonn to the University of Leipzig and

Wilfred Nietzsche's Influence On Religion
Morgan Wakefield
Mr. Hardy
A4; Apologetics
October 7, 2014
Friedrich Nietzsche
Should society trust a man who claimed to be Jesus, Alexander the Great among other deities and historical figures? Despite suffering from madness
when claiming these identities, Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche's works inspire many historical leaders and present day scholars including Stalin, Hitler,
and Mussolini. A 19th century German philosopher, he followed the beliefs of atheism, moral skepticism, and relativism. Throughout his books he
mocked Christianity while promoting his own beliefs of morality, man reaching its potential, and society's killing of God (Mastin).
On October 15, 1844, Nietzsche came into the world within the town of RГ¶cken bei LГјtzen, modern–day ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"...The secret for harvesting from existence the greatest fruitfulness and greatest enjoyment is – to live dangerously" (The Gay Science 161). According
to Nietzsche, to achieve anything meaningful, hardships and effort were needed. He claimed that one must accept troubles instead of doing what
he perceived Christianity taught, to refuse and escape troubles (Mastin). "...Every specific body strives to become master over all space and to extend
its force" (The Will to Power 340). Nietzsche believed in the "will to power," or one's pursuit to expand his or her power. He saw it as the basis drive in
human behavior and as a positive device. Within his philosophy, Nietzsche believed one could become an "Гњbermensch," or a superhuman. For one
to become this superhuman, one must adhere to Nietzsche's own values. An Гњbermensch would be beyond pleasure and suffering, have total freedom,
and have no need for God. This creation of Nietzsche reflected what he personally wished for (Mastin). Along with his other unusual views on the
world, Nietzsche also wrote about his view on

Friedrich Nietzsche Research Paper
Friedrich Nietzsche once said "There are horrible people who, instead of solving a problem, tangle it up and make it harder to solve for anyone who
wants to deal with it. Whoever does not know how to hit the nail on the head should be asked not to hit it at all." This quote made me think more
about his study of existentialist.The meaning of existentialism a philosophical theory or approach that emphasizes the existence of the individual
person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of the will.To me existentialist is a deeper means of
life,meaning it break down life into many details and also look at life and a different view and from a different Perspective.
Looking into Friedrich Nietzsche life I learned Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher and cultural critic who published intensively in the 1870s
and 1880s. He is famous for uncompromising criticisms of traditional European morality and religion, as well as of conventional philosophical ideas
and social ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nietzsche was so inspired by Wagner that he made a decision to make his first book a tribute to Wagner's music. During Late 1871 The German Empire
is formed on January 18. During the same time The Birth of Tragedy out of the Spirit of Music was published in 1872.With the publication of The Birth
of Tragedy, Nietzsche returned to Basle to lecture.Nietzsche became a subject of ridicule in academic circles.But the nobility and nationalists loved
it.Late 1876 The Bayreuth theatre opens. Nietzsche and Wagner had convinced the German Reich to fund the theatre's construction. This moment
marks a break with Wagner.The concerts are a disappointment for Nietzsche and the Reich.This which withdraws financial

Nietzsche And Buddhism
Both, Friedrich Nietzsche and the Buddha, at least at the level of conventional truth, look at the life and the world as largely nihilistic and unsatisfying,
and search for a solution to the meaninglessness of their respective cultural situations by turning within and advocating a transformation of our inner
forces and of our outlook on the world. The major difference between Nietzsche and Buddhism, however, lies in the role of the will in nihilism and its
overcoming. For the Buddha, only by cutting the root of the fundamental will altogether, through the self–overcoming of the will to power, one can
step beyond nihilism. The radicality of both Nietzsche's negation and his affirmation of life, on the contrary, is limited insofar as the "standpoint

Friedrich Nietzsche And William James
Friedrich Nietzsche and William James were philosophers who examined the search for truth and its application in modern society. While both scholars
were contemporaries and concentrated on the function of truth, Nietzsche's philosophy advocated a scientific approach which renounced all religious
frameworks, while James' theory enabled one to find truth even in the metaphysical.
In "The Portable Nietzsche," Nietzsche investigates the meaning of truth in the apparent world and its relationship to the proposed existence of God.
More specifically, the philosopher attempts to explain how our world is misguided by the moral framework propagated by Christianity. Thisreligion
promises a God created "true world," but only for those who are the most pious and repentant. However, even as this promise becomes more distant
and obscure, the quest for everlasting life still creates a pervasive set of morals that taint one's views of truth in the apparent world. Hence, the only
way to overcome this obstacle and attain truth in this (apparent) world, is by divesting from the beliefs and moral framework created by Christianity.
Nietzsche's argument begins by questioning what is the meaning of truth? Is it an absolute, or as Nietzsche believes, the result of "arbitrary
abstraction," that derives its meaning from the individual's experiences, language and perspectives? (45) Hence, truths are basically "illusions,"
influenced by a prescribed set of virtues preached by Christianity and

The World 's Deepest Thinkers
Friedrich Nietzsche is considered one of the Western world's deepest thinkers because he calls so many things into question. He felt that everyone
would benefit greatly by questioning everything. In 1887 he wrote On the Genealogy of Morality to expand on his ideas he expressed through
Beyond Good and Evil. On the Genealogy of Morality consists of three different essays that question and critique the value of our moral judgements.
The first and the one I will focus on, being 'Good and Evil', 'Good and Bad,' in which Nietzsche discusses how goodness is relative to the eye of the
beholder. He specifies two different types of groups, the first group being the militaristic and political group, which he has deemed the "masters."
The "masters" view "good" as having the characteristics of strength, power, freedom and achievement. The second group being the "slaves," which is
the group that is controlled by the masters. The slaves viewing "good" as having the characteristics of sympathy, charity, forgiveness, and humility.
The characteristics that the "masters" deemed "good," like strength and power, were used as sources for fear against the "slaves" and thus were
deemed evil. He feels that the "slaves" deem the things the "masters" view as good as evil because of the resentment they have. It is men of a noble
rank that Nietzsche determines has the "master morality." These are powerful, healthy and courageous men that are essentially barbaric to those they
claim to be beneath them.

Nietzsche's Accomplishments
From the ages of 14 to 19 (1858–1864), Nietzsche attended a first–rate boarding school, Schulpforta, located about 4km from his home in Naumburg,
where he prepared for university studies. The school's rigid educational atmosphere was reflected in its long history as a former Cistercian monastery
(1137–1540), with buildings that included a 12th century Romanesque chapel and a 13th century Gothic church. At Schulpforta – a school whose
alumnae included the German Idealist philosopher, Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814) – Nietzsche met his lifelong acquaintance, Paul Deussen
(1845–1919), who was confirmed at Nietzsche's side in 1861, and who was to become an Orientalist, historian of philosophy, and in 1911, the founder
of the Schopenhauer Society. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Leipzig, he developed a close friendship with Erwin Rohde (1845–1898), a fellow philology student and future philologist, with whom he would
correspond extensively in later years. Momentous for Nietzsche in 1865 was his accidental discovery of Arthur Schopenhauer's The World as Will and
Representation (1818) in a local bookstore. He was then 21. Schopenhauer's atheistic and turbulent vision of the world, in conjunction with his highest
praise of music as an art form, captured Nietzsche's imagination, and the extent to which the "cadaverous perfume" of Schopenhauer's world–view
continued to permeate Nietzsche's mature thought remains a matter of scholarly debate. After discovering Schopenhauer, Nietzsche read F.A. Lange's
newly–published History of Materialism and Critique of its Present Significance (1866) – a work that criticizes materialist theories from the standpoint
of Kant's critique of metaphysics, and that attracted Nietzsche's interest in its view that metaphysical speculation is an expression of poetic

Existentialism: Kierkegaard and Nietzsche Essay
The Merriam – Webster Dictionary defines existentialism as a chiefly 20th century philosophical movement embracing diverse doctrines but
centering on analysis of individual existence in an unfathomable universe and the plight of the individual who must assume ultimate responsibility
for acts of free will without any certain knowledge of what is right or wrong or good or bad (Merriam, 2011). In other words, an existentialist
believes that our natures are the natures we make for ourselves, the meaning of our existence is that we just exist and there may or may not be a
meaning for the existence, and we have to individually decide what is right or wrong and good or bad for ourselves. No one can answer any of those
things for us. A good... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Kierkegaard made this statement he was saying people had to take a blind leap of faith by believing in their own thoughts and convictions
and make decisions that God would approve of. He also believed this was the only way to become an "authentic human being" (Teachme, 1997).
Another of facet of his position was his belief that we as humans just exist and their may or may not be a meaning for that existence. To me this
was his way of answering the great life questions that we all struggle with such as, why am I hear and what is my meaning in life. He is telling us
we may never know, but the best way to find out is to develop our own nature and purpose in life. Make good decisions (to stay in God's good
graces), base those decisions on what we, as individuals feel is right or wrong, utilize our freedom (individuality) and have convictions in life.
Another philosopher who also a pioneer of existentialism was Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche's faith, like Kierkegaard's, was at one time rooted in
Christianity. However, Kierkegaard remained embedded in his faith and Nietzsche abandoned his. Nietzsche's existentialism had many of the same
beliefs as Kierkegaard's such as – both believed that philosophy should be based on the value of people's beliefs and that people had to find their own
way in life and decide for themselves what the meanings of life and existence are (Cline, 2011). Nietzsche was concerned

Nietzsche's Argument Analysis: God Is Dead
In 1882 a German philosopher named Friedrich Nietzsche made the statement that, "God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him." By
saying this he meant that moral principles should not be based off of god. Based off of the many evils imposed by the human race is it not so
farfetched that someone could agree with Nietzsche's cage rattling statement? Many people began to wonder if there was a God then how could there
be so many manmade atrocities created that harm and go against everything our religion has taught us? Nietzsche's bold statement can still be used to
describe what our world is like today. It wouldn't be unusual for someone to say that our generation has continued the negative trend of ungodly actions.
Friedrich ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Now that these things do exist, I feel as if the negative things we do are magnified and can be spread very quickly through our advancements in
communication. Now that we have a plethora of ways to communicate with each other rapidly, its very easy to spread all things both positive and
negative. Sometimes we are so wrapped up in it that we forget to do the important things like take f our relationship with god so that we can have a
greater opportunity to be connected to real life and becoming better people. However I do feel that it is a blessing that Friedrich Nietzsche had the
courage to say these words as a challenge to our people. The most impactful things in life are those that make us think and make us view things
differently and that is exactly what Nietzsche accomplished. Although there are natural disasters, diseases, accidents, and other unfortunate things that
happen I do not think its fair to say that God is the one to blame for these things that happen in nature. However I do agree with Nietzsche's statement
in the way that it opens peoples eyes to even think about the way we can acknowledge what we've done and then make an effort to make changes to
always make sure that the statement "God is dead" is never

The Relationship Of Rainer Wilhelm Rilke And Friedrich...
We could hardly argue that there has ever been a more controversial and revolutionary philosopher than Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche. His ideas, which
were more often than not found to attack the established pillars of traditional philosophy, have been a massive influence to dozens of philosophers,
writers, artists, intellectuals and even scientists, such as the father of modern psychology, Sigmund Freud. And although he has influenced generations
after him, inspired thinkers such as Heidegger, Camus, Sartre, Foucault and so on, we must not forget about his influence on his contemporaries, such
as the Bohemian – Austrian poet Rainer Maria Rilke.
The two men, Rainer Maria Rilke and Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, the poet philosopher and the philosopher poet were contemporaries. Friedrich
Nietzsche was born was born in 1844 and died in 1900, Rilke was born 1875 and died in 1926. Apart from being just contemporaries Nietzsche and
Rilke had another common point in their lives. The same woman Nietzsche fell in love with and was rejected by was, and later wrote a book on him,
was the mistress of Rainer Maria Rilke. The relationship of either men with Lou Salome is not important in this essay, however it almost symbolically
depicts how close their lives were intertwined. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this essay I will try to prove that the philosophy of Nietzsche is clearly reflected in the works of Rainer Maria

The Philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche Essay
Philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche Friedrich Nietzsche was a 19th–century German philosopher and held in regard amongst the greatest philosophers
of the early part century. He sharpened his philosophical skills through reading the works of the earlier philosophers of the 18th century such as
Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Arthur Schopenhauer and African Spir; however, their works and beliefs were opposite to his own. His primary
mentor was Author Schopenhauer, whose belief was that reality was built on the foundation of experience. Such as it is, one of his essays,
Schopenhauer als Erzieher, published in 1874, was dedicated to Schopenhauer (Mencken, 2008). In the past two centuries, his work has had authority
and influence in both... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The fact that he gave up and refused to fight back gives room for more findings. He disagrees with the Christian community for making Jesus a
martyr and sees that in so doing, they had made the Christ teachings vague. Nietzsche wrote his works in the process of rebuilding the damage caused
by Christians during the ancient days. His inclination was to show the true way in which God wanted human beings to live as opposed to what
Christians were doing. Another philosophy of Nietzsche was related to the notion of ressentiment. Defined, ressentiment is any cautious, defeatist, or
cynical attitude based on the belief that the individual and human institutions exist in a hostile or indifferent universe or society and an oppressive
awareness of the futility of trying to improve one's status in life or in society (dictionary.com). In the work, On the Genealogy of Morals, ressentiment
is illustrated in the way the Jewish clerics act in response to the authority of the Romans. Nietzsche states, "the Jews, that priestly people, who in
opposing their enemies and conquerors were ultimately satisfied with nothing less than a radical revaluation of their enemies' values, that is to say, an
act of the most spiritual revenge. For this alone was appropriate to a priestly people, the people embodying the most deeply repressed priestly
vengefulness." The feeling of ressentiment is subconscious and communicates Nietzsche's analysis of

Nietszche's Philosophy : Friedrich Nietzsche And...
Philosophy consists of many diverse schools of thought, one of which is Existentialism. Existentialism is based upon the analysis of human existence,
our purpose in life, and how we find ourselves existing in the world. In other words, existentialism is a form of philosophy which is focused on finding
the self and our meaning of life through our ability to have free will in our choices. Existentialists believe that humans have free will and that humans
determine their fate through their own choices in life; however, existentialists do not believe that humans are innately good but ruined by external
forces or that people have no fault in their affairs. (Allaboutphilosophy.org). There have been many existentialist philosophers throughout history, those
of which include Soren Kierkegaard, Jean–Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, but most importantly,Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche was a highly influential
German philosopher who developed his central points of his own philosophy which was centered around the idea that people should explore what it
means to be human and not let society establish what is morally correct. Nietzche is an nineteenth century existentialist philosopher who believed that
man was responsible for his own actions; he foresaw the dissolution of traditional religion and metaphysics (Wilkerson). Nietzsche suggests that by
defeating societal norms and embracing every aspect of life, humans can achieve their full potential. The idea presented by Nietzsche in Beyond
Good and Evil did not mean he did not go throughout his life without a "moral compass". He strongly believed that humanity had a potential that
was not being reached, he believed it could be reached if the social norms and standards of society were not acknowledged. In other words, he
believed that values which are predetermined by society hold humanity back from their abilities to reach their highest potential, an example of this is
religion. In Nietzsche's time, religion was a highly prominent idea and custom in society, most people believed in God, it almost seemed like a crime
if one did not believe in God. As Nietzsche developed his philosophy, he began to view this as something holding man–kind back. Since birth, children
are taught

How Does Meursault Follow A Virtue Of Religion?
If someone does not follow a deity, believe in a spirit, or even fear the afterlife, is he absent of morals? The writer Albert Camus wrote the novel
called The Stranger as example of a character living his life believing only the rules and comforts of the physical world. The main character,
Meursault, denies god's existence and frankly has no care for the matters of religion. The philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche, states that society has been
moving away towards the idea we need a god to live a contemporary life. Friedrich Nietzsche goes into more detail centralizing his points about
freedom and individualism are significant leaders in this "new mindset" in his works of The Genealogy of Morals (1887) and Beyond Good and Evil
(published in 1886). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Meursault complains how the weather is hot, and find the Arabs at a spring. He runs into the Raymond ex–mistress's brother who flashes his knife out
to threaten Meursault. Meursault fires few shots. ("SparkNote on The Stranger")
Meursault is then put in jail for murdering an "Arab". Meursault's investigators have looked into his private life and claimed he was insensitive at his
Madame Meursault's Funeral. Meursault's lawyer asked Meursault him why he was not sad about his mother's burial. Meursault said he probably did
love his mother: "that didn't mean anything". However, he can't analyze himself. Meursault's own defense lawyer is offended by his response and
after the lawyer departs and Meursault says to himself: "I felt the urge to reassure [the lawyer] that I was just like everybody else." ("SparkNote on
The Stranger")
In Chapter 6 of part 2, Marie visits Meursault once and she tries to smile to comfort him. She also tells him as soon as he gets out of jail they can get
married. After their brief meeting, Meursault pondered about the things he once had and now barred from them (cigarettes and Marie). Although, he
escapes his boredom by remembering the things in his apartment and a they comment on newspaper

Nietzsche: Human, All Too Human
Nietzsche has had one of the greatest and most profound impacts on philosophy and modern thought. Nietzsche was one of the first existentialism
thinkers who coined the phrase "God is dead." In other words, Nietzsche realized that all human beings wrestled with certain difficulties and
existentialist in life that is all apart of being human. Many of Nietzsche's work was determining and distinguishing the desire to know the struggles of
life anywhere from ideas, religion, species, science, thought, and many more. Nietzsche also believed that once something died that something else
comes into its existence and replaces the old with the new. This idea is profound and heavily influenced with how things work in nature and how life
continually evolves and advances into an existential reality simply driving life in its most natural way that we must come into a correspondence with
in order to embrace. Throughout Nietzsche's life and work there are three main topics that should be taken into a deeper depth of light and discussed
which consist of Nietzsche's ideas of morality, religion, and a more in depth look into his most famous phrase "God is dead."
To begin with, Nietzsche had a very strong belief in two moralities that consist of the master morality and the slave morality. The master morality is a
life affirming that manifest the power, a realization of one being noble, and a superior status. According to Nietzsche, masters are considered to be
unrestrained, audacious, open, and

Discourse on Religion: Nietzsche and Edwards Essay
Friedrich Nietzsche certainly serves as a model for the single best critic of religion. At the other end of this spectrum, Jonathan Edwards emerges as his
archrival in terms of religious discourse. Nietzsche argues that Christianity's stance toward all that is sensual is that grounded in hostility, out to tame
all that rests on nature, or is natural, akin to Nietzsche's position in the world and his views. Taking this into account, Edwards's views on Christianity
should be observed in context targeted at those who agree with his idea, that G–d is great and beyond the capacity of human reason.
Edwards reaffirms for his audience G–d's Spiritual and Divine Light. This light imparted to the soul by G–d, is of a different nature from any ... Show
2). Nietzsche calls out Christianity as that which supports human weakness, affirming by way of pity a human's frailty and sickness, "active sympathy
for the ill–constituted as weak" (Nietzsche, Sec. 2).
In response to Nietzsche's rhetoric, Edwards would say that sinful men cannot see divine excellence. Further, he would categorize Nietzsche's ideas of
good and bad, that which is "merely speculative and notional: as when a person only speculatively judges that any thing is, which, by the agreement of
mankind, is called good or excellent," used to that person's advantage and liking, or personal opinion (Edwards, 216).
Edwards and Nietzsche agree in many respects that may appear concealed through radicalism underlain both texts. I believe that Nietzsche sees value in
Christianity, apart from whether or not he adjudges the religion as fabricated, to the extent that the individual's spiritual connection with his
subconscious offers redemptive qualities for that person. Nietzsche and Edwards agree in the sense that G–d, if there exists such a thing, is found in
the "sense of the heart" (Edwards, 216). Again, Nietzsche calls upon the 'Kingdom of Heaven' as a condition for the heart" (Nietzsche, 34). Both agree
with the idea that G–d can only be sensed through an individual's heart.
Further, Edward's dispels Christian's uniformity, or conformity, so despised in Nietzsche's views on Modern Christianity, it is very much an individual

God Is Dead, By Friedrich Nietzsche
"God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him." (Gay Science, 126) This harsh statement remains among Friedrich Nietzsche's most
powerful and disturbing quotes, spoken by a proclaimed Madman to a crowd of disbelievers. After making this claim, the Madman becomes horrified
by his audience's ignorance, noting that "This tremendous event is still on its way." This has an effect of suspending the Madman's message in time,
expanding its audience infinitely, for the event of God's death could still be on its way. Therefore, nearly 150 years after these words were written, we
must ask ourselves, does God remain dead, and has our modern society killed him? This is a haunting and disturbing question, but in many ways our
society does resemble Nietzsche's masses. However, it also resembles the Madman himself, due to its inherent individualism.
To investigate these similarities, we must first define what Nietzsche means by "God." If our modern society is seen as an immoral world, and God
as morality, then again yes, we have effectually killed God. However, it may be a mistake to think God and Morality entirely synonymous. In Beyond
Good and Evil, Nietzsche states, "Morality is the herd–instinct of the individual," () implying that, since morality preserves the abhorrent mass rather
than the sainted individual, it is weakness, a reaction rather than a choice. But in the Madman's tale, God is not described as a reaction, but as a victim.
The mass is shamed by the individual

Nietzsche Research Paper
Short Paper 4 Friedrich Nietzsche
Son of a preacher, Friedrich Nietzsche was a deeply spiritual atheist who lived a cold life of continual struggle. Nietzsche is known as the
anti–philosopher because he provoked controversy. He had an enormous influence on twentieth century contemporary thought. He made a name for
himself as someone who is not scared to speak his mind, He introduced concepts such as The Will to Power, Overman, Master Morality and Slave
Morality. Which are thought provoking important concepts to know.
Friedrich Nietzsche`s hard life and philosophy led him to concluded that life itself is an irrational, and pointless existence. Nietzsche insisted that life
is governed by the "Will to Power", which he defined as a universal desire ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nietzsche is saying that there are only 3 types of people and that they are clearly defined. I think that's too raw; it's like saying that either you love
America, or you hate it, a false dichotomy. In reality it`s possible to hate one specific part, for example the fact that America does not use the
metric system but still love it as a whole. I also think that there are far more "last mans" in this world than "overmen". A good example of a last man
is not hard to conceive. For example, a powerful billionaire that's concerned with power and lives for comfort and pleasure. Although he can easily
improve the world, he chooses to use technological advancements only when it's in his benefit. He will strive to neglect technology of knowledge that
improves the lives of the world but negatively effects their wealth. An overman is harder to come by, but maybe someday we will find

Nietzsche's Letter From Birmingham Jail
This paper is a comparative study between Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil and Martin Luther King Jr's Letter from Birmingham Jail. Detailing
their views regarding ethical and unethical law. Martin Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia in 1929 and died in 1968. He attended college
at Morehouse college and soon wanted to become a Baptist minister like his father. Shortly after graduating from college in 1948 he attended a
seminary at Chester, Pennsylvania and then received his bachelor of divinity degree in 1955. While King worked on his doctoral degree he became a
Baptist minister and became very involved in the segregation laws and working for civil rights movements. King wrote letter to Birmingham jail while
confined in Birmingham jail for leading a demonstration protesting segregation. King believed that everyone should be created equal and that our laws
should reflect our equal rights. Friedrich Nietzsche was born in 1844 and died in 1900. He was born in Rocken, Prussia, attended Lutheran boarding
school in Pforta and graduated in 1864. He enrolled in the university of Bonn to study theology and soon after changing his views on religion and
becoming an atheist, he transferred to the University Leipzig to study classical philology. He was known for his many important works in philology
and became a professor at Basel in 1869. Nietzsche saw society as will to power, he believed there are the weak and the strong in our society and that
the masters are the

Friedrich Nietzsche 's Philosophy And Ethics
The Antichrist
Samuel Edwards
Central Christian College
May 6, 2016 Abstract: Friedrich Nietzsche devoted his life to the study of philosophy and ethics. In particular to topics regarding Christianity and
Atheism. A majority of his writings are against Christianity and The Antichrist is no different. The following paper will look into what Nietzsche wrote
in The Antichrist and explore the ethical principles that he proposes and dismisses in this writing. The Antichrist is a collection ofFriedrich Nietzsche
writings that were put together by his niece shortly after his death. She wrote an opening preface before his collection of writings that explain her
desire for publishing the writings and defending his standpoint. In her opening statements, which were approximately 20% of the entire book, she made
some claims about Nietzsche, his writings, and his beliefs. She states that Nietzsche "...intended to attack Christianity headlong and with all arms..." and
that "All his wrath... was reserved for "St. Paul and his like," who perverted the Beatitudes which Christ intended for the lowly only." Despite saying
this Nietzsche staid that he never set out to destroy Christianity all together, so that the lowly and unintelligent would still have an outlet. But to
destroy Christianity for the intellectuals and the scholars. Oddly enough he set out to "...make Paul the villain, and Jesus a bystander." ( After the
introduction by his niece a collection of 62 essays are arranged

##ethical Analysis Of 'God Is Dead' By Friedrich Nietzsche
I was really confused when I first stumbled across reading this quote. I didn't really understand what Nietzsche was saying from the phrase "God is
dead''. After talking with my classmates and doing some research I got a better understanding about the quote. Most people didn't understand it like
me at first and they thought Nietzsche interpreted in a literal death or end of God. I think Nietzsche says this quote because he was an atheist and he
had a different perspective about God which he never even believed in. Most people believe that God is all knowing and powerful so he or she can't
die. The understanding I got from this quote is that I think Nietzsche is trying to say that is not relevant to people anymore meaning that people don't
care. Friedrich Nietzsche is a well known philosopher who influenced many topics in the world and was not really a fan of religion.
This quote is widely known by everyone and it is first shown in his 1882 collection "The Gay Science''. The phrase "God is dead. God remains
dead. And we have killed him" can have many meanings to different people. I interpreted this phrase by thinking that people don't care about and no
more have a use for God. In a sense Nietzsche is saying that large and consistent moral theories could exist without reference to God. For example,
Europe no longer needed God as the source for all morality, value, or order in the universe. By that I mean philosophy and science was capable of
doing that for us. As the

Friedrich Nietzsche 's Influence On Modern Intellectual...
Friedman Wilhelm Nietzsche was a German philosopher, poet, cultural critic, philologist, and a Greek and Latin scholar. His work has had lots of
influence on modern intellectual history and Western philosophy in general. It revolved mainly around art, philology, religion and science. He wrote
about morality, tragedy, aesthetics, atheism, epistemology and consciousness. However, some of Nietzsche 's most profound elements of his
philosophy include his powerful critique of reason and truth. He argued for perspectivism. He critiqued religion and Christian ethics, developed the
concept of Ubermensch and the doctrine of eternal return to support it. Also, Friedman Nietzsche came up with his theory of master–slave morality and
response to the "death of God" and nihilism. The philosopher 's notion of the Apollonian and Dionysian were prominent as well. The paper discusses,
in detail, some of Nietzsche 's major philosophies such as master and slave morality. It looks further into his view on nihilism; his definition, why he
was so much against it and what he thinks should replace it. Also, the write–up explains Nietzsche 's analysis of Christianity as a dominant religion and
its teachings. Lastly, it points out the prejudices of philosophers and the relationship between philosophy and truth.Beyond good and evil is a detailed
account of Nietzsche's mature philosophy. Distinction between master and slave morality In his book, "Beyond good and evil," Nietzsche describes the

Gould And Nietzsche Question Religion And Nature In Suffering

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jessica Simms

More from Jessica Simms (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Gould And Nietzsche Question Religion And Nature In Suffering