Canadian Peacekeeping

Canadian Peacekeeping
"From the outset of the war, the Canadian people have clearly shown that it is their desire to help in every way to make Canada's war effort as
effective as possible" – William Lyon Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada during World War II (Collections Canada, 2001). Currently, many in
the 21st century consider Canada as a very peaceful, social, and overall accommodating country. Canada does many things for its people such as taking
in many refugees, helping university level students with loans, and giving immigrants affordable housing. Canada also helps protect other countries
military wise, especially the people in certain countries who are found in situations like war. Canada tries to create peace with these countries or tries
to use... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During this conflict, Canada helped defend South Korean forces from the Soviet backed North Korea. Canada did many things in this conflict, one of
the most important was that Canada helped secure Seoul, and in the process pushed back soviet forces towards the North Korean Border. As a
peacekeeping country apart of the U.N (United Nations) peacekeeping force, an estimated "26,791 Canadian military personnel served in the Korean
War, during both the combat phase and as peacekeepers afterward. The last Canadian soldiers left Korea in 1957" (Herd, 2007). Not only did Canada aid
South Korea in combat, but Canada also aided South Korea in the peacekeeping phase after the conflict. Canada completed their mission as both
countries agreed for an armistice, and to stop the fighting. According to author, D'Arcy Jenish, "Both sides abandoned any attempt to take
territory when North and South agreed in July, 1951, to start peace talks. But there was no ceasefire. Instead, as the negotiations dragged on for
two years, the war became a stalemate" (2000). Even after the conflict, some Canadians decided to stay back and serve in Korea, and many of
these troops "guarded and patrolled the ROK's (Republic of Korea) side of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), which continues to separate the two
Koreas" (Korean War, 2003). All Canadian armed forces personnel who served in Korea from 1950 to 1957 are considered Korean War veterans"
(Herd, 2007). It is clearly seen through the countless contributions and help Canada provided, that Canada was a peacekeeper during this
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Suez Canal Crisis : An Emerging Country Into Financing...
The Suez Canal crisis began when an outsider exploited an emerging country into financing a project in which a country has no mean of financial
recovery. The Suez Canal was geographically significant with an international interest to facilitate trade and commerce. It provided an economic boost
to the international community following the opening of the canal, with the exception of the Egypt economy. The canal builder, Ferdinand de Lesseps
coerced Mohamed Aly's son, Mohamed Sayeed of Egypt into financing the bulk of the Suez Cana project. Egypt economy took a downturn with a
bankruptcy following the opening of the Suez Canal, leaving Egypt to begin the fight to rebuild its country.
This crisis involved six different nations. Beginning with Egypt attempt to nationalize the Suez Canal, which leads to Israel, France, and England
efforts to overthrow Egypt president and in between are the two–superpower nation, the United States and the Soviet Union with its' nuclear
capabilities, and the diplomacy of the United Nations. This epic drama shows how Egypt 's' national strategic methodology destroyed the international
relationship and caused the world to the edge of global conflict.
Ends: Egypt political environment that set the stage for potential conflict
The outsider has exploited Egypt political regime due to its' poor economic states under the irresponsible and vain King Farouk (Cavendish, 2002)
ruling for much of the 1950s. Senior officer within the Egyptian Army blamed King

Suez Crisis Research Paper
Suez Crisis
Do you know of an event in Sinai Egypt, that took place in 1956 that killed 3507 soldiers and 1000 innocent civilians? This was an invasion of Egypt
by Israel, who was followed by the United Kingdom and France into Sinai at the Suez Canal. The Suez Crisis was a gruesome event that happened in
Egypt that took many lives because there were many important events that happened in the Suez Crisis, that had a big impact on Egypt and the four
other countries, and there also a big effect on the rest of the world.
There were many Important events that happened during the Suez Crisis. First, there were two invasions that occurred, The first one being the early
invasion in Southern Sinai. the invasion of the Sinai, began when an Israeli paratrooper ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It also involved cuba and lead to the Cuban Missile Crisis. The Cuban Missile Crisis was a 13 day confrontation between the United States and the
Soviet union concerning American ballistic missile deployment in Italy and Turkey with consequent Soviet ballistic missile deployment in Cuba. The
confrontation is often considered the closest the Cold War came to escalating into a full–scale nuclear war. Another thing it effected was the united
nations and it destroyed it. By handing it over to Dag HammarskjГ¶ld and his feckless ilk, Eisenhower turned the organization from the stout voice of
international law and order into at best a meaningless charade; at worst, a Machiavellian cesspool. Instead of teaching Nasser and his fellow dictators
that breaking international law does not pay, Suez taught them that every transgression will be forgotten and forgiven, especially if oil is at stake. Suez
destroyed the moral authority of the so–called world community.
The Suez Crisis. A very important event that took place in 1956 that took many lives. The Suez Crisis was important in many ways, from the war
plans and invasions in Sinai, to the aftermath and casualties in the crisis. The suez crisis was a Gruesome time in Egypt that took many lives and was
very important in their history and the rest of the world's history. This event is very important to many countries and should be important to you

The Suez Crisis and Sir Antony Eden
The Suez Crisis is often cited by some historians as one of the worst historical decisions that imprinted an indelible mark on the then British premier
Sir Antony Eden. More often than not the decision by Eden to invade Egypt following a disagreement about nationalization of the Suez Canal is often
cited as a the worst foreign policy decision that destroyed Eden political career and humiliated British empire in its wake. The decision by Eden to use
military force against Nasser is often viewed by many as arising from a personal grudge towards Nasser, while only a few defend the fact that Eden
had attempted to resolve the looming conflict peacefully.
A Brief Introduction about Sir Robert Antony Eden It is unfortunate that despite Sir Antony Eden having successfully served as Britain for three
decades as a foreign secretary and his subsequent rise to become the British prime minister in 1955 was overshadowed by the 1956 Suez Crisis that saw
him tender his resignation after serving approximately 18 months in office. While justifying this action, Eden cited that he was protecting British
commercial interests of which the recent nationalization of the Suez Canal by Nasser seemed to threaten. Eden strongly perceived Nasser as a dictator
and that his actions could easily be replicated with the actions of Hitler and Mussolini that subsequently ignited World War.
Born to a baronet in County Durham on 12 June 1987, Antony Eden was educated at Eton and oxford where he

The Suez Canal Crisis: Events Of The Cold War
The Suez Canal Crisis was one of many events of the Cold War. The Canal opened in 1869, after 10 years of construction by Ferdinand de Lesseps of
France, connecting the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea. The canal held a neutral position, allowing access to all countries. The British –who had the
strongest naval force in the world– controlled the traffic going through it. They ensured that the Canal was open to all countries. In 1914, the traffic
control changed to include the French military. Problems arose when Egypt nationalized the Canal and began to charge for the passage of ships in
order to pay for the Aswan Dam that they wanted to construct. Egypt had previously arranged to receive a loan from Britain and The United States in
order ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His bias affects the interpretation of an event. Whether it is personal impact from the event that changes the way he wrote, or opinions that are
formed when researching. Using a single source for history will result in taking in what is said as the final truth. When researching the Suez Canal
Crisis and the motives behind each party's actions, I gained bias towards Egypt. I personally feel that Britain was abusing the power they had. I
acknowledge the reasoning behind what Britain did, but my own personal opinions and morals led me to see Britain's actions as unjust. If I had read
only Britain's side, I would have seen it as opposite. In conclusion, the only way to gain a reliable source of knowledge is by analysis multiple sources
that show multiple perspectives and reaching your own view on an

The Suez Crisis
In the Suez Crisis, not all other ways of resolving the problem should have been tried first because it was a surprise attack on Egypt. The British did
not try other ways of solving the crisis and did not try diplomacy with Egypt. The British took "prompt action" against Nasser because they feared that
their power in the Middle East would be compromised because of him." (Dooley) They colluded with France and Israel so that they would all attack
Egypt and forcefully recover the Suez Canal. Prime Minister Eden did not consider many options besides war because he saw a parallel between
how "Hitler had begun by remilitarizing the Rhineland; Nasser had expropriated the Suez Canal." (Kunz 97) Consequently, he did not want to try to
appease Nasser because he feared that the Egyptians would influence the rest of the Middle East and cut off their oil supply. Although war should
have been a last resort the British's "immediate impulse was to hit Nasser hard and quickly" (Dooley). Clearly, diplomacy was not considered because
the British hoped to seize the Suez Canal by force. This is why they secretly colluded in hopes of bombarding the Egyptians and forcing them to
relinquish control of the canal. "Almost immediately, Britain with France started well–publicized military preparations in the Mediterranean" they
hoped to force Egypt to agree to give the Suez Canal to the international community. (Epstein) When Egypt refused British, France and Israel retaliated
against the Egyptians.

The Importance Of Canadian Peacekeeping
As the name suggests, peacekeepers are unbiased special forces whose job is to go in locations where there is a state of conflict and use their
negotiation skills to prevent the two sides from engaging in war. This is what the Canadian army has been doing since the Cold War to prevent small
conflicts to turn into World War III. This is also what they should keep doing to prevent some major wars. Yet, there are also people who prefer to
engage in war rather than peaceful means. Today, not everyone knows who they are, what they do, who created the Canadianpeacekeeping forces and
how today's peacekeeping forces remember their predecessors.
Initially, to understand why they are necessary it is important to understand who these forces are, what ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some of the Conservatives argue that while working on keeping the world safe Canada's defenses were getting weaker. Thus, they shut down most of
the operations of peacekeeping and the Pearson Centre. Dorn is against this idea as he wrote, "Special skills including negotiation, conflict
management and resolution, as well as an understanding of UN procedures and past peacekeeping missions, would have been valuable to troops left
to navigate their way through that complex and chaotic environment of Kandahar." (The end of peacekeeping). In this quote, he explains the
usefulness of the peacekeepers as their experience would have been valuable to the troops fighting in war zones. The Pearson Centre is a ground of
the incredible knowledge for future soldiers and shutting it down would mean to reject all the hard work the peacekeepers have been doing during their

Eisenhower's Containment Through "Action by Inaction"...
Taylor Dukes
American Presidency
Richard Skinner
March 15, 2012
Eisenhower's Containment Through 'Action by Inaction' During the Suez Canal Crisis
The 1950's demanded a certain kind of American President: one tranquil enough to reside over a post–WWII society, and yet bold enough to propel the
country through the Cold War. Though a description of "Ike" Dwight D. Eisenhower as a strong central leader heavily contradicts the construed image
of a "kindly grandfather figure, a bit inarticulate and above politics, a man who enjoyed golfing and trout fishing over the routine chores of running the
government' (Neff 37), it is certainly apt. Eisenhower demonstrated a bold daringness in his time as President; one that was masked by a ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Eisenhower's view that the way to prevent the spread of communism to the Middle East was by promoting stability in the region between both the
Western powers and the Arab powers went on to guide his policy towards the Middle East. Eisenhower's goals for US involvement in the Middle East
"reflected the president's own cold war ideology and included promoting regional stability, guaranteeing the free flow of Middle Eastern oil to Western
Europe, supporting Arab nationalism and Israeli independence, improving relationships with the Arab states, hastening the decline of European
empires, maintaining the solidarity of the Western alliance, and avoiding an arms race betweenIsrael and its Arab neighbors, with the United States and
Russia the principal arms suppliers" (Ambrose 328–329). The President's commitment to these goals of maintaining relationships and containing
communism accounts for many of the trends that would characterize Eisenhower's conduct in the Middle East. Among these trends were: Eisenhower's
reliance on frequent–but–informal consultations with a small number of appointees; his tendency to try and delay the inevitable for as long as
possible as to allow for planning; his hesitation towards nearly any action, whether it be to take action or to cease taking action; his encouragement for
vagueness and secrecy pertaining to the Crisis; and finally, his ability to firmly and effectively communicate his full executive power. Eisenhower's

What Happened during the Suez Crisis
4. In what ways can the Suez Crisis be seen as a conflict between nationalism and imperialism?
The Suez Crisis was an incident that first commenced on the 29th of October, 1956, in which Israeli military forces entered the Sinai Peninsular and
attacked Egyptian positions, driving them back. By the next day, Israeli forces had reached the Suez Canal, after taking a majority of the Sinai
Peninsular. (Best, Hanhimaki, Maiolo & Schulze, 2008, p.432). Britain and France then both issued an ultimatum, for both Israeli and Egyptian forces
to withdraw from the Suez Canal, citing its safety from the violence of war as extremely important. After Gamal Abder Nasser,Egypt's President at the
time, rejected the ultimatum, on the 30th ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These events, which focused on Egypt attempting to free itself from colonial influence, as well as giving rise to nationalistic pride in the country,
inadvertently resulted in hostility, distrust and suspicion towards them, mostly by France and Britain (Kyle, 2011, p.115).
Meanwhile, the British and the French were colonial powers which prior to the start of the Second World War, had empires which were large and
expansive. They had colonies in the Carribean, in Africa, as well as in Asia. Whilst both countries came out of the war as victors, they had suffered
embarrassing early defeats to Japan and Germany respectively, which was a knock to colonial prestige (Nairn, 2003, p.3). The post–war scenario was
one in which colonies like Indochina and India rose up to demand independence and the right for self–determination from their previous rulers. It was
clear to many in this time period that the traditional system of empire was finished, and with it the power of previous colonial rulers (Hyam, 2006,
p.239). Britain and France, not surprisingly, were unwilling to let this happen. When Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal, they saw this as a threat to
their already diminishing empire, as not only would it lead 'inevitably to the loss one by one of all our interests and assets in the Middle East' (Hyam,
2006, p.227), it would also lead to an increase in distance between their

The Suez Crisis: Canada's Middle Power
Currently, Canada is known as a middle power as on many occasions Canada has proved themselves as more than just a country. A middle power is a
sovereign state that does not have too much power but influences the world in a good way. There are three prominent times that Canada has proved
themselves as more than just a country. For example, the Suez Crisis was a military and political confrontation that took place in Egypt. It was over
the Suez Canal which was an artificial waterway in Egypt that connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea. The Suez Crisis threatened to divide the
United States and Great Britain, potentially harming the Western military alliance as well. During this crisis,Canada was not affected in any sort of
way. However, Canada's soon–to–be Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson, spent much of his time involving himself and trying to find a solution to the
crisis. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The peacekeeping force consisted of military soldiers from 130 different countries in the United Nations. After the peacekeeping force idea, Pearson
stated to the other countries that "peace is far more than ceasing to fire". After hearing this from Pearson, 57 UN states voted in favour of the idea
and no country voted against the peacekeeping mission. The peacekeeping mission was a plan to send the United Nations military to sign an
agreement and stop the crisis without anyone having to admit defeat. Soon after the voting, UN peacekeepers went into the Canal Zone to figure out
an agreement. Ultimately this action won Lester B. Pearson the Nobel Prize and also helped Canada emerge as a middle

History Of Westminster Students At Model United Nations
Westminster Students At Model UN
With their name placards held high and their western business attire well–tailored, 36 students from Westminster took off into the ever–changing world
of foreign policy. From November 18–21, the students were tasked with representing the United States of America, Guam, and the Maldives in the
American Model United Nations conference in Chicago, Illinois. The aim for the delegates at the conference is to accurately represent the foreign
policy of their nation in one of several committees and councils modeled after the actual United Nations in New York City.
The committees ranged in purview from the United Nations Security Council to the Conference of the States Parties of the Organization for the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Suez crisis refers to an event that occurred in October of 1956 where the Egyptian government led by nationalist president Abdul Gamal Nasser
nationalized at took over the Suez Canal which was owned by a joint corporation between the United Kingdom and France. The U.K. and France then
responded with a military counter attack with Israeli troops that took the world to the brink of nuclear war.
In the 1994 council, Bakewell and Keich debated the issues of the Bosnian civil war and the dissolution of Yugoslavia and theRwandan Genocide. The
Rwandan Genocide was an event that occurred in the spring of 1994 which involved the slaughter of ethnic Tutsis by the Hutu majority in Rwanda as a
result of the civil war that had occurred throughout the 1990s between the Hutu majority Rwandan government and the Tutsi dominated Rwandan
Patriotic Front (RPF), the casualties of which were upwards of 800,000 men, women, and children.
The conference was not completely a good time had by all, as it had been reported that one of the delegations had been in a major auto accident after
leaving AMUN in Chicago. Several students from Missouri Southern State University were injured and one was killed following an eight car accident
that occurred Thursday on I–55. Sophomore Vivian Wu was killed after representing Iceland at the same conference in Chicago. The Model UN
program issued the following statement: "It is with deep sadness that we pass along the news

The Suez Crisis : A Unique And Unusual Time Period
An alliance is defined as a union or association formed for mutual benefit. Alliances can be made politically and on many other platforms. The Suez
Crisis was a unique and unusual time period for United States foreign policy, especially concerning their allies. Many decisions made were not
representative of typical American foreign policy. When the fear and threat of the spread of Soviet communism was recognized, even the strongest and
longest lasting relationships with Britain, France, and Israel were forgone. The priority of the Americans became controlling the spread of communism,
since everything else came second. During the Suez Crisis, the American foreign policy sacrificed the strength of their relationships with close allies in
the pursuit of the containment of communism and the Soviet Union.
Even agreements and treaties made with Egypt, the country that holds the stage of the Suez Crisis, were created and then also retracted by the
United States for the cause of containing communism. Gamal Abdel Nasser rose to power in Egypt via a non violent coup, in which he was the
backstage leader. He was later elected president and it is stated that Nasser had "three goals: to make Egypt independent by ending British occupation;
to build up Egyptian forces for a successful attack on Israel; to improve Egypt's economy by constructing a high dam at Aswan to irrigate the Nile
valley." (Milner) He made his intentions clear and tried to achieve them, especially by launching attacks

Canada 's Most Appreciated Peacekeeping Country

Canadian Peacekeeping

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jessica Anderson

More from Jessica Anderson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Canadian Peacekeeping