The Colonists Should Be Separate From Great Britain

The Colonists Should Be Separate From Great Britain
The American Revolution started on April 19, 1775 and lasted until September 3, 1783. This time was important in history. It will always be
remembered until today. The American Revolution was the worst thing ever! The Colonist should have had independence and be separate from Great
Britain. The American Revolution made people separate and not be together and have relationships with each other. The Native Americans had a
hunting ground that the Colonist could not go to. The British did not treat people fairly and they made people do wrong things. The Colonist should
have independence and be separate from Great Britain because the Native Americans had hunting grounds. The British did not allow Colonist to go
on or to the hunting grounds. In the text it stated that. "The Native Americans used the reserved land for "hunting grounds" and King George hoped
it would not cause any costly wars between the Colonist and Indians. The Colonist wanted to use this ground and go to it but The British did not
allow them to. This would cause a war and the British would join in and take over and end up owning the land and it would be hard for everyone. The
British made it hard for everyone that went to the land. They would have made them pay taxes, they would work, and much more.... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The British did not treat colonist fairly they treated them very poorly. They shot at innocent people for no reason according to the text. That was the
start of the Boston Massacre that started in 1770. The British government also collected taxes and charged taxes over the colonies. The colonies did
not want these laws and taxes and because of that they were treated very poorly. They did not want England to have control over
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Hadrians Wall Analysis
The essay is going to discuss the purpose of the Hadrian's Wall built. " Hadrian was the first to build a wall, eighty miles long to separate the
Romans from the barbarians (the Picts / the Brigantes)." (1) It took three of Britain's legions around 15,000 men 6 years to construct since AD 122
which is located at the narrowest part of the Island with a natural ridge at the central part which offers a great position on defense. (2) Edward N.
Luttwak (1976) has indicated the wall's fortifications including the forts, trenches and soldiers house did suggest a military motivation. (3) However,
from the duration and pattern of the construction, it does not seem to build for defensive purposes only, but furthermore – A multipurpose. The essay
will be focusing on the wall's political purpose, thus indicating that it was not built for defensive purposes originally. The military purpose was not the
first consideration when the wall was built. In fact, before the installation of the wall, the northern tribes have been defeated at the battle of Mons
Graupius at AD 85 by the Romans. At the same time, the Romans pushed northwards to the current Scotland. Yet, the terrain increasingly mountainous
and boggy obstruct the occupation, the Romans couldn't consolidate their economic profit and slowly retreating to the southward. (4) It shows the
Romans did have the ability to defeated intruders even without the wall, therefore the need of the wall is not urgent. Basically, it would cost years

Why Britain Should Leave The Eu
Lately in the EU, the economy has been booming, politics have been great, and trade is bigger than ever. What better time than now to leave the
economic safety and success of the EU? Lately in the EU, the economy has been booming, politics have been great, and trade is bigger than ever.
What better time than now to leave the economic safety and success of the EU?
The United Kingdom should not leave the EU because it would hurt trade, mess up it's own economy, and may tear apart the EU.
The first reason why Britain shouldn't leave the EU is because it would hurt trade. A major benefit of the EU is the trade. Combined, all the countries
in the EU have a large influence over world trade. This allows them to get more money for other EU countries.

Should Elgin Marbles Stay In Britain?
The debate on whether the Elgin Marbles should stay in Britain or be returned to their original home in Greece has been going on for a few decades
now. As a curator of a Turkish museum that is the home to many Greek art works, I believe that the art work in Britain should remain there for
multiple reasons, the main one being that if the British decide to give the marbles back to the Greeks, would the Greeks decide that they want the art
work that we have here in Turkey back? The main, non–personal, reason I believe the art works should stay in Britain is because it would take a large
portion of time and require a huge financial contribution. This contribution would most likely have to be provided by the British because the Greeks
would only

George Orwell Shooting An Elephant Summary
George Orwell's anecdote of "Shooting an Elephant" from 1936 was written for a literary magazine to inform British citizens of the struggles he
experienced while working his restricting job, and begins with him dwelling on the concept that he is alone, and the only company he has is the
pressuring wills of the 2,000 Indians watching him handle a rifle. He continually arguing against himself on whether or not to shoot the elephant, but
the tyrannical British government he works for has placed him alone as a policeman in India with no one to agree with and talk him into doing what
Orwell believes to be the best choice, leaving him with the pressure to adhere to 2,000 Indians' desires that comply with British laws, resulting in his
obedience. The ease of this for the despotic British government motivates them to pursue this act of control.
Orwell begins this passage by talking about the "immense crowd" that was continuously growing to watch him shoot the elephant. The Indian's interest
in him skyrocketed when this harmful act became his task. These beginning 11 lines were written to highlight the fact that everyone watching was
expecting something phenomenal to come from him, which developed an enormous amount of pressure to decide whether or not to shoot the elephant.
Orwell states "it was an immense crowd, two thousand at the least and growing every minute", which is either true, and shows that he had actual
thousands of people expecting him to kill the elephant, putting on

Explain The Reasons Why Britain Should Remain In The...
Grace Parker
3AB
February 28, 2016
"Cameron: Britain's Referendum on EU Membership to Be June 23."The New York Times. The New York Times, 19 Feb. 2016. Web. 29 Feb. 2016.
This article explains the "on–going" argument of whether or not Britain should remain in the European Union or leave. Prime Minister David Cameron
vowed to keep Britain apart, winning the backing of most of most of his Cabinet and the goal of rival parties. Cameron has made it clear Britain is
safer and stronger in the EU. However, much of Britain believes in opposition to their membership among the the European Union, leaving this as a
constant

Economic Factors Of The English Colonization Of North America
I believe that we cannot say that only one factor had an impact on English colonization, as both had a fairly significant influence. In retrospect the fact
that Economic factors did have a greater impact remains true. Merchants that migrated to North America formed Jamestown as the first settlement and
were searching for fortune and a better living then they could have in England. Jamestown was founded under the Virginia Company, these English joint
stock companies were appointed for this reason – to produce successful settlements. Another reason contributing to the English colonization of North
America were the economic problems and concerns that plagued the English. For this reason they went to the Americas in search of raw materials
such as gold and silver. Even people that were not merchants, or wealthy businessmen migrated to Americas solely for the bettering of their and their
loved ones lives, by farming or other jobs available at the time. Others ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people converted to Protestantism as Catholicism was become much too controlling of people and individuals did not have as much freedom as
they rightfully should have had. To add to this– King Henry VIII forced the Anglican Church upon English men which some obviously did not want to
obtain. After this both Catholics and Protestants were rejected by their fellow Englishmen, fined, or even in extreme cases sent to jail. It seemed as if
in this moment of time no religion could bond together the English people. All of these factors accumulated and religious warfare was prospering,
blood was being spilled every day, so a considerable amount of people looked towards the North American colonies (to migrate there.) So the country
was a religious, economic and political disaster, and many saw great promise in the New World, and believed they could create the perfect

The Battle Of Britain Is Regarded As The Most Famous...
The Battle of Britain is regarded as the most famous military engagement of World War II. The fall of France in June 1940 to Nazi Germany not only
left Britain as the only European power working actively against the Germans but also left them vulnerable to bombing campaigns launched from
Northern France, having only to travel twenty–five miles across the English Channel to reach targets in south–east England1. The quick surrender of
France allowed German forces to direct their attention towards Britain. Although Hitler had publicly stated a desire to negotiate peace terms with
Britain, preparations had been made for an amphibious invasion of the British Isles, codenamed Operation Sealion2. German High Command was
aware of the fact that... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Battle of Britain marked a major turning point in the war, akin to the Battle of Moscow in the east, as it was the first time the German advance
had been stopped. Had Britain fallen to the Third Reich during the summer of 1940, the repercussions would have been enormous. Hitler would have
completed his conquest of Europe; there would have been no possibility of an invasion on the beaches of Normandy, enabling Hitler to dedicate more
resources for Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union. The invention of radar, known as Radio Direction Finding (RDF) at the time, by
the Department of Scientific and Industrial research in 1934 initially allowed aircraft to be detected at a distance of thirty–eight miles. By 1937,
improvements to RDF had enabled it to see aircraft at a range of one hundred miles, complete with the bearing of enemy aircraft4. The British
recognized the potential of RDF to be used simultaneously with other electronic and communication aids to provide an early–detecting system. The
development of an early–warning system was essential to the British war effort due to the length of the coastline being so close to enemy–occupied
territory, with important commercial, industrial and military centres well within the range of enemy aircraft5. An early–warning system also had two
distinct advantages over traditional aircraft patrolling of the British coastline. It

Contingency Planning And Its Effects On The Environment
Koslo Ford
Contingency Planning
4–17–16
Contingency Planning
The worldwide outage caused by the electromagnetic pulse due to the solar storm would affect most of the operations that take place globally (Davis,
2003). Since internationalization entails interdependence with other countries, it implies that the world will be at a standstill. The economic processes,
social and political activities will stagnate. However, suppose the world becomes aware of the catastrophe, governments and different social institutions
in various countries would employ some contingencies that will enable them to continue thriving. Various changes will occur in the social life, and
most of them would be inclined to the downside. For instance, the health sector will be at mess because most hospitals use power in the modern world,
leading to the decline in the health services. The education sector is also not an exception. The digitalization of learning systems in the civilized
society made learning easier. Since the systems use power, education will also be altered. Thus, the outage will paralyze the learning activities
globally. Davis (2003) argues that the worldwide shortage of power will also cause unemployment to people who work in power–driven companies.
Since they operate and rely on electricity and digitalized communication systems, their production processes will stop, leading to their closure, and
cause people to who used to work there lose their jobs.
The deficiency in communication

Boudicca Significance
For my investigation, I chose to evaluate the significance of Boudicca and her impact on British history. This was topic that really interested me as
I had seen the statue of her in London and thought her story was fascinating. All I knew about her was that was she was an ancient Celtic Queen
who opposed the occupying forces of Rome then poisoned herself so that she couldn't be held prisoner. However, there was an abundance of
information that available for me to use so I could find out more about my chosen personality. There were many advantages to choosing Boudicca to
investigate, however, I had to work around the issue of reliability within many of the sources. Despite that, this topic proved to be a good choice for
me. I've always had an interest in British history. To me, Boudicca was a personality that seemed to have a significant impact and influence within this
topic, and as such seemed like the best person for me to investigate. She was a strong and inspiring... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I was unsure as to what type of information I would find on Boudicca and if there was an appropriate controversy I could investigate. I started by
doing general research on her to gain a historical context, and then I started narrowing it down to why she and the other Celt's revolted against the
Roman's, and what impact this had on society. During this started developing my thesis, which went through a series of adjustments until I decided
upon evaluate the significance of Boudicca and her impact on British history. I then gathered all of the information I was going to use in my
investigation, and analysed the sources that this was coming from to ensure everything was correct. Once I started, I was surprised by how much I
was able to find and how relevant most of the information was. I was able to then easily develop my question and then start focussing my research
gathering onto certain aspects of Boudicca's life and

Essay on Why Britain Won the Battle of Britain
Why Britain Won the Battle of Britain
After taking France in addition to his list of captured countries on mainland Europe, Adolf Hitler set his sights on Britain. After the success of
Blitzkrieg, the evacuation of Dunkirk and the surrender of France, Britain was by herself. However, before Hitler could contemplate undertaking an
invasion he was advised by his generals that Germany had to destroy the Fighter Command of the Royal Air Force in order to gain superiority in the air.
This would in turn enable him to gain control of the English Channel in order to transfer the 160,000 German troops on the 2000 invasion barges,
which had been assembled in German, French and Belgian harbors, over the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, under the category of technology I could say that one reason why Britain won the battle of Britain was because they had the services of
the radar system.
Firstly, the tactics employed by both sides would play a key role in itself to deciding the outcome of the Battle of Britain. The battle started on July
10th 1940 when the Luftwaffe attempted to gain control of the Straits of Dover. The tactics employed by the Luftwaffe was to tempt the RAF out for a
full–scale battle. However, by the end of July, the RAF had lost 150 aircraft while the Luftwaffe had lost 268. These figures illustrate that there was
a much greater loss of aircraft experienced by Germany than the British. These large losses of planes from the outset of a battle would have been a
significant blow to any army however, this would have damaged German morale as a greater loss of planes was not something they would have
contemplated and as they were coming into this battle with such high expectations, this would have been a significant blow to the Luftwaffe and a
stern wake up call to their commanders. However, Britain too was suffering, it was the loss of trained pilots that was crippling the RAF, and the real
battle had yet to begin. In August, the Luftwaffe changed their tactics and started to attack Fighter Command's airfields, operation rooms and radar
stations – the idea being that the RAF

Relationship Between British And Native Americans
The seventeenth century was a prime era for early America, with many historic happenings. From the first British settlers invading on pre–claimed
Native American land to continual friction between the two, the relationship between the two groups was unstable and dangerous. The Native
Americans originally considered trying to become allies with the English, but as time went on, a war would emerge between Natives and the English
settlers as to control the land. The English and Native American relationship changed drastically due to two main factors: English seeking religious
freedom and economic prosperity. First, English seeking religious freedom caused a shift in the English/Native initial relationship, like the pilgrims did
a whole century before. The English wanted to incorporate their Christian relationship into the Natives religion, as said in Document 1. "Be it enacted
by this present assembly that for laying a surer foundation of the conversion of the Indians to Christian religion, each town, city, borough, and
particularly plantation..." The English wanted to put a vital part of their everyday life into the lives of the Natives living and thriving around them.
Another source, Source 3, was Matthaes Merian, "An Indian Massacre of 1622," which was initiated by religion. In 1622, it was apparent to the Indians
that the colonists intended to expand their holdings in Virginia. The Indians felt threatened by this physical expansion, but were even more concerned
about the

Examples Of Individualism In Bend It Like Beckham
Great Britain is widely recognized as a typical country of cultural diversities because of a myriad of migrants coming to this promising land annually.
The film " Bend it like Beckham", directed by a British–Indian woman, Gurinder Chadha who may have experienced intercultural dilemmas deserves a
perfect illustration for such issues. This film, which was first on display in 2002, has obtained great success in representing the differences between the
English culture and the Sikh culture. This essay aims at digging deep into three aspects which are costume, gender role and individualism vs.
collectivism reflected in the film from the perspective of intercultural communication.
The film revolves around a 18–year–old Indian woman named Jessminder ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The movie highlights the importance of staying true to your identity on happiness, rather than letting others influence your decisions. The main
character overcomes many cultural obstacles to be herself and pursue her real

Persuasive Essay: Britain Should Leave The European Union
Whether UK should leave or stay with EU has recently become one of the most widely debated subjects and British citizens will soon have to
decide their future in the EU as Prime Minister David Cameron has promised a referendum on 'leave or stay' question to the British people by
2017. This came at the time of Eurozone crisis when most of EU citizens including British are losing faith in EU, making the distance between EU
institutions and EU citizens ever greatest. The reason for British people's resentment is the lack of democracy: EU dictatorship, too many
unnecessary laws and regulations to follow. Of course, there are Brexiteers who call for the UK to quit in order to regain national sovereignty and to
be more democratic than they are now and those who want to stay. The essay to expresses disagreement to the statement that UK would be more
democratic if it votes to leave EU. There are various factors behind the possible leaving the EU. There is a growing concern among the Brexit when
EU exists as a superpower and the status of Britain is threatened. Questions also arise as what benefit Britain... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The UK should participate as the role of the originator for European democracy improvement and make use of its role to the benefit all its citizens.
The serious democratic deficit is not only at European level but is also a particular problem in Britain. Being part of the EU, all the 28 member states
will have a substantial role to play in order to improve political participation and disengagement in any country including Britain. Political
disengagement shall not be limited to national scene –in particular when EU faces pressing challenges to democracy deficit. Leaving EU will not make
Britain more democratic instead staying with EU Britain can do more good and will help to strengthen democratic institutions both in Britain itself and
the EU (Buruma,

London Blitz Research Paper
The terrible air raids on London, also known as the Blitz, began in September of 1940 and were the beginning of World War II ("Worst Air Raid on
London"). It was a devastating time for the English, especially with Adolf Hitler, the leader of the air raids, and his Luftwaffe was showing no mercy
on anyone. Even though London faced a rough point in their lives, had no weapons or materials to fight back, and were loosing homes and loved ones,
they somehow managed to pull through come out strong. The English always had each others back and came up with their own tactics of survival, and
although London lost terribly against Germany, they never lost their will to pursue to fight and keep their heads held high. They made their own air
raid kits, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Germany attacked London first, dropping V1 and V2 rockets from aircrafts ("World War II"). They called these rockets flying bombs and
nicknamed the V1 rocket the Doodlebug. The Doodlebug had no pilot and made a droning noise after it was dropped all the way until it hit the
ground because they traveled at such a great speed. From the time that the Doodlebug was dropped people had only a short fifteen seconds to take
cover before the rocket would make contact with the ground. Although the Doodlebugs did serious damage when they landed, most of them were
duds and many of them never made contact with land. Over 10,000 Doodlebugs were launched, but only and estimated 2,500 ever made contact
with land. The V2's were silent bombs that made no noise whatsoever. They were much faster and way more efficient than the original V1 rockets.
They flew so fast once they were dropped that nobody was able to shoot them down. Even though the V1 and V2 rockets were a better tactic of
attacks on Germany's side, they were much too expensive to make in mass. As a result, Germany turned to smaller bombs, such as oil bombs,
incendiary, and high explosive bombs were the most common that blew up whole buildings at once (Barrow). The incendiary bombs were also popular.
They were smaller bombs that started fires that burned uncontrollably when they made contact which lead some to believe that

Analysis Of Patrick Henry 's Speech
"Give me liberty or give me death"
Patrick Henry's speech to the Virginia Convention written and spoken by Patrick Henry raised the people 's attention. He spoke passionate words
because he no longer wanted to be a slave to Britain.The men that attended the Virginia Convention realized that they needed to start fighting back
after all the troubles the British caused. The British terrorized innocent people of America, even killed men, women, and children. In his speech he
proposed resolutions to prepare the Virginia Colony for war and gave the speech to support those resolutions. His reasons for the speech were to
convince the colonist, to try and maintain peace, to persuade war against Britain, and to show that he would be a good president. Patrick Henry's
speech was very effective regarding the Virginia Convention usingethos, pathos, and logos.
Patrick Henry uses a loud, respectful tone to show that he was serious using ethos. He was respectful while he addressed the House, In the speech he
states "No man thinks more highly than I do of patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house. But
different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefor I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining
as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve." He did not

The Frivolity of Evil by Theodore Dalrymple Essay
The article "The Frivolity of Evil" by Theodore Dalrymple analyzes the causes of human misery. His work as a psychiatrist in Great Britains slums
afforded him a great vantage point to analyze this topic "nearer to the fundamental of human existence." He concluded that the citizens of Great Britian
willingly participated in precipitating their own misery. Their are three recurring theme in his article the lack of moral responsibility, extreme
individualism and lack of cultural expectations. Dalrymple begins his article by showing the mind frame of a prisoner released from prison, who had
the idea that he had paid his debt to society. In order to get his point across Dalrymple compares the prisoners situation to his very own, the 14 ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He believed that this shift in thinking leads people to imply that "dissatisfaction with life is itself pathological." The idea that this is an illness that can
be cured by a doctor. Dalrymple believed that this form of thinking stands in the way of people understanding their situation and impedes moral change.
The lack of moral responsibility was a recurring theme he observed in his patients. The patient who claimed "unhappiness" had three different children
by three different men. The fathers of the three children lived a life of criminality and violence. Knowing this she still choose to enter into a
relationship with them regardless of the consequences. What is confounding is the lack of moral responsibility the patients exhibit towards her
children. Their is no punishment from the government or society for the actions she makes. The idea of self interest is prominent is this articles. These
individuals base their decisions on their on self interest. They only have a responsibility to their own happiness. Her actions are due to the fact that she
did not want to remain alone. He mother based her decisions to turn her daughter out based on the thought "that her own sexual liaisons" were more
important than caring for her child. The mother of the patient created a cycle of misery for her daughter that, the daughter in turn will create for her
own children.

Free Anderson Bombing Report
London– Since the 7 of September, London and other cities of Great Britain have been bomb by Germany's Luftwaffe. The death rate of the whole
country is over 60,000 people. With over 2,000,000 people without homes to live in. "The bombing that night began with a shower of slow–burning
incendiaries"– Betty Popkiss as she remembers the horrors that awaited her, that first night. The government informs people that rationing will still
continue, even after the bombing due to the Germans cutting off our main food supply. Free Anderson's shelters are available for anyone who can't
afford the 7 pound shelter. The shelters are for safety reasons for your children to go in when there are bombs and shrapnel falling. The city also
advises that children

Reasons For The Petition Of The Colonies
After the petition of the colonies stating that Great Britain should give consent when comes to taxes, we got response that if we don't reverse our
positions we will be dissolved to self–govern. When we didn't reverse our positions, they immediately dissolved every single one of the assemblies,
which is the most appalling decisions a king can do. You shouldn 't silence the voice of opposing concerns; not only does it shows that youwant a quick
and easy solution, but also that you rather be surround by people who only agrees with you. He dissolved assemblies from all thirteen colonies,
with representatives for each one of them, which further prove how ignorant he is if that doesn't give him a reason to at least negotiate. How can we
make changes if I will be immediately kick off my own position, how will I be able to get my voice heard?
In England there was one right defened for all of the Englishmen in 1688, and that was the right to have a trial by jury. However, King James has been
removing judiciary power from the people in Massachusetts and start paying the judges himself. The judges that are in this positions started to then
give unequal treatment and, most of the time, will denied a trial by jury. It makes me frustrated that a right that we strive for in war doesn't applied in
British America, that I can be considered below a Englishmen. King James obviously doesn't have a vision for his people here, and that we are here
just to benefit him alone.
In Annaplois,

Why the Boudica Fought the Romans Essay
Why the Boudica Fought the Romans
The History of the Celtic People
The Iceni were a Celtic tribe which resided in Norfolk and Suffolk in the east of Britain. Boadicea was part of this noble and warlike people, the Keltoi
or in Latin, Celtae.
The Celts of the first century appear to be farmers, traders and crafts people. Frank Delaney 1989 quotes from Strabo writing in the first century
saying "They wear ornaments of gold, torcs on their necks and bracelets on their arms and wrists, while people of high rank wear dyed garments
besprinkled with gold." He also quotes from Diodurus Siculus also first century who writes "They accumulate large quantities of gold and make use of
it for personal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ritualistic in their worship, imaginative in their art, they competed in physical contests and intellectual gaming; they were economically successful,
enterprising and proud."
Due to flourishing trade across the English Channel with the Roman empire, their merchants and rulers prospered, issuing their own coinage between
about 65 BC and AD 61.
Fig.1 shows Iceni silver coin from hoard, AD 61. During the revolt there were large issues of Iceni silver coins, some eventually buried in caches
containing hundreds of examples. This silver unit from AD 61 shows a stylised Iceni Warrior, wearing a feathered headdress.
Near the end of this period, following the Roman invasion of Britain under Claudius in AD 43, king Prasutagus (AD 50–60) became a rich and
powerful client of the Romans. After his death, however, the Roman administrators in Britain made the Iceni a subject population. The Roman emperor
Nero's representative Decanius Catus moved with incredible haste to do an inventory of the property of the Iceni and their late king. Prasutagus had
left a will in which he left half of the property to the emperor, and the other half to his two daughters. The Romans declared the will invalid, and carried
out the inventory.
Prasutagus' wife was Boudicca. She was described as being a large woman, with flaming red hair.

"She was

Should Britain Apologise For The Slave Trade?
During the transatlantic slave trade, Britain were one of the main powers involved, begging the question: should Britain apologise for the slave trade?
When discussing this question, there are several factors which should be considered. These factors include; whether Britain is responsible or
individual cities, compared to other countries if Britain was that bad and, as it happened two hundred years ago, if we should move on and forget it.
By considering these factors, it will be argued that Britain should apologise.
Whilst some may argue that individual cities throughout Britain are to blame as opposed to the entire nation there is clear evidence contradicting this.
An estimated 70% of British government income between 1750 and 1780 came from the slave trade and the goods produced from it. This therefore
shows that the entirety of Britain felt the benefits of the slave trade. Furthermore, these goods created a thriving tobacco trade in Glasgow, a trade built
almost entirely on the tobacco produced by African slaves in America and the Colonies. This is not the only Scottish connection toslavery – in 1796,
nearly 30% of estates in Jamaica were owned by Scots. There is also evidence of Scottish newspapers such as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
This is due to the fact that the entirety of Britain felt the benefits and was involved in the slave trade, not just the commonly credited port cities.
Meanwhile, in comparison to other countries, Britain enjoyed the most success, both economically and in terms of new territory, thus making Britain
no better than the other European powers involved. Although some may argue that it is now too late for an apology to be worthwhile, the evidence of
slavery's impact still alive today backs this up further by proving that time has not changed the need for an apology. The evidence overall backs the
argument that Britain should apologise for their involvement in the transatlantic slave

Analysis Of George Churchill 's ' The Great Gatsby '
Exordium On behalf of Mrs. Churchill, the Churchill family, the British nation, and those around the world, we bid farewell to a great man, leader, and
friend. This day I am both honored and saddened. I am honored to have this opportunity to highlight his life. I am saddened that the world will no
longer have him. A man who brought his country and its citizens through terrible destruction. Churchill was a friend with whom the differences
between us were vast. Our stance and opinions regarding our nations and the world, no closer. They divided not only us but also our people and
prolonged the possibility of world peace. Churchill persevered with tenacity and vigor to change my mind, to no avail. Every dispute is freshly etched
in my ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People turned to him in times of trouble to find a compassionate, courageous human being that cared about them and their well–being. Churchill had a
gift to bring peace and unity through his excellent speaking ability and genuine concern for his common man. He instilled trust and belief in people
that the government figures honestly cared. With this, Churchill offered hope and conveyed confidence to his fellow Britons. He displayed his
famous "V" hand gesture to represent that he wanted to be victorious. He would often survey the damage from the daily bombings and console the
weary. On a morning after a night bombing, Churchill watched a woman pulled from the rubble. The woman asked Churchill, "When are we going to
bomb Berlin?" Churchill replied, "You leave that to me." He gave hope and confidence to the people who turned to him. In doing so, he created unity,
courage, and peace to those around him. Churchill made every effort to offer optimism to the people of Britain and the world. He truly wanted to
protect the citizens of his homeland from harm and the tragedy that loomed around them. He endured in times of despair. It is tragic that this war has
begun and caused such destruction and chaos. Britain alone has suffered from the loss of thousands of homes and lives. I believe in freedom for all,
and I also believe in supporting a man. His great courage and strength have led his country to this

Battle Of Britain Research Paper
The Battle of Britain in World War II
Name
Institution
The Battle of Britain in World War II
The Battle of Britain was an encounter between British air force, the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the German air force, the Luftwaffe. The aerial battle
took place in the United Kingdom in 1940. Germany had planned an invasion, named "Operation Sealion", in Britain. For Germany to execute the
attack successfully, they had to eliminate the British air force to avoid it from interfering with the invasion. German's first attack was in August of 1940
on British airfields and cities targeting to bring out the RAF and wipe them down (Tedder, 2010). Britain used its RADA technology, even with
Germany's underestimation, to decode Germany's communication ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even after The British won over the Germans, Hitler continued to control all of Western Europe, and the German success dominated the headlines as
opposed to the British success. Germany continued to bomb Britain, and they claimed other combat success, like under Wehrmacht with the Soviet
Union. However, what was clear was that Germany had for the first time in world history been matched in military power and technology. Britain
acquired a significant victory in its strategic plans over German's poorly planned and coordinated strategies. Previously, Germany had overcome its
opponents quickly and rudely to prevent them from uniting and producing modern weapons (Browne, 2004). Hitler's strategy succeeded in France,
Denmark, Poland, Norway, Belgium, and Netherlands. Hence, the success of Britain meant that the Battle of Britain would be an extended war against
the superior Allied resources that Germany would apply to embarrass Britain. Hitler understood that a defeat by Britain would create a major enemy in
the West when it embarked on attacking the Soviet Union. Further, the United States would get more time to rebuild its forces and arms and would
have a significant ally when it went into

Failure of the Battle of Britain Campaign Essays
In the summer of 1940, Adolf Hitler began operation "Sea–Lion," or better known as the Battle of Britain. This was the plot to destroy the British RAF
so that a German landing on the beaches of England and air assault could be possible. Because of the failure of the battle of Britain campaign, the
course of the war was changed in the allies favor, and, Hitler's plan for European domination was halted. The early stages of the war were dominated
by Germany, attacking Europe in quick succession. The ground forces quickly overwhelmed the European nations with the support of aircraft. The
Luftwaffe quickly gained air superiority. In early May 1940, the Norway Debates began to question the competence of Britain current Prime Minister,
Neville... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
it was a powerful aircraft with a liquid cooled Damlier–Benz DB–601 engine giving it 1,085 horsepower. A 3 bladed VDM variable pitch Propeller
gave it an excellent climb speed of 17.5 m/s. also the aircraft had a low relatively low weight and giving it a high power to weight ratio. At high
altitude the BF–109E could outfly the competition thanks to a 2 stage turbo–supercharger. The Fighter was also heavily armed. The plane sported two
7.92 synchronized machine guns in firing through the propellers with 1000 rounds per gun, and 2 MGFF 20–mm cannons firing through the propeller
arch. Each cannon had 60 rounds per gun. Ammunition was limited with the cannons, but one well–placed burst could critically damage or destroy a
fighter. Because of their strengths, the BF–109 was used as fighter hunter and interceptor. The Germans also used heavy fighters to escort the bombers
and dive bombers. The BF–110 was a dual–engine, heavy fighter with heavy firepower. The BF–110 has two DB–605 engines, each with 1,185
horsepower. These aircraft had a climb speed of 10.5 m/s, which was slow, but, impressive for an aircraft its size the aircraft had a large airframe, and
heavier weight, making it a slower less maneuverable aircraft.so, what the BF–110 lack in agility, it made up in firepower. This aircraft had 4, 7.92
machine guns which were housed in the nose. Also the aircraft usually carried 2 MG FF cannons, but it wasn't unusual to see

##a And Germania By TacitusAgricola And Germania
Tacitus wrote Agricola and Germania by Tacitus as a historical account for the Roman Empire and its affairs around 98 AD. The first part of the book
is a personal tribute to his father–in–law Agricola whom he so dearly honored. Based on the first sentences of his book, he is compelled to tell the
story of a man who is worthy to be written about and remembered. He mentions in the first part of his book that a personal that "men even felt that to
tell their own life's story showed self–confidence rather than conceit". Tacitus acknowledges the continual risk of written history about a person or the
Roman Empire's history as a whole. However, Tacitus, "...robbed by informers even of the interchange of speech. We would not have lost our
memories as well as our tongues had it been an easy to forget as to be silent". With that same courage Tacitus begins to write the eulogy of his
father–in–law Agricola. He speaks on his historical family background and the personal achievements he accomplished while still alive. Tacitus close
relationship with his father–in–law allows him to give not only an account of Agricola's conquered over Britain but he is able to give a personal
account about his character as well. Tacitus admired his father–in–law because of his genuine and honest character, Agricola stood out to him to be a
noble man unlike the rest of the military commander in the Roman Empire. Tacitus continues to praise Agricola for his noble character and mentioned
he "...succeeded

Essay On We Should Be Under The King Of Great Britain
Do you people of America think that we should be under the king of England's control? I say that we should not be under the control of Great
Britain. We should be our own country not under any tyrants control. The loyalists have been creating problems for the patriots because the
patriots are not following the rules of the king from England gave them. The king's rules are not fair because he only cares about money, business,
and his country, not ours. We need a king that is fair and cares about everyone, not just his own. I am a patriot because I think that we should be an
independent country that should have our own rules and do what we want, not under the control of a tyrant kings rules that is in England. And we
would be better off without England controlling us and our trade. We also won't be free to buy anything we'd like, not forced to by English
manufactured goods. We need to have a fair ruler of our own, not someone that is a tyrant and is in England. Some unfair laws that take away our
rights are, taxing us but not saying how we are governed, forcing us to only buy East India Tea Company tea, and allowing... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Some people may ask Why being an independent country is better? Being an independent country is better because we will not be forced to buy
English manufactured goods, We will learn to make our own manufactured, and we will not take advantage of our own people by taxing them but
not telling them how they are governed. These reasons are why we would be better of as our own country instead of under Great Britain.
Separation from England can be bad for our business, because the English will not be able to provide us with a market of their goods. Even though
it could be bad for business, we should still separate from England because then we could learn how to take control on our own and learn what is is
like to be your own

Colonists Should Break Away From Britain Essay
Dear;Colonist
Do you think the colonist should break away from Britain? The colonist should break away from the terrible country of britain. The British don't treat
the colonist well. The British king had destroyed the peace of the colonist originally wanted. The British king had endangered the lives of the
colonist. The king has a sullen temper. The colonist should break away from britain. The colonist have lost the peace that they deserve. "No man was
a warmer wisher for a [peaceful settlement] than myself, before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775." This proves that the colonist have lost their peace
after the war. The cannt live in a peaceful world without war. The king ofengland have endangered the lives of colonist with the troops he have sent
over to the colonies.The picture shows that the British have shot the colonist and some are dyed on the ground. Even the colonist had no weapons the
british killed them. That shows that the British ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Having a bad tempered king can cause a lot of bad stuff that can happen to the colonist. The king has proved that his bad temper has affected the
colonist like when the king cause the war of Lexington and concord and cause the colonist to lose their peace. Some would say that the colonist
should break away from Great Britain. Some people don't want to break away from britain is because of the horror and misery britain will do to
us."Other inevitably conducting you to Anarchy, Misery, and all the Horrors of a Civil War." That shows that if the colonist choose that way it will
cause misery and war. The colonist are already in misery. "No man was a warmer wisher for a [peaceful settlement] than myself, before the fatal
nineteenth of April, 1775." Thats shows that the colonist are in the world of misery with no peace. So they should break away from Great

Britain Should Be Closed Immigration Essay
Should Britain close its doors on immigration?
Look around. What do you see? Immigration everywhere. In the news, workplaces and so on. This flooding of people has to stop. Britain is full. I
for one have had enough and it's been made clear that the people of Britain have to. According to an Ipsos Mori poll, Immigration is one of the most
commonly mentioned worry of the British voter. Our country simply cannot cope and I'm here to tell you why. The doors of immigration cannot
simply be closed; they need to be forced against the ever growing tidal wave that is immigration.
Immigration is having massive effects on many public sectors, but one of the most prominent is the education system as there is a huge amount of
strain being put on UK schools. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to a study carried out by Steve Doughty of the Daily Mail. The increase in the number of people living in the UK was higher than any other
country in the European Union. According to a study conducted by migration watch uk "In 2001 the population of the UK was estimated to be 59.1
million with 4.9 million (8.3%) foreign born. In 2011 the population of the UK had increased by 4.1 million to 63.2 million with the foreign born
population at 8 million (12.6%). In 2015, the population of the UK is estimated to be around 65 million."
It has been estimated that births to foreign–born parents has accounted for 85% of population growth since 2000
There will also be a huge impact on our roads. The congestion/traffic will increase by over one third in the next fifteen years according to migration
watch uk. Simply put more people= more public transport congestion. Can we really take any more and you will remember this on the subway in
London when you can't get to work. It has been estimated that immigration will result in requiring another 850 million litres of water in the next 20
years.
To conclude I ask you this: Based on what I have told you today can we really take any

Examine the Claim That Britishness Is Defined by Shared...
Evaluate the claim that British identity is defined by shared values.
"National identities are only one among the many identities that people can hold", (Clarke, 2009, p.212). How people perceive themselves and are
perceived by others as British poses the question as to what Britishness is and who counts as British? To evaluate the role, shared values play in
defining the British Identity it is necessary to examine how it is formed through place, culture, ethnicity, diversity and imagined community, without
judgements being made as to who should and should not be included.
Individuals if asked to describe themselves will do so in many different ways, but will give reference to family, peer groups, ethnic groups, gender and
class, all ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The values referred to earlier by Blunkett and Phillips are being used to describe Britain by the means of shared values. Blunkett also suggests that
Britain's institutions such as the NHS and the BBC stand for these values. They both use language such as "inclusive" or "open" to suggest that
British identity is "open to all citizens", (Clarke, 2009, p.221). That "British is as British does. It is about what people do, not who they are", (Phillips
cited in Clarke, 2009, p.223). Statements such as these, relating to "national identities are often intended to persuade people to think or act in a certain
way", (Clarke, 2009, p.214).
Parekh supports the view that "Britain has become a multi–ethnic and multicultural society and must develop a more multiple and complex national
identity", (cited in Clarke, 2009, p.225). In opposition to this is the view that "diversity may have gone 'too far', undermining national identity and
the forms of social solidarity that 'keeps us together'", (Clarke, 2009, p.225). Goodhart writes about two forms of diversity," value" and "ethnic". He
describes how Britain has changed over the last sixty years from one where it was possible to predict "the attitudes, even behaviour of the people
living in your immediate neighbourhood" to one with "greater diversity in lifestyles and values", (Goodhart cited in Clarke, 2009, p.225). The increase
in

Should Britain Join The European Union For Economic...
Britain decided to leave the European Union for economic reasons in what the world has called, "Brexit"; the British Exit. The Prime Minister and
many of his supporters believed that the EU was impeding on British sovereignty as well as British interests, such as trade, economic spending, and
immigration. This is relevant to Americans because with the recent election, many are comparing Donald Trump's election to be president to Britain
leaving the European Union. It is said that some of Trump's supporters believed that there needed to be a change. Those people believed that the past
governments were also impeding on American sovereignty, along with American trade, economic spending and immigration. So the American "brexit"
is seen as the people electing Donald Trump. But the Brexit has had many effects that are not encouraging. It has reduced global economic growth
already in the short term, which could extend to the long term and effect global markets more than it has already. The main global issue that the Brexit
has caused global economic growth to decline, and this decline is expected to extend to the long term if things keep going this way. A main reason that
this Brexit has caused global economic growth to decline is because Germany and the United Kingdom work closely together, as well as much of other
parts of Europe. Because Germany's automotive industry is very dependent on the United Kingdom. The Brexit is reducing British imports by 12.5
percent which will

Examples Of Allegory In Beowulf
The Allegory of the Dragon in Beowulf
In the Book of the Apocalypse, Rome is represented by several allegories: the beast of the land, the beast from the sea, the harlot, Babylon, and the
dragon. The Beowulf–poet also manipulates the dragon allegory to represent Rome, but his dragon represents not Rome, pure and simple, but a hostile
area of the (former) Roman empire, the Romanized Britain or the Roman–British .
There is increasing consensus among critics––against Tolkien's views––that the dragon is "a different sort of creature from the Grendel tribe" (Gang 6)
and that among the innumerable dragon stories "there is probably not one which we can declare to be really identical with that of Beowulf" (Chambers
97). Of course, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, there are several reasons for Beowulf's taking up of arms against the dragon: defense of the country, vengeance, and punishment: "With his
live coals the fiery dragon had utterly destroyed all the coastline and nation's impregnable fortress, the stronghold of that region; the warlike king, the
prince of the Wederas, planned to take revenge on him for this" (2333–36).
Though the dragon is in many ways different from Grendel, he is in some ways very much like Grendel: he too hates the Geats and humbles them
(2318–19); he, too, harms the Geats and even destroys the royal hall of Beowulf (2325–26), while Grendel is not allowed to approach Hrothgar's
gifstol (168–169). The dragon, like Grendel (166–167), is also a ruler of the land only during dark nights (2210–11). Both have "heathen" associations:
Grendel is heathen (852, 986); the dragon, though not called "heathen" specifically by the poet, guards, however, the treasure of the heathen (2276–77,
2216).[17]
The poet indicates the quasi–indigenous character of the dragon by saying that he has guarded the treasure for some three hundred years (2278–79); in
other words, he is not merely a foreign force like Grendel–Rome nor an intruder like the thief from the Germanic kingdom (2214–25). By limiting the
dragon's presence on the British soil to three hundred years, the poet seems to suggest that the British themselves came from elsewhere as the
Anglo–Saxons

Should Voting Be Made Compulsory in Britain?
Politics & Economics
Should voting be made compulsory in Britain?
Britain currently employs a voluntary voting system, whereby it is entirely up to the individual to choose whether to vote or not. 32 countries across
the world, such as; Australia, Switzerland and Belgium, employ a compulsory voting system, were the citizens of their countries must register their vote
in elections. This paper is going to look into the positive, negative, opportunity and threat aspects of whether voting should be made compulsory in
Britain.
One of the main arguments for Britain adopting a compulsory voting system is to facilitate higher rates of electoral participation after poor turnouts in
the last two general elections, were only 59.4% and 61.4% of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From this perspective it is therefore not an infringement on the democratic rights of the public to have compulsory voting, merely an adaptation of the
legislation that currently exists.
There is a school of thought that those who are distanced and disillusioned by the political process, could be reconnected and engaged in a
democratic government if compulsory voting were to be implemented. The silent majority would be forced to consider and at least find out about
what they are voting for if they had to vote. This would be achieved by the main parties, who currently disregard the people who don't vote in
certain demographics, being forced to concentrate efforts on them as well as on the В‘core vote' i.e. those who regularly vote and pay credence to
the voting system. The effect of politicians going out actively pursuing votes in famously low turnout areas would help to ignite interest in politics,
to what was once a forgotten constituency. Also once the public are voting and more aware of the political process, it can increase more political
activity in other areas. This would also serve to address the decline of the proportion of voters strongly identifying with either Labour or Conservative
parties, which has fallen from 38% in 1964 to below 20% by 1997.
There is also a fear that the younger generation are under–represented. Statistics show in the 2005 election

The Battle of Britain Essay
The Battle of Britain
As the cold hand of death swept over the remnants of France, British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, orated on the imminent battle that would rage
over his homeland and the foreboding struggle for survival that was now facing Britain:
The Battle of France is over. I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to begin... The whole fury and might of the enemy must very soon be turned
on us. Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the
world may move forward into broad sunlit uplands. But if we fail, the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and
cared for, will sink into the abyss ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States of America, though sympathetic to Britain, was still neutral, and did not believe that the British nation could survive for long. At the
headquarters of the British War Cabinet, Winston Churchill gazed at the map of Europe, and what he saw would have chilled the heart of a man with
less courage and patriotism than he possessed. To the north and west of Britain was open sea. To the northeast, east and south, the whole of the
European coastline – Norway, Denmark, Holland, Belgium and France – was in German hands. (Hough 11–12).
To Britain, the outlook of the imminent siege of its homeland appeared hopeless. With the enemy surrounding the last stronghold of the Allies, the odds
against Britain were extremely in the favor of the opposition:
"Britain not only faced an enemy ten times as powerful as she was on land and more than twice as powerful in the air. Invasion appeared imminent and
inevitable. On July 16, Adolf Hitler issued a directive 'As England despite her hopeless military situation, still shows no sign of willingness to come to
terms, I have decided to prepare, and if necessary carry, a landing operation against her. The aim of this operation is to eliminate the English
motherland as a base from which war against Germany can be continued...' (Hough 13).
Like the mouth of a leviathan opening to consume a lone minnow on the open sea, the German forces faced an enemy that was

Purpose of the Declaration of Independence
Rights of the People
A democracy is a system of government controlled by the people, not by one certain group or individual. In the Declaration of Independence it states
that "all men are created equal," an idea which leads to the concept that all citizens should have the same rights, responsibilities, and influence in the
governing of their country. In writing the Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson was trying to break his ties with the harsh and non–democratic
rule of the British and begin a new, equal society and government for America.
Democracy is defined as "A system of government in which ultimate political authority is vested in the People." The Declaration's ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
He believed that it was time for America to break away from Britain's rule and become its own nation, which could govern itself. To do this, though, it
was necessary to write some sort of document which would state to the world the basic beliefs on which the nation's new government would be built.
This document was the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson felt that Britain was doing nothing but hurting America with unfair rules and all sorts of
ridiculous taxes. The colonies and colonists had no rights in determining the very laws which dictated the way they led their lives. The Declaration of
Independence was a formal document stating that the people of America were breaking away from Britain and that the American colonies were now
"Free and Independent States."
The Declaration of Independence was the cornerstone of American freedom and equality. By writing this document, the American Colonies could now
begin the process of starting a new way of life and a new government. Obviously, at the time the Declaration of Independence was written the concept
of "equality" was more limited than it is today. Certainly, all members of colonial America did not share equal status. However the concepts of the
Declaration of Independence have evolved more fully over the centuries

Summary Of The German Air Force: An Anatomy Of Failure By...
The Luftwaffe, known for its screaming Stukas and vicious Bf 109s, had momentous flaws that attributed directly to the down fall of the Third Reich.
Matthew Cooper, in his book The German Air Force: 1933–1945 An Anatomy of Failure recognizes the achievements the Luftwaffe met, but focuses
on its deficiencies. In the opening chapters, Cooper states his thesis, that the German Air Force lost command over Britain in 1940, lost it over the
Atlantic in 1941 and the Mediterranean in 1942, and by the middle of 1943, the Air Force could not take the initiative anywhere. His works include
several other books on the German military during World War II, such as The German Army: 1933
–1945 Its Political and Military Failure, Panzer: The
Armoured Force of the Third Reich,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A graduate of King's College, Cooper has worked at the Imperial War Museum and the Tower of London, and is an officer of the House of
Commons at the time this book was published. Overall, the book thoroughly supports its thesis. Each chapter supports this main idea in a different
way, be it preparation, leadership, resources, or overall battle plans and strategy. Moreover, the book takes a deep look at how all these facets combined
turned a formable fighting force into a shadow of its former self. One of the largest issues the Luftwaffe faced according to Cooper came from the First
World War in the form of the Treaty of Versailles. By the time the next war broke out, the Air Force was only six and a half years old, several of which
were hampered by preserving secrecy (pp1–3). This was simply not enough time to create an entire branch of the military from the ground up, even
more noticeable when compared to the other European powers. Even in

Should Britain Become A Classless Society?
Some commentators claim that Britain is becoming a classless society, one where the stamp of class leaves only a faint impression on people's
lives. Before checking whether this statement is true or not, the definition of "class" should be fathomed first. In a broad sense, social class is a
collection of similarly placed individuals from a certain social group, who not only share common interests, but also similar lifestyle and cultural
identities (Giddens, 2009: 458). Another key phrase supposed to be clear is the "faint impression", which indicates that the class system now only has
little influence on people's lives. This essay will first introduce three basic theories of social class–Functionalism, Marxism and Weberianism. After...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Indeed, some sociologists, such as Pakulski and Waters, supporting to Postmodernism, didn't believe that social class is still that important. They
thought that social mobility and changes in property ownership turned former social class now into a mixture of variety of people who have less class
consciousness, plus globalisation increases the similarities among people and makes capitalists class less competitive in the market. Those are the
reasons why industrialised society was viewed to be changed from being organised class societies to a new stage "status conventionalism", where
people are judged by their consumption patterns, lifestyle and other cultural factors. Pakulski emphasised four features of the status–conventional
societies–Culturalism, Fragmentation, Autonomisation and Resignification. Culturalism means social classes lie in lifestyles, aesthetics and information
flows. Fragmentation stresses the importance of patterns of consumption for the associations and identifications among different status groups, which
indicates that it's people's consumptions that determine who they are. Autonomisation separates individuals' independent values and behaviour from
their class background. Resignification denotes the fluidity for people's changes of their preference and recognition. Hence,

Evacuation Of Dunkirk Research Paper
Daniel Hoffman
January 15, 2018 Victory in Defeat:
The Evacuation of Dunkirk Although many soldiers were killed or wounded and almost all of the heavy equipment was abandoned and left behind
during the Battle of Dunkirk in Dunkirk, France, the evacuation of Dunkirk was immediately celebrated by Allied forces as one of the great victories
of World War II. NaziGermany began the War on September 1, 1939, by invading Poland. Having pledged military support to Poland, Great Britain
and France declared war on Germany on September 3, 1939. After Poland surrendered on September 27, 1939 there was a relative lull in the fighting.
This ended on April 9, 1940, when Germany, using" blitzkrieg" (lightning war), rolled through Norway and Denmark.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With their back's against the wall, the enemy closing in, and hope disappearing, the Allies staged a sea evacuation, codenamed "Operation Dynamo,"
that called upon British civilians to donate ships of all sizes to move men and equipment from the beaches of Dunkirk. Although new British Prime
Minister Churchill believed only 45,000 troops could be saved, 338,000 soldiers "miracuously" returned safely to British shores. This proved a
pivotal moment in World War II. If Operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, the loss of thousands of trained soldiers may have prevented Britain from
defending itself against an inevitable German invasion and may have pressured Britain to surrender. Since the United States and the Soviet Union had
not yet joined the War against Germany, the only army then capable of fighting Hitler was the British army. During the early stages of the
Revolutionary War, General George Washington led an evacuation similar to Dunkirk. Between August 27 and August 30, 1776, retreating from
advancing British forces in Brooklyn, the American Army ferried 9,000 trapped soldiers across the East River under a heavy fog. These soldiers
would also prove indispensable in future battles. Although these operations were dangerous and unlikely to succeed, the evacuations took on heroic
natures and, instead of ending the wars, helped rally the rescued forces to victories that would reshape the world.

Patrick Henry: Freedom Is Never More Than One Generation
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for,
protected, and handed on for them to do the same." Ronald Reagan said this quote, and he meant that freedom was never free, we earned it through
hard work, and must continue to work hard throughout each generation. Patrick Henry uses his knowledge to create a statement that pertains to
almost everyone's thoughts and feelings about war. Henry does this by using rhetorical devices, and repeating himself to make it clear, and is firm
about what he's saying. First, Patrick Henry gets intact with the reader's feelings, and his thoughts about war. He says "But different men often see
the same subject in different lights," this helps him to educate the audience that their opinion will almost always differ from someone else's, but you
shouldn't judge their beliefs, or purposely disrespect it. Secondly, Henry says "I shall speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve." Henry
is saying that he's going to speak his thoughts, and not put a filter on himself, because he believes the topic of war is so important to him, and the
people around him. Lastly, Patrick says "They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other." Henry is asking why are they sending an army after
us if they want to reconcile... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He also uses rhetorical devices, such as; rhetorical questions, and parallelism. He uses these to make his speech professional, and more persuasive. He
then used repetition to make his points clearer, and more enforced. He ties all these together, and creates a speech that appeals to everyone, and reveals
his thoughts on how we should handle the conflict with Great Britain. Henry does this in a mature, and polite matter to get his point across without
offending

Essay on The Impact of Refugees on a Society
The Impact of Refugees on a Society
The argument that refugees have a negative effect on society has been a topic of great debate for many years, both in the UK and across many other
countries. Almost since time began, the human race has had problems when the situation in their area has changed for the worse, and they have had to
make tough decisions about where they should go next, and the problem has never been a more prominent issue than in today's society. It is an
argument with two clearly defined sides. On one hand, the refugees, tortured, poverty–stricken and living in fear day and night. On the other hand, the
general public, worried about the cost of looking after the asylum seekers, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of the asylum applications in the last three months have not come from Europe, but from Africa and Asia. Statistics show that applications from
the rest of the EU fell by 14% compared to the previous three months. Top nationalities for asylum applications were nations where politics and
poverty have forced people to move out, such as Iran, Zimbabwe and Iraq. Every year, tens and thousands of these refugees pour into Britain, seeking
aid and support, but should they leave their country? Is the situation in their country really bad enough to make them have the right to move here?
The main opposition to refugees coming to the UK is not the Tories or any Government party, but the British taxpayer. Almost weekly, a new story hits
the headlines detailing more statistics to make their readers grimace, usually about the cost that each family has to pay to house asylum seekers, as
proved in the article "Refugees cost us ВЈ13 each" (Michael Lea, The Sun, March 2000), where phrases such as "Shocking", "Chaos" and
"staggering" are deliberately used to turn the reader against refugees. Some believe that people such as Lea use all of this emotive language simply to
help sell papers – by printing headlines that do not shock the reader, the papers won't sell, so are the views printed in the

The Colonists Should Be Separate From Great Britain

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Watson

More from Jennifer Watson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Colonists Should Be Separate From Great Britain