The Cyclical Nature of Conflict in Ukraine

The Cyclical Nature Of The Conflict Of Ukraine
The Cyclical Nature of the Conflict in Ukraine With increased globalization and various other
factors of modern society, imperialistic behaviors exhibited by world powers have become
incredibly uncommon. Most nations now stand independent, and establishing alliances and trade
deals is far preferable to overtaking smaller, weaker nations. That being said, a rare and fairly
prominent case of imperialism is taking place in the Russia/Ukraine dispute of the past year. Ukraine
has struggled with corruption in their government, and a weakened economy since the fall of the
USSR, and have only fairly recently made effective attempts to right themselves. They now hold the
goal of westernization and becoming an EU state, but are being hindered by the separatist movement
and the threat of violence from Russia that plagues their western front, as well as persistent issues
with their government and economy. Many attempts at peace have been made, but none thus far
have seen any relative success. Despite mediatory councils and the underlying threat of war, Ukraine
and Russia now stand exactly where they did this time last year, further proving that this will not be
an easy dispute to settle.
Early last year, riots and protests broke out across Ukraine, calling for a complete government
overhaul due to the rampant corruption and ineffectiveness of their politicians. To many citizens'
surprise, it was successful, and all corrupt politicians were either removed from office or arrested in
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Why Stalin Built The Iron Curtain Essays
Why Stalin Built The Iron Curtain
The Iron Curtain was the term used in the West to refer to the boundary line, which divided Europe
into to separate areas of political influence. This was set up from the end of World War Two until the
end of the Cold War. During this period, Eastern Europe was under control and influence of the
Soviet Union (USSR,) where as Western Europe enjoyed freedom. It was a border set up by Joseph
Stalin, the ruler of the USSR in the years after the Second World War. The term the "Iron Curtain,"
was first introduced in Winston Churchill's long speech, "an Iron curtain has descended across the
continent," on March 5th, 1946. Churchill's speech triggered Stalin to tighten ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Roosevelt and Stalin had got on well but at Potsdam the new USA leader, President Harry Truman
had adopted a policy of "get tough" on Stalin and Russia. Disagreements had taken place over a
range of issues. The USSR did not keep its promise about holding free elections in Eastern Europe.
The USA also dropped the atom bomb on Japan without consulting the USSR. Stalin was very
irritated that Truman did not tell the USSR about the atomic bomb until the last minute. This created
a belief in the USSR that the bombs had been dropped as a warning to the Russians.
In 1946, Britain and the USA agreed to unite their zones in Germany for economic purposes. But
this idea was not taken well in the USSR. Not only were the Western allies acting without the
agreement of the Soviet Union, but also they were planning to rebuild Germany, when Stalin wanted
to keep it as weak as possible.
Stalin built the Iron Curtain; it was a thousand mile fence cutting off the communist countries of
Eastern Europe from the non–communist West. The most famous example of the Iron Curtain was
the Berlin Wall. However that was not built until 1961. The Iron Curtain became the most important
symbol in the Cold War. Between 945 and 1948, all the countries behind the Iron Curtain were
brought under Soviet control

Three Causes Of The Cold War
The three nations that wanted a "fight" were the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union.
All three countries were just about who has the more power and who will attack first. These two
conflicts are what created the tension between the countries. The issue had begun after April 12,
1945 when Franklin Roosevelt died, and Harry Truman took his place for President. Vyascheslav M.
Molotov, the Russian foreign minister, came to visit Truman, the new President, to pay his respects
for him. Truman went to him upfront and told him off about the way Russians were acting in
Poland. This surprised Molotov, since he had never been talked to that way by anyone. Once again,
Truman responded back telling Molotov that he should do the things he

The Eastern Front: A Logistical Nightmare
After annihilating the French Army in the West and bombing Britain daily with almost no attacking
retaliation, Adolf Hitler's quest for power was beginning to see light at the end of the tunnel. But
there was one opponent left that could beat Nazi Germany, the USSR. Hitler initially signed a treaty
of peace with Russia, but Hitler never wanted it to stay. The Slavic people were nearly as
"nonhuman" in Hitler's eyes as Jews. And so, Hitler ordered for the invasion of the USSR. The plans
leading up to the invasion of Russia however, were flawed in a huge way. The German planners
were blinded by their success against France and the stereotypes that they created against the
Russian people. Hitler was even quoted saying, "If you kick the door down, ... Show more content
If captured, the struggling War Machine of Germany would get the help it needed and Germany
would finally stand equal with Russia. After making gains in South Russia, the Germans were
closing on the city of Stalingrad. Stalingrad served as an important supply route to support the
USSR's war effort in the South but the psychological importance of the battle was huge. The city,
named after Joseph Stalin (can't believe you didn't realize that), was ordered to be defended at all
costs. ALL COSTS. When the Germans were closing in on the city, Stalin ordered the evacuation of
all food in the city, not it's people. Not one civilian was allowed to leave. His reason? To inspire
Russian soldiers to defend the city, who by the way were ordered to not retreat in the now famous
order that Russian soldiers wouldn't take a step back. The battle began on July 17, 1942 when 1,000
tons of bombs were dropped over the city in less than 48 hours. This was more than what London
experienced during the whole climax of the Blitz. During the beginning of the battle, more than
400,000 civilians were trapped inside the city, about twice the size of Des Moines, By January,
1943, only 10 to 60 thousand civilians were still alive. Germany struck with everything they had,
331,000 of their finest infantry versus about 1,000,000

Joseph Stalin And The Cold War
About Joseph Stalin:
Born in December 21, 1879 Joseph Stalin the dictator of the Soviet Union of Socialist Republics,
grew up in Gori, Russia to become the ruler of the Soviet Union and the leader of the world's
communism for around 30 years. Stalin was known for his crude and cruel ways. He was known to
kill anyone who threatened power. His pitilessness was astonishing and his casualties ended the
lives of several millions of Soviet individuals. Not to mention, he also drove a worldwide battle to
"socialize" the world, which brought about the deaths of many millions around the world. He was
the leader of the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics (USSR) after Vladimir Lenin who died in
1924. Stalin led the Soviet Union until he passed in 1953. The USSR founded in December 30 1922
and dissolved in 1991. Until 1989 the Communist party secretly ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Soviet Union won control of Eastern Europe. It controlled half of Germany and half of
Germany's capital, Berlin. Following World War II. The United States, Britain, and France
controlled western Germany and West Berlin. In June 1948, the Soviet Union blocked roads and
railroads that led to West Berlin. Stalin was slowly taking over Eastern Europe and America and
Russia had different Aims for Germany.
Joseph Stalin was and still is considered to have played a major role in the cold war; some people
even would go as far as to say that he was the one to start the war. Whilst under Stalin's commands
he soon started to control a peasant society. Stalin ruled by spreading terror and with a strict grip in
order to eliminate anyone who might dare to face him. Millions of farmers refused to cooperate with
Stalin's orders and were shot or exiled as punishment. Stalin's started to show interest in taking over
Eastern Europe. Which was the first step into the Cold War but it wasn't a big step. There has been
tension between the US and the

The Battle Of Stalingrad : Turning Point Of The Second...
The Battle of Stalingrad is considered the turning point of the Second World War as the German
forces failed to overcome the defense of the Russian army leading to their humiliating defeat at the
hands of the Russians. It is commonly believed that this loss was due to Hitler's lack of trust in his
own generals and his selfish desire to conquer an essentially useless piece of land. American writer
Edwin Palmer Hoyt believes that if Hitler had granted his generals more flexibility, then Von Paulus
could have saved some of his divisions from complete annihilation. Another perspective of the
outcome is that it stemmed from Stalin's decision to allow for how own generals and commanders to
take control over the battle while he put his focus on other things which would lead to the Soviet
domination over the German army in a seemingly hopeless situation. In the first stages of the
Russian counter attack against the German army, led by General Friedrich Paulus, the German plan
for strategic retreat was stopped by Hitler himself who, in a radio message to Paulus, would say that
surrender is not an option and to continue fighting until the German's were unable to continue. This
evidently selfish and stubborn behavior from the leader of Nazi Germany forced the German army
to brave the Russian winter and later force their surrender in 1943 by restricting the power of his
generals on the front lines. The loss of manpower from this defeat would start the downfall of the
power of Nazi

The Cold War as the Result of Fear of Soviet Expansion...
The Cold War as the Result of Fear of Soviet Expansion
At the end of the Second World War only two out of the all the great powers were left standing.
Germany and Japan had been crushed in the war and Britain and France were weakened
economically and politically. The United States, who had not seen much fighting on her shores,
emerged from the war economically and politically intact as a great nuclear power and Russia,
although weakened economically, had the largest and strongest army in the world and an Empire in
Eastern Europe. The balance of world power had changed and as the Great Alliance between Russia,
Britain and America broke down tensions between Russia and America grew until they ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By the time of the Yalta Conference in February 1945, the Red Army had swept into Rumania,
Hungary and Bulgaria conquering the Balkans and moving into western Poland and Czechoslovakia.
Stalin, who had been clear about his territorial requests from the beginning of the war, now occupied
territory that had belonged to the pre–communist Tsarist Russian Empire. Stalin had begun to assert
his control over Eastern Europe. Russia's influence in Poland was a major cause of concern for
Britain and America. Lukacs points out: "It was because of Poland that World War two began and
because of Poland that the Yalta conference was called."[2] Neither Britain nor America wished to
see the fascist domination of Poland replaced with Soviet domination. However given Russia's
position in Eastern Europe and the fact that her assistance was needed to win the war, both
Roosevelt and Churchill knew that they would have to make some territorial concessions. Stalin left
Yalta convinced that his influence in Eastern Europe had been acknowledged. Roosevelt's main
concern was that Stalin should not appear to be violating the Atlantic Charter in Eastern Europe but
rather be seen to be adhering to the principles of self–determination. Gaddis argues that Roosevelt
failed to properly communicate the need to accede territory to Russia in Eastern Europe to the
American

The Battle of Stalingrad Essay
The Battle of Stalingrad The battle of Stalingrad may have very well been the most important battle
over the course of World War II. Not necessarily remembered for its course of fighting, the battle is
more known for its outcome. Not only did the battle turn out to be a major turning point in the war,
it may have saved most of Eastern Europe from incomparable destruction. The battle included two
of the biggest political and military icons of their time, Stalin and Hitler. World War II was seen
around the globe as a war to end all wars. Combat like this had never been experienced before and it
was the largest scale battle in recent history. The death tolls for all sides skyrocketed to heights that
had never been reached in any battle ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hitler began to see his dream fading away. He realized that to maintain hope, he and his army must
remain on the offensive, so he decided to go after his most glaring defeat, which was Russia. Hitler
knew that if he could capture the city of Stalingrad and continue south to the Caucasus, the supplies
would be unlimited and he would gain control of many valuable oil wells. This new plan was named
Operation Blue and it entailed many things that had to go right for the German army in order for it
to be a successful mission. The geography in Western Russia was set to play a big part in Operation
Blue. Two German brigades were to be sent south of Stalingrad and into the Caucasus to seize the
main Russian oil supplies. The two brigades would then surround Stalingrad and capture the city.
Stalingrad, located right on the banks of the Volga river, would be the key city in cutting the river off
from the rest of Russia. The Volga River was the lifeline to many other important Russian cities and
if the Germans were able to control it, then the entire Eastern front would be theirs. Along with the
Germans, their Axis allies of Hungary, Italy, and Romania would join the brigades on their flanks
during their march to Stalingrad. From the beginning the plan appeared to be going well for the
Germans. The Germans marched through the Russian lines with more resistance than during
Operation Barbarossa, but the

Soviets diplomatic pressure, its military power and...
Soviets diplomatic pressure, its military power and political infiltration, are one of the factors that
helped establish communism in Eastern Europe after 1945. Right after the fall of Nazi Germany,
Europe was still recovering through the shocks of Nazism and fascism, and communism was seen as
the right safeguard against the possibility of revival of fascism in the future. The Eastern Europe had
a bad reputation with stable democratic governments, and the economic and political situation in the
after–war years were fertile grounds for the Communist leaders.
Countries like Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania were in extreme financial crisis and communist
policies would have been attractive to them and help their countries rise from depression; ... Show
Almost all of the government regimes in these countries were controlled by communist leaders
working remotely from Russia: communication gap between these leaders and the governments of
such countries grew wider and wider. The communication gap caused lack of supervision and
administration, which resulted in governments not distributing the products and goods to the people
fairly. Cold war also proved to be one of the reasons USSR failed to maintain a communist regime
in these Eastern European states; they were focused more on competing with USA than looking after
the general population. Timely distribution of goods was severely held back by corruption and
mismanagement. Most of the general population felt the provisions they were handed were fair and
satisfactory, while many others felt completely opposite, and felt that they didn't have enough means
to survive after all the hard work and effort that had put in. Communism was merely just an illusion
of Joseph Stalin to take over these countries and support his own agenda. While most of the local
population suffered, many government officials from communist parties became richer and richer.
The imbalance was quiet visible to the general public which now wanted free market society. When
demands weren't met, it caused an outrage and civil uprising among the citizens. As a result one
country after another freed itself from the clutches of communism and

Nikolai Litvin's 800 Days On The Eastern Front
Nikolai Litvin recalls his experiences from his tenure as a Red Army soldier in his memoir 800 Days
on the Eastern Front. Litvin transcribed his memories of the war seventeen years after he left the
military, which provided him ample time to process his experiences and formulate complete
thoughts on what happened. Using a concise writing style, Litvin packs his memoir with vivid
details of military operations and offers subtle details about Stalinist thinking and Soviet life. The
memoir contains some significant Soviet bias, and Litvin's point of view is clearly impacted by the
unique experiences of a Red Army soldier. To truly understand 800 Days on the Eastern Front, the
reader must decipher how Litvin understands his experiences, the impacts of internalized Stalinist
thoughts and how Litvin reflects them, and how Litvin reveals the truths he believes about the war.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Litvin recounts violent and brutal scenes with a calmness that can only be obtained following years
of separation from the event. Specifically, Litvin states, "We opened fire on the Germans, not
permitting them to turn in our direction. The Germans were packed so tightly together, and in such a
mass, that it was simply impossible to miss." The brutal scene of Germans being mowed down by
Russian gunfire being recounted so dryly and emotion free can only be done by someone who is
completely accepting of what happened. The seventeen–year gap between when the events occurred,
and when they were penned allowed Litvin to fully interpret and accept the occurrences he
witnessed. Clearly, Litvin has become comfortable with his actions and sees them as a sort of
necessary evil. The acceptance of the events, and the ability to confidently describe them displays
the mind of someone who is content with what they've

Assess the View That the Disagreements About the Second...
18.1) Assess the view that the disagreements about the Second Front were the most significant cause
of tension between Russian and the West between 1941 and 1945.
There were two main causes of tension between Russia and the West from 1941 and 1945. One
cause, according to historians was the disagreements over a Second Front being opened. Tensions
arose due to the West's perceived delay in opening a front, the front being used as a political tool by
Stalin and the perceived lack of supplies and materials being sent to the soviets as aid. A more
significant cause of tension, however, is believed by some to be Stalin's attempts to create a sphere
of influence in Eastern Europe and his actions in Poland.
Kolko argues that the West ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They sent 409,500 vehicles, 43% of all soviet tyres, 56% of rails and 1900 locomotives and 58% of
high octane fuel and 200 fighter planes, 4 million pairs of boots as well as large quantities of rubber,
tin and cloth, respectively. This supports the scheme was a 'sacrifice' as some of the supplies sent to
the USSR negatively impacted Britain's supplies. Some including Stalin and the USSR criticised the
level of assistance given. Overy argues against criticisms of the supplies by showing that the post–
war soviet viewpoint that assistance 'could have no decisive influence' and concludes that without
the aid, the Russian economy would have been 'severely hampered'. This seems to dismiss claims
that the West had neglected Russia's needs. He argues that even though western aid accounted for
only '4% of soviet weapons' the impact was far greater as 'food, raw materials, machinery and
industrial equipment' were donated. Both Gilbert and Overy are British historians who would have
been biased in favour of the wests position and may have been sceptical of Russia's claims as both
historians were raised during the cold war. But when looking at the views in the official 'soviet
history' of World War Two, the publication's context should be considered: the Russians had a vested
interest in misrepresenting events due to their post–war situation. After the Second World War the
Cold War arose and the USSR were keen to distance

Essay On Stalingrad
The battle between Russia and Germany in the summer of 1941 is known as the largest land theatre
of war in history. It was the most horrific war of all time. Stalingrad was called Tsaritsyn until 1925,
it was then renamed Stalingrad in honor of Josef Stalin. The cities name was changed again in 1961
to Volgograd, meaning Volga City. This monumental battle is considered a turning point in the war
on the Eastern Front. The invading Gerans saw the conquering of Stalingrad as essential to their
campaign in Russia, because from this strategic point on the Volga River they could launch further
assaults in the Caucasus. The Russians were determined to defend the city in any way as an
important industrial and transportation center. Stalingrad stretched ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Army Group South under Field Marshal Fedor von Bock would undertake the offensive. On June
28, 1942, operations began with significant German victories, But Germany lost the war because
Hitler was stubborn and made poor decisions, was not prepared for the war, and had bad timing.
Hitler was stubborn and made poor decisions and assumption. Stalingrad, located in Southwest
Russia on the Volga River was a major industrial city and a communication center for the Soviet
Union, and was also named after the Soviet leader Josef Stalin. This made the city important to
Stalin and also important to Hitler because he hated Stalin. The turning point of the battle came with
a huge Soviet counteroffensive (code–named Operation Uranus) which was planned by Generals
Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov, Nikolay Nikolayevich Voronov, and Aleksandr Mikhailovich
Vasilevsky. It was launched in two spearheads, about 50 miles north and south of the German salient
with Stalingrad at the tip. The counteroffensive surprised the Germans, because they thought the
Soviets were incapable of carrying out such an attack. The operation was a "deep

Avoiding War: A Pact Between Germany and Russia during...
At the time that the pact was signed, it was in both Germany's and the USSR's interest not to get
involved in a war with one another. For Germany with its plans of European domination, a war on
the Eastern (USSR) and Western fronts at the same time would break the effectiveness of the
German Wehrmacht, whilst for the USSR war was not feasible because of the state of
unpreparedness that both the Russian economy and military was in after the purges. In Russia's case,
the pact was even more attractive seeing that it gained territorial expansion as well, because of the
secret clause that was included in the pact. On top of this its economy gained by trade agreements
that they entered into with Germany. The pact was not seen as a symbol of an ... Show more content
The question was just when this was going to happen. In Stalin's mind the non–aggression pact was
the best way at the time to postpone the war with Germany until such a time that Russia was better
equipped to handle it.
Firstly he was not ready at the time for war, and an agreement with Britain and France would mean
the probable defeat of Germany at war, but at the possibility that Britain and France might leave
Russia to fight Germany with little help from themselves (as their negotiations suggested), which
Russia could not face in their current state of unpreparedness for war. The fact that Stalin was
reasonably assured that Hitler was going to attack the west first (Hitler was definitely not going to
want to fight a war on two fronts, if he was going to attack Poland, which he was definitely going to
do at the time, Britain and France would have to come to Poland's aid (they had treaties with
Poland) if Russia was not going to aid Poland. Hitler having Russia's promise not to attack him,
would therefore have his hands free to deal with the west.), combined with the fact that he also
gained territory and much needed trade agreements through the pact, made the non–aggression pact
much more attractive than the alliance. He would therefore have time for as long as it takes

Eastern Front T-34 Essay
"T–34's Role in the Eastern Front: How the most versatile tank in WWII defeated the Nazis in
Operation Barbarossa"
Shubir Shaikh
For: Dr. Aaron Plamondon
History 485
August 8th, 2015
During the 1930's, the Soviet Union was a massive country that stretched from Asia pacific to edge
of Europe. The country's land bordered stretched for 12,000 miles, which was not defensively ready
to protect her borders. Tanks were the perfect weapon for Soviet Union because of the wide open
spaces and vast distances between cities. One of Soviet's war theorists named Mikhail
Tukhachevsky, who had extensive knowledge about tanks messaged to Kremlin during the inter–war
period, that the Kremlin needs to invest in 40,000 aircraft and 50,000 tanks the Kremlin wanted a
chance at defending her borders. T–34 medium tank was a major, technological advancement that
shaped the Eastern Front politically. The T–34 drastically shifted the war on the Eastern Front, it
shocked the invading German army and prevented Germany from seizing Moscow, Germany was
only roughly 20 miles away from Moscow. T–34 was designed mostly by Russian engineers, built in
Soviet and used all over the world. J. Walter Christie was an American who was a pioneer in
designing tanks. Mikhail Koshkin got a idea of fast tank from Christie's BT tanks. Koshkin used
Christie's suspension design for tanks. The American tank had to be secretly shipped to Russia; the
BT tanks were shipped as tractor trailers to bypass the

Why Fda's Launched Operation Barbarossa
Sunday June 22nd 1941 the Wehrmacht's launched operation Barbarossa; a full scale invasion of the
Soviet Union. After the success their blitzkrieg attack on France the Nazi's planned to do the same
except on a much larger scale. The high command was confident that it would be a swift and
decisive victory for them because they believed the Russian's to be primitive. The first part of the
German attack went as planned for Stalin didn't believe the German's would actually attack. The
Wehrmacht captured Leningrad, Kiev, and central Russia with little to no resistance and now had
their sights set on Moscow. However just as the officer's claimed to "see the spirals of the Kremlin"
the soviet counter offensive pushed them back with brutal Russian ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Before the war even started Hitler didn't follow any of his advisors or generals advice however they
all played out in his favour. They told him not to occupy the Rhineland because of fear of retaliation
yet when he occupied it France and Britain did nothing. Even during the invasion of France he did
not follow the advice of his generals yet everything went his way. However after the successful
invasion of France his hubris took the better of him and started to play warlord. After 1941 he made
a series of decisions against his advisors best judgment that doomed Nazi German. The two most
prominent mistakes were the unprovoked declaration of war against the U.S and invading the Soviet
Union. In 1941 Germany was clearly winning their single front war against Western Europe. France
had been defeated and Britain was kicked off mainland Europe, and to the East there was a truce
with Russia. Hitler wanted more living space for his new super breed of humans and was looking to
the East for new land for his new German Empire. While the Wehrmacht high command suggested
to focus on finishing off Britain before evading the USSR to a single front; Hitler again ignore his
advisors and went on with the attack. If he would have listened to his generals we would have never
entered Russia thus would never be placed in Stalingrad.
Hitler Not Allowing People to Retreat
Once in he was in the pitch of the battle of Stalingrad he

History Essay. Expansionism
How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the years 1945–48
owed more to soviet expansionism than to the USA's economic interests?
Many historians argue that the development of the cold war in the years 1945–48 owed more to
soviet expansionism than to the USA's economic interests. Source 7 supports this view to an extent
as it argues that the USSR 'tightened its grip over the countries of central and eastern Europe' and
how the 'western attitudes had hardened' due to this. However source 8 disagrees with source 7
completely as it suggests that there were 'important economic advantages for the USA in starting a
cold war'. Source 9 rejects the view of both sources as it acknowledges the need for Stalin's ... Show
Truman lack of experience on foreign policy is a clear indication as to why the US failed to
understand the Soviets need for security. Post revisionists would argue that the development of the
cold war to do with misunderstandings and lack of communication.
Overall i think the development of the cold war was due to the Stalin's expansionism as he was
hostile to the west and his foreign policy did suggest expansionism. The evidence to prove this
would be the Red Army controlling large areas of Eastern Europe, the Berlin blockade in 1948–49
and the takeover of Czechoslovakia in 1948. These were all seen as Stalin's motives to spread

How Majdanek Was A German Concentration Camp On The...
Majdanek was a German concentration camp in Lublin and initiated by Heinrich Himmler. Himmler
scouted Lublin and entrusted the Lublin SS and police to build a camp for twenty–five to fifty
thousand inmates, or slave labor. The size of the camp was modified a few times with the camp and
inmates being enlarged each time. On March 23rd, 1942 the general plan put into action and called
for one hundred and fifty thousand inmates and prisoners of war. Thereby Majdanek was to become
the largest camp in occupied Europe. However, economic difficulties and failures on the eastern
front prevented the full realization of these plans. The camp consisted of three sectors: the SS
segment, the administration section and the prisoner area. The prisoner's area made up of five fields
with wooden barracks as the accommodation for inmates. Because of the poor construction,
sanitation, and overcrowded population, the death rate was high. The shortage of water, food,
clothes and medicine made for even worse conditions. One of the fields was a camp for women,
which helped living conditions a little. There were intentions for a camp for the children, however,
this never happened, children were already prisoners of the camp. Prisoners came from 30 countries.
Polish citizens and Jews made up most of the population. The Soviets and Czech Republic were
dense in the camp as well. A small percentage of other nationalities made up inmates as well. In the
first period of the camp's operation most of the

Soviet Influence In Eastern Europe: A Case Study
In my opinion, on should the Western Allies have acted to oppose Sovient domination of eastern
Europe. I do not think that Western Allies could have done anything to limit soviet influence in
Eastern Europe. the situation at the end of the WWII was such that the Soviets, who had given an
invaluable contribution in the defeat of the Reich, de facto occupied all Eastern Europe and any
attempt of take those lands away from their influence would have lead inevitably to a new war,
which was not sustainable for the countries involved in the massacre just terminated and was not
even justifiable in the eyes of the populations. At that time the Soviets were regarded as allies in the
West. as for Italy, well, as italian i always find the question "why"

Dictators Or Monsters Quotes
Dictators or Monsters?
John Steinbeck once said " Power does not corrupt. Fear corrupts... perhaps the fear of a loss of
power". John Steinbeck elaborates that power itself does not corrupt, but the fear of losing power
corrupts the people into dictators, that leads people doing anything to prevent them losing power.
This quote parallels to Orwell's visions that loss of power in the form of fear, lead Napoleon to
become a ruthless dictator while possessing absolute power. Therefore, similar to power being
corrupt under the rule of Tsar Nicholas II, Adolf Hitler's and under Joseph Stalin's through the work
of Animal Farm.
Mr.Frederick and Adolf Hitler both counterpart to monsters to what they have an impact beyond
their existence. Notwithstanding,

Western Front: The Great War
When talking about the Great War, the warfare happening on the Western Front gained
overwhelmingly more attention than that on the Eastern Front. Ignorance about the Eastern Front
might result from the Central Powers' victory there or the absence of Russia from participating in
the establishment of the world order in the postwar era. Nevertheless, the Eastern Front needed to be
remembered not only because the Eastern Front made the same contribution to the overall Great War
as its counterpart, but also it revealed a significant historical event, the collapse of the Russian
Empire and the process leading to such event. As Imperial Apocalypse: the Great War and the
Destruction of the Russian Empire expressed, the Great War was a war of European ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their interrelation was overlapping rather than sequential although the whole book was written
chronologically. The 1912–13 Balkan Wars challenged the imperial rule of Russia, together with
other empires, by revealing diverse social dynamics there and Russian Empire's weakness in
controlling its peripheries. Therefore, the Empire applied violence to deal with its borderlands'
unrest and later with the social disorder in metropole. The year of 1917 but only witnessed the
culmination of state failure culminated, but also the expanded forms and scope of the social disaster.
Although the social disaster dominated the post–1917 Russian Civil War, it initiated in the pre–war
period, as the reinforcement of the state rule after the 1905 Revolution showed. Moreover,
nationalism did not play that much significant role in the process of decolonization, as many
scholars anticipated. The long history of the Russian Empire and its long–term civic relationship
with the peripheries in prewar period showed that nationalism did not dominate imperial subjects.
While the subsequent fact, the trend toward "state–strengthening" rather than the collapse of the
empire after the 1905–1907 crisis, further confirmed that decolonization was not necessarily caused
by

The Battle Of The World War II
Sam Carter L9
To What Extent was the Battle of Stalingrad a More Important Turning Point in World War II than
the Battle of Britain?
The Battle of Stalingrad was fought from the September 1942 through to early February 1943, and
took place after the Germans had reached the fringes of Leningrad and Moscow in operation
Barbarossa. Hitler's, and the German commander of the sixth army, General von Paulus' main aim
was to take and secure the oil fields of Caucasus in Russia. The oil from here would prove valuable,
as it would not only replenish the German oil stores that were running low, but also cut off a key
Soviet fuel supply. However, Hitler then made a major error, and commanded that the forces should
be split, ordering the sixth army, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Soviet army was increasing in numbers, and eventually, it is estimated that there were a million
Russian soldiers fighting for Stalingrad. On the 19th November, General Zhukov launched a huge
attack on both of the German flanks. This led to the Germans becoming trapped and surrounded by
Soviets, leaving no way out. Hitler refused to allow von Paulus to surrender, promoting him to Field
Marshall, and stressing that no German Field Marshall had ever surrendered in the past. However, it
had no effect, German supplies had run out and soldiers were gradually beginning to either starve or
freeze to death. Field Marshall von Paulus surrendered on the 2nd February 1943.
The Battle of Stalingrad was an enormously important turning point in World War II as it was a huge
German disaster. The whole of the German's sixth and supposedly best, army was lost and 91,000
were taken prisoner by the Soviets. The Germans didn't have the manpower to combat the Russian
advance, and so, retreated with not only a huge loss of soldiers, but a huge loss of equipment too.
Around 75% of the German's resources had been sent into Russia, and hardly any had returned. This
was a huge blow to Germany, who had been used to winning Battles throughout the entirety of
WWII, and was now constantly defending. On the other hand, it had provided a massive boost in
morale for Soviet Russia, driving them on to be a stronger and better army.

The Reckless Decision Of The Eastern Front
The Reckless Decision in the Eastern Front:
Study of Hitler's Fatal Blunder
Tiger Sheng
Ms. Cameron
Modern History 112
October 25, 2014
Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Germany's leader who started the World War II, had a great plan to conquer
every single corner of the world with his powerful army. He actually won a bunch of battles;
however several mistakes he made finally led him to the loss. In my opinion, Hitler made his fatal
blunder on the Operation Barbarossa, which was the invasion operation on the Soviet Union. The
Blitz was a tough loss for Germany in which they focused on killing the civilians but only motivated
their enemies; however it didn't reflect the final failure directly. The war declaration on the U.S. was
another mistake, which boosted their lost. The Operation Barbarossa was his fatal mistake, and
finally led him to his death.
First, the Blitz was a tactical mistake and loss of Nazi Germany. It was an operation of strategic
bombing on the United Kingdom during the WWII. According to the book Glencoe World History,
"At the beginning of the August of 1940, the Luftwaffe, which was the air force of Germany,
launched a major offensive, bombed on the British air and naval bases, harbors, communication
centers, and war industries." However, this bombing operation motivated the British people thus
they were going to fight back. Although they suffered a large casualty on their air force, the British
people soon developed their radar

The Statement Of The Marshall Plan, 1947
The Marshall Plan, 1947
As a result of the World War II, the economy in the European countries was affected hardly. The
British, French, German, Italy and Dutch economies were affected most of the country's revenue
was spend on the World War II. The economies weakness of the country allows the United State to
offer fund to support of preventing the expansion of communist ideology. In 1947, the United States
launched the Marshall Plan's plan to help European countries recover the economy and strengthen
democratic rule in the country. Marshall Plan was named in conjunction with the Secretary of State
George Marshall and was largely established by State Department officials, particularly William L.
Clayton and George F. Kennan. The reconstruction ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The organization consists of 16 European countries including the United States and Canada.
Through this organization, the United States spent a large amount of money to foster economic
cooperation among countries. As a result of the aid, western Europe experienced a significant
economic recovery. Economic development and prosperity enjoyed by residents led to the
inexorable growth of communism in Eastern Europe.
Council for Mutual Economic Assistance,

How Did Stalin Affect The Sovietization Of Eastern Europe
Sovietisation of Eastern Europe 1945–1968
World war two saw a grand alliance of Britain, America and Russia created in order to defeat their
common enemy, Adolf Hitler. In pursuit of this goal they attended a number of conferences to plan
their attacks and to decide on the future of post war Europe. At Teheran in 1943 Churchill voiced
concerns about the post–war situation in Eastern Europe, he was afraid that victory over the Nazis
would leave the USSR in control of Eastern Europe. To prevent this from happening he proposed
that the Anglo–American's open up a second front in the Balkans. Stalin rejected this proposal as he
knew it would thwart his plan to extend his 'sphere of influence' in Eastern Europe after the war, and
insisted the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Stalin had promised that the elections would be free and fair, they were anything but. In the
1947 election the communists won 80% of the vote and a one–party communist state was created.
The Catholic Church became the main opposition voice in Poland with Cardinal Wyszynski
imprisoned for his support of resistance groups. Despite this, the sovietisation of Poland lasted 40
years.
In Hungary the communists initially formed only a small part of a national government after the
war. In the 1945 election the communists only won 17% of the vote while the Smallholders Party
won 60%. However, under pressure from the Soviet Union the PM Tidly was forced to appoint a
communist Rákosi as his deputy and Rajk as minister of the interior, latter position meant that the
communists controlled the police and the legal system and they used this to terrorise members of the
opposition parties. In the 1947 election the communists won 24% of the vote but by merging with
the social Democrats they were able to get the Parliament to pass a new constitution in 1949.
The coalition government in Czechoslovakia lasted longer than in other eastern bloc countries. The
democratic parties held the majority in this government with Benes as president and Jan Masaryk as
Foreign Minister. However as had happened in other eastern bloc countries a communist, Gottwald,
was appointed PM and they

Comparing Joe Stalin and Adolf Hitler Essay
Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler, these two men have forever changed the history of the world. Josef
Stalin or Uncle Joe Stalin as his country knew him, was seen to the Russian people as a savior and a
heroic leader. Adolf Hitler was known as the `Father of the Final Solution', which killed nearly six
million of the sick, gypsies, Jews, homosexuals, and handicapped. Stalin and Hitler were both evil
men who gained their power by manipulating others to get what they wanted. Both men were cold
and calculating when it came to getting what they wanted. These two men had no respect for human
life and did not have a problem killing people who stood in their way. They promised the people of
their country a new world with a bright future; however, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
They felt it necessary to permanently remove any and every one who stood in path during their rise
to power. Both were blinded with imaginary thoughts and visions of their fantasy world. They were
unstoppable when it came to what they wanted. They were fueled by distorted and hateful views.
Neither of the two men thought twice about killing someone, it did not matter whether it was friend,
foe, or even family.
The two men were similar in countless ways. Both men came from poor families and did not have
father figures present for most of their lives. They both lived in fantasy worlds where everyone
knew them as the heroic leader. Hitler and Stalin were able to get what they wanted by bullying
those around them. The two men constantly spread terror, intimidation, and violence throughout
their countries. They were murderers of countless innocent people who only crime was being in
their path to the top. These men worked day and night to inflict pain and cruelty upon the citizens of
their countries.
Although Hitler and Stalin were similar in many ways, they had differences among them. Adolf
Hitler, even though he was extremely vile and cruel, ladies found him attractive. These ladies were
said to be amid his most significant benefactors giving to him money and jewelry to help his
political career. Josef Stalin was not just the opposite of a ladies man. He was left facially disfigured
by a childhood case of smallpox and had cripple left arm that was due to

The War Of World War II
"One death is a tragedy, one million is a statistic."– These words were spoken by Joseph Stalin after
the largest and bloodiest battle in human history, Stalingrad. The eastern front of World War II was
one the bloodiest single war of all time. Once the Germans invaded the USSR they did not know
they had unleashed the Soviet storm. During Russia's great patriotic war, the battles of the eastern
front led to the downfall of the German Reich. Even before the war, the Soviets and Germans had
had a lot of contact. During Spain's civil war the Soviet and German forces took sides with
republican Spain and the nationalists. Germany favored the nationalists because of their ideas being
very fascist like, and the Soviets with the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After France had been defeated on 25 of June, 1940, Hitler had moved ¾ of his army to the eastern
front to gear up for invasion, little did he know of the mistake yet to come. June 22, 1941, just
before dawn, German troops cross the border of the Soviet Union. 99 of the 190 German divisions
including, including 14 panzer divisions and 10 mechanized, 3,500,000 men, began the invasion of
the Soviet Union. The Soviets, taken by surprise, were unsuspecting the German invasion. Even
though Stalin had received reports from his spies, and the famous Lucy Spy Ring, about the
oncoming German invasion for months, but had dismissed all of them. Some of these were even on
the correct date. The Luftwaffe needed air supremacy over the largest air force in the world, so they
began by bombing Soviet airfields. The Red Air Force's numbers dropped from 15,000 aircraft to
less than 2,000 in under ten days. Then the Germans deployed their famous Panzers against outdated
obsolete tanks from the early 30's. Easily outmaneuvering and destroying the Soviet tank resistance
in the west. In the initial success Hitler thought that victory would be claimed just before 1942. The
first month saw the encirclement of hundreds of thousands Soviet soldiers and the taking of much of
the western Soviet frontier. Army group north was heading for Leningrad, the former capital of the
Russian empire and the second largest city in the Soviet Union, prior to German attack, local
insurgents

Compare And Contrast The Eastern Front And The Western Front
When most people talk about World War I, they typically only talk about the Western front. The
Eastern front was entirely different compared to the Western front but equally as ghastly.
Nonetheless, the one thing both fronts had in common was the vitality of the German army, which
was the only country that fought a two–front war, as it had to fight in the West against the Entrance
powers of France and Great Britain and in the East against the Russia. Germany had to bear the
brunt of the fighting on both fronts as Austria–Hungry proved incapable of resisting Russian
offensives without German support. The support of the Entrance and Central powers' home fronts
were essential to the war efforts and came in multiple forms such as economic assistance or social
acceptance. For instance, the West proved to be an effective adversary against the Central Powers as
the Entrance Powers' approach to economic warfare disheartened the Central Powers' armies and
helped undermined their ability to wage total war. Total war demanded total mobilization of all a
nation's resources, but what the most important resources were, differed between the two fronts. For
example, vast munitions industries had to be built to provide supplies for the stalled armies on the
Western front but in the East, providing transportation and the mobility of such transportation was
the most significant challenge. While both fronts faced their own unique challenges, overcoming
such challenges was key to military

The Grit Of The Russian 's
The Grit of the Russian's
The strength of a nation derives from the integrity of a home . Russian's have a history of unmatched
resilience, dedication, and the will to survive, even in the toughest conditions. The Battle of
Stalingrad was a decisive turning point during the second world war, and followed a path unlike any
other battle in history. The deciding factors of the war were simple mishaps within the German
Wehrmacht army, alongside straightforward and effective Soviet strategies that pulverized the Nazi's
from within, all of which was being directed by the marvelous Commanders of the 62nd Army.
The war began on September 1st, 1939 with an unjustified attack on Poland, lead by Nazi leader
Adolf Hitler . Many other battles took place all throughout the world, but the main focus of conflict
materialized in the heart of the European front, where The Battle of Stalingrad would unfold. Prior
to the start of the war, Soviet Dictator Joseph Stalin joined sides with the Nazi advance by signing
the German–Soviet pact of non–aggression with Adolf Hitler on August 23rd, 1939 where he would
push into Poland along side Hitler . As the conflict progressed, Hitler required food and supplies for
his army, however, he viewed the Soviets as a weak, powerless, and corrupt country that could serve
as a great home for his Nazi comrades. He soon began prepping for a mass Soviet invasion know as
Operation Barbarossa . It would be launched on the 22nd of June 1941, that would terminate the

A Divided Continent Case Study
A Divided Continent The European continent is an interesting case study of the divided between
Eastern and Western Europe. The divided is an older issue rooted in historical events in modern
European history. History allows understanding of what drives the divided in Europe into the
contemporary times. Eastern Europe has specific regional issues that divide it from Western Europe.
The most important are the weak governments and economics. The lack of strength in government
allowed for the rise of empires to take over the region; sadly, this leads to the ethnic division within
the regions, as people groups moved to different parts of an empire. The combination of the rule of
empire helped to strengthen the weak economics, lack political ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This was important to the idea of how to an establishment of the nation. Nationalism strove for the
ideas of a shared history, language, and culture. Nationalism was best exemplified in Western
Europe by Germany. However, with ethnically mixed groups like countries in Eastern Europe
nationalism was not possible to form the base of a nation. Rather, it leads to events like the Boasian
War in the 1990 's which witness an ethnic cleansing. The idea of ethnic cleanings roots a nation in
the belief of nationalism as the base of formation of a nation. However, nationalism did not work in
countries where ethnic diversification results from being part of an empire. Eastern Europe was
considered a weak area with problems of economics and political instability. This was most true in
the interwar period as western counties had divided along the 'lines ' they believed, and with the
powerful Germany and Russia on either side wanting the land back to their 'empire '. "They [Russia
and Germany] also capitalized on the abdication of the other Great powers and on the profound
polticodemrgraphic and socioeconomic weakness and conflicts within the area." There was a
twofold issue in Eastern Europe; the first was the weak economics and no political unity with many
divided ethnic groups. Along, with the threat of the reconquer of both eastern and western fronts.
Eastern Europe in the

Compare And Contrast Texas And Desert Cottontail
The Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) is a mammal that lives throughout the eastern parts of
Texas, according to The Mammals of Texas. The Desert Cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii) is also a
rabbit native to Texas. The Desert Cottontail lives in the uplands of Texas on the western half of the
state, says The Mammals of Texas. Of the two, the Eastern Cottontail is the most common. A close
relative of these cottontails is the New England Cottontail. The Desert Cottontail and the Eastern
Cottontail have both evolved from the New England Cottontail to survive in their environments.
Although the Desert Cottontail and the Eastern Cottontail are very similar, they also have
differences.
Both rabbits are cottontails and both look similar because ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
They stay small to be fast and avoid predators in the wild, more often. The Desert Cottontail also is
more social than the Eastern Cottontail. The Eastern Cottontail likes to be near town and farming
areas. They feed off the vegetation, and tend to travel alone to avoid being caught.
The Eastern Cottontail breeds all year long. The Desert Cottontails have no record of breeding in
January, July or October, be do breed during every other month of the year. To make up for this, the
Desert Cottontail matures into adulthood faster than the Eastern Cottontail. The Desert Cottontail
reaches adulthood in 3 months and is ready to breed sooner than the Eastern Cottontail. The Eastern
Cottontail lives three years or less and the Desert Cottontail is only known to live up to two years.
In conclusion, the Desert Cottontail and the Eastern Cottontail are more different than they seem.
They tend to be paired together because of their appearance, and if you look up pictures it is difficult
to differentiate between the two, but there are quite some differences. The fact is, that even the
slightest difference in an animal's habitat and environment will change its characteristics,
appearance, genetics, and so much

Battle of Stalingrad Essay
From July 1942 to February 1943, Soviet forces defended the city of Stalingrad from Nazi attack.
The battle began during the summer offensive of 1942, Nazi Army groups A an B had already
pushed past Stalingrad to take oil fields in south west Russia, when Hitler ordered Stalingrad be
attacked (Trueman, n.d.). "Some historians believe that Hitler ordered the taking of Stalingrad
simply because of the name of the city and Hitler's hatred of Joseph Stalin. For the same reason
Stalin ordered that the city had to be saved" (Trueman, n.d.). Stalingrad was also the center of Soviet
communications and manufacturing in the south. Since Stalingrad had such a significance to the
soviet war effort and because the Soviets could not allow the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Soviet Logistics were hampered but still functioning throughout the battle. The Soviets used the
Volga river to move supplies and personnel into and out of Stalingrad. The Soviets also had
functioning factories in Stalingrad producing tanks. Many of these tanks rolled off the assembly line
and were immediately driven to the front line, many without paint or gun sights (Beevor, 1998). The
Nazi generals had to consult with Hitler before any large decisions could be made. Messages had to
be sent back to Germany then the commanders would have to wait for a response. The Soviet
commanders on the other hand had their leader just across the river Volga. Commands were easily
passed to Soviet commanders. National leaders on both sides refused to give up Stalingrad. The
soviets refused to give up the city because they feared the blow to national morale (Trueman, n.d.).
Intelligence failures existed on both sides of the battle. Stalin ignored warnings that the Nazi
offensive would take place in the south of Russia and bolstered Moscow's defenses instead (Luther,
2004). Nazi leadership failed to notice the strategic withdrawal of Soviet forces while they advanced
toward Stalingrad. Later in the conflict Nazi leaders ignored the indicators of a troop build up
behind Soviet lines despite their allies being able to hear the sounds of the build up. The Soviets
forced the advancing Nazi's to fight in an urban

Twentieth Century Russia
GOROD KROVI
I. OPERATION BARBAROSSA
As mention in his book Mein Kampf, Hitler viewed all of Eastern Europe as "Untermenschen" (sub–
human) and assert that Aryan German need to secure more living space, by killing Russian and take
it place with purely German.
II.RELATIONS BETWEEN GERMANY AND RUSSIA DURING PRE–WAR PERIOD
After Germany join side with Japan and Italy formed the Axis Pact, they proposed Russia to join in
and no respone from Germany after Stalin stated that they didn't want German to interference with
it's influence and capture of Eastern Poland.Robert Service statedin his book "A History of
Twentieth Century Russia" that Joseph Stalin was over confident to believed that the military
strength of the Soviet Union was such that it ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On 12 Dec, Operation Winter Storm was initiated by new reinforcements of the 4th Panzer Army in
the south. The offensive operation caught the Red Army off guard and the German Army were able
to penetrate Russian's siege lines for 50km toward Stalingrad. Despite that, 6th Army was not able
to linked up due to Hitler's stupid order and poor snap decision made by Generaloberst Friedrich
von Paulus who commanded the German 6th Army, so the operation was pointless. The constant
failure made by Wehrmacht officer was paid by their own blood and a worldwide famous siege
lasted for 3 dreaded months which completely annihilated remaining Heer forces trapped inside the
City of

World War II Europe: The Eastern Front Summary
The Second World War was history's most brutal conflict ever witnessed over the course of
mankind. The conflict bred a whole sleuth of technological innovations, death and destruction, large
scale genocides, and completely reshaped the world afterwards. It set the path for a prolonged
nuclear arms race between capitalist and communist countries and had huge implications for third
world countries that are still affected by the events of the war today. Of all the fronts of the war;
whether it is the Pacific Theatre, which pitted the Allies against the fanatical and suicidal Japanese
army or Western Europe with the Allied invasion of Normandy and Operation Overlord. However,
no front of the war proved to be more costly and devastating than the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The prolonged battle lasted for months and was one of the most costliest battles of the war as it saw
brutal urban warfare and ceaseless artillery bombing which annihilated the city. The head of the
Jewish Virtual Library, Jason Levine, accounts the huge impact and aftermath the battle had claimed
that "Stalingrad was also revealing of the discipline and determination of both the German
Wehrmacht and the Soviet Red Army. The Soviets first defended Stalingrad against a fierce German
onslaught. So great were Soviet losses that at times, the life expectancy of a newly arrived soldier
was less than a day,and the life expectancy of a Soviet officer was three days... In all, the battle
resulted in an estimated total of 1.7 million to 2 million Axis and Soviet casualties"(Levine). Levine
details the battle as an unprecedented event as both sides suffered astronomically high casualties and
highlighted the brutality of the fighting as the rate of death for Soviet soldiers was a few days. To
understand the grasp of the battle; the entire four year long campaign of the American Civil War had
less casualties than the singular Battle of

1945-1940: The Battle Of Stalingrad
The Battle of Berlin, which lasted from April 16, 1945 to May 2,1945, marked the final major battle
of World War II in Europe. There was virtually no hope for the city of Berlin defenders against the
superior and dominant Red Army, but nevertheless, the city defenders put up a fierce and substantial
battle, turning it into the second most ferocious battle following the Battle of Stalingrad. The heavy
resistance was fueled with the Nazi propaganda regarding the Soviets. After the unsuccessful
Ardennes Offensive in late 1944 and early 1945, which was a last–ditch effort, the Nazis were left
with insufficient forces to defend its border against the Western Allies and the Soviet forces. Hoping
that a decisive victory would impel the Western Allies into peace negotiations and enable him to
deal with the Red Army, Hitler made a few changes and put all his reserves onto the Western front.
However, the Western Allies repulsed the German ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On February 13, the Budapest were defeated by the Soviet forces, and by the end of March, the Red
Army reached Austria. However, Western allies made no plans to capture Berlin. The U.S. General
Dwight D. Eisenhower ordered his forces to invade southern Germany to prevent the Nazis from
retreating in the Alps, and to avoid any unnecessary tension between the Western Allies and Soviet
Union. However, Stalin, the Soviet leader, did not want to take any risks so he compellingly ordered
his generals, Zhukov and Ivan Konev, to race to Berlin. According to several speculations, Stalin
desired to capture Berlin before the rest of the Allies so that the nuclear secrets could be
confidential. Notwithstanding the fact that Stalin was in a hurry to arrive in Berlin and capture the
Kaiser Wilhelm Institute where the German scientists conducted a nuclear research program,
Zhukov and Konev realized that capturing Berlin would be challenging and the Germans would
resist

Principle Of Mission Command
Timofte, 2 THE PRINCIPLES OF MISSION COMMAND APPLIED BY MARSHAL GEORGY
ZHUKOV DURING THE BATTLE OF KURSK – 1943 AVIATION CAPTAINS CAREER
COURSE FORT RUCKER, ALABAMA CLASS 13–004, TEAM 1 1st LT. SERBAN TIMOFTE
(ROU) 10 OCTOBER 2013 Defining mission command Mission command is the exercise of
authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative
within the commander's intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land
operations[footnoteRef:1]. The commander is the central figure of exercising mission command; he
must be able to blend the science of control with the art of command as to integrate the warfighting
functions in order to accomplish the mission. During the exercise of mission command, the
commander understands the problem, predicts the end–state, visualizes the nature and design of the
operation, describes time, space, resources and purpose, directs the warfighting functions and
constantly assesses the process. He must clearly understand the Higher Command's intent and
clearly transmit his orders to his subordinates. His subordinates pay essential role as mission
command system begins with people. Commanders base their mission command system on human
characteristics more than on equipment and procedures. Trained personnel are essential to an
effective mission command system[footnoteRef:2]. [1: ADP–5.0, The operation process,
Headquarters, Department of the Army , Washington,

Economic Prosperity During The Soviet Union
Economic prosperity was seen between the years of 1965 and 1985, however the division between
Eastern and Western Europe still remained. Also, the disparities in prosperity remained as well. One
of the countries that seen major political developments was the Soviet Union. The years of change
seemed rather unlikely between 1964 and 1982 as Leonid Brezhnev became the man in charge. As
his slogan was "no experimentation" he became the head of the state and the communist party in
1964. Even though he was optimistic and calm, the Brezhnev Doctrine, which stated that the Soviet
Union had the right to intervene if socialism was a threatened in another state, led to Soviet Union
troops being deployed in Czechoslovakia in 1968. The détente allowed ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Another problem for the Soviet's was that a series of droughts, heavy rains, and early frosts forced
the Soviet's to buy grains from the West, particularly the United States. Nonetheless, by the 1970s, a
ruling system that depended on patronage as a major avenue of advancement was created by the
Soviet's. Ten years later the system did not work as a declining economy led to an increase in
mortality rates, a surge in alcoholism, and a deterioration in working conditions. Within the
Communist Party there was a group of individuals who understood the real condition of the Soviet
Union. Yuri Andropov was a member of this group who understood the condition of the Soviet
Union, however with his deteriorating health, party leaders chose Gorbachev as the Party Secretary
in 1985. His appointing of Gorbachev, allowed for a new era to begin.
Another country that seen major political developments was the Eastern Europe. The attempt for the
Poles and the Hungarians to gain freedom from Soviet domination in 1956 only seen problems. As
Moscow could maintain control over its satellites in Eastern Europe by granting them leeway to
adopt domestic policies appropriate to these conditions, the Soviet leaders began to recognize this
fact. To make socialism more acceptable to their subject populations, as a result Eastern European
Communist leaders adopted reform programs. Continued

Russia And The Western Allies Analysis
Both Russia and the Western allies united during the Second World War as they shared a common
enemy. However, prior to the ending of the war it became conspicuous that the allies contrasting
values would become problematic. It can be argued that the Second Front was the predominant
dispute between the allies, as Russia became cautious of the West as a result of the delay in the
operation. Opposing to this interpretation, it can also be argued that there are more significant events
which hindered the relationships. This is as it can be seen that the alternative post war plans were of
more importance, as both allies hoped to achieve more power which became an issue due to their
contrasting beliefs. In addition, it can also be argued that it was ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
McCauly argues that this was the most significant cause of conflict between the allies, as he
recognises that 'the intractable problem of Poland weighed heavily on Roosevelt's mind' . This is as
Roosevelt was aware of what Poland meant to the Soviets in terms of security, and wanted to pro–
long good relations as the USA was wanting support in the Pacific. However, the USA was
unwilling to accept Soviet demands which were made under the Nazi–Soviet pact. Though the USA
were willing to make compromise's to keep the Soviets pleased Britain were less willing for Poland
to turn to Soviet control. This is as Britain joined the war to protect Poland, therefore wanted the
country to re–attain its freedom. However, as argued by Phillips 'Poland had been the route of the
three invasions of Russia... The Soviet Union was not prepared to see an unfriendly government' .
Starlin refused to aid the Warsaw Uprising in 1944 which highlights how crucial Starlin saw Poland
to the security of the Soviets, and made it clear that he was willing to take any measures to ensure
the attainment of the country. Due to the complexity of the situation he allies were only able to reach
an agreement through ambiguous compromises. This is as they were unable to reach a direct
conclusion, due to the complex nature. However, this argument is significantly weakened by
contrary evidence that suggests that Europe was not highly significant in the rise of tension. This is
as the Percentages agreement brought Britain and the USSR together to decide a future for Europe.
It can be seen in this agreement that arguable Churchill recognised that Russian control over Europe
was preventable. Williamson argues that the West's choice to open up the Second Front in France
rather than the Balkans, meant that the USSR would liberate Eastern Europe, which would offer the
opportunity to turn the region into being under

hitler /stalin Essay
Hitler and Stalin will probably go down in history as two of the greatest known evil leaders of the
20th Century. You might ask what could bring two men to become the menaces they were. What
kind of upbringing would cause someone to turnout the way they did?
December 21, 1879 in Georgia, Joseph Stalin is born. Around the time of Stalin's birth Georgia was
not the best place to be. They were at a miserable level of poverty, there was no industry, and they
had a 75% illiteracy rate and an increasing crime rate. Stalin was born to peasants. Both of his
parents were illiterate and were born as serfs. His father was a rough, violent drunk who beat his
wife and child, and found it hard to make a living. He ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hitler's attitudes led to his becoming a rabid German nationalist. His ancestors too were peasants,
but not serfs. Unlike Stalin, Hitler's early years were not of hardship and poverty. He was never poor
or harshly treated. His father moved up in the ranks in the service and retired with the highest rank
open to a civil servant with his education. He had a secure income and a very high social standing
and when he passed away he left his widow and children well provided for.
Hitler came to power in 1935. His basis of hatred was director towards the Jews. One reason for the
hatred towards the Jews was because his mother was sick with cancer, and it was a Jewish doctor
that could not save her. Hitler had no real friends when he came to power, and he killed all of the
ones he did have. Stalin came to power in 1924. They called him, "The man of Many Faces". The
people that really knew him as a person were terrified of him. All of Stalin's generals were in fear of
him, but stayed faithful to him. When Hitler attacked, he moved in with precision accuracy and
moved quickly through the town of village he was destroying. Stalin on the other hand took a four to
five year period of time to strike all of the villages and towns. Even in death Stalin was a killer.
Stalin was paranoid by an assassination on him. To prevent assassination, Stalin would never sleep
in the same

Operation Barbarossa Essays
OPERATION BARBAROSSA
The invasion of Russia was the largest military campaign of the Second World War. Operation
Barbarossa, as it was known, was launched on 22 June 1941 and completely took Russia by
surprise.
The widening war raging in Africa and eastern Europe were key distractions for Hitler from his
ultimate goal of attacking Russia.
Although the British army remained undefeated in the west, Hitler's goal proved an urgency for him
to begin moving on the east. Whilst planning was made throughout 1940 for the invasion of Russia,
time was favorable towards the Russians and they continued to mobilize their resources and
strengthen their defense forces.
The invasion of the Germans was a complete surprise as Russian dictator, Josef ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The German army once again succeeded here, with the Ukraine being captured along with 600 000
Russian prisoners. With this success, the push for Leningrad and Moscow began once again,
however the situation began to change with autumn rains slowing advances and winter creeping up.
It was during the Russian winter that German troops entered Leningrad and began a 3–year siege,
however the city never fell. At the same time, one army group reached the outskirts of Moscow but
by December night temperatures fell to below 50 degrees, German soldiers lacked adequate
clothing, fuel froze in the tanks, weapons jammed and the armies were struggling for supplies. It
was then that the Russian army, reinforced with troops from the Eastern front, launched a major
counter attack and drove the Germans back 150 kilometers back before they stabilized their line.
In the course of the invasion, the Russians had lost over 5 million soldiers and Germany over 1
million, but the German campaign still failed.
Though there is not one single causing factor, the Germans had underestimated the Russians who
had men to spare and were encouraged by Stalin's message of Nationalism where he called on to
defend Mother Russia against the invaders. Germany's military strategy was also flawed as there
were too many goals at once and not one principal target

The Cyclical Nature of Conflict in Ukraine

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Brown

More from Jennifer Brown (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Cyclical Nature of Conflict in Ukraine