Type theory

1,875 views

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,875
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
548
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
44
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Type theory

  1. 1. Personality Type Theory based on Theory of Psychological Type by C.Jung, 1928 Presented by Irina Mishina www.imablumm.com Adapted from Marci Segal, Creativity & Type, CPSI Conference presentation, Buffalo, NY, June 2010
  2. 2. <ul><li>Human behavior is patterned according to how we access information and make decisions. </li></ul><ul><li>C.Jung </li></ul><ul><li>(as cited by M.Segal in Creativity & Type, CPSI Conference presentation, Buffalo, NY, June 2010) </li></ul>
  3. 3. <ul><li>Human behavior is patterned according to how we access information and make decisions . </li></ul>
  4. 4. <ul><li>Human behavior is patterned according to how we access information and make decisions . </li></ul>
  5. 5. <ul><li>Human behavior is patterned according to how we access information and make decisions . </li></ul>PERCEPTION
  6. 6. <ul><li>Human behavior is patterned according to how we access information and make decisions . </li></ul>PERCEPTION
  7. 7. <ul><li>Human behavior is patterned according to how we access information and make decisions . </li></ul>PERCEPTION JUDGING
  8. 8. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>
  9. 9. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception
  10. 10. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception some people have a natural preference to accessing information cognitive process
  11. 11. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception some people have a natural preference to accessing information cognitive process judging
  12. 12. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception some people have a natural preference to accessing information cognitive process judging others prefer evaluating that information
  13. 13. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception
  14. 14. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception
  15. 15. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception sensing
  16. 16. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception sensing some people naturally pay more attention to their sensorial experience: WHAT, WHO, WHEN, WHERE
  17. 17. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception sensing some people naturally pay more attention to their sensorial experience: WHAT, WHO, WHEN, WHERE intuiting
  18. 18. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>perception sensing some people naturally pay more attention to their sensorial experience: WHAT, WHO, WHEN, WHERE intuiting others see linkages and opportunities for the FUTURE
  19. 19. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging
  20. 20. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging
  21. 21. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking
  22. 22. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking some people evaluate information according external criteria or based on understanding of its functionality
  23. 23. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking some people evaluate information according external criteria or based on understanding of its functionality feeling
  24. 24. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking some people evaluate information according external criteria or based on understanding of its functionality feeling others make evaluations based on values
  25. 25. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting
  26. 26. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert
  27. 27. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert introvert
  28. 28. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert introvert extrovert
  29. 29. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert introvert extrovert introvert
  30. 30. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert introvert extrovert introvert extrovert
  31. 31. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert introvert extrovert introvert extrovert introvert
  32. 32. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert introvert extrovert introvert extrovert introvert extrovert
  33. 33. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul>judging thinking feeling perception sensing intuiting extrovert introvert extrovert introvert extrovert introvert extrovert introvert
  34. 34. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul><ul><li>Extraverted Sensing (Se) - “EXPERIENCE” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>focus on what, who, where IS NOW, sensorial experience of the PRESENT </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Introverted Sensing (Si) - “RECALL” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>focus on what, who, where WAS BEFORE, sensorial experience of the PAST </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Extraverted iNtuiting (Ne) - “INTERPRET” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>focus on connections, patterns and potentials, interpretation of WHAT MIGHT BE: nearest future </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Introverted iNtuiting (Ni) - “FORESEE” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>looks for a deep MEANING, creates a vision of the FUTURE </li></ul></ul>Adapted from Marci Segal, Creativity & Type, CPSI Conference presentation, Buffalo, NY, June 2010
  35. 35. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPE COGNITIVE PREFERENCES </li></ul><ul><li>Extraverted Thinking (Te) - “STRUCTURE” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>gives order according to external criteria and rules </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Introverted Thinking (Ti) - “ANALYSE” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>looks for understanding of how things work </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Extraverted Feeling (Fe) - “CONNECT” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>focus on values for others, relationships with others, harmony </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Introverted Feeling (Fi) - “VALUE” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>focus on personal values </li></ul></ul>Adapted from Marci Segal, Creativity & Type, CPSI Conference presentation, Buffalo, NY, June 2010
  36. 36. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPES </li></ul><ul><ul><li>based on various combinations of personal preference for cognitive processes there are 16 personality types </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>depending on the preferences of our type we have natural inclinations for some kind of tasks, and other kind of tasks that require less preferred cognitive process may take a lot of energy from us </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>we process and understand information differently </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>BOTTOM LINE: we all operate in a very different manner, and it is normal, we all are right </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>WE ARE JUST DIFFERENT </li></ul></ul>
  37. 37. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPES </li></ul><ul><ul><li>for example, a person with the following type </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ne Ti Fe Si (conscious cog.process by order of dominance) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ni Te Fi Se (shadow processes) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>will have a natural tendency to think of all potential interpretations of a situation, potential uses of an object, will look at all possible connections and implications for the nearest future. Then this person will analyze these interpretations in order to understand them, will identify the ones with the most value for the others and will look into the way to align those discoveries with how things were done in the past. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>This is an INVENTOR type. This person will feel like a fish in the water during brainstorming, or, actually, with any kind of divergent techniques that require usual interpretations of things. This is a person who will give you 100 possible uses of a brick on a spot. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>But don’t ask this person to evaluate choices according to an objective external criteria or especially focus on the details of the current situation: these processes require a lot of energy and are not welcome. </li></ul></ul>
  38. 38. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPES </li></ul><ul><ul><li>on the other hand, a person with the following type </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Se Fi Te Ni (conscious cog.process by order of dominance) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Si Fe Ti Ne (shadow processes) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>will have a natural tendency to perceive the things how they are and will focus his/her primary attention on actually experiencing the things. Out of what there is here and now this person will pick only those experiences that align with his/her personal values. Then a clear structure and order will be given to all this information and after that the person will look for a deep meaning of the whole experience. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>This type likes variety of activities, values freedom, likes observing people and helping them, values friendship and likes doing things the best he/she can. This person even at divergent stage needs structure, order and first of all clear relevance with the present. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>And this person will simply suffer if you ask him/her to create potential options based on associations, metaphors or random connections, if they don’t see how it is relevant to their current experience . </li></ul></ul>
  39. 39. <ul><li>PERSONALITY TYPES </li></ul><ul><ul><li>more information about the personality types: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.myersbriggs.org/ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.personalitypage.com/ </li></ul></ul>

×