The Importance Of Animal Testing

The Importance Of Animal Testing
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role
in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing
on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has
kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal
testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased
over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only
cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today's advanced scientific world.
There are over a thousand ingredients that are used in cosmetics ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This may be true, but in years past, there were not as many alternatives to animal testing as there are
today.
The creation of a new product, should not cause animals to suffer and die. Because humans want a
new lip color or a new type of eyeliner, does not mean that numerous animals should be immensely
tortured and at times to death. Many argue that in order to ensure the safety of a product, animal
testing is necessary. However, in today's scientific world, this is not true. Many people argue that
animal testing is cheaper, but according to Consumers ' Research Magazine writer Beatrice Hunter,
it costs 500,000 dollars per product to test something using animals, as opposed to alternatives,
which cost on average 50 dollars per product.
One of the alternatives that is explained by FRAME.com writer is information. It is a way of
computer cataloging all of the information that is already proven or not proven safe. Making this
information available to everyone in the testing world helps to limit animal testing. If information is
looked up and can be researched easily before any test is conducted, it limits any double or triple
testing. There is no reason to test something and torture animals once it has already been proven one
way or the other.
The molecular structure of a substance can help to predict the toxicity of it. By comparing the
substance 's structure to that of more than 12,000
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Negative Effects Of Animal Testing
Animal Testing, Why it Should be Eliminated Animals have been used for scientific testing since the
ages of Aristotle and Erasistratus. Should we continue using animals as our test subjects, or is it time
for a change? Many argue over whether testing on animals is good or bad, this debate has been
continuous because it has both positive and negative affects. Animal testing has been the cause of
many scientific breakthroughs, but, these are overthrown by the negative impact that animal testing
not only has on its test subjects, but it's deceptive information and waste of resources. The
elimination of animal testing will enhance information accuracy, cut down on wasted resources, and
improve the lives and living conditions of many. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their demanding environment causes them to develop obsessive habits. These habits include of
physically hurting themselves by biting and pulling out their own fur and well as other compulsive
fixations. "The complete lack of environment enrichment and the stress of their living situation
cause some animals to develop neurotic types of behavior such as incessantly spinning in circles,
rocking back and forth, pulling out their own fur, and even biting themselves." (Voice 4 Animals)
Many think that with the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) in place, animals are protected when used in
study, and are therefore not harmed. Although, it is known that nearly ninety–five percent of animals
are not fortified by the AWA. The animals not protected include rats, mice, fish, and birds, which
make up most of the animals used in studies. According to Procon.org, "The AWA covered
1,134,693 animals used for testing in fiscal year 2010, which leaves around 25 million other animals
that are not covered. These animals are especially vulnerable to mistreatment and abuse without the
protection of the AWA." Although some experiments are managed, cruel and unjust treatment is still
authorized. According to The Telegraph, "In British Laboratories today, animals are still burned,
paralyzed, brain damaged, and given heart attacks and electric shocks." Without the AWA and strict
rules and regulations on experiments, animals are not defended against abuse and therefore have to

Medical Animal Testing
In 2014 767,622 animals were used for medical research. Without these animals to test on we would
have had to test on other human beings. Who would you rather test on, a rat, or a loved one?
Medical animal testing is needed to keep moving forward in the medical fields and to keep our
society strong. The genetic similarities between humans and the laboratory animals implement
positive results. Since we are so genetically similar to chimpanzees and mice there are no other
alternative options of testing on living organisms other than human beings. Our brains are
essentially analogous to the brains of mice and chimpanzees. (Holmes) Humans share 99% of the
same DNA as chimps and 98% of the same DNA as mice. Without the similarities found in these
animals we would not have discovered a lot of the life saving developments we have for humans
and animals today. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most people that benefit from medical animal testing don't even know they do. (Wolff) A large
number of people don't actually see how much progress we have made because of animal testing.
Penicillin was first found in the Oxford labs after being tested on 20 different mice, the cure for
Parkinson's disease which involved experiments on monkeys, and multiple other life–saving
vaccines were also developed there. Oxford scientists are now working on developing a cure for
malaria. All of the vaccines they have created that also helped save millions of lives, were tested on
animals. (Hansen) A main point animal testing protesters make is: the tests cause the animals pain
and they are inhumane. Multiple scientists would like to point out that they do their best to make
sure their tests cause the least amount of pain as possible. Most tests consist of digging, smelling,
running, and swimming. When looking inside of the animal they try to focus on x–rays, and non–
invasive tests similar to them in hopes of making it less uncomfortable for the

Animal Testing Disadvantages
Animal testing
Recently, there is an increasing number of methods, which are used to test medicine and beauty
products, are animal testing. In this case, numerous animals are tested in the experiment. However,
in laboratory tests，animal experiments still have defects that need to be solved. Additionally, the
animal testing is a defective method, but it still widely used in normal life, which is utilized to get
the result of new medicines and feedback of cosmetic products. On this basis, a number of people
have started to consider whether it is inhumane to test on animal, however other people believe this
is effective for creating new medicine to heal miscellaneous diseases. This essay will discuss some
advantages and disadvantages of the animal testing. Nevertheless, most of new medicines which are
created still need testing on animal. Research done by Garattiui and Grigusschi (2017) displayed
that when science and technology has not yet reached a certain level of advanced conditions, animal
experiments are still the main approach to find out the solution of diseases in treatments. There are
plenty of benefits about using animal testing to test new medicines and cosmetic products. The main
advantage of animal testing to test medicine is that it can carry out more experiments in shorter time.
This is because of most of growing up period animal is shorter than human. Ostergaard et al. (2010)
indicated that when using the animal experiment to design test models, it needs

The Negatives of Animal Testing
Many people may not realize that the majority of products in their own home have been tested on
animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an M&M
has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others
it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity
in recent decades.
Animal testing has been done since at least 500 BC; even Aristotle experimented on animals for
scientific reasoning. Around 200 AD, dissecting animals in public was actually used as a form of
entertainment, people would actually go and watch someone perform a vivisection on an animal.
Vivisection is when an organism is dissected while it ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is cruel and inhumane to put animals through so much agony, they can feel pain and suffering too,
just like humans; they just cannot speak to stand up for themselves.
Recently, a monkey was photographed saving a puppy from a tsunami in Japan. The image just
proved how much the monkey cared and knew what was happening, and knew that he/she had to
save the puppy and get away. Animals are smarter than most people think – they feel love, fear, and
pain. Many religious traditions say that people should care for animals, treat them with respect, and
try not to cause them harm or suffering (Ferdowsian).
Animal testing is also unreliable. Even though animal testing is responsible for many medical
breakthroughs, some of those breakthroughs could have been made without testing them on animals.
The drugs that pass animal testing and get put on the market are not always safe (Scott). There was a
drug called Vioxx that was proven to help mice and protect their heart, but when humans started
using the drug, it caused thousands of heart attacks, many resulting in death. According to Dr.
Furlong, "94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials". That is an astonishingly
high number. If the results are so inaccurate, then what is the purpose of even testing on the
animals? (Ferdowsian)
It can also be the other way around, some drugs/chemicals may work

Animal Testing On Dogs
.... Using dogs as a test subject is a big issue in the U.S . Whereas most of the dogs are "rescued"
from outside shelters. Using dogs as a test subject is a big issue in the U.S. given that how the dogs
are treated. There are many statistics showing that these dogs are abused. Also, one of the diseases
they test the dog on is the Glycogen Disease. In 2013, about 74,000 dogs were used in the labs for
research (Malisow). Dogs are used in glycogen storage disease gene therapy research. The dogs with
the disease used to be able to live for about 28 days. Now, they can live for about a year (Schweer).
FDA shows that 90% of tests on dogs fail on humans. As a result, it is a waste of testing and a waste
of dogs (Malisow). About 68% of the dogs tested are used for cosmetics and drug testing. Also,
more than 1,000 experiments are going on at any given time (Schweers) This shows that so many
dogs are being tested on in the labs and one of the worst things they test on is glycogen disease. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are many rescue teams and alternatives to testing on dogs. To do so, they can use human cells
and tissues with volunteer humans.They could also use cadavers (dead human body models) as
alternatives to dogs. Obviously, those bodies would be donated "We believe that this animal use is a
violation of the principal investigation for provided false information about alternative non–animal
technologies to justify animal use in his protocol," states Dr. John Pippin, senior medical and
research advisor to PCRM and author of complaint (Swanson). One of the biggest rescue teams for
research dogs is the Beagle Freedom Project. This program has saved over 450 research dogs in the
last 4 years. ⅓ have had their vocal cords cut (Malisow). Also, many research labs are getting rid of
using dogs in experiments like the Texas Health Institute. (Schweers) Many people are trying to stop
dog testing in labs and those were some of the

Animal Testing Pros
Nowadays, human discovers a cure for incurable diseases and we can see people who conquer an
incurable disease such as cancer or dementia. In addition, major cosmetics companies are trying to
develop effective skin treatment cosmetics for a cure to a skin disease. These kinds of experiments
are done in a laboratory with animal–testing, medical worlds and many major cosmetics are
claiming that with this kind of biological animal testing is the most effective ways to discover a cure
for terminal illnesses or a preliminary inspection for find a side effect of new cosmetics. In addition,
the world of medical insists that when doctors' experiments for a long lifespan disease, they cannot
do with long lifespan animals, and doctors doing their experiments with short lifespan animals such
as mouse. With these animals, they can easily draw a conclusion for biological responsiveness.
Despite of many negative sides, animal testing has positive sides in terms of medical and
commercial aspects. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In vitro testing is one of alternatives to animal testing; this method has generally spent much more
costly than small or medium scales of animal testing. In addition, with the current level of
technology levels, in vitro testing is too limited to test the amount of experiments. Another
alternative is research with human volunteers. This method has called "Microdosing". This method
is actual medical and scientific research with a human. However, this method is spent many times to
get results and it spent the amount of budget to the test. Since there are many problems with these
alternatives animal testing is the best way of doing biological

The Rights Of Animal Testing
A long time of debates go back and forth on the rights of all animals with further argument or
debates, do humans have the right to use animals on medical testing and lab use? There are several
issues that can be placed in this argument this research will acknowledge four important topics in
the rights of animal testing. Is it right to use animals for testing? Is it right to compare animal DNA
to human DNA in these animal experiments? Is it right to use real animals instead of computers to
generate results? Is it right to state animals are being protected and cared for while giving toxins to
make them sick? Therefore, the question needs to be asked if animals should be used for scientific
experiments in labs all across the globe. The on going attacks on the lab staff's morals, attacked on
facilities and the lack of support from the public have made medical testing on animals a significant
dilemma among the public. The two organizations that are in the middle of this argument are the
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and Americans for Medical Progress (AMP).
AMP defends that animals are biologically similar to humans and are susceptible to over 200
diseases and play a vital role in advances in medical care and treatments. Many of these successes
have created treatments, cures and vaccines that have increased health care resources for both
human and animals a like. The problem with this success comes the concern on whether or not it is

Testing On Animals : The Inhumane Effects Of Animal Testing
Over 115 million animals are trapped in steel cages everyday awaiting a latex gloved hand that is
sure to reach in and whisk them away for a new day of testing. Cosmetic animal testing involves the
burning, the maiming, the murdering, the poisoning, and the torturing of rodents, rabbits, cats, and
dogs, among others. However, some cosmetic brands have decided to put an end to animal testing
one step at a time; these makeup companies are cruelty–free. In order to receive the status of
"cruelty–free," the company cannot test ingredients on animals, cannot hire third parties to test on
animals, and cannot sell products in countries that require animal testing. Believing that no animal
deserves to endure that immense pain, these corporations understand the inhumane aspect of testing
and how the business and science aspects do not add up. Without the use of cosmetic animal testing,
cruelty–free makeup brands benefit all animals and people involved. Animal testing is an extremely
inhumane form of treatment. However, some argue that due to the inability to test on human beings,
animals provide the knowledge that cosmetic products are safe to use. Through the process of
testing on animals, any issues that develop regarding the eyes or skin can be fixed before the product
is sent to the market. With over seven thousand proven safe ingredients to choose from, why are
companies still torturing animals without need? Bunnies, guinea pigs, mice, rats, and even cats and
dogs, especially

Animal Testing Essay
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation is the process of testing new treatments and
medicines on animals. Animal test is a scientific experiment in which live animal such as mice,
hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, and baboons is used to undergo testing that is likely to cause them
pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm. Scientist use this research to determine what type of
diseases affect the human body and what can be done in order to treat these diseases. Testing on
animals is not only cruel but can be costly. This is also provides a way to current scientific
knowledge of how organisms develop and functions. Study has shown that animals have very
similar physiology to humans and therefore, it would make them the perfect candidate for scientist
to conduct tests to seek information on how the human body will react to certain substances. Animal
testing became a major asset in scientific research, drug development, health and medical research
and cosmetic manufacturing. Although, animal testing has brought many medical benefits and has
enabled scientist to find treatments for diseases such as cancer, antibiotics for infections, vaccines to
prevent some of the most deadly viruses, and surgery for injuries, it is also seen by many as an
immoral and unethical approach. Due to the cruelty and suffering on the animal during the
experimental process, while yielding very minimal results. As mention by (Author), "Two years ago,
independent studies published in PLOS

Animals for Testing
Imagine a poor, tiny mouse sitting in a cage. It is crouching down in the corner, quivering in fear. It
has been injected with medications in the process of being approved for human use. It is slowly and
painfully dying. We use animals for testing new products, like medications and beauty products that
we end up using. Why should animals be put through such pain and agony for something we need?
We are selfish and think we are the superior species, so we use animals instead of us. In my opinion,
animals should not be used for testing and researching new products. Each year, more than 100
million animals are killed during testing. Some of those animals end up dying before the experiment
is even over. Others may survive through the experiment but end up dying shortly after. Most of the
testing is a waste of time anyway. According to the Food and Drug Association (FDA), 92 out of
100 drug tests that are passed on animals end up failing in humans. If 92% of drug tests fail, what's
the use in testing on animals? It is misleading, and we end up wasting money and time. It only
prolongs the suffering of people waiting for a cure. We rely too heavily on animals for testing, that if
they drug fails, we won't even give it a chance in humans. The drug could end up proving to be
extremely helpful to humans. One example of this is the drug Lipitor. It failed during animal testing
but was later proved to be effective in humans. If we would test medications in humans first, we
wouldn't have

Human Testing : The Benefits Of Animal Testing
Do you know how products are deemed safe for human use or consumption? In the 1940s the polio
virus killed thousands of people around the world every year. In 1952 polio reached its peak in the
United States with over 21,000 fatal cases. After a vaccination was developed in the 1950s and the
1960s, polio was nearly eliminated has a public health threat. Today children get routine vaccine that
provides protection for life against the disease. Millions of people are healthy adults because of
vaccines that were made possible by animal testing (Benefits of).
Animal testing is the use of non–human animals in research projects, mostly for purposes like
determining the safety of products such as cosmetics or drugs (Animal testing). Some tests used on
animals include injecting or forcing an animal to consume potentially harmful products, exposing
animals to radiation, forcing animals to inhale toxic fumes, and exposing animals to experiences that
cause anxiety and depression. Some big brands pay to test on animals, and they include Avon,
Maybelline, Mary Kay, Victoria's Secret, and various others (Search for). Animal testing should be
banned due to it being so cruel, unethical, and unreliable.
According to Cruelty Free International, most animals that are used for experimentation are bred for
this purpose in laboratories or breeding facilities. Currently, millions of dogs, cats, mice. monkeys,
birds, and even more, are being locked in cold cages, being cruelly tested on. A

Animal Testing Is Wrong
Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in the United States from animal testing. These
animals are harmed or even killed more than half of the time that they are experimented on. These
harmless animals are taken and forced into captivity for different kinds of testing from day to day.
They are forced to stay in cages all day long and only get to eat what they are given based on testing
for that day. Animals are just like people; they need to exercise, have interactions, be able to eat
when hungry, etc., but laboratories take away these privileges from the animals by trapping them in
the lab all day. Animal testing is wrong and harmful in many ways. Animal testing is wrong because
it keeps the animals in captivity; they are constantly trapped and used for human benefits. Animal
testing is also harmful to the animals because they are sometimes hurt, or even killed due to the
experiment. It is very unlikely that the animals are unaffected by tests done in the laboratory. In
addition, animal testing is wrong and unnecessary since humans and animals are not the same. The
effects of the experiment are sometimes completely different from animals to humans; therefore,
they make poor test subjects. Many people believe that killing helpless animals is horrifying and
hurting animals is unnecessary. Everytime we use animals for animal testing there is a great chance
of death for the animals. Animal testing also hurts the animals every time the test goes wrong or
uses a

The Cruelty of Animal Testing
Animal testing is a completely unnecessary act of cruelty and should not be allowed for various
reasons. It is superfluous for innocent animals to undergo chemical testing of any sort, not only do
they suffer, but there are other more humane alternatives to test products. Many people who are in
favor of animal testing do not know of these safer more humane alternatives. Many methods have
been developed to help stop animal testing, and improve the health system of all human beings.
A significant amount of chemical testing is done on animals and is completely unnecessary. Many
companies test on animals to evaluate the efficiency of a chemical. When testing on animals they
usually check for skin or eye irritation after pouring harsh chemicals onto the shaved skin of a
delicate animal, usually a rabbit, or it is dripped into their eyes without any form of pain relief. [1]
Not only are they tested upon, but afterwards if they have not already died, they are killed by either:
asphyxiation, neck–breaking, or decapitation.
Many drug companies use animals for the "lethal dose" test; they force a defenseless animal to
swallow significant amounts of the chemical which is being tested until they determine the dose that
will cause death. [2] This type of chemical test on animals causes excruciating pain to them because
the chemicals are practically destroying their internal systems as more chemicals are being inserted
into their small bodies.
The drug efficiency test is one of the

Animal Testing
The usage of animals for developing new cosmetics and educational purposes has been going on for
years. Most importantly, over 26 million animals each year are used for medical purposes:
biomedical research and clinical research. Why is animal testing such an important factor in the
medical field? Biomedical research is 'the broad area of science that involves the investigation of the
biological process and the causes of disease through careful experimentation, observation,
laboratory work, analysis, and testing (California Biomedical Research Association)." Some
scientists believe animals are useful for the research because of the similar structured that they share
with humans. "Chimpanzees share more that 99% of DNA with humans ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, according to brainsfact.org today, there is only one established clinical treatment for
stroke, which was developed following experiments observing stroke in rabbits." Also, animals are
used to create models for traumatic brain injuries, diabetes, cancer, and Parkinson's and so forth. Yet
again, in order to create the models, animals are forced to undergo procedures: surgeries, burns,
forced feeding, unbearable pain, and isolation. Furthermore, animal testing is an important factor in
the medical field because patients are unlikely to participate in clinical research simply because they
don't like going through the trials and getting a placebo. "Forty–six percent of patients did not want
to risk going through the effort of participating in a trial and getting a placebo for their efforts, while
34 percent didn't want to feel like "guinea pigs" (

The Use Of Animal Testing : The Dangers Of Animal Testing
Animal Testing
When you think of cosmetic animal testing, what images come to mind? Do pictures of burned eyes
and irritated skin appear? Well, it should. The FDA (Food & Drug Administration) has given a claim
stating, "The FD&C Act does not specifically require the use of animals in testing cosmetics for
safety, nor does the Act subject cosmetics to FDA premarket approval" ("Product Testing – Animal
Testing & Cosmetics" 1). According to this statement by the FDA, animal testing is not mandatory,
so why do researchers continue to use it? It should be forbidden to use species of animals for
cosmetic research and inhumane cruel experiments. Running test and experiments on innocent and
voiceless animals can lead to the cause of their unnecessary deaths, have misleading research, and
end up wasting (or costing) too much money. Moreover, animal testing is a cruel and inhumane way
to torture and kill animals for mankind's own benefit. For instance, every day animals are discarded
like yesterday's trash. The Humane Society International gave an approximate outlook on animals
that are murdered by stating, "An estimated 100,000–200,000 animals are killed in cosmetic
laboratories each year" ("About Cosmetics Animal Testing" 1). Although, some will argue that it is
worth the kill to make shampoo, makeup, etc., harmless to humans; however, animals shouldn't be
used for something as non–essential as cosmetics. Animals are not meant to wear makeup, yet
products will be applied to

Animal Testing On Animals
Many americans own animals to cherish, love and fight boredom. Humans have had animals as pets
for around 10,000 years. Cats were the first animal to be domesticated by humans in the Near East.
But how would you feel if your pet was used for scientific testing? Even though dogs and cats are
not always used for testing they are shown on the "Top 10 animals used for experiments". The top
three are flies, worms, and rats followed by rabbits, other large rodents, fish, then dogs and cats.
Although animal testing is known to be cruel or inhumane it has contributed to so many of cures and
or treatments that have save thousands of lives today. Not only contributing to life–saving cures and
treatments; using a whole–body system is the only adequate alternative to testing on animals; and
since they are similar to humans in lots of ways they are appropriate research subjects. The CBRA
also knowns as the "California Biomedical Research Association" stated that most medical
breakthrough in the last one hundred years has resulted almost directly from testing on animals. This
proves that testing has contributed to life–saving cures and treatments. For example, insulin was
discovered to help save lives of diabetics by using an experiment in which dogs had their pancreases
removed. I have a couple family members with diabetes and without insulin they may not be around
today. These experiments helped my family, other families or even myself in the future. Not only
does testing animals

Animal Testing and Medical Advancement
Every day, animals such as rabbits, chimpanzees, and mice take part of medical experimentation.
"Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to
humans. The United States and Gabon are the only two countries that allow experimentation on
chimpanzees." (The Jane Goodall Institute of Canada). What people don't understand is that these
animals contribute to medical discoveries regarding human health. Animals should be used for
medical experimentation because they contribute to many cures and treatments that have saved
lives, their genetic material appears to be similar to those of humans, they are similar to human
beings in many ways, animals are the only organisms other than humans who we can experiment on,
and the animals themselves benefit from the result of animal testing.
Animals that are put forward to medical experimentation contribute to cures and treatments that
have saved many lives. The California Biomedical Research Association states that "nearly every
medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals."
(California Biomedical Research Association). Animals that are used for these tests have contributed
incredible discoveries on unimaginable areas starting on Cancer, HIV/AIDS, Heart Disease/Stroke,
Diabetes, Birth Defects, and Spinal Cord Injuries. Animal testing has made medical discoveries to
go from antibiotics to blood transfusions, from

The Ethics Of Animal Testing
Over the last couple hundred years, our world has expanded beyond its horizons and the new
equipment and advanced technology has allowed humans to succeed in many areas, but has also
damaged the basic ethics and morals in some of us. Today on television, we see the over dramatized
body spray commercials or a famous celebrity advertising their favorite shampoo and stating its
claims, but what most do not know is that a couple or couple hundred, animals were killed to
approve, by law, of that product. This act is called animal testing, which is the method or experiment
that forces an animal to go through any harm or distress (Thew). I do not agree with this practice
simply because it harms innocent animals for products that we do not need ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, here are some cosmetic companies that do not test on animals: Becca, Hourglass, Marc
Jacobs Beauty, Nars, and the list goes on and is still developing as this trend increases (Suzi).
I think this is a major step in the right direction, but there are also companies who do test on
animals, and even a country who enforces animal testing. That's right, China is the only country in
the world that requires all of their products, to be tested on animals. Even imported goods must have
been tested on animals, therefore any company who sells to China, is not cruelty free, because it is
required by the Chinese law that their products must be approved by the method of animal testing.
However, there are many countries who have banned animal testing on cosmetics, from occurring
inside of their radius, and the number has been growing. As of right now the following countries
have banned animal testing for cosmetic products; The European Union, which includes twenty–
eight states, Norway, India, and Israel with many other countries considering this step. This is a
perfect example of how economically stable they still are due to this major change, and how it has
not affected them in a negative way. Therefore, the excuse for a company to not go cruelty free
because they do not want to lose money, is just as excuse so

animal testing "Beauty without cruelty" is the outcry that can be heard from animal right activists
around the world. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the
cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There
are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals.
Anti–testing activists deem these unnecessary and consider them to be cruel. "Fourteen million
animals are used currently in the U.S. to test toxicity and irritancy of cosmetics and household
products" (Hannah). Many new forms of safety tests are being developed by companies to save
money along with the lives of innocent animals.
There are three common safety test that are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this test the chemical being tested if force fed to rats or mice in small amounts until the dosage is
in excess. This is continued until at least 50% of the test subjects die. Although the test rodent may
not die right away, it may experience seizures and internal damage. This test is considered to be the
most cruel of the tests and can only determine how much of a chemical substance is needed to kill a
small animal not a human being.
In the skin irritancy test the chemical is applied directly onto the shaved skin of a animal.
The skin is then monitored for irritation. This test is also inconclusive in the skin makeup of an
animal differs greatly from that of a human. The amount of absorption between the two different
skin types will have an influence on how the chemical will react once it comes in contact with
human skin tissue.
Many companies such as Avon, Revlon, and Estee Lauder have completely stopped the use of
animals in testing their products. Over 250 companies are also following in their footsteps and
seeking new methods to generate the same effect. One company has gone as far as performing tests
on nuns who have sympathized with those against animal testing. "None of the nuns died." "For the
first time in their lives, the nuns wore lipstick." (Penders2)
Using computer generated models is one example where researchers can predict the how the skin
will respond to the chemicals using cloned human tissue cells. The use of egg membrane

Animal Testing Benefits
The Benefits of Animal Testing Animal research is a very controversial topic. This form of testing
should be the top funding priority because of all the scientific advances that have been made. This
paper will highlight a few of the many reasons that animal testing is a very useful scientific tool.
Animal testing has improved the quality of medicine that is readily available to the general public.
The California Biomedical Research Association has reported that almost all of the medical
breakthroughs was the result of animal testing in the last 100 years (1). Experiments involving the
removal of a dog's pancreas helped with the discovery of insulin (2). Many animals are used to help
lead to more discoveries everyday. The polio vaccine was

Animal Testing: The Ethics Of Animal Experimentation
In the history of mankind, human used numerous animals to sustain their life and to keep their
species. They used animals to hunt other animals or they use them to protect themselves. Sometimes
they eat the hunting animals if they fail to hunt other animal. They also used animals to acquire
knowledge. They learned biology through dissect animals and they also learned pharmacology
through test medicines on animals. However present day, people start to ask question about ethics of
animal testing. Some groups of people say that animal testing has no problem with ethics. Most of
people in this groups does not want to think of animals as on the same level of themselves. On the
other hand, other groups of people think that because animals cannot ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To exemplify this, numerous researchers believe that "animals help in the fight against cancer" (2),
but since President Richard Nixon signed the Conquest of cancer Act in 1971, the "War on Cancer"
in the United States has become a series of losing battles. Through taxes, donations, and private
funding, americans have spent almost $200 billion on cancer research since 1971. However, more
than 500,000 Americans die of cancer every year, a 73 percent increase in the death rate since the
"war" began (2). Researchers also believe that "Animals are here for humans to use. If people have
to sacrifice 1.000 or 1000,000 animals in the hope of benefiting on child, it is worth it" (2). Unlike
this, if experimenting on one intellectually–disabled person could benefit 1,000 children, is it worth
it? Of course not! Ethics dictate that the value of each life in and of itself cannot be superseded by
its potential value to anyone else (2). Citizens need to become more frank about the cruelty and
incompetence of the research system and government have to make sure that its tax dollars and
generous donations not be used to fund experiments on

Animal Testing Unnecessary
Animal testing has a long history, with great minds such as Aristotle and Copernicus partaking in
order to further their research. Scientists have used animals for biomedical research to help further
their limited understanding of anatomy and physiology for thousands of years. It could be argued
that the use of animal testing in the past has led to the current level of understanding and medical
research that has saved many lives. However, the techniques used by Aristotle and others should
now be considered antiquated. There is technology available today that makes animal testing
unnecessary, but greed has caused major companies to continue testing on animals because it is less
expensive than investing in cruelty–free methods. Animals are also used for cosmetic testing, to find
which ingredients and makeup and cosmetics can cause irritation to consumers. Besides the fact that
there are other methods available to find harmful ingredients, testing on animals to further societies
own vanity is cruel and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Testing on animals allows researchers to see how the drug or chemical will fact the entire body at
once. A common argument used in favor is called the "Animal Model" which essentially says that
some animals have systems that are very similar to human systems. An example would be
chimpanzees whose internal systems are about ninety percent similar to humans, and pig skin is
composed of the nearly the same material as humans (Speaking of Research). However, research has
shown that this model is heavily flawed and does not universally apply to humans. One reason for
this is the genetic diversity between humans, whereas many animals are very similar alleles and are
nearly genetically identical, humans share many different versions of genes and how an individual
responds to

Animal Testing On Animals
Should we be testing on animals? This topic is important because there is a lot of debate around it.
Some people say it's cruel and inhumane, and that animals have rights too. On the other hand, there
are people who say it has a positive outcome because we have discovered new ways to cure fatal
diseases and improve our medicines. Currently, people still use animals for medical and cosmetics
testing. About 26 million animals are used for testing each year. Animal testing has been going on
since about the 1850s, although the treatment of animals has greatly improved throughout the years.
People still disagree about whether or not it is ethical. Some of the ways that animals are being used
less for testing include: the use of computer programs to see if products can be used on humans, as
well as people donating their own skin to be tested on. I think this topic is important because I care
about the issue and people still have many strong emotions about it. I have also always wondered
how animal testing happens and why people do it. Do animals have rights? Some people say "If an
individual is a member of a species that lacks the capacity of free moral judgement, then he or she
does not have moral rights. All non–human animal species lack the capacity for free moral
judgement. Therefore, non–human animals do not have rights." The U.S. law allows animals to be
burnt, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and even brain damaged.
On top of this,

Unethical Animal Testing
Many people often oversee the effects of animal testing. This has been going on for decades and
many are unaware of the results and the damages animal testing can cause. Animals undergo a lot of
stress and pain when they are put through experimentations. Many have debated that it is unethical
to test on animals while others say it helps to protect the safety of humans. In my opinion, animal
testing is cruel and should be made illegal. Their lives are just as important as human lives and
should not be treated as experimental animals. The system of an animal differs from the human
system, therefore even if a tested product did not harm the animal, it may or may not be harmful to
humans. Hence, our body system reactions differ from the bodies of an animal. It has been
scientifically proven that 90% of the animals being tested in labs results in death while only a
handful of animal experiments are successful. There are multiple alternative methods rather than
forcefully harming innocent animals. I will explore how animal testing can affect the health of the
animals and if there is possibly a better alternative rather than testing on animals.
Doke, Sonali K. and Shashikant C. Dhawale. "Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Review." Saudi
Pharmaceutical Journal, No. 3, 2015, p. 223. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2013.11.002. Web.
Accessed 16 September 2017.
There are two different types of replacements, relative and absolute. Relative experiment is when
the animals are used in the

Human Testing : The Benefits Of Animal Testing
Animal testing has helped us for years discover cures for sickness in humans and sometimes even
animals. But as long as they test the animals humanely, animals can be tortured with pain from the
testing. However many efforts are being made to reduce the testing to a minimum. Scientists know
that without the tests they wouldn't know how to check the safety of new drugs.
If there was no animal testing scientists would have probably resulted into something very
unacceptable, human testing. And scientists would be committing a human rights atrocity. "it is
probably true that if we experimented directly on people from the beginning, treatments and cures
might be discovered more quickly."(Smith)
Which is why animal testing is more beneficial ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With the help of these studies many illnesses have been found, and there is a solution to those
illnesses from the study of research animals.
Along with the research scientists have found many ways to humanely test the animals, receiving
benefits for humans and animals lives in return. They have made millions of discovers that have
helped with many illnesses that humans and animals.
The opposing view is that in animal testing many animal are researched on and are killed after the
test or are injured and live for the rest of their lives, or the test may not be used for anything useful.
There are many people who believe that animal testing does not benefit for the animal neither the
animal. Others may say that the research is invalid and pointless and that it should be stopped.
Rebuttal: (Evidence that debunks the objection. You must cite and use at least one source);
That is what some believe but through many years of research scientists have been able to find so
many treatments and vaccinations for a deadly illness or disease. HLS(Huntingdon Life
Sciences)was an excellent example for other animal testing associations to obtain the law of
humanly testing the animals and the regulations for animal testing.
Although there are many things that can go wrong with the animal testing. Many discoveries have
been made and millions of animals and humans would not be alive today

Animal Testing Cosmetics On Animals
Sure the final product may look pretty, but is it really worth it to test these products that could be
toxic, on defenceless animals? When people go shopping for cosmetics they can never picture the
product being meant for humans, being used on a defenceless creature such as a bunny or a mouse.
The test are not as accurate as testing on a human. In most cases the animals are never able to live
the life they were meant to. People using animals to test human products on is pointless for many
reasons. Testing cosmetics on animals was a common thing for companies to do in the 1980s. The
types of test they perform on animals are the potential for eye irritation, oral acute toxicity,
photosensitivity, skin irritation, and many more depending on ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Some reasons for this are that it does not put people's lives at risk, it is easier for the scientist to
observe the results, and that it is supposed to be more affordable than testing on humans. The testing
involves multiple experiments and multiple test subjects, but since humans are not used in this form
of testing the harm to them is limited unless they are the ones who are performing the test. The
contact of the product is minimal to the people performing the test. The results of the testing is
easier for the researchers to observe due to the fact that keeping the animals under surveillance is
easier to do rather than keeping a human in surveillance. The animals they use for testing usually
consist of a rodent of some sort. Most companies want to be able to have a safe product that does
not put humans in danger. The toxicity test is one of the most important test and it is extremely
harmful to humans "Most of the new tests assess acute toxicity, but animal use is highest when
testing for the toxic effects of prolonged exposure to chemicals for long–term consequences such as
cancer and reproductive toxicity. These costly procedures are harder to mimic in vitro and may
never be completely replaced."(Abbott). In 1971, a comparison of animal Draize tests in different
labs showed most of the test to be non–reproducible without animal test subjects.(Cole) Cosmetic
companies who use animals for cosmetic testing

Animal Testing :Animal Testing Is Unethical?
Animal Testing Clorox, Johnson & Johnson, Covergirl, Colgate; all of these bands are well known
and very popular. They also are four of the biggest name brands that still test their products on
animals before selling them in stores. Organizations like People for Ethical Treatment of Animals or
PETA have been exposing and discouraging the support of these companies. This helps discourage
companies to not animal test, which they should not. Companies should not test products on animals
because it is unethical, animals make bad test subjects, and there are alternative testing methods.
First of all, animal testing is unethical even if we are more evolved than the animals being tested on.
Scientist force animals into cages and put them through hours, days, or weeks of testing. Testing can
include such things as brutal as water and sleep deprivation, pain infliction, and force feeding food
that the animal is not supposed to eat. The worst part seems to be that the animals have no choice to
be tested on, and after they are most of them are "put down," or killed because the human race has
used them and does not need them any more. A good example of the brutal treatment the helpless
animals get is The Draize Eye Test, in this test bunnies are used to test many soaps and cleaners to
see if they are toxic to human eyes. The Draize Eye test is still common despite the fact that there
are alternative methods. Second, animals are not good test subjects due to the difference of

The Ethics Of Animal Testing
Miranda Green
Mrs. ––––––
English 11
11 June 2017
Animal Testing
Animal testing dates back all the way to Greek physician scientists like Aristotle and Erasistratus.
Greek scientist conducted experiments to understand the anatomy, physiology, pathology, and
pharmacology just like our scientists do today. The moral ethics of animal testing has always been
questioned, but many cures and treatments have been found due to animal testing discoveries.
Animal testing is necessary for humankind 's overall well being, as well as today 's society 's
advancement to further the knowledge of the medical field.
Humans and animals are both very similar in their makeup. Like humans animals share a similar
skin, and organ system that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Hajar) His experiments paved the way for the advancement in the medical field, also for other
scientist to continue discovering that animals can be used to find out more things about human body,
like finding cures and treatments with the help of animal testing. His success is a great example of
how much animal testing can benefit humankind's well being. Another huge discovery that is talked
about every year in science class around the globe is Louis Pasteur's Chicken Cholera Anthrax
vaccine. This vaccine was discovered with animal testing. If no testing was done Anthrax would still
be taking thousands of lives today.(Sun) Numerous diseases have been cured or found treatable due
to animal testing like Smallpox, which has been eradicated from the earth as well as Polio. Vaccines
for Tetanus, Rubella, and Rabies all have been created due to animal testing. So many treatments
that humans take for granted all are possible with the help of animals. Not only have humans been
benefited from animal testing but the veterinary world has also advanced. Animals life span and
overall health care has greatly improved. The vaccines for Rabies, Distemper, Tetanus, Parvovirus
and other illnesses have all benefited the health of all kinds of animals. "For example, cats now have
the treatment for Feline Leukemia."

It is no secret that millions of animals a year are used for medical experimentation. One study
"found the number of animals tested rose from 1,566,994 in 1997 to 2,705,772 in 2012" (Casey). It
is my belief that researchers use virtue theory to defend their experimentations. While animal
activists approach experimentation through the ethics of care. I am against animal experimentation,
but I will also provide insight into why people believe it is ethically just.
Virtue theory is more of a selfish ethics since one's growth and development are seen as an end in
itself and doesn't consider how one's actions affect others. Thus, in relation to animal ethics and
experimentation, animals shouldn't be considered since they cannot discern between what ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If the argument is that animals are being used for testing medicines because they are similar to
human beings, shouldn't the logic follow that because they are so similar to human beings and in
need, we should care for them as well. Although, this is generally not the case. Researchers justify
their experiments using the Animal Welfare Act or AWA saying that because of this act there are
laws in place to stop the mistreatment of animals. Unfortunately, for some animals used in
experimentation such as rats, mice, fish, and birds which make up roughly ninety–five percent of all
animals used, they are not protected under this act. According to the Animal Welfare Act in 2016
they covered 820,812 animals (APHIS), which means there were about twenty–five million animals
that were not covered by the AWA. Because of this lack of coverage, these animals are more likely
to be abused and mistreated since they lack basic protection. Due to the new guidelines in the UK
researchers like Thomas Genarelli won't be able to continue their abuse.
Animal experimentations, like many things, cost money. Researchers need large budgets for
everything including the animals, however since they are desperate to get results and keep their
grants they underestimate the amount of animals needed for testing which results in the tests being
inconclusive and wasting the lives of the animals used in that

Testing On Animals : The Dangers Of Animal Testing
Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name
of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still
prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The
procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of
data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there
are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on
humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals? Animal testing plays a
significant role in scientific discovery to better human health. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
One of the main cosmetic tests used is the "Lethal Dose 50" or (LD50). In this test, animals are
forced to swallow large amounts of the chemicals being tested to verify the dosage level that will
cause death (Corazza, 2017). It is known to cause intense pain and suffering on the animals.
Chemicals are pumped into an animal's stomach until it dies. The reason for the intense pain is that
it can take days or even weeks before the animal dies. In the rare case where test animals are not
killed during the experiment, they are then, "killed either by asphyxiation, breaking of the spinal
cord or decapitation" ("Ward: End support of animal testing by using cruelty free cosmetics", 2015).
Humans use animals to test drugs and cosmetics but they do not respect the animal enough to
provide them with a humane death. Animals are burned, blinded, poisoned, force–fed chemicals,
genetically manipulated, electrocuted and killed, all in the name of science. How is the death of
millions of animals fair and humane for results that are not necessarily justified? Additionally,
animals also undergo immense pain and trauma in the pursuit of results that are not directly
applicable for human use. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S. has been using
animals for testing to conclude that drugs and cosmetics are safe and effective before going into the
human tests since the 1960s. These tests have been going on for

Animal Testing And The Utilization Of Animals
Ever since the beginning of human history, to the reign of the Mongols, and even to the colonization
of the Americas, disease has played a role in shaping society. Its negative impacts has depopulated
many cities, countries, and empires. In the distant past, it was quite difficult to avoid contagious
diseases. However, in today's society, steps have been taken to discover new effective modes of
treatment through animal testing. Such testing; however, has proved to be quite a controversial issue
due to ethics and its utilization of animals. Despite any objections, the use of genetically bred
animals is imperative for the purpose of discovering new medications to treat various terminal
diseases.
Every year, approximately 36 million people die ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Yet, we only use only 26 million animals in research. More specifically, we eat 1,800 more pigs than
are used in the labs. Is our diet really more important than prolonging our lives? In fact, animals
bred for research live longer than animals bred for slaughter. This perception is very unreasonable
considering there is not any ongoing controversy against slaughtering animals for food. This is not
to say that we should not eat pork or beef, but rather it is a statement of agreement that if you are
allowed to take a life of an animal for food, then researchers should have a right to use lab animals
for the purpose of saving lives.
We all hope for that day when animal research is no longer needed, but as of now, it is such a
necessity. If you ask a parent who has a child that is dying from cancer, would you think they would
oppose the only way their child can have a future? If you have a family member who is withering at
the hand of the Alzheimer's disease, would you take away their only hope? If the answer is no, let us
all come together and appreciate lab animals and the function they do to help maintain the human

Animal Testing Uses
Animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to humans in many ways.
(procon.org) They are essential for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology and
health, and for creating and developing new medicines. (yourgenome.org) Animal research helps
save and preserve lives. Animals themselves gain from the results of animal testing. Because
vaccines were tested on animals would have died from rabies. Infections, hepatitis viruses, and
canine pro virus. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of
medication, and check the safety of the products which are destined for human use. The research
animals are cared for by veterinarians, and animal health technicians to ensure their wellbeing ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The US Food and Drug Administration endorses the use of animal tests on cosmetics to ensure the
safety of the product and ingredients. Mosquito repellant which helps protect people from Malaria
and other dangerous illnesses, must undergo toxicological tests in order to be sold in the United
States. (procom.org) It has been estimated that millions of animals per year are used to test the
safety of household cleaners, pesticides, industrial chemicals, food additives, packing materials,
drugs and vaccines for both people and animals, and even the food eaten by other animals. The use
of animals to test cosmetics and other care products has declined in recent years, a wide array of
non–animal skin and eye irritation tests have been developed to determine the effects of short term
exposure to new ingredients. The pressure from the public has played a major role in these
alternatives.
In conclusion, animal research is important to saving the lives of many people. Animal testing is
used to determine how much of a drug is being absorbed into the blood. Animal testing enabled the
development of countless lifesaving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no
alternative method for researching a completely living organism and that strictly regulates and
prevents the mistreatment of animals in the laboratory. (prezi.com) Animals should be used in
laboratories to continue to find advancements

Animal Testing Beneficial
The use of animals for developing new cosmetics and for educational purposes, known as animal
testing, has been going on for years. In the medical field, there is a need for testing on animals of
various different things. Most importantly, over 26 million animals each year is used for medical
purposes: biomedical research and clinical research. Whereas in often areas animal testing is cruel
and unnecessary.
In order for the scientists to know how diseases progress in humans, they need to study the
mechanism of a body. A form of testing that is used in the medical field is biomedical research.
Biomedical research is "the broad area of science that involves the investigation of the biological
process and the causes of disease through careful ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"USA spends $16 billion dollars annually for animal testing at taxpayers' expense and is subject to
massive waste and mismanagement of taxpayers' dollars" (Terrance). Governments don't fund for
the animal testing that is held taxpayers' money is used in animal research without them knowing it.
With the money used for animal testing, many other alternatives are created.
In conclusion, since 304 BC animals have benefited humans in various ways such as from
discovering medicines or by discovering how the diseases progress on humans. Although a lot of
medicines used in this modern world using animals, there is an alternative

Animal Testing
Animal testing is a controversial topic in today's society, much more than it was 100's of years ago.
Testing on animals was practiced long ago, and is still practiced today. Greek writings about
vivisection [the dissection of a live organism] can be found dated as early as 500 BC. At that time, in
Ancient Rome and Alexandria, and later in Greece, vivisection was originally practiced on human
criminals, but prohibitions on the mutilation of the human body soon arose. This caused a reliance
on animals as a substitute for humans. Many physician–scientists believed that animals lacked
intelligence, so justice and injustice could not possibly apply to them. One such physician–scientist
was the popular Aristotle. Other physician–philosophers such as Galen (130–200 AD) engaged in
public vivisections, which was a popular form of entertainment. The purpose of vivisection was to
develop theories of human anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. In one of Galen's
experiments on an animal, he demonstrated that arteries actually contained blood, disproving earlier
physician's belief that the arteries contained air. A French philosopher named René Descartes (1596–
1650) experimented occasionally on animals as well. He believed that animals were automata;
unable to experience pain and suffering in the same way humans do. Lastly, English Physician
William Harvey (1578–1657), through vivisection experimentation, discovered that the heart was
the organ that circulated blood

Unethical Animal Testing
Within laboratory walls, the worst forms of institutionalized animal abuse is conducted. This abuse
and torture is also known as animal testing and is primarily done with the expectation of find a cure
to various illnesses. Scientists use this harsh research to gain control over behavior or biological
systems. During the experiments helpless animals are exploited and endure great suffering. These
conditions along with the feelings of the animals are unacknowledged in the name of medical
research. The use of animals in medical research is essentially legal abuse. Animal testing for
medical research should be made illegal because it is unethical, unreliable, and archaic.
Testing on animals for medical reasons does not make it okay. It is unethical that these animals are
taken from their habitats and placed in confined cages to be test subjects. The experiments these
animals are subject to include poisoning, vivisection and toxicology. That can be considered lucky,
compared to others who are burned, crippled, and neglected intentionally in the name of medicine.
At this time, there is no form of testing considered illegal. They are used as subjects until death.
After each experiment data is recorded and time is allowed for the animal to heal for the next
experiment (Cruelty Free). If the test results are not too harsh the testing continues with more
dosage or a different product. Animals that survive cannot be released back into nature because the
subject could negatively affect the ecosystem; even those that survive all experiments are killed
(Neavs). Those animals never got to experience life outside of a laboratory. The conditions these
animals go through are morally wrong but are ignored because it is considered research. The use of
animals in should immediately be stopped and outlawed because it not right to sentence a creature to
death because they have no say–so.
Along with being morally wrong, animal testing is unreliable because many of the diseases humans
acquire animals naturally do not develop. This includes diseases such as heart disease, many types
of cancers and diabetes (Wise). "If animals differ so much from humans in their reactions, how can
one test drugs on them that are intended for

Animal Testing : The Misuse Of Animals For Testing
The Misuse of Animals for Testing Animals have been the source for research testing since 500 BC,
the methods are old and outdated. 100 million animals are tested on each year in the U.S. Some of
these include mice, rats, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, and monkeys. These animals are used for
testing cosmetics, drugs, and experimentation; they sit in cages their whole life until they die.
Animals should not be used as test subjects in any case because they are treated in cruel ways and
suffer tremendously. Animals are tested on to ensure that the product is safe for humans, but
numerous products and drugs that are safe on animals fail when tested on people; causing damage or
in some cases death. In 2004 the U.S. FDA did a study and found that "92 percent of drugs entering
clinical trials following animal testing fail to be approved" (Livescience). For those that pass, many
are withdrawn and not used, leaving the countless animal tests used for the product useless. Humans
and animals are not all that alike, and testing on animals would create unlikely results that a human
would encounter. Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University, Paul Furlong states "it's
very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the
human" (Pro–Con.org), and Thomas Hartung, Professor of evidence–based toxicology at Johns
Hopkins University, argues for alternatives to animal testing because "we are not 70 kg rats." (Pro–
Con.org). The

Critics argue that researching and testing on animals is necessary as it leads to many medical
advances and breakthroughs. Some medical advances that have resulted from animal testing include
blood transfusions, insulin, antibiotics, asthma medicine, vaccines, transplants, numerous drugs,
Parkinson's disease, and chemotherapy. Although new valuable information has been gained from
animal research, times have changed and there are now more humane ways to do research. In Vitro
testing, computer modeling, and human–patient simulators are some of the alternative methods that
can replace animal testing. In Vitro methods use human cells and tissues to study diseases and test
products. There are two types of In Vitro methods: Organ on chips and 3–D printing human skin.
Organ on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
3–D printing human skin replicates human tissue and allows for the printing of body parts including
heart valves, ears, bone, and skin. These replicated tissues replace the need for animal testing.
Computer modeling, another method to replace animal testing, has the ability to simulate human
biology and accurately predict how drugs will react in the human body. Amy Clippinger, a cellular
and molecular biologist at PETA states, "Computer models have saved millions of animals from
suffering in toxicity and drug testing experiments" (PETA). Computer models provide a great
alternative to testing on animals and is way more humane. The third alternative is human–patient
simulators that can give accurate biological responses to medications and diseases, ultimately
replacing the need for crude animal tests. All three alternatives–In Vitro testing, computer modeling,
and human–patient simulators– are more reliable, less costly, and have the power to advance
medical research and lead to new breakthroughs. Therefore, despite what critics say, animal testing
is no longer

Arguments For Animal Testing
Testing on animals has been a thing for so many years now. In fact, many scientists believe it should
be done before human testing. But with it being around for so long, it has become a subject of
controversy. People around the world share their views and opinions about whether it's really
necessary, and some even question if the process is even ethical. While it is sad that animals have to
come to terrible fates,the process of animal testing is absolutely essential to test the safety of
products. Besides the obvious benefit, which is that animal testing saves lives, results are generated
quicker with animal testing, so diseases can be cured faster. Sometimes the illnesses cured can affect
animals too, so humans aren't the only ones benefited. Animals are also benefited by the guidelines
put in place by the Animal Welfare Act, which makes sure that animals are treated fairly during the
testing process. All in all animal testing is without a doubt crucial to test products that save both
human and animal lives.
Before putting a product out in the world scientist have to first make sure it is safe for people to use.
To do this they have to test it on a living being. As said before most scientists prefer to do animal
testing first. They are able to do this because animals and humans are very similar we have the same
organ systems that do the same things in roughly the same way. In the article, Animal Testing Saves
by Nicholas Clark, Clark quoted,"animals are genetically

The Importance Of Animal Testing

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Felicia Barker

More from Felicia Barker (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Importance Of Animal Testing