Impact On The Military Force Essay

Impact On The Military Force Essay
What is the Impact on the Force? For those examples above, Soldiers are reluctant to report crime
and misconduct because unlike civilian victims, military members must rely upon internal military
channels with at times no clear guidance and no right to an independent investigating officer. Even if
the victim prevails in a case such as sexual harassment, the remedies available to him/her are
limited. The victim receives limited or no compensation has no right to the written statement of
findings, is not guaranteed that the complaint will be substantiated. The commander has a great
discretion as to what actions to take against the alleged offender. The victim may also fear reprisals
for reporting a concern since many times the protection against retaliations is ineffective; her
supervisors and peers may regard the victim as a trouble maker instead of a team player. For those
reasons and not being well ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At the same time, members of congress and the American people are continuously given the
impression that commanders make unethical decisions in by deciding whether to prosecute or to
overturn a conviction. The recommendation to fix the root cause would to overhaul the Uniform
Code of Military Justice. Commanders should retain jurisdiction over crimes that impact good order
and discipline such as misdemeanor crimes where the service member can be rehabilitated such as
disrespect, late for formation or petty theft and be advised by SJAs in the command. We also need to
ensure that commanders do not become impartial when it comes to reprimanding the alleged
offender. Felony crimes such as sexual assault, child pornography, murder, etc. – would be turned
over to the proper authorities outside the chain of command and confined in a military prison should
be prosecuted by trial lawyers as in the case of sexual assaults are
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Military Force Creative Writing
Hurry Up and Tell Them Before it's Too Late
Droplets of cold sweat trickled down the boy's forehead, his legs felt as if thousands of pounds were
shackled to them. He staggered away rapidly and relentlessly in utter desperation like one trying to
elude a swarm of furious hornets. Trembling, muscles tense, pulse throbbing, red and fiery tension
was in the air as if a raging volcano had just erupted. Insidious shrieks of horror wailed from back
behind the corridor, followed by the sounds of muffled shouting and other unorthodox noises too
distorted to make out. Hissing sirens cried from outside the walls, and the sound of helicopter blades
thundered noisily above. Ominous, grey, sickening puffs of suffocating smoke poured through the
halls, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"You were brave enough to secretly listen to the culprits' plans and write down the location of the
bomb when you heard them say it. That information allowed us to find and deactivate it in a timbale
fashion, hence allowing our special forces to apprehend the culprits without them having the threat
of a bomb to use at their disposal. As I said, we have captured the criminals and interrogated most of
the information out of them. Allow me to explain what we know. As it turns out, they were after
money. They had this operation planned out months in advance, secretly infiltrating the school
grounds during the summer, planting lightweight bombs throughout the school plus one enormous
one that would have leveled the facility all the way up to the parking lot. The bombers did not
invade in person. Instead, they initially set up communication systems so they could project their
voices on the school loud speakers from a distance. It was then on that day that the culprits made the
random announcement that the school's actions were under their demand, and then they immediately
detonated one of the light weight bombs as an example. It turns out that their target was extremely
specific, that being class 88C. There were multiple students in that classroom whose parents had net
worths of over a million. Based on what you told us, the voices on the loud speakers said something
like 'Nobody in class 88C move or the

Utilitarianism: The Use Of Military Force
When are the circumstances under which it is or is not legitimate to use military force against
another group or country?
In this time of age the use of military force is a massive debate. With how long we were in Iraq and
Afghanistan to the rise of Terrorism, like such groups as ISIS. People have continued to oppose the
use of our military forces in different countries and at the same time we force our own problem.
There is a lot of discussion before it even reaches the point to discuss even if we should go to war.
We just don't jump in at every battle that happens, we have to look at all angles. Like if we jump and
stop this will our alliances grow stronger with the country we are helping or will this stop it for
reaching our shores. It could also have the total opposite effect, like will it cause us to have more
enemies if we intervene in a religious war (for example Israel). People are too quick to judge to
notice all the different outcomes that could happen if we don't go to war or if we do go to war. This
proves that different circumstances could come about to push us to decide the use of military use
against someone else. Now we need to know if we can decide at what point is the right time or right
circumstance to make that decision.
Theory ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Utilitarianism is the concept that the moral worth of an action is determined exclusively by its
contribution to overall utility, that is, its contribution to happiness or pleasure as summed among all
people."

The Use Of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution
The Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq Resolution was enacted in 2002 after being
signed by the President in October, 2002 at a time when the congress was significantly influenced
by the terror attacks carried out by the Al–Qaeda group which was funded by Iraq. The President
George W. Bush initiated the resolution through a declaration to the General Assembly of the United
Nations that it was adopting a resolution in protection of its national security with or without support
of the Security Council. The resolution which had limited time from its initiation and enactment was
greatly influenced by the political campaign of the presidential elections in which George W. Bush
had been an influence to the Republican party and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States of America was also threatened through hostility demonstrated by the 1993
assassination attempt on George H.W Bush and firing of the coalition aircraft after the 1991 Gulf
war. The State of Iraq continued to aid other international terrorist organizations, which were
especially the anti–United States. The resolution was therefore adopted to prevent such acts by Iraq.
The Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq Resolution was also supported by other
states in its adoption as they wanted Saddam Hussein (the president of Iraq at the time) to be
removed from power. The other states which adopted the resolution included Turkey, Kuwait and
Saudi Arabia.
The legislation was also adopted as required by the Constitution and the Congress for the president
to fight terrorism against the United States. This was also emphasized by the Iraq Liberation Act of
1998 which stated that it should be part of the United States' policy to remove the Saddam Hussein
regime and promote a democratic type of governance (Weisburd, 2004). The United States also
believed that the Al–Qaeda organization was responsible for terrorist attacks such as 9/11 and
therefore need to protect its citizens from such attacks in the future. Furthermore, the United States
desired to have the country's national security reinstated (Weisburd, 2004). The United Nations
Security Council

Military Force During The Soviet Union
Military Force Justified
The use of military force can be justified on any act of military use towards defense, threats, and to
keep world peace. Which has happened in the past years and will happen later in the future. For
example the Cold War, Vietnam, and Iraq these are, where our government used military force and
justified it. These example show that military force can be justified during an act against our
country, endangering world peace and terrorist attacks against our country. As well as any act of
attack against us. Therefor military force can be justified in times of threats, defense, and most to
keep world peace.
The cold war was when the communist was expanding and in other governments. Which lead to
revolutions and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Which our navy and the Russian ship and United states ship where face to face for sixteen days and
one mistake and a nuclear war would off broken out. Therefore military should be justified as
defense, threats, and to keep world peace
Moreover the history of military force being justified, "[t]he lesson of the Vietnam war and Beirut
loomed in November of 1984, when Reagan 's Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger gave an
influential speech embracing many of military concerns" (Young).The Vietnam is an example of
military force not being justified correct. Which was to stop communism from spreading but was
used as an excuse to us military force. However, many wars are still being started to prove countries
military power against the smallest threats and want to justify military force. So any threat, defense
or to keep world peace military force should be justified for the big problems against our country.
According to Young, "using forceonly when objectives are clearly defined and results reasonably
achievable"(Young). Which explains that military force to be justified needs to be clearly settled and
rational to make the justification and take action. Its rationale in having a good case to us military
force in a defense, threats, and to keep world peace. However it also need to be justified by the
countries government and people in the country to justify military

Use Of Military Force
You are the Secretary of Defense and the President has asked you to advise him on the use of
military force.What are the costs and benefits of resorting to force? The Secretary of Defense's job
entails of many main responsibilities. One of the many being that it exercises authority, direction
and control over the department. The Department of Defense is directly under the president, who is
the Commander in Chief. The main objective of the Department of Defense is to provide the
military the necessary resources, means and power to deter war and protect the citizens of the
country. The main headquarters of the Department of Defense is at the Pentagon, which is located in
Arlington County, Virginia. There are many military forces in the United

Military Force Persuasive Essay
Given the fact that the US–led NATO alliance was far superior in virtually every way to Slobodan
Milosevic's military force, why was NATO unable to achieve a quick, decisive end to the conflict,
and avoid the engineered mass migration of immigrants out of Kosovo? Because Milosevic's
strategy in the areas of intelligence gathering and targeting of alliances to defeat the enemy, were
masterful employments of military theory as described by Sun Tzu, Carl Von Clausewitz and others.
Sun Tzu says, "The reason the enlightened prince and the wise general conquer the enemy whenever
they move and their achievements surpass those of ordinary men is foreknowledge." Milosevic used
intelligence collected from various media sources, prominent international ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Defensively, Milosevic knew that there was really no appetite within NATO, for a prolonged
bombing campaign. The US had made it known that a bombing campaign would not last more than
a few days, and believed a few days would be enough for Milosevic to concede. Additionally, he had
received information from France and others in NATO that the target list would be narrow. This
information prompted him to be more cavalier in his approach. Rather than giving up without a fight
and getting nothing for his troubles, he understood that he would be bombed, but he also knew that
he only had to outlast the first few days until NATO realized bombing would not accomplish its
objectives. He went so far as to make it known that he would not capitulate, and he could, and
would, withstand a few days of bombing. From an offensive perspective, he knew the use of mass
expulsions of refugees into neighboring European countries had far greater influence than military
action, and would most–likely be more effective in achieving his objectives. Polls taken in the years
leading up to this event indicated that the majority of European countries were 60 percent to 80
percent in favor of reducing, or stopping all together, immigration from the east. Immigrants and the
associated economic burdens

Why Is Military Force Justified?
The assumed solution to today's many problems, especially between countries, is war. Killing,
genocide, torture, violence and suffering will not solve anything rather just bring fear and
vengeance. I personally think calling in the national guards to contain the rioters in various
situations isn't always the best solution to the problem because rioters want their voice to be heard
through, all they want is to negotiate they don't always intend for violence. If the local police cannot
handle the situation then military force should be called in the absolute worse situation when
citizens lives are at risk. Military force shouldn't be called in for riots or protests. It only aggravates
the rioters and protestors. Not solving the situation. It's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The important question, however, is when it's justified. What is military force exactly? It's when a
country's military, also known as its armed forces, have no other choice but to use deadly force and
weapons to support the interest of the state and of it's citizens. This means casing fire on the enemy,
dropping bombs from planes, detonating nuclear warheads, even restoring biological warfare. It's
something many countries of the world have means and desires to do even some of the minor less
economically developed countries. So when is military forced justified? Some say military force is
justified when there is an impending threat to one's borders. Which to a point is understandable, If
the situation can not be solved through negotiations then depending on the situation military force
should be used as justifiable. IF a country is on the verge of being invaded, it's military should have
the right to use military force. In the past there have been many who have fried to using military
force, violence, force to gain power and ones trust by putting fear into

The US Military: The United States Armed Force
Throughout the course of history it has been proven that a country cannot survive without
employing the use of armed forces. These forces offer security to the people of the nation. Having a
strong military base allows the United States to have allies, as well as being a power house country.
Through the actions of our soldiers, we have been able to protect our homeland along with
providing aides to other countries in need. Currently, there are three main branches of the US
Military; the United States Army, the United States Air Force and the United States Navy. The
United States Army was founded on June 03, 1784. This group is the largest and oldest branch of the
military. The army is responsible for land based operations, both foreign and

Military Task Force The Killing Of Bin Laden
Military Task Force The killing of Bin Laden was one of the biggest examples of how a good
Military task force like Navy seals has become. Arkin and Priest (2001) give us an idea how the
Joint Special Operations team has been improving over the years and how they carry out top secret
missions. When you have a good Military task force then their a higher chance to save hostages
lives and we been seeing a trend in where government send out their best units to save those
hostage. They can come out saving the hostage or not, but the main idea of Special Military Task
force is to do the best to save them. The government develops a plan to save them instead of
following appeasement because they will not give in demands from terrorist. This method

Expeditionary Military Force
EF–21 describes as the Marine Corps serving as an "expeditionary force–in–readiness" that focuses
on amphibious operations centered on a culture that "fast, austere, lethal". The adage that "words
have meaning" should be considered when we start talking about employing a lethal force that is
built upon the idea that individual units will act in accordance with broad intent and limited support.
Peace operations in particular present a unique set of challenges as civil and military considerations
change throughout the operation and those considerations are necessarily accompanied by restrictive
ROE and codes of conduct. In general this long term "police" type action is not well suited to a force
dedicated to being "the right force at the right ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On the other hand employing a MEU in DSCA operations makes a tremendous amount of sense, at
least historically (due to the short timeline of employment). Lesson 3's slide highlights an excellent
example with the LA Riots of 1992, 1500 Marines were employed as part of a joint task force to
restore order after the Rodney King verdict there was a clear mission with achievable goals in the
near term (right force, right time). The other example of Hurricane Sandy and the 26th MEU
highlights the same clear achievable mission where Marines can be employed providing large
movements and large impact over the short term but without becoming bogged down in long term
relief actions better suited to other organizations. The difference between Peace Operations and
DSCA is having a clear achievable mission with a relatively short timeline that takes advantages of
the strengths of a MEU (or Marines in general), something not typical of operations like

SHARP in the Military Work Force Essay
Jamil E. Gutierrez Professor Sharp English Composition 2012 DEC 02 SHARP in the Military Work
Force Women have been sexually harassed and assaulted in the work force for years, and for many
years, the US Army has been dealing with this enormous and overwhelming issue, through the help
of their agency known as the Equal Opportunity Program (EOP). In the US Army regulation 600–
20, Army Chief of Staff, General Raymond T Odierno, States the purpose, "This regulation
prescribes the policies and responsibilities of command, which include the Well–being of the force,
military discipline, and conduct, the Army Equal Opportunity (EO) Program, and the Army Sexual
Assault Victim Program." For a long time, the Army's EOP Equal Opportunity ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
With all the current scandals at the highest levels how can the subordinates feel they were being
protected, and the US Army has their best interest at hand? Currently we have the national director
of the CIA Ret. General Petreaus, under current investigation for a national security scandal and an
admitted affair. I would like to know how many soldiers under his command, during his entire
service to the Army has he punished, and kicked soldiers out the Army for sexual harassment or
committing adultery? Can the Army explain the lack of enforcing standards? Rather they have
established a double standard. Now you have Col James H. Johnson III, who was recently convicted
of this related issue. In a recent article in the Stars and Stripes, June 14, 2012, Nancy Montgomery
wrote "KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany – Col. James Johnson, convicted of fraud, bigamy, and
conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, was sentenced Thursday to a reprimand and a
$300,000 fine." This Officer was in charge for the morale, welfare and protection of more than
20,000 soldiers under his command during the time of war. How can the Army put trust in these
high ranking officials? The Army currently has another case pending, in a recent article in the Army
Times, Associated Press, Michael Biesecker, "FORT BRAGG, N.C. – Defense lawyers representing
an Army general facing sexual misconduct charges aimed Thursday to paint his primary accuser

The Military Forces in Myanmar
As a relatively young country (in recent independence) only gaining its independence from Great
Britain in 1948, Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, has been crippled by the influence of its
extensive colonial history . The various governments in Myanmar's independence thus far, often run
on empty promises and heavy artillery, have done little good for the country. The military forces in
Myanmar have grown tremendously to the detriment of both prodemocracy leaders as well as the
country's population as a whole . Any attempted uprising in the country is quickly met with brute
force as seen in the recent failed Saffron Revolution . The focus of the government on the growth of
military power to the neglect of social and economic prosperity has ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Trend continued well into the Anglo–Burmese war of 1824. Burma lost and as a result had to cede
of its land to British India. By 1885, the entirety of Burma was a province of British India until 1937
when it became a crown colony of Britain . It wasn't until Japan invaded Burma in the 1940s that the
Burmese were able to successfully resist foreign rule. Even in its Colonial period there was a lack of
widespread internal stability, this would create the trend that would theoretically justify the harsh
choices of the current government . Additionally the relative closeness of the shifts in government
that occurred during the colonial period could also explain why the Burmese government has
difficulty dealing with transition.
Burma officially gained its independence from Britain in 1948 by negotiations lead by nationalist
leader Aung San . After the success of these negotiations San was plagued with the daunting task of
unifying the various ethnic factions under one union. However before he could take any actions
towards achieving this task, he was assassinated. Once again hope was lost with the deaths of San
and other nationalist leaders, inter ethnic group conflicts ensued. The makeshift government that had
been formed as an

Military Force Justified Essay
Being one of the world's most influential and powerful military forces can have its downfalls and its
advantages. Being regarded as sort of the world's caretaker by always assisting nations through
humanitarian needs no matter if they are allies or not is categorized as one of the downfalls, while
having the authoritative power to separate itself from other nations as a military superpower is a
perk. When possessing the powerful military America has, countless situations arise where the
opportunity for the United States to flex their figurative muscles are presented. The driving force
behind the debate of when United States force is justified is should the military be used for self–
defense and the safety of our strong allies? Or should the United States use their powerful military's
precious resources like money, firearms and American personnel to defend the human rights and
safety of nations around the world no matter the correlation with the U.S? The United States ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
1). Resulting from this, America launched 59 tomahawk cruise missiles at the airbase that
supposedly launched the chemical attack. The use of military force in this case is justified because
the threat of the spread of chemical weapons was present. The use of chemical weapons around the
world is prohibited under a series of international treaties and is a violation of international criminal
law (5 Things You Should Know About Chemical Weapons and International Law par. 1). Bombing
Syria was not in result of the Syrian citizens killed, but in result of the illegal use of chemical
weapons. The attack was meant to punish the leader of Syria for the illegal use of chemical weapons
and to prevent use in the future which could harm allies and potentially America. The goal was to
eliminate the idea that it is okay to use chemical weapons, not punish Al–Assad for killing innocent

Military Force
The circumstances under which it is or is not legitimate to use military force against another group
or country? When should the United States intervene in Global conflicts? The use of military force
is one of the most seriously debated topics in all generations. Many top generals and commanders
have a different way on how they use military force and how they advise the President of the United
States to take action. Every four years during a presidential debate, it is brought up by the mediator
on how to deal with foreign politics and the use of the military. When you are a part of one of the
world's most powerful military forces can you turn your head and do nothing, while other nations
suffer? America doesn't go into war blind there are decisions, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This theory does not look at the consequences of our acts (as in utilitarianism, or consequentialism)
or at the acts themselves and the rules that guide those acts (as in deontology, or none
consequentialism). Rather, it looks at the character of the person acting. There are a lot of people
who think that the United States military need to focus on their own problems in America rather
than trying to concern themselves with global conflicts. During the progressive era the United States
was torn on the home front between people who wanted to expand American foreign policies and
those who didn't. The United States were preaching their doctrine, democracy and freedom to all the
nations, but within the United States they were facing slavery, immigration and discrimination
against different ethnic groups. However, this was due to the fact that in a democracy, our,
presidency changes every four years and each president may have different perspectives on how to
deal with inside and outside threats. "Aristotle insists that the virtuous person will have the right
amount of courage and will aim at what he calls the golden mean between having too little and
having too much of a given characteristic. Thus, someone who displays little generosity will fall on
one end of the spectrum (miserly); someone who is much too generous will fall on the opposite end
(wasteful); and a moderately generous person falls in the

The Military Force of Thailand
As far as we are concerned, unlike other Asian countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia and others,
Thailand military forces portrayed a significant concern pertaining to internal turbulence within
Thailand. (Simon, 2000, p. 13) This is because, for several decades, since communist aggression and
until todays, internal security has become the main core focus of Thailand military forces in the
aspects of defence and security of Thailand (Taylor, 2013, p. 12); compared to other aspects such as
external defence. Before discussing or deliberating the roles of Thailand military forces in internal
security, it is better for us to understand the definition of internal security because it might raise
confusion as it both aspects are associated closely with the national interest of a country. As coined
by the Democratic Republic of Timor–Leste National Parliament (2003), internal security is defined
as an activity or program advanced by the State (Government) with the aims to guarantee order,
security and public peacefulness, to safeguards people and goods, to prevent law–breaking and
contribute to guarantee the normal functioning of the democratic institutions. Through this clear
definition, it is clear that external security and internal security are different with each other. In
Thailand, the military undertook a crucial role of internal security pertaining to the Burmese
refugees and insurgency in the southernmost of Thailand insurgency by the Malay–Muslim
insurgent. (Taylor,

Military Porter's Five Forces
Military defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, General Dynamics, and the
lesser known United Technologies Corporation take a tremendous amount of criticism for their
supposed contribution to military conflicts. This is of course an understandable sentiment for people
to have regarding these companies. These arms manufacturers traffic in military grade weaponry to
various countries that can then go on to use this equipment to do harm. United Technologies
Corporation, the obvious subject of this paper, has recently faced harsh criticism, and even legal
ramifications, for selling military equipment on the Asian market. The reasoning behind this
criticism comes from the fact that selling arms to these Asian nations could ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There is the argument however, that the tensions between Asian countries exist for other reasons,
and arms manufacturers are simply fulfilling a need on a global market. An example of this is in a
conflict that has dominated international news stories in recent years, and that is the disputed claims
over the South China Sea. This is yet another complicated issue, but to sum it up briefly the South
China Sea (known as the East Sea in Vietnam, and the West Sea in the Philippines) is contested,
predictability, by China, Vietnam, the Philippines, and other Asian countries. Most of the debate
stems from which nations owns the rights to exploit the resources of the area, and claims over
various islands. Siemon Wezeman of the SIPRI Arms and Military Expenditure Program had this to
say regarding the South China Sea conflict's responsibility in increasing arms procurement by Asian
countries, "There are several large countries in Asia that will keep importing at high levels, and
many smaller ones that also will do so. Most have substantial ongoing arms procurement contracts
for imported weapons or have new contracts signed already. This alone will keep Asia's arms
imports

Authorization For Use Of Military Force Essay
The Authorization for Use of Military Force was a quick band aid reaction to the attack on
September 11th. It's vague definitions of threats and allowance of any use of force deemed
necessary has helped continue what seems like a never ending war. With such a devastating attack
on our nation, of course there was emotional turmoil, but that should not have influenced such rash
decisions to start a war. I agree with Johnsen that the AUMF is the "most dangerous" sentence in
U.S history. As Johnsen mentions, this decision, like many others was "based on fear rather than
foresight" (12). Over a decade after the authorization was passed, it still has been used to justify
occupation and torture without being adjusted to the changing foreign policy circumstances. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Along with Article II of the Constitution, the president has too much influence and can essentially
do whatever they want. Johnsen brings up a great point about what is actually "out of bounds" in the
AUMF? When waging a war on an ideology, the war on terror, this vague authorization allows an
increase in violence, U.S military involvement, and overall U.S control over other states. No one
seems to know what success looks like and with this authorization the U.S has corned itself with its
military injustice and involvement in foreign countries. Removing the troops and saying he will
close Guantanamo Bay are great steps forward that Obama has pledged, however, create immense
consequences that the U.S will face it changes their policies. The AUMF has furthered a cycle of
military security issues and military involvement leaving other nations ridden with

The Influence Of The Russian Military Forces
Russia also has influences on other nations due to its increase of military force and the result of what
citizens do by joining other organizations. The Russian government has been investing more money
into the military, and now the rest of the world is able to see the benefits Russia has reaped from
doing this. Russia has plans to produce both more power and greater number of jets and ships. The
number naval ships which Russia plans to have for its Navy are going to continue to grow
incrementally, "In 2013, it was 5,900 days [of sailings]. In 2014, already 12,700, in 2015 – 14,200,
in 2016 – 15,600, and in 2017 – 17,100 days," the Admiral says." (Nilsen, 2017) This will be used to
help increase the patrol in a certain region of Russia ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, "When commissioned, the submarine will carry 16 Bulava ballistic missiles." (Nilsen,
2017). The Russian military is making advances which will give it advantages if the machines which
they made need to be used to protect their country.
Russian citizens also have an impact on the remainder of the world due to organizations which they
join and some of these organizations are not backed by the Russian government. A small portion of
Russian people are joining ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) fighter, because the majority
of the recruits are those who were captured and converted. The way Russian people are recognized
is when other governments step in to eliminate the terrorism they are provoking, "Russian ISIL
fighters who had been killed, sentenced to death or jailed in Syria or Iraq." (Mirovalev, 2017) The
largest amount of recruits come from Russia: the most out of any of the surrounding countries,
"Almost 3,500 Russians fight for ISIL, making Russia the largest source of recruits – ahead of Saudi
Arabia and Jordan" (Mirovalev, 2017) This is a cause for interest: while people are joining other
organizations, Russia is also increasing their military force to be competitive to forces similar to
this.
The security Russian government, the people, and the effect it has on other countries is more drastic
than it would appear. The people of Russia are very split in the

The Role Of Rape In The Military Force
Sexual Abuse is known to occur among any relationship, race, sex, and gender, including male
victims and homosexual couples. When rape is committed, authorities do what's possible in order to
seek justice. However, when the authoritative ones are those whom commit the crime, it is nearly
impossible to seek justice. In the military forces, rape is the main issue among the soldiers and the
authority figures. Although men are victimized in several cases, women constantly suffer from
unjustified rape. Participating in sexual assaults are led due to external theories of gender
construction, such as the Social–Learning Theory, supporting the influence of patriarchy (Barbara F.
McManus, pt. 3). Male authorities allow corruption of the military forces against rape, initiating
obstacles towards the justice for women. Rape plays a role as an underdog in the military forces for
the majority of male soldiers and officers. In Nicola Gavey's Fighting Rape, he states "...Rape is not
an inevitable outcome ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rather it...refers to as 'language of rape'...described as the 'cultural scaffolding of rape': the dominant
discourses of sex and gender that position men as normatively and naturally both sexually driven
and aggressive, and women as sexually passive and vulnerable..." (Nicola Gavey, 199). Gavey is
basically saying that society is making excuses as to why men decide to take part in such an
unethical action known as rape. Focusing too much on the fact that male authorities are the main
reason for the created obstacles towards the justice of women and rape in the military, it is ignored
that society's standards and gender markers among what men and women are and how they act, is
the main reason why the justice for women and rape is practically impossible and constantly being
encouraged among men. The Poststructuralist Claim (Nicolas Gavey, 199) about rape creates an
excuse for the prevention of

Edward Luttwak 's Analysis On Military Force, Military...
Edward Luttwak's analysis of Roman strategy evaluates the link between military force, military
power, policy, and deterrence. Luttwak describes force as the actual application of a state's military
capability while power is derived from the state's perceived ability to impose force. The Romans
employed a combination of force and power to achieve their policy aims regarding security.
Deterrence provides security by relying on power and the threat of force to prevent an adversary
from committing an unwanted act. Today, United States policy leverages the nation's perceived
power, bolstered by its potential to employ force, in order to deter aggression by potential
adversaries and enhance security. To begin, it is important to explore Luttwak's definitions of force
and power. He describes the use of military force as a finite ability to directly apply military means
in order to force an adversary's compliance. A state's ability to use force is thus limited by the size of
its military capability and its ability to concentrate that capability against an enemy. More
importantly, once military forces are committed to an action they are no longer available to pursue
other objectives and are essentially consumed. The implication is that reliance on military force
limits a state's ability to achieve its objectives to the amount of force it can employ at a given time
and place. Examples of the finite nature of military force are numerous. Luttwak points to

Authorization For Use Of Military Force
Authorization for Use of Military Force Essay
Micah Johnston
24 January 2015
Dr. John Becker
Comprehending the underlying authority for the President of the United States to authorize the
international use of military operations in order to respond to an attack or as a counter–terrorism
strategy, may be difficult to fathom for those who are not familiar with practices and philosophies
associated in this realm. Conducting military operations against the Taliban government in
Afghanistan, detaining suspected terrorists, both indefinitely domestically and abroad, and the use of
unmanned drones to disrupt and destroy suspected terrorists and those aiding them in areas such as
Pakistan fall under the umbrella of what the US has been able to accomplish in our last 12 years
during the Global War on Terror. Under the provisions within the September 18th, 2001 "
Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), the United States was able to grant the: "... [the
ability to] authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent
attacks launched against the United States..."
Other expansions of power include:
"...the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations,
organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist
attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to
prevent any future acts of

Military Force Essay
What They Do
The members of the U.S Military service maintain protecting the U.S national defense. Some
members work in occupations such as a fighter pilot or infantryman. While others prefer to work in
the civilian workplaces to be doctors, nurses, or lawyers. Members of the military serve in the Army,
Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard. Also, they could be in the components of the
reserved forces, such as Air National Guard or Army National Guard. The Military discriminates
between enlisted and officer careers. Enlisted personnel make up about 82 percent of the Armed
Forces and carry out military operations. The remaining 18 percent are officers. Officers are military
leaders who manage operations and enlisted personnel.
How ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, about 1.0 million people served in the Reserves in these branches and in the Air
National Guard and Army
National Guard. The specific work environments and conditions pertaining to military occupations
depend on the occupational specialty, unit, branch of service, and other factors. Most active–duty
military personnel live and work on or near military bases and facilities throughout the United States
and the world.
Pay–Hourly or Wage
Basic pay is based on rank and time in service. The pay in the Military is the same in all branches.
Members of the Armed Forces may receive additional pay based on their job assignment or
qualifications. For example, they receive additional pay for foreign, hazardous, submarine, or flight
duty, or for being medical or dental officers. Retirement pay is generally available after 20 years of
service. In addition to receiving basic pay, members of the military are either housed free of charge
on base or they receive a housing allowance. Members who serve for a certain number of years may
receive other benefits. These benefits may include educational benefits through the Montgomery GI
Bill, which pays for a portion of educational costs at accredited institutions. Also members may
receive medical care at military or U.S Department of Veterans Affair hospitals and guaranteed
home

The Role Of Logistics Air Force ( Usaf ) Operations And By...
I. INTRODUCTION
Background The role of logistics in United States Air Force (USAF) operations and by extension
United States military operations cannot be underestimated nor undervalued. People of both
professional and academic backgrounds have spent considerable time studying and capturing the
relevant points of its application. While critical to almost all military units and corporations alike,
logistics in definition and application is not easily defined. It is an over–arching word covering
many disparate topics such as supply, sustainment, production, transportation, warehousing,
maintenance, planning, and others.
The USAF implements logistics at the tactical, operational and strategic levels with the Air Force
Materiel Command (AFMC) being its largest logistics focused organization. AFMC is home to
strategic organizations such as the Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC) and the Air Force Life
Cycle Management Center. Organizations such as the 635th Supply Chain Operations Wing
(SCOW), logistics readiness squadrons and aerial port squadrons implement logistics at the USAF
operational and tactical level. AFMC and the agencies it commands are the USAF's primary
interfaces for both internal and external logistics support; it interfaces with suppliers such as the
Defense Logistics Agency and General Services Administration and vendors like Boeing,
Lockheed–Martin, and Kovach Mobile Equipment.
The USAF employs a significant number of Airmen, civilian, and

Saudi Arabia’s Military: the Social Aspects of the...
Running Head: SAUDI ARABIA
Saudi Arabia's Military:
The Social Aspects of the Kingdom's Armed Forces
Introduction For a land with such a long history of military conquests, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
has a relatively short one. Strategic movements by the House of Saud in the 1800s started the birth
of the Kingdom, and the military has quickly transformed from a tribal militia to a regional super–
power. However, Saudi Arabia is not without its faults. In this paper, I will paint a brief picture of
where the Saudi military originated from and how it evolved into its current state. I will then address
significant issues with manpower in the Saudi armed forces, the most critical failure of their military
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Saudi Arabia played a key supporting role to the United States in
the Iran–Iraq War and the Persian Gulf War. Saudi forces participated in international coalitions to
protect oil interests in the Persian Gulf and to monitor hostile forces. Additionally, Saudi forces
contributed to small combat operations in the Persian Gulf War, flying over 3,000 air sorties and
deploying six army brigades. The traditional threats that Saudi Arabia was used to evolved in the
late 1990s to Islamic terrorists and unstable neighbors with the capability of employing weapons of
mass destruction, such as Iraq and Iran.
Structure of the Saudi Armed Forces Under the authority of the King, Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al–
Saud, who serves as president of the Council of Ministers, which is similar to a prime minister, the
armed forces of Saudi Arabia, of which the King is commander–in–chief, fall under the Ministry of
Defense and Aviation (Metz, 1992). The Saudi armed forces consist of the Royal Saudi Land Forces,
the Royal Saudi Naval Forces, the Royal Saudi Air Force, and the Royal Saudi Air Defense Forces.
The High Defense Council, which is similar to the National Security Council in the United States,
has the responsibility of establishing and implementing the defense policy of the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia (Noyes, 1982). Members of the High Defense Council include the King, the Minister of

Use Of Military Force Against Terrorism
In the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks, the United States government passed a series of
resolutions and acts that can be considered controversial by many. One of these resolutions is the
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists (AUMF). This resolution allows the
President "To use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons
he determines planned, authorized committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on
September 11th 2001..." (S.Res. 107–40). The resolution also mentions that it applies to those who
were harboring said terrorists. This resolution was passed one week after the attacks, and it was
passed by a resounding majority of four hundred twenty yea ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While some might say that this is not a topic that directly affects Americans, in 2011 an American
citizen was killed overseas in Yemen because of this resolution. Anwar–al–Awlaki was an American
Citizen; he was killed by a drone strike while he was visiting Yemen. It was suspected that Awlaki
was a high–ranking member of Al–Qaida, however it was never proven. The Obama administration
also fought not to release information regarding Awlaki's case in many lawsuits, claiming that they
did not need to disclose the information (Ackerman). As of 2014, no definitive proof has been given
regarding the relationship between Al–Qaida and Anwar–al–Awlaki. Another debate that stems from
this issue has to do with the possibility of a similar incident happening on our soil. Theoretically, a
US citizen, living on US soil, could be classified as a terrorist and also be killed on US soil, with the
AUMF being used as justification. One of the main concerns with the AUMF is that no trial in
necessary in order to be declared guilty, and that is where most of the controversy arose from when
it came to the killing of Anwar–al–Awlaki. While this resolution was passed fourteen years ago, its
implications are still being felt today. Another issue with the AUMF is that it is technically
unconstitutional. The Bill of Rights applies to every US citizen, but if the President presumes

War: Is Military Force Ever Justified?. War Has Become
War: Is Military Force Ever Justified? War has become a very sensitive, polarizing subject in the
past few decades. Either it's good or bad, right or wrong, black or white. Many people do not find
any justification, even though no decision is more thought out than a country's decision to use
military force. for anything war–related because of the negative reality that it is war: violent, nasty,
unyielding. All they see is an unprejudiced killing parade that rips lives apart. But what many people
fail to realize that there is some gray areas surrounding military force.There is not a definite yes or
no when it comes to war, and not all wars are choices. When it comes to national security and
keeping America safe, war is undeniably ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The press does everything it can to show pro–war propaganda, in way which shows the urgency of
issues and justifying the use of force by our brave military. The press normalizes war as a patriotic
event, and almost seems to ostracize those who do not back it, labeling them as unpatriotic. The
news outlets exaggerate issues and show war as the last and only option. So, when is war okay? For
one, when a country's borders are threatened. If a country is being invaded, there is a reason to use
military force. When a country's citizens are in danger, the country should be able to use military
force. There is an obligation for the military to protect American citizens, and that sometimes entails
using force. Fighting for our freedom, safety, and happiness is a reason to use military force.
Examples of such would include when we entered WWII after the attack on Pearl Harbor, or when
we went to war in the Middle East after 9/11 as a way to prevent further attacks on US soil. Another
reason would be if a larger, more powerful country attacks one of our allies, or even a smaller,
defenseless country. Morally, America should step in and do the right thing and help these other
countries keep their people safe. Cases like this are harder to justify, as they are not totally
necessary; however, they are are smart. Building allies and keeping relationships strong means more
protection when it comes

American Military Force Essay
Early Americans understood the necessity of powerful armed forces and citizen volunteers in times
of conflict. As the United States became a developed country, it also became apparent that a strong
military force was necessary for global trade and strategic positioning for the prevention and
possible participation in war. Strengthening America's military resulted in the United States
becoming and remaining a major world power.
Prior to the late 1800's the focus of most Americans was the fulfillment of the Manifest Destiny
through the expansion and development of their nation. Mainly, the focus was the movement to the
west, the new frontier. The spirit of the Americans who reached the Pacific Ocean was the same as
the colonists who left England ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This funding resulted in an extensive modernization program that included the 1885 establishment
of the Naval War College at Newport, Rhode Island. America's Navy had a strong corps of
professional officers, all of whom were trained in strategy and skilled in the highest levels of
warfare. Their education included the teachings of Alfred Thayer Mahan, a United States Navy
admiral and geostrategic professional who verbalized the concept of "sea power" as the greater
naval power was directly responsible for that country's greater worldwide impact. '"Whoever rules
the waves rules the world', Mahan wrote." (Young) The Navy had been actively preparing for war
since January, 1898 and was successfully able to sink or disable the entire Spanish Fleet in Manila
Bay without losing a single American life and is ultimately responsible for the successes in Cuba. In
July 1898, Regular and volunteer troops had reached the Philippines to offer support and formal
surrender ceremonies came following the Spanish government signing a peace protocol. Spain and
the United States signed the Treaty of Paris on December 10 to end the war. Spain gave up
sovereignty over Cuba and Cuba became an independent state. Puerto Rico and Guam were ceded to
the United States and Spain accepted $20 million for the Philippines. America was a colonial power
in the Far

The Polish Military Force
1– In the early 1900s, the Polish military was a force to be noticed, as they were the first country to
hold an all–Metal air force. Yet, since those days, other world powers had far surpassed the Polish
military. This was in large part due to the fact that Poland was not a very advanced and
industrialized country. Poland was more of an agricultural country and simply lacked the
industrialization and technology in order to mass–produce military weapons and resources the way
other major world powers were easily able to do. That is not to say the Polish did not have the
military technology at the time, as their weaponry was up to par if not better than many countries
involved (including Germany), they just lacked the quantity, not quality. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As the German forces continued to close the gap on the cornered Allied forces, the Allies saw the
need to evacuate these military personnel. From the initial gathering of all potential rescue ships on
May 22, 1940, multiple attempts at evacuating as many troops as possible occurred, starting on May
27, but only around 26,000 men were able to be rescued before German aircraft badly damaged the
Allied ships on May 29th. Possibly as a result of this damage dealt, Germany thought this was a
good time to allow the German infantry units to catch up to their tanks. This decision ultimately
gave the Allied forces the window of opportunity they had been praying for, as from the 29th until
June 4th, 1940, a total of 366,162 men were rescued from what had dwindled down to a 5 square
kilometer area near the beaches of De Panne. Winston Churchill would later declare this evacuation
a miracle, as had it not been for the German decision to allow the infantry to advance to the tanks
positions, many of these men would most certainly have

Military Force And Security In Iraq Essay
Something that the U.S. should do is dispatch more special operations forces and more aircraft.
Having army rangers, selected trained military intelligence units, civil affairs, etc. over to defeat the
Islamic state is going to be a lot more effective. There has to be an increase in the size of the U.S.
force. It would be a united team of logistical, intelligence, and security force. They will all be
working with the Iraqi security force. This method could have really good results but it also has its
negative. By enforcing the military force and security in Iraq specially in Mosul, it will send a
message to the people that they are not left behind. Also, the Islamic State will receive the message
loud and clear that they are about to be defeated. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another way that would be achieved is by putting people under cover. Someone in the Iraqi security
force to be able to blend in. Getting close to your enemy without being noticed and attacking when
it's least expected is the goal. A negative outcome from this method would be that the Islamic State
would start recruiting a lot more people (more than what they have now) and found a way to obtain
nuclear weapons to be able to combat with the U.S. and the Iraqis forces. Also, they would continue
to expand by committing more terrorist attacks in other parts of the world to send a loud message to
the world. Something that would be an extremely impact would be if they finally committed an
attack here in the U.S. That is a risk that we are taking by getting involved with Iraq and Isis, but
then again they are a threat and they need to be stopped. They have already said they want to attack
the U.S. but they haven't been successful. I think this method because like mentioned earlier, there
isn't much the U.S. could do other than help attack the Islamic

Military Force Development Process
In the third phase of the Army force development process, Develop organizational models, the Army
moves from an approved general design to a more specific model. The target of the phase is to meet
the gap between the general design and the identified capability requirements, identified in the
second phase of the process. In the AUSA Winter Symposium, Gen Odierno illustrates the concept
and the process of developing organizational models by discussing the need for restructuring and
reorganization the Brigade Combat Teams. The discussed process of restructuring the Brigade
Combat Teams (BCT) illustrates the third phase, the development of organizational models. In his
speech, Gen Odierno says that significant flexibility and capability

The Military Forces Who Delivered Exemplary Performance
(Challenge Coins)
Custom coins were primarily used to reward members of the military forces who delivered
exemplary performance. This small coin features the organization's distinctive logo. Members carry
it as a proof of their membership.
The use of Challenge coins started during the World War I where all members of the United States
Navy Force, the Flying Squadron received bronze coins. History shows that one of their pilots
successfully escapes captivity from the German troops. He fled to France, where they accused him
of being a spy and sentenced him to death. The French forces were able to verify his identity
through his bronze coin and saved him from the execution.
Thereafter, the members of the armed forces created the medallion challenge. If a member cannot
present his coin, he needs to pay a drink for the challenger.
Nowadays, custom coins still serve as a symbol of camaraderie and solidarity among unit members.
Its popularity extends to various organizations such as the fire department, police units, school
clubs, weddings and many others. Customized coins feature unique elements distinct to the
organization.
Challenge coins are special coins containing inscription of the name and emblem of the
organization. People with significant accomplishments acquire special coins as a form of
recognition.
For the military forces, custom coins are prized possessions. Fellow soldiers ensure that they take
home the military coins of killed or wounded members. It is a great

Faith In The Military Force
The Air Force represents one of the military branches. The Air Force also represents protection,
integrity, and excellence with a mission to fly, fight, and win in air, space, and cyberspace. The
Armed Forces represent category 1 because they are a big part of my family and The United States
of America. My dad and my grandpa both served in The Air Force. Not only did my grandpa serve
in The Air Force but in the Army too! They are both combat veterans (served in a war). My great,
great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandpa served in the
same war as General George Washington which is the Revolutionary War (in the Army). The Air
Force/Armed Forces also represent category number 2 because The Air Force/Armed Forces will
benefit society after I am gone. The Air Force/Armed Forces are significant enough to pass on to the
next generation because they protect us from our enemies on land, in the air, in the sea, and in space.
Without any of the military branches including The Air Force there most likely wouldn't be the
United States of America. If there was one it would be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Faith represents more than hope or comfort but helps us believe in things we can not see. Faith
represents this category because in order to pass on faith you must pass on bibles, Torahs, Korans,
and other written forms of the words of God or Lord. It is significant to pass down faith onto the
next generation because faith gives us something to believe that things will turn out right for us no
matter what the situation is. Faith helps us discover who we are, face difficult situations, and gives
us a path to solve problems. Without faith, people wouldn't have anything to believe in and would
make battling through hard times nearly impossible for many since faith helps many people get over
things such as death. So, it is significant to pass on faith to the next

Essay On Military Security Force
United States Air Force Security Forces: The Unites States Air Force is a huge organization that
employs a huge workforce annually who works as its security forces. The organization's mission is
to fly, fight, and win all battles in the air, cyberspace, and air. As a huge organization, it acts as one
of the most attractive options for individuals who are seriously considering a career with the security
forces. However, such individuals should conduct an adequate research before choosing to seek for
job opportunities with the organization. This is largely because individual responsibilities in the
United States Air Force contain various risks that are associated with different jobs. One of the most
dangerous jobs at the United States Air Force is Outside the Wire Patrolling which is normally
geared towards securing base. In most cases, these jobs include combating offensive ground combat
operations while taking the fight to the enemy, which is not an easy task. The main goal of Outside
the Wire Patrolling is to drive the enemy out while conducting these operations. As the security
forces carry out Outside the Wire patrol, they usually experience numerous fatal attacks from their
enemies. Within the U.S. Air Force, there is an enlisted personnel and team of armed forces that are
commonly known as Tactical Air Control Party that supports the conventional and/or special
operations. The risks associated with outside–the–wire patrols is the likely counter attack from the

Argumentative Essay: Women In The Military Force
Women in Combat
Odierno states, "If you can meet the standards we've established, then you should be able to perform
in that position, and that's where we are headed." In other words, Odierno asserts that even though
you are a woman and want to go into the armed combat forces, if you can meet the standards that
have been established you are more than likely able to get into the combat position you would like.
Despite the fact that women should stay at home and fulfill their family needs, women have the right
to choose whether or not to be in military forces because standards can be met and gender is nothing
but an immutable characteristic.
Women are the caretakers, the nurturers, and the one's that make a house a home. It has been that
way ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people disagree with women joining combat forces because they think that women are the
weaker sex. As stated by Captain Katie, US Marine corps, in the article, "WOMEN IN COMBAT
PROS AND CONS", "The standards of physical fitness have been set to suit men, and women
attempting to reach them will over–stretch themselves...Women serving in integrated units will
suffer higher injury rates as a result of this" (1). Meaning that men in combat deeply believe that
women are not suited to meet combat standards. In spite of the beliefs of many, women have proved
that it is possible to accommodate with training. Women can avoid female injury rates by extra pre–
training for muscle building. According to the article, "Army Ranger School's Assessment of
women", Commander Lamothe states, "Eight of the initial 19 women made it through the initial
Ranger Assessment Phase...the women were joined by 156 male soldiers who training in the
mountains..." (2). This example shows that women are capable to meet standards, they just need
official military support to get there. Allowing a mixed gender force may keep the military strong. It
will only join the capability of taking down the opponent. In addition, it will double the talent pool
for sensitive jobs that require interpersonal skills that not just anyone can have. Women are no
stronger than men, they both have strengths and that is what allows them to be in the military
positions they are in. The changing nature of modern warfare and the critical role that women have
played, led to a historic policy changer. SWAN is a service network that supports the women in
combat policy. "SWAN believes that the most effective military is one that integrates women into all
sectors"

British Military Force Analysis
The sheer supremacy of the British military force was more than capable of expeditiously
suppressing an amateur rebellion and successfully restoring the insurgent colonies to their innate
allegiance. Until Washington finally adopted a defensive strategy at the fortress of Harlem Heights,
the British undoubtedly had a significant military leverage over the Americans; therefore, if Lord
Germain's [Germain] strategy were properly employed, the British should have won. Germain
informed General William Howe [Howe], and subsequently General Henry Clinton [Clinton], of his
plan in which "a decisive blow had to be delivered" before any reconciliation so that the
"overwhelming force" would shock "the rebels into recognizing the futility of their cause." ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The only reason the Continental Army was spared was because of Howe's secret "hopes of
negotiating a peaceful end to the rebellion." He was also so sure of the fact that "British victory was
inevitable, which in turn meant that a more limited strategy was wholly adequate." By delaying the
process of suppression, the Continental Army gradually gained experience and courage. Washington
also learned from his mistakes in the Battle of New York and ignored his "aggressive military
instincts;" he eventually put aside his "honor–driven character" to adopt a new attitude towards his
definition of a victory. "Though it ran counter to all his instincts, he now realized that his goal was
not to win the war but rather not to lose it," and thus he embraced a defensive strategy in the fortress
of Harlem Heights. However, before this pivotal moment in history, Howe could have and probably
should have listened to Clinton in targeting the Continental Army at King's Bridge." However,
"Howe wanted his American campaign to be a more measured affair," meaning he could have put an
early end to the Continental Army, but chose not to in order to remain civilized and reduce

Military Doctrine Defines Logistics As The Science Of...
Military doctrine defines logistics as 'the science of planning and carrying out the movement and
maintenance of forces'.1 Logistics is the applied art of moving armies and providing for the
provision of support to keep that army moving or in location. It is a continuous and never ending
operation. For the purposes of this paper it may be taken that a focus on the art of sustainment – that
is, the actual process of maintaining an army during operations, with a smaller focus on the
administrative side. Some parts of the administration side will not be looked at in this paper, these
include record keeping, discipline and medical provision. In this paper, however, I shall be
concentrating on what the major logistical issues confronting ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
What was the available transport by land, river or sea? What was the length, security and nature of
communication lines? However, this biggest questions were concerned with the welfare of the
soldier, what were they going to eat? What weapons were available? How were they going to be
cared for? These were the questions that if not dealt with appropriately would rapidly decrease the
effectiveness of the army.1
First of all, the most important part of logistics, the sustenance and hydration of the soldiers needs to
be considered. In short what were they going to eat and drink throughout the campaign? The
methods changed quite notably throughout the time period, this having some relationship to the size
of armies, although this will be covered at a later time. The first method of both feeding the army
and drawing the enemy from their fortifications was the chevauchee, essentially an armed raid,
typified by pillage, burning, rape and murder, essentially destroying everything in its path. An
example of this would be Edward III, who ravaged France, both surviving in enemy territory and
also compelling Phillip to fight in open combat. The chevauchee can be seen as an effective form of
feeding small armies, however any great army would have trouble acquiring the sheer amount
necessary for its survival.
Following the decline of the chevauchee and an increase in army

The Use Of The Armed Forces Is Determined By National...
The use of the armed forces is determined by national military strategy. An important role in the
implementation of the national military strategy in U.S. played airpower. The versatility, speed,
range, high maneuverability, and advanced technology are the distinctive proprieties of operational
and strategic airpower. Over the past 70 years, the entire notion about airpower has met a massive
change in modern warfare. Airpower has evolved into a fighting force with the same rights as other
branches of military power. Even more, the airpower demonstrate during the regional wars since the
beginning 1960 that it became an essential element in planning and conducting a military operation
in order to achieve political objective with minimum loss of human life, and with maximum
effectiveness. Since the beginning of the 1960s, the effectiveness of airpower in military operations
became unquestionable because of its ability to deliver reconnaissance data that is essential for
preparation of battlefield, using high technological munitions that increased accuracy and firepower,
and its airlift capability for rapid project of military power and maintaining the combat readiness in
any corner of the globe.
One of distinction of airpower mission in which it shows high effectiveness is to prepare the
battlefield for future operations that could consist in further action of ground and navy forces in
order to obtain the proposed outcome. One of the main requirements for preparing the

Military Force Justified Research Paper
Imagine a war. It doesn't matter which war, because all of them have several things in common.
Wars are very costly. They have cost thousands to millions of dollars in equipment, and all wars
have cost hundreds, thousands, or even millions of lives, both in the military and in the innocent
population. Those who do survive are scarred, sometimes physically, mentally, and emotionally.
Many retired soldiers suffer from PTSD, or post–traumatic stress disorder, as well as severe or fatal
injuries. There are very, very few who would want to go to war, but sometimes, war is necessary.
The question is: when is military force justified? Military force is justified when the safety of our
population is threatened, when one of our allies is threatened, and when other, more peaceful
attempts have been ineffective. Military force should be used as a defense, both to our population
and for our allies. In December ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Commenting on Michael Gonchar's article, "When is the Use of Military Force Justified?', Alondra
(no last name given) states:
" Guns are not a form of power, only a form of destruction. Although, sometimes, destroying
something is the only way to have peace. Military Force is justified to be used after discussion isn't
effective. An overlooked problem today is that are Military Force is being used causally, rather than
using it as the absolutely only option for peace. Peace and force contradict each other, which is why
using force to gain peace should not be used as such an impromptu act." (Gonchar)
Many wars are fought to find peace, but war is its opposite. If there is a peaceful way to find peace,
then that way should be used. War leaves scars, both physical and mental, on those who fight. If
there is a peaceful way, then there is no reason for members of the military to sacrifice so much. But
if there is no peaceful way, then military force can be justified and used as a last

Impact On The Military Force Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Erika Nelson

More from Erika Nelson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Impact On The Military Force Essay