Presidential Election Debates TV Role Critique

Presidential Elections Dbq
Television is an important educational tool in society, however, it does not have a place in
presidential elections, due to the inequality and lack of substantive discussion in televised debates,
as well as irrelevant physical standards being placed upon presidential candidates. Journalists agree
that political debates are an ineffective method for deciding the leader of the country, and they are
not worth the use of television resources. Should the decision of who is in charge of a massive
country be made based on physical appearances, such as height, hairstyle and other superficial
traits? Using these methods of deduction to decide an elected official is extremely unintelligent and
ineffective compared to the alternative, an intelligent interview printed in an article or magazine.
Citizens of a society are incredibly resistant to change, but examining journalists' opinions and
articles proves that a significant change must be made. The lack of substantive discussion in
televised presidential debates largely contributes to the negative effect television has had on
presidential elections. Many ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Television should be used for useful and informative programming, which is the complete opposite
of an interview with Bill Clinton in 1992, in which Clinton discusses, among other topics, his
"underwear with the American people", therefore clearly providing an example of the ineffective
and off–topic discussions that occur on television (Source B). Conversations such as this interview,
although slightly humorous, provide absolutely no information about a candidate's policy positions
or planned actions if elected. The members of a society, whether they decide to vote or not, should
be fully informed on these topics. Television is not providing an ample source for information due to
the irrelevance of the discussions and the lack of substantial information
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Presidential Election Winner
Presidential Election Winner
The 2016 presidential election was one of the most controversial elections to have ever faced the
American people. Both major political parties ran on completely opposite platforms which caused
the American people to be divided more than ever on policies and beliefs. In fact, the outcome of the
election took the media, the American people and the world by surprise. This only divided the
American people even further. The Democrats were certain that their candidate, Hillary Clinton, was
to be the winner over Donald Trump. History though proved everyone otherwise with the loss of
Hillary Clinton. Many analysts claim that the Democrats' loss of the presidency was due to FBI
director, James Comey's letter, the media's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, from the very first day, Post–ABC polling found that a majority of respondents didn't
think Trump was qualified to be president. (Bump). The problem is, that didn't keep people from
voting for him. In national exit polling conducted after the election, 6–in–10 voters said they didn't
think Trump was qualified to be president. And yet one–fifth of those voters voted for him anyway.
This only reinforces the fact that Clinton was not able to connect with the typical Democratic
constituents. If nearly 1–in–5 voters accepted Clinton's core argument about Trump but voted for
him anyway then Clinton's campaign was in deep trouble before Comey did anything. Whether or
not Comey's letters was the deciding factor of the election isn't clear. What's clear is that "Comey
provides an easy excuse, deservedly or not"

Presidential Election Advantages
I believe that the US Presidential election should deserve all the media attention it is receiving
because the USA is one of the strongest world economies and will have a massive influence on other
country's economies. The US politics are known to be very complex. Even though we're inundated
with the media coverage of this election, it can still be difficult to figure out what exactly is
happening. In 2014 it was stated that more and more americans are using cell phones to follow
political news with 28 percent of registered voters. In other words, people are following election
news and development in which this can help them understand more of the US politics from looking
at social media sites and blogs. As every economic situation in the world

The Election Of Presidential Election
As election season draws closer, we see the candidates debate more and more. These debates are a
huge part in the elections, but, there is another debate that has had the hot seat since the 2000
election of Gore and Bush. In 2000, Democratic candidate Al Gore won the popular vote across the
United States, but, more controversy was created by the Republican candidate George W. Bush
winning the presidential election because he surpassed the 270 electoral votes needed to win. An
outcry arose from all across the country saying that the people's voices are not heard through the
Electoral College and that a true democratic country would allow for direct election of the President.
So why did the founding fathers not allow a direct election? And why hasn't the Electoral College
been reformed yet if it is so bad? The answers are simple. Our founding fathers didn't allow for a
direct election because they were afraid that the voters would be not well enough informed about the
candidates, a reform to the Electoral College would mean a new amendment to the constitution, and
because in all actuality, the Electoral College helps keep little states involved with the elections.
With today's technology and social media, the way candidates can reach voters far surpass that of
how candidates had to reach voters in the 19th century. So more voters should be better informed
than that of voters in the 19th century; right? Although this is a very true statement and that the
information about

Presidential Elections : Presidential Election
Over the past seven decades, this nation's voter turnout has been dismal. The presidential election in
2012 had a voter turnout of about 57.5%. That means a little over half of the voter population did
not voice their opinion on who should be the nation's president for the next four years in the voting
booth. If this continues, there will be a president whom the general public may not want but could
have prevented if all they did was vote. However, the upcoming presidential election seems to be
different from previous elections just due to the massive amount of attention it is receiving in the
media. Fox news had their largest viewer turnout when airing the republican debate, hitting a record
of nearly 24 million viewers and the same goes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He has expressed his beliefs on improving the middle class and disempowering the influence
corporate America has in politics. The American people have seen this and it shows in the polls as
well as the donations Bernie receives. His campaign is funded by the American people and is not
funded by the billionaire class like other presidential candidates.
Bernie was invited to hold a convocation at Liberty University, a conservative university that is
normally visited by Republicans who share the similar views to the students. During the event, he
states: "It is very easy for a candidate to speak to people who hold the same views. It's harder but
important to reach out to others who look at the world differently." This is the type of attitude that is
required for a president, or arguably any person in life, since not everyone in the world will hold the
same viewpoint as you. It is through discussing each person's view that some common ground can
be made and only then can progress can be made on the issues that matter.
In 1962, Bernie Sanders was arrested for protesting segregation in public schools when he attended
the University of Chicago. That was only the beginning of his fight against racial inequality in
America and addresses this issue in four fields: physical, political, legal, and economic. One of the
biggest issues outlined in this field is the level of incarceration this nation faces,

2012 Presidential Elections
The results of both the 2004 and 2012 Presidential elections were the same as both incumbents were
able to capitalize on the voters being comfortable with them. Additional, since both incumbents had
access to national assets, four years of on the job training, and "insider information" they were able
to speak in–depth on a wide range of issues both foreign and domestic. In 2004, the largest and most
important issue to the nation was the war in Iraqi and in 2012 it was the nation's economy. Given the
incumbents access to firsthand information on the issues at large, they were able to weaken their
opponents in the nation's eyes by dismantling the candidate's strategies on the issues. History has
shown that nations trend to focus more on domestic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Campaign Strategies used by the incumbents in both the 2004 and 2012 presidential elections were
direct and aggressive, using media outlets to launch phased targeting to discredit candidates by
highlighting indecisiveness and lacking of understand on controversial issues. In both elections the
candidates that successful used the media were able to garnered support from nation as they were
able to stay steps ahead of their opponents, forcing them to constantly defend themselves and
legalize their campaigns. For example, President Obama used ads to undermine Mitt Romney's time
running the investment firm Bain Capital (strength of Romney's campaign) against him, stating that
because of Mitt Romney's time at Bain he would be unable to relate to average. This forced Romney
to alter his campaign strategy as more Americans began to question Romney stance on multiple
issues, especially taxes, during an election in which the primary issue was the nation's economy.
Similar strategies were utilized in the 2004 and 2012 elections, giving the incumbents a huge
advantage from day one. When you combine the election results and campaign strategy with the
voter turnout with only a 2–5 percent difference in voting age population turnout, it is clear why
both elections resulted in the incumbent being reelected. I believe that the nation applied the old
saying, "if it is not broke, then don't fix it" during both the 2004 and 2012 presidential

The 1960 Presidential Election
Kennedy is generally considered to have won the national popular vote by 112,827, a margin of
0.17% (although the unusual nature of the election in Alabama has caused some to question this
figure)[2] and though Nixon carried more individual states (26 to 22),[3] Kennedy won a 303 to 219
Electoral College victory.
The 1960 presidential election was the closest election since 1916, which can be explained by a
number of factors.[4] Kennedy benefited from the economic recession of 1957–58, which hurt the
standing of the incumbent Republican Party, and he had the advantage of 17 million more registered
Democrats than Republicans.[5] Furthermore, the new votes that Kennedy, the first Roman Catholic
president, gained among Catholics almost neutralized

The Importance Of Presidential Elections
The most important and popularized moment in American Political verve is the presidential election
process. As Nathan Myhrvold once said, "Elections, for their part, are typically popularity contests
rather than measures of candidates' relative competency or effectiveness. Imagine if scientific truth
were determined according to which scientist was most popular. To be successful, scientists would
have to be charismatic and attractive – and human knowledge would suffer terribly". Because
politics are so far from the average American Joe, the virtue of elections has lost its way into a high
school class election where the jock wins over the head cheerleader. Evidently, Americans are now
encouraged if not obliged to take part of a natural right, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
. . did not fairly represent the views of the party members throughout the nation" (Text, 393). This
was when the people began to take note that this process was unfair and that they should add a step
so that everyone was at least content with the nominees. The State's party leaders would generally
decide who would be selected. The role of the political party conventions, as demonstrated in both
the 2012 and 2016 elections, demonstrated a close merger between both candidates' votes,
nonetheless the electoral votes were more significant for Barack Obama. As the same story told for
Donald Trump, however he had a greater gap of indifference of the general population due to his
shameful campaign. Money is a huge deal when it comes to campaigns. We all have received that
one annoying call, where someone is trying to persuade you to demonstrate support (monetary
because moral support isn't what pays the bills) for a specific candidate. For the most part, they
occupy this money for TV commercials, or traveling expenses, maybe even a speech writer because
they hated English in college. Candidates, or their teams, take careful inspection of their expenses
because money does not grow on trees and they are again trying to persuade America that they are
good enough to become

The Presidential Election Of 2016
Introduction During the US presidential election of 2016, the world has witnessed an abundance of
unprecedented phenomena. From the nomination of the first woman candidate from a major political
party to the nomination of first billionaire reality TV star, the election cycle has produced moments
that would have been unimaginable a year or two ago. While the media is gleeful to cover the
horserace aspect of the election, the question that political scientists are interested is what factors
motivates American voters to prefer one candidate over another. Political pundits from both sides
have cited identity politics, the personal characters of the candidates and the national and personal
economic conditions to support or oppose Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. The personal qualities
of Trump and Clinton made them most unpopular presidential nominees of the modern era. Both
candidates have alienated different groups of voters while attracting others. Both of them have
proposed two distinct paths for America 's future with different fiscal, domestic and international
policies. When making their decision, the voters are evaluating all of these factors to choose the best
match candidate for them. Like any other political phenomenon, voting intentions in this election
have multiple agents, but I will argue that while group identities, the economics and the qualities of
the candidates all influences voters' intentions, the economic interest of a person has the best
correlation with

Presidential Election : Presidential Debates
In order to determine the best candidate to be our national leader, it is imperative that citizens watch
the broadcasted presidential debates before casting their ballots. These debates give each
representative of the two most influential political parties, the Democrats and Republicans, time to
demonstrate their contrasting viewpoints, and otherwise allow the voter to understand each
candidate's personality. During our psychology class this semester, we were privileged to write
essays on the three presidential debates between Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, and
Republican nominee, Donald Trump. In order to succeed in this task, it was imperative that we
incorporate psychology terms in conjunction with the candidates; only now can we reveal our
informed opinions about the results of this 2016 Presidential Election. During the three presidential
debates, I tried to watch Hillary Clinton unbiased, as I admittedly wanted her to become our
president. Overall, I found Clinton to be mature, and to be overwhelmingly habituated to Trump's
condescending comments. Despite Trump's disrespectful remarks regarding women and other
minorities, Clinton was calm, and simply spoke to the viewers regarding his rhetoric. Her peaceful
demeanor demonstrated habituation in that, although Trump can become very offensive, she chose
to rise above the trying stimulus he displayed, and ultimately appeared to be the better candidate for
presidential office. In response to audience phobias

2016 Presidential Election
Many American's were surprised with the results of the 2016 Presidential Election. With Clinton
predicted to win with more than seventy percent of the votes, so many Americans were upset or
troubled to wake up to Donald Trump as their new president–elect. After the results of the election,
violence has broken out throughout the country, mainly targeted at minorities. With the country in an
uproar, one may think, how does this sort of situation happen? One could blame the media for this
lack of information or surprise outcome of the election. The media has changed this election from
the way we view our candidates to who we predicted to win through social media, journalistic bias
and people's internal filter.
Social media affected the preexisting ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The 2016 election has been the first election where social media has been a key player to how
people got their information. Statistics say "44 percent of American adults said they had learned
something new in the past week about the election from social media." However, with social media
such an important influence on the younger generation it is important for all of this information to
be legitimate and truthful. Google and Facebook have recently changed their policies to try to stop
fake news articles from popping up within their ad space. The spread of fake news articles skews the
public's perception of the candidates. The guardian talks about how the American voter is not just
one demographic (college educated individuals, white men, minorities etc. ) because of this lack of
(straightforward), it's hard to get an accurate prediction on who would have won the election.
Additionally, the media affected the election negatively because they did not give the general public
enough information to understand the statistics that they were

The presidential election of 1912 was fought amongst four major candidates. Woodrow Wilson was
brought up by his father, a Presbyterian minister, and his mother, daughter of a Presbyterian minister
brought up Woodrow Wilson. He was president of Princeton University and governor of New Jersey.
He represented the Democratic Party and had a combination of high morality and high–minded
detachment. Eugene Debs was a well–known Socialist and union man for the Fireman's
Brotherhood and American Railroad. He was never interested in the complex economic and political
theories but in the dignity and humanity of the average worker. Another candidate was Theodore
Roosevelt who revolted from the Republican Party and helped form and led the Progressive Party.
He was brought up by a moderately wealthy family and ended up being governor of New York. Our
final candidate was William Howard Taft who's "first love was always the law, and his highest
aspiration to serve as chief justice, not as president" and a close friend to Theodore Roosevelt. Taft
was also representing the Republican Party. One issue that would have been important to me if I
were a voter in 1912 would have been Women's Suffrage. Many men and women believed that men
were "fundamentally different" and that women should stay out of politics because its just a "man's
world". Others argued that it was time for women to come out of the shadows of men and prove that
they, too, can help their country and other residents with

Presidential Election Is Unprecedented
The upcoming Presidential Election is unlike any other. Two very different candidates with widely
disparate political experience and personalities square off against each other in a bitter, contentious
battle. Neither candidate seems very popular or likeable, yet one of them will be sworn in as
President of the United States come January. In many ways this presidential election is
unprecedented. The candidates from both parties are perceived as extremely unfavorable. And, while
the establishment candidate Hillary Clinton currently leads the race, more recent polls show that her
lead over her outsider opponent, reality television star and real estate magnate Donald Trump, is
weakening. What is not unprecedented about this election, however,

Presidential Election Results
How Did Pollsters Get It Wrong?
On last November 8th, the results of presidential election were a surprise and shock to most people
around the world, especially US residents because they consistently projected Hillary Clinton would
defeated Donald Trump. According to the article "Presidential Election Results: Donald J. Trump
Wins" in The New York Times, the total votes for Clinton were 62,391,335 (48%) and for Trump
were 61,125,956 (47%). However, in contrast to earlier predictions, some states elected to Trump
instead of Clinton, and this result brought victory for Trump in the last hours of election day. In
details, Trump had 6 electoral votes from Iowa, 10 electoral votes from Wisconsin, 18 electoral
votes from Ohio, 20 electoral votes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"There is a great deal of speculation but no clear answers as to the cause of the disconnect, but there
is one point of agreement: Across the board, polls underestimated Trump's level of support.", said
Andrew Mercer, Claudia Deane and Kyley McGeeney authors on their article "Why 2016 election
polls missed their mark" in Pew Research Center. They also gave some several possible
explanations for the misstep. The first factor might be what pollsters refer to as nonresponse bias.
"Some groups, include the less educated voters who were a key demographic for Trump on Election
Day, are consistently hard for pollsters to reach." Then, the result would be a strongly pro–Trump
segment of the population that simply did not show up in the polls in proportion to their actual share
of the population. The next factor was many of those who were polled simply were not honest about
whom they intended to vote for. The explanation for this factor was "support for Trump was socially
undesirable, and that his supporters were unwilling to admit their support to pollsters". In 1982, a
similar case occurred in the gubernatorial election in California. Democrat Tom Bradley, the black
mayor of Los Angeles, lost to Republican George Deukmejian despite having been ahead in the
polls even though the voters were reluctant to tell interviewers that they were not going to vote for a
black candidate. The third factor "involves the way pollsters identify likely voters. Because we can't
know in advance who is actually going to vote, pollsters develop models predicting who is going to
vote and what the electorate will look like on Election Day." This is a notoriously difficult task, and
small differences in assumptions can produce sizable differences in election

Twitter In Presidential Elections
The introduction of media has significantly impacted the way candidates campaign during the
United States presidential debate cycles. While mainstream media outlets (i.e. televised newscasts,
radio broadcasts) have played an important role in providing live coverage of events in which
candidates spoke about their platforms, the purpose of the media was completely altered with the
introduction of social media, specifically Twitter. While journalism was meant to be an unbiased
practice, Twitter and other social media sites have taken on the role of a biased news source, forever
changing presidential elections in the process.
Founded in 2006, Twitter quickly became a prominent figure in the social media sphere, boasting
more than 310 million ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While there has been a lot of negative feedback from the results of the election, both campaigns
should see social media platforms, particularly Twitter, as a catalyst for future change. The use of
social media during the 2016 election has granted several candidates, not just the major party
candidates, plenty of media exposure to a differentiated group of voters. Additionally, social media
grants candidates more time to directly communicate with voters on issues that they are particularly
passionate about. Furthermore, candidates have the opportunity to use feedback from social media
sites to predict future winners of the popular vote well before the election. The millennial
demographic has not held back with their opinions on issues and the results of the election;
therefore, candidates and their campaign teams should take social media and the information it
provides into serious consideration when partaking in such large–scale

The 1860 Presidential Election
How do you think the presidential election is going this year? Many people seem to think that this
presidential election is a heated and controversial debate between the Republican and Democratic
Party. Some seem to think that as a nation we have never had such contention in an election and that
we will never be able to recover from such damage that this election will cause. But history tends to
repeat itself in our nation; for example, some of our past elections have caused fear in citizens' eyes
just like this election has done. An example of this is, the presidential election of 1800 between
Thomas Jefferson and James Adams, this election caused great worry during that time period.
Another election that worried our country deeply was the presidential election of 1860 between
Abraham Lincoln and John Breckinridge this election caused our great nation to be divided. Another
similarity that both these presidential elections have had, is that at the end of each election the
American people have put their political views aside, and united ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He goes on to explain that both the candidates are untrustworthy in their campaign. Although the
mass majority of what Glenn Beck say about each the candidates is negative, he does say a few
positive things about both of these candidates that I will later explain in the paper. Currently at this
point, in the presidential election, Glenn Beck has not officially endorsed any of the running
candidates, but he has given his opinion on each one of them. He has described each of the
candidate's strengths and weakness during the Presidential Debate. He also states on the website and
goes into great depth on his opinion on each of their policies for office, and how he thinks each of
the candidates it will affect America in the future if they become the

Presidential Elections : The Presidential Election
The 2016 Presidential Election has been one of the most bewildering experiences of my lifetime, but
also, possibly the most telling event of where the average American voter's values lie and the extent
of our social progression. Personally, I, like many political scientists, educated scholars, politicians,
celebrity figures, stand–up comics, preteens on twitter, optimists, and the entirely of the modern
liberal media, truly believed Hillary Clinton would become our 45th, and 1st woman, president, but
that did not seem to be the case. Donald J. Trump has won the 2016 Presidential Election, and I
think i speak for all of us when I say: I am stoked. This shocking turn of events, which seems to
defy political polls, statistical analysis, historical and governmental patterns, mathematics, and,
frankly, common sense, has deemed my hypothesis to be incorrect, and like Hillary Clinton
conceded the election, I concede my prediction, but as clearly demonstrated, not my opinion. I
digress; the results of this election have reasoning behind them. Donald Trump won with 290
electoral votes in comparison with Hillary's 232 votes, even thought Hillary won the popular vote
(47.9% to 47.1%). 55.4% of eligible voters participated in this year's election, with 26.5% of eligible
voters siding with Hillary and 26.3% voting for Trump. The voter turnout this year has fallen in
correspondence with the last two decades in regards to presidential election; a significant amount of
Americans abstained

The United States presidential election of 1984 was the 50th quadrennial presidential election. It
was held on Tuesday, November 6, 1984. The presidential race was between the incumbent
Republican candidate, President Ronald Reagan, and former Vice President Democratic candidate,
Walter Mondale. Reagan was helped in the election by a strong economic recovery from the deep
recession of 1981–1982. Reagan carried 49 of the 50 states, becoming only the second presidential
candidate to do so after Richard Nixon 's victory in the 1972 presidential election. Mondale 's only
electoral votes came from the District of Columbia, which has always been considered a Democratic
guarantee, and his home state of Minnesota–which he won by a mere 3761 votes, meaning Reagan
came within 3800 votes of winning all fifty states. Reagan 's 525 electoral votes (out of 538) is the
highest total ever received by a presidential candidate. Mondale 's 13 electoral votes is also the 2nd–
fewest ever received by a second–place candidate, second only to lf Landon 's 8 in 1936. In the
national popular vote, Reagan received 58.8% to Mondale 's 40.6% (2016, 270towin.com)
For a long period, candidates running for President of the United States often have what's called a
campaign strategy to help attract voters' attention. The more voters they attracted, more likely those
voters would choose them as their president elect. Technology has played a key role in doing that for
past elections and current ones. During

Lack Of Funding For Presidential Elections
With the upcoming presidential election, it has been interesting to learn about things as they are
actually happening in our country today. Among the many issues that surround the race to the office,
financing the presidential election seems to be a major topic that is always in the public eye. There
are many different views on how the election should be financed but it is hard to tell how far
government funding and donations can go before democracy is left behind.
After President Nixon and the Watergate controversy in 1971, the United States began to put limits
on how much a candidate could receive and spend within a campaign. In order to enforce fairness
between candidates, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rather than government providing millions of dollars for the campaign and putting harsh restricts on
individual donations, I believe that the limits should not be put on the American people but on the
candidates themselves. Spending on the campaign has gotten out of control within the last decade.
Millions of taxpayer dollars are being spend on mobile campaigns, advertisements, and media
exposure. This funding could easily go towards other areas of society, benefiting the very people
that the candidates wish to govern. Rather than directing negative attention, I believe that candidates
should reach out to the public to gain support. Campaigning for presidency should not be about
winning or who raises the most money. Presidency should be about protecting and caring for the
American people. The conduct of campaigns should be monitored in order to limit spending and to
prevent negative advertising towards opposite candidates.
Candidates running for office should depend less on government funding and turn towards the
public for their support. Rather then concerning ourselves with prohibiting the use of soft money we
should control the amount of taxpayers' dollars that are being spent. How can we claim that the use
of soft money goes against Democracy when we allow our government to fund

Manipulation In Presidential Elections
If voters were to review past presidential candidates' advertisements, they would be guaranteed to
come across instances where someone's words were twisted and turned against them by their
opposing party. This is a classic use of manipulation to make oneself appear to be the "good–guy."
Hence, it is not surprising that this has not changed in the 2016 election. However, what has
changed is that there is a woman running for president–she's cunning, but her arguments are
distorted. With clips of girls evaluating their figures while playing interviews with harsh words,
Clinton asks, "Is this the president we want for our daughters?" In one of her new ads, "Mirrors,"
Hillary Clinton follows suit and manipulates potential voters into a prejudiced opinion of Donald
Trump by taking his words out of context to exploit him.
In light of election day soon approaching, Clinton releases a critical advertisement to air in
undecided states: the ad uses juxtaposition to craft an unflattering idea of Trump in her attempt to
sway voters towards the Democratic party. The advertisement is composed of snippets of girls of all
ages, ethnicities, and builds analyzing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Lusher quotes past interviews with Trump giving less–than–respectable remarks about
specific women such as: "fat" and "ugly" about Rosie O'Donnell, as well as, "She's a slob. She ate
like a pig." However, Clinton does not include specific names of who Trump was talking about,
implying that his words are a general idea of women. Though, it becomes clear that the origin of
these statements had nothing to do with women as a general populace, if voters do their research.
Which is something Clinton assumes voters will not do, hence underestimating their intelligence.
Nonetheless, the Democratic candidate is relying on her schemes to mold a crooked idea of Trump
for impending voters to gain

Presidential Election Vs. Presidential Elections
As we approach the final day of the US election, polls show vantage for Clinton, the representative
of the democrat party over Trump, the representative of the republic party so far. FiveThirtyEight,
Nate Silver 's predictions and polling data for the 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton
and Donald Trump, tells, 49.2% of the popular vote goes for Clinton and 44.5% of the popular vote
goes for Trump. These popular votes conducted in November 2, 2016. Clinton and Trump are the
only candidates who remained in the race in the final stages representing their parties after the other
candidates lost chances in competition. They have completed all the three presidential election
debates and they are about 1 week away from the final day of the US election. There are few states
remained undecided about the future president. The undecided and changing states are the ones
which will determine the wining candidate in the final day of the elections. My prediction for the US
election result is that Clinton is going to win the race. The factors shape the election results are the
campaign events, tactics and the media influence. In this paper, I am going to discuss how these two
factors are contributing in Clinton campaign then I will propose a strategy for Trump to help him
wining the race. Both candidates had different career route and political life. ("Hillary ...") Clinton
earned a low degree. She served as a first lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. She also

The Presidential Election Elections Election
In the 2000 United States Presidential election, the close pre–election polls showed the election
could be won by either the Republican or the Democrat Party. Both Parties had two strong
candidates, with a handful of other third party candidates, including Green Party and Reform Party
representatives. As I watched the results of the 2000 presidential election, I felt bad for Vice
President Albert Gore, Jr. The Presidency seemed to be well within Governor George W. Bush's
grasp. The television news networks were showing a big lead for Bush across the country. I turned
the television off in my office, and I advised my Soldiers to get back to work. My Soldiers and I
were stationed overseas in the Republic of Korea. We were thirteen hours ahead of the Eastern Time
zone in the United States. We worked for the Commanding General for all United States Troops in
Korea. The General often spoke about the election, but never let on which candidate got his vote.
When I turned on the news at home that same evening, I was shocked to learn the presidency had
not been decided. It seemed Gore rebounded across the country; however the total vote count in
some states is too close to call. The 2000 Presidential election was important to me because the last
time a Bush was in office, I found myself overseas as a part of a Multinational Coalition as the
United States had declared war on the country of Iraq. In the year 2000, the peninsula of Korea had
been in a delicate state with

U.s. Presidential Election Elections Essay
In due course of the most recent decade, there has been a significant surge in American independent
voters. It is of verifiable significance to put into thought the effects of these voters, especially, since
the United States (U.S.) currently undergone its ' eagerly awaited 2016 Presidential General
Election. It is with relevance to presidential elections that we have seen a political surge on
American independent voters and thus having political candidates attempt to sway their view, we
have seen fundamental compelling percentages on these election outcomes.
This case study crafts the breakdown of potential variables that have prompted to the sharp ascent in
American independent voters in previous political history, and the voting behavior to authentic
elements adding to Independent voters ' decisions. Specifically, to what extent do factors shape the
voting behavior on the increasing rise of the American Independent voter choice and voter turnout in
the 2016 United States Presidential Election? By extension, how do independents differ in part from
the two major partisan ties of the Democratic and Republican parties?
As per the United States voting framework, an independent voter is a non–fanatic electorate who is
not subsidiary with a specific political gathering. Independents can either be immaculate or
inclining. Inclining Independents tend to vote for the gathering they incline more towards along
these lines they are mostly divided in that sense. Immaculate

Presentation Of The Presidential Election
Team #2
Collaborative Session#1
Task A:
Tuesday, November 8, 2016 will be the 58 quadrennial US presidential election. Over the last 58
elections, never has there been a more controversial topic to speaks about. From the issues that are
being debated about, to the Presidential candidates themselves. This year 's' Presidential race has
been closely monitored by people from all different demographics. The issues debated will not only
have an impact on the United States, but they will have an even bigger impact on other countries all
over the world. An estimated 50 million people are projected to vote on November 8, 2016, and 58%
of Americans between the ages of 18–24 will be voting in this year 's election. These number can
play a huge part in determining who will be the next President of the United States. There are four
primary candidates for the 2016 Presidential election are, but only two of them are gaining so much
attention. Never has there been an electoral race that contains so much dislike for the top nominees.
The race between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump has caused many Americans to question
whether or not they should vote with their party, or to start looking into other candidates who they
might view as a better fit for President. Millennials in particular have been really outspoken about
the subject. According to an article in fortune.com " Millennials gave Clinton less than 30% of their
votes in key primaries, and 25% of young Republicans say they will vote

Presidential Election Vs. Election
Fifteen years ago, President George Bush won the presidential election beating Al Gore, who had
won the popular vote. This election is one of the most contested in this century. The same election is
also an example of the United States Electoral College voting system in action. The Electoral
College permits a candidate to win a presidential election without winning the popular vote. The
American campaign and election system can be broken down into three significant parts, the
nomination, the campaign, and the election. Each portion of the campaign and election system is
distinct from the other, but have some similarities. Prior to running in the national presidential
election, the candidate must win the party nomination. The nomination ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In addition to nomination issues, there are campaign fund issues. As described by Paul Steinhauser
and Robert Yoon's article, "Cost to Win Congressional Election Skyrockets," for CNN, the cost to
win congressional elections is rising steeply. Steinhauser and Yoon explain that on average it costs
$1.6 million to win a House seat, which, after accounting for inflation, is 344% more than in 1986.
Steinhauser and Yoon also emphasize that in the House of Representatives, incumbents outspend
their challengers by an average ratio of $3 for every $1 the challenger spends. Senate incumbents on
average outspend their challengers by $3.5 million. The authors also explain that in 2012 outside
groups spent $457 million on congressional elections. An outside group could be a group or
individual, for example a PAC (Political Action Committee) or a wealthy individual. Ashley Parker
relates her article, "Outside Money Drives a Deluge of Political Ads," in The New York Times to the
influx in spending by outside groups. She explains that political spending for advertising is
increasing rapidly compared to past elections. Parker also emphasizes that outside groups buy more
advertisement time than the candidates themselves. She concludes her article by emphasizing that
soon enough political advertisements are going to start airing on TV right after November elections,
this is some two years before the next vote. Equally important

Evolution Of Presidential Elections
The U.S. constitution assigned the task of handling elections to the states with the result being fifty
diverse election systems. At the legislative level, elections for the U.S. House of Representatives are
held every two years and the Senate elections are conducted every six years. Typically, the
president's party will lose seats in most elections; however, incumbents have a strong propensity for
winning reelection. The average campaign cost for a House of Representatives seat is over $1.7
million and the average cost for a Senate race is $10.5 million. Thus, candidates spend numerous
hours raising money over the phone, through the mail, and at fundraising events. The money raised
pays for everything from television ads to campaign paraphernalia. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The first phase is the nominating process. The states work with the national parties to firm up their
specific primary election date. More Americans show up to vote in the general election than in the
primaries. A winning nominee must pick up a defined number of convention delegates that are
divvied out based on state population. Traditionally, a winner–take–all system where a candidate
had to win all of the delegates in order win the state has been used by the Republican Party.
Recently, the Republican Party has moved to the same system as the Democrats. The Democratic
Party selects their candidate through a proportional representation system whereby the delegates are
assigned based on the proportion of the vote the candidate wins. The second presidential election
phase consists of the two major party conventions and takes place in the summer before the election.
Conventions can give the party's nominee a lift in the polls, or an electoral boost, lasting days into
weeks. The third phase of the presidential election is the general election, which begins after the
conventions and ends on Election Day. During general election phase, two or three debates are held
between the

Presidential Elections And Election Elections
Political elections, especially presidential elections have many variables that influence the voters
when they go to the polls. Many researchers use various methods to figure out all the possible
outcomes of the election and what the voters are looking for in a particular year. This year has been
unique because of the different personalities that the candidates own. This new diversity has caused
researchers to revise their tactics from earlier years. Also, negative political ads for this election year
have had some impact on voters. Furthermore, a candidate's religious affiliation will also have an
effect on different segments of the population. Finally, in previous presidential elections, divided
parties rarely won presidential elections. Will this year have the same end result? Finally, the exact
effects caused by these variables can sometimes only be determined by research studies. These
studies have to be ready to hit the core of the issue affecting the outcome. Furthermore, the
questions have to be tailored, balanced and presented the same way in all outlets.
Multitude of Media Outlets
Voting for the next President of the United States is very important in our country. In our society
today voters want to know if the next President will solve the issues that effects them and how well
will he or she keep this country moving forward. Voters have more media outlets now than ever
before when trying to decide who they want to support as a leading candidate to run for

Primaries In Presidential Elections
There are several different types of primaries in presidential elections that allow only specific
candidates to move forward to the general elections. Each primary accomplishes a different goal,
which can range from establishing a favorite party to establishing a favorite candidate. After
reviewing the four main types of primary systems in the American Democratic system, the system
that provides the most benefits is the open primary system. A major benefit of the open primary
system is that the voters are able to vote for their favorite candidate rather than their favorite party. A
voter may not always identify solely with one party or their views may not always closely resemble
the views expressed by their established party. Therefore an open

2016 Presidential Election Analysis
The 2016 election was one of the most interesting, and strange presidential elections in history. For
the democrats they had leading nominee Hillary Clinton who was a former Secretary of State, and
on the republican side they had a very wealthy real estate nominee named Donald Trump. The
voting behavior throughout this election stayed similar to years past, and accordingly fifty–eight
percent of eligible voters hit the polls. With that being said there were similar demographic groups
voting for the same political parties. The demographic groups which played a significant role was
the White Evangelical Christian which partake in the religion spectrum. Next is the wealthier
families that received anywhere from fifty–thousand to one–hundred ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The African American group has leaned towards the democratic vote since John F Kennedy and
Lyndon B Johnson, this extreme change of voting occurred during the Civil Rights movement when
both of these men were "outlawing public discrimination, and garnering 94% of the black vote"
(University of California, 1). This demographic group is rapidly growing due to the fact that it is an
ethnicity, and that they have always voted democrat for the beliefs and role the democrats have
played in order to better the specific race. The 2016 election proved once again to be a great success
for the democrats when it came time for the African American support, this is shown through the
astounding eighty–eight percent vote for Hillary Clinton. The African American vote is a very
crucial poll that the democrats rely on, due to the decrease in percentage from the 2012 election
(Obama) at ninety–three percent to Hillary's poll numbers at eighty–eight percent from the same
demographic group. The factor of the Civil Rights movements that shaped the world we live in
today is a huge factor on why the African American ethnicity will always lean towards the
democratic view. Without that major factor all of the electoral votes would be very different, and
would look as if they would always lean more towards a liberal or republican view. The final
demographic group in the list is the income groups, especially the

The Presidential Election Of 1980 Essay
On Tuesday, 4 November 1980, The United States presidential election of 1980 was held. The
competition was between incumbent Democratic President Jimmy Carter and his opponent, former
Californian Republican Governor, Ronald Reagan. Reagan, assisted by a falling economy
complicated by inflation and high unemployment, and the Iran hostage crisis, Reagan would win the
election in a sweep, receiving the largest number of electoral votes ever tallied by a presidential
candidate not currently in office. Jimmy Carter, who beat out Edward M. Kennedy for the
nomination for Democratic leader, attacked Reagan as a wild right–wing fundamentalist. The former
actor, Ronald Reagan pledged to elevate the cynical mood of the nation, and won a conclusive
victory. This election marked the creation of what was called the "Reagan Revolution," and
indicated a conservative repositioning in national government.
Throughout the 1970s, the United States underwent a wrenching period of low economic growth,
high inflation and interest rates, and intermittent energy crises. In the spring and summer of 1979,
inflation was on the rise and various parts of the United States were experiencing energy shortages,
Carter was widely blamed and planned on delivering a major speech about energy conservation, but
he thought the American public did not care for what he had to say. In the mist of all this, Carter
went on the presidential retreat for the bilateral treaty on Camp David. "For more than a week, a

1860 Presidential Election
The Election of 1860 There was a lot of people running, but not a lot of them were good.Lincoln
was pretty much the only good presidential nominee running. He was one of if not the only one who
didn't really have an opinion on slavery. Abraham Lincoln, John C. Breckinridge, John Bell, and
Stephen A. Douglas are the presidential candidates for the 1860 presidential election. John C.
Breckinridge, was part of the Southern Democratic Party.John C. Breckinridge, was one of the
runners. John C. Breckinridge, was representing the southern Democratic party. Breckinridge will
serve as the fourteenth Vice president. Breckinridge was born January 21st 1821 and died May 17th
1875. John Bell, ran in the Constitutional Union Party. John Bell, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The secession was pushed mostly by the southern planters. Also known as the slave owners. They
were afraid that the government was going to eventually have anti–slavery supporters. Then they
would outlaw slavery. This also destroyed the democratic party. It was split into 2 pieces. The
southern democrats and northern democrats. If Stephen Douglas, won I think the Civil War would
go on even longer. I think that just because of the simple fact that Abraham Lincoln, exposed him
for not liking slavery in a debate. I think the economical resources would spread better and he would
help the country expand

Presidential Election : Presidential Elections
The 2016 presidential election may happen to be one of the most memorable elections to have ever
been. From the campaign speeches, to the Democratic and Republican National conventions, and
even the presidential debates; Americans seemed to constantly be voicing their opinions on every
aspect of the election, and who they believe is the more suitable candidate for president, especially
on social media. The 2016 presidential election marks one of the more recent elections where we
start to see social media's impact on it. We see how presidential candidates use social media as a
platform to voice about updates on their campaign as well as communicate with their supporters.
With the continue rise in the number of social media users as well as politicians now using social
media, how much has its impact had on elections and Americans outlook on the campaign.
According to textbook 'Communication Theory', metatheory is the stated or inherent assumptions
made when creating a theory. If you aren't familiar with a theory's underlying assumptions about
truth, human nature, the purpose of the theory, and its values, then a person can't fully understand a
theory. We'll see the studies of people who have implied metatheory on whether or not social media
has had an effect on presidential elections. We start to see social media's trans figurative impact back
in the 2008 presidential election. J. Gregory concluded in his article 'Impact of Social Media in 2012
Presidential Election'

Social Media In Presidential Elections
Throughout history, presidential candidates have capitalized to newspapers, radio, television and
now social media to inform about the campaign proposals. In the middle of the Digital Age, social
media platforms such Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn performed an important role
during the US presidential elections 2016.
President–elect of the United States, Donald Trump made social networks his main means of contact
with the US and foreign population during his campaign. However, his contact with mass media is
no recent. In 2003 the American businessman became the executive producer and host of the NBC
reality show The Apprentice.
Since Donald Trump announced his candidacy for the presidency last June 16, 2015; many people
began to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People felt more related because platforms such Facebook and Twitter are more interactive than
broadcasting. For example, last February 17; Trump tweet "Interesting how President Obama so
haltingly said I "would never be president" – This from perhaps the worst president in U.S. history!"
this tweet had 22,755 likes and 9,056 retweets. The On the other hand, The New York Times
published that Donald Trump earned close to $2 billion worth of worth of free media. The TV
program "Meet the Press" of the NBC television network experienced the highest ratings during
interviews to Donald Trump.
Many people have called this process "Social Media Election" for the impact that this technological
tool gendered in the United States and other countries. People from all over the world could see the
presidential debates, visits of the candidates to the different states and exclusive interviews live
through Facebook. In addition, the repetitions of these events circulated in Facebook during weeks,
people could comment and share the information in their own profiles. Students from the Political
Communication class at John Brown University realized a simulation of a campaign to bring people
voting and observing how students responses to the

Three Presidential Elections
Presidential elections have and continue to be a time where Americans begin to pay attention to
politics a little more in depth, they look into the issues which burden America, and then decide
which candidate, in their views would fix and continue to grow the policies and programs which are
working to America's advantage. Presidential elections have and will continue to grow and change,
but the past three presidential elections have seen many changes and have been very different just in
the course of 12 years. Although a lot has changed there are some major things that have
dramatically changed just from election to election such as, campaign strategy and spending,
"battleground states" or states which could vote for either candidate, the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For the 2004 election at the forefront of discussion was the Iraq War, and terrorism and Homeland
Security. In 2008 war in Iraq continued as a major issue, taxes and the economy moved into the
spotlight also. In 2012, improving the economy shifted into the spotlight and getting rid of the
deficit, also public services such as Medicare, Medicaid and social security. So as you can see issues
continued to grow and those that are solved the ones that are not continue to evolve, and it's a
vicious cycle that constantly

Democratic Election : Presidential Election
In this Presidential Election, the Republican Party is a disadvantage in Florida due to the large
concentrations of voters in major cities. The majority of the state votes for the Republican candidate,
but big cities like Miami, Orlando, and Tampa always seem to vote for the Democratic candidate. In
the 2012 election between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, Mitt Romney won all but thirteen
counties but lost in majorly in the urban areas where Barack Obama won an astonishing number of
the votes. For Donald Trump to stand a chance, he must focus on the rural cities with a large number
of Conservative and Independent voters and has a low voter turnout.
The number one county Donald Trump must focus on is Sarasota County. Even with almost one
hundred and twenty thousand registered republican voters during the 2012 election, Romney still
only was able to carry fifty–two percent of the votes in that county. This is a very populated county
filled with republican voters who have a low turnout rate in previous elections. Money should be
pumped into Sarasota to help increase voter turnout for the Trump Pence campaign. With a large
push to get Republican voters to come out and vote Donald could win a bunch of solid votes to
offset some of the counties he will struggle in.
The largest group of counties that should be focused on are the counties of; Collier, Martin, Indian
River, Escambia, Lake, Highlands, Citrus, Marion, Manatee, Charlotte and Lee. Like Sarasota
County, these counties have

Upcoming Presidential Election
3 Things to Keep in Mind for the Upcoming Presidential Election
1. Only about 10% of the entire nation voted for Trump OR Clinton
Yup, that's right, only about 10% of the entire nation voted for Donald Trump OR Hilary Clinton,
yet they are still the Presidential Candidates from the Republican and Democratic Parties. How? In
the presidential primaries Donald Trump won the state of Alabama with roughly 43% of all the
voters. However, only .3% of registered voters voted for him at all. In a state of 4.8 million, only
14000 voted. In Tennessee, Hillary won with 66% of 3.7% of the total registered. While
substantially higher than Trump's Alabama win, it is still an unacceptably low turnout for the voting
of the possible President of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Third party voters are sometime the difference between a victory and a loss for a presidential
candidate. Most don't mention it, but you do have power. Each and every vote counts. While a 3rd
might not win the election, they still impact it. Al Gore would have won the 2000 presidential
election if he had received 1% of the votes that Ralph Nader, Green Party Presidential Nominee,
received. 3rd party voters helped to give the win to George W. Bush. Not only do 3rd party voters
impact who wins the election, but they can convince candidates to change their platforms.
Candidates want voters, a handful of voters can mean the difference between a Republican President
or a Democratic President. In order to get these key voters, they change the way they phrase
responses, comments, and their general speech. For example, take Donald Trump. Just listen to how
his tone changes between each debate, every appearance, even between every tweet. He's trying to
secure key groups to his victory that would normally vote 3rd party or not vote at all. However, if
you don't like the changes either candidate has made and still feel as if this is a "lesser of the two
evils" election, then vote 3rd party. Who knows? Maybe Gary Johnson will be this winner, all it
requires is for you to actually register and

Presidential Elections And The Presidential Election
A Presidential Election, determines how the next four years would be. The election is a fight
between different political parties, and they fight to win and represent the political beliefs and values
of their followers. In the 2016 Presidential Election, there are many candidates who ran for
president. There are main two main parties, the Democrat party and the Republican party, there were
also many Third–party candidates. Donald Trump the primary candidate for the Republicans ran
with no political experiences and won while Hillary Clinton the primary Democrat candidate who
was the former sectary of state ran and lost. Not only was there a fight between the different parties,
there also was fighting among each other and in individual parties. Many parties had many different
views on the issues of today world. They both made many different promises on each issue. When it
came to domestic issues the primary two parties agreed and disagreed on many things such as when
it came to induvial rights. They both took many different stances on the issues whether it was gun
control, abortion and racial judgment in the criminal justice system.
An example would be when came to the right to have an abortion. Clinton who believed that the
right to have an abortion should remain legal. She said "but it needs to be safe and rare. And I have
spent many years now, as a private citizen, as first lady, and now as senator, trying to make it rare,
trying to create the conditions where women

Presidential Election : Presidential Candidates Essay
Language is a significant component for presidential candidates to win the votes of citizens. The
way a person communicates or articulates his or her views can be an essential factor for people to
determine whether the individual is the right person to lead a nation. Politicians must choose their
words carefully and wisely to express their issues if they intend for people to trust them. The power
of words is immense since it can greatly influence people. In the past few years, the United States
has seen numerous of worrisome issues in which Americans are conscientiously analyzing and
deciding which presidential candidate should be the next president in this year's election.
Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump use various of ways to
gain support. The language each candidate uses has effectively assisted the candidates in earning
their respective voters. With the explanatory and argumentative methods of Hillary Clinton, she is
able to interact with her voters efficiently while Donald Trump uses simplistic yet hyperbolic
language to attract Americans who share a common ideology with him. Throughout Hillary
Clinton's speeches and debates, she been methodical in using her words by preserving a positive
tone while communicating facts to support her ideas. For instance, in Hillary Clinton's acceptance
speech at the Democratic Convention, her language was generally positive. Clinton explains how
the country is fundamentally in a well–off place.

Presidential Election Debates TV Role Critique

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Christy Davis

More from Christy Davis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Presidential Election Debates TV Role Critique