Legalization of Assisted Suicide Debate

The Legalization of Assisted Suicide
Assisted Suicide has through out history caused controversy among our society. There are two sides
to this issue, one that passionately supports it, and those who religiously disagree. I believe that
assisted suicide should become legal for several reasons. Assisted suicide gives individuals the right
to end their suffering when they personally feel that their time has come to die. Assisted suicide
should become legal because if one can decide to put an animal out of its misery, why shouldn't that
person have the same right to put themselves out of their own misery if that hardship came upon
them. Though the topic may seem morbid, dying people in grave medical circumstances have rights.
It's important we recognize their right to end their own suffering and respect the very personal
decisions these people are forced to make. It is legal for humans to decide whether or not their pet
should be euthanized. These reasons may vary. According to Pet Euthanasia, people decide to put
their animals down because, of inconveniences, living changes, and severe sicknesses. The owner of
a pet may move their home to a different location. Many different places have different rules that
may vary one including not allowing pets. In this case some owners decide to euthanize their
beloved pet to simply get rid of a problem. An owner may also come across inconveniences due to
their pet. For example, when leaving for a relaxing holiday vacation, the cost to board your pet
would cost too much.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Assisted Suicide And The Euthanasia Movement
Assisted Suicide Imagine being in enough excruciating pain for a long enough time and deciding
that even dying would be better. Assisted suicide is affecting more people around the world every
day; either under agreeable or disagreeable terms, depending on each person's opinion. What is
assisted suicide and why is controversy over this topic still here after at least 1,500 years of
existence (A Merciful End: The Euthanasia Movement in Modern America)? There are many factors
to consider when one wants to figure out the side of this global controversy they want to belong to.
Some of these include financial demands, different types of assisted suicide, general suicidal rates
(in areas where it is already legalized), demographic facts, and its history. Assisted suicide has
produced a series of different outcomes within society: the raising of suicidal rates, arguing over the
topic, and the increasing of its popularity within the world. The term "assisted suicide" is quite self–
explanatory in its definition: the suicide of a patient suffering from an incurable disease, effected by
the taking of lethal drugs provided by a doctor. Assisted suicide, in the areas that have legalized it,
usually has to involve a request to the physician for a medication–induced death. In some places,
people are able to choose to die before illness takes control. This method has existed for many years
and has not always required a physician's approval. The history of assisted suicide is

Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide
Being able to decide the fate of your own life is not an easy decision to make, and is not something
to be toyed with. However, when someone is in a desperate situation, and must choose before they
lose their mind (quite literally), death may be more appealing, instead of living, and being forced to
suffer. By legalizing euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide, we would provide "vulnerable"
patients with better overall protection and health care, give patients (who are excruciatingly
suffering and have no chance of recovery) the option to end their lives before they ever needed to go
through such an ordeal and giving them peace of mind, and spare the families of the patients the
emotional pain of watching their loved one slowly and painfully passing away. For these reasons, I
believe that euthanasia and Physician–Assisted Suicide should be legalized in Canada. Euthanasia
and physician–assisted suicide are two similar topics which are constantly countered with extremely
weak statements, such as "the argument that if we respect the liberty of some individuals to choose
assisted death we will thereby expose the ill and frail to an increased risk of abuse or exploitation"
(Schafer, "the case for legalization"), which is commonly known as the "slippery slope" debate.
However, several countries and select states in the United States who have legalized euthanasia have
not shown any signs of "slippery slopes". In fact, these areas have actually demonstrated that:
[R]ates of

Euthanasia Essay
Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
Remarkably, few have noticed that frail, elderly and terminally ill people oppose assisted suicide
more than other Americans. The assisted–suicide agenda is moving forward chiefly with vocal
support from the young, the able–bodied and the affluent, who may even think that their parents and
grandparents share their enthusiasm. They are wrong.
Thus the assisted suicide agenda appears as a victory not for freedom, but for discrimination. At its
heart lie demeaning attitudes and prejudices about the value of life with an illness or disability. All
who believe in the dignity of human beings should reject such attitudes.
When people raise their voices against this injustice, let no one ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They join efforts against assisted suicide in state and federal legislatures, and work to educate to the
dire threat posed by this agenda. Also they join wherever possible with other religious, medical,
disability rights, and public interest groups to call our nation to true compassion for the seriously ill
–– a compassion based on respect for their lives.
In 1973, the highest court in our land made a tragic error by declaring a constitutional "right" to take
the life of unborn children. That decision, too, was defended as a victory for freedom. In reality it
has led to 40 million deaths, physical and emotional suffering for countless women, and a
coarsening of our society's attitudes toward human life. It has led to the legalized killing of children
even in the very process of being born. The degradation of human life it has produced must not be
allowed to expand through assisted suicide.
No court, no legislature, no human being has the right to say that any human life is worthless, or that
any human being is of less value than another. We pray that our Supreme Court and all our fellow
Americans will realize this truth, and take the path that leads to life.
Numerous studies have established that the Americans most directly affected by the issue of
physician–assisted suicide –– those who are frail, elderly and suffering from terminal illness –– are
also more opposed to legalizing the practice than others are:

Arguments Against Assisted Suicide
All around the world, most specifically the U.S., Assisted Suicide has been debated by courts,
people and physicians. It's one of the most prominent topics among the states. The statistics state
that 68% of Americans think that doctors should be allowed to assist terminally ill patients in death.
(Dugan 1)
With Assisted Suicide (most commonly known as physician assisted suicide), has been (and is
being) argued in the states, while some have come to agreement on the topic, which include Oregon,
Washington and Vermont. (Thompson 1) There are many ways a person can assist and commit
suicide, though it's usually done with lethal medication. ("Oregon Department of Human Services")
While many physicians are against assisted suicide, there is the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Assisted suicide would solve the problem of people dying in horrible ways in the hospital. It would
give family members closure, instead of having their loved one die suddenly in an explicit way.
From Opposing Viewpoints in context, Physician–Assisted Suicide, "He was 'immensely grateful'
that he could end his life in a dignified and compassionate manner." (Sharon and Walters 1)
It would be humiliating also very sad for a family member to die in a painful, dreadful way. This
way, with assisted suicide by lethal medication, he was able to go in a relatively painful way.
The wife may have been distraught over his death, but at least she didn't have to see her husband
die, full of pain and regret, and many people wouldn't want to see anything like that either.
Assisted suicide could also solve the issue of patients dying in pain, and totally dependent on others
in the hospital.
From Opposing Viewpoints in Context, Physician–Assisted Suicide, "He described an incontinent,
pain–wracked, totally dependent existence that was exacerbated by watching the suffering of his
wife as she cared for him." (Sharon and Walters

Assisted Suicide : Rights And Responsibilities
Assisted Suicide: Rights and Responsibilities
A woman suffering from cancer became the first person known to die under the law on physician–
assisted suicide in the state of Oregon when she took a lethal dose of drugs in March, 1998. The
Oregon Death with Dignity Act passed a referendum in November, 1997, and it has been the United
States ' only law legalizing assisted suicide since then. According to the New England Journal of
Medicine, more than 4,000 doctors have approved of the assisted suicide law (cited in "The Anguish
of Doctors," 1996). The law allows terminally ill patients who have been given six months or less to
live and wish to hasten their deaths to obtain medication prescribed by two doctors. The most
important thing to notice is that this law does not include those who have been on a life support
system nor does it include those who have not voluntarily asked physicians to help them commit
suicide. The issue of doctor–assisted suicide has been the subject of the heated dispute in recent
years. Many people worry that legalizing doctor assisted suicide is irrational and violates the life–
saving tradition of medicine. However, physician–assisted suicide should be legalized because it
offers terminally ill people an opportunity for a peaceful death and recognized the inadequacy of
current medical practice to deal with death.
It has been argued that the reason why some terminally ill patients wish to commit suicide is
nothing more than melancholia. Patients

The Choice Of Assisted Suicide
ed. For the immense number of ill patients, the solution to their suffering is predominately quality
sedative care, of which I ardently encourage. Though there are ill patients who seek sedative care,
there is a significant amount of terminally ill patients for whom palliative care is not the solution
and who suffer tremendously until they die. These are the type of patients who wish to end their
suffering by making the decision to end their lives with the assistance of doctors. This also allows
them to end their lives with dignity, and place of their choice. The only way to prevent suffering of
this amount is to revise the law so patients are allowed to lawfully receive assistance to peacefully
pass away.
The acceptability to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Though the minimum age is 18, the average age of female patients to whom PAS was administered
was 65 years old; for men, the average age was 62. For both men and women PAS was most
frequently performed in the age–categories of 60–69 years and 70–79 years, and the demographics
of those who choose to administer assisted suicide is discretely towards those who are elderly. With
this, those who choose to end their life with dignity have lived long enough to make such a decision.
In places where assisted suicide is legal there is no evidence that the law is being abused, impotent
populations are being targeted, or that the patients are being constrained by physicians and or their
family members to choose this action. The right to die and to decide when life is no longer worth
living for is essential for human freedom, autarchy, and personal sovereignty. Neither the
government nor religious establishment should foist their own notions of ethics upon individuals
who are not harming others. A ban on physician assistance to suicide as applied to suit terminally ill
patients who wish to avoid the unendurable pain, substantially interferes with one's protected liberty
interest and cannot be sustained.
Envision yourself facing endless suffering and excruciating pain but can do nothing about it. One
becomes desperate to find solutions to end their agony but chooses not to ask beloved ones due to
the trouble it could

The Importance Of Legalizing Assisted Suicide
Did you know, about 57% of physicians today have received a request for physician assisted suicide
due to suffering from a terminally ill patient. Patients that are suffering, or do not have that much
time to live are given the option of going through assisted suicide. People should not be able to
make the choice of euthanasia so easily. Euthanasia is another word for assisted suicide, which is
getting prescribed help from a doctor to commit suicide. Assisted suicide should not be freely
suggested, or suggested at all. Solutions to this could be regulating assisted suicide, or even banning
it. As a result of assisted suicide, many people will give up on themselves; therefore a ban is
necessary to prevent the death. The background of assisted suicide has formed it into what it is
today.
Over the years assisted suicide has become more and more popular. Debates have happened, and
laws have been made, but the United States have never com into an agreement on whether or not
assisted suicide should be allowed. An article about euthanasia stated the US Supreme Court upheld
laws forbidding physician–assisted suicide, but let the door open for states to pass legislation
permitting the practice" (Euthanasia). Since the United States Supreme Court did not not make up
their mind, states now have the right to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Gale Student Resources, "The earliest statute to outlaw assisted suicide came in 1828,
but long before that, common law recognized it as a crime" (Physician Assisted Suicide). In other
words, there was a point in time where assisted suicide was considered as the wrong thing to do. To
change the statute, people need to realize what is actually happening happen while helping a patient
commit assisted suicide. If people realize the problem that is happening with euthanasia laws will be
changed or created to stop

The Doctrine Of Physician Assisted Suicide
Although a majority of Americans consider suicide morally wrong, the public shows a broad
support for the idea of physician assisted suicide when considering terminal patients. However, even
though it is the same concept, the term "physician assisted suicide" is a somewhat negative
implication for a substantial amount of Americans, which is why the public is divided when asked
about its moral acceptance. Physician–assisted suicide is thought by many to be a form of
euthanasia, however, it is not. Euthanasia is when a doctor injects a patient with a lethal dosage of
medication accelerating the death process. During this process, the physician only prescribes a lethal
dose of medication to a patient. According to Dr. Brian Pollard, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
(Oregon health authority, 2015) Just a month later of November 1997, another state wide ballot
presented which asked Oregon voters to withdrawal the Death with Dignity Act. The ballot was
carried out, yet the voters still favored the act by a 60% margin, this allowed the Death with Dignity
Act to remain. Oregon then became the first state to allow this practice followed by Washington,
Vermont, and Montana. New Mexico has become significantly closer to becoming the fifth state
(Ganzini, 2015). DWDA allows terminally ill individuals to end their lives through the method of
self–administration of medications that cause death; these medications are prescribed by a physician
for this purpose. The law states that, in order to participate, the patient must have specific criteria's
to be able to participate in the program. The patient verbally voices two requests to willingly take
their own lives, this request must be at least 15 days apart and the patient must also provide a
written request to the physician followed by two witnesses including one that is not related to the
participant. Following this step the diagnosis and prognosis must then be confirmed by the primary
physician and consulting MD. This is also completed with an assessment determining whether the
patient is capable of making health care decisions for him/herself (Ganzini, 2015). The patient may

The Right to Assisted Suicide Essay
You're visiting the hospice for the twenty–third day in a row; the soft squeaking of the linoleum and
the gentle buzz of the fluorescents in the waiting room greet you as you walk in. You're visiting your
Grandmother, whose lung cancer has entered metastasis, and has been slowly spreading throughout
her body; she has already lost movement in her arms. She is a hollow shell of the woman she once
was; her once bright eyes have been fading steadily every day, and her bubbly demeanor has
become crushed and gravelly, and every day before you leave, she will only say, "Kill me." What
would you do in this situation? Would you break the law in order to respect your elder's wishes? It is
a cruel reality we live in when ability to choose the time ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
According to Simon Jenkins, a writer for the British newspaper The Guardian, states that "there
cannot be a human freedom so personal as ordering the circumstances of one's own death...[yet]...
the near universal desire 'to be allowed to die in my own home' is willfully disregarded" (Jenkins 1).
By allowing yourself to have life, one would assume that this gives you freedom over other aspects
of your existence, including when it should end. By denying the rights to achieve liberty, achieve
happiness, and define our lives, are we not denying the rights governments around the world were
founded on? It is the denial of these rights that allows the mental stress felt by patients to turn into
physical pain. Physical pain felt by patients is most often not caused by their injuries, but by neglect.
Montana's Death with Dignity Act, as stated by bioethicist Jacob Appel, is a hollow victory, as no
physicians are willing to give consented assistance. A physician neglecting to assist a patient with
committing suicide is more damaging than healing; it causes the patient to suffer through their
injuries while searching out another doctor to assist them. This is what happened with Janet
Murdock: suffering from ovarian–cancer, she traveled throughout Montana, only to be denied
assisted–suicide from every physician she met (Appel 1). Her pain was exacerbated by a law that
was enacted to help relieve the

Assisted Suicide
Introduction/Rationale
"No person is entitled to consent to have death inflicted on him, and such consent does not affect the
criminal responsibility of any person by whom death may be inflicted on the person by whom
consent is given.", this is according to the Indiana Code of Criminal Law and Procedure.
In ancient days, assisted suicide was frequently seen as a way to preserve one's honor. For the past
twenty–five years, on the other hand, the practice has been viewed as a response to the progress of
modern medicine. New and often expensive medical technologies have been developed that prolong
life. However, the technologies also prolong the dying processes, leading some people to question
whether modern medicine is forcing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The other person simply helps for example, providing the means for carrying out the action.
In the US, only the State of Oregon permits assisted suicide or physician–assisted suicide. The
Oregon Death with Dignity Act allows terminally ill state residents to receive prescriptions for self–
administered lethal medications from their physicians. It does not permit euthanasia, in which a
physician or other person directly administers a medication to a patient in order to end his or her
life. The Oregon law allows adults with terminal diseases who are likely to die within 6 months to
obtain lethal doses of drugs from their doctors. A relatively very small number of people sought
lethal drugs under the law and even fewer people who actually used them. Many patients have said
that what they want most is a choice about how their lives will end, "a finger on the remote control,
as it were."
Like for instance, the case of Diane, one of the patients of Dr. Timothy Quill. She was diagnosed
with acute myelomonocytic leukemia and she was under Dr. Quill for a period of 8 years. Dr. Quill
informed her of the diagnosis, and of the possible treatments. The series of treatments include
multiple sessions of chemotherapy and bone marrow transplant, accompanied by an array of
ancillary

Physician Assisted Suicide Essay
In homes across the world, millions of victims are suffering from fatal and terminal illnesses.With
death knocking on their door, should these people have to endure pain and misery knowing what is
to come? The answers to these questions are very controversial. Furthermore, there is a greater
question to be answered–should these people have the right and option to end the relentless pain and
agony through physician assisted death? Physician–Assisted Suicide PAS is highly contentious
because it induces conflict of several moral and ethical questions such as who is the true director of
our lives. Is suicide an individual choice and should the highest priority to humans be alleviating
pain or do we suffer for a purpose? Is suicide a purely ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Secondly, the patient should be capable of making and communicating health care decisions for him
or herself. Thirdly, the patient must be diagnosed with a terminal illness that will lead to death
within six months. Interested patients must also provide the request for termination in writing to the
physician. In addition, physicians are expected to inform patients to alternative means of care
including hospice care and other medications. Only after precautions evaluation, the laws then
permit patients to make the ultimate life ending decision. A pathologist from Michigan, Dr. Jack
Kevorkian was one of the first to participate in PAS (Strate, Zalman & Hunter, 2005, p. 25). There
are documented writings discussing the severity of his patients: "those who seek him out have
deteriorated by slow, painful degrees and wish to exit from their infernos on Earth before they
deteriorate cognitively and/or choke to death" (Zeldis's, 2005 p. 130). Many of his patients explain
how they feel their own body withdraw and turn on itself; and not even being able to eat or go to the
bathroom (Friend, Mary and Louanne, 2011, p. 116). stress that dignity and integrity are very
personal matters; it is probable that being dependent on others to perform basic activities of daily
living threaten a patient's dignity and thus determine when an explicit request for PAS is made.
Perhaps to deny someone the ability to limit their suffering is cruel. My main argument in support of
PAS bears the

Physician Assisted Suicide Thesis Statement
Research Paper Topic and Thesis
Terminally ill patients' requests for physician–assisted suicide are now a viable possibility. Knowing
the pathways to answering to those patients, as their requests for assisted death persist, is upmost
importance. As of June, 9th 2016 California became the fifth state to allow physician–assisted
suicide. The California's End of Life Option Act authorizes any individual 18 years of age or older,
who has been diagnosed as terminally ill and fits specific criteria, to solicit administration of
assisted dying drugs at the hands of his/her attending physician. This Act will require specific
documentation and data to be submitted to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) by
the attending physician ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Oregon ranks among the best states in the provisions of excellence of palliative care in 2015
California received a "B" which revealed an opportunity for improvement (Petrillo, Dzeng, &
Smith, 2016, p. 828).
The study also showed that for–profit, small and community hospitals had very limited accessibility
to palliative care; and the higher request for physician assisted death came from outpatient facilities.
It has been noted that palliative care practices are extremely low nationwide. Neither primary care
physicians nor specialists who treat terminally ill patients routinely are provided with palliative care
training. These are important facts since statistics show that although most individuals support the
option for a physician–assisted suicide the low numbers of actual requests for assisted death
reflected the preference of alternative treatment options. As patients regain the power of making
decisions regarding their care, aggressive pain control measures are put in place; consideration of
physician–assisted suicide becomes an avoidable option for a dignified death. Regardless of the
views on physician–assisted death healthcare professional

Physician Assisted Suicide-Suicide Staying Alive
Physician Assisted Suicide: Staying Alive "Only because I knew that I could not and would not kill
my patients was I able to enter most fully and intimately into caring for them as they lay dying
(Doerflinger, Richard M., M.D, and Carlos F. Gomez, Ph.D). In this quote given by a physician, one
sees that even from a professional's standpoint on physician–assisted suicide, one is opposed to that
act of helping someone to take his or her own life. When given the opportunity, this physician would
rather help to improve the life of the patient rather than ending a life that does not need to end and
that is the viewpoint that all should take on this controversial topic. Throughout this paper, one will
see just how affected people are by the repercussions ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They believe that the patient should be able to choose the direction they want to take their lives in
and if the best solution for those suffering is lethal drugs, they should not be denied that option.
According to Lisa Schencker, (2015) 69% of Americans favored allowing doctors to end a patient's
life by painless means. Many support because of autonomy, a financial standpoint or simply because
they have compassion for the dying. Advocates believe that everyone deserves the right to live a
quality life, and if a patient requests assisted suicide it should be honored. States who also agree
with this decision, and actively participate in physician–assisted suicide are Oregon, who passed
their law in 1994 with 51 percent in favor, then later enacted their law in 1997. Washington, who
enacted their law in 2008 with 57.91 percent support. Vermont then enacted their Patient Choice act
in 2013. Then in 2016, both California and Colorado enacted their laws. All of these law granted
patients to participate in physician assisted suicide under strict conditions to follow. Physicians must
follow through with these strict guidelines as well as making sure that their duties are carried out
correctly, and legally. The physician must also explain to the patient that they have other options
such as hospice, and other pain relieving medications. If the patient decides that they want to follow
through

Why Is Assisted Suicide Legalized
If Assisted Suicide was to become a law that the states can use it a lot of people with illnesses would
die. This means that their family member would be in great grief to find that their family member
decided that they wanted to die. The problem is that patients of doctors with illnesses might choose
to die if Assisted Suicide is legalized in the States. A possible solution that could occur is that it
could become illegal in the States, so that patients could not make a rash decision to kill themselves
with drugs. Another possible solution could be that they could only make the decision if their family
members and relatives agree. Also, they could only choose this with relative approval if they are 18
or older. If Assisted Suicide is legalized, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A possible solution to assisted suicide would be to stop it in every state in the US. This helps this
issue by stopping people from giving them the choice of assisted suicide. Which would lead to less
deaths from this issue.
Using lethal drugs to kill someone should be illegal in the US. Another, possible solution for this
could be to not use drugs to kill someone without any direction on self–administration. This helps
this issue by not killing patients with drugs at their own home. This also helps people try to survive
their terminal illness instead of just giving up.
If assisted–suicide becomes a law that is legalized that doctors and physicians patients will die if
they choose to. Assisted suicide means a situation in which a physician provides the means of death
for a gravely ill patient but the patient takes the final step. This is a problem because it's killing
patients with lethal drugs or killing patients with Euthanasia. Some solutions are to stop this in the
US or give them hope to make them want to live. This is not a situation to be taken lightly this
should be stopped because if it is not than people will die by doctors that are supposed to help
people survive. People should help stop this with the rest of the protestors. People should help save
a live from a person with terminal illnesses, they should help save a family from

Arguments Against Assisted Suicide
Assisted suicide has been a hot topic for quite some time. Proponents against and for assisted
suicide continue to weigh in their opinions about the issue. Groups who are in favor of this practice
report a patient is enforcing their own autonomy and right to die. Advocates against assisted suicide
say that this practice will open up doors to abuse and it is immoral to take a life. I am currently in
the middle of both sides, seeing potential benefits that may result, but a darker side is lurking.
Assisted suicide is not a new practice there is a long history of this that has been dated back to
ancient Greece and Rome where a poison hemlock was used for euthanasia. In the 19th century
chloroform or other anesthetics were advocated to result ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
A number of patients who are terminally ill would not choose to autonomously assisted suicide
maybe challenged in their decision for a natural death and many prefer not to defend their decision
for a natural death. There are also patients who maybe coerced into assisted suicide by relatives due
to financial restraints and cost for continuation of care, this situation would violate the patient's
autonomy. It is also plausible for a patient to be suffering from depression and may choose assisted
suicide due to depression, which maybe treated by appropriate medications. Assisted suicide for
severely disabled is also not permissible. It is argued that people who are severely disabled are
better alive than dead as a generalization. Allowing assisted suicide would create an environment to
make it difficult to correct injustices suffered to the severely disabled. This may encourage
communities to believe that the severely disabled are better off dead and less willing to support laws
and social polices that support their needs (Scoccia, 2010). Societal and introspective influences can
affect and cloud a person's autonomy. These reasons are at the top of arguments against assisted

Persuasive Essay On Assisted Suicide
Mr. Ewert has a fear of his body succumbing to total paralysis, which made him pursue his decision
to have an assisted suicide. I support his decision because I understand that he just was not enjoying
his life anymore and that he was tired of suffering. I also understand that he did not want his wife
suffering as well since she had been taking care of him and he didn't want to seem to be a hassle.
Another one of his fears was how he was going to die; he had done his research on ALS and said,
"Most people have a peaceful death, but what if I am the one who is not in most people." Mr.
Ewert's argument was that a person should be able to decide what they want to do with their life.
Now, one of the documents that support Mr. Ewert's decision to commit suicide is the philosopher's
brief, since one of two principles state, "Every competent person has the right to make personal
convictions about life's value for himself." Which is exactly what Mr. Ewert did. The thing is to
make assisted suicide legal everywhere, there would have to be a clear–cut interpretation of who is
qualified and who is not. Also, there would be the process of rules and regulations made about how
many deaths were allowed each week. He had to travel from England to Switzerland just so that he
could get help with his assisted suicide. Furthermore, another reason he seemed to be eager to die
was because the ALS disease progresses from two to five years and he was progressing

The Importance Of Assisted Suicide In The Suicide Tourist
I totally agree with Craig's choice to die at Dignitas because as his wife mentioned in the movie that
she had lost him six months before. He was present physically but the life within him was already
lost. Also, if we think about it, Craig was lucky to have a loving family and a supporting wife by his
side through his journey. He also had money to cover the cost of his voluntary suicide as well as his
funeral. Everyone is not as lucky as Craig. In the U.S, it is difficult to have good health even with
insurance coverage. As we watched the couples in Michael Moore's movie – husband had multiple
heart attack and wife had gone through chemotherapy – although they were covered by the
insurance they were left homeless with all the medical bills. In Suicide Tourist, Craig knew what
was the outcome of his disease. His health was only going to get worse from where he was.
We saw a hint of such legalization during Dr. Death's era in the 1990s. Dignitas in a way is
replicated after Dr. Kevorkian. The steps for voluntary suicide in "The Suicide Tourist" were pretty
much parallel to how Dr. Kevorkian carried out his plan. In the US, legalization of facilities like
Dignitas will be opposed because our society is highly conservative. In a country where marriage
between same sex is highly opposed, there is a small chance for the allowance of assisted suicide.
Religious people may believe that "life is God's gift and we as human beings do not have any right
to take it away." However, I

Essay Problems with Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Euthanasia Problems
Doctors do err on cancer patients' survival times, so how can they say when the time is ripe for
assisted suicide. A study in the July 1 issue of Cancer, the journal of the American Cancer Society,
finds that doctors are often wrong in predicting how long terminally ill cancer patients will live.
After studying the accuracy of doctors' predictions regarding 233 patients with end–of–life cancer,
the researchers found most doctors had a tendency to overestimate survival time. But among
patients who lived longer than six months, 40% had been expected to die sooner. The results are
relevant to decisions to refer patients to hospice care –– and also to decisions for assisted suicide,
which in Oregon can only be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hemlock's newsletter commented that "the younger the person, the more likely he or she is to favor
this legislation." The newsletter added that "this is somewhat at odds with how Hemlock views its
membership," since it sees itself as defending the interests of elderly citizens. (Humphry; Poll 9) A
study of cancer patients found that terminally ill patients experiencing significant pain are more
opposed to physician–assisted suicide than other terminally ill patients or the general public. The
patients who did tend to favor assisted suicide were those who had been diagnosed with clinical
depression. The researchers commented: "Patients with pain do not seem to view euthanasia or
physician–assisted suicide as the appropriate response to poor pain management. Indeed, oncology
patients in pain may be suspicious that if euthanasia or physician–assisted suicide are legalized, the
medical care system may not focus sufficient resources on provision of pain relief and palliative
care" (Emanuel 1809)
* Researchers at Duke University recently surveyed hundreds of frail elderly patients receiving
outpatient treatment and their families. The elderly patients themselves strongly opposed physician–
assisted suicide: only 34% favored legalization, with support even lower among female and black
patients. But 56% of their younger relatives favored it, and they were usually wrong in predicting
the elderly patients' views.

Nathaniel Henry
Block 2 white Assisted Suicide It's the twelfth time in two weeks you're walking through sets of
automatic doors to visit a loved one in Hospice care. The sounds of beeping machines that are
keeping patients alive overtakes the silent, dim hallways. You feel nothing but your heart ache
waiting for a magical remedy to keep your close one alive. You're visiting your uncle with stage 4
pancreatic cancer, whose lifeless and can barely get out of bed because he's tangled in cords
attached to the machines. Its starting to hit you when all you see is a colorless figure that screams
"kill me" every day. So why is this acceptable to modern day society? Assisted Suicide should be
considered when dealing with the patient's morals, cultural aspects, and the economy. If a patient
feels they are progressively getting worse until they have entered an altered state of misery.The U.S.
government or any type of government's medical institutions should not force life upon the patient.
Terminally ill patients should have the right to choose when they should leave this earth. Patients
that schedule the procedure want to "Die with dignity" which means they would like to leave earth
on their own terms. "Patients who are being kept alive by technology and want to end their lives
already have a recognized constitutional right to stop any and all medical interventions, from
respirators to antibiotics. They do not need physician–assisted suicide or euthanasia." (Ezekiel

The Death Of Assisted Suicide
Assisted Suicide is one of the most debated and opinionated topic in the world today. Currently, the
law in the UK has criminalised assisted suicide, with a maximum sentence of 14 years . Kevin Yuill
opposes those who are in favour of legalisation. By referencing the floodgates argument he believes
that more people who are not in a critical condition will use assisted suicide, thus exploiting the
system and leading into a transition to involuntary euthanasia. He also touches on the flaws in the
compassionate grounds theory and the breakdown in doctor patient relationships. Alternatively,
other theorists and pro legalisation campaigners such as Tony Nicklinson and Ilora Finlay look at
the beliefs of autonomy, compassion and individual dignity where if legalised it can end a wide area
of unnecessary suffering.
Kevin Yuill makes a fair case against the legalisation of assisted suicide, using the 'slippery slope'
theory. If assisted suicide becomes legal in the UK, there is potential for groups of people to exploit
the system altogether. As time progresses more people will become eligible, even branching out to
those who do not have a serious medical condition , but desire assisted suicide due to their own
personal problems. This brings about a moral issue, as it can open the floodgates to non–critical
suicides and potentially involuntary euthanasia . Looking at the Netherlands, where euthanasia is
not punishable if the doctor follows regulations and acts with due care, the

Doctor Assisted Suicide And Suicide
Doctor assisted suicide is a topic that has recently become a much larger debated issue than before.
A timeline put together by Michael Manning and Ian Dowbigging shows that prior to Christianity,
doctor assisted suicide was something that was tolerated, and was not heavily questioned (2). Yet, in
the 13th century, Thomas Aquinas had made a statement about suicide as well as doctor assisted
suicide, and his words shaped the Catholic teaching on suicide into what they teach today.
Beginning in the 17th century, Common Law tradition frowned upon suicide, as well as assisting in
suicide, and the colonies had adopted the Common Law principles. (2) In 1828, New York passed a
law completely outlawing the assistance of suicide, and made it to where whomever assisted in the
suicide could be tried for murder. In 1976, California became the first state to allow patients to
withdrawal themselves from life saving medicines, and this Natural Death Act was seen as a
gateway to assisted suicide. (3–7) As controversy about California 's Natural Death Act increased,
Pope John Paul II released a statement in 1980 which opposed to killing someone out of mercy, but
allowed the increased use of painkillers (8). Although, in 1994 Oregon passed their Death with
Dignity act, and with it came incredible amounts of backlash. Yet, in 2008 Washington state passed
the same act to legalize doctor assisted suicide. (10–12) In most people 's lives, they will experience
a moment of knowing death is near.

Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay
Is the role of a medical professional to ensure the well–being of their patients, or to assist them in
ending their lives? Many people may believe that physicians would never perform the latter, but in
actuality one practice does so. Physician assisted suicide is the intentional ending of one's life
brought on by lethal substances prescribed by a doctor. In the majority of cases, the patient is
terminally ill and simply does not desire to live any longer. Their physician provides the medication
necessary to end their life. Many supporters aver that this practice is merely an act of compassion as
terminally ill persons may suffer extreme pain that eradicates any will to live. They also assert that
the decision to die is of the patient's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Joe Messerli, "Assisting in suicides would be a violation of that oath, and it would
lead to a weakening of doctor–patient trust" (3). If doctors violate the oath, especially the above
stated portions, patients may be inclined to question what other standards of medicine are being
breached. Assisted suicides contravene medical ethics, as evidenced by the multiple violations of the
Hippocratic Oath.
Furthermore, the practice of assisted suicide has a significant possibility of being abused. Assisted
suicides are designed to allow those who are seriously ill and suffer from extreme pain to easily end
their lives (Braddock and Tenelli 1). Those who lack support from members of their family or
friends may feel worthless and hence may desire to end their lives (Pretzer 2). If the patient has no
loved ones to confide to and receive support from, they may feel as if no one cares and therefore no
reason to live exists. Since assisted suicides are unregulated, doctors may allow patients wishing to
die for subordinate reasons, such as the one previously stated, instead of suffering reasons to commit
suicide. Moreover, "Patients who want to die for psychological or emotional reasons could convince
doctors to help them end their lives" (Messerli 3). As stated before, assisted suicides are not meant
to allow those with emotional or mental problems to end their lives. If someone has such problems,
they should

Assisted Suicide
FDENG 101
July 12, 2010 A Time to Die Matthew Donnelly was a young man who fully appreciated the beauty
of being alive. He had several friends and a brilliant mind that helped him do priceless research in
the field of X–rays. Everything about his life seemed to be normal. He was young, and his hopes for
the future were full of excitement and dreams that appeared very likely to come true. However, a
day that Matthew had never before anticipated was now reality before his eyes. Shockingly, at age
30, Matthew Donnelly was diagnosed with a brutal case of skin cancer. Suddenly, his mind was
bombarded with unanswered questions that seemed to flourish and infuse every beat of his heart
with fear. Instead of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It does not take much to look around and see how much medicine has developed over the years.
Scenarios involving certain illnesses that at sometime in the past seemed to be hopeless have been
studied and treatments carefully developed. Many medical discoveries have been made, and many
are the lives that have been spared because of such. On the other hand, however, it is undeniable that
there are many forms of physical disorder that still cannot be fully explained by medicine.
Extremely knowledgeable researchers and devoted doctors have been grappling with problems such
as cancer and AIDS for decades, yet nothing has been discovered or developed further enough to
completely cure these and also many other forms of deadly illnesses.
It is not possible to imagine the everyday life of a person plagued with terminal illness. Not only is
their burden incomparably heavy, but also that of their family and friends who are forced to watch a
loved one suffer over long periods of time. The Journal of Medical Ethics, one of the world's most
respected voices in the field of medicine, attempted to explore the experience of 18 people fighting
against a terminal illness and make known the opinion of patients who are the main "target" of any
decision made over this issue. A young female patient suffering from chronic obstructive lung
disease emphasized her desire to be in control of her own life and be given the right to choose death
over life. She said, "I

Doctor Assisted Suicide : The Moral And Immoral Rights Essay
Doctor Assisted Suicide Doctor–assisted suicide helps numerous people with life threatening
illnesses die in peace. Brittany Maynard is the most recent case that deals with the moral and
immoral rights of doctor–assisted suicide. Other doctors helped their patients, however they did not
publicize the action being done to help. Doctor Kevorkian was the first doctor that did not hide as to
how he would help his patients that were terminally ill. Doctor assisted suicide is frowned upon by a
variety of people. Despite this social viewpoint, doctor–assisted suicide is a freedom available to the
terminally ill.
Doctor Jack Kevorkian was the doctor that started the movement that gave citizens the opportunity
to no longer suffer with terminal illnesses. Kevorkian was born in Michigan and went to University
of Michigan Medical School, where he specialized in pathology. Pathology is the branch of
medicine that is concerned with the causes of death and disease where doctors perform autopsies
(Langwith 1). While other doctors helped their patients secretively, Kevorkian was not a doctor who
secretly helped his patients. Kevorkian started advertising "... in the Detroit newspapers in 1987 as a
physician consultant for 'death counseling'" (Langwith 1). This allowed more people who needed
help to get the opportunity to find a doctor that was willing to help and ask the questions necessary.
Langwith says that, "In 1990, Janet Adkins, flipped the switch on the mercitron killing machine,

Free Doctor Assisted Suicide Within Canada
In late February 2016, a recent debate among Canadian politicians arose on whether mature minors
have the right to access doctor–assisted suicide within Canada. In Canadian Paediatric Society1
article, it explains how the government has a three–year deadline in order to create new legislation.
However, the the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) believes that this three–year deadline Is not
enough time to "gather adequate and appropriate information" on whether this practice should be
allowed to be extended to minors under the age of 18. Currently, the CPS believes that it will be
very hard to develop any data the experience of physician–assisted deaths among adults, within the
next 3 years. The CPS stated that "Without that data, and a great deal of other information, it is
premature to set a deadline for enacting legislation" (2016). The CBC brought up valuable points to
the cause, firstly that age is 'arbitrary'. Dr. Smith stated in the CBC article that there are some people
who are 21, while there are those that are 14, and have the maturity to give consent, he went on to
explain that he feels that this topic should go to even younger children. Later in the article
Conservative MP Mike Cooper said that this was "illogical" and that those not old enough to vote
should not have the right to choose if they live or die. The CBC went on to reiterate what the CPS
article was about, saying that with such little data on the subject, and with two very distinct sides to
this ethical

Essay on Physician-Assisted Suicide
Suicide is one person's personal decision; physician–assisted suicide is a patient who is not capable
of carrying the task out themselves asking a physician for access to lethal medication. What people
may fail to see however is that the physician is not the only healthcare personnel involved; it may
include, but is not limited to, a physician, nurse, and pharmacist. This may conflict with the
healthcare worker's own morals and there are cases in which the patient suffers from depression, or
the patient is not receiving proper palliative care. Allowing physician–assisted suicide causes the
physician to become entangled in an ethical and moral discrepancy and has too many other issues
surrounding it for it to be legal. Physician–assisted ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Physician–assisted suicide was first made legal in the state of Oregon. (Hendin) In cases of
euthanasia, physicians often give lethal doses of a medication to terminate a patient's life because
they're experiencing intolerable pain. Patients who wish to use the Death with Dignity law in
Oregon must be eighteen or older, must be a resident of Oregon, and they must be able to make their
own health care decisions. (Sharp 53) However, the law does not require the patient to be in
unmanageable pain, they must just have a prognosis of less than six months to live. (Sharp 54) This
law seems to be in place to kill patients more quickly to open up hospital space, instead of
compassionately ending someone's suffering.
Oregon's physicians are required by law to recommend hospice and palliative care, but are often not
qualified, therefore only thirteen percent of dying patients get to hear their alternatives. (Hendin)
Oregon also does not require a psychiatric evaluation when a patient makes a request for suicide.
(Hendin) Studies have shown that 13–77% of patients who request assisted suicide are suffering
from depression; however, psychiatrists believe that depression is a normal response to a severe
illness. (Boyd) Also, patients who are aware they are going to receive a psychological evaluation
which may allow them to commit suicide may lie during the evaluation so that they seem fine.

Assisted Suicide Research Paper
After researching assisted suicide I have more questions than when I started. The definition of
assisted suicide is very factual: suicide facilitated by another person, especially a physician, who
organized the logistics of the suicide, as by providing the necessary quantities of a poison (The
definition of assisted suicide 2016). After much research I have learned that assisted suicide is an
option one has to make depending on their moral standards, will to live, and how they want to die
rather than a factual process one can follow. Assisted suicide is currently legal in five states:
Oregon, Vermont, Washington, California and Montana (Physician–Assisted Suicide Fast Facts
2016). Each state differs in the process toward obtaining physician assisted suicide approval, but all
follow the generic rule that one must have the mental capability to communicate their own decisions
regarding their terminal illness (How to Access and Use Death with Dignity Laws 2016). I question
how one can truly make such a decision for themselves if they are in pain from their terminal
illness. In California they have the rule that one must submit two oral requests, each fifteen days
apart, and a written request to the attending physician (Physician–Assisted Suicide Fast Facts 2016).
I feel this is a great way of avoiding patients who may be making this decision based off of
impulsive drives and decisions. Other guidelines to being eligible for assisted suicide includes that
one must be eighteen

Pros And Cons Of Assisted Suicide
Debate Paper
On the positive side of assisted suicide, it is strongly believed that the right to assisted suicide
allows the terminally ill to have a clean and fair death. No one wants to live with pain and sorrow.
From their perspective, doctor's help the suffering and terminally ill to die when they choose is
nothing wrong. From what they had argued, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
allows people the right to freedom of speech, press, petition, religion. With this logic, it would be
reasonable to believe that you are allowed to have the right to die. The right to assisted suicide can
help the patients with the terminally ill to release from pain and suffering, reduce the damaging
financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to
determine their own fate.
However, on the negative side of the assisted suicide debate, It is argued that a physician's goal is to
help their patient get the proper care and help they need in order to get better and heal; it should not
be through killing them. From Procon.org, In Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington, it was
stated that physician assisted suicides acts as a slippery slope to those who aren't terminally ill and
will take advantage of it. Once we allow assisted suicides, it opens the way to offering it to people
who are no longer mentally competent. And then to people who are in distress but not terminally ill.
So this is saying that if anyone suffered

Physician Assisted Suicide
Imagine a cancer patient on a short rode to death. The pain this patient is experiencing is unreal and
unimaginable to most. The pain medicine that can be used does little to take the agony away. The
doctors can put the patient in an induced coma, but what kind of living is that? It is not living. The
patient does not want to go on. Is it so wrong to ask for a way out? With less than six months to live,
the patient's hope is gone. Many argue that euthanasia is not ethical, but is it really ethical to let
someone live in constant, horrifying pain and agony? While in some cases having the right to die
might result in patients giving up on life, physician–assisted suicide should be legalized in all fifty
states for terminally ill patients with worsening or unbearable pain.
What is physician–assisted suicide? "Suicide is the act of taking one's own life. In assisted suicide,
the means to end a patient's life is provided to the patient (i.e. medication or a weapon) with
knowledge of the patient's intention" (American Nurses Association). Physician–assisted suicide is
known by many names such as death with dignity, right to die, and of course, euthanasia. Euthanasia
is a much more in–depth term concerning the patient and the type of suicide.
Euthanasia, often called "mercy killing", is the act of putting to death someone suffering from a
painful and prolonged illness or injury. Euthanasia means that someone other than the patient
commits an action with the intent to

Brittany Marynard, at the age of twenty–nine, is diagnosed with brain cancer and is told she has six
months to live. She considers receiving treatment, but learns the side effects would be extremely
harsh. After considering passing away in hospice care she quickly changes her mind to seeking
assistance in ending her life (Maynard). Brittany is just one out of many individuals seeking medical
assistance to end their lives. Many people want assistance in ending their lives because they want to
die with dignity. Assisted suicide should be legalized in all states because it shows no evidence of a
slippery slope, frees an individual from suffering, and potentially saves on healthcare costs.
To better understand why assisted suicide should be legal in all states, one must consider the
opposition. Many argue the legalization of assisted suicide devalues human life. However, there are
strict guidelines in place that prevent individuals from taking advantage. According to Kenneth R.
Stevens, professor and Chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology at OHSU, "[... the patient
must have less than six months to live]"(Rogatz). This means there is careful consideration involved
in whether to end a life, therefore not a decision taken lightly.
One reason assisted suicide should be legalized in all states is that it has lacks evidence of a slippery
slope. A slippery slope would be a dramatic increase in deaths in a country due to the legalization of
assisted suicide. According to Dr.

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide are actions at the core of what it means to be human – the
moral and ethical actions that make us who we are, or who we ought to be. Euthanasia, a subject
known in the twenty–first century, is subject to many discussions about ethical permissibility, which
date back to as far as ancient Greece and Rome. It was not until the Hippocratic School removed the
practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide from medical practice. Euthanasia in itself raises many
ethical dilemmas – such as, is it ethical for a doctor to assist a terminally ill patient in ending his
life? Under what circumstances, if any, is euthanasia considered ethically appropriate? More so,
euthanasia raises the argument of the different ideas that people have about the value of the human
experience.
Ezekial Emanuel asserts that the ethical belief, thoughts in the 19th and 20th century in the United
States are reminiscent of those today, both in terms of content and ferocity. Emanuel adds that
interest in euthanasia arises historically and predictably from (1) economic recession or in
movements of Social Darwinism; (2) doctors are engaged in a struggle with society over their
medical–authority and profession; and (3) terminating life–sustaining practices become part of
standard medical practice, and there is a desire then to extend this to active euthanasia.
Arguably, all three situations met by the end of the 20th century. The rise of managed care, the
increase of

The Rights Of Physician Assisted Suicide
The Right to Die
By:
Antony Makhlouf
Antony Makhlouf
PHR 102–006 Contemporary Moral Issues
Final Paper
The Right to Die Physician–assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia, has been a hot topic as of
late. If you do not know what this is, physician–assisted suicide is the taking of ones life. This
usually occurs when a patient is in a irreversible state, and must live through a tube. With multiple
cases occurring in the past, current and the more to occur the in the future, this looks to remain a hot
topic. Some of those cases include Terri Schiavo, and Scott Thomas, which have both resulted in
court cases and conversation all around the globe. Physician–assisted suicide is one of those topics
that can be looked at multiple ways, and have multiple different solutions. Someone could look and
justify it through the lens of Natural law and could bring up the doctrine of double effects, or the
preservation of human life. Another person could go against it by using utilitarianism and could
bring up how it maximizes the good, and produces the greatest overall good. Whether you find it to
be murder/suicide or just a smarter decision if you cannot life properly, you must realize this is an
issue that does need to be discussed more. Even with the attention it has gotten, it still is not
discussed politically, and is not up there with other popular topics in our media today. If someone is
in a state where he or she has to live off a tube is he or she really even alive?

The Ethics Of Physician Assisted Suicide
According to Mirror News, In October of 2014 a women named Charlotte Fitzmaurice Wise was
watching her daughter Nancy Fitzmaurice suffer from pain. She was born with Hydrocephalus and
septicaemia which made it impossible for her to walk, talk, eat or drink. She required around the
clock care and was fed through tubes. As time went on her health worsened and she would scream
in pain even though she was injected with morphine. Wise believed that her daughter was in
excruciating pain and deserved to be at peace. Wise submitted an application to end her daughter's
misery, and soon her application would be approved. She was able to relieve her daughter from
pain, and made it legal in the United Kingdom for a parent to end their critically ill child's life if
they are disable and can't speak for themselves.
People have been questioning the ethics of physician assisted suicide since the late 18th century.
According to medicinenet the definition of physician assisted suicide is "the voluntary termination
of one 's own life by administrating a lethal substance with the direct assistance of a physician."
This would typically come into play if/when a critically ill patient wants to end their suffering.
Confirming with the State–by–State Guide to Physician–Assisted Suicide, 5 states have
Paquin 2
Legalized physician assisted suicide. California, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington have made it
legal by legislation, and Maine has made it legal by a court ruling. The remaining 45 states

Physician Assisted Suicide: The Right to Choose
Did you know, about 57% of physicians today have received a request for physician assisted suicide
due to suffering from a terminally ill patient. Suffering has always been a part of human existence,
and these requests have been occurring since medicine has been around. Moreover, there are two
principles that all organized medicine agree upon. The first one is physicians have a responsibility to
relieve pain and suffering of dying patients in their care. The second one is physicians must respect
patients' competent decisions to decline life–sustaining treatment. Basically, these principles state
the patients over the age of 18 that are mentally stable have the right to choose to end their life if
they are suffering from pain. As of right ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A patient must meet the requirements in order to qualify for physician assisted suicide. The patient
must be "diagnosed with a terminal illness that will lead to death within six months" (Fass, and Fass
846). Being a legal resident of a state that has legalized the procedure and being eighteen years old
are also requirements. Another qualification is being able to make and communicate health care
decisions. Along with those requirements, there are certain guidelines that must be followed during
the process of physician assisted suicide. First, the patient must make two oral requests for
physician assisted suicide at least fifteen days apart. A written request that has to be signed in front
of two witnesses must also be provided to the physician. The patient then has to be referred to a
consulting physician, so that he can confirm the diagnosis and prognosis and approve that the
patient is capable of making decisions related to health care. "The prescribing physician must notify
the patient of alternatives to suicide, including comfort care, hospice care, and pain management"
(Fass, and Fass 846). It is expected of the physician to encourage the patient to tell their family. The
physician has to follow rules to dispense the medication after these steps. One rule is to be
registered as a dispensing practitioner and maintaining a current Drug Enforcement Administration
certificate in order

Physician’s Assisted Suicide
Imagine yourself lying in bed at the hospital hooked up to all sorts of machines that are just barely
keeping you alive. Imagine the pain and suffering you are in on a daily bass and the medication
being given to you isn't cutting it any longer and all the doctors and nurses can do for you is just
keep you comfortable. The doctors have literally given you no chance of survival and death is
imminent. You have taken the time you have left to say your good–byes, came to terms with dying,
and you are ready to leave this world. If you could choose to end your life instead of wasting away,
would you take advantage of it? Death is the inevitable fate of all humans. When facing death, the
question may arise as to whether or not third parties ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When a patient is laying in a hospital bed in pain and the medication no longer helps, the doctors
and nurses can no longer help except to try and make the patient as comfortable as possible; why not
let them choose to end their life. When the patient is forced to endure agonizing pain even though
they want to die, some decided to end their lives on their own ending in a more traumatic and messy
outcome then a humane injection or pill that will take away their pain and let them slip away easily.
In my opinion there is no reason to suffer endlessly waiting on their imminent death, why not let a
physician who knows what he/she is doing help the patient to end their lives on their own terms.
The government cannot stop suicide from happening, there are people all over the U.S. that end
their lives for a reason. Telling a patient who knows he/she will die sooner than later due to their
illness that they cannot end their lives gives that patient in some cases a feeling of loss of power.
When an adult is told by younger doctors and nurses that they are not to end their lives, it pushes
some over the edge and they end up wanting to end their lives in their own way. When taking their
lives into their own hands it can become messy and traumatic. Giving the terminally ill adults the
power back to choose when they want to go and how they want to go makes their ending of life
much more peaceful. The patient that is able to choose death

Assisted Suicide Speech
Some people think that assisted suicide should be legal and some people think it should not be legal.
This issue is serious because if the Supreme Court does change the law and make it legal then
people will use assisted suicide as an excuse to get help in ending their lives. Our views as a society
have not changed because we still think killing someone is murder and when someone is killed we
think that person should be put in jail. So if society thinks people should not commit murder then
what is the difference between murder and assisted suicide? There isn't one. Yes when someone
requests assisted suicide they want to their lives to end but that should not give us the right to go
around and kill anyone who wants to die. Committing murder ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If Canadians know that it is against the law to assist in someone's suicide why do they do it anyway?
If the law is changed then more people will go and assist someone in killing themselves. If a person
wants to kill themselves then they are obviously in a bad state of mind. Section 7 of the Charter is
supposed to make everyone feel secure. So instead of letting that person commit suicide we should
protect that person and get that person help, whether it be getting them some sort of therapy or
getting that person medication to keep them feeling better for that period of time. Many Canadians
are charged for helping someone ill or someone they love die. Marielle Houlle, for example, is a
lady that was sentenced to get three years probation by a Quebec court in 2004 because she helped
her 36–year–old son, who was in pain from multiple sclerosis, end his life (CBC, 2014). Another
one of my concerns with assisted suicide is that some people might use it as a cover up for killing
another person. If a person shoots someone and ends another their life that person can serve up to 14
years in prison. Yet this lady only gets 3 years probation for ending her sons life. This was a
controversial decision as it was not considered fair by many people. The law should just stay the
same and anyone who kills someone else should get an appropriate

A Research Study On Physician Assisted Suicide
Living Proof, Miss Evers Boys, and You Don't Know Jack are all movies based off of true events.
These three movies all faced ethical and unethical events. Living Proof has to do with a
compassionate research doctor that is trying to get a drug for breast cancer called Herceptin
approved through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This Film has some unethical and
ethical events take place like favoritism, the funding, and of course the process to get FDA approval.
Miss Evers Boys had several unethical events occur during the Tuskegee study. This study was to
see if black men had the same symptoms to syphilis as the white men did. In this film the providers
lied to their patients, broke confidentiality, and misrepresented theirself. You Don't Know Jack is a
film about physician assisted suicide. Is it ethical to be able to end your life at any given point and
time that you want? Should be allowed to legalized physician assisted suicide Jack is the physician
in this movie that believes very strong in people being able to have the assistants of a physician to
end their own life.
Living Proof is a great film in my opinion. Dr. Slamon is a very compassionate doctor and never
gave up on his research or his beliefs. He made a lot of sacrifices when it came to family time while
he was trying to development Herceptin and going through the process of getting it approved
through FDA. When trying to get something FDA approved it can be tricky due to so many
eligibility

Legalization of Assisted Suicide Debate

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Alyssa Schulte

More from Alyssa Schulte (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Legalization of Assisted Suicide Debate