Seizing the Agenda | Establishing a shared culture between schools
1. From Raising the Floor to Raising the Ceiling
Whole Education 6th Annual Conference
Twitter | @WholeEducation
#Seizingtheagenda
Establishing a shared vision for school
improvement
Seizing the Agenda
2. Wakefield City Academy
Our Journey
Marie Hunter – Co Headteacher/NLE/Senior Director -
WCAT
Suzanne Austwick – Co Headteacher/NLE/Head of
Teaching School (WRTSA)
3. Distributed Leadership
Co Headteachers - September 2010
Fast track Convertor Academy - January 2011
National Teaching School – April 2012
Wakefield City Academies Trust – August 2013
Structure of Leadership team
Alan Yellup - CEO
2 Co Headteachers Marie – Senior Director of WCAT
Suzanne – Head of WRTSA
1 Deputy Headteacher
3 Assistant Headteachers
1 Business Manager
4. Creating A Positive Culture
By:
stressing EPM not ECM
winning the staff & students
consult and listen – open door policy
not top down
make staff feel valued
distributing leadership
identifying movers & shakers
using Influence not Power
establishing a no fear culture
taking risks
focusing on the positives – praise
5. Our beliefs
hands on/ lead from the front
not what you say but how you say it
raise standards with dignity – not coercion
or threat
communication
never complacent
team- in it together
have a sense of humour !
6. WCAT
Challenges
• retention of staff
• drawing on the academy
• time management
• retaining ‘Outstanding’
• expectations
• autonomy
7. What works for us !
communication- us
- SLT
- trust meetings
SLEs, Associate SLEs
prioritise City
recognising the benefits
Sense of humour !
8. Culture and leadership
across the MAT
Alan – prior to conversion
Lead staff from City
Base at City
new recruits
huge team for support
9. Same v different
insist on same principles
develop the same culture
develop a positive ethos
high expectation
autonomy – name, uniform,
procedures/ practices
local governing body
11. • Previously Orton Longueville School – ex-grammar school with a
good reputation in Peterborough
• Below 40% A*-CEM since before 2003
• Falling roll – built for 1100, 785 on roll and dropping. PAN 180, Sept
2010 we had 52 first choices
• 35% EAL
• Poor ethos
• Poor curriculum
• Poor standards
• CMAT joined in Sept 2009 (1 person, 1 day/week) on a gaining
ground project
• Easter 2010, CMAT took over the leadership of the school
• Sept 2010, CMAT Principal, Vice Principal, + 5 other staff
• Using the support of the Trust was critical
Nene Park Academy
12. • Outward facing
– National Challenge support school
– Gaining Ground Support school
– SSAT involvement at many levels
– Work for and with the LA
– Involved with BSF for LA
• Developmental
– Introduced distributed leadership
– House model (personalisation)
– Curriculum model (personalisation)
• Built Capacity
Swavesey Village College
13. • Immediate fixes
– New Bodies who ‘get it’ – The Core Intervention Team
– Existing bodies who quickly ‘pick it up’
– Staff structural change
– Student support structural change
– Curriculum change
– Expectations
Grafting the Model
14. • Peterborough United
• Nene Park
• Local business
• LA support/partnership
• Other schools
• EAL
Using the Context
15. • Longer term issues
– Academisation
– Sustainability of the model at NPA
– Developing the MAT through partnership
• Lead from the front
– School to School support (Triads)
– SCITT
– Teaching School
– Peterborough Learning Partnership
– PRS management group
Grafting the Model
16. • PLEDGES & Inclusion
– Take the idea and improve it within the context
• Develop and share
– LinC2, 3 yr KS4,
The Return Journey
17. • Results
– 2011, 44%; 2012, 49%; 2013, 60% (in old money)
– First Oxbridge entrant this year
• Ethos
– Ofsted ‘Good’ in all categories
– Took in 200 yr7 this year at the request of LA
– 185 first choices for 2016
• Partnerships
– Schools
– Business
– Parents
• Confidence
The Impact
Editor's Notes
The context
Standards – low expectations from students and staff
- outcomes were poor; a self fulfilling prophesy
Reputation - from previous heights, it was now very much the bottom of the pile
- PAN 180 – 5s first choices – and they, generally were because it was the nearest and parents hadn’t looked at the results/didn’t care
City Support - School looked inwards and didn’t accept support
- city took advantage; I had space and so it got all the issues – challenging children/ new arrivals/ high level of churn
- buildings were collapsing; now we have a new building, 3 fires in the last term before we moved out.
Academy Sept 2011,
Refurb in place Sept 2012
New build Sept 2013
Overview of what we were exporting, in terms of the model….
But;
Village College vs City School
APS on entry of 31+ Vs 25+
Parental support Vs 36% EAL parents and 50% not interested
Established staff and structures Vs Chaos
Established partners to work with Vs isolated
7 staff ‘moved in’ [ still have 5 of the 7] 1 now a Principal in another new school, and one of the 5 remaining is a ‘returner’ following promotion
New structures (re-structuring) allows the movement of staff into the right seats
House system – allowed a new student identity – driven by newly re-invigorated staff
Change to Academy after 1 year allowed a new Uniform and another boost of energy
Change to the curriculum (appropriate for the context) started the increase in results and the increase in belief (for students and some of the slower staff
Change what doesn’t work – EAL approach!
Expectations increased from the outset – House system again drove this forward
POSH – students and curriculum
Nene Park – Curriculum and governance
Local Business – Governance and curriculum
LA – development and governance
PPSS – S2S and partnership working
Applying the context – diversity; PLEDGES – a whole new meaning
Becoming an academy allowed us to ‘go again’
Staff relaxed once the immediate danger had passed – now pushing for the best possible – change expectations – good enough isn’t good enough!
Developing a model for the schools to work together – CMAT groups – not in competition but working together
Results – the pathway we can see – now going ni the right direction with progress measures as well
Ofsted – parents/schools/students/staff (Elle Johnson)
Partnerships;
Schools; - teaching support – observations/coaching
- data analysis
- updates and breadth of ‘experience’
Business - curriculum enhancement – PLEDGES and futures days
- Careers development
- mock interviews
- Governance
Parents - competition for governance
- positive feedback
Confidence;
Students’ Staff, parents, community, recruitment becoming easier
A stronger MAT with new schools picking up and improving on the development at NPA…