Induction Training AEO

2.  Presented by:
Muhammad Javaid Rafiq
District Education Officer (EE-M)
Multan

3.  School Education Department comes under
the Jurisdiction of Govt. Of Punjab
 Minister of Education over-all Supervises the
department

4. Minister for
Education
ADDL. SECY
(ER)
DY. SECY (ER)
ADDL. SECY.
(SCHOOLS)
DY. SECY
(A&C)
DY. SECY (EE) DY. SECY
ADDL. SECY
(DEA)
ADDL. SECY
(GENERAL)
ADDL. (B & P)
Secretary SED
Special
Secretary SED

6. Legislation, policy formulation and planning
 The following are the legislation, policy formulation
and planning areas of the School Education
Department:
 Primary education
 Elementary education
 Secondary and Higher Secondary education

7.  Director Public Instruction (Secondary Education)
Administrative and establishment matters Seniority &
Promotion (Male & Female) teaching & ministerial
staff of BS-17 & above, Coordination among the
districts, Budget and Planning.
 Director Public Instruction (Elementary Education)
Administrative and establishment matters (Male &
Female) teaching & ministerial staff of BS-1 to 16,
Coordination among the districts, Budget and
Planning

8.  Directorate of Staff Development (DSD)
Teachers’ training programme, CPD frame work,
Cluster Training Support Centres, District Training
Support Centres, Establishment matters of DTEs,
Developing teachers training modules.

9.  Children Library Complex Punjab Critical thinking
development in children through the provision of
educational and recreational services, Educational services,
recreational services, expansion of Children’s Library
complex services, Children Library Complex
administration.
 Punjab Education Assessment System (PEAS) Implement
National Education Assessment activities in Punjab, Assess
students learning achievement level in the Province on the
basis of sample, Develop instruments for learning
assessment, Identify strong and weak areas of students
learning with reference to National Curriculum and target
competencies, Disseminate findings to the stake holders
so that they may contribute in improving the quality of
Education.

10.  Punjab Curriculum Authority
 Punjab Examination Commission (PEC)
 Punjab Education Foundation
 Punjab Teachers Foundation
 The Danish Schools Authority (DSA)

11. 30 June 2015

12.  Pre DRC
 DRC

13. 13
• The new district ranking system
• Core indicators
• Retention indicators
• Infrastructure indicators
• Management & monitoring
indicators
• Administrative ranking system

14. 14
Administrative
indicators
Quality
indicators
1 2 coaching visits per school
2 Separate quality ranking based on this indicator for district which is not part of the quarterly rating used for
bonus award
1
2
 Categorized into Core, Retention, Infrastructure
and Monitoring & management indicators
 Sub categorized into 13 metrics
 Focus mainly on achieving administrative
excellence at the school level
 Top performing districts to be rewarded financially
 Consists of 4 metrics
 Focus mainly on accessing quality of Learning &
Education at the school level

15. 15
Core indicators
3
Student attendance (1-12)1
Teacher presence2
Functioning facilities3
Administrator visits4
MEA visits
2 Overcrowding and multigrade (OCMG) due to classrooms
Infrastructure
indicators
1 Overcrowding and multigrade (OCMG) due to teachers
3 Dangerous building
Monitoring &
management
indicators
2 DTE visits1
1 AEO span of control
Retention
indicators
1 Student attendance (Kachi)
2 Retention (Kachi)
3 Student attendance (1-5)
4 Retention (1-5)
Not
included
in district
rankings
1 2 coaching visits per school
A
C
D
B
1

16. Definitions ValueMetrics1
Functioning facilities
Teacher presence
Student attendance (Kachi)
Retention (Kachi)
Student attendance (1-5)
Retention (1-5)
OCMG due to teachers
OCMG due to classrooms
Dangerous buildings
AEO span of control
DTE visits
Functioning & available facilities2 as a % of total required facilities
Teachers present as a % of total teachers
Student present as % of total students enrolled
Current enrolment as % of baseline enrolment retained
Student present as % of total students enrolled
Current enrolment as % of baseline enrolment retained
Student present as % of total students enrolled
Schools with inadequate3 number of primary teachers as a % of total schools4
Schools with inadequate3 number of classrooms as a % of total schools4
Schools with dangerous buildings as a % of total schools
Average number of schools per AEO
% of schools with adequate3 number of coaching visits by DTEs
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
A2
A3
B1
B2
B3
B4
C1
C2
C3
D1
D2
Student attendance (1-12) 1A1
District administrator visits % of schools4 visited by district administrators 1A4
1 All the metrics are calculated on a monthly basis
2 Includes electricity, boundary wall, drinking water and toilets
3 Step function defined in the backup section of the document
4 with primary section
Core
Retention
Infra-
structure
Monitoring &
Management
Indicators
1

17. 17SOURCE: PMIU
3.5
3.5
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.5
6.5
6.5
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.5
7.5
7.5
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.5
NAROWAL
RAJANPUR
RAWALPINDI
D.G. KHAN
RAHIMYAR KHAN
FAISALABAD
SIALKOT
ATTOCK
BHAKKAR
KHUSHAB
OKARA
MIANWALI
GUJRANWALA
SHEIKHUPURA
LAHORE
MUZAFFARGARH
LAYYAH
GUJRAT
JHANG
BAHAWALNAGAR
HAFIZABAD
PAKPATTAN
T.T.SINGH
NANKANA SAHIB
CHINIOT
LODHRAN
CHAKWAL
KASUR
MANDI BAHA UD DIN
KHANEWAL
MULTAN
JHELUM
VEHARI
BAHAWALPUR
SARGODHA
SAHIWAL
Performance (out of 13)
District
1 Based on average score of April & May
Average district score, baseline1

18. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
On or above target
Below target by less than or equal to
2%
Below target by more than 4%
Total students present
divided by the total
enrolment (as per class
register)
Calculation
Baseline
Average student
attenance for 2014
2018
Target
Districts classified into
three categories of
performance (high,
moderate & low) and
targets assigned
accordingly (90%, 88% &
85%)
Student present as a % of
total students enrolled
Definition
Metric detail
Below target by more than 2% but
less than or equal to 4%

19. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
Greater than or equal to 90%
Less than 90% but greater than or
equal to 88%
Less than 86%
2018
Target
90%
Teachers present as a % of
total teachers
Definition
Metric detail
Less than 88% but greater than or
equal to 86%
Definition
Average teacher
presence for 2014
Baseline

20. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
On or above
target
Below target by
less than or
equal to 1.5%
Below target by
greater than 3%
Baseline
Peak month enrolment
for current school year
2018
Target
Reduce dropout to lower
of the following:
▪ Retention floor
– Kachi: 7%
– Grade 1-5: 13%
▪ 50% of a district’s
baseline dropout1 rate
Current enrolment as a %
of baseline enrolment
Definition
1 Drop out is calculated as the difference between month with highest enrolment and any subsequent month with lowest enrolment, based on enrollment from 2012-2013,
2013-2014, 2014-2015 – All enrolment figures are adjusted for MEA coverage
Metric detail
Below target by
greater than 1.5%
but less than or
equal to 3%
On or above
target
Below target by
less than or
equal to 3%
Below target by
greater than 6%
Below target by
greater than 3%
but less than or
equal to 6%
Kachi Grade 1-5

21. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
2018
Target
90%
% of schools1 visited by
district administrators
Definition
Metric detail
Greater than or equal to 90%
Less than 90% but greater than or
equal to 88%
Less than 86%
Less than 88% but greater than or
equal to 86%
1 With primary section

22. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
2018
Target
0% of schools with
overcrowding and
multigrade due to
teachers
% of schools with
inadequate1 number of
primary school teachersDefinition
Metric detail
Less than or equal to 5%
Greater than 5% but less than or
equal to 25%
Greater than 50%
Greater than 25% but less than or
equal to 50%
1 0-30 enrolment: 2 teachers, 30-45 enrolment: 3 teachers, 45-180 enrolment: 4 teachers, 180-300 enrolment: 6 teachers, 300-400
enrolment: 8 teachers, >400 enrolment : primary STR of 50

23. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
2018
Target
0% of schools with
overcrowding and
multigrade due to
classrooms
% of schools with
inadequate1 number of
classroomsDefinition
Metric detail
Less than or equal to 5%
Greater than 5% but less than or
equal to 25%
Greater than 50%
Greater than 25% but less than or
equal to 50%
1 0-30 enrolment: 2 classrooms, 30-45 enrolment: 3 classrooms, 45-150 enrolment: 4 classrooms, 150-230 enrolment: 6 classrooms, 230-
310 enrolment: 8 classrooms, >310 enrolment: total enrolment/50

24. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
2018
Target
Functioning & available
facilities as a % of total
required facilities1Definition
Metric detail
1 Each school should have 4 facilities including electricity, boundary wall, drinking water and toilets.Total possible is a product of 4 and the
total number of schools
95% of total possible
facilities should be
functional and available
Greater than or equal to 95%
Less than 95% but greater than or
equal to 90%
Less than 85%
Less than 90% but greater than or
equal to 85%

25. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
2018
Target
Schools with dangerous1
buildings as a % of total
schoolsDefinition
Metric detail
• 0% of dangerous
buildings in a district
• Intermediary target
of 2% in June 2016
Less than or equal to 1%
Greater than 1% but less than or
equal to 2%
Greater than 5%
Greater than 2% but less than or
equal to 5%
1 Defined as life threating to teachers or/and students, further details in the “Training on dangerous building” document for MEAs

26. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
Less than or equal to 251
Greater than 25 but less than or
equal to 27
Greater than 28
2018
Target
232
Average number of
schools per AEO
Definition
Metric detail
Greater than 27 but less than or
equal to 28
1 The districts are allowed a 10% deviation from target
2 Conditional upon hiring of additional 1000 AEOs

27. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
2018
Target
% of schools with
adequate1 number of
coaching visits by a DTEDefinition
Metric detail
90%
Greater than or equal to 90%
Less than 90% but greater than or
equal to 85%
Less than 80%
Less than 85% but greater than or
equal to 80%
1 Defined as two visits per school

28. Source: Team analysis
Evaluation criteria
2018
Target
% of correct responses
by students
Definition
Metric detail
85%
Greater than or equal to 85%
Less than 85% but greater than or
equal to 75%
Less than 65%
Less than 75% but greater than or
equal to 65%

30.  Chief Minister’s Initiatives for Teachers
 Focus on Students
 Focus on Schools
 100% Enrolment to be ensured before 31st
October 2014
 100% Retention
 Ranking of Districts on Targets
 Ensuring Quality Education
 Governance
 Supportive Actions
 Merit Based Transfer Policy

31.  CM Stock-take meeting on 29 January
2015 and presided by Mian Shahbaz
Sharif Chief Minister of Punjab.
 LND/ASER Reports: 38% of class 3
students could not match the word
CHAIR with its picture.
 CM showed apprehension regarding
Quality Education in public schools

32. To increase Literacy (reading, writing while
improving common sense questions preparation of
students learning in natural set up) & Numeracy of
Grade 1-3 in Urdu, English and Mathematics
Improving Skills in English, Urdu and Mathematics
 Phonological awareness
 Word identification
 Composition
 Reading Comprehension
 Vocabulary
 Fluency
 Counting 1 – 100 (Urdu & English)
 Simple addition & subtraction through activity

33.  Secretary School Education took the
Quality Drive (QD) Initiative
 He proposed the need of imparting basic
learning (basic literacy & numeracy) to
the students of grade 1-3 in public
schools in the subjects of Urdu, English
and Mathematics

34.  Minimum standards of learning in primary
schools of Punjab
 Working Force: 4000 DTEs + 1000 AEOs
 There are 40, 000 stand alone PSs.
 They will adopt 2 schools each for 2 months
 COVER ALL 40, 000 SCHOOLS IN 8 MONTHS
 13,000 Heads of Elem&High Schools will
adopt their attached schools and implement
QD

35.  Article 25A of the constitution of Pakistan of
Compulsory Education
 Every Child will be given free education upto
secondary level.
 Scholarship will be given to needy students
and on merit base.
 Books will be provided by the government

36.  The Punjab Education and English Language
Initiative (PEELI) will assist the School
Education Department of the Government of
Punjab in Pakistan to help 300,000 Primary
(Grades 1-5) and Middle school (Grades 6-8)
use English to teach English and other
subjects. PEELI will be integrated into the
continuous professional development and
training. The aim of PEELI is to enable the
Punjab Government’s English Medium of
Instruction (MoI) policy to succeed.

37.  Public Private Partnership
 100% Enrollment
 Quality Education
 i. FAS
 ii. Voucher Scheme
 iii. New School Program
 iv. PSSP

38.  The Punjab Education Foundation (PEF) is a non-
profit government body working under the School
Education Department of the Government of
Punjab, Pakistan. It was established in 1991 to
promote and encourage education in private
institutes in Punjab. The Foundation was
restructured in 2004 to keep pace with the
changing requirements of the education sector in
Punjab. [1] Now, the vision of the Foundation is: “To
promote quality education through Public Private
Partnership
l

39.  Foundation Assisted School (FAS) is the
flagship program of the Punjab Education
Foundation. It encourages and promotes free
access to quality education through Public
Private Partnership.
 The financial assistance @ rate Rs.550/- for
primary level, Rs. 650 for elementary classes,
Rs.700/- for secondary arts classes and Rs.
800/- for secondary science classes, on per
child enrolment is provided to partner
schools every month.

40.  Current number of FAS partner schools is
more than 3000 (including 3 higher
secondary schools) while the number of
beneficiaries has risen to more than 14 lakh.
 Quality Assurance Test (QAT) results show
improvement in quality of education in FAS
partner schools. Financial assistance is
discontinued in case of partner school fails
consecutively in two Quality Assurance Tests
(QATs).

41.  he PEF Board of Directors designed Education
Voucher Scheme (EVS) for the slums/katchi
abadies in the province of Punjab
 The voucher is redeemable against payment
of fee in the private educational institutions.
 There has been an increase in enrolment of
students, regularity of attendance of students
in the schools.

42.  The Punjab Education Foundation (PEF) has
arranged free school education of 86,488
deserving male and female students under its
New School Program (NSP) in different districts of
the province. This initiative has been launched in
collaboration with 518 private partner schools in
these districts so that the deserving students
could improve their lives through gratis
education. NSP was launched in 5 selected
districts of Punjab namely, Chiniot, Lodhran,
Bahawalpur, Muzaffargarh and Rajanpur on 13
March 2008. Besides provision of monthly fee,
students enrolled in the NSP partner schools are
also provided with free text books.

43.  Under this program, low-performing public
sector schools will be run through private
partners to provide good quality education to
the students near to their doorsteps.
 No fee would be charged from the students in
the schools to be run through the PSSP.

44. Overview
 Punjab Examination Commission is an autonomous
body set up by the Government of the Punjab to
assess and examine students’ learning
achievements particularly of grade 5 and 8. PEC
started functioning in 2005 and in 2006 conducted
5th grade population examination for the first time
in the Province.

45. PEC develops tests and further gets them printed for the
districts of Punjab. The districts administer and score the
tests. PEC then prepares results for each district, about 2
to5 million students, both from public and private sector
schools appear in the examination every year.
Moreover, we prepare reports which serve teachers,
teacher educators and researchers for improving students’
learning. The data collected from 36 districts of the
province provides feedback to the system, policy making,
educational managers and teachers for improving
students’ learning.

46.  There was no public policy, commitment and
investment in ECE till late 1990s. It was for
the first time that National Education Policy
(1998-2010) mentioned ECE and called for
reintroduction of Katchi/Pre-Primary Class as
a formal class in Primary Schools.

47.  Induction level training of Newly recruited
Teachers/Officers
 Effective Pre-service
 In-service training of all cadre of Education
Teachers/ Administration

48.  On Spot Capacity Development
 Assessment
 Mentoring
 Assessment & Evaluation Based Ranking
 Training Need Assessment
 Professional Support to PSTs

49.  Re-Allocation/ Rationalization of Teachers
First 90 Students = 3 Teachers
Above Than 90 Students = 1 Teacher on 40 st.
Middle Section = 1.5 Teacher for 01Section
Re-Allocation of Furniture

50.  Cost Reduction (Free Education): Provision of
incentives/stipends for children of poor
families. Stipend for Girls in 15 Districts
 Community Involvement: School Councils
need to be mobilized and made functional.
Head teachers also need to be trained to
effectively engage community.

51.  UPE & USE SURVEY AND 100% ENROLLMENT
AND 100% RETENTION
 ENROLLEMENT OF WORKERS OF BRICK KILN
CHILDREN
 TO ERADICATE CHILD LABOUR IN THE
PROVINICE
 ALLOCATION OF NON SALARY BUDGET

52. Merit Based HRM:
 Specialized recruitment tests for teachers and
managers on the pattern of independent testing
services.
Retention of Quality Managers and Educationists:
 Security of tenure of key positions in the district,
and incentives for key managerial positions and
subject specialists in rural areas need to be
provided.