Lightning talk given at the 2017 Libraries at Cambridge conference.

1. Collaboration, Technology and Libraries
Meg Westbury, Wolfson College
@MegWestbury
Hello. I'm Meg Westbury, the librarian for Wolfson College. In this
presentation, I want to critique some notions of library-technology
use, using the results of a little study I did last autumn.

2. 1. So – three big ways of thinking about tools for searching and
managing information that I see a lot of are:
3 notions of information
technology
cc: Squeezyboy - https://www.flickr.com/photos/60052279@N00

3. One: 'technology is neutral.' As in: 'we just pick up a tool and use it.
And if our end users could just learn the correct way of using that
tool (such as a database) all would be well.' This is how I was taught
in library school, and it runs through much of our information skills
teaching.
Neutral
cc: LadyDragonflyCC - >;< - https://www.flickr.com/photos/19646481@N06
Neutral

4. Two: 'technology as deterministic.' Here, biases in the technology
such as algorithms and filter bubbles control our search behaviour.
Such algorithms are there, of course, and are something we need to
be highly critical of, but the notion here is of technology as a force
actively to work against.
Deterministic
cc: B Tal - https://www.flickr.com/photos/68634595@N00

5. Three: 'library technology as black box.' You see this all over the
scholarly literature about technology and learning: The role of
information management technologies in the research process is
taken for granted and not critically examined. It's just an
amorphous bunch of 'library tools' out there somehow.
Blackboxed
cc: bobarcpics - https://www.flickr.com/photos/75483412@N08
Blackbox

6. But in my 20 years of working in academic libraries, the picture
seems more complicated. There seems a more convincing way of
thinking about how people and library technologies are enmeshed.
A different way?
cc: weesen - https://www.flickr.com/photos/36317426@N00

7. So, very quickly: As many of you know, I'm currently working on a
PhD through Lancaster University in their department of E-Research
and Technology Enhanced Learning. I'm hoping to finish before my
kids hit puberty. This HUGE question of how people and
technologies are entangled is something that really fascinates me.
PhD: 2015-2018 (we hope)
cc: quinn.anya - https://www.flickr.com/photos/53326337@N00

8. For the first two years of the programme, I did five empirical
projects about how technology is implicated in various aspects of
library services. For my most recent study, I wanted to try to unpick
the process of searching and managing information, so as not to
privilege either the technologies or the people, but to show how
they're entangled and mutually constitutive. I was also keen to look
at contexts where students were working collaboratively.
Empirical studies
cc: katerha - https://www.flickr.com/photos/8489692@N03

9. • So, as a pilot study this past autumn, I interviewed 3 students in
the mainly online programme in sustainability leadership here at
Cambridge.
• The 3 students were part of a 6-person team assigned a 10-month
research project on a topic of their choosing. The 6 students all
live in different countries and together had to figure out the
scope of their topic, its salient literature, and then manage their
search results.
• I was really curious how the students accomplished this as a
group.
The pilot study
• 3 semi-structured interviews
• Globally dispersed post-graduate
students
• 10-month group project
cc: Defence Images - https://www.flickr.com/photos/48399297@N04

10. First: How the students used the technologies was very social.
Though they obviously didn't sit shoulder-to-shoulder doing
searches, there was fascinating collaborative dialogue after
retrieving their search results, meaning they worked together to
determine uniqueness and relevance.
Finding 1: Sociality
cc: Governo do Estado de São Paulo - https://www.flickr.com/photos/38014693@N04

11. Second: The shape of this dialogue stemmed from an interplay of
two things: A) Social roles – i.e., decisions about who did what in
their team – which was a complicated negotiation along many
relations of power. And also: The students' choice to use Slack, the
online project-management app, to manage and discuss their
search results, which was super interesting because it provided a
high-level of surveillance and scruitny of each others' work, which
in turn actively shaped the course of their learning and
collaboration.
Finding 2: Roles and Tech
cc: mbiebusch - https://www.flickr.com/photos/25854964@N05

12. Searching for and managing information is
socSo, I realise this is a very fast gallop, but a few major over-arching themes of the study are:
1) The whole process of managing information for this group was intensely social and fraught with power negotiations from dividing the labour of who searched what (and why) and the long
dialogues afterwards about relevance and worth.
2) And these social relations were inextricably bound up with technology choices and usage decisions. How the students chose to use Slack both reinforced their social divisions, through
forums for posting their findings, and, conversely, allowed for a huge degree of fluidity within their roles, precisely because of the high degree of surveillance and scrutiny Slack enabled.
• ial and contextual
• The social and technical are inextricably
bound together
Themes
cc: hanspoldoja - https://www.flickr.com/photos/83641890@N00

13. So, the two main points I want to make here are this: In just my
little study, I was able to see that technology use is a complicated
entanglement of social relations, power dynamics and how features
of technology are interpreted within a specific moment. The
technology was hardly neutral, nor was it a force to work against,
and it really mattered which tools were used and how.
Technology use is a
complex entanglement
cc: brewbooks - https://www.flickr.com/photos/93452909@N00

14. And: We need to be very careful when we use terms such as
'technology-enhanced learning,' Because what exactly is being
enhanced, and for whom? Who benefits from educational
technology, or not, and why? My little study showed that it's
impossible to prescribe one-sized fits all technology solutions. I
think this is something we always need to keep in mind as we
develop library services.
Inherent bias
in the term
'technology-
enhanced
learning'
cc: jessgrrrr - https://www.flickr.com/photos/26435424@N05

15. Thank you
@MegWestbury