Connaway, L. S. (2019). From research to reality: Transforming libraries for a global information world. Keynote presented at the IFLA Satellite Conference, August 30, 2019, Rome, Italy.

1. Rome | IFLA Satellite | 30 August 2019
From Research to Reality:
Transforming Libraries for a Global Information World
Lynn Silipigni Connaway, PhD
Director of Library Trends and User Research
OCLC
connawal@oclc.org
@LynnConnaway

2. “…number of internet users worldwide [is] in the region of 3.6
billion – around half the world’s population – while Facebook
has more than 2 billion active monthly users.”
(Constine 2019)
“33% of UK internet users did a ‘digital detox’ at some point in
2015”
(Hutt 2019)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/smemon/9558344658/ by Sean MacEntee / CC BY 2.0

3. “Millennials and the post-millennial generation are
more connected than any other age group, but the
rise of social media has coincided with increased
levels of depression, anxiety and loneliness among
young people.”
(Edmond 2017)
Image:https://www.flickr.com/photos/10616199@N00/5464399000/ by jo / CC BY-NY 2.0

4. “66% of people polled
worldwide said they could not
live without the Internet.”
(Hutt 2019)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/scif0r/24986058928/ by Denis Simonet/ CC BY 2.0

5. LIS RESEARCH METHODS

6. Methodology 1950 1960 1965 1970 1975 Total* %*
Theoretical-analytical 11 17 11 36 52 127 14
Information system design 7 16 21 57 49 150 17
Surveys on the public 3 2 9 20 19 53 3
Survey or experiment on libraries,
etc.
22 15 45 89 113 284 32
Bibliometric and similar studies 0 1 7 14 16 38 4
Content analysis 0 1 2 1 3 7 1
Secondary analysis 6 15 15 13 27 76 8
Historical methodologies 21 26 25 49 42 163 18
Descriptive bibliography 7 4 6 4 9 30 3
Comparative studies 0 2 6 4 7 19 2
Other and multiple 3 1 7 9 10 30 3
All papers* 76 96 139 274 315 900 100
Research Papers by Methodology &
(Powell, 1999)
Research Papers by Methodology & Year

7. Research Methods: JDoc 2001-2010
• N=367
• Theoretical approach, 38%
• Content analysis, 14%
• Questionnaire, 13.8%
• Experiment, 13.4%
• Interview, 13.4%
(Chu, 2015)
Image:https://www.flickr.com/photos/bramhall/32726231845/ by dvdbramhall/ CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

8. Research Methods:
JASIS&T 2001-2010
• N=554
• Experiment, 31%
• Bibliometrics, 23%
• Questionnaire, 14%
• Content analysis, 13%
• Theoretical approach, 12%
(Chu, 2015)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ooomz/38378720172/by Umesh Gopinath / CC BY 2.0

9. Research Methods:
LISR 2001-2010
• N=241
• Content analysis, 30%
• Questionnaire, 28%
• Interview, 20%
• Theoretical approach, 15%
• Experiment, 9%
(Chu, 2015)
Image :https://www.flickr.com/photos/scif0r/38827414252/ by Denis Simonet/ CC BY 2.0

10. Research Methods: JAL 2004-2013JAL
2004-2013Method Percentage (n=346)
Questionnaire 47.6
Test or Quiz 2.6
Diary 0.6
Content Analysis 27.2
Semi-structured Interviews 14.0
Analysis of existing statistics 6.6
Citation Analysis 6.3
Focus Group Interview 5.7
Observation 4.3
Log Analysis 3.4
Task Analysis 2.9
(Luo & McKinney, 2015)

11. Method Percentage (n=2460)
Bibliometrics 16.6
Other Methods 12.8
Theoretical Approach 10.3
Questionnaire 10.3
Content Analysis 8.0
Mixed Methodology 6.6
Webometrics 5.4
Big data, TDM 4.9
Interview 3.7
Experiment 2.6
Not mentioned 14.5
Research Methods by Popularity, 2010-2015
(Jasiewicz, J., 2018)

12. Methods Mentioned Less than 1%
• Historical method (1.0%)
• Observation (0.8%)
• Ethnography/field study (0.8%)
• Focus groups (0.6%)
• Transaction log analysis (0.3%)
• Delphi study (0.3%)
• Research diary/Journal (0.2%)
• Think aloud protocol (0.1%)
(Jasiewicz, J., 2018)n=2460
Image:https://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisahickey/8325425633/ by Chrisa Hickey/CC BY-NC 2.0

13. Research methods and techniques used in articles published in Library
& Information Science Research (N=202) and College & Research
Libraries (N=223) between 2010 and 2015.

14. Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/antyx/2712495733/ by Flasher T / CC BY-SA 2.0
“The LIS field is maturing in terms of research
method selection and application in that a greater
number and wider variety of research methods
are used in all the research publications this study
examines…Scholars are no longer limited to the
research methods traditionally applied in LIS
explorations…"
(Chu, 2015, 40)

15. MOST POPULAR RESEARCH
METHODS USED IN LIS?

16. Survey research is one of the
most popular methods used in
the LIS literature.
(Case & Given, 2016)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/smemon/9554125745/ by Sean MacEntee / CC BY 2.0

17. “Perhaps the most convenient method
of studying the consequences of this
law will be to follow the reader from the
moment he enters the library to the
moment he leaves it…”
(Ranganathan, 1931, 337)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mdsousa/6437401539/ by pushypenguin/ CC BBY 2.0

18. • Interviews, 51
• Surveys, 34
• Content Analysis, 28
(Greifeneder, 2014)
Information Behaviour Research Methods:
JASIST, Information Research 2012-2013
JDOC, iConference Proceedings 2013-2014
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/catchpenny/100353207/ Catchpenny/CC BY-ND 2.0

19. Information Behaviour Research Methods:
JASIST, Information Research 2012-2013
JDOC, iConference Proceedings 2013-2014
• Methods used less than five times:
• Delphi studies (Poirier &
Robinson, 2014)
• Eye-tracking (e.g. Balatsoukas &
Ruthven, 2012; Wildemuth, 2009)
• Log file analysis (Jiang, 2014)
• Participatory designs
(Greifeneder, 2014)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/centre_image_library/446084041/ by Ann Silver/CC BY-NC 2.0

20. • Mixed Methods, 45%
• More than two methods, 7%
• Qualitative-Qualitative, 69%
• Quantitative-Qualitative, 31%
• Quantitative-Quantitative, 0%
(Greifeneder, 2014)
Information Behaviour Research Methods:
JASIST, Information Research 2012-2013
JDOC, iConference Proceedings 2013-2014
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kjloggins/9669745423/ by Kerry Loggins / CC BY-ND 2.0

21. Qualitative and mixed-method studies are not
as prevalent in information behavior studies
but demonstrate a greater variety of research
strategies and data collection techniques.
(Matusiak, 2017; McKechnie et al., 2002)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/smemon/9556096685/ by Sean MacEntee/CC BY 2.0

22. Call for Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research
• Rich data and thick description
• Answer how and why questions
• Can support decision-making for resources and programs
• Strategic planning from a user perspective
• Can help motivate and increase buy-in for change
• Provides opportunity to build relationships
(Connaway & Radford, 2017; Asher & Miller, 2011)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lejournaldemaman/7140241453/ by Maman Voyage / CC BY-ND 2.0

23. Challenges: Research Environment
• Reduced funding opportunities
• Scholarly value
• Practical implications
• Weak relationships with other disciplines
• Limited communication of research and outputs
• Inconsistent quality
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/froderik/27440004244/ by Fredrik Rubensson/ CC BY-SA 2.0

24. WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM
MIXED METHODS RESEARCH?

25. Determining trustworthy sources
of information is difficult in
today’s environment.
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/28370466@N05/45075953324/ by mangopulp2008 / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

26. “…the whole kind of conversation around fake news
is this really important example of how important it
is in our daily life and civic health in order to bring
critical skills to bear on understanding information
and being able to critically evaluate the source of
that.”
(Advisory Member LM03, Research University, Secular, Private)

27. Millennials and Post-Millennials, although at
ease with information technology, struggle
with the evaluation of online sources.
(Connaway, Lanclos, & Hood, 2013;
Connaway, White, Lanclos, & Le Cornu, 2013;
Stanford History Education Group, 2016)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/an-di/8461632247/ Andreas N. / CC BY 2.0

28. “And YouTube videos, I've always watched
YouTube, so that's highly credible.”
(Researching Students’ Information Choices, E06, Male, Age 12, Elementary Student)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/esher27/5784362364/ by Elyse / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

29. “Well, for Wikipedia, my mom always said, ‘Don't listen to
Wikipedia because they're just personal opinions,’ so I
didn't really want to do that one.”
(Researching Students’ Information Choices, E26, Male, age 12, Elementary Student)
The Learning Black Market
& Wikipedia Shaming
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/smemon/9559496358/ by Sean MacEntee / CC BY 2.0

30. “…I always go to Wikipedia first,
because it seems like it's open-source
and people can kind of update it. As
the issue gets more in depth, they can
add sources to it.”
(Researching Students’ Information Choices, U02 ,
Male, Age 23, Physical Science)
Image:https://www.flickr.com/photos/kdirse/35867985230/ Kristijonas Dirse / CC BY 2.0

31. “Wikipedia… it’s perfect, because it gives
you the words, the things, the technical
words that you need to look, keywords, so
Wikipedia is always, always the first step.”
(UOCG1, Male, Age 35-44, Professions and Applied Sciences)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ooomz/35132120363/ by Umesh Gopinath / CC BY 2.0

32. “You spend many hours with Saint Google.
We entrust ourselves to Saint Google and
that solves it for us.”
(Digital Visitors & Residents, UOCFI6, Male, Age 53, Arts Humanities)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sjdunphy/5829438411/ by Dunphanizer / CC BY-SA 2.0

33. “At first I started looking online, and it was
a little bit overwhelming…I ended up
reaching into my mom’s cupboard and
using a recipe that I found in one of her old
cookbooks. The recipe was just what I was
looking for...”
(Digital Visitors and Residents,
USS3, Emerging, Female, Age 17,
High School Student)
“Convenient” Isn’t Always Simple
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/antyx/2713421634/ by Flasher T / CC BY-SA 2.0

34. WHY TEACH RESEARCH METHODS?

35. Core values for today's information schools
include: "organization of information;
universal access; collaboration; intellectual
freedom; self-directed learning and
stewardship"
(Moran; Marchionini, 2012, p. 98)
Image:https://www.flickr.com/photos/busytraveler_us/24128843487/ by Busy Traveler / CC BY-NC 2.0

36. “LIS graduates should not only be able to
critically read and evaluate research, but also to
design studies, conduct the research, collect and
analyze the data, and report research results,
which can be part of the curriculum objective for
critical thinking and analysis.”
(Connaway 2014)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/antyx/2714760583/ by Flasher T / CC BY-SA 2.0

37. Opportunity to collaborate with other educators to
incorporate critical literacy into the curriculum.
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/pamontgo/47732496192/ by Andy Montgomery / CC BY-SA 2.0

38. “I think information literacy is very important.
What information, is trustworthy? What
information is not? How do you delve into a
subject and really understand what the facts
are? How do you think about different
resources? I think that is going to be really
important for libraries. I think it is going be
something that is important for everybody,
from scientists to humanists.”
(Provost Interviewee PP06, Research
University, Secular, Public)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/scif0r/38858014061/ by Denis Simonet/CC BY 2.0

39. “By focusing on relationship building
instead of service excellence,
organizations can uncover new needs and
be in position to make a stronger impact.”
(Mathews 2012)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/12587661@N06/2307876191/ by Michael Gwyther-Jones / CC BY 2.0

40. The Boutique Library
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/fabulousfabs/7315600648/ by fabulousfabs / CC BY-NC 2.0
“A boutique library service model gives
us the ability to provide specialist,
personalized services not possible in an
anonymous, centralized system. It is
partnership in action.”
(Priestner, Tilley 2010)

41. “Borrowing is our premiere,
distinctive service. Nearly everyone
undertakes borrowing activities at
the library, much more frequently
than they do elsewhere.”
Digital Library Manager,
Worthington Ohio Public Libraries
What We Do Best
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/scif0r/27081868249/ by Denis Simonet / CC BY 2.0

42. Image: BookNetCanada, “Buyers, Borrowers, and Good News” accessed August 2nd 2019,
https://www.booknetcanada.ca/blog/2019/5/27/buyers-borrowers-and-good-news
N= 14,159

43. “A library is a growing organism.”
(Ranganathan 1931)
Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/pdenker/202816098/ by Patrick Denker / CC BY 2.0

44. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Erin Hood and Nick Spence for their
assistance in preparing this presentation.

45. References
Asher, Andrew. 2017. “On Ethnographic Research: How do Students Find the Information They Need?” In Research Methods for
Library and Information Science, 6th ed., edited by Lynn Silipigni Connaway and Marie L. Radford, 264. Westport, CT:
Libraries Unlimited.
Asher, A., & Miller, S. (2011). So you want to do anthropology in your library? Or a practical guide to ethnographic research in
academic libraries. Chicago: The ERIAL Project.
BookNetCanada, “Buyers, Borrowers, and Good News” accessed August 2nd 2019,
https://www.booknetcanada.ca/blog/2019/5/27/buyers- borrowers-and-good-news
Case, D. O., & Given, L. S. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behaviour.
Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Chu, H. (2015). Research Methods in Library and Information Science: A Content Analysis. Library & Information Science Research
37(1), 36-41.
Clement, J. "Number of Internet Users in Selected Countries 2019." Statista. May 2019. Accessed July 10, 2019.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/262966/number-of-internet-users-in-selected-countries/.
Connaway, L. S. "Why Libraries? A Call for Use-Centered Assessment." BiD: Textos Universitaris de Biblioteconomia i
Documentacio. 32 (2014) http://bid.ub.edu/en/32/connaway3.htm
Connaway, L. S. (2017, June 19). Putting the library in the life of the user: Listen, then lead, to promote a unique and compelling role
for academic libraries. Guest of Choice, Choice360 blog. Retrieved from http://www.choice360.org/blog/putting-the-
library-in-the-life-of-the-user

46. Connaway, L. S. (2017, August 25). Can you believe it? How to determine credibility in the era of fake news. Inside ASIS&T
President’s Column, August 2017.
Connaway, L. S., Lanclos, D. M., & Hood, E. M. (2013, December 6). “I always stick with the first thing that comes up on
Google…” Where people go for information, what they use, and why. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved from
http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/12/i-always-stick-with-the-first-thing-that-comes-up-on-google---where-people-
go-for-information-what-they-use-and-why
Connaway, L. S., & Radford, M. L. (2017). Research methods for library and information science (6th ed.). Westport, CT:
Libraries Unlimited.
Connaway, L. S., Seadle, M., Julien, H., & Kasprak, A. (2017). Digital literacy in the era of fake news: Key roles for information
professionals. ASIS&T President’s Invited Panel.
Connaway, L. S., White, D., Lanclos, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2013). Visitors and Residents: What motivates engagement with the
digital information environment? Information Research, 18(1). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/18-
1/infres181.html’
Constine, Josh. "Facebook Now Has 2 Billion Monthly Users... and Responsibility." TechCrunch. June 27, 2017. Accessed July
10, 2019. https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/27/facebook-2-billion-users/.
Edmond, Charlotte. “Could you live without the internet? People in these countries say they can’t imagine it.” World Economic
Forum. September 5, 2017. Accessed August 2 2019.
References

47. Greifeneder, E. (2014). Trends in information behaviour research. In Proceedings of ISIC, the Information Behaviour Conference,
Leeds, 2-5 September, 2014: Part 1. http://InformationR.net/ir/19-4/isic/isic13.html
Hutt, Rosamond. "A Third of UK Internet Users Have Taken a Digital Detox – Do You Need One?" World Economic Forum.
August 4, 2014. Accessed July 10, 2019. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/08/a-third-of-uk-internet-users-have-
taken-a-digital-detox-do-you-need-one/.
Jasiewicz, J. (2018). Stosowanie sondaży i wywiadów w obszarze library and information science. Folia Toruniensia, 18, 151-170.
Jasiewicz, J. "Social sience research methods in library science between 2010 and 2015 A bibliometric analysis." (2018): 9.
Luo, L., & McKinney, M. (2015). JAL in the Past Decade: A Comprehensive Analysis of Academic Library Research. The Journal of
Academic Librarianship 41(2),123-129.
Mathews, B. (2012). Think like a startup: A white paper to inspire library entrepreneurialism.
http://chronicle.com/blognetwork/theubiquitouslibrarian/2012/04/04/think-like-a-startup-a-white-paper/.
Matusiak, K. K. (2017). Studying information behavior of image users: An overview of research methodology in LIS literature,
2004-2015. Library and Information Science Research 39 (1), 53–60.
McKechnie, L. M., Baker, L., Greenwood, M., & Julien, H. (2002). Research method trends in human information behaviour
literature. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research: Studies of Information Seeking in Context (Proceedings
of ISIC 2002), 3, 113-125.
Moran, Barbara; Marchionini, Gary (2012). "Information professionals 2050: educating the next generation of information
professionals". Information Services & Use, vol. 32, n.º 3/4, p. 95–100.
References

48. Powell, R. (1999). Recent Trends in Research: A Methodological Essay. Library & Information Science Research 21(1), 91-119.
Priestner, A., Tilley, E. "Boutique Libraries at Your Service." Library & Information Update July (2010)
Ranganathan, S. R. 1931. The Five Laws of Library Science. London: Edward Goldston, Ltd.
Reuter, Kara. “The Library in the Community.” Worthington Ohio Public Libraries, 17 July 2019
Stanford History Education Group. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Retrieved from
https://sheg.stanford.edu/upload/V3LessonPlans/Executive Summary 11.21.16.pdf
Steiner, P. (1993, July 5) On the internet. [Cartoon] The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://condenaststore.com/featured/on-
the-internet-peter-steiner.html
References

49. Questions &
Discussion
Lynn Silipigni Connaway, PhD
Director of Library Trends and User
Research OCLC
connawal@oclc.org
@LynnConnaway