Climate Change Adaptation
Planning in Boston
Ellen M. Douglas, PE, PhD
Associate Professor, School for the Environment
University of Massachusetts Boston
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC AR5, 9/27/13) finds that:
• it is “unequivocal” that Earth’s climate is
warming.
• Since the 1950’s, it is “extremely likely” that
human emission have been the dominant
cause of the rise in global temperature.
Source: IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis—Summary for Policymakers.
Climate change is happening and
humans are the predominant cause.
http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/observed-global-fossil-fuel-co2
Things don’t seem to be getting better
• Global temperatures are likely to rise 0.5-8.6 F by
the end of the century depending carbon
emissions.
• Most aspects of climate change will continue for
many centuries even if CO2 emissions stop.
• The ocean will continue to warm. Heat will
penetrate from the surface to the deep ocean and
affect ocean circulation.
• Thermal expansion has dominated SLR in 20th C, but
ice-sheet melt will likely dominate later in 21st C.
Climate change is happening and
humans are the dominant cause.
20th century contributors to GMSL rise
IPCC AR5 2013
Thermal expansion of ocean water and glacier melt has been
the biggest contributor to GMSL.
0.9 ± 0.4 mm/yr
Antarctica: 0.3 ± 0.1
mm/yr
Greenland: 0.3 ± 0.1
mm/yr
1.1 ± 0.3
mm/yr
0.4 ± 0.1
mm/yr
Impoundment & groundwater
Potential 21st century contributors
to GMSL rise
IPCC AR5 2013
Ice sheet melt and the ice-sheet “finger print is potentially
the biggest contributor in 21st C.
0.6 m
~60 m
Greenland: 7m
West Antarctic Ice Sheet: 5m
East Antarctic Ice Sheet: 52m
Sea-level rise in New England is not (and
will not) be the same as GMSL rise
 Mass redistribution (elastic gravitational
and rotational effects)
ICE SHEET
“FINGERPRINT’
A
DC
B
Figure 1-1. Fingerprints of spatially variable sea-level rise arising from melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet (A),
the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (B), the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (C) and alpine glaciers and ice caps (D). The
location of Boston is shown with a star. Shading represents the meters (arbitrary units) of sea-level rise that
would occur if each of these land-based ice reservoirs were to contribute a meter of equivalent GMSL rise.
(DeConto et al., 2016: Chapter 1 in BRAG report)
Climate Change in the
U.S. Northeast
New findings of the
Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment
Boston: The Future 100-Year Flood under
the Higher-Emissions Scenario
Boston: The Future 100-Year Flood under
the Higher-Emissions Scenario
Source: NECIA/UCS, 2007 (see: www.climatechoices.org/ne/)
The things that came out of NECIA
Scared the HELL out of everybody in
Boston with the flood maps, then…
Track 2:
Investigate
infrastructure
vulnerability
(MassDOT,
BWSC, Massport
Track 1:
Investigate
social and
institutional
vulnerability
(TBHA, East
Boston)
Track 1…
Coastal Flooding and
Environmental Justice:
Identifying Vulnerable Communities
and Feasible Adaptation Strategies
for the Boston Metro Area
Ellen Douglas1, Paul Kirshen2, Chris Watson1,
Jack Wiggin1, Michael Paolisso3, Ashley Enrici3
1University of Massachusetts, Boston
2Battelle
3University of Maryland, College Park
Human Aspects
Environment and
Impacts
Multi-Dimensional Scaling
Large-scale Solutions?
Multi-Dimensional Scaling
Large-scale Problems?
East Boston Adaptation
 Protection: “hard”(sea walls) or “soft”
(beach/dune) measures
 combination of the two most likely. Lots of
constraints (ie., DPA, densely urbanized).
 Accommodation: “floodproofing” of
homes and buildings
 residents can’t afford this on their own; many
are residents are rentors, not property owners.
 Temporary evacuation:
 Current plan inadequate, facilities flooded,
tunnel access, no place to go.
 Retreat:
 Absolutely not an option for East Bostonians
Coinciding Stakeholder Perspectives
Common
Ground
Resident City
Perceptions of
climate change
Adoption of scientific definition
varies broadly
Explicit adoption of
Scientific Model
Impact of recent
disasters
Sandy and Boston marathon
bombing alerted and raised
desire to learn and be better
prepared for a disaster
Sandy and Boston
marathon bombing
alerted need for
emergency readiness and
state-wide coordination
Values for built
environment
Transportation access to
schools, jobs, emergency care
facilities
Preserve Infrastructure
and operational
capabilities
Emergency
preparedness
Emergency preparedness:
location of safe evacuation
routes, access to food, medical
aid and shelter
Evacuation and
contigency planning
priorities for identified
sensitive areas
Priorities
Homes, buildings with distinct
community service functions, access
routes to jobs, emergency care
Minimize disaster
recovery costs and
damage to critical assets
Common interests
Information sharing, creating
emergency preparedness information
packet
Data sharing and resource
pooling among agencies for
improved coordination
23
Climate Change Adaptation in East
Boston; Workshop I,
Understanding the Issues
Paul Kirshen, NOAH and others
May 13, 2014
Objective: Exchange of the values and points
of view of neighborhood and agency
stakeholders in creating an East Boston that is
resilient to the present and future impacts of
sea level rise, coastal storms, and extreme
precipitation.
Neighborhood Delegate Groups:
• Orient Heights/Star of the Sea
• Eagle Hill and Central Square
• Maverick Landing and Jeffries Point
Implementation Agency Groups:
24
What is Important to Protect?
25
Climate Change Adaptation in East
Boston; Workshop 2,
Managing Present and Future
Coastal Flooding Risks
June 25, 2014
Objective: Study team present draft plan to
help East Boston adapt to the impacts that
reflect the values expressed at the workshop
100-year Water Level Threat Today -
Water Surface Elevation of 9.8 feet
NAVD88
Regional Solution for 2100
1N, 4N, 4S
27
Flood Wall
Temporary
Road Barrier
Landscaped berm
Innovative Barriers
28
Approximate Locations of Areas
Not Protected by Walls up to
2065 – 2085 (13 ft NAVD)
Building Floodproofing
30
31
32
ClimateCARE
2016- 2018
MA Coasal Zone Management Grant to
City of Boston for Detailed Design of
Flood Protection at East Boston
Greenway
33
Urban planning and resiliency
www.umb.edu/planning
Track 2…
MassDOT-FHWA Pilot Project:
Climate Change and Extreme
Weather
Vulnerability Assessment and
Adaptation Options for the
Central Artery/Tunnel System
Boston, Massachusetts
MHHW
+ 5 ft.
MHHW
+ 7.5 ft.
| Leading the Nation in
Transportation Excellence |
www.mass.gov/massdot 38
Tip O’Neill Tunnel Exit & Entrance Ramps
| Leading the Nation in
Transportation Excellence |
www.mass.gov/massdot 39
Vent Building 1
| Leading the Nation in
Transportation Excellence |
www.mass.gov/massdot 40
Vent Building 1 – Detail of Air Exchange Vent
 Ellen Douglas, UMass Boston
Project Manager, Climate Change, Hydrology
 Steven Miller, MassDOT
Project Manager
 Kirk Bosma, Woods Hole Group
Hydrodynamic Modelling, Engineering
 Paul Kirshen, UNH/UMass Boston
Climate Change, Vulnerability, Adaptation
 Chris Watson, UMass Boston
Assistant Project Manager, GIS, Database, Survey
 Katherin McArthur, MassDOT
Assistant Project Manager
Project Team
Why existing maps are not good enough
Storm Climatology
Tropical Storms
 Data set provided by
WindRiskTech (Emanuel, et
al., 2006)
 Select storms used to
develop a surface response
function
 Increased storm intensities
for 21st century based on
climate models
Extra-Tropical Storms
 Data set developed by
examining Boston tidal
residual water levels
 Re-analysis data used to
feed a balanced wind model
• A Large Statistically
robust set of
storms.
• No need to
determine joint
probabilities.
Causes of flooding
Hydrodynamic modeling
Flood exceedance probabilities
Flood exceedance probabilities
1% Flood depths
The good news:
 Extent of flooding under current conditions is fairly
limited with low exceedance probabilities. This allows
MassDOT to focus their efforts on reducing the
vulnerability of individual Structures and on local
adaptation strategies.
 Regional adaptation can prevent flooding in some areas
The bad news:
 Vulnerable Structures under current conditions include
some Tunnel Portals; the number of vulnerable Portals
triples by 2070.
The plan:
 Currently field verifying results and recommendations.
 Developing strategies for prioritizing and implementing
adaptation approaches over short and long term.
Good News and Bad News
Ellen Douglas, PE, PhD
Paul Kirshen, PhD
Rebecca Herst, PhD
Avery Palardy
Robyn Hannigan, PhD, Dean
School for the Environment, UMass Boston
CLIMATE READY
BOSTON
Results from Boston
Research Advisory
Group (BRAG)
climateready.boston.gov
Sea Level
Rise
Coastal Storms Extreme
Precipitation
Extreme
Temperatures
CLIMATE RISK FACTORS
climateready.boston.gov
climateready.boston.gov
climateready.boston.gov
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
Best available
science (models)
by hazard
Emissions
scenarios
Climate
projections
Vulnerability
assessment
RCP 2.6, 4.5, 8.5
SRES B1, A1Fi
climateready.boston.gov
The hard part is yet to be done
 Funding
 Planning
 Design
 Regional buy-in and collaboration
 Public/private partnerships
 Political will
 Public support
This is where you all come in!
QUESTIONS?

Ellen douglas mas 2017

  • 1.
    Climate Change Adaptation Planningin Boston Ellen M. Douglas, PE, PhD Associate Professor, School for the Environment University of Massachusetts Boston
  • 2.
    The Intergovernmental Panelon Climate Change (IPCC AR5, 9/27/13) finds that: • it is “unequivocal” that Earth’s climate is warming. • Since the 1950’s, it is “extremely likely” that human emission have been the dominant cause of the rise in global temperature. Source: IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis—Summary for Policymakers. Climate change is happening and humans are the predominant cause.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    • Global temperaturesare likely to rise 0.5-8.6 F by the end of the century depending carbon emissions. • Most aspects of climate change will continue for many centuries even if CO2 emissions stop. • The ocean will continue to warm. Heat will penetrate from the surface to the deep ocean and affect ocean circulation. • Thermal expansion has dominated SLR in 20th C, but ice-sheet melt will likely dominate later in 21st C. Climate change is happening and humans are the dominant cause.
  • 5.
    20th century contributorsto GMSL rise IPCC AR5 2013 Thermal expansion of ocean water and glacier melt has been the biggest contributor to GMSL. 0.9 ± 0.4 mm/yr Antarctica: 0.3 ± 0.1 mm/yr Greenland: 0.3 ± 0.1 mm/yr 1.1 ± 0.3 mm/yr 0.4 ± 0.1 mm/yr Impoundment & groundwater
  • 6.
    Potential 21st centurycontributors to GMSL rise IPCC AR5 2013 Ice sheet melt and the ice-sheet “finger print is potentially the biggest contributor in 21st C. 0.6 m ~60 m Greenland: 7m West Antarctic Ice Sheet: 5m East Antarctic Ice Sheet: 52m
  • 7.
    Sea-level rise inNew England is not (and will not) be the same as GMSL rise  Mass redistribution (elastic gravitational and rotational effects)
  • 8.
    ICE SHEET “FINGERPRINT’ A DC B Figure 1-1.Fingerprints of spatially variable sea-level rise arising from melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet (A), the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (B), the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (C) and alpine glaciers and ice caps (D). The location of Boston is shown with a star. Shading represents the meters (arbitrary units) of sea-level rise that would occur if each of these land-based ice reservoirs were to contribute a meter of equivalent GMSL rise. (DeConto et al., 2016: Chapter 1 in BRAG report)
  • 9.
    Climate Change inthe U.S. Northeast New findings of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment
  • 10.
    Boston: The Future100-Year Flood under the Higher-Emissions Scenario
  • 11.
    Boston: The Future100-Year Flood under the Higher-Emissions Scenario Source: NECIA/UCS, 2007 (see: www.climatechoices.org/ne/)
  • 12.
    The things thatcame out of NECIA Scared the HELL out of everybody in Boston with the flood maps, then… Track 2: Investigate infrastructure vulnerability (MassDOT, BWSC, Massport Track 1: Investigate social and institutional vulnerability (TBHA, East Boston)
  • 13.
    Track 1… Coastal Floodingand Environmental Justice: Identifying Vulnerable Communities and Feasible Adaptation Strategies for the Boston Metro Area Ellen Douglas1, Paul Kirshen2, Chris Watson1, Jack Wiggin1, Michael Paolisso3, Ashley Enrici3 1University of Massachusetts, Boston 2Battelle 3University of Maryland, College Park
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
    East Boston Adaptation Protection: “hard”(sea walls) or “soft” (beach/dune) measures  combination of the two most likely. Lots of constraints (ie., DPA, densely urbanized).  Accommodation: “floodproofing” of homes and buildings  residents can’t afford this on their own; many are residents are rentors, not property owners.  Temporary evacuation:  Current plan inadequate, facilities flooded, tunnel access, no place to go.  Retreat:  Absolutely not an option for East Bostonians
  • 22.
    Coinciding Stakeholder Perspectives Common Ground ResidentCity Perceptions of climate change Adoption of scientific definition varies broadly Explicit adoption of Scientific Model Impact of recent disasters Sandy and Boston marathon bombing alerted and raised desire to learn and be better prepared for a disaster Sandy and Boston marathon bombing alerted need for emergency readiness and state-wide coordination Values for built environment Transportation access to schools, jobs, emergency care facilities Preserve Infrastructure and operational capabilities Emergency preparedness Emergency preparedness: location of safe evacuation routes, access to food, medical aid and shelter Evacuation and contigency planning priorities for identified sensitive areas Priorities Homes, buildings with distinct community service functions, access routes to jobs, emergency care Minimize disaster recovery costs and damage to critical assets Common interests Information sharing, creating emergency preparedness information packet Data sharing and resource pooling among agencies for improved coordination
  • 23.
    23 Climate Change Adaptationin East Boston; Workshop I, Understanding the Issues Paul Kirshen, NOAH and others May 13, 2014 Objective: Exchange of the values and points of view of neighborhood and agency stakeholders in creating an East Boston that is resilient to the present and future impacts of sea level rise, coastal storms, and extreme precipitation.
  • 24.
    Neighborhood Delegate Groups: •Orient Heights/Star of the Sea • Eagle Hill and Central Square • Maverick Landing and Jeffries Point Implementation Agency Groups: 24 What is Important to Protect?
  • 25.
    25 Climate Change Adaptationin East Boston; Workshop 2, Managing Present and Future Coastal Flooding Risks June 25, 2014 Objective: Study team present draft plan to help East Boston adapt to the impacts that reflect the values expressed at the workshop
  • 26.
    100-year Water LevelThreat Today - Water Surface Elevation of 9.8 feet NAVD88
  • 27.
    Regional Solution for2100 1N, 4N, 4S 27 Flood Wall Temporary Road Barrier Landscaped berm
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Approximate Locations ofAreas Not Protected by Walls up to 2065 – 2085 (13 ft NAVD)
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    MA Coasal ZoneManagement Grant to City of Boston for Detailed Design of Flood Protection at East Boston Greenway 33
  • 34.
    Urban planning andresiliency www.umb.edu/planning
  • 35.
    Track 2… MassDOT-FHWA PilotProject: Climate Change and Extreme Weather Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Options for the Central Artery/Tunnel System Boston, Massachusetts
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
    | Leading theNation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 38 Tip O’Neill Tunnel Exit & Entrance Ramps
  • 39.
    | Leading theNation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 39 Vent Building 1
  • 40.
    | Leading theNation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 40 Vent Building 1 – Detail of Air Exchange Vent
  • 41.
     Ellen Douglas,UMass Boston Project Manager, Climate Change, Hydrology  Steven Miller, MassDOT Project Manager  Kirk Bosma, Woods Hole Group Hydrodynamic Modelling, Engineering  Paul Kirshen, UNH/UMass Boston Climate Change, Vulnerability, Adaptation  Chris Watson, UMass Boston Assistant Project Manager, GIS, Database, Survey  Katherin McArthur, MassDOT Assistant Project Manager Project Team
  • 42.
    Why existing mapsare not good enough
  • 43.
    Storm Climatology Tropical Storms Data set provided by WindRiskTech (Emanuel, et al., 2006)  Select storms used to develop a surface response function  Increased storm intensities for 21st century based on climate models Extra-Tropical Storms  Data set developed by examining Boston tidal residual water levels  Re-analysis data used to feed a balanced wind model • A Large Statistically robust set of storms. • No need to determine joint probabilities. Causes of flooding
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
    The good news: Extent of flooding under current conditions is fairly limited with low exceedance probabilities. This allows MassDOT to focus their efforts on reducing the vulnerability of individual Structures and on local adaptation strategies.  Regional adaptation can prevent flooding in some areas The bad news:  Vulnerable Structures under current conditions include some Tunnel Portals; the number of vulnerable Portals triples by 2070. The plan:  Currently field verifying results and recommendations.  Developing strategies for prioritizing and implementing adaptation approaches over short and long term. Good News and Bad News
  • 49.
    Ellen Douglas, PE,PhD Paul Kirshen, PhD Rebecca Herst, PhD Avery Palardy Robyn Hannigan, PhD, Dean School for the Environment, UMass Boston CLIMATE READY BOSTON Results from Boston Research Advisory Group (BRAG) climateready.boston.gov
  • 50.
    Sea Level Rise Coastal StormsExtreme Precipitation Extreme Temperatures CLIMATE RISK FACTORS climateready.boston.gov
  • 51.
  • 52.
  • 53.
    VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Best available science(models) by hazard Emissions scenarios Climate projections Vulnerability assessment RCP 2.6, 4.5, 8.5 SRES B1, A1Fi climateready.boston.gov
  • 54.
    The hard partis yet to be done  Funding  Planning  Design  Regional buy-in and collaboration  Public/private partnerships  Political will  Public support This is where you all come in!
  • 55.