For my capstone project I wanted to analyze successful childhood interventions that build non-cognitive skills. First, I identified traits that increased the likelihood of positive outcomes. Then, I pinpointed interventions that improved those traits. I drew from over fifty studies and included only those that met stringent selection standards such as experimental study design, repeat studies among different populations and significant effect sizes. Based on my findings, I advocated increased emphasis on specific interventions in schools and communities.
2. Background
Resilience = Protective Factors > Risk
Factors
At-risk children are in situations that
increase their likelihood of negative
outcomes (Werner & Smith, 2001)
Children from birth to age 7
3. Significance
Earlier is Better
Risk factors accumulate
Most significant protective factors exist before
age 10
Longitudinal study from birth to age 40
Ratings of mother’s caregiving skills during
infancy
Toddler’s social orientation score
Emotional support available (ages 2 and 10)
4. Outline
1. Identify Protective Factors
Social Maturity
Emotional Support
Personal Drive
2. Discuss Programs & Techniques
3. Gaps and Recommendations
5. Social Maturity
Description
Regulate emotion and behavior
Constructively solves problems
Impact
Do better academically (Schelble, Franks, & Miller, 2010).
Have positive peer relationships (Bulotsky-Shearer, Fantuzzo, & McDermott,
2010).
Experience fewer medical problems, are less likely to
have a criminal record, or display violent behavior in
adulthood (Obradović, Burt, & Masten, 2010)
6. Emotional Support
Description
Quality parent-child interactions
Positive relationships with adults outside the
immediate family.
Impact
Teaches emotional regulation (Sanson, Smart, & Misson, 2011)
Improves academic and interpersonal
adjustment(Baker & Hoerger, 2012)
Long-term impact on later development of
emotional support systems (Werner & Smith, 2001)
7. Personal Drive
Description
Self-efficacy
Motivation to learn
Stimulating home environment
Impact
Improved academic competence
Long-term impact on work satisfaction(Werner & Smith, 2001)
8. Intervention & Prevention
Home Visitation
Improved health
Increased positive
mother-child
interactions
Reduced chance of
maltreatment or
witnessing DV
School-Based
P.A.T.H.S, Incredible
Years, Tools of Mind
Social skills
Consideration
Positive parent-
child interactions
Academic
engagement
10. Implementation
Community-Family Link (Jones et al. 2011; DuBois, Portillo, Rhodes, Silverthorn, &
Valentine, 2011)
Parent education
Community support
Universal Integration
School-wide programs have longer-lasting impacts
Allows community to personalize (Dishion, 2011)
Quality
Teacher training
Childcare vs. Preschool
11. Supported Protective Factors
Social Maturity
Home Visitation
PATHS
Incredible Years
Tools of Mind
Play
Good Behavior Game
Emotional Support
Home Visitation
Incredible Years
Play
Personal Drive
Praise
12. Gaps & Recommendations
Little rigorously tested information on how to build
self-efficacy or a motivation to learn
Many of the implementation factors mentioned are
not consistently used
Editor's Notes
What skills protect kids?How do we teach those skills?
At-risk:More likely to have negative outcomes Psychological problemsCriminal record, prison, etc. Health problems (drug use, death)Low-educational/economic attainment Risk factors Low-income Abuse (maltreatment, neglect, DV) Cumulative Risk Model“Snowball effect”In their study, children with two or three risk factors (maltreatment, family on food stamps, mother’s psychological distress) were 19 times more likely to display externalizing distress compared to children with zero risk factors (Gabalda, Thompson, & Kaslow, 2010, p. 434).Protective PathwaysWerner and Smith (2001) identified protective factors that had a significant impact on quality of adaptation at age 40 Quality of intimate relationshipsAdaptation to problemsPsychological wellbeingAttitude towards workFor high-risk men protective factors included 1) ratings of mother’s caregiving skills during infancy, 2) toddler’s social orientation score and physical status at age 2, and 3) ratings of the emotional support available to the child between ages 2 and 10; For high-risk women protective factors included 1) score on cognitive development and social maturity at age 2, 2) ratings of social orientation and mother’s positive interactions with her daughter, and 3) ratings of emotional support and educational stimulation provided for the child in the home between ages 2 and 10 (p. 159). Protective factors during early life can alter the lives of at-risk children well into adulthood.
Children at risk are going to experience stressful life events no matter what happens, protective factors decrease the likelihood that such events will result in long-term negative impacts/outcomes Cumulative Risk ModelIn their study, children with two or three risk factors (maltreatment, family on food stamps, mother’s psychological distress) were 19 times more likely to display externalizing distress compared to children with zero risk factors (Gabalda, Thompson, & Kaslow, 2010, p. 434).Protective PathwaysWerner and Smith (2001) identified protective factors that had a significant impact on quality of adaptation at age 40 Quality of intimate relationshipsAdaptation to problemsPsychological wellbeingAttitude towards workFor high-risk men protective factors included 1) ratings of mother’s caregiving skills during infancy, 2) toddler’s social orientation score and physical status at age 2, and 3) ratings of the emotional support available to the child between ages 2 and 10; For high-risk women protective factors included 1) score on cognitive development and social maturity at age 2, 2) ratings of social orientation and mother’s positive interactions with her daughter, and 3) ratings of emotional support and educational stimulation provided for the child in the home between ages 2 and 10 (p. 159). Protective factors during early life can alter the lives of at-risk children well into adulthood.
Protective factors hold a great deal of potential for the development of effective early childhood interventions. This paper uses an evidence-based framework to evaluate the most effective early childhood interventions by 1) identifying protective factors for at-risk children and 2) discussing programs and techniques shown to promote those protective factors.Wide array of protective factors that overlap or are essentially identical ideas but different terms were used/means of evaluatingThematic groupsSocial maturityEmotional supportPersonal drive
Delinquency, aggression, and drug use in adolescence (Brook, Brook, Rubenstone, Zhang, & Saar, 2011; Temcheff, et al., 2011)Medical problems, educational attainment, criminal activity, and violent behavior in adulthood (Obradović, Burt, & Masten, 2010)“recognize andmanage emotions, develop caring and concern for others,make responsible decisions, build positive relationships and handle challenging situations constructively” (Kramer, Caldarella, Christensen, & Shatzer, 2010, p. 304). Children who cannot regulate their emotions often respond to difficult activities with anger and physical outburst; this “inappropriate” behavior impairs their ability to learn in a classroom setting (Gerstein, et al.). Behavioral problems can be reduced through behavioral regulation and the development of problem solving skills. The ability to tackle difficult social and cognitive problems without giving up or getting anger promotes likeability among peers and increases cognitive development (Gerstein, et al., 2011; Graziano, Reavis, Keane, & Calkins, 2007). Children with social-emotional competence reap many protective benefits including positive attention from caregivers, positive social relationships, and a foundation for academic success (McCabe & Altamura, 2011).
This protective theme is dependent on the family and community rather than the child and includes quality parent-child interactions and positive relationships with adults outside the immediate family.Quality parent-child interactions are characterized by high responsiveness, consistency, and warmth (Baker & Hoerger, 2012; Biringen, et al., 2012; Sanson, Smart, & Misson, 2011).Positive relationships outside of the home provide additional support networks for children (DuBois, Portillo, Rhodes, Silverthorn, & Valentine, 2011; Li, Godinet, & Arnsberger, 2011; McCoy & Raver, 2011). Moreover, low-income mothers with high levels of family support are less likely to be reported for child maltreatment (Li, et al., 2011).For high-risk males protective factors included 1) ratings of mother’s caregiving skills during infancy, 2) toddler’s social orientation score and physical status at age 2, and 3) ratings of the emotional support available to the child between ages 2 and 10; For high-risk women protective factors included 1) score on cognitive development and social maturity at age 2, 2) ratings of social orientation and mother’s positive interactions with her daughter, and 3) ratings of emotional support and educational stimulation provided for the child in the home between ages 2 and 10 (p. 159). (Werner & Smith, 2001)
Nurse visits at-risk mothers Pre- & Post-pregnancyProvide support and education for the motherSpecific curriculumTrained staff implement programs
Jones et al. (2011) School Wide intervention had impact 2 years laterFriends for Life (2007) Universal programs are the most supportive of healthy long-term patterns and don't single out kids with issues alreadyKIDS tracking system Rouse Fantuzzo 2008