FINAL YEAR DIPLOMA PROJECT (ESTIMATION, PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING)PROJECT.pptx

PROJECT
PRESENTATION
ON
PROPOSED SCHOOL
BUILDING
(LOWER PRIMARY)
BY GROUP 6
1
GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE MEENANGADI
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
GUIDED BY - NITHIN V SABU

PROJECT
ASSOCIATES:-
• ANJANA SIJI
• ANSINA C H
• ARUNIMA MOHANDAS
• ASWANTH MOHANAN
• JESLIN T J
• THAMEEM RASI
2

CONTENTS
3
• Introduction
• Objective
• Methodology
• Work plan
• Details from KPBR
• Site details
• Site plan
• Service plan
• Survey report
• Area calculation
• Plan, section and
elevation(Drawings)
• Beam column assembly
• Design of structures:
• Abstract estimate
• Conclusion
• Reference

INTRODUCTION
4
 ALL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE DESIGNED TO SUSTAIN
STRUCTURAL SAFETY.
 THE DESIGN OF REINFORCED STRUCTURE IS MAINLY BASED
ON THE LIMIT STATE METHOD.
 THE OBJECT OF THE PROJECT IS TO GET A PRACTICAL
KNOWLEDGE IN DESIGN, DRAWING AND IN PREPARATION OF
DETAILED ESTIMATE

OBJECTIVE
5
• Draft the Layout of the
proposed building using
AutoCAD
• Design the building based on
limit state design
• Detailed estimate
• Calculate the approximate
cost of the building.

METHODOLOGY
6
•STUDY OF
IS 456 :2000,
SP 16 , SP
34,IS 13920
•FOR
DETAILING
DIAGRAM
• FOR
DESIGNING
MANUALLY
•USING
AUTO CAD
•PREPARATI
ON OF
BUILDING
LAYOUT
•FOR
DETAILING
DIAGRAM
•MICROSOFT
EXCEL
•DETAILED
ESTIMATION
BY
CENTERLINE
METHOD
•ABSTRACT
ESTIMATE

WORK PLAN
SURVEY
DATA
COLLECTION
PREPARATION
OF DRAWING
STRUCTURAL
DESIGN
DETAILED
ESTIMATE
ABSTRACT
ESTIMATE
7
FIG: 1

DATA FROM KPBR
GROUP B EDUCATIONAL BUILDING
YARDS
• (EDUCATIONAL BUILDING AREA>500𝑚2
• FRONT = 7.5𝑚
• REAR = 3𝑚
• SIDE = 3𝑚
HEIGHT OF ROOM – MINIMUM 3𝒎
VERANDHA – WIDTH NOT LESS THAN 1𝒎
STAIRCASE;
MINIMUM WIDTH 120𝒄𝒎
MINIMUM TREAD 30𝒄𝒎
MAXIMUM RISE 15𝒄𝒎
8

TYPE OF BUILDING SECTION
MAX
COVERAG
E
MAX F S I
EDUCATIONAL
UP TO H S 35 2.5
OTHERS 50 2.5
PERMISSIBLE COVERAGE AND F S I
9
TABLE: 1

AREA CALCULATION
10
FIG: 2

AREA CALCULATION
• 1.AREA OF THE
TRIANGLE (1) =1184.929
m2
• 2.AREA OF THE
TRIANGLE (2) = 343.6452
m2
• 3. AREA OF THE
TRIANGLE (3) =898.6652
m2
• 4. AREA OF THE
TRIANGLE (4) =129.7229
m2
• TOTALAREA=1184.929+34
3.6452+898.6652+129.7229
= 2556.9631m2
= 2556.9631/40.47
= 63.18cent
= 0.25568 hectare
• AREA, A=2556.9631 m2 =
0.25568 hectare
= 63.18 cent
11

SITE DETAILS
Plot near polytechnic college Meenangadi
• The site for proposed school building at
Meenangadi near Govt. polytechnic college.
• The site situated in Meenangadi
panchayath.
400 Away from state highway (Meenangadi –
Panamaram)
• The site is planned for an area
2556.9631m2.
• The site was measured using chain(tape)
12
FIG: 3

SITE PLAN OF PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING PLOT NEAR COLLEGE
13
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FIG: 4

14
SERVICE PLAN
FIG: 5

SURVEY REPORT
PLOT AREA 2556.9631m2
BUILD UP AREA 828.7375m2
COVERAGE 20%
FSI 0.25
15
FIG: 6

PLAN(GROUND FLOOR)
16
FIG: 7

PLAN (FIRST FLOOR)
17
FIG: 8

SECTION
18
FIG: 9

(ELEVATION)
19
FIG: 10

20
BEAM COLUMN ASSEMBLY
FIG: 11

21
COVERAGE
COVERAGE =
𝐶𝑂𝑉𝐸𝑅𝐸𝐷 𝐴𝑅𝐸𝐴
𝑃𝐿𝑂𝑇 𝐴𝑅𝐸𝐴
× 100
=
511
2556.9631
× 100 = 20%
FLOOR AREA INDEX
FSI =
𝑇𝑂𝑇𝐴𝐿 𝐹𝐿𝑂𝑂𝑅 𝐴𝑅𝐸𝐴
𝑃𝐿𝑂𝑇 𝐴𝑅𝐸𝐴
=
630.24
2556.9631
= 0.25
MAIN DETAILS

22
• LY = 6400 MM
• LX = 3075 MM
• LIVE LOAD = 3 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
• SURFACE
FINISH = 1 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
• D = 96MM D = 131MM
• FACTORED LOAD
=11𝑘𝑁
• PROVIDE 10 MM Ø
BARS @ 240 MM
C/C(MAIN)
• PROVIDE 8 MM Ø
BARS @ 200 MM
C/C(DIST)
DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (ONE WAY SLAB)
FIG: 12

•
𝐿𝑌
𝐿𝑋
> 2 THEN IT IS A ONE
WAY SLAB
•
𝐿𝑌
𝐿𝑋
< 2 THEN IT IS A TWO
WAYSLAB
•
𝐿
𝐷
= 32 (FOR CONTINUES
BEAM,
𝐿
𝐷
=26 , BUT TAKEN A
SLIGHTLY GREATER VALUE
FOR SLAB )
• BENDING MOMENT:
FOR SPAN MOMENT
(SAGGING);
a) END SPAN =
1
12
× 𝑤𝑙2
b) INTERIOR SUPPORT
=
1
16
× 𝑤𝑙2
23
EQUATIONS USED:-
• BENDING MOMENT:
FOR SUPPORT MOMENT
(HOGGING);
a) AT SUPPORT NEXT TO
END SUPPORT = -
1
10
× 𝑤𝑙2
b) INTERIOR SUPPORT
= -
1
12
× 𝑤𝑙2
• REINFORCEMENT =
0.87 × 𝐹𝑌 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 ×d [1-
𝐴𝑠𝑡× 𝐹𝑌
𝑏𝑑×𝑓𝑐𝑘
]

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (TWO WAY SLAB)
24
• LY = 6400 MM
• LX = 4950 MM
• LIVE LOAD= 3 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
• SURFACE FINISH= 1 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
• D = 120 MM D = 145 MM
• 10 MM DIA BAR @ 130 MM C/C
• LOAD = 14.06𝑘𝑁/𝑚
FIG: 13

•
𝐿𝑌
𝐿𝑋
> 2 THEN IT IS A ONE
WAY SLAB
•
𝐿𝑌
𝐿𝑋
< 2 THEN IT IS A TWO
WAY SLAB
•
𝐿
𝐷
= 32 (FOR CONTINUES
BEAM,
𝐿
𝐷
=26 , BUT TAKEN A
SLIGHTLY GREATER VALUE
FOR SLAB )
• BENDING MOMENT:
• 𝑀𝑥 = 𝛼𝑥𝑤𝑙𝑥
2
• 𝑀𝑦 = 𝛼𝑦𝑤𝑙𝑥
2
25
EQUATIONS USED:-
• REINFORCEMENT =
𝑝𝑡 = 50 ×
𝑓𝑐𝑘
𝑓𝑦
1 −
1−4⋅6𝑀𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘×𝑏𝑑2
• 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =
𝑝𝑡
100
× 𝑏 × 𝑑

26
DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (BEAM)
• D = 457 MM D = 500 MM
• LOAD= 107.3625 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
• 25 MM DIA BARS 6 NOS AT THE TENSION SIDE
• 20 MM DIA BARS 5 NOS AT COMPRESSION
• 8 MM DIA (120,140,150)MM C/C STIRRUPS
FIG: 14
FIG: 14.1

•
𝐿
𝐷
= 15
• BENDING MOMENT =
𝑤𝐿2
12
• 𝑉
𝑢 =
𝑤𝐿
2
LOAD DISTRIBUTION
27
EQUATIONS USED:-
• REINFORCEMENT
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐴𝑠𝑡1
+ 𝐴𝑠𝑡2
 𝐴𝑠𝑡1
=
0⋅36𝑓𝑐𝑘×𝑏 𝑥𝑢,lim
0⋅87𝑓𝑦
 𝐴𝑠𝑡2 =
𝐴𝑠𝑐 𝑓𝑠𝑐
0.87 𝑓𝑦
FIG: 15

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (COLUMN)
28
• FACTORED LOAD
= 1448.98 𝑘𝑁
• D = 450 B = 250
• H =3000 MM
• LONGITUDINAL
BARS 16MM DIA
12 NOS
• LATERAL TIES 8
MM DIA BARS
(300,150,120) MM
C/C
FIG: 16
FIG: 16.1

• PT VALUE LIES
BETWEEN0.8 AND 6%
• DIAMETER OF THE TIE
=
1
4
× ∅
LOAD DISTRIBUTION
29
EQUATIONS USED:-
FIG: 17

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (FOOTING)
30
• TOTAL LOAD ON SOIL = 1594 𝑘𝑁
• NET UPWARD PRESSURE (P) =
271.546 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
• 16 NOS 12 MM DIA (IN BOTH
DIRECTION)
• L=2.310 M
• D= 600 MM
FIG: 18

• NET UPWARD
PRESSURE (P)
=
𝐹𝐴𝐶𝑇𝑂𝑅𝐸𝐷 𝐿𝑂𝐴𝐷 𝑂𝐹 𝐶𝑂𝐿𝑈𝑀
AREA OF FOOTING
• 𝑀𝑢 LIM=
0.13× 𝑓𝑐𝑘 × 𝑏 × 𝑑2
31
EQUATIONS USED:-
• REINFORCEMENT
=
𝑀𝑢
𝑏×𝑑2
• 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =
𝑝𝑡
100
× 𝑏 × 𝑑

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (DOG LEGGED STAIRCASE)
32
• FACTORED LOAD = 17.25𝑘𝑁/𝑚
• D = 220 MM(WAIST SLAB)
FIG: 18

• EFFECTIVE
DEPTH OF SLAB
=
𝐿
20
𝑇𝑂
𝐿
25
(WHICHEVER IS
SMALLER)
33
EQUATIONS USED:-
• REINFORCEMENT
= 𝑝𝑡 = 50 ×
𝑓𝑐𝑘
𝑓𝑦
1 −
1−4⋅6𝑀𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘×𝑏𝑑2
𝐴𝑠𝑡 =
𝑝𝑡
100
× 𝑏 × 𝑑

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (SEPTIC TANK)
34
• NO OF
POPULATION = 140
NOS
• WATER SUPPLY =
200 LIT/PER/DAY
• LENGTH = 4.82 M
• BREADTH = 2.41 M
• D = 2.3 M
FIG: 19

• NO OF POPULATION
=
𝐵𝑈𝐼𝐿𝐷 𝑈𝑃 𝐴𝑅𝐸𝐴
5.9
• TOTAL WASTE WATER
COMING TO SEPTIC
TANK
= NO OF PERSONS ×
80% 𝑂𝐹 𝑊𝐴𝑇𝐸𝑅 𝑆𝑈𝑃𝑃𝐿𝑌
35
EQUATIONS USED:-

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES (SOAK PIT)
36
• DIAMETER OF SOAK PIT =
1.64 M
• WASTE WATER COMING
OUT FROM SEPTIC TANK =
22400 LITRES/DAY
• PERCOLATION RATE = 4200
LITRE/M3/DAY
FIG: 20

ABSTRACT ESTIMATE
• GROUND
FLOOR AND
FIRST FLOOR =
1,66,21,209.32/-
• SLAB =
4,32,712.26/-
• BEAM =
35,91,964.5/-
• STAIRCASE =
86,069.42/-
• SEPTIC TANK =
46,374.47/-
• SOAK PIT =
15,249/-
GRANT TOTAL
FOR BUILDING =
2,30,48,317/-
FOR THE
ABSTRACT COST
SPWD SCHEDULE
OF RATES HAS
BEEN FOLLOWED
AND A TOTAL
COST OF
2,30,48,317 HAS
BEEN
CALCULATED
37

CONCLUSION
38
• THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE LAYOUT OF G+1
PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING USING AUTO CAD
• DESIGNED MANUALLY.
• THE LAYOUT OF THE PROPOSED G+1 SCHOOL
BUILDING IS BASED ON A PLOT OF 2556.9631M2
LOCATED NEAR COLLEGE.
• ALL THE DRAFTING WAS DONE USING AUTO CAD.
• THE COST ESTIMATE FOR THE PROJECT HAS BEEN
CALCULATED USING CENTERLINE METHOD IN
MICROSOFT EXCEL.
• FOR THE ABSTRACT COST SPWD SCHEDULE OF
RATES HAS BEEN FOLLOWED AND A TOTAL COST
OF 2,30,48,317 HAS BEEN CALCULATED.

• KERALA PANCHAYATH BUILDING
RULE
• NATIONAL BUILDING CODE
• IS 456:2000
• IS 13920 (DUCTILE DETAILING)
• SP 16
• SP 34 (STRUCTURAL DETAILING)
• ESTIMATION AND COSTING BY B N
DUTTA
• SANITARY ENGINEERING BY S C
RANGWALA
• WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY
ENGINEERING BY S K GARG
39
REFERENCE

FINAL YEAR DIPLOMA PROJECT (ESTIMATION, PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING)PROJECT.pptx

FINAL YEAR DIPLOMA PROJECT (ESTIMATION, PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING)PROJECT.pptx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to FINAL YEAR DIPLOMA PROJECT (ESTIMATION, PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING)PROJECT.pptx

Similar to FINAL YEAR DIPLOMA PROJECT (ESTIMATION, PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING)PROJECT.pptx (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

FINAL YEAR DIPLOMA PROJECT (ESTIMATION, PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PROPOSED SCHOOL BUILDING)PROJECT.pptx