SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 76
PRESENTATION
ON FINAL YEAR PROJECT
PROJECT TITLE:
SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY
COMMERCIAL CUM RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
GROUP MEMBERS:
ASIK MAHARJAN(070/BCE 01)
AJIT DHUNGANA (070/BCE/04)
BISHAL PAUDEL (070/BCE/20)
DINESH SHRESTHA (070/BCE/25)
SUPERVISOR:
ER. PRADIP PAUDEL
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
• SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE
• DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
• LIMITATION
• ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING
• METHODOLOGY
• LOAD CALCULATION
• MODELING
• DETAILING
• CONCLUSION
2
• This project deals with seismic resistance structural design
of the building.
• In the preliminary design phase the load (dead and live)
being applied in the structure is calculated.
• The component of the structure such as beam, column and
slab are designed based on these calculated load.
• Structural analysis program(SAP) has been used for
modeling of structure.
• Detail design of structural member is done on the basis of
IS 456 : 2000 & SP 16.
• The text book “reinforced concrete limit state design” by
A.K Jain is used as reference.
INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
3
SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE
• Identification of structural arrangement of plan.
• Getting familiar with structural software( SAP2000 ,AutoCAD)
• Getting real life experience with engineering practices
MAIN OBJECTIVES:
• Carrying out a complete analysis and design of the main structural
elements of a multi-storey building including slabs, columns,
shear walls and beams.
4
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Project : Seismic Analysis And Structural Design of Office-
Residential Building
Location : Kathmandu
Structure system : RCC framed structure
Plinth area : 277.44 m2
No. Of Storey : 6 Storey
Floor height : 2.8956 m
Concrete : M20
Rebar : Fe415
Soil type : Hard (assumed)
Slab : 125mm
Beam : 230mm * 450mm
Column : 450mm * 450mm
Type of Foundation : Mat Foundation (600mm)
Sesimic Zone : Zone V
5
I. WORKING STRESS METHOD
II. ULTIMATE LOAD METHOD
III. LIMIT STATE METHOD
(OUR PROJECT WAS DESIGNED USING THE
LIMIT STATE METHOD.)
6
DESIGN METHOD
IDENTIFICATION OF LOADS
• DEAD LOAD ARE CALCULATED AS PER IS 875 (PART 1)-
1987
• LIVE LOAD ARE CALCULATED AS PER IS 875 (PART 2)-1987
• SEISMIC LOAD ACCORDING TO IS 1893(PART 1)-2002
CONSIDERING KATHMANDU LOCATED AT ZONE V
7
LIMITATION
 EARLY FEASIBILITY OF THE PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO BE
DONE.
 BUILDING IS MODIFIED ARCHITECTURALLY.
 DATA MANIPULATION IS CHECKED MANUALLY WITH
UNDERLYING CONCEPT BUT SOME SIMILAR SECTIONS ARE
RELIED SOLELY OF SOFTWARE DUE TO TIME LIMITATION.
 BASEMENT WALL IS NOT DESIGNED IN MAT FOUNDATION.
 WIND LOAD WAS NOT CONSIDERED DURING THE DESIGN.
 BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SITE WAS ASSUMED.
 IN PLANE STIFFNESS OF WALL WAS NOT CONSIDERED.
 SAP MODAL OF STAIRCASE WAS NOT MADE.
8
ARCHITECTURE
DRAWING
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
METHODOLOGY
Output of data from SAP ( Max. BM, Max. SF., Max. AF, reinforcement area etc.)
Modeling of structure
in SAP 2000
Run of SAP model
Input of loads in
model
Dead load calculation Live load calculation
Design of structural members using output
of SAP data, IS code and Excel Programming
Detailing of structural members
Verification of
critical sections
Data collection (Architectural Drawings)
Preliminary Designs
SAFE?
NO
YES
NOT OK
OK
Seismic load
calculation
17
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
• THE SECTION SHOULD BE GIVEN INITIALLY WHILE
DOING ANALYSIS IN ALMOST ALL SOFTWARES,
SO THE NEED OF PRELIMINARY DESIGN IS VITAL.
• PRELIMINARY DESIGN IS CARRIED OUT TO
ESTIMATE APPROXIMATE SIZE OF THE
STRUCTURAL MEMBERS BEFORE ANALYSIS OF
STRUCTURE.
• PRELIMINARY DESIGN WAS CARRIED OUT FOR
SLAB, BEAM AND COLUMN.
18
MAIN BEAM :
MAX. SPAN OF MAIN BEAM IN X-DIRECTION, L =4.496M
DEPTH OF BEAM = L/15 = 299.733MM
ADOPT DEPTH OF BEAM = 400MM
EFFECTIVE COVER = 50 MM
OVERALL DEPTH, D = 450 MM
PROVIDE OVERALL DEPTH, D= 450 MM
PROVIDE WIDTH OF BEAM =230 MM
19
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR BEAM
DIMENSIONS OF THE BIGGEST ROOM = (3.934M X 4.4196M)
SHORTER SPAN OF ROOM C/C = 3.934M
FROM IS 456:2000 CL. 23.2.1
FROM DEFLECTION CRITERIA,
𝒍𝒙
𝒅
= 𝜶𝜷𝜸𝜹𝝀
𝜶= 26 FOR CONTINUOUS SLAB
𝜷 = 𝜸= 𝜹= 𝝀 = 1 (ASSUME)
SO, D = 3.934 *1/26 = 151.42 MM
ADOPTED = 100MM AND
D = 100 + 25 = 125 MM
EFFECTIVE COVER = 25 MM
20
PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF SLAB
 COLUMN:
• LOAD ON CRITICAL COLUMN =147.6351KN FROM ONE
FLOOR
• SELF WT OF COLUMN=3% OF 147.6351 = 4.43 KN (ASSUME)
• NO. O F STOREY =6
• WORKING LOAD ON CRITICAL COLUMN (P)
=(147.6351+4.43)*6
=912.4 KN
• TOTAL FACTORED LOAD ON CRITICAL COLUMN
(PU)=1.5*P
=1368.586KN
• ASSUME % OF STEEL(P)=2%
• PU=0.4*FCK*AC+0.67FY*ASC
• PROVIDE 350MM*350MM SQUARE COLUMN.
21
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR COLUMN
22
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
DIMENSION
SLAB 125mm
BEAM 230mm*450mm
COLUMN 350mm*350mm
CM AND CS CALCULATION
• CENTRE OF MASS:
FOR GROUND FLOOR
XM= 15.291M YM=9.002M
FOR 1ST TO 5TH FLOOR(SAME)
XM= 15.423M YM=8.851M
• CENTRE OF STIFFNESS
FOR GROUND FLOOR
XS= 15.196M YS=8.494M
FOR 1ST TO 5TH FLOOR(SAME)
XS= 15.156M YS=8.540M
23
CALCUALTION OF ECENTRICITY
• FOR GROUND FLOOR
o FOR 1ST TO 5TH FLOOR (SAME)
FOR PERMISSIBLE ECCENTRICITY(5% OF LATERAL LENGTH)
24
ex = 0.095 m
ey = 0.508 m
ex = 0.267 m
ey = 0.311 m
ex = 1.44272 m
ey = 0.7048 m
CALCUALTION OF BASE SHEAR
•Seismic load:As per IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) :2002
Wi= Total dead load + Reduced live load
Reduced live load:
If L.L>=3 KN/m², RLL = 50% of LL
if L.L< 3 KN/m², RLL = 25% of LL
For roof, RLL= 0
Base shear(VB)=Ah*W (Clause 7.7.1)
Ah =(Z*I*Sa)/(2*g*R)
Where, Ah=Horizontal acceleration coefficient
W=Seismic weight of the structure
z=Zone factor given in Table 2
I=Importance factor in table 6
R=Response reduction factor in table 7
Sa/g=Average response acceleration
coefficient in fig 2
25
NOW,
Lateral force (Qi) =(Vb*Wi*Hi^2)/∑(Wi*Hj^2)
where
Qi =Design lateral force at floor i,
Wi =Seismic weight of floor i,
hi =Height of floor I from base
n =No. of story in the building
26
CALCULATION OF SEISMIC WIEGHT
Floor
Dead Load
(KN)
Live Load
(KN/m2)
Total Seismic
Weight (KN)
Top roof 67.826 0 67.82648
Roof 608.157 1.5 608.1573
5st 4280.297 2.5 4441.671
4nd 4280.297 2.5 4441.671
3rd 4280.297 2.5 4441.671
2th 4280.297 2.5 4441.671
1th 4280.297 2.5 4441.671
Total Seismic Weight = 22208.35
27
BASE SHEAR IN X-DIRECTION
EL in X-direction
Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.09h/√d Clause 7.6.2; IS 1893:2002
Height of Building(h) = 20.269m
Base dimension of Building at PL(d) = 29.794m
Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.334sec
Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient
(Ah) = Clause 6.4.2; IS 1893:2002
Where
Zone Factor (Z) = 0.36 For Seismic Zone V Annex of CI.7.6.1 IS 1893:2002
Importance Factor (I) = 1 Table 6 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002
Response Reduction Factor ( R) = 5SMRF Table 7 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002
For Hard soil and T=0.334
Avg.Response Acceleration coefficient
(Sa/g) = 2.5 Clause 6.4.5; IS 1893:2002
Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient
(Ah) = 0.090
Design Base Shear(VB) = Ah*W Clause 7.5.3; IS 1893:2002
1998.752KN
28
BASE SHEAR IN Y-DIRECTION
Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.09h/√d Clause 7.6.2; IS 1893:2002
Height of Building(h) = 20.269m
Base dimension of Building at PL(d) = 14.097m
Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.486sec
Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient
(Ah) = Clause 6.4.2; IS 1893:2002
0
Where
Zone Factor (Z) = 0.36 For Seismic Zone V Annex of CI.7.6.1 IS 1893:2002
Importance Factor (I) = 1 Table 6 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002
Response Reduction Factor ( R) = 5SMRF Table 7 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002
For Hard soil and T=0.571sec
Avg.Response Acceleration coefficient
(Sa/g) = 2.058 Clause 6.4.5; IS 1893:2002
Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient
(Ah) = 0.074
Design Base Shear(VB) = Ah*W Clause 7.5.3; IS 1893:2002
1645.536KN
29
DISTRIBUTION OF BASE SHEAR
Distribution of Base Shear
Floor Wi(KN) hi(m) Wi *hi
2
Base Shear (VB)
Design Lateral
force (Qi) Lateral Shear (Vi)
X(KN) Y(KN) X(KN) Y(KN) X(KN) Y(KN)
Top roof 67.8264773 20 27873.561 1998.75185 1645.536 24.648 20.292 24.648 20.292
Roof 608.157292 17 183618.12 1998.752 1645.536 162.369 133.676 187.017 153.968
5st 4441.67077 14 931286.89 1998.752 1645.536 823.516 677.985 1010.533 831.953
4nd 4441.67077 12 596023.61 1998.752 1645.536 527.050 433.911 1537.583 1265.864
3rd 4441.67077 8.7 335263.28 1998.752 1645.536 296.466 244.075 1834.049 1509.939
2th 4441.67077 5.8 149005.9 1998.752 1645.536 131.763 108.478 1965.811 1618.417
1th 4441.67077 2.9 37251.476 1998.752 1645.536 32.941 27.119 1998.752 1645.536
Total = 2260322.8
30
SAP MODELING
31
OUTPUT FROM SAP
32
OUTPUT OF SAP
33
TABLE: Base Reactions
OutputCase CaseType GlobalFX GlobalFY GlobalFZ
Text Text KN KN KN
eqx LinStatic -2013.905 1.707E-12 1.535E-12
eqy LinStatic 1.269E-11 -1918.677 -5.116E-12
34
TABLE: Modal Load Participation Ratios
OutputCase ItemType Item Static Dynamic
Text Text Text Percent Percent
MODAL Acceleration UX 99.9591 97.1237
MODAL Acceleration UY 99.9595 96.9604
MODAL Acceleration UZ 0.3459 0.0487
35
TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios
OutputCase StepType StepNum Period UX UY UZ SumUX SumUY
Text Text Unitless Sec Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless
MODAL Mode 1 0.814023 0.02005 0.54267 0.000008431 0.02005 0.54267
MODAL Mode 2 0.775679 0.22627 0.23348 4.677E-08 0.24632 0.77615
MODAL Mode 3 0.744852 0.5718 0.02763 4.514E-08 0.81812 0.80378
MODAL Mode 4 0.260856 0.00299 0.07463 0.00005284 0.82112 0.87841
MODAL Mode 5 0.24787 0.05004 0.03008 3.324E-07 0.87116 0.90849
MODAL Mode 6 0.239516 0.05134 0.01118 6.62E-08 0.9225 0.91968
MODAL Mode 7 0.149995 0.00097 0.02128 0.00005464 0.92347 0.94095
MODAL Mode 8 0.14263 0.03245 0.0042 0.000003289 0.95592 0.94515
MODAL Mode 9 0.134987 0.00376 0.0164 0.000001996 0.95968 0.96155
MODAL Mode 10 0.111629 0.00885 0.00271 0.00008696 0.96853 0.96426
MODAL Mode 11 0.110814 0.00267 0.00533 0.00028 0.9712 0.96959
MODAL Mode 12 0.104052 0.00003894 0.00001733 7.982E-07 0.97124 0.9696
36
TABLE: Modal Periods And Frequencies
OutputCase StepType StepNum Period Frequency CircFreq Eigenvalue
Text Text Unitless Sec Cyc/sec rad/sec rad2/sec2
MODAL Mode 1 0.814023 1.2285 7.7187 59.578
MODAL Mode 2 0.775679 1.2892 8.1002 65.614
MODAL Mode 3 0.744852 1.3425 8.4355 71.157
MODAL Mode 4 0.260856 3.8335 24.087 580.17
MODAL Mode 5 0.24787 4.0344 25.349 642.56
MODAL Mode 6 0.239516 4.1751 26.233 688.16
MODAL Mode 7 0.149995 6.6669 41.889 1754.7
MODAL Mode 8 0.14263 7.0112 44.052 1940.6
MODAL Mode 9 0.134987 7.4081 46.547 2166.6
MODAL Mode 10 0.111629 8.9583 56.286 3168.2
MODAL Mode 11 0.110814 9.0241 56.7 3214.9
MODAL Mode 12 0.104052 9.6106 60.385 3646.3
OUTPUT FROM SAP
DIMENSION
• BEAM:
230MM*450MM
• COLUMN:
450MM*450MM
37
DETAIL DESIGN
38
SLAB DESIGN
39
40
Determine factored load
W=1.5(DL+LL)
Determine ratio ly/lx
Two way slab
One way slab
Determine moment
coefficient IS 456 ,table 12
Calculate moment at mid , edge
M=wlx
2/12
Determine type of panel
e.g. one long end discontinuous
Determine moment coeff. IS
456 Table 26 e.g. mid ,edge
Calculate Mx=αxwlx
2
My= αywlx
2
Calculate area of steel Ast
M = 0.87 fYAst (d-fY Ast / fckd)
Determine spacing
of bars
Sv = Abar/Agross*1000
Ast>Astmin
=0.12%bD
Sv
<300mm
or 3d
No
Yes
FLOW CHART
OF
SLAB DESIGN
If ly/lx <2
• SLAB (TWO WAY) :
LY=4.496 M
LX=4.420 M
DESIGN LOAD,W ==10.838 KN/M2
GRADE OF CONCRETE = 20 MPA
STRENGTH OF STEEL =415 MPA
AREA OF STEELALONG LONG SPAN
SPACING 8MM Ø@ 100 MM C/C (AT SUPPORT TOP BARS)
8MM Ø@ 175 MM C/C (AT MIDDLE BOTTOM BARS)
AREA OF STEELALONG SHORTER SPAN
SPACING 8 MM Ø@ 175MM C/C (AT SUPPORT TOP BARS)
8MM Ø@ 175 MM C/C (AT MIDDLE BOTTOM BARS) 41
• SLAB (ONE WAY) :
LY=1.6002 M
LX=2.937 M
DESIGN LOAD,W ==10.838 KN/M2
GRADE OF CONCRETE = 20 MPA
STRENGTH OF STEEL =415 MPA
AREA OF STEELALONG LONG SPAN
SPACING 8MM Ø@ 300 MM
AREA OF STEELALONG SHORTER SPAN
SPACING 8 MM Ø@ 175 MM
42
wlx
2
SLAB DETAILING
AND DRAWING
43
44
45
46
TWO WAY WAY SLAB SECTION
47
ONE WAY WAY SLAB SECTION
48
DESIGN OF
BEAM
49
50
Take moment of each beam (Mu)
Calcualte Mlim
Mlim=0.133fckbd2
If Mu< Mlim
Under reinforced section
Over reinforced section
Calcualate M= Mu-Mlim
Calcualte Ast1 from Mlim by
Ast1= Mlim/ (0.87*fy*(d-0.42*xlim))
Calcualte Ast from
Mu= 0.87fy Ast(d-0.42xu)
Calculate
No. of bars = Ast/Abar
Calculate Asc by Asc=M/(fsc*(d-d’))
Ast >Ast min=
0.12% of bD
No
Yes
FLOW CHART
OF
BEAM DESIGN
(Moment Bar)
Calculate Ast2 by
Ast2=M/(0.87*fy*(d-d’))
Calculate Ast =Ast1 + Ast2
Calculate
N0. of bars= Ast/Abar
Ast >Ast min=
0.12% of bD
DESIGN RESULTS
• BEAM =2F-34
• SIZE OF BEAM = 230MM*450 MM
• STIRRUPS 8MM DIA 2-LEGGED :
@ 200MM C/C AT MID PORTION
@ 100MM C/C AT SUPPORT
51
All bars
20mm Ø Left end mid span Right end
Top 4 2 4
Bottom 4 2 4
52
BEAM
DEATILING AND
DRAWING
53
BEAM SECTION
54
BEAM’S STIRRUPS
55
COLUMN
DESIGN
56
57
Select Maximum
Mu= /M2/ + /M3/
Mux = /M2/ & Muy = /M3/
Calculate moment due to
minimum eccentricity by
Muxe = Pu * ey & Muye = Pu * ex
Take corresponding (Pu)
Assume d’ and find ratio d’/D
Assume suitable Asc and
find p= Asc/(B*D)
Mux = Max. of Mux and Muxe
Muy = Max. of Muy and Muye
Design as biaxial bending
Yes
FLOW CHART
OF
COLUMN
The assumed reinforcement is OK
Calculate minimum
eccentricity ex and ey
C
Determine Muxl, Muyl using
appropriate chart from SP-16 with
ratios p/fck, d’/D and Pu/ (fck*BD)
Calulate the ratios
Pu/(fck*BD) and p/fck
IncreaseAsc (steel
reinforcement) and find p.
Calculate Pu/Puz
Determine αn from table
from Pu/Puz and αn
C
If (Mux/Mux1) αn +
(Mux/Mux1) αn >1
No
RESULT OF COLUMN DESIGN
• GRADE OF CONCRETE = 20 MPA
• STRENGTH OF STEEL =415 MPA
• OVERALL DEPTH OF COLUMN, D = 450MM
• WIDTH OF COLUMN, B =450BMM
• HEIGHT, L = 2.8956M
• EFFECTIVE COVER =45MM
• DIAMETER OF LONGITUDINAL REBAR , Φ=20MM
58
59
1064 1c2 686.365 95.1469 21.3503 8 12 1.861 0.42709
1064 1c2 683.478 36.0626 163.046 7 12 1.861 0.75211
no. of
rod
Pt(%) Check
Frame
Column
ID.
Factored
Load(K
Mx (KN-
m)
My (KN-
m)
Comb
No.
φ(mm) No.of bar Pitch(mm)
Longitudinal 20 12
Lateral ties 8 250
Confining 8 100
60
COLUMN
DETAILING AND
DRAWING 61
62
63
STAIRCASE
DESIGN
64
GEOMETRY OF STAIR- CASE
• TYPE OF STAIR – CASE = DOG-LEGGED
• WIDTH OF STAIR-CASE = 1500 MM
• NO. RISERS = 12 NOS.
• TREAD = 240 MM
• RISER = 120 MM
• FLOOR TO FLOOR HEIGHT = 1.448M
65
DESIGN STEPS OF STAIRCASE
66
• Thickness of waist slab
• Calculation of load on flight and landing
• Calculation of moment
• Calculation of depth
• Calculation of steel
• Check for shear
• Check for development length
DETAILING
DESIGN RESULTS
• OVERALL DEPTH(D)= 225 MM
• REINFORCEMENT :-
• LONGITUDINAL BAR 10 MM DIA @ 80 MM C/C
• DISTRIBUTION BAR 8 MM BAR @ 180MM C/C
• LD = 475 MM
67
STAIRCASE DETAILING AND DRAWING
68
69
DESIGN OF
FOOTING
70
MAT FOUNDATION
• FOR EARTH QUAKE CONSIDERATION ALSO SOIL
BEARING CAPACITY (FACTORED) =150KN/M2
• SUMMATION OF FORCES= 34185.3KN
• DEPTH OF FOUNDATION REQUIRED=508.614MM
• DEPTH OF FOUNDATION PROVIDED=600MM WITH
EFFECTIVE COVER 50MM
• PROVIDE 20MM BARS@200MMC/C AT TOP AND
BOTTOM IN BOTH DIRECTIONS.
71
FOUNDATION
DRAWING
72
73
74
75
CONCLUSION
•The various structural component of the building are
made designed safe as well as economic as far as
possible.
•The complicated task is made simpler one using SAP.
•We got more confidence after tackling with various
problem during the structural analysis and design.
76
THANK YOU

More Related Content

Similar to Fianl Year Project.pptx

Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staadDesign and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staadgopichand's
 
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staadDesign and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staadgopichand's
 
Passive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI Auditorium
Passive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI AuditoriumPassive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI Auditorium
Passive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI AuditoriumIRJET Journal
 
A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3
A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3
A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3Andrei Loata
 
Basement wall design
Basement wall designBasement wall design
Basement wall designCETCBIM
 
Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).
Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).
Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).khaledalshami93
 
Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01
Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01
Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01Ramil Artates
 
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODECOMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODEIRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...
IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...
IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...IRJET Journal
 
Baf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptx
Baf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptxBaf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptx
Baf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptxDES Engineers Ltd
 
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxDP NITHIN
 
finalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
finalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdffinalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
finalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdfAbdurRazzak187410
 
IRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic Zones
IRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic ZonesIRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic Zones
IRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic ZonesIRJET Journal
 
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdfChandrasekaran A
 
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdfArjunanChandrasekara
 
EarthQuake Reistant Building
EarthQuake Reistant BuildingEarthQuake Reistant Building
EarthQuake Reistant BuildingHemant Srivastava
 
Structural Steel Design Project.pdf
Structural Steel Design Project.pdfStructural Steel Design Project.pdf
Structural Steel Design Project.pdfdynamicchikku06
 

Similar to Fianl Year Project.pptx (20)

Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staadDesign and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
 
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staadDesign and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
Design and analasys of a g+3 residential building using staad
 
Passive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI Auditorium
Passive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI AuditoriumPassive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI Auditorium
Passive Cooling Design Feature for Energy Efficient in PERI Auditorium
 
A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3
A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3
A.2. CALCULATION SUMMARY C3
 
gp2_2.pptx
gp2_2.pptxgp2_2.pptx
gp2_2.pptx
 
Basement wall design
Basement wall designBasement wall design
Basement wall design
 
Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).
Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).
Graduation Project (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-TOWER STRUCTURE USING ETABS).
 
Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01
Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01
Example314b taskgroupb-c-120730160543-phpapp01
 
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODECOMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
 
IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...
IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...
IRJET- Seismic Excitation using Lead Rubber Bearing in Low Rise to High Rise ...
 
Baf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptx
Baf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptxBaf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptx
Baf Shaheen College (B+12) ETABS Dynamic Analysis.pptx
 
design c
design cdesign c
design c
 
Design and analasys of a g+2 residential building
Design and analasys of a g+2 residential building Design and analasys of a g+2 residential building
Design and analasys of a g+2 residential building
 
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
 
finalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
finalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdffinalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
finalprojectreportg2-141218075116-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
 
IRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic Zones
IRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic ZonesIRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic Zones
IRJET- Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic Zones
 
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
 
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
22.sesmic analysis of building.pdf
 
EarthQuake Reistant Building
EarthQuake Reistant BuildingEarthQuake Reistant Building
EarthQuake Reistant Building
 
Structural Steel Design Project.pdf
Structural Steel Design Project.pdfStructural Steel Design Project.pdf
Structural Steel Design Project.pdf
 

Recently uploaded

Processing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptx
Processing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptxProcessing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptx
Processing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptxpranjaldaimarysona
 
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...srsj9000
 
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptxMicroscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptxpurnimasatapathy1234
 
HARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICS
HARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICSHARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICS
HARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICSRajkumarAkumalla
 
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IVHARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IVRajaP95
 
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escortsranjana rawat
 
VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130Suhani Kapoor
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidNikhilNagaraju
 
Call Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Serviceranjana rawat
 
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxwendy cai
 
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSCAESB
 
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their LimitationsExtrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations120cr0395
 
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLSMANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLSSIVASHANKAR N
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...Soham Mondal
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024hassan khalil
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Processing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptx
Processing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptxProcessing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptx
Processing & Properties of Floor and Wall Tiles.pptx
 
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
 
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptxMicroscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
Microscopic Analysis of Ceramic Materials.pptx
 
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCRCall Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
 
HARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICS
HARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICSHARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICS
HARDNESS, FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND STRENGTH OF CERAMICS
 
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IVHARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
 
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
(MEERA) Dapodi Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pune Escorts
 
VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Kondapur Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
 
Call Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls in Nagpur Suman Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(RIA) Call Girls Bhosari ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
 
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
 
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptxExploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
 
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
 
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their LimitationsExtrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations
 
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLSMANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
 

Fianl Year Project.pptx

  • 1. PRESENTATION ON FINAL YEAR PROJECT PROJECT TITLE: SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY COMMERCIAL CUM RESIDENTIAL BUILDING GROUP MEMBERS: ASIK MAHARJAN(070/BCE 01) AJIT DHUNGANA (070/BCE/04) BISHAL PAUDEL (070/BCE/20) DINESH SHRESTHA (070/BCE/25) SUPERVISOR: ER. PRADIP PAUDEL
  • 2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE • INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND • SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT • LIMITATION • ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING • METHODOLOGY • LOAD CALCULATION • MODELING • DETAILING • CONCLUSION 2
  • 3. • This project deals with seismic resistance structural design of the building. • In the preliminary design phase the load (dead and live) being applied in the structure is calculated. • The component of the structure such as beam, column and slab are designed based on these calculated load. • Structural analysis program(SAP) has been used for modeling of structure. • Detail design of structural member is done on the basis of IS 456 : 2000 & SP 16. • The text book “reinforced concrete limit state design” by A.K Jain is used as reference. INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND 3
  • 4. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE • Identification of structural arrangement of plan. • Getting familiar with structural software( SAP2000 ,AutoCAD) • Getting real life experience with engineering practices MAIN OBJECTIVES: • Carrying out a complete analysis and design of the main structural elements of a multi-storey building including slabs, columns, shear walls and beams. 4
  • 5. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project : Seismic Analysis And Structural Design of Office- Residential Building Location : Kathmandu Structure system : RCC framed structure Plinth area : 277.44 m2 No. Of Storey : 6 Storey Floor height : 2.8956 m Concrete : M20 Rebar : Fe415 Soil type : Hard (assumed) Slab : 125mm Beam : 230mm * 450mm Column : 450mm * 450mm Type of Foundation : Mat Foundation (600mm) Sesimic Zone : Zone V 5
  • 6. I. WORKING STRESS METHOD II. ULTIMATE LOAD METHOD III. LIMIT STATE METHOD (OUR PROJECT WAS DESIGNED USING THE LIMIT STATE METHOD.) 6 DESIGN METHOD
  • 7. IDENTIFICATION OF LOADS • DEAD LOAD ARE CALCULATED AS PER IS 875 (PART 1)- 1987 • LIVE LOAD ARE CALCULATED AS PER IS 875 (PART 2)-1987 • SEISMIC LOAD ACCORDING TO IS 1893(PART 1)-2002 CONSIDERING KATHMANDU LOCATED AT ZONE V 7
  • 8. LIMITATION  EARLY FEASIBILITY OF THE PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO BE DONE.  BUILDING IS MODIFIED ARCHITECTURALLY.  DATA MANIPULATION IS CHECKED MANUALLY WITH UNDERLYING CONCEPT BUT SOME SIMILAR SECTIONS ARE RELIED SOLELY OF SOFTWARE DUE TO TIME LIMITATION.  BASEMENT WALL IS NOT DESIGNED IN MAT FOUNDATION.  WIND LOAD WAS NOT CONSIDERED DURING THE DESIGN.  BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SITE WAS ASSUMED.  IN PLANE STIFFNESS OF WALL WAS NOT CONSIDERED.  SAP MODAL OF STAIRCASE WAS NOT MADE. 8
  • 10. 10
  • 11. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. 13
  • 14. 14
  • 15. 15
  • 16. 16
  • 17. METHODOLOGY Output of data from SAP ( Max. BM, Max. SF., Max. AF, reinforcement area etc.) Modeling of structure in SAP 2000 Run of SAP model Input of loads in model Dead load calculation Live load calculation Design of structural members using output of SAP data, IS code and Excel Programming Detailing of structural members Verification of critical sections Data collection (Architectural Drawings) Preliminary Designs SAFE? NO YES NOT OK OK Seismic load calculation 17
  • 18. PRELIMINARY DESIGN • THE SECTION SHOULD BE GIVEN INITIALLY WHILE DOING ANALYSIS IN ALMOST ALL SOFTWARES, SO THE NEED OF PRELIMINARY DESIGN IS VITAL. • PRELIMINARY DESIGN IS CARRIED OUT TO ESTIMATE APPROXIMATE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS BEFORE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE. • PRELIMINARY DESIGN WAS CARRIED OUT FOR SLAB, BEAM AND COLUMN. 18
  • 19. MAIN BEAM : MAX. SPAN OF MAIN BEAM IN X-DIRECTION, L =4.496M DEPTH OF BEAM = L/15 = 299.733MM ADOPT DEPTH OF BEAM = 400MM EFFECTIVE COVER = 50 MM OVERALL DEPTH, D = 450 MM PROVIDE OVERALL DEPTH, D= 450 MM PROVIDE WIDTH OF BEAM =230 MM 19 PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR BEAM
  • 20. DIMENSIONS OF THE BIGGEST ROOM = (3.934M X 4.4196M) SHORTER SPAN OF ROOM C/C = 3.934M FROM IS 456:2000 CL. 23.2.1 FROM DEFLECTION CRITERIA, 𝒍𝒙 𝒅 = 𝜶𝜷𝜸𝜹𝝀 𝜶= 26 FOR CONTINUOUS SLAB 𝜷 = 𝜸= 𝜹= 𝝀 = 1 (ASSUME) SO, D = 3.934 *1/26 = 151.42 MM ADOPTED = 100MM AND D = 100 + 25 = 125 MM EFFECTIVE COVER = 25 MM 20 PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF SLAB
  • 21.  COLUMN: • LOAD ON CRITICAL COLUMN =147.6351KN FROM ONE FLOOR • SELF WT OF COLUMN=3% OF 147.6351 = 4.43 KN (ASSUME) • NO. O F STOREY =6 • WORKING LOAD ON CRITICAL COLUMN (P) =(147.6351+4.43)*6 =912.4 KN • TOTAL FACTORED LOAD ON CRITICAL COLUMN (PU)=1.5*P =1368.586KN • ASSUME % OF STEEL(P)=2% • PU=0.4*FCK*AC+0.67FY*ASC • PROVIDE 350MM*350MM SQUARE COLUMN. 21 PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR COLUMN
  • 22. 22 PRELIMINARY DESIGN DIMENSION SLAB 125mm BEAM 230mm*450mm COLUMN 350mm*350mm
  • 23. CM AND CS CALCULATION • CENTRE OF MASS: FOR GROUND FLOOR XM= 15.291M YM=9.002M FOR 1ST TO 5TH FLOOR(SAME) XM= 15.423M YM=8.851M • CENTRE OF STIFFNESS FOR GROUND FLOOR XS= 15.196M YS=8.494M FOR 1ST TO 5TH FLOOR(SAME) XS= 15.156M YS=8.540M 23
  • 24. CALCUALTION OF ECENTRICITY • FOR GROUND FLOOR o FOR 1ST TO 5TH FLOOR (SAME) FOR PERMISSIBLE ECCENTRICITY(5% OF LATERAL LENGTH) 24 ex = 0.095 m ey = 0.508 m ex = 0.267 m ey = 0.311 m ex = 1.44272 m ey = 0.7048 m
  • 25. CALCUALTION OF BASE SHEAR •Seismic load:As per IS 1893 ( Part 1 ) :2002 Wi= Total dead load + Reduced live load Reduced live load: If L.L>=3 KN/m², RLL = 50% of LL if L.L< 3 KN/m², RLL = 25% of LL For roof, RLL= 0 Base shear(VB)=Ah*W (Clause 7.7.1) Ah =(Z*I*Sa)/(2*g*R) Where, Ah=Horizontal acceleration coefficient W=Seismic weight of the structure z=Zone factor given in Table 2 I=Importance factor in table 6 R=Response reduction factor in table 7 Sa/g=Average response acceleration coefficient in fig 2 25
  • 26. NOW, Lateral force (Qi) =(Vb*Wi*Hi^2)/∑(Wi*Hj^2) where Qi =Design lateral force at floor i, Wi =Seismic weight of floor i, hi =Height of floor I from base n =No. of story in the building 26
  • 27. CALCULATION OF SEISMIC WIEGHT Floor Dead Load (KN) Live Load (KN/m2) Total Seismic Weight (KN) Top roof 67.826 0 67.82648 Roof 608.157 1.5 608.1573 5st 4280.297 2.5 4441.671 4nd 4280.297 2.5 4441.671 3rd 4280.297 2.5 4441.671 2th 4280.297 2.5 4441.671 1th 4280.297 2.5 4441.671 Total Seismic Weight = 22208.35 27
  • 28. BASE SHEAR IN X-DIRECTION EL in X-direction Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.09h/√d Clause 7.6.2; IS 1893:2002 Height of Building(h) = 20.269m Base dimension of Building at PL(d) = 29.794m Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.334sec Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient (Ah) = Clause 6.4.2; IS 1893:2002 Where Zone Factor (Z) = 0.36 For Seismic Zone V Annex of CI.7.6.1 IS 1893:2002 Importance Factor (I) = 1 Table 6 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002 Response Reduction Factor ( R) = 5SMRF Table 7 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002 For Hard soil and T=0.334 Avg.Response Acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) = 2.5 Clause 6.4.5; IS 1893:2002 Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient (Ah) = 0.090 Design Base Shear(VB) = Ah*W Clause 7.5.3; IS 1893:2002 1998.752KN 28
  • 29. BASE SHEAR IN Y-DIRECTION Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.09h/√d Clause 7.6.2; IS 1893:2002 Height of Building(h) = 20.269m Base dimension of Building at PL(d) = 14.097m Fundamental Natural Period (T) = 0.486sec Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient (Ah) = Clause 6.4.2; IS 1893:2002 0 Where Zone Factor (Z) = 0.36 For Seismic Zone V Annex of CI.7.6.1 IS 1893:2002 Importance Factor (I) = 1 Table 6 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002 Response Reduction Factor ( R) = 5SMRF Table 7 (Clause 6.4.2); IS 1893:2002 For Hard soil and T=0.571sec Avg.Response Acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) = 2.058 Clause 6.4.5; IS 1893:2002 Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient (Ah) = 0.074 Design Base Shear(VB) = Ah*W Clause 7.5.3; IS 1893:2002 1645.536KN 29
  • 30. DISTRIBUTION OF BASE SHEAR Distribution of Base Shear Floor Wi(KN) hi(m) Wi *hi 2 Base Shear (VB) Design Lateral force (Qi) Lateral Shear (Vi) X(KN) Y(KN) X(KN) Y(KN) X(KN) Y(KN) Top roof 67.8264773 20 27873.561 1998.75185 1645.536 24.648 20.292 24.648 20.292 Roof 608.157292 17 183618.12 1998.752 1645.536 162.369 133.676 187.017 153.968 5st 4441.67077 14 931286.89 1998.752 1645.536 823.516 677.985 1010.533 831.953 4nd 4441.67077 12 596023.61 1998.752 1645.536 527.050 433.911 1537.583 1265.864 3rd 4441.67077 8.7 335263.28 1998.752 1645.536 296.466 244.075 1834.049 1509.939 2th 4441.67077 5.8 149005.9 1998.752 1645.536 131.763 108.478 1965.811 1618.417 1th 4441.67077 2.9 37251.476 1998.752 1645.536 32.941 27.119 1998.752 1645.536 Total = 2260322.8 30
  • 33. OUTPUT OF SAP 33 TABLE: Base Reactions OutputCase CaseType GlobalFX GlobalFY GlobalFZ Text Text KN KN KN eqx LinStatic -2013.905 1.707E-12 1.535E-12 eqy LinStatic 1.269E-11 -1918.677 -5.116E-12
  • 34. 34 TABLE: Modal Load Participation Ratios OutputCase ItemType Item Static Dynamic Text Text Text Percent Percent MODAL Acceleration UX 99.9591 97.1237 MODAL Acceleration UY 99.9595 96.9604 MODAL Acceleration UZ 0.3459 0.0487
  • 35. 35 TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios OutputCase StepType StepNum Period UX UY UZ SumUX SumUY Text Text Unitless Sec Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless MODAL Mode 1 0.814023 0.02005 0.54267 0.000008431 0.02005 0.54267 MODAL Mode 2 0.775679 0.22627 0.23348 4.677E-08 0.24632 0.77615 MODAL Mode 3 0.744852 0.5718 0.02763 4.514E-08 0.81812 0.80378 MODAL Mode 4 0.260856 0.00299 0.07463 0.00005284 0.82112 0.87841 MODAL Mode 5 0.24787 0.05004 0.03008 3.324E-07 0.87116 0.90849 MODAL Mode 6 0.239516 0.05134 0.01118 6.62E-08 0.9225 0.91968 MODAL Mode 7 0.149995 0.00097 0.02128 0.00005464 0.92347 0.94095 MODAL Mode 8 0.14263 0.03245 0.0042 0.000003289 0.95592 0.94515 MODAL Mode 9 0.134987 0.00376 0.0164 0.000001996 0.95968 0.96155 MODAL Mode 10 0.111629 0.00885 0.00271 0.00008696 0.96853 0.96426 MODAL Mode 11 0.110814 0.00267 0.00533 0.00028 0.9712 0.96959 MODAL Mode 12 0.104052 0.00003894 0.00001733 7.982E-07 0.97124 0.9696
  • 36. 36 TABLE: Modal Periods And Frequencies OutputCase StepType StepNum Period Frequency CircFreq Eigenvalue Text Text Unitless Sec Cyc/sec rad/sec rad2/sec2 MODAL Mode 1 0.814023 1.2285 7.7187 59.578 MODAL Mode 2 0.775679 1.2892 8.1002 65.614 MODAL Mode 3 0.744852 1.3425 8.4355 71.157 MODAL Mode 4 0.260856 3.8335 24.087 580.17 MODAL Mode 5 0.24787 4.0344 25.349 642.56 MODAL Mode 6 0.239516 4.1751 26.233 688.16 MODAL Mode 7 0.149995 6.6669 41.889 1754.7 MODAL Mode 8 0.14263 7.0112 44.052 1940.6 MODAL Mode 9 0.134987 7.4081 46.547 2166.6 MODAL Mode 10 0.111629 8.9583 56.286 3168.2 MODAL Mode 11 0.110814 9.0241 56.7 3214.9 MODAL Mode 12 0.104052 9.6106 60.385 3646.3
  • 37. OUTPUT FROM SAP DIMENSION • BEAM: 230MM*450MM • COLUMN: 450MM*450MM 37
  • 40. 40 Determine factored load W=1.5(DL+LL) Determine ratio ly/lx Two way slab One way slab Determine moment coefficient IS 456 ,table 12 Calculate moment at mid , edge M=wlx 2/12 Determine type of panel e.g. one long end discontinuous Determine moment coeff. IS 456 Table 26 e.g. mid ,edge Calculate Mx=αxwlx 2 My= αywlx 2 Calculate area of steel Ast M = 0.87 fYAst (d-fY Ast / fckd) Determine spacing of bars Sv = Abar/Agross*1000 Ast>Astmin =0.12%bD Sv <300mm or 3d No Yes FLOW CHART OF SLAB DESIGN If ly/lx <2
  • 41. • SLAB (TWO WAY) : LY=4.496 M LX=4.420 M DESIGN LOAD,W ==10.838 KN/M2 GRADE OF CONCRETE = 20 MPA STRENGTH OF STEEL =415 MPA AREA OF STEELALONG LONG SPAN SPACING 8MM Ø@ 100 MM C/C (AT SUPPORT TOP BARS) 8MM Ø@ 175 MM C/C (AT MIDDLE BOTTOM BARS) AREA OF STEELALONG SHORTER SPAN SPACING 8 MM Ø@ 175MM C/C (AT SUPPORT TOP BARS) 8MM Ø@ 175 MM C/C (AT MIDDLE BOTTOM BARS) 41
  • 42. • SLAB (ONE WAY) : LY=1.6002 M LX=2.937 M DESIGN LOAD,W ==10.838 KN/M2 GRADE OF CONCRETE = 20 MPA STRENGTH OF STEEL =415 MPA AREA OF STEELALONG LONG SPAN SPACING 8MM Ø@ 300 MM AREA OF STEELALONG SHORTER SPAN SPACING 8 MM Ø@ 175 MM 42 wlx 2
  • 44. 44
  • 45. 45
  • 46. 46
  • 47. TWO WAY WAY SLAB SECTION 47
  • 48. ONE WAY WAY SLAB SECTION 48
  • 50. 50 Take moment of each beam (Mu) Calcualte Mlim Mlim=0.133fckbd2 If Mu< Mlim Under reinforced section Over reinforced section Calcualate M= Mu-Mlim Calcualte Ast1 from Mlim by Ast1= Mlim/ (0.87*fy*(d-0.42*xlim)) Calcualte Ast from Mu= 0.87fy Ast(d-0.42xu) Calculate No. of bars = Ast/Abar Calculate Asc by Asc=M/(fsc*(d-d’)) Ast >Ast min= 0.12% of bD No Yes FLOW CHART OF BEAM DESIGN (Moment Bar) Calculate Ast2 by Ast2=M/(0.87*fy*(d-d’)) Calculate Ast =Ast1 + Ast2 Calculate N0. of bars= Ast/Abar Ast >Ast min= 0.12% of bD
  • 51. DESIGN RESULTS • BEAM =2F-34 • SIZE OF BEAM = 230MM*450 MM • STIRRUPS 8MM DIA 2-LEGGED : @ 200MM C/C AT MID PORTION @ 100MM C/C AT SUPPORT 51 All bars 20mm Ø Left end mid span Right end Top 4 2 4 Bottom 4 2 4
  • 52. 52
  • 57. 57 Select Maximum Mu= /M2/ + /M3/ Mux = /M2/ & Muy = /M3/ Calculate moment due to minimum eccentricity by Muxe = Pu * ey & Muye = Pu * ex Take corresponding (Pu) Assume d’ and find ratio d’/D Assume suitable Asc and find p= Asc/(B*D) Mux = Max. of Mux and Muxe Muy = Max. of Muy and Muye Design as biaxial bending Yes FLOW CHART OF COLUMN The assumed reinforcement is OK Calculate minimum eccentricity ex and ey C Determine Muxl, Muyl using appropriate chart from SP-16 with ratios p/fck, d’/D and Pu/ (fck*BD) Calulate the ratios Pu/(fck*BD) and p/fck IncreaseAsc (steel reinforcement) and find p. Calculate Pu/Puz Determine αn from table from Pu/Puz and αn C If (Mux/Mux1) αn + (Mux/Mux1) αn >1 No
  • 58. RESULT OF COLUMN DESIGN • GRADE OF CONCRETE = 20 MPA • STRENGTH OF STEEL =415 MPA • OVERALL DEPTH OF COLUMN, D = 450MM • WIDTH OF COLUMN, B =450BMM • HEIGHT, L = 2.8956M • EFFECTIVE COVER =45MM • DIAMETER OF LONGITUDINAL REBAR , Φ=20MM 58
  • 59. 59 1064 1c2 686.365 95.1469 21.3503 8 12 1.861 0.42709 1064 1c2 683.478 36.0626 163.046 7 12 1.861 0.75211 no. of rod Pt(%) Check Frame Column ID. Factored Load(K Mx (KN- m) My (KN- m) Comb No. φ(mm) No.of bar Pitch(mm) Longitudinal 20 12 Lateral ties 8 250 Confining 8 100
  • 60. 60
  • 62. 62
  • 63. 63
  • 65. GEOMETRY OF STAIR- CASE • TYPE OF STAIR – CASE = DOG-LEGGED • WIDTH OF STAIR-CASE = 1500 MM • NO. RISERS = 12 NOS. • TREAD = 240 MM • RISER = 120 MM • FLOOR TO FLOOR HEIGHT = 1.448M 65
  • 66. DESIGN STEPS OF STAIRCASE 66 • Thickness of waist slab • Calculation of load on flight and landing • Calculation of moment • Calculation of depth • Calculation of steel • Check for shear • Check for development length DETAILING
  • 67. DESIGN RESULTS • OVERALL DEPTH(D)= 225 MM • REINFORCEMENT :- • LONGITUDINAL BAR 10 MM DIA @ 80 MM C/C • DISTRIBUTION BAR 8 MM BAR @ 180MM C/C • LD = 475 MM 67
  • 69. 69
  • 71. MAT FOUNDATION • FOR EARTH QUAKE CONSIDERATION ALSO SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (FACTORED) =150KN/M2 • SUMMATION OF FORCES= 34185.3KN • DEPTH OF FOUNDATION REQUIRED=508.614MM • DEPTH OF FOUNDATION PROVIDED=600MM WITH EFFECTIVE COVER 50MM • PROVIDE 20MM BARS@200MMC/C AT TOP AND BOTTOM IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. 71
  • 73. 73
  • 74. 74
  • 75. 75 CONCLUSION •The various structural component of the building are made designed safe as well as economic as far as possible. •The complicated task is made simpler one using SAP. •We got more confidence after tackling with various problem during the structural analysis and design.