SlideShare a Scribd company logo
An-Najah National University
Faculty of Engineering
Civil Engineering Department
Terra Santa School Structural Design and Analysis
Prepared By:
Bara Shawahna Khaled Malhis Nadeem AL-Masri
Supervised By : Dr. Mahmud Dwaikat
OUTLINE
 Introduction & general description of the project
 3D modeling
 Shear walls design
 Design of columns
 Design of beams
 Slabs design
 Foundation design
INTRODUCTION
 Our Graduation project is the design of a school in Jericho
named as Terra Santa School. This school was designed by
Al-Diyar Consultant and we will check on their design.
 The school consists of three floors with total plan area of
(3866.5m2).
Scope of work
 SAP 2000 program will be used as main analysis tool.
 ACI 318-08 for design.
 Live loads are taken from ASCE 7 -05 code.
 UBC 97 for seismic design.
Methodology
MATERIALS USED IN THE PROJECT:
 Reinforced concrete
 The unit weight of concrete (𝛾) = 25 kN/m3.
 The required compressive strength after 28 days
 For slabs & beams fc is 25 MPa.
 For Columns ,shear walls & footing fc is 30 MPa.
 The yield steel bars required Fy = 420 MPa.
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
 For each block we chose the following floor system:
1. Block A ( one way ribs slab )
2. Block B ( one way ribs slab )
3. Block C ( two way ribs slab )
Blocks A & B.
It’s very clear to see that block A , B has a uniform grid for columns with clear
path of loading (one-way), therefore, we took the architectural layout for the
columns. Ribbed slabs are known for their economic efficiency. The thickness
calculation follows the ACI-318 code
Block C.
Block C has a different shape and dimensions and according to ACI – code
requirements the slab should be designed as two-way ribbed slab for
economic and deflection requirements. This is because the spans of each
panel in Block C have approximately equal lengths.
LOADS
Dead load:
 Own weight for one way slabs = 3.54 kN/m2 .
 Own weight for two way slabs = 4.86 kN/m2 .
 Super imposed load = 3 kN/m2 .
Live load:
 for all the class room = 2 KN/m2 .
 for corridors = 5 KN/m2.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN AGAINST SEISMIC
LOADS
 We will design the seismic load by using SAP2000. Several methods is
used in SAP for seismic which is:
 Dynamic analysis:
1. Response spectrum.
2. Time history.
 Equivalent static force
Equivalent static method will be used for comparison [Block A only] and
as a cross-check on the results of response spectrum analysis. Because
response spectrum is more realistic and covers the modal shapes of the
building, we will use it as a main tool for seismic design.
 The seismic force effect on the structure can be translated to equivalent
lateral force at the base of the structure and then this force will be
distributed to the different stories and then to the vertical structural
elements (frames and/ or shear walls).
 This method is best applied to Regular Structure only.
DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE BY EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE
METHOD (STATIC METHOD) FOR BLOCK A
 We will use the UBC97 method for analysis, because of available data and factors in
our region.
 The total design base shear in a given direction shall be determined from the
following formula:
 Where
𝑉 =
𝐶𝑣 𝐼
𝑅 𝑇
𝑤
1. Z= seismic zone factor.
2. I= importance factor.
3. R= Response Modification Factor
4. CV= velocity seismic coefficient.
5. W= the total dead load.
SEISMIC ZONE FACTOR Z
From this map the project in
Jericho Z = 0.3
CV AND CA TABLE
Soil type D
CV=0.54
Soil type D
Ca=0.36
IMPORTANCE FACTOR TABLE
I = 1.25
RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR “R” TABLE
The overall system is dual system
R for building between (4.2-6)
=5.6
T CALCULATION
 𝑇 = 𝐶𝑡(ℎ𝑛)
3
4
 Hn= height of structure in meters = 15m
 Ct = factor for this case =0.0488
 T= is the basic natural period of a simple one degree of freedom
system which is the time required to complete one whole cycle during
dynamic loading.
 And after calculation T=0.3719 sec, T from sap for block A =0.25 sec.
Difference can be due to presence of shear walls that increase the
stiffness of the building block.
 Then calculate 𝑉 =
0.54𝑋1.25
5.5𝑋0.3719
× w = 0.33W
 𝑉𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.11 𝑋 𝐶𝑎 𝑋 𝐼 𝑋 𝑊
 Vmin. = 0.11X0.36 X1.25X w=0.0396W
 Vmax=
2.5𝑋𝐶𝑎𝑋𝐼
𝑅
𝑊  0.2W
 Vmax= 0.20 W use it because it Vcalculated>Vmax
 For block A the weigh is = 12206 kN
 V=0.20 X12206 =2441.2kN
 From SAP Vtotal equivalent static force equal =2125kN.
 From SAP Vtotal Response spectrum equal =1950kN.
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
 We use sap to design and analyze the project the design response
spectrum is shown in
 We find CA=0.36,CV=0.54
Then we have this curve
 Then we should define a load cases in the X-direction, Y-direction, Z-
direction
 When we define X-direction for example:
 We scale factor is for X direction =
𝑔𝐼
𝑅
=
9.81𝑋1.25
5.6
= 2.227
 And 33% of it for to the other direction Y = 0.33X2.227=0.7329 ( as per
UBC97 and ASCE requirements)
.
3D MODELING
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
BLOCK B
BLOCK C
COMPATIBILITY CHECK
EQUILIBRIUM CHECK
FOR BLOCK A
 Dead load:
1. Slab dead load = area X slab own weight per square meter =1185.84
X 3.54=4136.4 kN
2. Shear wall load = walls volume X concrete weight per volume = 28.7 X0.3
X15 X 25=3288.75 kN
3. Columns dead load = column volume X concrete weight per volume =
30 X 15 X0.4 X 0.4 X 25=1800 kN
4. Beams dead load = beams volume X concrete weight per volume =
3691.4 kN
5. Total dead load = 12917.6 kN
6. Total dead load form SAP = 12956.699
7. % Error = 0.3% which is acceptable
 Live load:
Structure area X live load per square meter =1185.84 X 5 =5929.2 kN
Live load from SAP = 5929.2 kN
% Error = 0
 Superimposed dead load:
Structure area X superimposed load per square meter = 1185.84 X 4.5
= 5336.28 kN
Superimposed load from SAP = 5336.2 kN
% Error = 0
MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM CHECK
 We take block A as example to do this check. In this check we take the
moment from 3D modeling and find the weight and then comparing it
with the hand calculated weight
 Moment resulted from dead load in block A in beam B1 is:
 Calculating the moment =
39+44.75
2
+ 28.9 = 70.775 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚

𝑤×𝑙2
8
= 𝑀 ,
70.775×8
6.82 = 12.244
𝑘𝑁
𝑚
 To convert it to kilo newton per square meter divide it over tributary
area which equal 3 meter
 W = 4.08 kN/m2
 Calculated dead load = 3.54 kN/m2.
 % of error =
4.08−3.54
3.54
× 100% = 15%
 Check for sway and non-sway:

∑𝑃𝑢 𝑋 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
∑𝑉𝑢 𝑋 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
< 0.05

361300
6068820
= 0.059
 Its acceptable value.  non-sway
DESIGN OF SHEAR WALLS
 Design B2 in block B
 axial force value Pu < 0.1 Ag fc
 The maximum moment in the wall is 6824 kN.m
 Assume singly reinforced section with reinforcement at d= 0.8h:
 𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
 =
0.85×30
420
1 − 1 −
2×6824×106
0.85×0.9×300×45002×30
= 3 × 10−3
 𝐴𝑆 = 0.003 × 1000 × 300 =
900 𝑚𝑚2
𝑚
5∅16/𝑚
 𝑉
𝑐 =
1
6
× 𝑓𝑐
′
× 𝑏𝑤 × 𝑑=0.1666𝑥 30𝑥300𝑥4500/1000 = 1233𝑘𝑁
 Vu from sap =756 kN
 𝑉
𝑛 =
𝑉𝑢
∅
, 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ∅ = 0.75
 𝑉
𝑛 =
756
0.75
= 1008 𝑘𝑁
 𝑉
𝑐 > 𝑉
𝑛 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 =(1 ∅12/20𝑐𝑚)
DESIGN OF COLUMNS
DESIGN OF THE COLUMNS AGAINST SEISMIC
LOAD
 Columns in Category C4(110X50)cm
 We take the moment value from 3D –modal of
𝑀1
𝑀2
we have
𝑀1
𝑀2
=
312
298
= 1.04.

 For the effective length factor (K) we take the building non sway so we
take k from φmajor= φ a=
𝐸𝑐𝐼𝑐/𝑙𝑐
𝐸𝑏𝐼𝑏/𝑙𝑏
= 12.4 , φ b=50 and φ minor=
𝐸𝑐𝐼𝑐/𝑙𝑐
𝐸𝑏𝐼𝑏/𝑙𝑏
=
11.99 and φ b=50the which is between equal 0.98 take it 1.

𝐾𝐿
𝑅
= 34 − 12
𝑀1
𝑀2
 Check slenderness limit
1𝑋3000
0.3 ℎ
< 34 − 12
312
298
 non-slender column
 Using strength calculation, Pu<𝝫Pn for the same column, we got Ag =
5500000mm2. So the other dimension is5500000/500= 110mm. This
dimension should be larger or equal the least dimension so let it equal
500mm, so we took it equal to 500 mm
 The dimension of column 110X50 cm so Ag= 5500cm2
 Strength calculations for this column are done as follows:
 From SAP2000 and 3D-model we take Pu=8287 and it equal 𝝫Pn then
we go to the interaction diagram and take the steel ratio value= 0.012
 𝝫Pn/bh=15 =2.15 ksi
 ¥=h-2couver/h = 0.9
 Mu/bh2=1.44 = 0.2 ksi
𝑉
𝑐 =
1
6
× 𝑓𝑐
′
× 𝑏𝑤 × 𝑑 =⇒ 𝑉
𝑐 =
1
6
× 30 × 1100 × 460/1000 = 461.9 𝑘𝑁
𝑉
𝑛 =
𝑉
𝑢
∅
, 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ∅ = 0.75
𝑉
𝑛 =
88
0.75
= 117 𝑘𝑁
From SAP2000 the shear value on the column is equal 117 kN <463.9 it’s Ok
Since the column is not subjected to shear, we use minimum steel for shear reinforcement so as to hold vertical bars and
confine concrete.
The stirrup spacing must be the minimum of the following
•48 ds (diameter of stirrups)………..From code ACI 318-08
•16 db(diameter of bar) )………..From code ACI 318-08
•Least diminution of the section )………..From code ACI 318-08
•Not more than d/2……..From ACI 315-99
Therefore, use ᴓ10
•48 * 10 = 480 mm
•16 * 20= 320 mm
•500 mm
•460/2= 230 mm
Therefore use 4ᴓ10/150mm for stirrups along the column
Column Dimension Main Steel Stirrups
C1 40X40=1600 8ᴓ20 1ᴓ10/150mm
C2 50X50=2500 12ᴓ18 3ᴓ10/150mm
C3 85X50=4250 18ᴓ18 3ᴓ10/150mm
C4 110X50=5500 28ᴓ18 4ᴓ10/150mm
DESIGN OF BEAMS
 Beam distribution and categories
FOR BEAM B1 AT BLOCK A UNDER SEISMIC LOAD
(50X35 CM)
 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥
1.4
𝑓𝑦
,
0.25∗ 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
= 𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.00333,
0.00297

 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.00333
 For left span
 Negative moment need 1284 mm2 (5𝝫20 mm).
 For positive moment need 945 mm2 (4𝝫18 mm).

 For the right span
 Use (5𝝫20 mm) for top steel
 And (4𝝫18 mm) for bottom steel
DESIGN FOR SHEAR
 Near the column face

𝐴𝑣
𝑠
= 0.774
 𝑠 =
157
0.774
= 200 𝑚𝑚
 Use 1 𝝫 10 /100 mm
 At the middle

𝐴𝑣
𝑠
= 0.292
 S=500> S max
 So use S max 230 mm
 Use 1 𝝫 10 /150 mm
 Right span

𝐴𝑣
𝑠
= 0.596
 S= 263 mm > S max
 Use 1 𝝫 10 /100mm
SLAB DESIGN
 The maximum span length is about 2.7m as shown in Block A,B Map,
and therefore the thickness of the slab (assumed one-way ribbed)
according to the table will be L /18.5 =15 cm and we used 20 cm for
block A& B(S1).
 The maximum span length is about 7.55m as shown in Block C Map,
and therefore the thickness of the slab two-way ribbed according to the
table will be Ln /30 =25.1 cm and we used 30 cm.
 For Slab S1 at block A (20 cm):
 Slab S1 is one way ribbed slab with 9 spans 2.7m for each.
 Dead and super imposed load = 8.04 kN/m2
 Live load= 5kN/m2 due to corridor live load.
 All 𝜌 value is less than 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 so use 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 for design.
 Asmin = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 X bw X d= 0.0033X120X180=72mm .Used 2ᶲ10.(As bottom steel
 Top rib steel
All 𝜌 value is less than 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 so use 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 for design.
 Asmin = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 X bw X d= 0.0033X120X180=72mm .Used 2ᶲ10.
 For Shrinkage net steel
 Asmin = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 X b X d= 0.0018X1000X60=108mm2 Used 2ᶲ8
DESIGN FOR TWO WAY RIBBED SLAB IN BLOCK C
m11 (x-direction moment)
 For left span the positive moment is
 Mu =
86.4
(18.7−15.8)
= 29.8 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
 𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀𝑢
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
= 0.0092
 As = 𝜌 X bw X d= 0.0092X120X280=310 mm
 Use 2𝝫16
 For right span the positive moment is
 Mu =
30
16.5−15.5
= 30 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
 𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀𝑢
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
= 0.00928
 As = 𝜌 X bw X d= 0.00928 X 120 X280= 310 mm
 Use 2∅16
 Design for negative moment (A-B section in x-direction)
Negative moment at the middle near the beam face.
 Mu =
78
(16−14)
= 39 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
 𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀𝑢
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
= 0.0125
 As = 𝜌 X bw X d = 0.0125 X 120 X 280= 420 mm
 Use 2𝝫20 (as top steel)
Negative moment at right edge
 Mu =
60
(18−16)
= 30 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
 𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀𝑢
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
= 0.00928
 As = 𝜌 X bw X d = 0.00928 X 120 X 280= 312 mm
 Use 2𝝫16 for both left and right edge (as top steel).
Foundation
Design of F1 for C1
 Pservice = 1200kN.
 Pultimate=1500kN.
 Bearing capacity= 250 kN/m2
 Area of footing =
𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦
=
1200
250
= 4.8 m2
 So we will use B= 2.2, L= 2.2
 Footing long side (l)=
𝐿−𝐿 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
2
=
2.2−0.4
2
=0.9m
Wide beam shear
 q Ultimate =
𝑃𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖
𝐵𝑋𝐿
=
1500
2.2𝑋2.2
=310kN
 Assuming effective depth (d) of 400mm
 𝝫VC = 0.75 ×
1
6
× 𝑓𝑐
′
𝑏𝑤𝑑 = 273.8 𝑘𝑁
 𝑉
𝑢 = 𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡. ×
𝑏𝑤
2
−
𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
2
−
𝑑
1000
 𝑉
𝑢 = 310 ×
2.2
2
−
0.4
2
−
400
1000
= 155 𝑘𝑁
 𝝫VC>𝑉
𝑢 , so d is accepted.
Check for punching shear
 VC in punching shear is: (𝝫=0.75)
 𝝫VC =
1
6
1 +
2
𝛽
𝑓𝑐
′
𝑏0𝑑 = 0.75 × 0.17 × 1 +
2
1
× 30 × 3200 ×
400
1000
= 2629𝑘𝑁
 𝑉
𝑢,𝑝 = Pultimate
– 𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡. × 0.4 + 𝑑 × 0.4 + 𝑑 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟
 𝑉
𝑢,𝑝 =1301.65 kN
 ∅𝑉𝐶,𝑝 = 2629.6 𝑘𝑁 > 𝑉
𝑢,𝑝 𝑖𝑡′
𝑠 𝑂. 𝐾 , 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ.
 Design for flexure
 M ultimate= 𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡 ×
𝑙𝑜
2
2
= 125.5 kN/m2
 Where 𝑙𝑜is length of cantilever in x or y direction
 𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
= 0.2108%
 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥. = 𝜌𝛷=0.9,∈𝑡=0.005 = 0.375𝛽1
0.85×𝑓𝑐
′
𝑓𝑦
, 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝛽1 = 0.85
 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥. = 0.0161 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥. > 𝜌
 As = 0.002108 X 1000 X 400=843.1 mm2
 Asmin. = 0.0018 X 1000 X 400=864 mm2
 Asmin>As
 So use As =Asmin=864mm2
footing
number
p
service
p
ultimate
footing
area
b l d As As,min
F1 1200 1500 4.8 2.2 2.2 400 843 864
F2 2860 3720 11.44 3.5 3.5 500 1862 1044
F3 4000 5227 16 4 4 600 2273 1224
F4 6200 8245 24.8 5 5 900 2507 1764
DESIGN OF MAT (1)IN BLOCK C
Mat 1 plan Mat 1 displacement
moment (m11) in x-axis
the maximum moment is 238kN.m. in x-axis
𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
= 0.1%
𝜌 < 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛
Use 𝜌 = 0.0018
As = 0.0018×1000×800=1440 mm/m
the maximum moment is 414 kN.m in y-axis
T hen calculate 𝜌 =
0.85 𝑓𝑐
𝑓𝑦
1 − 1 −
2𝑀
0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐
= 0.173%
𝜌 < 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛
Use 𝜌 = 0.0018
As = 0.0018×1000×800=1440 mm/m
For shrinkage steel As = 0.5×0.0018×1000×800 =720 mm/m (5 𝝫14 mm / m).
C2 C2
C1 C1
THANK YOU

More Related Content

Similar to presentation1_28.pptx

Design of Structures Chapter2.pptx
Design of Structures Chapter2.pptxDesign of Structures Chapter2.pptx
Design of Structures Chapter2.pptx
UmarSaba1
 
unit-3.ppt
unit-3.pptunit-3.ppt
unit-3.ppt
sabishanu
 
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGDESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
LiyaWilson4
 
Design of Structures Chapter2.pdf
Design of Structures Chapter2.pdfDesign of Structures Chapter2.pdf
Design of Structures Chapter2.pdf
UmarSaba1
 
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOFCASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOFRituraj Dhar
 
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureFire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Arshia Mousavi
 
Rectangular tank
Rectangular tankRectangular tank
Rectangular tank
JayswalShashank1
 
Ehv line design
Ehv line designEhv line design
Ehv line design
Demsew Mitiku
 
Integrated presentation pdf
Integrated presentation pdfIntegrated presentation pdf
Integrated presentation pdf
Nahom Balcha
 
Unit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdf
Unit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdfUnit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdf
Unit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdf
SathyaPrabha20
 
Design of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel Salame
Design of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel SalameDesign of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel Salame
Design of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel Salame
Loay Qabaha
 
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
ephrem53
 
CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)
CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)
CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)Cyle Teal
 
Design project
Design projectDesign project
Design project
Kabilan Kabi
 
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Humaayun Mohamed
 
Design of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingDesign of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footing
Arun Kurali
 
Isolated footing design
Isolated footing designIsolated footing design
Isolated footing design
srinu_anduri
 
SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,
SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,
SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,
Mohit Kumar
 
Design of a circular raft for a cylindrical core
Design of a circular raft for a cylindrical coreDesign of a circular raft for a cylindrical core
Design of a circular raft for a cylindrical core
Amin El Gendy, Ph.D., P.Eng, PMP
 

Similar to presentation1_28.pptx (20)

Design of Structures Chapter2.pptx
Design of Structures Chapter2.pptxDesign of Structures Chapter2.pptx
Design of Structures Chapter2.pptx
 
unit-3.ppt
unit-3.pptunit-3.ppt
unit-3.ppt
 
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGDESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
 
Design of Structures Chapter2.pdf
Design of Structures Chapter2.pdfDesign of Structures Chapter2.pdf
Design of Structures Chapter2.pdf
 
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOFCASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
CASE STUDY - STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR MODERN INSULATOR'S SHUTTLE KILN ROOF
 
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureFire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
 
Rectangular tank
Rectangular tankRectangular tank
Rectangular tank
 
Ehv line design
Ehv line designEhv line design
Ehv line design
 
Integrated presentation pdf
Integrated presentation pdfIntegrated presentation pdf
Integrated presentation pdf
 
Unit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdf
Unit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdfUnit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdf
Unit 5 Approximate method of analysis (1).pdf
 
Design of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel Salame
Design of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel SalameDesign of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel Salame
Design of concrete structure 2 project-Loay Qabaha &Basel Salame
 
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
140204-5-PTI EDC-130-Continuous Members-41.pdf
 
CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)
CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)
CIVE 801 - Course Project Report (Teal)
 
Design project
Design projectDesign project
Design project
 
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
 
Ch 8.pdf
Ch 8.pdfCh 8.pdf
Ch 8.pdf
 
Design of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingDesign of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footing
 
Isolated footing design
Isolated footing designIsolated footing design
Isolated footing design
 
SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,
SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,
SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT at AMERIGO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD,
 
Design of a circular raft for a cylindrical core
Design of a circular raft for a cylindrical coreDesign of a circular raft for a cylindrical core
Design of a circular raft for a cylindrical core
 

Recently uploaded

Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
timhan337
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
RaedMohamed3
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationA Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Peter Windle
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Vikramjit Singh
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
GeoBlogs
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Po-Chuan Chen
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Jheel Barad
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
 
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxPalestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationA Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
 

presentation1_28.pptx

  • 1. An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Terra Santa School Structural Design and Analysis Prepared By: Bara Shawahna Khaled Malhis Nadeem AL-Masri Supervised By : Dr. Mahmud Dwaikat
  • 2. OUTLINE  Introduction & general description of the project  3D modeling  Shear walls design  Design of columns  Design of beams  Slabs design  Foundation design
  • 3. INTRODUCTION  Our Graduation project is the design of a school in Jericho named as Terra Santa School. This school was designed by Al-Diyar Consultant and we will check on their design.  The school consists of three floors with total plan area of (3866.5m2).
  • 5.  SAP 2000 program will be used as main analysis tool.  ACI 318-08 for design.  Live loads are taken from ASCE 7 -05 code.  UBC 97 for seismic design. Methodology
  • 6. MATERIALS USED IN THE PROJECT:  Reinforced concrete  The unit weight of concrete (𝛾) = 25 kN/m3.  The required compressive strength after 28 days  For slabs & beams fc is 25 MPa.  For Columns ,shear walls & footing fc is 30 MPa.  The yield steel bars required Fy = 420 MPa.
  • 7. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS  For each block we chose the following floor system: 1. Block A ( one way ribs slab ) 2. Block B ( one way ribs slab ) 3. Block C ( two way ribs slab ) Blocks A & B. It’s very clear to see that block A , B has a uniform grid for columns with clear path of loading (one-way), therefore, we took the architectural layout for the columns. Ribbed slabs are known for their economic efficiency. The thickness calculation follows the ACI-318 code Block C. Block C has a different shape and dimensions and according to ACI – code requirements the slab should be designed as two-way ribbed slab for economic and deflection requirements. This is because the spans of each panel in Block C have approximately equal lengths.
  • 8.
  • 9. LOADS Dead load:  Own weight for one way slabs = 3.54 kN/m2 .  Own weight for two way slabs = 4.86 kN/m2 .  Super imposed load = 3 kN/m2 . Live load:  for all the class room = 2 KN/m2 .  for corridors = 5 KN/m2.
  • 10. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN AGAINST SEISMIC LOADS  We will design the seismic load by using SAP2000. Several methods is used in SAP for seismic which is:  Dynamic analysis: 1. Response spectrum. 2. Time history.  Equivalent static force Equivalent static method will be used for comparison [Block A only] and as a cross-check on the results of response spectrum analysis. Because response spectrum is more realistic and covers the modal shapes of the building, we will use it as a main tool for seismic design.
  • 11.  The seismic force effect on the structure can be translated to equivalent lateral force at the base of the structure and then this force will be distributed to the different stories and then to the vertical structural elements (frames and/ or shear walls).  This method is best applied to Regular Structure only.
  • 12. DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE BY EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE METHOD (STATIC METHOD) FOR BLOCK A  We will use the UBC97 method for analysis, because of available data and factors in our region.  The total design base shear in a given direction shall be determined from the following formula:  Where 𝑉 = 𝐶𝑣 𝐼 𝑅 𝑇 𝑤 1. Z= seismic zone factor. 2. I= importance factor. 3. R= Response Modification Factor 4. CV= velocity seismic coefficient. 5. W= the total dead load.
  • 13. SEISMIC ZONE FACTOR Z From this map the project in Jericho Z = 0.3
  • 14. CV AND CA TABLE Soil type D CV=0.54 Soil type D Ca=0.36
  • 16. RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR “R” TABLE The overall system is dual system R for building between (4.2-6) =5.6
  • 17. T CALCULATION  𝑇 = 𝐶𝑡(ℎ𝑛) 3 4  Hn= height of structure in meters = 15m  Ct = factor for this case =0.0488  T= is the basic natural period of a simple one degree of freedom system which is the time required to complete one whole cycle during dynamic loading.  And after calculation T=0.3719 sec, T from sap for block A =0.25 sec. Difference can be due to presence of shear walls that increase the stiffness of the building block.
  • 18.  Then calculate 𝑉 = 0.54𝑋1.25 5.5𝑋0.3719 × w = 0.33W  𝑉𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.11 𝑋 𝐶𝑎 𝑋 𝐼 𝑋 𝑊  Vmin. = 0.11X0.36 X1.25X w=0.0396W  Vmax= 2.5𝑋𝐶𝑎𝑋𝐼 𝑅 𝑊  0.2W  Vmax= 0.20 W use it because it Vcalculated>Vmax  For block A the weigh is = 12206 kN  V=0.20 X12206 =2441.2kN  From SAP Vtotal equivalent static force equal =2125kN.  From SAP Vtotal Response spectrum equal =1950kN.
  • 19. RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD  We use sap to design and analyze the project the design response spectrum is shown in
  • 20.  We find CA=0.36,CV=0.54 Then we have this curve
  • 21.  Then we should define a load cases in the X-direction, Y-direction, Z- direction  When we define X-direction for example:  We scale factor is for X direction = 𝑔𝐼 𝑅 = 9.81𝑋1.25 5.6 = 2.227  And 33% of it for to the other direction Y = 0.33X2.227=0.7329 ( as per UBC97 and ASCE requirements) .
  • 26. EQUILIBRIUM CHECK FOR BLOCK A  Dead load: 1. Slab dead load = area X slab own weight per square meter =1185.84 X 3.54=4136.4 kN 2. Shear wall load = walls volume X concrete weight per volume = 28.7 X0.3 X15 X 25=3288.75 kN 3. Columns dead load = column volume X concrete weight per volume = 30 X 15 X0.4 X 0.4 X 25=1800 kN 4. Beams dead load = beams volume X concrete weight per volume = 3691.4 kN 5. Total dead load = 12917.6 kN 6. Total dead load form SAP = 12956.699 7. % Error = 0.3% which is acceptable
  • 27.  Live load: Structure area X live load per square meter =1185.84 X 5 =5929.2 kN Live load from SAP = 5929.2 kN % Error = 0  Superimposed dead load: Structure area X superimposed load per square meter = 1185.84 X 4.5 = 5336.28 kN Superimposed load from SAP = 5336.2 kN % Error = 0
  • 28. MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM CHECK  We take block A as example to do this check. In this check we take the moment from 3D modeling and find the weight and then comparing it with the hand calculated weight  Moment resulted from dead load in block A in beam B1 is:
  • 29.  Calculating the moment = 39+44.75 2 + 28.9 = 70.775 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚  𝑤×𝑙2 8 = 𝑀 , 70.775×8 6.82 = 12.244 𝑘𝑁 𝑚  To convert it to kilo newton per square meter divide it over tributary area which equal 3 meter  W = 4.08 kN/m2  Calculated dead load = 3.54 kN/m2.  % of error = 4.08−3.54 3.54 × 100% = 15%  Check for sway and non-sway:  ∑𝑃𝑢 𝑋 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ∑𝑉𝑢 𝑋 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 < 0.05  361300 6068820 = 0.059  Its acceptable value.  non-sway
  • 30. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALLS  Design B2 in block B  axial force value Pu < 0.1 Ag fc  The maximum moment in the wall is 6824 kN.m  Assume singly reinforced section with reinforcement at d= 0.8h:  𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐  = 0.85×30 420 1 − 1 − 2×6824×106 0.85×0.9×300×45002×30 = 3 × 10−3  𝐴𝑆 = 0.003 × 1000 × 300 = 900 𝑚𝑚2 𝑚 5∅16/𝑚  𝑉 𝑐 = 1 6 × 𝑓𝑐 ′ × 𝑏𝑤 × 𝑑=0.1666𝑥 30𝑥300𝑥4500/1000 = 1233𝑘𝑁  Vu from sap =756 kN  𝑉 𝑛 = 𝑉𝑢 ∅ , 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ∅ = 0.75  𝑉 𝑛 = 756 0.75 = 1008 𝑘𝑁  𝑉 𝑐 > 𝑉 𝑛 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 =(1 ∅12/20𝑐𝑚)
  • 32. DESIGN OF THE COLUMNS AGAINST SEISMIC LOAD  Columns in Category C4(110X50)cm  We take the moment value from 3D –modal of 𝑀1 𝑀2 we have 𝑀1 𝑀2 = 312 298 = 1.04.   For the effective length factor (K) we take the building non sway so we take k from φmajor= φ a= 𝐸𝑐𝐼𝑐/𝑙𝑐 𝐸𝑏𝐼𝑏/𝑙𝑏 = 12.4 , φ b=50 and φ minor= 𝐸𝑐𝐼𝑐/𝑙𝑐 𝐸𝑏𝐼𝑏/𝑙𝑏 = 11.99 and φ b=50the which is between equal 0.98 take it 1.  𝐾𝐿 𝑅 = 34 − 12 𝑀1 𝑀2  Check slenderness limit 1𝑋3000 0.3 ℎ < 34 − 12 312 298  non-slender column  Using strength calculation, Pu<𝝫Pn for the same column, we got Ag = 5500000mm2. So the other dimension is5500000/500= 110mm. This dimension should be larger or equal the least dimension so let it equal 500mm, so we took it equal to 500 mm  The dimension of column 110X50 cm so Ag= 5500cm2  Strength calculations for this column are done as follows:
  • 33.  From SAP2000 and 3D-model we take Pu=8287 and it equal 𝝫Pn then we go to the interaction diagram and take the steel ratio value= 0.012  𝝫Pn/bh=15 =2.15 ksi  ¥=h-2couver/h = 0.9  Mu/bh2=1.44 = 0.2 ksi
  • 34. 𝑉 𝑐 = 1 6 × 𝑓𝑐 ′ × 𝑏𝑤 × 𝑑 =⇒ 𝑉 𝑐 = 1 6 × 30 × 1100 × 460/1000 = 461.9 𝑘𝑁 𝑉 𝑛 = 𝑉 𝑢 ∅ , 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ∅ = 0.75 𝑉 𝑛 = 88 0.75 = 117 𝑘𝑁 From SAP2000 the shear value on the column is equal 117 kN <463.9 it’s Ok Since the column is not subjected to shear, we use minimum steel for shear reinforcement so as to hold vertical bars and confine concrete. The stirrup spacing must be the minimum of the following •48 ds (diameter of stirrups)………..From code ACI 318-08 •16 db(diameter of bar) )………..From code ACI 318-08 •Least diminution of the section )………..From code ACI 318-08 •Not more than d/2……..From ACI 315-99 Therefore, use ᴓ10 •48 * 10 = 480 mm •16 * 20= 320 mm •500 mm •460/2= 230 mm Therefore use 4ᴓ10/150mm for stirrups along the column
  • 35. Column Dimension Main Steel Stirrups C1 40X40=1600 8ᴓ20 1ᴓ10/150mm C2 50X50=2500 12ᴓ18 3ᴓ10/150mm C3 85X50=4250 18ᴓ18 3ᴓ10/150mm C4 110X50=5500 28ᴓ18 4ᴓ10/150mm
  • 36. DESIGN OF BEAMS  Beam distribution and categories
  • 37.
  • 38. FOR BEAM B1 AT BLOCK A UNDER SEISMIC LOAD (50X35 CM)
  • 39.  𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 1.4 𝑓𝑦 , 0.25∗ 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 0.00333, 0.00297   𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.00333  For left span  Negative moment need 1284 mm2 (5𝝫20 mm).  For positive moment need 945 mm2 (4𝝫18 mm).   For the right span  Use (5𝝫20 mm) for top steel  And (4𝝫18 mm) for bottom steel
  • 41.  Near the column face  𝐴𝑣 𝑠 = 0.774  𝑠 = 157 0.774 = 200 𝑚𝑚  Use 1 𝝫 10 /100 mm  At the middle  𝐴𝑣 𝑠 = 0.292  S=500> S max  So use S max 230 mm  Use 1 𝝫 10 /150 mm  Right span  𝐴𝑣 𝑠 = 0.596  S= 263 mm > S max  Use 1 𝝫 10 /100mm
  • 42.
  • 43. SLAB DESIGN  The maximum span length is about 2.7m as shown in Block A,B Map, and therefore the thickness of the slab (assumed one-way ribbed) according to the table will be L /18.5 =15 cm and we used 20 cm for block A& B(S1).
  • 44.  The maximum span length is about 7.55m as shown in Block C Map, and therefore the thickness of the slab two-way ribbed according to the table will be Ln /30 =25.1 cm and we used 30 cm.
  • 45.  For Slab S1 at block A (20 cm):  Slab S1 is one way ribbed slab with 9 spans 2.7m for each.  Dead and super imposed load = 8.04 kN/m2  Live load= 5kN/m2 due to corridor live load.  All 𝜌 value is less than 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 so use 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 for design.  Asmin = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 X bw X d= 0.0033X120X180=72mm .Used 2ᶲ10.(As bottom steel
  • 46.  Top rib steel All 𝜌 value is less than 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 so use 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 for design.  Asmin = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 X bw X d= 0.0033X120X180=72mm .Used 2ᶲ10.  For Shrinkage net steel  Asmin = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 X b X d= 0.0018X1000X60=108mm2 Used 2ᶲ8
  • 47. DESIGN FOR TWO WAY RIBBED SLAB IN BLOCK C m11 (x-direction moment)
  • 48.  For left span the positive moment is  Mu = 86.4 (18.7−15.8) = 29.8 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚  𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀𝑢 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐 = 0.0092  As = 𝜌 X bw X d= 0.0092X120X280=310 mm  Use 2𝝫16  For right span the positive moment is  Mu = 30 16.5−15.5 = 30 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚  𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀𝑢 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐 = 0.00928  As = 𝜌 X bw X d= 0.00928 X 120 X280= 310 mm  Use 2∅16
  • 49.  Design for negative moment (A-B section in x-direction) Negative moment at the middle near the beam face.  Mu = 78 (16−14) = 39 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚  𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀𝑢 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐 = 0.0125  As = 𝜌 X bw X d = 0.0125 X 120 X 280= 420 mm  Use 2𝝫20 (as top steel) Negative moment at right edge  Mu = 60 (18−16) = 30 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚  𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀𝑢 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐 = 0.00928  As = 𝜌 X bw X d = 0.00928 X 120 X 280= 312 mm  Use 2𝝫16 for both left and right edge (as top steel).
  • 51. Design of F1 for C1  Pservice = 1200kN.  Pultimate=1500kN.  Bearing capacity= 250 kN/m2  Area of footing = 𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 = 1200 250 = 4.8 m2  So we will use B= 2.2, L= 2.2  Footing long side (l)= 𝐿−𝐿 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 2 = 2.2−0.4 2 =0.9m
  • 52. Wide beam shear  q Ultimate = 𝑃𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖 𝐵𝑋𝐿 = 1500 2.2𝑋2.2 =310kN  Assuming effective depth (d) of 400mm  𝝫VC = 0.75 × 1 6 × 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑤𝑑 = 273.8 𝑘𝑁  𝑉 𝑢 = 𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡. × 𝑏𝑤 2 − 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 2 − 𝑑 1000  𝑉 𝑢 = 310 × 2.2 2 − 0.4 2 − 400 1000 = 155 𝑘𝑁  𝝫VC>𝑉 𝑢 , so d is accepted. Check for punching shear  VC in punching shear is: (𝝫=0.75)  𝝫VC = 1 6 1 + 2 𝛽 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏0𝑑 = 0.75 × 0.17 × 1 + 2 1 × 30 × 3200 × 400 1000 = 2629𝑘𝑁  𝑉 𝑢,𝑝 = Pultimate – 𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡. × 0.4 + 𝑑 × 0.4 + 𝑑 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟  𝑉 𝑢,𝑝 =1301.65 kN  ∅𝑉𝐶,𝑝 = 2629.6 𝑘𝑁 > 𝑉 𝑢,𝑝 𝑖𝑡′ 𝑠 𝑂. 𝐾 , 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ.
  • 53.  Design for flexure  M ultimate= 𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡 × 𝑙𝑜 2 2 = 125.5 kN/m2  Where 𝑙𝑜is length of cantilever in x or y direction  𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐 = 0.2108%  𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥. = 𝜌𝛷=0.9,∈𝑡=0.005 = 0.375𝛽1 0.85×𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑓𝑦 , 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝛽1 = 0.85  𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥. = 0.0161 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥. > 𝜌  As = 0.002108 X 1000 X 400=843.1 mm2  Asmin. = 0.0018 X 1000 X 400=864 mm2  Asmin>As  So use As =Asmin=864mm2 footing number p service p ultimate footing area b l d As As,min F1 1200 1500 4.8 2.2 2.2 400 843 864 F2 2860 3720 11.44 3.5 3.5 500 1862 1044 F3 4000 5227 16 4 4 600 2273 1224 F4 6200 8245 24.8 5 5 900 2507 1764
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56. DESIGN OF MAT (1)IN BLOCK C Mat 1 plan Mat 1 displacement
  • 57. moment (m11) in x-axis
  • 58. the maximum moment is 238kN.m. in x-axis 𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐 = 0.1% 𝜌 < 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 Use 𝜌 = 0.0018 As = 0.0018×1000×800=1440 mm/m the maximum moment is 414 kN.m in y-axis T hen calculate 𝜌 = 0.85 𝑓𝑐 𝑓𝑦 1 − 1 − 2𝑀 0.85ᴓ𝑏𝑑2𝑓𝑐 = 0.173% 𝜌 < 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 Use 𝜌 = 0.0018 As = 0.0018×1000×800=1440 mm/m For shrinkage steel As = 0.5×0.0018×1000×800 =720 mm/m (5 𝝫14 mm / m).
  • 60.