12. the implementation.
MARCH
Training and Launch
FEBRUARY
Configuration
JANUARY
Developed Implementation Team/Kick Off
DECEMBER
Received Approval to Implement
13. the approach
Scholar Programs
⢠Full
implementation
⢠600 students
⢠Early March
Office of Advising
⢠Pilot subset
⢠~3000 students
(rising juniors)
⢠Mid March
14. the results ⢠50% of students in pilot
scheduled appointments
through AgileAdvisor
⢠79% attended
appointments scheduled
⢠# appointments
increased by about 30%
in first few months (when
compared to previous
yearâs period)
15. what happened next?
Peer
Advisors
Academic
Advisors
Office of
Advising
22+ advisors
14,000 students
Caseload: ~ 600
Scholar
Programs
2 advisors
600 students
Caseload: ~ 300
Pre-Professional
Advisors
Pre-Law
2 advisors
400 students
Pre-Health
4 advisors
1500 students
19. think big
when customizing the student interface.
⢠Branding
⢠Leverage free space
for additional details
⢠Generic appointment
types
20. think big
when customizing the student interface.
Why generic appointment types are helpful:
⢠Student centered:
Keeps front end simple
⢠Limits âincorrectâ
appointment requests
⢠Comparison Reporting
21. think big
when configuring
extra fields.
⢠Advisor facing side
⢠Custom dropdowns and
text fields by type NOT by
department
⢠Department specific values
22. think big
when crafting your
email notifications.
⢠A generic advisor
âdelegate accountâ
(ex: advisor@hunter.cuny.edu)
⢠Mention all locations
⢠Use advisor variables in
message
23. ⢠For branding: your college logo and Hobsons
⢠Staff permissions
⢠Customizable Text Updating
⢠Advising Center Settings
⢠Advising Center Email Settings
⢠Some negotiation skills
think big
27. ⢠Customer service skills
⢠Demo student record
⢠User guide
⢠pdf or web
⢠Screen casts or screenshots
⢠Suggestions: COMPASS
⢠Troubleshooting process
take care of your users
29. ⢠Implementation
worksheet and plan
⢠Same approach
1. Worksheet
2. Demo/discussion of
advising needs
3. Training
4. Launch
standardize
subsequent implementations.
31. ⢠Design implementation worksheet based on
institutional advising model
⢠Permission levels: Staff Group Management
⢠Shared workspace or drive
standardize