Oklahoma Brightspace Ignite Eval-Mentor
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•700 views
Presentation at 2014 Brightspace (by D2L) Ignite forum at Oklahoma City University. Oct 24, 2014. "Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace" by Stacy Southerland, Bucky Dodd and Tracy Fairless, all of the University of Central Oklahoma
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (19)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (10)
Similar to Oklahoma Brightspace Ignite Eval-Mentor
Similar to Oklahoma Brightspace Ignite Eval-Mentor (20)
More from D2L Barry
More from D2L Barry (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Oklahoma Brightspace Ignite Eval-Mentor
- 1. Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Stacy Southerland, Ph.D. Professor of Spanish Tracy Fairless, M.A. Assistant Director of Instructional Design Bucky Dodd, Ph.D. Director of eLearning and Innovations
- 2. Online Hybrid eLearning@UCO Self-Paced Online Interactive Video
- 3. QUAL ITY Instructional Design Facilitation Learning Context eLearning Design Principles Academic Departments Support Services
- 5. QUAL ITY PROCESS Colleges Select Faculty to Teach Online Faculty Complete Certification Course Support for Continuous Quality Colleges Select Courses for Delivery Course Development Peer Review & Authorization Course Scheduled Course Delivery eLearning Design Principles 5 Year Reauthorization Cycle
- 6. STRATEGIC QUAL ITY SYSTEMS 1. Facilitation Evaluation System 2. Faculty Mentor Program
- 7. Key Questions • Technology as Support Platform • Community Membership / Audience Diversity • Needs, Goals, and Performance Outcomes • Return on Investment
- 9. Resources • eLearning Facilitation Review Dashboard (D2L) – Preparing the Department – Before the Review – The Review – After the Review • Review Scorecard (Qualtrics) • Self-Assessment Instrument (Qualtrics)
- 11. Process What is Quality eLearning? • Best practices • UCOnline Quality • D2L • Types of online quality Preparing for the Review Process • Setting timelines • Using dashboard tools • Using Qualtrics Reviewing Online Facilitation • The review process • Examples • Completing the scorecard survey Consulting with Online Faculty • Coaching vs. Mentoring • Recommending support services • Developing an action plan
- 20. Coaching for Quality • Feedback • Goals • Professional Development
- 21. Lessons Learned • Work Load for Evaluation Process • Ownership of Evaluation Process • Focus on community “space” and dialogue
- 23. Assessing the Need For A Faculty Mentor Program
- 24. Customize and Implement a Faculty Mentor Program Develop a Program Model • Identify the value proposition • Identify the key stakeholders • Identify the project leaders • Identify a resource center
- 25. Resource Center Develop a Resource Center • Identify needed services • Collect and segment resources • Generate communication templates • Create a method to share information
- 26. Resour ce Center : Po i nt of Contac t Planning Considerations • Responsibilities • Challenges • Resources • Projected Outcomes
- 32. Re s our ce Center : Co l l aborat i v e Wor k shops Planning Considerations • Responsibilities • Challenges • Resources • Projected Outcomes
- 33. Resour ce Center : Gu i d ed Suppor t Planning Considerations • Responsibilities • Challenges • Resources • Projected Outcomes
- 40. STRATEGIC QUAL ITY SYSTEMS 1. Facilitation Evaluation System 2. Faculty Mentor Program
- 41. Lessons Learned • Terminology and naming of program • Fresh and dynamic information – Who uses the community dashboard? • Create need to use resource - motivation • Focus on community “space” and dialogue
- 42. Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Stacy Southerland, Ph.D. Professor of Spanish Tracy Fairless, M.A. Assistant Director of Instructional Design Bucky Dodd, Ph.D. Director of eLearning and Innovations
Editor's Notes
- Bucky
- Bucky
- Bucky
- Bucky
- Bucky
- Bucky
- Bucky
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Stacy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy Value Proposition – know the goals, the internal/external barriers and know the strengths/weakness Goal – to provide a consistent method of quality assurance and faculty support across all online courses. Barriers – range from a lack of awareness of the quality process, lack of time, misunderstandings, and issues of academic freedom. Strengths – each if not all, departments have several faculty that already provide tremendous peer leadership for online teaching; Weaknesses – repeating efforts, lack of authority, lack of time, & lack of compensation. Key stakeholder(s) will be able to help develop the value proposition. It will be what drives the project. Project leaders are those that stand out of the crowd. They teach online, develop online courses, have leadership skills, and have a passion to learn and make continued improvements. Resource Center – A mechanism to communicate information and resources is needed. This is the focus of my remaining time with you. We developed a resource center using Desire 2 Learn to serve as the hub for the Faculty Mentor Program.
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy
- Tracy / Stacy
- Tracy / Stacy
- Tracy / Stacy
- Tracy / Stacy
- Tracy / Stacy
- Tracy / Stacy
- Bucky
- Bucky
- Bucky