Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –2nd
June 2020
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometrical Features depend On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Many of the solar system geometrical features can be explained only by light
motion geometry…..Why?
- To answer this question I suggest the following concepts
(1st
Concept) The Matter Is Created By Light Motion Effect – that
means – the matter is a form of the light different forms – for example
i. In Young Experiment the light proceed a coherence and produces
bright fringes and darks fringes – i.e. – the bright and dark fringes is
the output where input is the run rays – that tells us there's some
change in light nature causes this change in the output
ii. In the double production experiment – the input is Gamma rays (1.2
Mev) and the output is electron and positron – the output is different
because some change is occurred for the light nature (may the change
here is to decrease the light velocity where the input is Gamma rays
travels by light velocity and the output is electron and positron which
can't travel with light velocity
iii. The Conclusion is that – The matter is created by light motion effect –
or as some change in the light nature
(2nd
Concept) The Space = Energy, that means the distance is created by
light motion
- Because of the previous 2 concepts the solar system geometrical features can be
explained only based on light motion geometrical rules
The paper tries to prove this fact

I do this research
2nd
2
1- Introduction
The idea is a simple and clear – let's summarize it in following:
- The Solar System Creation & Motion Data And Rules are originated from light
motion geometry – we can't understand the solar system data unless we use the
light motion geometry in this explanation – otherwise we can't reach to any logical
explanation… let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances in the solar system can't be explained unless we
suppose that the distance and its equal both are 2 beams of light one of them
is original and the other is its reflected light beam – otherwise we can't
explain why tenths of distances are equal to each other in the solar system
Tenths of other distances are rated to each other by the same one rate
(1.0725) and we can't find explanation for this phenomenon unless we
suppose that these distances are rated with (1.0725) because of Lorentz
length Contraction Phenomenon – one of the relativistic effects – which is
one of the light motion features
The solar system geometry also uses the distances values as time periods –
and this feature can't be explained unless we use the light motion features
where x=ct and if c=1 So d=t and by that the distance value can be used as a
time value which is a feature of the light motion features
The solar system has different rates of time – for example – one day on the
sun = 1 sidereal year on Earth – this rule can be produced only by light
motion – because the relativistic effects can create different rates of time
where this is one feature of light motion features
The proportionality between the matter and space – i.e. – the proportionality
between the planet diameter and its orbital distance – this proportionality
can be produced by light motion features and can't be produced by the rigid
body motion features
The Conclusion/ The Solar System Geometry Depend On Light Motion
Features
Paper Contents
2- The Distances Equality And Non –Equality
3- The Proportional Between The Matter And Space
4- The Distance Values using as Periods of Time
5- Are there different rates of time in the solar system?

I do this research
2nd
3
2- The Distances Equality And Non –Equality
Why These Distances Are Equal?
(1)
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
= Mars Orbital Circumference
= Pluto Neptune Distance
= Pluto eccentricity Distance
= Neptune Orbital Distance/π
= Uranus Orbital Distance /2
= Mercury Jupiter Distance x 2
(2)
Mercury Neptune Distance = Saturn Pluto Distance
Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Pluto Distance = Uranus Neptune Circumference
Earth Neptune Distance = Mercury Saturn Circumference (0.5%)
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Jupiter Saturn Circumference (1.5%)
(3)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = 2 Mercury Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Venus Distance = Venus Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Earth Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Mercury Distance = Mars Orbital Distance x π
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Venus Jupiter Circumference
Uranus Pluto Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x π
Pluto Orbital Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x 2π
Why These Distances Are Equal?
Because, these distances are created by light motions – the light beam is reflected and
by that – the original light beam (a distance) = the reflected light beam (another one)
It's the most near explanation to explain this huge number of the equal distances –
Because the previous distances are more than 50% of the solar system distances – and
it's illogical be have all these equal distances by pure coincidences
Also if the planets orbital distance depends on the masses gravity – these distances
equality forms a real puzzle because the planets masses show no similar equality!
(Please note – the planet orbital distance isn't defined based on the masses gravity
because Jupiter which is the greatest mass isn't the most near planet to the sun!)
So- Why These Distances Are Equal? –
Because –they are produced by light motions
2 light beams one is original and the other is its reflected light beam – both are equal
and has equal energy where distance = energy so the distance is equal

I do this research
2nd
4
Why These Distances Are NOT Equal?
1. 0725.1
mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon
mkm2.58MotionDailyEarth
=
2. 1.0725
km)(378500radiusEclipseSolarTotal
km)(406000radiusorbitalApogee
=
3. 0725.1
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
DistanceOrbitalJuppitermkm6.778
= (Error 0.7%)
4. 1.0725
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
=
5. 1.0725
DistanceEarthJupitermkm629
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
= (0.6%)
6. 1.0725
mkm)(1325.3DistanceVenusSarurn
mkm)(1433.5DistanceOrbitalSaturn
= (0.8%)
7. 1.0725
mkm)(1205.6DistanceMarsSarurn
mkm)(1284DistanceEarthSaturn
= (0.7%)
8. 1.0725
mkm)(2644DistanceMarsUranus
mkm)(2872.5DistanceOrbitalUranus
= (0.7%)
9. 1.0725
mkm)(4495.1DistanceOrbitalNeptune
mkm)(4894nceCircumfereOrbitalJupiter
= (1.5 %)
(10) The Planets Axial Tilts Also Use This Same Rate!
If the rate 1.0725 is produced by Lorentz length contraction effect – so the previous
data can be explained – Where the distances are equal (in previous point) because
these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams
And now
Why the distances are NOT equal?
Because these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams (as the
previous equal distances)
But
0725.1
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
===

I do this research
2nd
5
The reflected light beams pass through another frame – and because of that – these
distances specifically suffered from Lorentz length contraction effect and because of
that all these distances are contracted by the same rate 1.0725
Of course – we have to agree that "Space = Energy" – this concept is necessary for
the explanation – and we can imagine that – the light motion creates the distance –
that means – the light provides the required energy to create the required distance –
based on that we can accept that "Space = Energy".
Please see Equation No. 10
"Neptune Axial Tilt" is the parent of this equation – the value 28.3 is contracted by
the rate 1.0725 and produced 26.7 (Saturn axial tilt) which will be contracted also by
the same rate to produce 25.2 (Mars axial tilt) which will be contracted also to
produce 23.4 (Earth Axial Tilt) – the order also is logical because Neptune is the
energy source of the inner planets–this idea we discussed in (Jupiter Energy Analysis)
Deep Discussion
The paper objective is to explain how the data is created – in the previous 3 examples
– the data is puzzled – so the suggestion of the light motion behind the planet motion
is a very useful suggestion to explain how this data is created
In the paper we'll discuss many different data which can be explained only by the
hypothesis "The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion" –
Matter Origin and Creation
https://www.academia.edu/43214351/Matter_Origin_and_Creation
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43197587/Is_Saturn_The_Last_Planet_Created_In_The_Solar_S
ystem_II_

I do this research
2nd
6
3- The Proportional Between The Matter And Space
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc?
Because
(The sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (earth orbital distance/earth moon distance)
Why The Distances Rate = The Diameters Rate?
Just if we suppose that – the matter is created by light motion – and – distance is
energy and creation also by light motion – based on that – we will reach to one hand
behind both the diameters and distances
The eclipse phenomenon was the first question – because we didn't understand – how
the distances rate can be created equal to the diameters rate if both are created
independent from each other – on the contrary – they both created based on each other
– but how that can be possible – the light is the power can perform this task
There's one more notice we may refer to here:
- The Moon angular angle =0.5 degrees – that means – 2 sun rays touches the moon
both sides the angle between these 2 sun rays =0.5 degrees
- i.e.
- the moon diameter (3475 km) is equivalent to an angle =0.5 degrees
- What about the full 360 degrees
- 360 degrees (based on this same rate) should define 2.5 million km – but the moon
orbital circumference = 2.5 million km
- and that means
- the same angle define the moon angular diameter and its orbital circumference –
that's the same idea – the diameter and distance has the same rate – regardless by
what mechanism that's done – we know that's done by the light motion –
And based on that we can conclude that
- The solar system geometry depends on light motion features

I do this research
2nd
7
4- The Distance Values using as Periods of Time
Frequently we have seen that the distances values are used as periods of time
For example
(1)
- Mercury moves during its rotation period (58.66 solar days) a distance = 243 mkm
- Mars moves during the sun day period (116.7 solar days) a distance = 243 mkm
But
- 243 days = Venus Rotation Period
(2)
Table No.1 error
-1433.5 days x Mercury velocity daily 4.095 mkm = 5870 mkm Pluto Orbital Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Venus velocity daily 3.02 mkm = 4329 mkm Venus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Earth velocity daily 2.58 mkm = 3699 mkm Jupiter Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Mars velocity daily 2.082 mkm = 2984.5 mkm Uranus Pluto Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Jupiter velocity daily 1.1318 mkm = 1622.4 mkm Uranus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Saturn velocity daily 0.838 mkm = 1201 mkm Mars Saturn Distance 0.3%
-1433.5 days x Uranus velocity daily 0.5875 mkm = 842 mkm
-1433.5 days x Neptune velocity daily 0.4665 mkm = 670 mkm Venus Jupiter Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm = 582 mkm Mercury Earth distance*2Π 1%
We have discussed that before please review
The Time Definition
https://vixra.org/abs/1805.0523
also
Solar Group Geometrical Structure

I do this research
2nd
8
5- Are There Different Rates Of Time In The Solar System?
This idea we have discussed frequently – let's provide here 2 examples only
(1)
10921 km (Earth Circumference) x 86400 seconds ( a solar day) =940 mkm
(940 mkm = Earth orbital circumference)
This equation tells us that
If Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one solar day only – so the
Earth moon circumference will be = a distance of Earth Motion for 1 second only
This equation refers to that
One Solar Day On The Sun = One Sidereal Year On Earth
Is it proof? Not
But it's a reference that – the planet matter is created as a function of its motion and to
be in harmony with the other planets data and motions
(2)
10921 km (Earth Circumference) x 27.3 days =300000 km
The equation tells that
If the Earth Moon rotates around its axis one rotation per a solar day (as the Earth
does) so the moon will travel a distance = 300000 km during its orbital period (27.3
days)
Light travels per a second a distance = 300000 km
The value (1 second) is repeated with the moon circumference which may tell that
there's some mechanism behind created the moon circumference to be in harmony
with these equations!
(3)
Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.58 mkm = The Earth Moon
displacement total during a synodic month (29.53 days)
The distance is equal
That pushes me to suppose that 1 day on Earth =29.53 days on the Moon
Because the distance is equal
Now
We know that 1 day on the Sun = 365.25 days on Earth –
But 1 day on Earth = 29.53 days on the moon – so
1 day on the sun = 10747 days on the moon
But
10747 days = Saturn orbital period
Because the data is in harmony with each other I suppose these rates of time are found
Please review
Matter Origin and Creation (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43214392/Matter_Origin_and_Creation_II_

I do this research
2nd
9
References
Is There A Parallel Universe (I)
https://www.academia.edu/43150627/Is_There_A_Parallel_Universe
"Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?"
https://www.academia.edu/43133509/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43140027/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit-ii
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features

Similar to Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features