Is There A Parallel Universe

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Is There A Parallel Universe?
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –24th
May 2020
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
We see the planet moves and thinks that the planet moves by the masses gravity
forces – but in fact there's a light beam moves behind the planet and this light motion
causes the planet motion-
Think about the Water wheel deeply and carefully –The water wheel is formed in a
circle form has edges – and the water wheel is fixed by axis provides the chance for
the water wheel to rotate around its axis
Now
The water moves on the ground in one direction pushing the water wheel edges and
caused the water wheel to be rotated around its axis –
Here we have 2 motions
The water motion and the water wheel motion – both are in different directions – one
motion is continuous and directed in one direction (the water) and the other motion is
rotation motion around axis (the water wheel)
The water motion expresses the light motion and the water wheel motion expresses
The Planet Motion –
So We Have 2 Parallel Motions - That's Why We Have 2 Parallel Universes
But we realize that these 2 motions depend on the water motion (the light motion) –
that because the light motion is the distance creator and energy provider – where the
planet motion is a result of the light motion
The paper tries to prove this fact.

I do this research
2nd
2
1- Interlocution
How to prove that- the plant motion depends on light motion?
I will try to show that – The Planets Data Is Used By The Light Motion!
what does that mean?
the planet data is used by the light motion – because the planet motion depends on
light motion and that means the planets data is created by light motion but we see as
planet data – i.e. We See The Light Motion Results As Planets Data
Example No. 1
- Light with known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) travels during a solar day (86400
seconds) a distance =25920 mkm
Also
- The solar planets motions distances daily total = 17.75 mkm – means the
planets motions distances total can = 25920 mkm during a period 1461 days
(Earth Cycle 365+365+365+366) …But
- We know that 25920 years = The Precession Cycle
Why?
- The distance 25920 mkm (of light motion) is seen by us as 25920 years – Why?
Because x=ct and when c=1 means x=t means we see the distance value as a
period of time – so this is a light motion….
- The other explanation is "Pure Coincidences of numbers" ….!
Example No.2 Why These Distances Are Equal?
(1)
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
= Mars Orbital Circumference
= Pluto Neptune Distance
= Pluto eccentricity Distance
= Neptune Orbital Distance/π
= Uranus Orbital Distance /2
= Mercury Jupiter Distance x 2
(2)
Mercury Neptune Distance = Saturn Pluto Distance
Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Pluto Distance = Uranus Neptune Circumference
Earth Neptune Distance = Mercury Saturn Circumference (0.5%)
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Jupiter Saturn Circumference (1.5%)
(3)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = 2 Mercury Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Venus Distance = Venus Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Earth Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Mercury Distance = Mars Orbital Distance x π
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Venus Jupiter Circumference
Uranus Pluto Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x π
Pluto Orbital Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x 2π

I do this research
2nd
3
Why These Distances Are Equal?
Because, these distances are created by light motions – the light beam is reflected and
by that – the original light beam (a distance) = the reflected light beam (another one)
It's the most near explanation to explain this huge number of the equal distances –
Because the previous distances are more than 50% of the solar system distances – and
it's illogical be have all these equal distances by pure coincidences
Also if the planets orbital distance depends on the masses gravity – these distances
equality forms a real puzzle because the planets masses show no similar equality!
(Please note – the planet orbital distance isn't defined based on the masses gravity
because Jupiter which is the greatest mass isn't the most near planet to the sun!)
So- Why These Distances Are Equal? – because –they are produced by light motions
Example No.3 Why These Distances Are NOT Equal?
1. 0725.1
mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon
mkm2.58MotionDailyEarth
=
2. 1.0725
km)(378500radiusEclipseSolarTotal
km)(406000radiusorbitalApogee
=
3. 0725.1
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
DistanceOrbitalJuppitermkm6.778
= (Error 0.7%)
4. 1.0725
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
=
5. 1.0725
DistanceEarthJupitermkm629
= (0.6%)
6. 1.0725
mkm)(1325.3DistanceVenusSarurn
mkm)(1433.5DistanceOrbitalSaturn
= (0.8%)
7. 1.0725
mkm)(1205.6DistanceMarsSarurn
mkm)(1284DistanceEarthSaturn
= (0.7%)
8. 1.0725
mkm)(2644DistanceMarsUranus
mkm)(2872.5DistanceOrbitalUranus
= (0.7%)
9. 1.0725
mkm)(4495.1DistanceOrbitalNeptune
mkm)(4894nceCircumfereOrbitalJupiter
= (1.5 %)
(10) The Planets Axial Tilts Also Use This Same Rate!
0725.1
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
===

I do this research
2nd
4
If the rate 1.0725 is produced by Lorentz length contraction effect – so the previous
data can be explained – Where the distances are equal (in Example No. 2) because
these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams
And now
Why the distances in Example No. 3 are NOT equal?
Because these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams (as the
previous equal distances)
But
The reflected light beams pass through another frame – and because of that – these
distances specifically suffered from Lorentz length contraction effect and because of
that all these distances are contracted by the same rate 1.0725
So
The distance in Example No. 2 and No. 3 are similar to each other – but in example
no. 3 the reflected light beams (distances) pass through another frame which causes
all of them to be contracted by the same rate
Of course – we have to agree that "Space = Energy" – this concept is necessary for
the explanation – and we can imagine that – the light motion creates the distance –
that means – the light provides the required energy to create the required distance –
based on that we can accept that "Space = Energy".
Please see Equation No. 10
"Neptune Axial Tilt" is the parent of this equation – the value 28.3 is contracted by
the rate 1.0725 and produced 26.7 (Saturn axial tilt) which will be contracted also by
the same rate to produce 25.2 (Mars axial tilt) which will be contracted also to
produce 23.4 (Earth Axial Tilt) – the order also is logical because Neptune is the
energy source of the inner planets–this idea we discussed in (Jupiter Energy Analysis)
Deep Discussion
The paper objective is to explain how the data is created – in the previous 3 examples
– the data is puzzled – so the suggestion of the light motion behind the planet motion
is a very useful suggestion to explain how this data is created
In the paper we'll discuss many different data which can be explained only by the
hypothesis "The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion" –
Paper Content
2- The Planet Motion depends On Light Motion (The Proves Discussion)

I do this research
2nd
5
2- The Planet Motion depends On Light Motion (The Proves Discussion)
2-1 Preface
2-2 The Proves Discussion
2-1 Preface
The paper deals with parallel universes – as we have seen in the water wheel example
– we see the water wheel motion but we don't see the water motion – so these are 2
different universes – but both connected with each other by a geometrical mechanism,
That explains the geometrical rules which we have found in the solar system data.
The paper review the new vision about the solar system – which we have discussed
frequently before
The solar system isn't consisted of separated planets from each other – it's one
building or one body – each planet is a member in the same one body – or each planet
is a part of the same building –
As in the water wheel example – if we have ten water wheels – all of them are moving
by the same water motion- it's one machine – if the water stopped – no motion will be
found generally – as the blood moves through the creature body – all members live by
this same blood – it's the same – the solar system is one trajectory of energy and each
planet is a point on it – if the energy doesn't travel from point to another no planet will
be found neither move –WHY?
Because the planet matter is created on Energy (E=mc2
) and the planet distance is
created of energy because (Space = Energy) (a hypothesis) – and based on that the
solar system is one energy creates the planets matters and distances and causes their
motions-
Let's use some better example
The solar system is similar to the puppets theater – now there's one thread connect all
puppets on the stage – we see the puppets move different motions but we know the
mover is one – it's one thread behind all these puppets and they move by this one
thread –
That's why I try to prove here – because the solar system is one body that proves
there's a light motion behind the planet motion – as we have seen on the equal
distances example – the distances are equal because they are light beam and its
reflected light beam – but if the light and its reflected one are found together in the
same system that means this system is one machine or one building because each part
of it is created based on the other parts…
Let's summarize this preface idea
- The Solar System Is One body each planet is a member in this same body
- The solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages
- The planets move one unified motion because this unified motion depends on a
light beam motion behind –
A Conclusion

I do this research
2nd
6
2-2 The Proves Discussion
The Proving Concept
In this sub-point I provide planets data which is used by the light beam –
As in the water wheel example
The water move on the ground in one direction but the water wheel motion causes to
raise this water and changes its motion direction –
I want to say that
The planets data is used by the light motion in some different way – that means – the
same data which is registered as a planet data – this same data is used by the light
motion for some different purpose completely – as we have seen in example no. 1
where the light travels 25920 mkm during a solar day – we consider the value 25920
years as The Precession Cycle – these 2 values are just one – it's one motion done by
the light and we see the result as a planet data – so we know this value 25920 years as
the Precession Cycle (which is the Earth Axis Cycle) – we see the result of the light
motion –
We live in the Cave of Plato – the light motion is the creator of the distance but we
don’t see the distance creation- because we can't observe the light motion
So …I can't depend on the observation to prove my claim
I depend on the planets data analysis to prove my claim – so – I wish some one will
accept the explanation of the value 25920 – because the light travels during a solar
day (86400 seconds) a distance =25920 mkm – now this number 25920 is specific
because the used period of time is 1 solar day – that means – the light uses a unit and
not part of a unit – because the solar day is produced by Earth rotation around its axis
– by that – the solar day is a geometrical player in the solar system geometry and
where the light uses this unit of time – that means – the produced value 25920 mkm
should be a unit also – that's why this value is specific one – and because of that I
couldn't consider both values 25920 mkm and 25920 years are found by pure
coincidences –
And because of that I claimed there's a geometrical reason behind and I have searched
and found that – this value 25920 mkm is produced by light motion but we see it as
25920 years –basically because (x=ct and when c=1 so x=t) – I try to show that there's
a light motion we don't consider behind the planet motion.
Note Please
The solar planets motions distances total per a solar day =17.75 mkm –and that means
– the planets motions distances total can pass the distance 25920 mkm in a period
=1461 days
And because this period 1461 days is the Earth Cycle (365+365+365+366) that tells
us there's some geometrical mechanism here which transports the same value (25920)
from one point to another –
This proves the paper argument that–A Planet Motion Depends On A Light Motion
In this point we discuss some data which can show light motions found behind the
planets motions – that means – this data can be explained only based on this
hypothesis "A Planet Motion Depends On A Light Motion"

I do this research
2nd
7
I- Data
(1)
4222.6 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)
(2)
5040 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 5848 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance)
(3)
The Rate 99%
(4)
Jupiter Energy Analysis
(5)
The inner planets motions network
(6)
The Earth Moon Orbit
II- Discussion
Equation No. (1)
4222.6 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)
I suppose there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
Now this light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) travels a distance = 4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital
circumference during a period =4222.6 seconds
This is the information based on which I claim there's a light beam accompanying
with the planet motion –
But is it true information? Let's see more data
- 4222.6 hours = Mercury Day Period
- Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 h) a distance =720.7 mkm=
Mercury Jupiter Distance
- Also the distance 778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1.0725 x 720.7 mkm
(Mercury Jupiter Distance) - and we agreed that the rate 1.0725 is Lorentz
length Contraction rate – that means the value 778.6 mkm and 720.7 mkm are
one value but the difference is found by the length contraction effect
- The value 4222.6 s still works strongly – for example 4222.6 mkm = 2π x670
mkm (where 670 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance) – and we know that – 680
mkm = Venus orbital circumference – means – Venus moves during its orbital
period a distance = Venus Jupiter Distance (error 1.4%) and this behavior is
similar o Mercury behavior
- (5040/4222.6) = 928 mkm/ 778.6 mkm – where 928 mkm = Earth Jupiter
distance when they be at 2 different sides from the sun – where mercury day
needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days –

I do this research
2nd
8
Are these data prove the idea?
All what we have is a light beam (with supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) – travels
during 4222.6 seconds – so this number 4222.6 second controls Mercury, Venus and
Earth Motions – can that be proof for the claim "A light motion is accompanying
with the planet motion" or "The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
We try to explain how the data is created
Mercury, Venus and Earth behave very similar to each other – so if the connection
between them is this light beam motion –may it be logical- but is it a sufficient proof?
Equation No. (2)
5040 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 5848 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance)
Mercury needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days
Light with supposed velocity (1.16mkm/sec) travels during 5040 seconds a distance
= 5848mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance)
But
Mercury during 346.6 (The Nodal Year) moves a distance = 1433.5 mkm (Saturn
Orbital Distance)
Now if this distance 1433.5 mkm is used as a period of time 1433.5 days
So
Mercury moves during this period (1433.5 days) a distance = 5848 mkm (= Mercury
Pluto Distance)
Based on that I have concluded my theory – Mercury moves following the light
motion – or – The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion -
Again – We have no empirical proves for that nor a geometrical mechanism to explain
how the planet motion follows the light motion
We just have the data among the planet data – so the previous explanation argument
depends on the number 5040 seconds which creates the question why Mercury day
period needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days
I try to show that – the planets data which we know perfectly – this same data is used
by the light motion for different purpose – It's A Parallel Universe
Now – the light velocity 1.16 mkm/sec- there's no proof that there's a light beam has
its velocity! So the data explanation depends on unproved argument-
But
Both data uses the same velocity 1.16 mkm/sec – and in Jupiter Energy we will see
that the velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is the basic column of Jupiter Energy Data – the
repeated using of the same value 1.16 mkm/sec is a proof that this value is found in
the solar system geometry basics
Note Please
The using of the distance value as a period of time proves, we deal with a light motion

I do this research
2nd
9
Data No. (3)
The Rate 99%
Additional Data
(A)
17.4 degrees (inner planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degrees (Pluto
orbital inclination)
(B)
23.6 degrees (outer planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degrees (Earth
Axial Tilt)
(C)
(180 degrees /π) x 0.99 = 28.3 degrees (Neptune Axial Tilt)
(D)
Earth Moon Distance At Perigee 0.363 mkm = 0.99 x0.366 mkm (Outer Planets
Diameters Total)
(E)
Mercury during 5040 seconds moves a distance = 0.99 x 2 Saturn Diameters
(but Mars during 5040 second move a distance = Saturn Diameter)
Discussion
The previous data is an example of many similar in which the rate 0.99 is used
frequently as a rate – i.e. this rate is used frequently in the solar system – I suppose
there's a geometrical reason behind this frequent using – so let's ask why 0.99 is used
sop frequently – let's Einstein answered us
Book / Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Einstein book)
Section 13 (in Fizu experiment which is repeated frequently by others)
"According to recent and most excellent measurements by Zeeman, the influence of
the velocity of flow v on the propagation of light is represented by formula(B)(x'=wt')
to within one percent (1%)
So, the rate 0.99 may refer to another feature of the light motion effect on the solar
system data – that may supports the paper argument that

I do this research
2nd
10
Data No. (4)
1 Preface
2 Jupiter Energy Analysis (Part I)
3 Jupiter Energy Analysis (Part II)
1 Preface
Let's summarize the idea directly in following… We know that
o Mercury Orbital Circumference = 360 mkm
o Venus Orbital Circumference = 680 mkm
o Earth Orbital Circumference = 940 mkm
o Mars Orbital Circumference =1433 mkm
o Jupiter Orbital Circumference =4900 mkm
o Saturn Orbital Circumference =9010 mkm
o Uranus Orbital Circumference =18055 mkm
o Neptune Orbital Circumference =28255 mkm
o Pluto Orbital Circumference =37100mkm
- The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total = (360 mkm+ 680 mkm+ 940
mkm +1433.5 mkm +4900 mkm+ 9010 mkm +18055 mkm +28255 mkm
+37100 mkm)= 100733.5 mkm
- And 100733.5 mkm x 2 = 201467 mkm
- Now The Value 201467 mkm is used frequently and repeated in Jupiter
Data…! Why? ………Let's use example
Example No. 3
(Jupiter Circumference 449378.3 km)2
= 201467 mkm (error 0.2%)
The Data Direction
- Why do any data provide a specific value? How the data is created and based
on what geometrical players? We simply don't know how the planets data is
created? why Jupiter diameter =142984 km and not 135000 km? many similar
questions we can't answer – so what can we do?
- We can conclude The Data Direction – for example – when we have one
specific number as this one (201467 mkm) and this number is used frequently
we may conclude that there's a geometrical reason behind this number using –
we don't know the geometrical mechanism by which this number is used – but
we know that this value is available with Jupiter (as we will see in following) –
so we will consider this value is created based on geometrical reason and not by
pure coincidences –it's A Direction Of Data –
But why not "pure coincidence?" because
- Because the pure coincidence concept depends on the random choice and we
have no random choice – on the contrary – we have a specific value connected
with Jupiter data (specific data) – it's a direction of data – and can't be created
by any pure coincidence – let's start out discussion immediately

I do this research
2nd
11
2 Jupiter Energy Analysis (Part I)
I-Data
Equation no. (1)
201467 mkm = 2 x The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total 100733.5 mkm
Equation no. (2)
201467 mkm = (Pluto Orbital Circumference – Jupiter orbital circumference) x 2π
Equation no. (3)
201467 mkm = 28255 mkm + 2 x 86400 mkm
Equation no. (4)
201467 mkm = 2 x 86400 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec
Equation no. (5)
201467 mkm = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) x 41
Equation no. (6)
201467 mkm = (Jupiter Circumference 449378.3 km)2
Equation no. (7)
201467 mkm = Jupiter Diameter x The Sun Diameter
II-Discussion
Equation no. (1)
201467 mkm = 2 x The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total 100733.5 mkm
Equation No. 1 tells us about the value we deal with – this value = the double value of
all planets orbital circumferences total – so this value is specific one
Equation no. (2) & Equation no. (3)
These 2 equations we discuss deeply in (2-3 Jupiter Energy Analysis (Part II))
Simply
The distance between Jupiter and Pluto is divided based on these equations (No. 2 and
No. 3) –
That means – this distance is divided by geometrical rates to perform specific values
for specific equations …. How to explain that?
Imagine you have some open area and you brought partitions to create rooms and
offices for your employees – by that – the open area is divided into geometrical rates
to each other and because of that you can find these geometrical rates repeated in
using and you can see also the geometrical rules based on which these rates were
created –
Similar to that
The distance from Jupiter to Pluto is divided geometrically – please review the next
point (2-3 Jupiter Energy Analysis (Part II) it provide the full details

I do this research
2nd
12
Equation no. (4)
201467 mkm = 2 x 86400 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec
Equation no. 4 tells us
If
There's a light beam it's velocity =1.16 million km
So
This light beam will pass this distance (201467 mkm) in 2 solar days period (86400 s)
Why this is specific data?
Because the velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is seen frequently in the solar system data – and
we should see it in point no. (2-4 Jupiter effect on the inner planets)
Because of that – the value 201467 mkm – finds more specific consideration
First because – this value is used repeatedly and we have no explanation why?
Second because – we have discussed the claim that – there's a light motion is found
behind the planet motion – and if this light beam is found – that will support this same
claim –
Any way the data is specific
Note Please
How to know that if the data is specific?
Because the light travels for 2 (complete) solar days – it's specific value –because it's
not a part of the day … we have seen before that –the light motion uses the solar day
as a unit … let's remember …
- A light beam with known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) travels during one solar day
(86400 seconds) a distance = 25920 mkm
But
- All planets motions distance can cover this same distance (2590 mkm) in a
period = 1461 days where the planets motions distances total per a solar day
=17.75 million km
i.e.
- The same distance is passed 2 times – by light (in 1 solar day) and – by the
planets (in 1461 solar days) - one distance and 2 rates of time
But
- 25920 mkm we see as 25920 years (the Precession Cycle) – because it's a light
motion – where x =ct and when c =1 so x=t
- The previous data tells that the light deals with the solar day period as a unit
and so if the supposed light velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) uses 2 solar days – that
may be understood in the same geometrical context
- i.e. the value 201467 mkm is very specific one.

I do this research
2nd
13
Equation no. (5)
201467 mkm = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) x 41
41 degrees = The Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
Equation No. 5 shows that –
The Value (201467 mkm) deals with The Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
Once again we have some proof that Jupiter data deals with planets data summation!
we may remember
(Jupiter diameter = 8 planets diameters + Earth moon diameter)
The value 41 w have seen before – let's remember here
Jupiter diameter / Earth moon diameter = 41
We have seen this equation in the previous paper directly
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43020209/Can_Jupiter_effect_on_the_Earth_Moon_II_
and in that discussion we concluded that the value 41 also = the plants orbital
inclinations total and that shows the great effect of Jupiter on the solar system
but this equation also shows that the Earth moon acquired this ability because of the
moon relationship with Jupiter – and because of that – the Earth moon itself can effect
on the solar planets data summation! Which may help to explain the data
- Earth Moon Distance (perigee radius) = the outer planets diameters total (%1)
- Earth Moon Distance (apogee radius) = the solar planets diameters total
- The distance between perigee and apogees = the inner planets diameters total =
Earth Circumference
The planets data shows that we deal with some geometrical system and because of
that the rules are repeated
As Jupiter diameter =8 planets diameters total + the moon diameter
Also
Earth Circumference = the (5) inner planets diameters total
Also
2 Neptune Circumference = the other outer planets diameters total
There's a geometrical mechanism behind created these results!

I do this research
2nd
14
Equation no. (6)
201467 mkm = (Jupiter Circumference 449378.3 km)2
Equation no. (7)
201467 mkm = Jupiter Diameter x The Sun Diameter
These 2 equations almost one Equation – because
Jupiter Diameter x π2
= the sun diameter (error 1.5%)
The data tells that – there's no pure coincidence here – we deal with geometrical
building which uses the same rules frequently…
So if there's some relationship between The sun and Jupiter diameters – this
relationship isn't created by any random choice or pure coincidence – on the contrary
– this relationship is shown strongly in different data
Not only in the diameters but also in the orbital circumference…
Again – it’s a geometrical system uses the same rules frequently
Because of that
(Uranus Diameter)2
= Mars Uranus Distance
Because
As we have discussed before
There's a relationship between the planet diameter and orbital distance – that may
explain the previous data
A COMMENT
The main point in this paper is the value (201467 mkm)
- We have a reason to ask why this value is used frequently with Jupiter data in
different forms
Because
- We have no geometrical mechanism – means – we don't know how this value
(201467 mkm) is created – we see it used frequently but no geometrical
mechanism we catch – so – I try to show that – there's A Direction Of Data the
value 201467 mkm is used with Jupiter data frequently because Jupiter is the
solar system Parent and based on Jupiter Energy the solar planets creates their
The following point can help our investigation greatly

I do this research
2nd
15
3 Jupiter Energy Analysis (Part II)
Please Note
(The values 201466 mkm – 200448 mkm and 2020584 mkm – have difference
around 1% only – means all calculations error can't be more than 1%)
The Main Idea
(1)
Jupiter sends the energy to Pluto – Jupiter energy is sent in a light beam form, where
this light beam velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – Jupiter continued sending its energy for 2
full solar days (2 x 86400 seconds)
(2)
This light beam passes during the period =1.16 mkm/s x 2 x 86400 s =202584 mkm
So
During 2 solar days, light with velocity 1.16 mkm/s passes a distance = 202584 mkm
(3)
This Energy reach to Pluto – but Pluto reflected this full energy again to Neptune –
That means Pluto didn't use any of this energy but Pluto reflected it to Neptune.
(4)
Neptune – in that time – had no an orbital circumference – for that reason – Neptune
used part of the sending energy to build its orbital circumference (28255 mkm)
Specifically Neptune used 14% of the total energy to build its orbital circumference
(3)
After Neptune Orbital Circumference Building
The rest of energy = 86% (= 2x 86400 mkm) ,
this energy Neptune reflected to the inner planets –into 2 equal trajectories of Energy,
Each Trajectory contains an energy =43% of the total =86400 mkm
(4)
Neptune reflected the first Trajectory of energy contains (86400 mkm) to Venus and
Earth together (to be used by Venus & Earth)
(5)
Also Neptune reflected the second Trajectory of energy contains (86400 mkm) to
Jupiter and then to Mercury (Jupiter doesn't use any of the energy – Jupiter directed
the energy only toward Mercury to reach Mercury = 86400 mkm completely)
(6)
How we know this story and the values?! Because Distance = Energy
(7)
So all distances I have referred are real distances – and that means – these real
distances are created based on the previous story which force us to conclude that a
light velocity 1.16 mkm/sec must be found in the solar system
(8) The distances values analysis force us to accept that a velocity of 1.16 mkm/sec must be
found behind these distances creation –let's analyze and discuss that deeply as possible in
following:

I do this research
2nd
16
(Equation No. a)
(Pluto Orbital Circumference-Jupiter Orbital Circumference) x2π=202584mkm
1.16 mkm/sec x 2 x 86400 seconds =202584mkm
(Equation No. b)
202584 mkm =
28255 mkm (Neptune Orbital Circumference) +
2 x 86400 mkm
(Equation No. c)
(Neptune orbital Circumference –Earth orbital Circumference) x π= 86400 mkm
(Error less 1%)
Discussion
Equation No. a
(Pluto Orbital Circumference -Jupiter Orbital Circumference)x2π=202584mkm
Jupiter & Pluto Orbital Circumferences Difference x 2π = 202584 mkm
Also
Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/s during 2 solar days passes a distance = 202584mkm
Equation No. b
This equation tells a simple information – from a distance =202584mkm we minus
Neptune orbital circumference (28255 mkm)- The rest of energy = 2 x 86400 mkm
Equation No. c
This equation tells that the value 86400 mkm reach to Earth (or Venus)!
First, Why this prove any thing??
Because we use the same equation!!
The difference between Neptune & Earth Circumferences x π=86400 mkm
This is the same equation by which the energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – it's NOT
similarity for some numbers – it's the same motion of energy- so the same equation
and the same amount of energy are used
Second, to where the energy is sent, because if we use Neptune Earth circumferences
difference or Neptune Venus circumferences difference – the error will be less 1%
give no direction to the energy transportation– so the 1st
trajectory energy is sent to
Earth or Venus?!
To both together – the energy is reach to a point 120 mkm from the sun and from
this point the energy (86400 mkm) is divided for 2 Planets (Earth and Venus)
Third,
The difference between (Neptune & Mercury) orbital circumferences x π = 86400mk
(error 1.5%)
So – why this energy must be passed through Jupiter – why not directly to Mercury?
Because Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm and
720.7 mkm x 2π = 4495.1 mkm (Neptune orbital distance)- later we'll discuss it.

I do this research
2nd
17
More Deep Discussion
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
(1)
Why does the previous data prove the story?
Shortly
The value 202584mkm is used 3 times in the previous data
(1) As the result of Jupiter Pluto Circumferences Difference x 2π
(2) As a distance passed by light with velocity 1.16 mkm/s during 2 days
(3) As the total =28255 mkm +2 x 86400 mkm
Where (28255 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference) and (86400 mkm =Neptune –
Earth orbital circumferences difference x π) where we can use Venus or Mercury in
place of Earth and reach to the same result
The 3 times of using the value 202584mkm have no clear explanation – just what I
provided here in this paper.
(2)
How to prove the energy is transported really?
Let's remember – we accepted that – Distance = Energy …Now
The inner planets creation energies are sent from Jupiter and reflected by Neptune
What conclusion we can reach here?
Jupiter & Neptune orbital distances control the inner planets data Is It True??
More Data
Group No. (I)
Neptune Orbital Distance 4495.1mkm =
= Earth Venus distance 41.4 x Venus orbital distance 108.2
= Mercury Orbital Distance 57.9 x Earth Mars distance 78.3
= Mercury venues distance 50.3 x Mercury Earth distance 91.7 (error 2.5%)
Simply the inner planets define their distances with a limit which is Neptune orbital
distance- Why? because Neptune reflected their energy
Group No. (II)
Jupiter Orbital Circumference
360 mkm (Mercury Orbital Circumference) + 680 mkm (Venus Orbital
Circumference) +940 mkm (Earth Orbital Circumference) + 1433.5 mkm (Mars
Orbital Circumference) x 2 = 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference) (error 1%)
Shortly
the inner planets orbital circumferences total = Jupiter orbital circumference! Why?
because Jupiter energy is their creation source – the inner planets are created because
of Jupiter energy - and Energy = Distance – that explains the data clearly-
Note Please
For a geometrical necessity Mars Orbital Circumference is used 2 times in the
previous summation (Later we'll have more deep discussion).

I do this research
2nd
18
Group No. (III)
Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Mercury Orbital Distance x 2 = Mercury Jupiter Distance
- Venus Orbital Distance =Venus Jupiter Distance (Error 1.5%)
- Earth Orbital Distance =Earth Jupiter Distance (Error 1.3%)
Note Please
(1)
When Earth and Jupiter are at 2 sides from the sun so 930 mkm =778.6mkm+ 149.6
mkm – so Earth Jupiter distance(in this case) = Earth orbital circumference (940 mk)
(2)
The previous data needs more deep discussion – we should realize that Jupiter is the
inner planets store of Energy and Neptune reflected this energy to them – simply the
inner planets live on this energy – and that creates a very great effect of Jupiter and
Neptune on the inner planets
The previous data (which is so much data) is a very small part of a sea of data proving
this fact –we need to discuss each relationship alone to see clear as possible
For example
Mercury moves during its day period (around 176 solar days) a distance = Mercury
Jupiter Distance! Why? it’s Jupiter effect on Mercury motion – which we need to
discuss later
Mercury orbital inclination, orbital period and a great part of Mercury orbital motion
depends directly on Jupiter data
The previous data I inserted to work as a proof for the argument – but the real
relationships are so deep in the solar system geometrical structure and we should
discuss them as deep as we can in this paper.
Group No. (IV)
1. 0725.1
DistanceOrbitalJuppitermkm6.778
= (0.7%)
2. 1.0725
= (No Error)
3. 1.0725
DistanceEarthJupitermkm629
= (0.6%)

I do this research
2nd
19
Data (5)
The Inner Planets Motions Network
Additional Data
1. Mercury is created by a period of time =50 seconds
2. Light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec travels for 50 seconds and perform a
distance =58 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance
3. Mercury orbital circumference (58 x 2π =360 mkm)
- 360 mkm because of high velocity motion – is used as 360 seconds
4. Light beam with velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) during 360 seconds travels a distance =
=108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
5. 216.4 mkm (Venus orbital diameter) is a distance passed by light beam its velocity
0.3mkm/sec during a period =720 seconds
6. 720 seconds (because of high velocity motion) is used as a distance =720 mkm =
Mercury Jupiter distance –
7. Mercury Jupiter diameter (720 mkm x 2) needs a period = 720 seconds x 2 which
needs a distance = 216.4 x 2 mkm
8. (the distance 216.4 mkm x 2) will be used as a time period in the following
equation 216.4x 2 x 1.16 = 500 mkm
9. 500 mkm is used as a time period = 500 seconds
10.Light beam (0.3 mkm/sec) needs 500 seconds to pass Earth orbital distance (149.6
mkm)
11.Still the distance 720 mkm is produced by a light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during a
period = 627 seconds
12.Light its velocity (0.3mkm/sec) needs 2090 seconds to pass 627 mkm where 2090
seconds is used as distance 2090 mkm = Jupiter Uranus Distance
13.But 6939.75 seconds x 0.3mkm/sec = 2090 mkm – means light with c velocity
travels during (6939.75 seconds) a distance = Jupiter Uranus Distance (6939.75
days =Metonic Cycle).
14.108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance – So Venus Orbital Circumference =680
mkm but Venus Jupiter distance = 670.4 mkm (Venus & Jupiter positions are
defined before by their distances to Mercury and Earth – that means – the distance
670.4 mkm we didn't bring it from the planets data sheet but we define it relative
to Earth & Mercury positions to Jupiter - i.e. 670.4 mkm is not a new data but a
concluded data)
15.light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm passes during 670.4 seconds a distance =778.6
mkm (Jupiter orbital distance)

I do this research
2nd
20
16.Also 670.4 mkm x 2π = 4224 mkm (high velocity motion uses this value as time)
17.Light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm travels during 4224 seconds a distance =4900
mkm = Jupiter orbital distance
18.Note Please (Mercury Day =4224 hours approximately- means the light motion
period is transferred to Mercury motion but the rate of time is changed from 1
second to 1 hour- that's similar to Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days which we have
seen before where the 6939.75 seconds in transferred into the moon motion in
form 6939.75 days)
19.Light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm travels during 4900 seconds a distance
=5678.1 mkm = Mars Pluto Distance (6585.39 mkm= 1.16x 5678.1mkm) (where
6585.39 days = Saros Cycle)
20.670.4 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance) = 1.0725 x 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter distance)
21.Earth orbital circumference =940 mkm – which is used as 940 seconds
22.A Light beam (0.3mkm/sec) during 940 seconds passes a distance 282 mkm
23.A light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during 282 seconds passes 327.6 mkm (which we
see as lunar sidereal year 327.6 days)
24.Light beam (0.3 mkm) during 327.6 seconds pass distance =98.7 mkm (Uranus
axial tilt =97.8 degrees)
25.Light beam (1.16 mkm) during 97.8 seconds pass distance =113.45 mkm (where
1mkm=1deg means 113.45 mkm = 113.45 deg = 90 +23.45 deg. Earth axial tilt)
26.149.6 mkm x 2 (Earth orbital diameter) is used as time value – so light with
velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) during this period 149.6 sec x 2 a distance =346.6mkm
where 346.6 days – the nodal year.
27.3717 mkm (Jupiter Neptune Distance) us used as time so –light with velocity
0.3mkm/sec travels during 3717 seconds a distance = Jupiter Mars distance (1.2%)
28.5127 mkm (Pluto Jupiter distance) is used as 5127 seconds where a light with
velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels during 5127 s a distance = Pluto orbital distance.
But why Mars is exceptional always?!
29.655 mkm (Jupiter Saturn distance) (655 mkm will be used as 655 sec) x 1.16
mkm/sec = 760 mkm (will be used as 760 seconds)
- Light beam (0.3mkm/sec) travels during 760 seconds a distance = 227.9 mkm =
Mars orbital distance

I do this research
2nd
21
Discussion
Simply the distances between the 3 inner planets and Jupiter depends on light motions
clearly where no data is inserted from out – it's just the three planets data and Jupiter –
that's what I try to prove
The light uses the planets data in different form and for different purpose – because of
that the previous network is found – it's one building established depending on each
other – no outer data is used – the used is just the inner 3 planets data and Jupiter
Just in Mars case – Saturn data is used – we know why – but we may review Jupiter
effect on the inner planets in following…
Jupiter & The Inner Planets Relationships
More Data
- Mercury Jupiter Distance = 2 x Mercury Orbital Circumferences
- Venus Jupiter Distance = Venus Orbital Circumferences (Error 1%)
- Earth Jupiter Distance = Earth Orbital Circumferences (Error 1%)
(Note please Earth and Jupiter be on different sides from the sun – in this case the
distance between Jupiter and Earth will be =778.6 mkm+149.6 mkm = 930 mkm)
A Comment (1)
The previous data shows clearly that Jupiter effects on the inner planets orbital
circumferences – and because of that
- Mercury moves during its day period a distance = Mercury Jupiter Distance
- Venus moves during its orbital period a distance = Venus Jupiter Distance
- Earth moves during its orbital period a distance = Earth Jupiter Distance
If we look at the equations from no. (1) to no (16) we will see that there's a direct
light beam between Jupiter and the 3 inner planets –
But
Equation No. 29
This equation shows that Mars orbital distance depend on the distance between Jupiter
and Saturn and for that reason Mars orbital distance behave differently from the other
inner planets –
That may give a reason for the following equation:
4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference) = 3413 mkm (The 4 inner planets orbital
circumferences total +1433.5 mkm (Mars Orbital Circumference) (error 1%) (0.99)
Because Mars light motion depends on (Jupiter Saturn distance) but the other three
planets light motions depend on (Jupiter distance to these 3 planets) for that Mars
behaves differently and its orbital circumferences is used 2 times -
A Comment (2)
The 3 inner planets defined their orbital circumferences to be = their distances to
Jupiter and Jupiter defined its orbital circumference depending on the inner planets
orbital circumferences total – the data shows that – the light motion network (pages
19-20) controls the planets data and causes this deep mutual effect between them
The data proves that "A Planet Motion Depends On A Light Motion"

I do this research
2nd
22
Data No.(6)
The Earth Moon Orbit
The moon orbit area for the distance between Perigee and apogee = 1/2 Jupiter Energy
That means
The moon orbit area can be similar to A Rectangle its breadth =1 mkm
and its length = 100733.5 mkm
Where this number 100733.5 mkm = (1/2) Jupiter Energy
Also
100733.5 mkm = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total
How the value (1/2) of Jupiter energy reaches to the moon orbit?
Light reflection can do that
So there's a light motion accompanying with the planet motion
Or "A Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Now we can't consider this number (100733.5 mkm) reaches to the moon orbit by
pure coincidences of numbers! Why? because
1. Earth Moon Distance At Apogee Point = The Planets Diameters Total
2. Earth Moon Distance At Perigee Point = The Outers Planets Diameters Total
3. The Moon orbit distance from perigee to apogee = the inner planets diameters
total = Earth Circumference
That means
The value (100733.5 mkm = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total) effected on
the moon orbit distances to create a specific relationship with (all) planets diameters
total where the moon data deals with the planets data summations (totals)
this data we have discussed deeply in my previous paper
"Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?"
https://www.academia.edu/43133509/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43140027/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit-ii

I do this research
2nd
23
References
"Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?"
Session
https://www.academia.edu/s/cc50e9c102
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit? (II)
Session
https://www.academia.edu/s/d5bb4cb3ce
Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon & Not Illusion Of Measurements
https://vixra.org/abs/1911.0468
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Is There A Parallel Universe

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Is There A Parallel Universe

Similar to Is There A Parallel Universe (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Is There A Parallel Universe