1. Collaborative Enterprise Architecture for the Government of Canada Thom Kearney Marilou Rooke Jeff Braybrook RDIMS# 698711 Oct 2008

3. Government 2.0 Web 2.0 Collaboration Innovation Trust Transparent & Accountable Internal Modernize Internal Operations PS-Renewal People Workplace External Next Generation Service Gov 2.0

4. Why architecture? Architecture = Descriptions e.g. Words and Pictures for Bridges, Buildings, Town Plans, etc Let’s build a house Yes we should

5. Enterprise Architecture aspects Business Information Technology Application

6. Collaboration environment Internal facing near term Wiki Share Collaborate Social Network Video Sharing Image Sharing Social Bookmarks Web 2.0 on SCNet Etc… Document Sharing Connect GCPEDIA Other Collaboration GC Public Servants ICMS Internal Credential Management GC Enterprise and Departmental Applications Search Content Collections Distributed Computing HR and Finance Etcetera

7. GC IM Strategy Outcomes Framework Government of Canada Information Management Strategy Policy on Information Management Objectives Management Accountability Framework A fully implemented set of policy instruments supporting information management outcomes, defined accountabilities, and enterprise information management governance A highly-skilled Government of Canada workforce that achieves information management outcomes by applying the appropriate information management policy instruments A fully documented and sustainable set of information architecture services, principles, methods, standards and processes that respond to the information needs of the GC enterprise Enterprise information management tools that fully support the business user and that are compliant with the information architecture GC INFORMATION MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK POLICY & GOVERNANCE PEOPLE & CAPACITY ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE IM TOOLS & APPLICATIONS VISION FOR IM IN THE GC Information is safeguarded as a public trust and managed as a strategic asset to maximize its value in the service of Canadians ULTIMATE OUTCOMES Align IM activities Comply with IM Policy instruments more consistently Reduce redundancies and duplication in investments Adopt common or shared IM services Leverage innovation and expertise Address IM skills and capacity issues PRINCIPLES FOR ALIGNMENT OF GC IM STRATEGY OUTCOMES MANAGEMENT EXCELLENCE Delivery of high-value programs, efficiently, transparently, and accountably GC has the capacity to make effective decisions and deliver on priorities

11. Example: Enterprise Service Bus Common Business Processes & Data Models Common Reusable Services Common Technologies & Standards Enterprise Service Bus Service Registry Service Repository Data Warehouse SAP Regional Pay PeopleSoft Program Mgmt Multiple Application Solutions (examples) On-boarding Business Processes HR HR F M P HR HR M F HR P

12. GC SOA Strategic Reference Model Management Accountability Model Business Reference Model Data Model Service Component Model Technical Model SECURITY & IDENTITY MGT INFORMATION & PRIVACY ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS ALIGNMENT & INTEROPERABILITY

14. Reference models & standards

15. Government 2.0 Web 2.0 Collaboration Innovation Trust Transparent & Accountable Internal Modernize Internal Operations PS-Renewal People Workplace External Next Generation Service Gov 2.0