3. Background
• Scarcity of data
– Burden not well understood
• Increasing incidence
– Growing pig populations in many regions
• Common in many developing countries
– Poor meat inspection practices
– Poor sanitation
– Pig keeping practices
– Potential environmental influences?
5. Background
Potential environmental influences
• Egg survival/viability in environment
dependent on
– Temperature
– Humidity
• Eggs can be moved via rivers, flood waters etc
• Exposure of humans/pigs to eggs may vary in
different landscapes
6. Background
Potential environmental influences
• Transmission cycle similar to soil transmitted
helminths (e.g. hookworm, whipworm)
– Environmental drivers widely studied
• Rainfall
• Temperature
• Landcover
• Soil type
• Elevation
• Vegetation
Potential for similar
relationships with
tapeworm distributions
7. Aims
Assess the potential role of environmental
factors in the spatial distribution of human
and pig cyticercosis
8. Methods - data
Study area
• Area of (mainly rural) W Kenya
• Subsistence farming
• People live closely with
livestock
9. Methods – data
• Household level survey (clustered
sample design)
• Questionnaires administered for
each unit (HH, human, pig)
416 households
2113 humans
(blood &
stool)
93 pigs
(blood)
10. Methods - analysis
Regression analysis
– Assess importance of individual and household
level factors (including environment)
– Multilevel modelling
12. Gender
Female ref
Male -
Education
None ref
Primary -
Secondary -
Above -
Well water
No ref
Yes +
Environment
Flooding crops &
grassland
+
Precipitation -
Human cysticercosis
Behaviour and
exposure
Related to knowledge
& practices
Contamination
Egg survival or
probability of exposure
13. Breeding sows
Male ref
Non breeding sow -
Breeding sow +
Environment
Flooding crop &
grassland
+
Porcine cysticercosis
Length of exposure
Egg survival or
probability of exposure
14. Discussion
• Egg survival/viability depends on
– Temperature
– Humidity
• Infection probability depends on
– Exposure
• Egg presence attenuated by
– Flooding
Can be influenced by
vegetative cover
Potentially influenced
by land cover
Influence of flooding
land cover class
15. Discussion
Pig movements
• Spend on average 47% of time outside of
home and utilise ~ 1 km2
– Exposure may occur outside of the home
• Pork consumed often comes from outside the
home
Human movements
• Less restricted than pig movements
16. Limitations
• Small sample size for pig infections
• Variable sensitivity/specificity of assays
• Problems with taeniasis results
• Movements not considered
17. Discussion & conclusions
Evidence of environmental influences
Scope for future research into environmental
drivers of Taenia spatial distributions
18. Acknowledgements
Authors: Nicola A. Wardrop, Lian Thomas, Peter M. Atkinson,
Elizabeth A Cook, Will De Glanville, C Njeri Wamae, Eric M. Fèvre
Medical Research Council
Wellcome Trust & BBSRC Contact:
Nicola.Wardrop@soton.ac.uk
@DiseaseMapper
www.nicolawardrop.co.uk
Thank you for
your attention!
Editor's Notes
Spatial overlap little studied. General presumption that if it is there in pigs it is risk to humans...
Eggs extremely vulnerable to dessication. Noted that tropical climates may be particularly suitable for egg survival
STH’s are transmitted via contamination of environment with eggs via faeces, although they have an essential maturation stage in the soil before they become infective.
Tested by parasitological (human stool – taeniasis) and immunological (human and pig blood – cysticercosis) diagnostic methods.