Fuel cycle risks imposed by a nuclear growth scenario
1. 4th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC Davos 2012
Fuel cycle risks imposed by a
nuclear growth scenario
Nikolaus Arnold, Klaus Gufler
Institute of Security - and Risk Sciences, University of
Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
29. August 2012
2. Nuclear growth projections
o Even after Fukushima
• IEA – World Energy Outlook:
„In the New Policies Scenario, nuclear output rises by more than 70%
over the period to 2035, only slightly less than projected last year.”
• IAEA in March 2012:
“..between 35 and 100 percent by 2030 ..”
3. U supply scenarios
• Several publications
suggest shortfalls in
supply
o Concerning amounts and
capbabilities to mine
Source: EWG 2006
Source: M. Guidolin: A nuclear power renaissance?
4. U supply scenarios
• Even in the nuclear industry …
Sources: WNA and Uranium 1
• Possible outcomes
o U expensive or not supplyable
o Shortage in energy supply / blackouts
6. Producers vs. consumers
Figures from Uranium 2011: Resources, production and demand, OECD/IAEA 2012
• Transport
o Large distances
o Good safety/security record
o More incidents with rising demand can be expected
7. Global NFC Network
Uranium Ore Concentrate (UOC)
UOC or Uranium compounds
Enriched uranium
Data: United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database
Nuclear Fuel
8. European NFC Network
European NFC - Status 2009
Analysis with Pajek – Program for Large Network Analysis. (http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/)
10. Conclusions
• Growth in nuclear energy share will need adoption
of fuel cycle
• NFC - complex global network
• Few data publically available, data not consistent
• Mining capacities to be developed
• Underestimation of supply risk due to historical
development
• Few large enrichment and conversion facilities
o Located in few countries
o Development of NFC facilities in Asia?
• Some countries may have to reconsider nuclear
plans