SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 64
Download to read offline
1
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Slides by
JOHN
LOUCKS
St. Edward’s
University
2
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Management Science Revolution
 According to Irv Lustig of ILOG Inc., solution methods
developed today are 10, 000 times faster than the ones
used 15 years ago.
 Quantitative methods are especially helpful with large,
complex problems. For example, in the coordination of
thousands of tasks associated with landing Apollo 11
safely on the moon, quantitative techniques helped to
ensure that more than 300, 000 pieces of work performed
by more than 400,000 people were integrated smoothly.
 Herbert A. Simon, a Nobel Prize winner in economics
and an expert in decision making, said that a
mathematical model does not have to be exact; it just has
to be close enough to provide better results than can be
obtained by common sense.
3
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 1
Introduction
 Body of Knowledge
 Problem Solving and Decision Making
 Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making
 Quantitative Analysis
 Models of Cost, Revenue, and Profit
 Management Science Techniques
4
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Body of Knowledge
 The body of knowledge involving quantitative
approaches to decision making is referred to as
•Management Science
•Operations Research
•Decision Science
 It had its early roots in World War II and is flourishing
in business and industry due, in part, to:
•numerous methodological developments (e.g.
simplex method for solving linear programming
problems)
•a virtual explosion in computing power
5
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
 7 Steps of Problem Solving
(First 5 steps are the process of decision making)
1. Identify and define the problem.
2. Determine the set of alternative solutions.
3. Determine the criteria for evaluating alternatives.
4. Evaluate the alternatives.
5. Choose an alternative (make a decision).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Implement the selected alternative.
7. Evaluate the results.
Problem Solving and Decision Making
6
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making
Define
the
Problem
Identify
the
Alternatives
Determine
the
Criteria
Evaluate
the
Alternatives
Choose
an
Alternative
Structuring the Problem Analyzing the Problem
 Decision-Making Process
7
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Analysis Phase of Decision-Making Process
 Qualitative Analysis
• based largely on the manager’s judgment and
experience
• includes the manager’s intuitive “feel” for the
problem
• is more of an art than a science
Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making
8
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Analysis Phase of Decision-Making Process
 Quantitative Analysis
• analyst will concentrate on the quantitative facts
or data associated with the problem
• analyst will develop mathematical expressions
that describe the objectives, constraints, and
other relationships that exist in the problem
• analyst will use one or more quantitative
methods to make a recommendation
Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making
9
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making
 Potential Reasons for a Quantitative Analysis
Approach to Decision Making
•The problem is complex.
•The problem is very important.
•The problem is new.
•The problem is repetitive.
10
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Quantitative Analysis
 Quantitative Analysis Process
•Model Development
•Data Preparation
•Model Solution
•Report Generation
11
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Model Development
 Models are representations of real objects or situations
 Three forms of models are:
•Iconic models - physical replicas (scalar
representations) of real objects
•Analog models - physical in form, but do not
physically resemble the object being modeled
•Mathematical models - represent real world
problems through a system of mathematical
formulas and expressions based on key
assumptions, estimates, or statistical analyses
12
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Advantages of Models
 Generally, experimenting with models (compared to
experimenting with the real situation):
•requires less time
•is less expensive
•involves less risk
 The more closely the model represents the real
situation, the accurate the conclusions and predictions
will be.
13
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Mathematical Models
 Objective Function – a mathematical expression that
describes the problem’s objective, such as maximizing
profit or minimizing cost
 Constraints – a set of restrictions or limitations, such as
production capacities
 Uncontrollable Inputs – environmental factors that are
not under the control of the decision maker
 Decision Variables – controllable inputs; decision
alternatives specified by the decision maker, such as the
number of units of Product X to produce
14
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Mathematical Models
 Deterministic Model – if all uncontrollable inputs to the
model are known and cannot vary
 Stochastic (or Probabilistic) Model – if any uncontrollable
are uncertain and subject to variation
 Stochastic models are often more difficult to analyze.
15
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Mathematical Models
 Cost/benefit considerations must be made in selecting
an appropriate mathematical model.
 Frequently a less complicated (and perhaps less
precise) model is more appropriate than a more
complex and accurate one due to cost and ease of
solution considerations.
16
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
O.R.Models
 OR models address three main questions:
 What are the decision alternatives?
 Under what restrictions is the decision made?
 What is an appropriate objective criterion for
evaluating the alternatives?
17
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
River Crossing Problem
 Amy, Jim, John, and Kelly are standing on the east bank
of a river and wish to cross to the west side using a canoe.
The canoe can hold at most two individuals at a time.
Amy, being the most athletic, can cross the river in one
minute. Jim, John, and Kelly would take 2, 5, and 10
minutes respectively. If two people are in the canoe, the
slower person dictates the crossing time. The objective is
for all four individuals to be on the other side of the river
in the least time possible.
• Identify at least two feasible plans for crossing the
river (remember, the canoe is the only mode of
transportation and it cannot be shuttled empty).
• Define the criterion for evaluating the alternatives.
• What is the smallest time for moving all four
individuals to the other side of the river?
18
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
River Crossing Problem (contd.)
19
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Another example
 Consider forming a maximum area rectangle out of a piece of
wire of length L cms.
 Here the number of alternatives is not finite, since the length
and width of the rectangle can assume infinite possibilities.
 Hence the alternatives of the problem are identified by
defining the length and width as continuous (algebraic)
variables.
 Let
 l = length of the rectangle in cms
 w = width of the rectangle in cms.
 Based on the above definitions the restrictions can be
expressed verbally as
 Length of rectangle + width of rectangle = half of the length of
the wire.
 Length and width cannot be negative.
20
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Another example
 We may write these conditions algebraically as
 2(l+w) = L
 l>= 0, w>=0.
 We now define the remaining component of objective of the
problem:
 Maximize z=lw, where z is defined as the area of the rectangle.
 The complete model becomes
 Maximize z=lw,
 Subject to
 2(l+w) = L
 l, w >=0.
 The optimal solution of this model is l=w = L/4, which means
we have to construct a square.
21
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
OR Model format
 An OR model is usually presented in the following
format:
 Maximize or minimize objective functionSubject
toconstraints
 A solution of the model is feasible if it satisfies all the
constraints.
 It is optimal if, in addition to being feasible, it yields the
best (maximum or Minimum) value of the objective
function.
 In the tickets example, there are three feasible
alternatives and the third one yields the optimal
solution.
 In the rectangle example, a feasible alternative must
satisfy the condition l+w = L/2 with l and w assuming
non – negative values. This leads to infinity of feasible
solutions and the optimal solution is determined by an
appropriate mathematical tool (in this case, differential
calculus).
22
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Quality and sub- optimality
 Quality and sub- optimality
 OR models are designed to optimize a specific
objective criterion subject to a set of constraints.
 However the quality of the resulting solution
depends on the accuracy of the model in
representing the real system.
 For example, in the tickets problem, if one is not
able to identify all the dominant alternatives, then
the resulting solution is only optimal relative to the
choices represented in the model. To be specific, if
alt 3 is left out of the model, and then the resulting
optimal solution would call for spending Rs.44000
to purchase the tickets, which provides only a sub
optimal solution to the problem.
 Hence it can be concluded that the optimal solution
is best only for that model. If the model represents
the real system reasonably well, then its solution is
optimal also for the real situation.
23
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Transforming Model Inputs into Output
Uncontrollable Inputs
(Environmental Factors)
Controllable
Inputs
(Decision
Variables)
Output
(Projected
Results)
Mathematical
Model
24
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Data Preparation
 Data preparation is not a trivial step, due to the time
required and the possibility of data collection errors.
 A model with 50 decision variables and 25 constraints
could have over 1300 data elements!
 Often, a fairly large data base is needed.
 Information systems specialists might be needed.
25
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Model Solution
 The analyst attempts to identify the alternative (the
set of decision variable values) that provides the
“best” output for the model.
 The “best” output is the optimal solution.
 If the alternative does not satisfy all of the model
constraints, it is rejected as being infeasible, regardless
of the objective function value.
 If the alternative satisfies all of the model constraints,
it is feasible and a candidate for the “best” solution.
26
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Model Solution
 One solution approach is trial-and-error.
•Might not provide the best solution
•Inefficient (numerous calculations required)
 Special solution procedures have been developed for
specific mathematical models.
•Some small models/problems can be solved by
hand calculations
•Most practical applications require using a
computer
27
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Model Solution
 A variety of software packages are available for
solving mathematical models.
•Microsoft Excel
•The Management Scientist
•LINGO
28
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Model Testing and Validation
 Often, goodness/accuracy of a model cannot be
assessed until solutions are generated.
 Small test problems having known, or at least
expected, solutions can be used for model testing and
validation.
 If the model generates expected solutions, use the
model on the full-scale problem.
 If inaccuracies or potential shortcomings inherent in
the model are identified, take corrective action such
as:
•Collection of more-accurate input data
•Modification of the model
29
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Report Generation
 A managerial report, based on the results of the
model, should be prepared.
 The report should be easily understood by the
decision maker.
 The report should include:
•the recommended decision
•other pertinent information about the results (for
example, how sensitive the model solution is to the
assumptions and data used in the model)
30
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Implementation and Follow-Up
 Successful implementation of model results is of
critical importance.
 Secure as much user involvement as possible
throughout the modeling process.
 Continue to monitor the contribution of the model.
 It might be necessary to refine or expand the model.
31
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Austin Auto Auction
An auctioneer has developed a simple
mathematical model for deciding the starting bid he
will require when auctioning a used automobile.
Essentially, he sets the starting bid at seventy
percent of what he predicts the final winning bid will
(or should) be. He predicts the winning bid by
starting with the car's original selling price and
making two deductions, one based on the car's age
and the other based on the car's mileage.
The age deduction is $800 per year and the
mileage deduction is $.025 per mile.
32
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Austin Auto Auction
 Question:
Develop the mathematical model that will give
the starting bid (B ) for a car in terms of the car's
original price (P ), current age (A) and mileage (M ).
33
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
 Answer:
The expected winning bid can be expressed as:
P - 800(A) - .025(M )
The entire model is:
B = .7(expected winning bid)
B = .7(P - 800(A) - .025(M ))
B = .7(P )- 560(A) - .0175(M )
Example: Austin Auto Auction
34
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Austin Auto Auction
 Question:
Suppose a four-year old car with 60,000 miles on
the odometer is being auctioned. If its original price
was $12,500, what starting bid should the auctioneer
require?
 Answer:
B = .7(12,500) - 560(4) - .0175(60,000) = $5,460
35
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Austin Auto Auction
 Question:
The model is based on what assumptions?
 Answer:
The model assumes that the only factors
influencing the value of a used car are the original
price, age, and mileage (not condition, rarity, or other
factors).
Also, it is assumed that age and mileage devalue a
car in a linear manner and without limit. (Note, the
starting bid for a very old car might be negative!)
36
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
Iron Works, Inc. manufactures two
products made from steel and just received
this month's allocation of b pounds of steel.
It takes a1 pounds of steel to make a unit of product 1
and a2 pounds of steel to make a unit of product 2.
Let x1 and x2 denote this month's production level of
product 1 and product 2, respectively. Denote by p1 and
p2 the unit profits for products 1 and 2, respectively.
Iron Works has a contract calling for at least m units of
product 1 this month. The firm's facilities are such that at
most u units of product 2 may be produced monthly.
37
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
 Mathematical Model
•The total monthly profit =
(profit per unit of product 1)
x (monthly production of product 1)
+ (profit per unit of product 2)
x (monthly production of product 2)
= p1x1 + p2x2
We want to maximize total monthly profit:
Max p1x1 + p2x2
38
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
 Mathematical Model (continued)
•The total amount of steel used during monthly
production equals:
(steel required per unit of product 1)
x (monthly production of product 1)
+ (steel required per unit of product 2)
x (monthly production of product 2)
= a1x1 + a2x2
This quantity must be less than or equal to the
allocated b pounds of steel:
a1x1 + a2x2 < b
39
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
 Mathematical Model (continued)
•The monthly production level of product 1 must
be greater than or equal to m :
x1 > m
•The monthly production level of product 2 must
be less than or equal to u :
x2 < u
•However, the production level for product 2
cannot be negative:
x2 > 0
40
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
 Mathematical Model Summary
Max p1x1 + p2x2
s.t. a1x1 + a2x2 < b
x1 > m
x2 < u
x2 > 0
Objectiv
e
Function
“Subject to”
Constraint
s
41
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
 Question:
Suppose b = 2000, a1 = 2, a2 = 3, m = 60, u = 720,
p1 = 100, p2 = 200. Rewrite the model with these
specific values for the uncontrollable inputs.
42
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
 Answer:
Substituting, the model is:
Max 100x1 + 200x2
s.t. 2x1 + 3x2 < 2000
x1 > 60
x2 < 720
x2 > 0
43
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
 Question:
The optimal solution to the current model is x1 =
60 and x2 = 626 2/3. If the product were engines,
explain why this is not a true optimal solution for the
"real-life" problem.
 Answer:
One cannot produce and sell 2/3 of an engine.
Thus the problem is further restricted by the fact that
both x1 and x2 must be integers. (They could remain
fractions if it is assumed these fractions are work in
progress to be completed the next month.)
44
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Iron Works, Inc.
Uncontrollable Inputs
$100 profit per unit Prod. 1
$200 profit per unit Prod. 2
2 lbs. steel per unit Prod. 1
3 lbs. Steel per unit Prod. 2
2000 lbs. steel allocated
60 units minimum Prod. 1
720 units maximum Prod. 2
0 units minimum Prod. 2
60 units Prod. 1
626.67 units Prod. 2
Controllable Inputs
Profit = $131,333.33
Steel Used = 2000
Output
Mathematical Model
Max 100(60) + 200(626.67)
s.t. 2(60) + 3(626.67) < 2000
60 > 60
626.67 < 720
626.67 > 0
45
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
Ponderosa Development Corporation
(PDC) is a small real estate developer that builds
only one style house. The selling price of the house is
$115,000.
Land for each house costs $55,000 and lumber,
supplies, and other materials run another $28,000 per
house. Total labor costs are approximately $20,000 per
house.
46
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
Ponderosa leases office space for $2,000
per month. The cost of supplies, utilities, and
leased equipment runs another $3,000 per month.
The one salesperson of PDC is paid a commission
of $2,000 on the sale of each house. PDC has seven
permanent office employees whose monthly salaries
are given on the next slide.
47
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
Employee Monthly Salary
President $10,000
VP, Development 6,000
VP, Marketing 4,500
Project Manager 5,500
Controller 4,000
Office Manager 3,000
Receptionist 2,000
48
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Question:
Identify all costs and denote the marginal cost
and marginal revenue for each house.
 Answer:
The monthly salaries total $35,000 and monthly
office lease and supply costs total another $5,000.
This $40,000 is a monthly fixed cost.
The total cost of land, material, labor, and sales
commission per house, $105,000, is the marginal cost
for a house.
The selling price of $115,000 is the marginal
revenue per house.
49
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Question:
Write the monthly cost function c (x), revenue
function r (x), and profit function p (x).
 Answer:
c (x) = variable cost + fixed cost = 105,000x + 40,000
r (x) = 115,000x
p (x) = r (x) - c (x) = 10,000x - 40,000
50
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Question:
What is the breakeven point for monthly sales
of the houses?
 Answer:
r (x ) = c (x )
115,000x = 105,000x + 40,000
Solving, x = 4.
51
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Question:
What is the monthly profit if 12 houses per
month are built and sold?
 Answer:
p (12) = 10,000(12) - 40,000 = $80,000 monthly profit
52
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of Houses Sold (x)
Thousands
of
Dollars
Break-Even Point = 4 Houses
Total Cost =
40,000 + 105,000x
Total Revenue =
115,000x
53
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Management Science Techniques
 Linear Programming
 Integer Linear
Programming
 PERT/CPM
 Inventory Models
 Waiting Line Models
 Simulation
 Decision Analysis
 Goal Programming
 Analytic Hierarchy
Process
 Forecasting
 Markov-Process Models
 Dynamic Programming
54
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
The Management Scientist Software
 12 Modules
55
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Using Excel for Breakeven Analysis
 A spreadsheet software package such as Microsoft
Excel can be used to perform a quantitative analysis of
Ponderosa Development Corporation.
 We will enter the problem data in the top portion of
the spreadsheet.
 The bottom of the spreadsheet will be used for model
development.
56
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Formula Spreadsheet
A B
1 PROBLEM DATA
2 Fixed Cost $40,000
3 Variable Cost Per Unit $105,000
4 Selling Price Per Unit $115,000
5 MODEL
6 Sales Volume
7 Total Revenue =B4*B6
8 Total Cost =B2+B3*B6
9 Total Profit (Loss) =B7-B8
57
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Question
What is the monthly profit if 12 houses are built
and sold per month?
58
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Spreadsheet Solution
A B
1 PROBLEM DATA
2 Fixed Cost $40,000
3 Variable Cost Per Unit $105,000
4 Selling Price Per Unit $115,000
5 MODEL
6 Sales Volume 12
7 Total Revenue $1,380,000
8 Total Cost $1,300,000
9 Total Profit (Loss) $80,000
59
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Question:
What is the breakeven point for monthly sales
of the houses?
 Spreadsheet Solution:
•One way to determine the break-even point using a
spreadsheet is to use the Goal Seek tool.
•Microsoft Excel ‘s Goal Seek tool allows the user to
determine the value for an input cell that will cause
the output cell to equal some specified value.
•In our case, the goal is to set Total Profit to zero by
seeking an appropriate value for Sales Volume.
60
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Spreadsheet Solution: Goal Seek Approach
Using Excel ’s Goal Seek Tool
Step 1: Select the Tools menu
Step 2: Choose the Goal Seek option
Step 3: When the Goal Seek dialog box appears:
Enter B9 in the Set cell box
Enter 0 in the To value box
Enter B6 in the By changing cell box
Click OK
61
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Spreadsheet Solution: Goal Seek Approach
Completed Goal Seek Dialog Box
62
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.
 Spreadsheet Solution: Goal Seek Approach
A B
1 PROBLEM DATA
2 Fixed Cost $40,000
3 Variable Cost Per Unit $105,000
4 Selling Price Per Unit $115,000
5 MODEL
6 Sales Volume 4
7 Total Revenue $460,000
8 Total Cost $460,000
9 Total Profit (Loss) $0
63
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
Management Science Revolution
 According to Irv Lustig of ILOG Inc., solution methods
developed today are 10, 000 times faster than the ones
used 15 years ago.
 Quantitative methods are especially helpful with large,
complex problems. For example, in the coordination of
thousands of tasks associated with landing Apollo 11
safely on the moon, quantitative techniques helped to
ensure that more than 300, 000 pieces of work performed
by more than 400,000 people were integrated smoothly.
 Herbert A. Simon, a Nobel Prize winner in economics
and an expert in decision making, said that a
mathematical model does not have to be exact; it just has
to be close enough to provide better results than can be
obtained by common sense.
64
Slide
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved
End of Chapter 1

More Related Content

Similar to 1-2 Introduction to MS.pdf

PHD research publications 26.pdf
PHD research publications 26.pdfPHD research publications 26.pdf
PHD research publications 26.pdfnareshkotra
 
fast publications journal.pdf
fast publications journal.pdffast publications journal.pdf
fast publications journal.pdfnareshkotra
 
Operations research.pptx
Operations research.pptxOperations research.pptx
Operations research.pptxssuserad3989
 
Recent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimization
Recent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimizationRecent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimization
Recent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimizationjournalBEEI
 
Fundamentals of Quantitative Analysis
Fundamentals of Quantitative AnalysisFundamentals of Quantitative Analysis
Fundamentals of Quantitative AnalysisJubayer Alam Shoikat
 
Introduction to operations research
Introduction to operations researchIntroduction to operations research
Introduction to operations researchDr. Abdulfatah Salem
 
Assignment oprations research luv
Assignment oprations research luvAssignment oprations research luv
Assignment oprations research luvAshok Sharma
 
Supply Chain Management - Optimization technology
Supply Chain Management - Optimization technologySupply Chain Management - Optimization technology
Supply Chain Management - Optimization technologyNurhazman Abdul Aziz
 
Mb0048 operations research
Mb0048  operations researchMb0048  operations research
Mb0048 operations researchsmumbahelp
 
Operations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdf
Operations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdfOperations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdf
Operations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdfRoopaDNDandally
 
Quantitative management
Quantitative managementQuantitative management
Quantitative managementsmumbahelp
 
Mb0048 operations research
Mb0048  operations researchMb0048  operations research
Mb0048 operations researchsmumbahelp
 
Operations Research.pptx
Operations Research.pptxOperations Research.pptx
Operations Research.pptxbanhi.guha
 
Discrete Choice Model - Part 2
Discrete Choice Model - Part 2Discrete Choice Model - Part 2
Discrete Choice Model - Part 2Michael770443
 
UNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptx
UNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptxUNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptx
UNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptxMinilikDerseh1
 

Similar to 1-2 Introduction to MS.pdf (20)

PHD research publications 26.pdf
PHD research publications 26.pdfPHD research publications 26.pdf
PHD research publications 26.pdf
 
fast publications journal.pdf
fast publications journal.pdffast publications journal.pdf
fast publications journal.pdf
 
Operations research.pptx
Operations research.pptxOperations research.pptx
Operations research.pptx
 
Recent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimization
Recent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimizationRecent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimization
Recent research in finding the optimal path by ant colony optimization
 
Fundamentals of Quantitative Analysis
Fundamentals of Quantitative AnalysisFundamentals of Quantitative Analysis
Fundamentals of Quantitative Analysis
 
Introduction to operations research
Introduction to operations researchIntroduction to operations research
Introduction to operations research
 
Assignment oprations research luv
Assignment oprations research luvAssignment oprations research luv
Assignment oprations research luv
 
Supply Chain Management - Optimization technology
Supply Chain Management - Optimization technologySupply Chain Management - Optimization technology
Supply Chain Management - Optimization technology
 
Lecture6 xing
Lecture6 xingLecture6 xing
Lecture6 xing
 
Mb0048 operations research
Mb0048  operations researchMb0048  operations research
Mb0048 operations research
 
Or senting
Or sentingOr senting
Or senting
 
Simulation
SimulationSimulation
Simulation
 
Operations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdf
Operations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdfOperations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdf
Operations Research_18ME735_module 1_LPP.pdf
 
Quantitative management
Quantitative managementQuantitative management
Quantitative management
 
Mb0048 operations research
Mb0048  operations researchMb0048  operations research
Mb0048 operations research
 
455566
455566455566
455566
 
cs1538.ppt
cs1538.pptcs1538.ppt
cs1538.ppt
 
Operations Research.pptx
Operations Research.pptxOperations Research.pptx
Operations Research.pptx
 
Discrete Choice Model - Part 2
Discrete Choice Model - Part 2Discrete Choice Model - Part 2
Discrete Choice Model - Part 2
 
UNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptx
UNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptxUNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptx
UNIT-2 Quantitaitive Anlaysis for Mgt Decisions.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...EduSkills OECD
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio AppImproved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio AppCeline George
 
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFThe Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFVivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxPSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxMarlene Maheu
 
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxObserving-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxAdelaideRefugio
 
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024Borja Sotomayor
 
male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................MirzaAbrarBaig5
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptNishitharanjan Rout
 
MOOD STABLIZERS DRUGS.pptx
MOOD     STABLIZERS           DRUGS.pptxMOOD     STABLIZERS           DRUGS.pptx
MOOD STABLIZERS DRUGS.pptxPoojaSen20
 
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
ANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptxANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptx
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptxPoojaSen20
 
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfFICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfPondicherry University
 
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code ExamplesSPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code ExamplesPeter Brusilovsky
 
diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....
diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....
diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....Ritu480198
 
SURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project researchSURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project researchCaitlinCummins3
 
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life PowerpointBook Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint23600690
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
 
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio AppImproved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
Improved Approval Flow in Odoo 17 Studio App
 
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFThe Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
 
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxPSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
 
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxObserving-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
 
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
 
male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
 
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
 
MOOD STABLIZERS DRUGS.pptx
MOOD     STABLIZERS           DRUGS.pptxMOOD     STABLIZERS           DRUGS.pptx
MOOD STABLIZERS DRUGS.pptx
 
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
ANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptxANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptx
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
 
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 07 (Networks)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 07 (Networks)ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 07 (Networks)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 07 (Networks)
 
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfFICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"
 
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code ExamplesSPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
 
diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....
diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....
diagnosting testing bsc 2nd sem.pptx....
 
SURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project researchSURVEY I created for uni project research
SURVEY I created for uni project research
 
Including Mental Health Support in Project Delivery, 14 May.pdf
Including Mental Health Support in Project Delivery, 14 May.pdfIncluding Mental Health Support in Project Delivery, 14 May.pdf
Including Mental Health Support in Project Delivery, 14 May.pdf
 
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life PowerpointBook Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
 

1-2 Introduction to MS.pdf

  • 1. 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University
  • 2. 2 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Management Science Revolution  According to Irv Lustig of ILOG Inc., solution methods developed today are 10, 000 times faster than the ones used 15 years ago.  Quantitative methods are especially helpful with large, complex problems. For example, in the coordination of thousands of tasks associated with landing Apollo 11 safely on the moon, quantitative techniques helped to ensure that more than 300, 000 pieces of work performed by more than 400,000 people were integrated smoothly.  Herbert A. Simon, a Nobel Prize winner in economics and an expert in decision making, said that a mathematical model does not have to be exact; it just has to be close enough to provide better results than can be obtained by common sense.
  • 3. 3 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 1 Introduction  Body of Knowledge  Problem Solving and Decision Making  Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making  Quantitative Analysis  Models of Cost, Revenue, and Profit  Management Science Techniques
  • 4. 4 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Body of Knowledge  The body of knowledge involving quantitative approaches to decision making is referred to as •Management Science •Operations Research •Decision Science  It had its early roots in World War II and is flourishing in business and industry due, in part, to: •numerous methodological developments (e.g. simplex method for solving linear programming problems) •a virtual explosion in computing power
  • 5. 5 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved  7 Steps of Problem Solving (First 5 steps are the process of decision making) 1. Identify and define the problem. 2. Determine the set of alternative solutions. 3. Determine the criteria for evaluating alternatives. 4. Evaluate the alternatives. 5. Choose an alternative (make a decision). --------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Implement the selected alternative. 7. Evaluate the results. Problem Solving and Decision Making
  • 6. 6 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making Define the Problem Identify the Alternatives Determine the Criteria Evaluate the Alternatives Choose an Alternative Structuring the Problem Analyzing the Problem  Decision-Making Process
  • 7. 7 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Analysis Phase of Decision-Making Process  Qualitative Analysis • based largely on the manager’s judgment and experience • includes the manager’s intuitive “feel” for the problem • is more of an art than a science Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making
  • 8. 8 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Analysis Phase of Decision-Making Process  Quantitative Analysis • analyst will concentrate on the quantitative facts or data associated with the problem • analyst will develop mathematical expressions that describe the objectives, constraints, and other relationships that exist in the problem • analyst will use one or more quantitative methods to make a recommendation Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making
  • 9. 9 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making  Potential Reasons for a Quantitative Analysis Approach to Decision Making •The problem is complex. •The problem is very important. •The problem is new. •The problem is repetitive.
  • 10. 10 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Quantitative Analysis  Quantitative Analysis Process •Model Development •Data Preparation •Model Solution •Report Generation
  • 11. 11 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Model Development  Models are representations of real objects or situations  Three forms of models are: •Iconic models - physical replicas (scalar representations) of real objects •Analog models - physical in form, but do not physically resemble the object being modeled •Mathematical models - represent real world problems through a system of mathematical formulas and expressions based on key assumptions, estimates, or statistical analyses
  • 12. 12 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Advantages of Models  Generally, experimenting with models (compared to experimenting with the real situation): •requires less time •is less expensive •involves less risk  The more closely the model represents the real situation, the accurate the conclusions and predictions will be.
  • 13. 13 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Mathematical Models  Objective Function – a mathematical expression that describes the problem’s objective, such as maximizing profit or minimizing cost  Constraints – a set of restrictions or limitations, such as production capacities  Uncontrollable Inputs – environmental factors that are not under the control of the decision maker  Decision Variables – controllable inputs; decision alternatives specified by the decision maker, such as the number of units of Product X to produce
  • 14. 14 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Mathematical Models  Deterministic Model – if all uncontrollable inputs to the model are known and cannot vary  Stochastic (or Probabilistic) Model – if any uncontrollable are uncertain and subject to variation  Stochastic models are often more difficult to analyze.
  • 15. 15 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Mathematical Models  Cost/benefit considerations must be made in selecting an appropriate mathematical model.  Frequently a less complicated (and perhaps less precise) model is more appropriate than a more complex and accurate one due to cost and ease of solution considerations.
  • 16. 16 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved O.R.Models  OR models address three main questions:  What are the decision alternatives?  Under what restrictions is the decision made?  What is an appropriate objective criterion for evaluating the alternatives?
  • 17. 17 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved River Crossing Problem  Amy, Jim, John, and Kelly are standing on the east bank of a river and wish to cross to the west side using a canoe. The canoe can hold at most two individuals at a time. Amy, being the most athletic, can cross the river in one minute. Jim, John, and Kelly would take 2, 5, and 10 minutes respectively. If two people are in the canoe, the slower person dictates the crossing time. The objective is for all four individuals to be on the other side of the river in the least time possible. • Identify at least two feasible plans for crossing the river (remember, the canoe is the only mode of transportation and it cannot be shuttled empty). • Define the criterion for evaluating the alternatives. • What is the smallest time for moving all four individuals to the other side of the river?
  • 18. 18 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved River Crossing Problem (contd.)
  • 19. 19 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Another example  Consider forming a maximum area rectangle out of a piece of wire of length L cms.  Here the number of alternatives is not finite, since the length and width of the rectangle can assume infinite possibilities.  Hence the alternatives of the problem are identified by defining the length and width as continuous (algebraic) variables.  Let  l = length of the rectangle in cms  w = width of the rectangle in cms.  Based on the above definitions the restrictions can be expressed verbally as  Length of rectangle + width of rectangle = half of the length of the wire.  Length and width cannot be negative.
  • 20. 20 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Another example  We may write these conditions algebraically as  2(l+w) = L  l>= 0, w>=0.  We now define the remaining component of objective of the problem:  Maximize z=lw, where z is defined as the area of the rectangle.  The complete model becomes  Maximize z=lw,  Subject to  2(l+w) = L  l, w >=0.  The optimal solution of this model is l=w = L/4, which means we have to construct a square.
  • 21. 21 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved OR Model format  An OR model is usually presented in the following format:  Maximize or minimize objective functionSubject toconstraints  A solution of the model is feasible if it satisfies all the constraints.  It is optimal if, in addition to being feasible, it yields the best (maximum or Minimum) value of the objective function.  In the tickets example, there are three feasible alternatives and the third one yields the optimal solution.  In the rectangle example, a feasible alternative must satisfy the condition l+w = L/2 with l and w assuming non – negative values. This leads to infinity of feasible solutions and the optimal solution is determined by an appropriate mathematical tool (in this case, differential calculus).
  • 22. 22 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Quality and sub- optimality  Quality and sub- optimality  OR models are designed to optimize a specific objective criterion subject to a set of constraints.  However the quality of the resulting solution depends on the accuracy of the model in representing the real system.  For example, in the tickets problem, if one is not able to identify all the dominant alternatives, then the resulting solution is only optimal relative to the choices represented in the model. To be specific, if alt 3 is left out of the model, and then the resulting optimal solution would call for spending Rs.44000 to purchase the tickets, which provides only a sub optimal solution to the problem.  Hence it can be concluded that the optimal solution is best only for that model. If the model represents the real system reasonably well, then its solution is optimal also for the real situation.
  • 23. 23 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Transforming Model Inputs into Output Uncontrollable Inputs (Environmental Factors) Controllable Inputs (Decision Variables) Output (Projected Results) Mathematical Model
  • 24. 24 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Data Preparation  Data preparation is not a trivial step, due to the time required and the possibility of data collection errors.  A model with 50 decision variables and 25 constraints could have over 1300 data elements!  Often, a fairly large data base is needed.  Information systems specialists might be needed.
  • 25. 25 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Model Solution  The analyst attempts to identify the alternative (the set of decision variable values) that provides the “best” output for the model.  The “best” output is the optimal solution.  If the alternative does not satisfy all of the model constraints, it is rejected as being infeasible, regardless of the objective function value.  If the alternative satisfies all of the model constraints, it is feasible and a candidate for the “best” solution.
  • 26. 26 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Model Solution  One solution approach is trial-and-error. •Might not provide the best solution •Inefficient (numerous calculations required)  Special solution procedures have been developed for specific mathematical models. •Some small models/problems can be solved by hand calculations •Most practical applications require using a computer
  • 27. 27 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Model Solution  A variety of software packages are available for solving mathematical models. •Microsoft Excel •The Management Scientist •LINGO
  • 28. 28 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Model Testing and Validation  Often, goodness/accuracy of a model cannot be assessed until solutions are generated.  Small test problems having known, or at least expected, solutions can be used for model testing and validation.  If the model generates expected solutions, use the model on the full-scale problem.  If inaccuracies or potential shortcomings inherent in the model are identified, take corrective action such as: •Collection of more-accurate input data •Modification of the model
  • 29. 29 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Report Generation  A managerial report, based on the results of the model, should be prepared.  The report should be easily understood by the decision maker.  The report should include: •the recommended decision •other pertinent information about the results (for example, how sensitive the model solution is to the assumptions and data used in the model)
  • 30. 30 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Implementation and Follow-Up  Successful implementation of model results is of critical importance.  Secure as much user involvement as possible throughout the modeling process.  Continue to monitor the contribution of the model.  It might be necessary to refine or expand the model.
  • 31. 31 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Austin Auto Auction An auctioneer has developed a simple mathematical model for deciding the starting bid he will require when auctioning a used automobile. Essentially, he sets the starting bid at seventy percent of what he predicts the final winning bid will (or should) be. He predicts the winning bid by starting with the car's original selling price and making two deductions, one based on the car's age and the other based on the car's mileage. The age deduction is $800 per year and the mileage deduction is $.025 per mile.
  • 32. 32 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Austin Auto Auction  Question: Develop the mathematical model that will give the starting bid (B ) for a car in terms of the car's original price (P ), current age (A) and mileage (M ).
  • 33. 33 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved  Answer: The expected winning bid can be expressed as: P - 800(A) - .025(M ) The entire model is: B = .7(expected winning bid) B = .7(P - 800(A) - .025(M )) B = .7(P )- 560(A) - .0175(M ) Example: Austin Auto Auction
  • 34. 34 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Austin Auto Auction  Question: Suppose a four-year old car with 60,000 miles on the odometer is being auctioned. If its original price was $12,500, what starting bid should the auctioneer require?  Answer: B = .7(12,500) - 560(4) - .0175(60,000) = $5,460
  • 35. 35 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Austin Auto Auction  Question: The model is based on what assumptions?  Answer: The model assumes that the only factors influencing the value of a used car are the original price, age, and mileage (not condition, rarity, or other factors). Also, it is assumed that age and mileage devalue a car in a linear manner and without limit. (Note, the starting bid for a very old car might be negative!)
  • 36. 36 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc. Iron Works, Inc. manufactures two products made from steel and just received this month's allocation of b pounds of steel. It takes a1 pounds of steel to make a unit of product 1 and a2 pounds of steel to make a unit of product 2. Let x1 and x2 denote this month's production level of product 1 and product 2, respectively. Denote by p1 and p2 the unit profits for products 1 and 2, respectively. Iron Works has a contract calling for at least m units of product 1 this month. The firm's facilities are such that at most u units of product 2 may be produced monthly.
  • 37. 37 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc.  Mathematical Model •The total monthly profit = (profit per unit of product 1) x (monthly production of product 1) + (profit per unit of product 2) x (monthly production of product 2) = p1x1 + p2x2 We want to maximize total monthly profit: Max p1x1 + p2x2
  • 38. 38 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc.  Mathematical Model (continued) •The total amount of steel used during monthly production equals: (steel required per unit of product 1) x (monthly production of product 1) + (steel required per unit of product 2) x (monthly production of product 2) = a1x1 + a2x2 This quantity must be less than or equal to the allocated b pounds of steel: a1x1 + a2x2 < b
  • 39. 39 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc.  Mathematical Model (continued) •The monthly production level of product 1 must be greater than or equal to m : x1 > m •The monthly production level of product 2 must be less than or equal to u : x2 < u •However, the production level for product 2 cannot be negative: x2 > 0
  • 40. 40 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc.  Mathematical Model Summary Max p1x1 + p2x2 s.t. a1x1 + a2x2 < b x1 > m x2 < u x2 > 0 Objectiv e Function “Subject to” Constraint s
  • 41. 41 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc.  Question: Suppose b = 2000, a1 = 2, a2 = 3, m = 60, u = 720, p1 = 100, p2 = 200. Rewrite the model with these specific values for the uncontrollable inputs.
  • 42. 42 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc.  Answer: Substituting, the model is: Max 100x1 + 200x2 s.t. 2x1 + 3x2 < 2000 x1 > 60 x2 < 720 x2 > 0
  • 43. 43 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc.  Question: The optimal solution to the current model is x1 = 60 and x2 = 626 2/3. If the product were engines, explain why this is not a true optimal solution for the "real-life" problem.  Answer: One cannot produce and sell 2/3 of an engine. Thus the problem is further restricted by the fact that both x1 and x2 must be integers. (They could remain fractions if it is assumed these fractions are work in progress to be completed the next month.)
  • 44. 44 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Iron Works, Inc. Uncontrollable Inputs $100 profit per unit Prod. 1 $200 profit per unit Prod. 2 2 lbs. steel per unit Prod. 1 3 lbs. Steel per unit Prod. 2 2000 lbs. steel allocated 60 units minimum Prod. 1 720 units maximum Prod. 2 0 units minimum Prod. 2 60 units Prod. 1 626.67 units Prod. 2 Controllable Inputs Profit = $131,333.33 Steel Used = 2000 Output Mathematical Model Max 100(60) + 200(626.67) s.t. 2(60) + 3(626.67) < 2000 60 > 60 626.67 < 720 626.67 > 0
  • 45. 45 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp. Ponderosa Development Corporation (PDC) is a small real estate developer that builds only one style house. The selling price of the house is $115,000. Land for each house costs $55,000 and lumber, supplies, and other materials run another $28,000 per house. Total labor costs are approximately $20,000 per house.
  • 46. 46 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp. Ponderosa leases office space for $2,000 per month. The cost of supplies, utilities, and leased equipment runs another $3,000 per month. The one salesperson of PDC is paid a commission of $2,000 on the sale of each house. PDC has seven permanent office employees whose monthly salaries are given on the next slide.
  • 47. 47 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp. Employee Monthly Salary President $10,000 VP, Development 6,000 VP, Marketing 4,500 Project Manager 5,500 Controller 4,000 Office Manager 3,000 Receptionist 2,000
  • 48. 48 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Question: Identify all costs and denote the marginal cost and marginal revenue for each house.  Answer: The monthly salaries total $35,000 and monthly office lease and supply costs total another $5,000. This $40,000 is a monthly fixed cost. The total cost of land, material, labor, and sales commission per house, $105,000, is the marginal cost for a house. The selling price of $115,000 is the marginal revenue per house.
  • 49. 49 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Question: Write the monthly cost function c (x), revenue function r (x), and profit function p (x).  Answer: c (x) = variable cost + fixed cost = 105,000x + 40,000 r (x) = 115,000x p (x) = r (x) - c (x) = 10,000x - 40,000
  • 50. 50 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Question: What is the breakeven point for monthly sales of the houses?  Answer: r (x ) = c (x ) 115,000x = 105,000x + 40,000 Solving, x = 4.
  • 51. 51 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Question: What is the monthly profit if 12 houses per month are built and sold?  Answer: p (12) = 10,000(12) - 40,000 = $80,000 monthly profit
  • 52. 52 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Houses Sold (x) Thousands of Dollars Break-Even Point = 4 Houses Total Cost = 40,000 + 105,000x Total Revenue = 115,000x
  • 53. 53 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Management Science Techniques  Linear Programming  Integer Linear Programming  PERT/CPM  Inventory Models  Waiting Line Models  Simulation  Decision Analysis  Goal Programming  Analytic Hierarchy Process  Forecasting  Markov-Process Models  Dynamic Programming
  • 54. 54 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved The Management Scientist Software  12 Modules
  • 55. 55 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Using Excel for Breakeven Analysis  A spreadsheet software package such as Microsoft Excel can be used to perform a quantitative analysis of Ponderosa Development Corporation.  We will enter the problem data in the top portion of the spreadsheet.  The bottom of the spreadsheet will be used for model development.
  • 56. 56 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Formula Spreadsheet A B 1 PROBLEM DATA 2 Fixed Cost $40,000 3 Variable Cost Per Unit $105,000 4 Selling Price Per Unit $115,000 5 MODEL 6 Sales Volume 7 Total Revenue =B4*B6 8 Total Cost =B2+B3*B6 9 Total Profit (Loss) =B7-B8
  • 57. 57 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Question What is the monthly profit if 12 houses are built and sold per month?
  • 58. 58 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Spreadsheet Solution A B 1 PROBLEM DATA 2 Fixed Cost $40,000 3 Variable Cost Per Unit $105,000 4 Selling Price Per Unit $115,000 5 MODEL 6 Sales Volume 12 7 Total Revenue $1,380,000 8 Total Cost $1,300,000 9 Total Profit (Loss) $80,000
  • 59. 59 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Question: What is the breakeven point for monthly sales of the houses?  Spreadsheet Solution: •One way to determine the break-even point using a spreadsheet is to use the Goal Seek tool. •Microsoft Excel ‘s Goal Seek tool allows the user to determine the value for an input cell that will cause the output cell to equal some specified value. •In our case, the goal is to set Total Profit to zero by seeking an appropriate value for Sales Volume.
  • 60. 60 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Spreadsheet Solution: Goal Seek Approach Using Excel ’s Goal Seek Tool Step 1: Select the Tools menu Step 2: Choose the Goal Seek option Step 3: When the Goal Seek dialog box appears: Enter B9 in the Set cell box Enter 0 in the To value box Enter B6 in the By changing cell box Click OK
  • 61. 61 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Spreadsheet Solution: Goal Seek Approach Completed Goal Seek Dialog Box
  • 62. 62 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Example: Ponderosa Development Corp.  Spreadsheet Solution: Goal Seek Approach A B 1 PROBLEM DATA 2 Fixed Cost $40,000 3 Variable Cost Per Unit $105,000 4 Selling Price Per Unit $115,000 5 MODEL 6 Sales Volume 4 7 Total Revenue $460,000 8 Total Cost $460,000 9 Total Profit (Loss) $0
  • 63. 63 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Management Science Revolution  According to Irv Lustig of ILOG Inc., solution methods developed today are 10, 000 times faster than the ones used 15 years ago.  Quantitative methods are especially helpful with large, complex problems. For example, in the coordination of thousands of tasks associated with landing Apollo 11 safely on the moon, quantitative techniques helped to ensure that more than 300, 000 pieces of work performed by more than 400,000 people were integrated smoothly.  Herbert A. Simon, a Nobel Prize winner in economics and an expert in decision making, said that a mathematical model does not have to be exact; it just has to be close enough to provide better results than can be obtained by common sense.
  • 64. 64 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved End of Chapter 1