This document discusses student evaluation methods using outcome-based learning as mandated by the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) and National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) in India. It outlines 12 graduate attributes that course outcomes must map to. Faculty members are responsible for drafting course outcomes and mapping them to the graduate attributes and syllabus. Exams must also map questions to course outcomes, with no choice and ensuring all outcomes are addressed. Student performance is analyzed against targets for percentages achieving certain marks. Analysis includes mapping exam performance to outcomes and attributes.
Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6, Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...
Student evaluation using outcome based learning
1. Student evaluation using Outcome
Based Learning (NBA / NAAC)
Prof. (Dr.) Vinay Kumar Chandna
Principal JECRC
2/06/2021 1
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
2. Outcome Based Education in India
National Board of Accreditation is
ensuring the quality education in
India through the process stated by
Washington Accord. (for programs)
2/06/2021 2
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
3. Quality assurance through
National Assessment and
Accreditation Council (NAAC) for
universities / institutions
2/06/2021 3
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
6. 1. Domain knowledge: Apply the
knowledge of mathematics,
science, engineering / medical /
law / hotel management /
agriculture / etc. their
fundamentals, and specialization to
the solution of complex problems.
2/06/2021 6
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
7. Complex problem:
ability to approach them from
multiple, sometimes competing,
perspectives and which may have
multiple possible solutions.
2/06/2021 7
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
8. 2. Problem analysis: Identify,
formulate, research literature, and
analyze complex problems
reaching substantiated
conclusions.
2/06/2021 8
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
9. 3. Design/development of solutions:
Design solutions for complex problems
and design system components or
processes that meet the specified
needs with appropriate consideration
for the public health and safety, and
the cultural, societal, and
environmental considerations.
2/06/2021 9
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
10. 4. Conduct investigations of
complex problems: Use research-
based knowledge and research
methods including design, analysis
and interpretation and synthesis of
the information to provide valid
conclusions.
2/06/2021 10
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
11. 5. Modern tool usage: Create,
select, and apply appropriate
techniques, resources, and modern
tools including prediction and
modeling to complex activities with
an understanding of the
limitations.
2/06/2021 11
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
12. 6. The society: Apply reasoning
informed by the contextual
knowledge to assess societal,
health, safety, legal and cultural
issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the
professional practice.
2/06/2021 12
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
13. 7. Environment and sustainability:
Understand the impact of the
solutions in societal and
environmental contexts, and
demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable
development.
2/06/2021 13
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
14. 8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles
and commit to professional ethics
and responsibilities and norms of
the practice.
2/06/2021 14
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
15. 9. Individual team work: Function
effectively as an individual, and as
a member or leader in diverse
teams, and in multidisciplinary
settings
2/06/2021 15
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
16. 10. Communication: Communicate
effectively on complex activities with
the professional community and with
society at large, such as, being able to
comprehend and write effective
reports and design documentation,
make effective presentations, and give
and receive clear instructions.
2/06/2021 16
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
17. 11. Project management and finance:
Demonstrate knowledge and
understanding of the professional
knowledge and management
principles and apply these to one’s
own work, as a member and leader in
a team, to manage projects and in
multidisciplinary environments.
2/06/2021 17
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
18. 12. Life-long learning: Recognize
the need for, and have the
preparation and ability to engage
in independent and life-long
learning in the broadest context of
technological change.
2/06/2021 18
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
19. 12 attributes are to be mapped
with Course Outcomes
2/06/2021 19
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
21. Course Learning Outcomes are
statements clearly describing the
meaningful, observable and
measurable knowledge, skills
and/or dispositions students will
learn in this course.
2/06/2021 21
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
22. How to draft Course Outcomes?
2/06/2021 22
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
27. Compare Course outcomes with
the syllabus provided by the
university and feedbacks received
from Alumni & Employer to discuss
content beyond.
2/06/2021 27
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
29. Who will draft CO and Mapping?
2/06/2021 29
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
30. All the faculty members of the
concerned department / program
2/06/2021 30
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
31. NAME OF FACULTY
SUBJECT / CODE
ΣMAPPING
0-1:1, 1-2:2, 1-3:3
GA
1
GA
2
GA
3
GA
4
GA
5
GA
6
GA
7
GA
8
GA
9
GA
10
GA
11
GA
12
CO1
CO2
CO3
CO4
CO5
2/06/2021 31
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
32. Mapping CO1 and GA1
Faculty-1 3
Faculty-2 2
Faculty-3 3
Faculty-4 2
Faculty-5 1
average 2.2
Final Mapping 3
2/06/2021 32
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
34. Each question is to be mapped
with Course Outcome
There should not be any choice in
the paper and if any then it must
be between the questions of same
Course outcome.
2/06/2021 34
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
35. SOVE ANY FIVE QUESTION?
NO BALANCE?
Q1 CO1
Q2 CO2
Q3 CO3
Q4 CO4
Q5 CO5
Q6 CO3
Q7 CO2
2/06/2021 35
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
36. MM: 25
NO CHOICE
All COs are to be addressed
Marks
Q1 CO1 5
Q2 CO2 5
Q3 CO3 5
OR Q4 CO3 5
Q5 CO4 5
Q6 CO5 5
OR Q7 CO5 5
2/06/2021 36
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
37. Set Target?
80% students
getting more than
80% Marks
80% students
getting more than
70% Marks
80% students
getting more than
60% Marks
70% students
getting more than
70% Marks
70% students
getting more than
70% Marks
70% students
getting more than
60% Marks
60% students
getting more than
80% Marks
60% students
getting more than
70% Marks
60% students
getting more than
60% Marks
2/06/2021 37
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
38. Let the target is 60 % students are
getting more than 60% marks with
individual target is also 60%
2/06/2021 38
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna
39. Analysis
Sub-1 Sub-2 Sub-3
Student-1 20 20
Student-2 10 22
Student-3 15 21
Student-4 10 10
Avg 50%
students
getting
more
than 60%
Not
Acheived
75%
students
are
getting
more
than 60%
marks
Mapping
with GA
1.5 3
2/06/2021 39
Prof. Vinay Kumar Chandna