BrightonSEO 2014 - Localizing SEO Performance
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

BrightonSEO 2014 - Localizing SEO Performance

  • 4,844 views
Uploaded on

This is my BrightonSEO 2014 presentation. It covers a unique case study on the local performance of Geico for auto insurance keywords.

This is my BrightonSEO 2014 presentation. It covers a unique case study on the local performance of Geico for auto insurance keywords.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
4,844
On Slideshare
1,985
From Embeds
2,859
Number of Embeds
14

Actions

Shares
Downloads
50
Comments
0
Likes
7

Embeds 2,859

http://heartrobot.org.uk 1,697
http://www.siliconbeachtraining.co.uk 916
https://twitter.com 119
http://www.scoop.it 92
http://feeds.feedburner.com 9
http://plus.url.google.com 8
http://t.co 4
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 4
http://news.google.com 3
https://www.linkedin.com 2
http://54.229.152.112 2
http://www.www.siliconbeachtraining.co.uk 1
http://www.slideee.com 1
http://feedly.com 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. LOCALIZING SEO PERFORMANCE To develop a winning SEO strategy
  • 2. Rob Bucci Founder, CEO
  • 3. @STATrob #BrightonSEO
  • 4. LOCALIZATION & SEO
  • 5. LOCALIZATION, WHAT? The move towards SERPs that are modified by the location where the query is performed. @STATrob
  • 6. WE’RE CURIOUS. How does localization impact searcher behaviour? @STATrob
  • 7. HOW DO PEOPLE MODIFY THEIR SEARCH QUERIES TO FIND LOCAL SERVICES? @STATrob
  • 8. HOW DO PEOPLE SEARCH FOR LOCAL SERVICES THAT AREN’T BRICK-AND-MORTAR? @STATrob
  • 9. HOW DOES SEARCHER BEHAVIOUR CHANGE STATE-TO- STATE? @STATrob
  • 10. ULTIMATELY, THE QUESTION IS: How can localized analysis help us to build better SEO strategies? @STATrob
  • 11. SO, WE DID A CASE STUDY. On one of the largest providers of auto insurance in America. @STATrob
  • 12. REVENUE (2012): $16.74 BILLION
  • 13. INSURANCE IS A BIG BUSINESS. @STATrob
  • 14. VEHICLES INSURED BY GEICO IN THE UNITED STATES. 20 MILLION @STATrob
  • 15. THE DATA SET
  • 16. WE PICKED A BASIC SET OF 33 SHORT-TAIL QUERIES. 33 KEYWORDS @STATrob
  • 17. SEARCH VOLUME > 100 • auto insurance • cheap auto insurance • auto insurance quotes @STATrob
  • 18. WE USED 5 DIFFERENT TYPES OF GEO-MODIFICATION. 5 VARIANTS @STATrob
  • 19. GEO-MODIFICATION? Modifying a query with a place-name. For example [auto insurance] becomes [california auto insurance]. @STATrob
  • 20. UNMODIFIED Example: [auto insurance] @STATrob
  • 21. SUFFIX Example: [auto insurance california] @STATrob
  • 22. PREFIX Example: [california auto insurance] @STATrob
  • 23. FOR SUFFIX Example: [auto insurance for california] @STATrob
  • 24. IN SUFFIX Example: [auto insurance in california] @STATrob
  • 25. 33 KEYWORDS MULTIPLIED BY 5 VARIANTS GAVE US 165 QUERIES TO TRACK. 165 QUERIES @STATrob
  • 26. WE TRACKED EACH SET OF 165 QUERIES WITHIN EACH STATE. Example: [california auto insurance] tracked on a california localized SERP. @STATrob
  • 27. 33 SHORT-TAIL KEYWORDS MULTIPLIED BY 5 VARIANTS ACROSS 51 U.S LOCALES. 8,415 QUERIES @STATrob
  • 28. WE COLLECTED THE FOLLOWING DATA • Geico’s organic ranking • local search volume (localized to the state) • advertiser competition • cost-per-click @STATrob
  • 29. WE CREATED A WEIGHTED RANKING SCORE. Based on organic ranking and search volume. The score indicates the relative value of a ranking. @STATrob
  • 30. RANKING WEIGHTS Rank Weight 1 1.0 2 0.9 3 0.8 4 0.7 5 0.6 … … 10 0.1
  • 31. SIMPLE MULTIPLICATION Ranking weight x search volume = ranking score @STATrob
  • 32. EXAMPLE: RANKING #2 WITH SEARCH VOLUME OF 6,600 Ranking of 2 = weight of 0.9
 0.9 x 6,600 = ranking score of 5,940 @STATrob
  • 33. SO, WHAT DID WE LEARN? @STATrob
  • 34. QUERY STRUCTURE
  • 35. TOTAL SEARCH VOLUME Unmodified Suffix Prefix In Suffix For Suffix 0 75,000 150,000 225,000 300,000 30 8,650 10,730 18,530 251,430
  • 36. UNMODIFIED QUERIES WIN. Most searchers don’t geo-modify queries for local services without a brick-and-mortar location. @STATrob
  • 37. AVERAGE COST-PER-CLICK Unmodified Suffix Prefix In Suffix For Suffix $0.00 $12.50 $25.00 $37.50 $50.00 $0.11 $5.08 $5.46 $7.15 $46.06
  • 38. UNMODIFIED QUERIES ARE EXPENSIVE. The average CPC of a unmodified queries is commensurate with their total search volume @STATrob
  • 39. GEICO’S TOTAL RANKING SCORE Unmodified Suffix Prefix In Suffix For Suffix 0 75,000 150,000 225,000 300,000 30 8,650 10,730 18,530 251,430 18 2,522 4,575 8,889 104,705
  • 40. UNMODIFIED QUERIES DRIVE GEICO’S ORGANIC TRAFFIC. It’s clear that the majority of Geico’s SEO traffic comes from unmodified searches. @STATrob
  • 41. QUERY STRUCTURE MAKES A DIFFERENCE. @STATrob
  • 42. WHAT DOES THIS TEACH US? Based on the previous data, one could use a PPC channel to drive a small wedge into Geico’s business. @STATrob
  • 43. BUT, WE’RE ALL ABOUT SEO. When we break out the data into state-by-state markets, we can spot cracks in their armour. @STATrob
  • 44. MARKETS MATTER
  • 45. BUT NOT ALL MARKETS 0 200 400 600 800 Alaska North Dakota Vermont 201 261 340 630 590 700 Total Search Volume Total Ranking Score
  • 46. FOUR MARKETS MATTER. California, Florida, Texas & Michigan are Geico’s major source of organic traffic for auto insurance terms. @STATrob
  • 47. TOTAL SEARCH VOLUME & RANKING SCORE 0 12,500 25,000 37,500 50,000 California Florida Texas Michigan 9,798 13,62815,138 18,816 16,870 31,04029,070 40,580 Total Search Volume Total Ranking Score
  • 48. TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% California Florida Texas Michigan 58% 44% 52% 46%
  • 49. DON’T TRY TO COMPETE IN THESE MARKETS. Granted, they don’t have anything close to 100% coverage, but why chase them? @STATrob
  • 50. “I SKATE TO WHERE THE PUCK IS GOING TO BE, NOT WHERE IT HAS BEEN.” -Wayne Gretzky @STATrob
  • 51. LOOK TO THE MARKETS THEY’RE MISSING. @STATrob
  • 52. THREE OVERLOOKED MARKETS 0 3,500 7,000 10,500 14,000 New York Illinois Washington 7472,0411,445 6,180 10,720 12,370 Total Search Volume Total Ranking Score
  • 53. TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% New York Illinois Washington 12% 19% 12%
  • 54. THE DEMAND IS THERE, BUT THEY LACK COVERAGE. @STATrob
  • 55. HOW DO WE FORM A STRATEGY AROUND THIS INSIGHT? If we’re going to compete with Geico, we should first challenge them where they’re weak. @STATrob
  • 56. SUMMING IT ALL UP
  • 57. QUERY STRUCTURE MATTERS. Make sure you understand how people are searching for your products/services. @STATrob
  • 58. EVERYTHING IS LOCAL. Even searches that aren’t geo-modified are impacted by localization. @STATrob
  • 59. LOCALIZED ANALYSIS EXPOSES OPPORTUNITIES. By going deeper, you can find areas your competition is missing. @STATrob
  • 60. EVEN THE BIG GUYS HAVE EXPLOITABLE WEAKNESSES. @STATrob
  • 61. YOU CAN DO ALL THIS RESEARCH ON YOUR OWN. You just need partners who can provide the data. @STATrob
  • 62. STAY TUNED FOR MORE! @STATrob
  • 63. rob@getSTAT.com @STATrob