1. The pdf of your paper in A Stitch in Time: Essays in Honour of Lise Bender JĂžrgensen may
not be published on the Internet until three years from publication (June 2017), unless the site
is a limited access intranet (password protected).
2. i
A Stitch in Time
Essays in Honour of Lise Bender JĂžrgensen
3. ii
GOTHENBURG UNIVERSITY
Department of Historical Studies
GOTARC SERIES A. GOTHENBURG ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES
ISSN1403-8293
No 4. A Stitch in Time: Essays in Honour of Lise Bender JĂžrgensen
Red. Sophie Bergerbrant and SĂžlvi Helene FossĂžy
Printing: Reprocentralen, Humanities Department, Gothenburg University, 2014
Layout: Rich Potter
Cover: Rich Potter
ISBN 978-91-85245-56-9
4. iii
Preface
he idea for this festschrift began with Antointte Rast-Eicher, who compiled
the list of contributors and participated in the early stages of producing the
volume. Unfortunately she was unable to contribute to the main work with
the volume due to other commitments. However, we want to thank her for her
initiative.
his book could not have been printed without the inancial support from
Sparebanken Midt-Norges gavefond til Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskaplige
Universitet; Department of Historical Studies, Gothenburg University and the
Department of Historical Studies, Norwegian University of Technology and
Science. Dr Kristin Bornholdt Collins consulted on language-related issues and
assisted with proofreading and revision, and we are grateful for all her help
and language support through the various stages of producing the book. We
would also like to thank Ragnhild Berge for helping us in Trondheim; Lena
Hammarlund for consultations on terminology; Ulla Mannering for tracking
down photographs of Lise; and Karina Grömer for providing an excellent
opportunity to present the book.
here is no Tabula Gratulatore in this book; this is due to Liseâs vast network
of colleagues and friends within so many ields and countries. How could we
possibly reach them all, and where would the line be drawn? It therefore seemed
preferable to concentrate on the actual content, and to produce a worthy tribute
honouring Lise for decades of hard work and her important role as a pioneer in
textile research. It comes with heartfelt gratitude, admiration and best wishes
from all of her colleagues and friends, naming none but including all.
With this festschrift, the editors, authors, colleagues, friends and all the
individuals at supporting institutions wish Professor Lise Bender JĂžrgensen a
somewhat belated Happy 65th
Birthday. he opportunity to present the book at
the 2014 NESAT conference was too good to be missed.
Gothenburg and Drammen, 2014-03-03
6. v
A Stitch in Time
Sophie Bergerbrant
vii
he red thread
Lotte Hedeager
xi
Lise Bender JĂžrgensen: research in textiles
Antoinette Rast-Eicher
xv
Bibliography of Lise Bender JĂžrgensenâs publications
Antoinette Rast-Eicher and SĂžlvi Helene FossĂžy
xix
Science, heory, Methodology and Prehistoric Textiles
Experimental soil burial studies for archaeological textile preservation and research
â a review
Elizabeth E. Peacock
1
Implications of a web - considerations of a crat-oriented research perspective
Ulla Isabel Zagal-Mach Wolfe
23
Speciality ibres for special textiles
Antoinette Rast-Eicher
43
Prehistoric textile patterns: transfer with obstruction
Johanna Banck-Burgess
63
A rich seam: stitching as a means of interpreting Bronze Age textile fragments
SĂžlvi Helene FossĂžy
77
Tacit knowledge and the interpretation of archaeological tablet-woven textiles
Lise RĂŠder Knudsen
91
he holistic nature of textile knowledge: fulling cloth in the sea
Carol Christiansen & Lena Hammarlund
111
Social Aspects of Prehistoric Textiles
Out of the dark⊠New textile inds from Hallstatt
Karina Grömer, Helga Rösel-Mautendorfer and Hans Reschreiter
129
Contents
7. vi
Italian textiles from prehistory to Late Antique times
Margarita Gleba
145
Wool fabrics from Arditurri Roman mines, Oiartzun (Basque Country, Spain)
C. Alfaro Giner
171
A well-preserved household textile from Roman Egypt
Hero Granger-Taylor and Karen Finch
189
hrough Roman eyes: cotton textiles from Early Historic India
John-Peter Wild and Felicity Wild
209
Tools of textile production in Roman Iron Age burials and settlements on Funen,
Denmark
Sophie Bergerbrant
Cloth, clothing and Anglo-Saxon women
Penelope Walton Rogers
237
253
he textile interior in the Oseberg burial chamber
Marianne Vedeler
281
An exceptional woman from Birka
Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
301
2/2 Herringbone twill fabrics in Early Medieval Poland: Imports or local production?
Maria Cybulska and Jerzy Maik
Textiles of iteenth- to seventeenth-century layers from Heidelberg and Kempten,
Germany
Klaus Tidow, Textilingenieur, Boostedt
317
331
1
8. 301
An exceptional woman from Birka
Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering,
Copenhagen University
Introduction
Archaeological textile research is a constantly evolving ield of research, and
in this book and present article we honour Lise Bender JĂžrgensen, one of
the key researchers in North European textile research. he impact of her
impressive scholarly contributions during a lifetime spent in Danish, Swedish
and Norwegian universities cannot be underestimated. Lise Bender JĂžrgensen
is a true pioneer. She has introduced new standards and parameters for textile
research, and in both her academic research and career has crossed the modern
geographical borders that too often restrict true interdisciplinary and cross-
cultural studies. hrough the numerous excellent examples of textile analyses
and methodologies published by Lise Bender JĂžrgensen an entire generation
has been taught how to conduct archaeological textile research. he present
authors have collaborated with Lise Bender JĂžrgensen in a variety of ways,
most importantly in 2006 when Lise Bender JĂžrgensen was guest professor at
the Danish National Research Foundationâs Centre for Textile Research (CTR)
in its irst year.
One of the highly crucial results that has emerged from the research conducted
at CTR since 2005 is the increased focus on how scientiic analysis can widen
our perspectives of past technologies. Textile research is not merely the study
of actual textile remains but covers all aspects of manufacture from producing
the raw material of both skin and ibres to the inal products, as well as
examining iconography and literary sources with the help of theoretical and
methodological perspectives. In this article we explore textiles from Viking Age
Birka, an important trading and craft production centre that is considered to
be one of Scandinaviaâs earliest towns, in order to demonstrate the potential of
textile research when applied to a material utilizing diferent approaches.
Textiles and Birka
Birka is well known among textile scholars. Analyses of the approximately 4800
preserved textile fragments by Agnes Geijer and Inga HĂ€gg yielded unique
knowledge of Viking Age costumes as well as textile raw materials, techniques
and manufacture (e.g. Geijer 1938, 1965, 1980; HĂ€gg 1974, 1984, 1986).
he textiles from Birka are primarily found in burials like the rich chamber
graves. Although only a minor part of the preserved textiles have been hitherto
analysed, they represent an invaluable source of information about Viking Age
9. Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
302
textiles in Scandinavia. hus, the analyses have demonstrated textiles made
using various techniques and in qualities ranging from very coarse to exclusive
fabrics created using complicated techniques and with many threads per
centimetre. he materials used were primarily wool and lax, but new materials
like silk, gold and silver threads were also utilized. A remarkable characteristic of
the high quality textiles that Birka is renowned for is that they have a uniform
standard in regard to material and manufacture. Until recently it was believed
among textile scholars that no organized textile production took place in Birka
(Geijer 2006; Bender JĂžrgensen 1986: 168). Where the textiles were produced
and imported from has been discussed on numerous occasions over the years
(e.g. Geijer 1938, 1965, 1980; Hald 1980; Hofmann 1964; Ingstad 1980; HĂ€gg
1974, 1984, 1986; Bender JĂžrgensen 1986, 1987). However, a study of the c.
2500 preserved textile tools, primarily from the settlement area (also called the
Black Earth) contradicts those assumptions. he analyses of the textile tools,
e.g. spindle whorls, loom weights and needles indicates that textile production
in Birka was extensive and varied. Although imported textiles and raw materials
also occur, the inhabitants of Birka produced many diferent types of textiles,
from the most exclusive cloths to coarser fabrics. his is clearly contrary to
the previous assumption that indigenous textile production in Birka comprised
only coarse wool cloth of poor quality. hus, it is evident that the people of
Birka possessed tools for making all the types of wool and linen cloth found in
the graves (Andersson 2003; Andersson Strand 2011).
EvenifthetextilesfromBirkaarewellknowntotextileresearchers,thetextileshave
rarely been placed in a wider context and discussed from a general archaeological
perspective. he graves represent a population of young and old, men and women
and together with the textiles they can provide crucial information to enhance
our knowledge of Viking Age society and also the lives of individuals at the time.
According to Ann-Soie GrĂ€slund âIdeology can be explained as a conscious,
coherent view of life and society whereas mentality could be explained as a set
of unconscious, or perhaps conscious but unarticulated attitudes and values
common for a society or a group of peopleâ (GrĂ€slund 2001:142). Furthermore,
she considers ideology to be relatively connected to class identity while
mentalities concern everybody (GrÀslund 2001: 11). Additionally, a burial
custom can be characterized as part of a grave language and signiicant for the
persona of the dead but also an activator of norms and values, memories and
traditions, networking and regeneration, as well as religion and mentality in
everydaylife(Jennbert1988,2006).Materialculturealwayscontainsameaning
andthegraveisakindofmontageoflifestyleattributesandaritualizationofthe
dead within the landscape of the nearby farms and villages. hese aspects will
be considered below where the woman buried in Birka grave 943 is considered.
In order to discover more about her we will combine knowledge from context
analyses obtained from the study of the preserved textiles and information
gleaned from the other objects from this special and rich grave.
11. Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
304
Raw materials, such as salt and amber were imported while iron and fur were
exported. In the later phase, it is evident that Birkaâs structure and role had
undergonechange.henetworkbecamemoreextensiveandtradingexpeditions
reached far to the East, for example, to Kiev and Constantinople, and trade
with silver, slaves and prestige items grew in prominence (Ambrosiani 2005).
his extensive organization must have required a structure that included rich
and powerful traders and their families with contact with to other traders in
contemporarytowns.Evenifthekingsandchieftainscontinuedtobeinluential
in the MĂ€lar Valley, it has been suggested that in fact it was the trading families
who possessed real power in the town, and it is likely that Birka became more
autonomous in the late phase (Hedenstierna-Jonson 2012: 214-215).
he Birka settlement consisted of diferent types of buildings, e.g. longhouses,
but more commonly smaller houses (8x5 m) with, in general, two rooms. he
larger room was used as living quarters with a ireplace while the smaller room
was often used as a workshop or a booth. Plots were laid out throughout the
town and these houses were adjusted to this plan (Ambrosiani 2012: 16). In the
tenth century, around AD 950, the town had expanded to such an extent that
a new rampart was built outside an older one. here was a fort and a garrison
Fig. 2 Map of Björkö and Birka (Ater Ambrosiani & Erikson 1992).
12. An exceptional woman from Birka
305
area alongside the settlement area (Fig. 2). his area was also surrounded
with a rampart and had several building phases (Holmquist Olausson 2001;
Zachrisson 2011, 2012). Evidence for textile production comes from the entire
settlement area, including the garrison, and in all periods, although no direct
evidence for textile workshops has hitherto been found (Andersson 2003).
In the early phase the population of Birka has been estimated to a couple of
hundred, while more than 1000 individuals lived there in the later phase. he
social structure of the Birka population has also been discussed by several
scholars (e.g. GrÀslund 1980; HÀgg 1984; Hedenstierna-Jonson 2012) and
according to Rimbertâs statement there were chieftains, rich merchants,
craftspeople, ordinary people and slaves in Birka. GrÀslund sums up her analysis
of the graves by observing that, âhe other chamber graves demonstrate by their
construction that the deceased belonged to a high social stratum. It is likely that
all these were burials of chieftains and their families as well as merchants, either
local or from other Scandinavian areas or from countries outside Scandinaviaâ
(GrÀslund 1980:86).
he number of graves outside the settlement area have been estimated to
between 2300 (GrÀslund 1980:4) to 3000 (Ambrosiani & Clarke 1992:73).
Furthermore, several of the burials are double graves containing more than one
person. Around 1160 graves have been excavated, comprising 556 cremation
gravesand119chambergraves,withtherestbeinginhumationgraves(GrÀslund
1980:27, 50). he grave goods in several burials attest to great wealth. he
identiication of gender is diicult due to the lack of human remains and only
in 416 graves has the gender of the deceased been archaeologically identiied.
Of these, 58% of the inhumation graves and 61% of the cremation graves were
female (GrÀslund 1980:82).
Grave 943
Grave 943 was a large chamber grave, 2.15 x 1.6 m, located in the largest grave
ield, Hemlanden, on Björkö (Arbman 1943) (Fig. 3). he majority of the graves
were situated outside the rampart. However, some graves were found under
the rampart (dated to a period before the rampart was built) while others were
placed inside the rampart. Among the latter is a group of chamber graves dated
to Birkaâs late phase. Regrettably, it is not known where grave 943 was situated
because the grave is not marked on nineteenth-century excavation plans,
but it has been suggested that it might have been located inside the rampart
(Kyhlberg 1980).
he chamber was oriented W. + 5° - S. + E. +5° N and the grave has been
archaeologically dated to the tenth century. he grave was excavated by Hjalmar
Stolpe in the second half of the nineteenth century, and according to his notes,
there were no visible marks above ground at the time of the excavation. Nothing
13. Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
306
Fig. 3 Plan of Grave 943 (Ater Arbman 1943, Abb. 318).
of the skeleton was preserved at the time of excavation and it is therefore not
possible toidentifyitsgender.However,the type of objects in the grave, especially
the jewellery, e.g. the oval brooches and necklace, indicate that it is a female burial
and we have therefore decided to refer to the deceased as a woman.
Some of her jewellery has a practical function for use in dress while other pieces
are more decorative (Table 1). One noteworthy example is the necklace with
19 beads and several pendants. he diferent types of beads are all of excellent
quality and made of materials such as glass, amber, silver and gold foil. Five
pendants made of two coins and three oriental mounts were also parts of the
necklace. During the Viking Age, it was not unusual for coins to be transformed
from monetary objects into ornaments such as pendants, and the coins
from this grave indicate both eastern and western contacts (Arbman 1943;
Arwidsson 1989). Other possible items from the grave are a wooden bowl with
silver mounts and a small chest and four spurs.
Diferent types of crafts are represented through the objects in the grave. he
knife is a multifunctional tool used in everyday life, while the scissors and the
needle box indicate some kind of textile production. It is not likely that the
pair of scissors, since it is quite small, was used for shearing sheep, but it could
have been used for cutting fabrics. he ine needles that could have been kept
14. An exceptional woman from Birka
307
in the needle box must have been used for sewing ine fabrics. hus, these
tools are primarily related to production of garments rather than production
of textiles. he items from a small bag, such as amber pendants, raw amber
stones and iron awls indicate knowledge of amber carving. he amber may have
been imported or brought to Birka by the woman herself. Perhaps she herself
worked with amber and produced pendants and beads, although they could
also represent something else, for example trade. However, the combination
of objects clearly indicates production and not just a connection to trade or
exchange. It is certainly plausible that the woman also actively participated in
trade during the Viking Age (Stalsberg 1991:79). he weights, and perhaps also
the fragment of a Dirham coin, support this interpretation, and it is likely that
the woman in grave 943 was a trader or held a powerful position in one of the
trading houses/families based in Birka.
1. Two oval brooches, double shell, bronze gilded with gold and silver (3.1).
2. Two disc brooches â bronze, gilded with gold and decorated with zoomorphic ornaments
(3.2 and 3.3).
3. Several small pendants (318.4): two Scandinavian coins (a Birka coin and a Hedeby half-brac-
teate), a piece of glass from a beaker wrapped in silver wire and 3 heart-shaped oriental
mounts that have been reshaped into pendants.
4. 19 beads made of e.g. glass, gold foil, silver foil and amber (3.5).
5. Two oriental silver mounts gilded with gold.
6. Two round silver pendants gilded with gold decorated with iligree and granulation.
7. A fragment of a wooden bowl with a silver mount (3.7).
8. A possible leather or textile bag (only fragments of bronze mount are preserved) with amber
pendants shaped as a horâs hammer, a schist pendant, amber beads, raw amber stones, iron
awl and a small iron ring.
9. A pair of iron scissors (3.9).
10. A penannular brooch.
11. A (fragmented) leather purse with silver mounts with a Œ of a Samanid dirham struck by
Ahmad ibn Ismail II dated to 907/8-911/12 (295-299 n.), a western European silver coin (?),
a glass bead.
12. Four weights, two of iron and two of bronze of which one has a cubo-octahedral shape.
13. A needle box of bronze (3.15).
14. A whetstone (3.18).
15. Two iron knives (3.19 and 3.22), one with fragments of a leather case.
16. Two iron lock mountings (3.12) with a small part of preserved wood.
17. A glass bead (318.13).
18. Four iron spurs (318.20).
19. An iron fragment (318.21).
In the NE part of the grave at a depth of 0.3 m, some objects were found: a pair of iron scissors, an
iron nail and three iron fragments.
Table 1 he objects from Grave 943 (Arbman 1940, 1943).
16. An exceptional woman from Birka
309
he grave contains textile fragments from at least four diferent textiles in
diferent weaves and materials, as well as a variety of tablet-woven bands and
other decorative elements. hree of the recorded weaves are diferent tabby
textiles; one in linen, another in wool and a third combining both materials
(Table 2). he irst two are balanced weaves with diferent thread counts and
thread thicknesses, and are thus easy to distinguish. he third is a wool rep
weave with a clear imbalance in the thread count. his weave is also unusual as
it has a pattern of parallel diagonal lines applied with a yarn in a contrasting
light colour. his yarn is thicker than the one used for the ground weave and
has previously been identiied as being of lax. he pattern has most likely been
inserted after the weaving of the ground weave, probably with the help of a
needle, as it is only visible on one side of the textile. Both tabbies were located
on top of the large circular brooch, which was placed on the chest below the
oval brooches, indicating that they belonged to outer garments or top covers
in the grave (HĂ€gg 1974:6, 83). he ine linen tabby was identiied by HĂ€gg as
belonging to a pleated undergarment, which is a typical element in the tenth-
century Birka costume tradition (HĂ€gg 1974:16-17). he weave is present in
a mineralized stage on the oval brooches and in several lose lumps of textiles.
Further, it is present on the small disc brooch which was placed between the
oval brooches. his kind of brooch is traditionally interpreted as being utilized
to close a front opening in an undergarment.
Another fabric encountered among the textile fragments from Grave 943 is
a very ine 2/2 wool diamond twill (Table 2), which HĂ€gg also mentions but
does not describe further (HĂ€gg 1974:79-80). Although this kind of weave is
the most frequent type used for overgarments like the strap dress, HĂ€gg does
not record it as belonging to this type of garment. his is probably due to the
lack of any remains of the diamond weave on the back of the oval brooches, the
jewellery that traditionally is known to have fastened the dress. Instead, this
weave is linked to HĂ€ggâs group of other possible costume items, such as tunics
and jackets. Furthermore, HĂ€gg suggests that the diamond twill could have
been sewn to a silk textile also recorded in the grave (HĂ€gg 1974:80) (Table 2).
Textile
Binding
hread
count/cm
hread
diameter/
mm
Twist
direction
warp/wet
Fibre type
based on
Geijer 1938
Geijerâs (1938)
classiication
HĂ€ggâs (1974)
classiication
Tabby 16/20 0.3/0.5 z/z Linen Not recorded Under garment
Tabby 7/4 1.0/1.5 z/s Wool W3 (Taf. 7,4) Blanket
Rep tabby
with pattern
24/7 0.5/0.8 z/s Wool with
linen threads
M7 (Taf. 11,7)
2/2 diamond
twill
16/~38 0.3/0.3 z/z Wool Not recorded Tunic (W10)
he ibre identiications are based on Geijer 1938 and a visual identiication, as ibre samples
could not been taken.
Table 2 Technical description of the diferent weaves in Grave 943.
17. Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
310
During the re-examination of the textile fragments from Grave 943, no seams
joiningthetwodiferenttextileswereidentiied,butcertainlythisinterpretation
cannot be excluded before all textile pieces have been thoroughly examined.
hus, according to HĂ€ggâs interpretation, the diamond twill represents a tunic
worn over the linen undergarment. Compared to the other Birka graves, the
tunic would have been worn under the dress (HĂ€gg 1974:80, 93). Remains of
the diamond weave found on the pair of scissors placed on the pelvis suggests
that this costume item reached at least to the hips.
he silk weave is one of the textiles which is mentioned but not precisely described
inanyofthepreviousanalyses.heweavecanbeclassiiedasasamite,whichcovers
thetechnicaltermweft-facedcompoundtwill(Geijer1938:62-63).Ithasweftloats
over three warps, and a more thorough examination of the weave would possibly
reveal the existence of texture or colour patterns. he warp consists of two parallel
z-twisted threads and the weft of thicker non-twisted single yarns. According to
HĂ€gg this textile could have been part of a decoration placed on the front of the
tunic as it occurs in several other Birka graves (HĂ€gg 1974:80).
Both the diamond twill and the silk weave are connected to at least two diferent
kinds of tablet-woven silk bands with woven-in silver threads (Arbman
1943:366; Geijer 1938:86, 88). he irst is found underneath the largest of the
disc brooches on the chest of the deceased (Geijer 1938:170; HĂ€gg 1974:79-
80). It is not known how long this silk tablet-woven band was when it was
recovered, but today it is broken into several pieces. he largest piece is 1.3 cm
wide and made of approximately 27 tablets, all Z-twisted in the same direction.
he silver thread pattern is very dense and lies only on one side of the band.
A second type of tablet-woven band in silk with silver threads was also located
on the chest in close contact with the large disc brooch. he band has a slightly
diferent pattern with decorative side panels. It measures 0.9 cm in width
and has both Z- and S-twisted tablets. According to drawings and Geijerâs
description (Arbman 1943:366, ig. 318; Geijer 1938:170), a long tablet-woven
band possibly more than 20 cm long was recorded on the pelvis close to the
scissors where the diamond twill was recorded. his band is not recorded by
Geijer or HĂ€gg, and it is uncertain whether it was subsequently lost, or it can
still be located among the textile fragments from Grave 943. Only further
analyses can solve this problem.
Finally, a third kind of tablet-woven band was found at the head of the deceased.
It is 1.0 cm wide and preserved at a length of c. 25 cm. It is made of 17 tablets all
Z-twisted and has 18 wefts per cm. he material is silk with a woven-in pattern
in silver thread. Geijer describes that this band was sewn onto a silk fabric, but
today the textile is barely visible under the band and therefore further details
could not be extracted. It is most likely that the band belonged to a kind of silk
head covering or veil (Geijer 1938: 88; HĂ€gg 1974:79).
19. Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
312
local fashion. On the other hand, the use of oval brooches in connection with a
possible strap dress seems to have been a quite old-fashioned style at this stage.
he new fashion trend in the Late Viking Age period would have comprised a long,
tailored and close-itting two layered dress without the use of brooches, as seen
among the costume fragments from Hedeby, or in several high status graves from
Denmark (Elsner 1989; Hedeager Krag & RĂŠder Knudsen 1999; Pentz et al. 2009).
The woman
he grave language in grave 943 demonstrates a wealthy and inluential woman
with a large network outside Birka and Björkö. She was dressed in a costume
made of various, exclusive fabrics that are likely to have been rather costly.
However, the design of the outit in which she was buried is based on a quite
old costume tradition which at this time was undergoing a process of gradual
change. Was it a deliberate choice by her or her family to be buried in this
traditional and possibly old-fashioned outit? Was this the elite costume that
stated her position in society, and was this an everyday outit?
he needle box and scissors could indicate that she produced the garment
herself but on the other hand, these items could also be seen as markers for
general female virtues and responsibilities. Collectively, the jewellery deposited
in the grave demonstrates a large network, from the Caliphate in the East to
the far West. he combination of craft and trade activities is crucial as is the
discussion of whether these activities represent the woman or her family. Was
she an amber carver who travelled around and traded her products or do the
items indicate that she was a member of a wealthy and important trading house
that was involved in both craft production and trade? hese questions will not
be answered in the present article and further studies and comparison with
other materials are necessary for future discussions. Moreover, there are no
clear attributes in the grave indicating a speciic religion or belief. According to
GrÀslund, the east-west orientation of the grave is not evidence for a Christian
burial tradition (GrÀslund 1980). One of the small amber pendants which is
shaped as a horâs hammer indicates a pagan inclination, but it is uncertain
whether this represents a personal belief or is solely connected to the amber
carving craft represented in the grave. Nor do we know if the woman buried
in Grave 943 was native to Birka or from another region, but it was certainly a
very richly equipped grave, and provides important insights into the ideology
of how the elite should be buried (Price 2012).
According to our interpretation, there is no doubt that this woman was of
signiicance in her society, and the equipment in the grave, including the
textiles, enhances our knowledge of Birkaâs society, ideology and mentality. he
grave thus reveals a woman with multiple duties and responsibilities in Viking
Age society. She must have been exceptional in her time and she continues to
be exceptional in our eyes.
21. Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
314
ARBMAN, H. 1943. Birka I. Die GrĂ€ber â Untersuchungen und Studien âText.
Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
ARWIDSSON, G. 1989.Birka II: 3. Systematische Analysen der GrÀberfunde.
Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
BAU, F. 1982. Seler og sleb i Vikingetid. Birkaâs kvindedragt i nyt lys. Kuml 1981:
13â47.
BENDER JĂRGENSEN, L. 1986. Forhistoriske Textiler i Skandinavien.
Copenhagen: Det kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftsselskab (Nordiske
Fortidsminder Ser B 9).
BENDER JĂRGENSEN, L. 1987. Metoder og kildekritik i textilforskningen. Et
svar pĂ„ et debatoplĂŠg. TOR XXI: 263â281.
ELSNER, H. 1989.Wikinger Museum Haithabu, Schaufenster einer frĂŒhen Stadt.
NeumĂŒnster: Wachholtz.
GEIJER, A. 1938. Birka: Untersuchungen und Studien. 3. Die Textilfunde aus den
GrÀbern. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
GEIJER, A. 1965. Var jĂ€rnĂ„lderns âfrisiska klĂ€deâ tillverkat i Syrien? Relektioner
i anslutning till ett arbete om tyngdvĂ€vstolen. FornvĂ€nnen 60: 112â132.
GEIJER, A. 1980. he textile inds from Birka. Acta Archaeologica 50: 209â222.
GEIJER, A. 2006. Ur textilkonstens historia. Stockholm: Tiden.
GRĂSLUND, A.-S. 1980. he Burial Customs. A Study of the Graves on Björkö.
Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets historie och antikvitets Akademien.
GRĂSLUND, A.-S. 2001. Ideologi och mentalitet: om religionsskiftet i Skandinavien
frÄn en arkeologisk horisont. Uppsala: Institutionen för Arkeologi och Antik
historia, Uppsala universitet.
HĂGG, I. 1974. KvinnodrĂ€kten i Birka: livplaggens rekonstruktion pĂ„ grundval av
det arkeologiska materialet. Uppsala: Institutionen för arkeologi Gustavianum
(AUN 2).
HĂGG, I. 1984. Birkas orientaliska praktplagg. FornvĂ€nnen 78: 204â233.
HĂGG, I. 1986. Die Tracht. In G. Arwidsson (ed.), Birka II:2: 51â72. Stockholm:
Kungl. Vitterhets historie och antikvitets Akademien.
23. Eva Andersson Strand and Ulla Mannering
316
PENTZ, P., M. PANUM BAASTRUP, S.KARG and U. MANNERING. 2009. Kong
Haralds vĂžlve. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 2009: 215â232.
PRICE,N.2012.WoodenWorlds.Individualandcollectiveinthechampergraves
of Birka. In C. Hedenstierna-Jonson (ed.), Birka nu. PÄgÄende forskning
kring vĂ€rldsarvet Birka och HovgĂ„rden: 81â94. Stockholm: Historiska museet
(Historiska Museet Studies 22).
STALSBERG, A. 1991. Women as Actors in Viking Age Trade. In R. Samson
(ed.), Social approaches to Viking Studies: 75â83. Glasgow: Cruithne press.
ZACHRISSON, T. 2011. he Archaeology of Rimbert. he Churches of Hergeirs
and Gautbert and Borg in Birka. In S. Sigmundsson (ed.), Viking Settlements
and Viking Society. Papers form the proceedings of the Sixteenth Viking Crongress,
Reykjavik and Reykholt, 16â23 August 2009: 469-493. Reykjavik: University of
Iceland Press.
ZACHRISSON, T. 2012. Birkas borg. Plats för kyrka och biskopsborg? In C.
Hedenstierna-Jonson (ed.), Birka nu. PÄgÄende forskning kring vÀrldsarvet Birka
och HovgĂ„rden: 199â212. Stockholm: Historiska museet (Historiska Museet
Studies 22).