The document discusses a luncheon seminar on personalisation in education, led by James Ballard and Philip Butler, focusing on harnessing technology to transform learning. It highlights the need for education systems to conform to individual learners and the challenges of defining personalisation. Additionally, it addresses tools like e-portfolios and learning management systems that support this personalised approach.

1. CDE Lunchtime Seminar 11 th March 2009 James Ballard ( [email_address] ) & Philip Butler ( [email_address] )

2. Drivers Harnessing Technology: Transforming Learning Regional JISC Advisory work: Croydon Adult Learner’s Project (2005) London Regional VLE User’s Group (2006) Personalisation - Background

3. Changing Culture individual social Information communication Passive interactive institutional tools personalised tools

4. Personalisation - Background

5. Highlights Lack of understanding / clarity on personalisation Rubbish talked about it SMT strategic leverage is crucial Web 2.0 synthesis: need to keep pace of student owned technology LEON 08 – ‘Let’s Get Personal’

6. Let's not get personal ! BBC Education Friday, 21 November 2008 Professor David Hargreaves… struggled for the past four years to define it but had now concluded that it was "a total waste of time trying to find a definition". Gilbert Review - "well-intentioned waffle". Should be seen as a constant challenge rather than a particular state to be reached.

7. Personalisation ‘ The logic of education systems should be reversed so that it is the system that conforms to the learner, rather than the learner to the system. This is the essence of personalisation’. Personalisation and Digital Technologies http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/opening_education/Personalisation_report.pdf

8. Personalisation ‘ The logic of education systems should be reversed so that it is the system that conforms to the learner, rather than the learner to the system. This is the essence of personalisation’. Personalisation and Digital Technologies http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/opening_education/Personalisation_report.pdf

9. Personalisation

10. Improving Quality: Inspection Ensure each learner has: Initial assessments An individual learning plan Mapped route for achievement of goals QIA – Excellence Gateway ‘ Encourage all organisations to support a personal online learning space for learners. ’ DFES – Harnessing Technology, e-Strategy

11. Personalisation Model Element Ownership Focus Key attributes VLE Institution Course delivery MIS Integrated Differentiated Learning PLP Institution Tutorial Support Target Setting Reviews Status e-Portfolio: Assessment Institution Awarding Body Criteria Tracking Verification e-Portfolio: Learning Space Learner Personal Showcase User defined Transportable

12. ULCC VLE Moodle Resources Communication Collaboration Assessment System Integration Tracking

13. ULCC ILP Moodle Module Package Target setting Progress Reviews User Centric Report Pastoral Roles

14. Target Setting

15. Redbridge College

16. Greenwich College

17. City of Westminster College

18. Barnsley College

19. ULCC Evidence Manager e-Portfolio module ‏ Map user evidence to course outcomes Track progress for award Assessor review Sampling overview

20. ULCC Evidence Manager

21. ULCC e-Portfolio Development Mahara Multiple Views Transportable Reflective Journals C.V. Builder Social Networking

22. Mahara Learning Space

23. Presenting Work

24. Presenting Courses

25. Student Portal

26. CDE Lunchtime Seminar 11 th March 2009 James Ballard & Philip Butler