Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

WAAPP-Nigeria Environmental and Social Screening presentation


Published on

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

WAAPP-Nigeria Environmental and Social Screening presentation

  1. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIALENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL SCREENING UNDER WAAPP – ANSCREENING UNDER WAAPP – AN INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION A presentation at a Meeting between WAAPP-PCOA presentation at a Meeting between WAAPP-PCO and Coordinators of Adopted Villages of NARIs &and Coordinators of Adopted Villages of NARIs & FCAs, Nugget Hotel, Abuja 14FCAs, Nugget Hotel, Abuja 14thth August 2013August 2013 By Hussain Shittu WAAPP – Environment Focal Point
  2. 2. OUTLINE Screening & categorisation  Project proposal screening form
  3. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL SCREENING WHAT IS SCREENING? It is a process of evaluating various project components/ activities against environmental variables to:  Help determine the need or otherwise for an EA for a project proposal and; establish the level of review applicable to a given project
  4. 4. PURPOSE OF SCREENING Screening is to achieve the following purposes: Determine whether or not a proposal requires an EA Determine what level of EA is required. It is intended to ensure that the form or level of any EIA review is commensurate with the importance of the issues raised by a proposal. Screening establishes the basis for scoping.
  5. 5. SCREENING PROCEDURE Screening Activity Involves The Following: Initial Environmental Examination “ carried out in cases where the environmental impacts of a proposal are uncertain or unknown (e.g. new technologies or undeveloped areas); Environmental overview “ carried out as a rapid assessment of the environmental issues and impacts of a proposal; and Class screening “carried out for a fam ily o f sm all pro je cts o r re pe titive activitie s , where the environmental effects and means of mitigation are known but there is potential for cumulative impacts (e.g. dredging, road realignment, bank stabilization e.t.c).
  6. 6. SCREENING PROCEDURE CONT’D Screening: CategoryA Cate g o ry A: “sig nificant, adve rse e nviro nm e ntal im pacts that are se nsitive , dive rse o r unpre ce de nte d”. “Se nsitive ” im pact: m ay be irre ve rsible o r raise sig nificant issue s re fle cte d in vario us safe g uard po licie s re lating to natural habitats (e . g . , le ad to lo ss o f m ajo r natural habitat), invo luntary re se ttle m e nt, im pacts o n Indig e no us Pe o ple s o r PhysicalCulturalRe so urce s. May affe ct an are a bro ade r than site s o r facilitie s subje ct to physicalwo rks.
  7. 7. SCREENING PROCEDURE CONT’D Screening: CategoryB Category B: “potential adverse environmental impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas--including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other natural habitats-- are less adverse than Category A; Impacts are site-specific, few if any irreversible, mitigation measures designed more easily than for Category A” Sco pe o f EAnarro we r and m o re fo cuse d than fo r Cate g o ry A– m ay o nly be an Enviro nm e ntalManag e m e nt Plan. Do e s no t include an analysis o f bro ade r alte rnative s. O fte n use s we llte ste d m itig atio n and m o nito ring m e asure s. Mo re fo cuse d co nsultatio n pro ce ss.
  10. 10. Screening Procedure Cont’d A sample of Screening Form
  11. 11. Environmental and social selection form 1 Project implementation location 2 Name, function and information on the person filling this form. Date: Signatures: PART A: Brief description of the proposed agricultural project (i) the proposed project (surface area, land needed, approximate size of total surface to be occupied (ii) necessary actions during the implementation of activities and the exploitation of the project. Part B: Brief description of the environmental situation and identification of environmental and social impacts 1 Natural environment (a) Describing soil formation, topography, the vegetation of the location/adjacent to the agricultural project implementation area (b) Making an assessment and specifying the vegetation thereof (c) Are there sensitive areas on the environmental plan or threatened species? 2 Ecology of rivers and lakes: Could the ecology of rivers or lakes, due to the delivery and exploitation of the agricultural activity, be negatively affected? Yes No 3 Protected areas Is the area around project site inside or adjacent to any government protected area (national park, national reserve world heritage site, etc)? Yes No If the delivery/operating of the school happens outside a protected area (or near it), is this likely to have negative impact on the ecology of the protected area (example: interference with mammals or birds migration routes) Yes No
  12. 12. Environmental and social selection form, Cont’d 4 Geology and soils: Are there areas with geological or soil instability e.g, landslides, subsidence)? Yes No 5 Landscape/aesthetics: Could the project affect the beauty of the local landscape? Yes No 6 Historical, archeological or cultural heritage sites. Could the project, negatively affect historical, archeological or cultural heritage sites or will this require archeological dig in a very close area? Yes No 7 Compensation and/or land acquisition Will the acquisition or loss of lands, denial or restriction of access to land or to other economic resources be imputable to the project concerned? Yes No 8 Crop loss, fruit tree, domestic infrastructures: Will the project lead to the permanent or temporary loss of crops, fruit trees, or domestic infrastructures Yes No 9 Noise pollution during project delivery and implementation Will the noise level during the implementation of the project concerned go beyond the acceptable noise limit? Yes No 10 Solid or liquid waste: Will the activity concerned generate solid or liquid wastes? Yes No If“Yes”, did the project provide for a waste collection or disposal plan? Yes No 11 11. Public consultation Was the public consultation and participation factored in during the development and implementation of the project? If “Yes”, give brief description of measures taken in this regard. Yes No Part C: Alleviation measures For all answers with « Yes », PFEs, in consultation with local technical institutions, in particular those in charge of environment, should provide brief description of related measures.
  13. 13. Environmental and social selection form, Cont’d Part D: Project classification and environmental work:  Projet Type(A): No environmental work required  Projet Type(B): Simple mitigation measures needed  Projet Type(C): Environmental Impact Study needed
  14. 14. THANKYOU!!!