Essay On Bill Of Rights

Essay on Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights as it stands for the United States entered as a stems from a vow as promises so to speak was made by the Fathers of Confederation
to the states during the effort for ratification of the Constitution in 1787–1788. Numerous states had created some conditions for their ratification; the
appendage of amendments, which would assure citizen's a safeguard like a safety net for their human rights in contrast to the central government and
therefore the people had a rather remarkable circumstances in which the entrenchment of a bill of rights in the American Constitution was prepared by
means of the fundamental command of the states, they themselves being alarmed about the central government which was not officially enforced...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They were put into operation by the House of Representatives on August 21, 1789, officially endorsed by a joint resolution pledge of Congress on
September 25, 1789, and fell and with that created the Constitutional Amendments on December 15, 1791, throughout the course of endorsement by
three–fourths of the states. However twelve amendments were proposed by Congress, only ten were formally ratified by the states. From the remaining
two, one was accepted two hundred and three years later and with that extended into the Twenty–seventh Amendment, and the other technically lingers
in the path of head of the states. A very significant part of the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights without a doubt states the numerous rights of the
citizens of the United States. These rights were acknowledged within the first Ten Amendments of the Constitution. Put into action on December 15,
1791, with allocates was simple, for example the right for a speedy public trial, freedom of religion. If one takes a closer look from a different angles
one may see real meaning as well as the reason why the Bill of Rights was written. Why was the Bill of Rights written? The United States Bill of Rights
came into being as a result of a promise made by the Fathers of Confederation to the states during the struggle for ratification of the Constitution in
1787–88. A great number of the states made as a condition for their
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common
defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the
United States of America."
The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the United States. It provides important limitations on the government that
protect the fundamental rights of United States citizens and it's the source of all government powers.
The American Constitution established the foundation of democratic government for over 2 centuries. It can be considered as the longest lasting and
also strongest document in the history of government and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The government may not conduct any searches without a warrant (such warrants must be issued by a judge and based on probable cause)
The Fifth Amendment – provides that citizens not be subject to criminal prosecution and punishment without due process
– Citizens may not be tried on the same set of facts twice and are protected from self–incrimination (the right to remain silent)
This amendment is also ensuring that private property is not seized for public use without just compensation
The Sixth Amendment – assures the right to a speedy trial, to be informed of the crimes with which they are charged and to confront the witnesses
brought by the government
Also provides the accused the right to compel testimony from witnesses and to legal representation
The Seventh Amendment – civil cases are also tried by

The Importance Of Gun Control Laws In The United States
The Constitution was written from May 25th through September 17th, 1787, the day it was signed. Originally the Constitution was made up of ten
amendments, but as of 2011 there are now twenty–seven, all of which have been ratified and added into the Bill of Rights. Each amendment has had its
fair share of interrogation, and currently the Constitution's validity is being questioned due to the fact that the writers of the Constitution were all men
and slave owners at that. Though today, with the rising amount of shootings, the Second Amendment has been front and center in the media. The
Second Amendment directly states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear
Arms, shall not be infringed." But the Second Amendment is up for different interpretations to everybody, regardless of the last four words of the
amendment, "shall not be infringed."... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Constitution of the United States of America is a building block of how our country came to be. If a single amendment is questioned, the entire
validity of the Constitution is questioned. The mains topics I will be discussing in this paper are: how gun control laws are put into place, common
sense as a driving force behind the Second Amendment and how guns are obtained. I will summarize all of these topics under women being able more
efficiently protect themselves by being able to carry a

The Constitution Of The United States
The Constitution of the United States holds the upmost law for our country. It is a very important document that keeps our government in control and
regulates the rights of people. The first part of the Constitution breaks down the government into three branches. The Legislative branch, which is the
branch that creates laws and ratifies them. Congress is also a part of the Legislative branch. There is also the Executive branch, which consists of the
President and Vice President. The last branch of the government is the Judicial branch, which is where the state courts and Supreme Court comes into
play. The rest of the Constitution deals with federalism, differentiating state governments and the federal government, and the procedures for how to
ratify a state. The Constitution was amended twenty–seven times since it was first written, which means there are twenty–seven amendments located
within the Constitution. The first ten amendments are known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights highlights citizens' rights and protects their
freedom, while also placing regulations on what the Government can intercede on. The rest of the amendments also apply to protecting the rights of the
people, but they are more specific to causes.
The Constitution is accepted by all who live within the United States. It is followed every day and it is the people's job as citizens of this country to
uphold the Constitution to the highest degree and follow the law.
The Second Amendment of

Amendments Essay 8
Amendments
Main article: List of amendments to the United States Constitution
The Constitution has a total of 27 amendments. The first ten, collectively known as the Bill of Rights, were ratified simultaneously. The following
seventeen were ratified separately.
[edit]
The Bill of Rights (1В–10) United States Bill of Rights currently housed in the National Archives
Main article: United States Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the Constitution. Those amendments were adopted between 1789 and 1791, and all relate to
limiting the power of the federal government. They were added in response to criticisms of the Constitution by the state ratification conventions and by
prominent individuals such as Thomas ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The only existing case law regarding this amendment is a lower court decision in the case of Engblom v. Carey. [4]
"No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by
law."
[edit]
Fourth Amendment
Main article: Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Fourth Amendment guards against searches, arrests, and seizures of property without a specific warrant or a "probable cause" to believe a crime
has been committed. A general right to privacy has been inferred from this amendment and others by the Supreme Court (See Griswold v. Connecticut),
including a right to abortion (Roe v. Wade).
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and
no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized."
[edit]
Fifth Amendment

Main article: Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The fifth forbids trial for a major crime except after indictment by a grand jury; prohibits repeated trials for the same offense after an acquittal (except
in certain very limited circumstances); forbids punishment without due process of law; and provides that an accused person may not be compelled to

Us Constitution Essay
Is the constitution still appropriate for America in the 21st Century? Written in seventeen– eighty–nine, being two hundred and twenty–five years old,
Today, many of us question whether or not the United States Constitution is still relevant. When our founding fathers wrote the Constitution, it was
written according to their needs in the eighteenth century. According to the Bill of Rights, everyone has the right to bear arms, but in the twenty–first
century what exactly does it mean to have the right to bear arms? Our meaning of the Constitution today, is different than the meaning of the
Constitution two hundred and twenty–five years ago. After breaking free and declaring their independence from Great Britain, the founding fathers...
During the second constitutional convention, there were areas of agreements and disagreements between the representatives. They agreed upon human
nature, political conflicts, objections of the government, and nature of the government, but when it came to equality, many disagreed. How can the
constitution be relevant today when even in the eighteenth century, there were issues on what it meant to be equal or not? With arguments made
between both the followers of the Virginia and New Jersey plan, came the Great Compromise. The Great compromise stated that in states with slavery,
one slave would be counted as three–fifths of a person. This is written in Article one section eight, clause one of the constitution. How can the
constitution still be relevant today when the topics of Slavery are still found in the constitution. Therefore, a new constitution shall be written to
officially end the talk of slavery. Why is the topic of slavery found in our constitution when slavery ended one hundred and fifty–two years ago? In an
article written by Paul Finkelman, a writer from The New York Times, "The convention prohibited the end of the African slave trade until 1808
(allowing for the importation of more than 60,000 more Africans), but did not require it ever be ended. It adopted two clauses that guaranteed the
federal government would suppress slave insurrections and one that required the return of fugitive slaves." How can the country go on with such a

Similarities Between China And Us Constitution
There are various differences and similarities between the United State and the People's Republic of China, while comparing their constitution. The first
and obvious difference in those two constitutions is the number of amendments or articles in each constitution. The United States has twenty–seven
amendments on total, while China's constitution is very specific and has one hundred thirty–eight articles on total. The United States is an individualism
country, on the other hand China is a socialist country. Thus, another difference between the constitution between China and the United States is the
structure of each government. In China, the power is held in the hands of people, as the first article of China's constitution mentions that "All power in
the People's Republic of China belongs to the people.", and in those of elected people in National People's Congress and the local ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The Constitution of the United States wrote the right on the First Amendment that the "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise...". The Constitution of People's Republic of China also mentions the freedom express right in the article 35.
At the same time, the article 36 points that the citizens of People's Republic of China can enjoy freedom of religious belief. However, there are some
differences about the approaches to the freedom between those two countries. The First Amendment is not specific about what is and is not allowed
when citizens express their freedom. Those were decided during the cases related the First Amendment. On the other hand, the constitution of China
states some restriction about religion activities in article 36, "No one may make use of religion to engage in activities that disrupt public order, impair
the health of citizens or interfere with the educational system of the

Pros And Cons Of Amending The United States Constitution
Amending the United States Constitution is not an easy feat, since the ratification of the bill of rights, thousands of amendments have been proposed to
congress but only seventeen have actually made it in our constitution. (Sidlow, 43) This may have something to do with the long extensive process that
goes along with getting an amendment passed. There are two ways to propose an amendment, the first way is to get two–thirds vote in the Senate and
in the House of Representatives. Even though this is the way all of the twenty seven existing amendments have been proposed, this can be extremely
difficult as there 535 members of congress. The next process is, if two–thirds of state legislators request that congress call a national amendment
convention, then congress must call one. Many national politicians are wary of this process in fear of doing what the Constitutional Convention did–
create a new... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In June 2006 the amendment that would ban burning the United States flag failed in senate by one vote. (NY Times) This case at the time was highly
controversial and debated since Texas vs Johnson. (1989) Many felt like that burning the flag was constitutional under the first amendment, others felt
as if the American flag was a direct source of American freedom and liberty and should be protected. It's quite hard to pass a controversial amendment
as this one, wide spread support is a must have. The amendment failed for a main reason, it didn't have enough support. It passed through the House of
Representatives but when it got to the senate, it failed to get the two thirds votes necessary. The process of amending the constitution is difficult for this
reason, it prevents adding laws that can infringe the right of others or isn't

The United States Constitution
The Constitution The Constitution is the foundation of the United States Government. Each branch of the government relies upon this document to
dictate how power is distributed in this democracy and the people rely on the Constitution to protect them from the Federal government's power. Before
the Constitution the colonies were divided under the governance of the Articles of Confederation. This first government was adequate through the
Revolutionary War but afterwards the people needed union and a strong central government. The need for a government spurred men into action and
the Constitutional Convention was called to develop this much needed strong central government. These men were known as the Framers of the
constitution. Unfortunately not all was good at the convention. There was much debate about the way the legislative branch between the Virginia plan
and the New jersey Plan and the debate was resolved with the Connecticut compromise. There were many more debates over things great and small but
one of the most important was the debate between the Federalists and anti–Federalists about the ratification of the constitution and including a Bill of
Rights which guarantees the people's rights and protections therein. The combination of these many factors created the Constitution as it is known
today, a strong central "trunk to the United State's "tree" that will grow new branches over time and let others fall to fit the needs of the people resting
under its protective

Missouri Constitution History
Missouri Constitution History
Missouri's statehood was declared official on August 10, 1821 it was formed out of what was first the vast Louisiana territory. Missouri has had four
constitutions:
The first was adopted in 1820 and was written in a very short amount of time. It was a basic and relatively short document that could only be amended
by the legislature. It only guaranteed that all free white male citizens of the United States, that were twenty–one years of age, and who had lived in the
territory for a minimum of three months before the election day could vote.
The second constitution was adopted near the end of the civil war in 1865. This document placed some restrictions on the legislature and provided for
popular ratification of

How To Repeal The 22nd Amendment Essay
Should we repeal the 22nd amendment? The 22nd amendment sets a limit on the number of times a person is eligible for election to the office of
President of the United States, and also sets additional eligibility conditions for presidents who succeed to the unexpired terms of their predecessors.
The purpose of the 22nd amendment was to prevent the ability of a president to become corrupt and a tyrant. Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first
president to serve more than the traditional two terms by serving four (March 4, 1933 – April 12, 1945). And was only able to do so because there
wasn't a law against it at the time. He didn't finish his fourth elected term because death caught up to him. "I don't like arbitrary term limits," he said.
"I think our country was better off because Franklin Delano Roosevelt was able to run for a fourth term.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Clinton noted that his version of his rule would need to be at least a four–year break between the presidents first terms and any attempt to serve a third.
The 22nd amendment shafts a president's ability to have a successful second term. "It has made a virtue of inexperience among American
presidents. The practice of having a new president every four or eight years has shown to lead to a failing and mistakes during a president's first or
second year in office. That has been particularly true in foreign policy. Over the last fifty years, John Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill
Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama have had rocky first years in foreign policy. Kennedy– Bay of Pigs. Reagan – Lebanon. Clinton – flailing in the
former Yugoslavia and with Japan. And Obama's initial Afghanistan policy was flawed." (The New

The Constitution: The Seven Amendments In The United States
The United States Constitution was signed on the seventeenth of September in the year 1787. It is composed of the body and the Bill of Rights.
Before it was ratified in the year 1787 the U.S. Government only worked off the seven Articles of Confederation. To strengthen the Government
without taking away the rights and freedoms of the people the Bill of Rights was added in what is now called the Great Compromise. The Bill of
Rights consists of the first ten Amendments to the Constitution. However, nowadays these Amendments are in some ways out of date. This is why the
Founding Fathers wrote it in the Constitution that new Amendments could be made or old ones could be changed, to fit the times. As of today there
are twenty–seven Amendments to

George Washington Two Term Limit
Term Limits America's founding father, George Washington, set the pattern for presidential term limits to two four year terms; but not through any
legislative means. Before 1947, there were no term limit rules. George Washington's footsteps as the first President set an unbroken precedent for term
limits, but it wasn't until much later that the 22nd Amendment was passed. In more recent years, politicians and citizens alike have begun to point out
more of the flaws in the two–term limit than ever before; and they are on the right track. Restricting the president to a two–term limits the president's
effectiveness in office, provides the opportunity for an elected president to abuse power, and restricts a current president from continuing a successful
policy even when majority wishes for the opposite George Washington, while considered to be the founder of term–limits, actually opposed them
entirely. In a letter to the Marquis de Lafayette, Washington said, "I can see no propriety in precluding ourselves from the service of any man
who...shall be deemed capable of serving the public," (Washington Post 2013). Washington didn't step down from the presidency to encourage... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1947, Senator Harley Kilgore of West Virginia wrote, "The executives' effectiveness will be seriously impaired...no one will obey and respect him
if he knows that the executive cannot run again," (Washington Post 2013). Barack Obama has received an excess amount of backlash from
congressional members of congress since the start of his second term; mostly, in part, that the congress is no longer intimidated due to the fact that
Obama is nearly done (Washington Post 2013). This opens the doors for many outbursts from lesser politicians who no longer feel that respect is
necessary. This, by itself, creates huge issues in an effective executive office. Lack of respect for the leader of the free–world leads to failure for

Importance Of Extended Suffrage To Disenfranchised People
Alexis Bostick Mr. McKown Government 7 5 December 2017 Extended Suffrage To Disenfranchised People "We hold these truths to be self
–evident,
that all men are created equal..." are famous words straight from The Declaration of Independence. Yet in the time period it was written, the 1700's,
slavery still existed, women were not seen equal in society to men, and minorities were not as respected as white people. Although in today's society
this would be viewed as unconstitutional, it was all too normal in the early history of our country. Voting is an important right to have as a citizen. By
voting you are voicing your opinion on subjects that will affect every aspect of your daily life. For people to not have the right to vote and help make
the life they want for themselves is not fair. The following fifteenth, nineteenth, twenty–fourth, and twenty–sixth amendments gave people the suffrage
rights they deserved. African Americans had been made citizens after the Civil War in 1865 and also freed from slavery. But still white people,
primarily in southern states, continued to use a variety of methods to prevent any African Americans from using their right to vote. Houses were
burned down of those who had voted and threats and beatings were instilled. Literacy tests were also used, ironically in a time period when most people

Should the 22nd Amendment Be Repealed
In the political world today there are so many different opinions about several different topics. The topics that I will address to you will be, should the
22nd Amendment be repealed and also should the foreign born be allowed to run for president. In both topics you may have your pros and cons, but I
am strongly against the both of them because I feel that the Constitution should not be taken advantage of. Government should not be allowed to
manipulate the Constitution to suit his or her needs. While making adjustments to the Constitution to allow different things to take place for
convenience doesn 't leave any form respect of the Constitution. There should be a line drawn to keep this from happening for years to come on these
issues... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Republicans are pushing for Schwarzenegger to be the one who put this statement to an end reach reads: Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the
Constitution. It reads, "No person except a natural born citizen ... shall be eligible to the office of president (CNN News, 2004). Schwarzenegger 's
supporters are pushing for a constitutional amendment that would allow the Austrian–born governor to run for president while others are against this
change, (USA Today, 2005). These issues and other issues are just a test to see if the American people will allow such changes to take place without
having input on it. In addition, it could become a test of American attitudes toward immigrants in the post–9/11 era, and also put some more thought
into the topic of interest. I am totally against it because I am employed by the Immigration service and changes to the Constitution would allow room
for disasters to our country. Although, there are some immigrants that are here to make a difference, there are still others who will not remain loyal to
our country and follow our guidelines of making our country a safe and better place to live. http://www.termlimits.org/Current_Info
/22nd–Amendment–text.html

The United States President Should Not Be Limited
Thesis: Should the United States President be Limited to the Terms of Service in Office? In this paper, I will argue that the United States president
should not be limited to two terms in office. The rational for two terms has been to prevent abuse of power. My argument is based on the benefits of
unlimited presidential terms and the hindrance of limited terms on the United States' economy. An important element to consider is the role democracy
plays on presidential terms and elections. The respect of human rights is a significant attribute in a democratic environment and economy. Democracy
allows the rights of citizens to be respected, such as an individual's speech, religion or ethnicity. In a democratic economy every citizen has the... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1947 Senator Claude argued "I think our people are to be safely trusted with their own destiny." This is exactly what democracy gives the people
of United States, a sense of security that the power to select their leader is in their hands. If the people are limited in how many terms the can elect a
president, does that not defeat the purpose of democracy? Or if anything conflicts with the sole aim of democracy giving power to the people. Senator
Claude also said "We do not need to protect the American people with a prohibition against a president whom they do not wish to elect; and if they
wanted to elect him, have we the right to deny them the power?" The answer to that statement should be no, because a democratic government should
not reflect any characteristics of a totalitarian government whatsoever. And denying the people their wish who they wish to elect only reflects that.
Why prevent a presidential administration from reelection if the rate of effectiveness is high and beneficial to the economy? When elected in to office
each president brings for an agenda, which is a list of adequacies to improve the country. Some Presidents successfully accomplished their intended
goal at the end of their presidential term, some appear to be completely unsuccessful. And others leave the presidential office with a completely
effective plan that appears to die because they cannot recomplete for the presidential sit and the newly

The Resolved Issue Of The Constitution Essay
Elias Ramirez Dr. Shazia Ali, Dr. Mike Walker ENGL
–1301 Composition I October 18, 2016 The resolved issue of the Constitution. Over the duration
of conducting research the overlay of the essay will be describing the major benefit of the U.S Constitution. While several issues have been unresolved
by the U.S Constitution such as the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The entire focus of the essay will describe the resolved issue that have been
corrected in the constitution, while also describing some of the historical events that were caused the U.S constitution to change. The U.S constitution
helped resolve issue and was a document that represent our nation as an independent nation after the revolutionary war. The U.S constitution was
drafted in 1787. Which is still used by the U.S government that can be modified under a specific process. The U. S Constitution is a "fundamental
system of, written and unwritten laws for the recently" (Constitution 2016, Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia) independent United States at
the time. However, the constitution was ratified with the acceptation of ten laws in which the government could "no law may conflict with the federal
constitution." (U.S. Constitution, Encyclopedia of American Law and Criminal Justice, Revised Edition) The process that takes place to change or add
an amendment requires, the amendment to start with in the house of representative such as the senate or the congress. However only a total of
twenty–seven

The Constitution Of The United States
The Constitution is a document that was created by the American people as a basic guide line for the country to follow. The Constitution is made up of
twenty–seven amendments. These amendments are laws that everyone in the United States of America must follow. The Constitution is often viewed
as a "living document". The Constitution is thought of it in such a way because of its ability to be amended whenever it is needed to be amended.
When the Constitution is amended, it will sometimes have documents that repeal each other. When an amendment is repealed, it basically means that
if any previous amendment that was created contradicts the new amendment, the old amendment is not followed anymore. The amendment that this
paper will cover is the twenty–sixth amendment. The twenty–sixth amendment gives any United States citizen that is eighteen years or older the right
to vote, and shall not be denied the right to vote on federal, state, or local level ("Harrison" et al.). This paper will cover various information on the
twenty–sixth amendment such as its background, reasons for it being added to the Constitution, and how it was controversial. The twenty–sixth
amendment was first introduced during the World War II. The amendment started coming up around this time because people were complaining that if
they were going to fight for their country, they should have a say in who they can vote for. A slogan that was going around at this time was, "Old
enough to fight, old enough to

The Second Amendment And The Amendment
The Second Amendment "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
not be infringed." A paltry twenty–seven words, present in the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution, have been a major focal point of the
seemingly endless debate over whether, and for what purposes, US citizens have a right to own firearms. Positions vary wildly from those that hold
these words to mean citizens have the right to violent revolt to those that believe they only allow the United States Armed Forces to exist, as well as a
multitude of positions in between. The two primary positions presented on this issue are generally referred to as the "individual rights" and "states'
rights" positions ("Second"). The "individual rights" position posits that the amendment was written to secure private citizens' personal right to own
firearms as they see fit. This conclusion is generally concluded by looking at the rest of the Bill of Rights as well as many personal writings of the
framers of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was originally written due to issues many states brought forth concerning the power of the federal
government to restrict personal liberties. These ten amendments were meant to enshrine certain liberties into the constitution ("Bill"). Each amendment
in the Bill of Rights exists to ensure individuals maintain freedoms deemed important enough to directly block the government from taking. The

The United States Constitution: The First Ten Amendments
The United States Constitution is made up of the twenty seven amendments, the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution is known as the
Bill of Rights. The first ten amendments describe the privileges and rights that each person in the United States is entitled to and it also set limits on
the governments powers. The other amendments are changes or additions made to the constitution. When the thoughts were still present of the British
violation of civil rights during the Revolution; the beliefs were that the way the Constitution was written left a chance of unreasonable and unjust
powers of the government. Several states demanded that the Constitution be amended so James Madison drafted twelve amendments that Congress
sent to the states, of these twelve, ten were... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It also granted individuals with the privilege to have organizations and the right to freedom of speech. The 2nd Amendment protects citizens of the right
to bear firearms meaning individuals can own and use weapons for safety and security purposes. The 3rd Amendment prohibits the government from
demanding that home owners provide living quarter for soldiers during their peacetime. The 4th Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search
and seizure, meaning search warrants have to be granted by the counts to allow authorities to search an individual's property or there must be probable
cause. The 5th Amendment protects the people against being tried twice for the same crime, prevents an individual from being hold to answer for a
crime without appropriate evidence. The 6th Amendment grants individual the right to have lawyers to help them, right to have witnesses during a
trail, the right to know what a person is being charged with, and the right a speedy trail where the jury is choose from the community where the crime
was committed. The 7th Amendment grants the people the right to a trial by jury and the 8th Amendment does not allow excessive

Examples Of The First Ten Amendments
The first ten amendments are known as the Bill of Rights.
First Amendment: protects the rights of Americans to worship as they please, or to have no religion if they prefer; freedom of speech, freedom of the
press.
Second Amendment: ensures citizens and the nation the right to security.
Third Amendment: prohibits the government from forcing people to quarter – to provide shelter for – soldiers in their homes.
Fourth Amendment: reflects the early Americans' desire to protect their privacy.
Fifth Amendment: contains four major protections for people accused of crimes.
Sixth Amendment: protects the rights of individuals charged with federal crimes to defend themselves in a court trial.
Seventh Amendment: provides for the right to a jury trial in federal courts to settle all disputes about property worth more than $20. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Twelfth Amendment (1804): corrects a problem that had arisen in the method of electing the president and vice president.
Thirteenth Amendment (1865): outlaws slavery.
Fourteenth Amendment (1868): protects the legal rights of the freed slaves and their descendants.
Fifteenth Amendment (1870): prohibits the government from denying a person's' right to vote on the basis of race.
Sixteenth Amendment (1913): gives Congress the power to levy individual income taxes
Seventeenth Amendment (1913): states that the people, instead of state legislatures, elect United States senators.
Eighteenth Amendment (1919): prohibits the manufacture, sale, or transportation of alcoholic beverages, concluding a crusade to abolish the use of
liquor that began in the 1830s.
Nineteenth Amendment (1920): guaranteed women the right to vote.
Twentieth Amendment (1933): sets new dates for Congress to begin its term and for the inauguration of the president and vice president.
Twenty First Amendment (1933): repealed the unsuccessful Eighteenth

The United States Of America Fought For Independence
The United States of America fought for independence in 1775 until 1783. After the war, the newly independent Americans needed a new
government. The Continental Congress, after years of debate and drafting, decided to adopt the Articles of Confederation in 1781. The first draft
was proposed in 1775, but never acted upon. Many drafts were proposed, six, to be exact, and in 1777 it was given to the states for approval.
Maryland was the last to ratify it, given to concerns of lands to the west. After this was settled, they approved and the Articles of Confederation went
into effect on March 1, 1781 ("Articles of Confederation."). However, none of these six drafts compared to the document of the U.S. Constitution in
1787. This document changes the union from a loose group of friendly states allowed to attend to almost all affairs, to states united under a federal
government. Not all of the founding fathers thought that this document was good, though. The debates were between two parties, the federalists and
the anti–federalists. The anti federalists thought that the constitution gave the federal government too much power. Despite these fears, the constitution
was ratified. To this day government officials argue about legitimacy of laws and whether the federal government or the states have the right to pass the
laws in question. All throughout the time that the United States has operated under the constitution, it has been a fight between views of centralism and

Pros And Cons Of The 22nd Amendment
Until 1951, there was no law restricting the number of times the president of the United States could run for office. After the presidency of Franklin D.
Roosevelt, Congress proposed the 22nd Amendment. Since its ratification, the highly controversial amendment has survived every attempted repeal.
Contemporary presidents of both parties, President Regan and President Clinton, supported repealing or modifying the amendment whereas other
presidents believed a repeal would result in political stagnation. While there are certain benefits of restricted term limits, the otherwise undemocratic
22nd Amendment should be repealed. David Karol, a proponent of repeal, argues first and foremost the amendment is undemocratic and considers it to
be the "most offensive" aspect of the law. Presidential term limits reduce the public's influence over the electoral process. Furthermore, the amendment
is based solely on distrust and fear which historically does not make for good policy. In his argument, Karol cited historian Henry Steele Commager
who suggested that the amendment was simply "posthumous vengeance" on President Roosevelt and the shortsighted partisan act resulted in bad
policy. Simultaneously, the amendment does nothing to stop the expanding power of the executive. For example, in his first term, President Lyndon B.
Johnson exaggerated the Gulf of Tonkin incident to work around the limitations of the office. Since the second half of the 20th century, the power of
the president has

Essay On The 22nd Amendment
The Constitution is a living, breathing document. It was recognized that each future generation would be facing new challenges that would have never
occurred to the older ones, so it had the flexibility available by both interpretation and revisement to allow the newer generation to use the document as
it was intended. As society and government grows, additions must be made to the Constitution to keep with the times. The Constitution is also
governed by the thoughts of society at that time, seen in the implementation of the 18th amendment because of the urgings of religious and Women's
Suffrage movements. As it is also seen when the government grows weary of one president in office too long, seen in the creation of the 22nd
amendment. In the early 1800s the Second Great Awakening was gaining momentum, birthing several movements such as the Temperance Movement,
Women's Suffrage, and the Anti–Slavery Abolitionist Movement. These movements also sparked the idea of alcohol being a threat to society as a
whole, stating that it was a 'National Curse'. Under this guise that by ridding the country as a whole of alcohol, it would decrease crime and cause an
increase in other industries. The idea was... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Making it so that no president could serve more than two terms, four years each. This did not leave much of an impact on the government or society,
as, aside from FDR, no other president had gone beyond eight years. But, this unspoken term needed to be addressed as neither political party was
keen about the other having the presidential party in said position for an undetermined amount of time. It is theorized that if certain presidents had kept
going on for a third or fourth term, they could have seen out the full implementation of their policies instead of leaving it to their predecessors, but it is
only a theory with no evidence is supporting the

Should The Constitution Be Ratified For The Future?
Throughout American history the constitution has been the framework for democracy. Written in 1787, the constitution was a great conception for the
thirteen colonies. Now two–hundred and twenty–eight years later the United States is not a county of freedom fighting European–Americans. In this
diverse and modern society concerns have come to surface as to whether the constitution should be ratified for the future to come. Ratifying the
constitution sounds like a good notion, but is nearly impossible to do. I believe the constitution should stand as is but allow another document arise
that corrects the loop holes of the constitution. When the colonist were drafting the constitution they couldn't have imagined the tremendous growth we
have achieved today. With innovation comes conflict. Many citizens feel the United States gives an illusion of freedom. Today the biggest conflicts
are centered on basic rights spelled out in the constitution. It's no secret the National Association of Surveillance illegally obtains information from
the electronic devices of United States citizens. The actions of the NSA violate the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 9th amendment rights. The NSA's use of
information impedes on the first amendment in terms of freedom of press. For a journalist the source is the key, and the key stays confidential. With
the NSA collecting digital trails there is a higher risk for whistle blowers to be charged with criminal act or even assassinated. The courts stand by the
NSA, for

What Was The Importance Of The 13th Amendment
The constitution of the United States is composed of 7 articles and 27 amendments. These articles and amendments each have an important role in
maintaining the government's power balanced and limited.
Article one, section one, clause one , explains how congress is given the power to make laws. This section is also known as the "vesting clause" no
other branch is allowed to have this same power. Section two clause one, explains the ways of the house of representatives. The citizens of each state
get to vote or choose the members of the house of Representatives.Section four clause two, explains that where, when and how elections are to be held,
is specifically determined by each state. Section 7 clause one, explicates the way congress makes acts through bills, which are brought up either in the
senate or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In other words, you cannot sue a state without that state knowing that your taking actions against them. A citizen cannot sue its own state, but it can
sue a foreign state. The twelfth amendment in the constitution is basically stating the procedure by which the president is elected by the electoral
college. The bigger the state is, the more representatives it will have. Depending on which candidate had the highest popular vote, is how the electors
give out their votes for the Presidential candidate. The thirteenth amendment of the constitution is a very important one throughout the history of the
United States. This amendment was added by president Abraham Lincoln abolishing slavery and involuntary servitude in the United States. Although
this law was passed, not many slaves were freed and their servitude continued for many more years due to such things as the Black Codes which
unfortunately forced African Americans to go on living like they were used to. Thanks to this amendment, a person does not have to do forced labor
in order to pay off a

Reflection On The Twenty Second Amendment Of The...
The twenty second amendment of the Constitution of United States states that, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than
twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was
elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once." I fully support this amendment and believe that it has helped our
country many times. As the book says in Chapter 6, "Popular wisdom has it that second–termers are therefore lame duck(pg.111)", I feel that this is a
very true statement. I feel that the general populations mindset that second and third terms for presidents are usually duds did not just happen
suddenly. I believe these views evolved over a longer amount of times. People began seeing presidential success fall off as the president returned to
office after their first term and formed their opinions off of these personal observations. The book confirms this idea, "Conventional wisdom holds that
second terms are fraught with peril, a view confirmed by scandals and crises in earlier presidencies... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When the president first runs for office he specifically hand picks the best of the to be on his staff. By the time the presidents second term roles
around many of these people have shown success in the presidents first term and have been recruited to hold other office and positions in the political
world, "Presidents also select the best members of the White House staff or cabinet when they first take office. When the pressure cooker of
Washington or better jobs lead those first choices away, their successors are often not their equals(pg.106)." Often times, the stress and demanding
schedule of the people that hold these offices if too much for some

The Seven Amendments
The constitution of the United States of America is the founding document on which the government of America is built. It currently has twenty–seven
amendments. It lines out the specific government practices as well as the system of check and balances. It was first drafted July, 1787 after the first
form of government, the articles of confederation, had proven very inefficient to a point where it became almost redundant to have them in place. After
a large amount of debate the acting continental congress decide to completely revise the current system. The constitution was efficient and fair and it
kept the parts of government in place while not giving too much power to one or more branches.
After outlining that, the document begins to outline the basic civil liberties and rights that the average citizen receives. These are called the
amendments. They are the foundation on what the freedom of America is built with. The amendments spell out the freedoms that Americans had,
everything from the right of religious freedoms to the right to bear arms both of which are regularly debated subjects today. They made America what
America was, the freest country in the world
Each of the amendments had their own set of rights to protect. The first protects Religion and the right to practice it. "The first amendment to the United
States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the
freedom of

Chelsea Lim. Mrs. Polich. U.S. History: Period 7. 5 April
Chelsea Lim Mrs. Polich U.S. History: Period 7 5 April 2017 U.S. Constitution Essay When America first became a country, the government used the
Articles of Confederation to govern the States, then known as the colonies. They later discovered that it did not give the central government enough
power and made it weak. So, one day at a Constitutional Convention, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Founding Fathers came up with the
Constitution for the new, growing country, and We the People. After they debated, discussed, and compared points and topics, they finally ratified the
Constitution and Bill of Rights in 1791. The Preamble, also known as the introduction to the US Constitution, provides significant constitutional
interpretation for... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The duties of the of the president is being the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, Chief Legislative, Chief Executive, Chief of Party, and Chief
of State. The duties of the Vice–President is to be leader of the Senate, and next in command if something happens to the President. The advisors of
the Executive Branch is Congress and the fifteen cabinet or secretaries. While we have someone that can enforce those laws, we need people that can
clarify those laws. The Judicial branch consists of justices and courts in the US, and their job is to interpret the laws created by Congress. The highest
court of the US is the Supreme Court and the title of those who serve on the high court is associate judges. There are nine judges, eight associate
judges and one chief judge. Those judges are appointed by the president, approved by the senate, and serve for life. There are ninety one district courts
and twelve appeal courts. Courts have jurisdiction over the Constitution, federal laws, treaties. Laws governing ships, the United States government
itself, ambassadors or public ministers, two or more state government, citizens of different states, and a state or its citizens versus a foreign country.
There are a total of twenty seven amendments in the US constitution. The first ten are known as the Bill of Rights, and the other seventeen

The Second Amendment To The Constitution And The First...
]The constitution, it is quite possibly the largest piece of the puzzle that makes America what it is. This document allows the American people to be
who they are. The constitution and its amendments outline the rules that are to be followed by and the rights that are given to the people and the
government. The first amendment to the constitution is one that never seems to be debated itself, but its interpretation is often times debated. In
saying this I mean that most everyone agrees that people should have the right to free speech, but what is often debated is where to draw the line.
The question is, what is the difference is between someone using their right to free speech and them spewing hate speech. The first amendment is
quite possibly the most important to maintaining our form government. It allows us, the people to have a say and speak on political topics among
other things. The full first amendment, which was officially put into place alongside the second amendment in 1791, is made up of, for the most
part, two basic points. It touches on religion and preventing freedom of speech or press "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The first of these points that touches on religion was first formed based upon one of the
main reasons that

The US History: The Articles Of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation was an agreement made between the thirteen original states that was ratified in 1781, and superseded by The
Constitution of the United States in 1789 ("Confederation, Articles of"). The Articles of Confederation was the first U.S. written constitution. The need
for the Constitution was because it gave basic human rights to all citizens, and The Articles of Confederation did not. The creation of The Constitution
began on May 25, 1787, and was made to take the place of The Articles of Confederation.
The Constitution was a major part of U.S. history. Fifty–five delegates from the various states met in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787 to discuss the
making of a constitution that would take the place of the Articles of

The Issue Of Gun Ownership
Despite the harms associated with handguns, the Second Amendment, which states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed", protects the private ownership of them. The Supreme Court has
consistently ruled against gun bans or regulations as violating the 2nd amendment. In the landmark ruling Heller vs. District of Columbia in 2008, the
Supreme Court ruled that a thirty–two year ban on the private ownership of handguns in the District of Columbia was unconstitutional. The Supreme
Court decided that the Second Amendment implies that the government cannot enact an outright ban on commonly held weapons or prevent citizens
from having... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He continues, "The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now."
An accurate reading of the Constitution, Madison said, requires "resorting to the sense in which the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the
nation" because "In that sense alone it is the legitimate Constitution." Furthermore, the American people risk losing everything the document provides,
from freedom of speech to freedom of religion to the right to a trial by jury, if one section of the Constitution is redacted. To maintain the document and
the liberties that it grants requires a textual reading of the Constitution, and consequently, upholding the Second Amendment. To enact a national
handgun ban would be to ignore constitutionalism and would greatly damage the democratic legitimacy of the U.S. government. A national handgun
ban violates the principles of federalism found in the Tenth Amendment. The Constitution creates a federal government of enumerated powers and give
states the right to make laws regarding everything else. The federal government has the power to regulate commercial transactions regarding guns such
as background checks under the commerce clause, but the banning of ownership grabs police power that the Constitution leaves to the

The Pros And Cons Of Mass Shootings
The First Amendment of the Constitution says that the Congress cannot make a law that forces people to follow one religion or prohibit free speech.
It also says that people have the right to hold peaceful assemblies to make a change. This allows people to have opinions and express them freely as
long as they are peaceful.
The article connects to the First Amendment because the NFL players are protesting what they believe in and using freedom of speech. If Congress
made a law to throw players in jail who kneeled during the national anthem it would violate the United States Constitution. But, while the First
Amendment protects them from being sent to jail, they could still be fired from the NFL. By this point, however, it would be ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This article talks about Venezuela's President NicolГЎs Maduro wanting to rewrite the country's constitution, originally written in 1999. The exact
changes that would be made to the document are not known, but citizens and leaders of both Venezuela and theUnited States, including President
Trump, believe it will make the government too much like Cuba's. Cuba has a communist government that controls everything. There will be a vote
that many people plan on boycotting, and there have been many protests from all the people who do not want the President of Venezuela to go through
with the changes. These strikes are dangerous and have ended up killing many people.
The Twenty–Sixth Amendment of the Constitution reduces the voting age to eighteen years old. It says that a citizen who is eighteen or older cannot
be denied the ability to vote by any state because of their age. Until this, in most states, citizens had to be twenty–one years old to vote.
The article and this amendment connect in certain ways. Many Venezuelans do not like their President's plan to make changes to their country's
constitution. If something like this were to happen in the United States, and citizens were angry at the idea, the people's voice would need to be heard.
With the voting age at eighteen years old, more people could vote against the plan to show the government just how many citizens disagree with
making changes to the

Term Limits
Living in the present and looking back at the past, we as citizens see what has worked and what can be improved; Congress is a good example of
this. Some may say that Congress is a failure and some may be happy and proud of the way it functions and runs our country. For those who do not
approve of it, the idea is to start fresh and get new ideas, people and habits into office. With the way Congress works today, that may not be the
easiest tasks. In order to make changes in Congress, time is needed; a significant change cannot be made over night and expect it to run smoothly. One
of the ways to bring change and settle the debate of whether or not to 'restart Congress' is to set term limits on congressional members. There should be
term... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pork–barrel spending, special interest of their own state, and how can they make themselves look good are thing that will be on their mind at some
point. Setting term limits would allow Congress to become more of a "citizen" Congress because more everyday people, not just the wealthy, would
be running for office (balancedpolitics.org). New Politian's would not have time to find loop holes or exploit the system because they would be
focusing on what they need to get done in order to make their constituents happy. One of the major benefits to term limits is the potential for new
ideas rolling through Congress, and Politian's with a more focused mind set. The founding fathers did their part of making sure no one person is given
too much power by ensuring that the United States has checks and balances. The 22nd Amendment has contributed to the checks and balances by
limiting presidents to two terms in office. Term limits should also be in place for congressional members. This may be another way to ensure no
congressional member ever has too much power within the government. Candidates would be running for the purpose to the serve people and not to
just benefit themselves. Term limits would also stop the political reward and power abuse within Congress, leading to committees being assigned to
individuals based on merit and their expertise to make informed decisions. Doing all

The Bill Of Rights And The Amendment Of The Constitution
In 1976, The Declaration of Independence was signed by Thomas Jefferson and included the Bill of rights that provided us with Freedom (Schweikart,
2004). The bill of rights was established so each citizen is equally treated and allowed to share their idea and not be disgraced for it (Bodenhamer,
1993). The first ten amendments to the constitution of the United States established basic American civil liberties (Schweikart, 2004). The Bill of rights
and the amendments of the constitution were written about the same time by the same people. The Bill of Rights and amendments both focused on
limitation of state tyranny. The Bill of rights has been used for defining civil liberties in their own constitution (Bill of Rights, 2015). The Bill of rights
is a document consisting of the constitution's first ten amendments (Yero, 2006). What is a bill of rights? The Bill of Rights are sections of the
constitution, which include the first ten amendments of the constitution. On September 25, 1789, Congress transmitted to the state Legislatures twelve
proposed amendments to the Constitution, Numbers three through twelve were adopted by the states, later name the Bill of Rights (Schweikart, 2004).
The Bill of rights plays a central role in America's law and government. The Bill of rights lists specific freedoms that the government cannot threaten or
take away ("U.S. Bill of Rights", 2015). When the constitution was written, many states already had a bill of right established (Yero, 2006).

Amendments of the U.S. Constitution
Amendments of the U.S. Constitution HIS/301 Amendments of the U.S. Constitution The United States Constitution is a beloved document of this
country. In this document many powers, liberties, and freedoms are given to the citizens of the United States of America. These citizens were first
made up of immigrants or settlers from England who wanted a place to live without fear of death, and freedom of liberties. The people who made up
the first colonies of the America's fought long and hard through many generations to get to the point they were at writing the Constitution. Though
writing the Constitution was the "icing on the cake" for those who lived in America and those looking to live in America, there was a time when the
original... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are many different practicing religions in America because of the first amendment. The Bill of Rights also made it possible for a movement to
begin that we now call "Women's Liberation," eventually giving women the right to vote. The fact that the right of freedom of speech was a protected
right made it easier for people to speak out about injustices. The civil rights movement was because of the proposed unconstitutionality of some laws
that went against the portion called the Bill of Rights. The fight for civil rights was won because people knew that the equality of people was not being
met as the Constitution provided for. More than two hundred years later there are still ongoing effects from the Bill of Rights adoption to the
Constitution. Amendments Twelve, Twenty
–Two, and Twenty–Five To date there are Twenty–Seven Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The three
that I will be addressing here all have to deal with the Presidency of the United States. In the original Constitutional document the structure of the
government was addressed, including the office of the Presidency. It is assumed by many that any issues with the Presidency would have been
addressed when the Constitution was drafted. The need for amendments was noticed by the drafters of the Constitution, and no part of the Constitution
was without scrutiny, or error. In Article II of the Constitution it states there is to be a President,

Compare And Contrast Nevada Constitution And Us Constitution
Constitutions are ordinances set forth by a legislative body to establish the foundations of a government. The United States of America wrote their
constitution to set the rules in place for the branches of government, their separate powers, and the limitations of the federal government. Since the
United States operates under a federalist government, each state is responsible for establishing their own governments. There arise the states'
constitutions. There are inevitable differences between the content of a constitution of a state versus that of the federal government. In this essay, we
will be comparing the constitution of the state of Nevada and that of the United States of America. There are differences in the branches of government,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Constitution are called the Bill of Rights, they outlined the civil liberties as a citizen of the United States. Civil liberties are the restrictions of
powers the government has on the citizens. For example, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, no government established religion, and the right
to a jury trial are all examples of liberties the government cannot deny its citizens. According to the Supreme Court case Barron v. Baltimore in 1833,
none of the provisions in the Bill of Rights applied to the states, they only applied to the federal government and their restrictions (Bowers 43).
However, the authors of Nevada's 1864 constitution included their own Bill of Rights named the Declaration of Rights. The Declaration of Rights
included all of the same principles that the Bill of Rights did such as the ones listed above. There are two significant differences between the two sets of
amendments. For one, the Nevada constitution requires compensation before the government can seize private property, the U.S. constitution does not
have the same requirement. Second, civil cases in Nevada only require a three–fourths vote to make a decision, federal civil cases require a unanimous
decision. However, in criminal cases, both Nevada and the federal government require a unanimous

Gun Control Arguments
Different people have different opinions on the topic of bearing weapons. Some people believe that owning of weapons such as guns is good because
it will help them against criminals while others feel that they should be banned. However, in June 2008, in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller,
the United States Supreme Court ruled that people were allowed to keep guns for self–defense (Neily III, 2010). This was one of the most important
rulings on gun rights since the adoption of Second Amendment in 1791 on Bill of Rights. The second Amendment ofUnited States Constitution states
that in a Free State, peoples' right to bear and keep arms shall not be infringed. There have been many cases when the court has been engaged in
interpreting the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The court reached this decision after gun owners managed to present sufficient evidence that showed why they should be allowed to carry guns and
therefore restricting them is violation of their constitution rights. The federal court was called to decide the case after courts of lower jurisdiction
failed to agree if the law that govern owning of firearms should be uphold. In addition, the court also agreed that the Second Amendment laws demand
states to allow people to use firearms outside their homes. Furthermore, it was held that it is not necessary for a state to enact laws that will ensure that
the guns will be carried when they are concealed (Woodruff, 2014). The author of this article further states that even if the court ruled out in favor of
the Second Amendment, there is need for a discussion on how California will regulate gun rights. According to ABA Journal author by the name
Martha Nell, on the issue of gun rights, she stated that the constitution is being violated and there is need for an open discussion in order to honor it.
Furthermore, the court agreed that California Laws on gun controls were violating people rights as they are stipulated in Second Amendment
(Woodruff, 2014). The court also recommended the need for amending these laws so that they will stop conflicting with the

Essay on Should the 22nd Admendment be Repealed
In the political world today there are so many different opinions about several different topics. The topics that I will address to you will be, should the
22nd Amendment be repealed and also should the foreign born be allowed to run for president. In both topics you may have your pros and cons, but I
am strongly against the both of them because I feel that the Constitution should not be taken advantage of. Government should not be allowed to
manipulate the Constitution to suit his or her needs. While making adjustments to the Constitution to allow different things to take place for convenience
doesn't leave any form respect of the Constitution. There should be a line drawn to keep this from happening for years to come on these issues and ...
American people are use to being able to vote for a new president especially if the one that is in office is not doing a good job for the people. I like
the way it is because when we limit it to only two terms it helps bring in qualified people with new views and that may have a different outlook on
how things are being handled in the White House. Conflict will arise either way you choose to go and personally I think that if it isn't broke why try
to fix it. We as voters enjoy exercising our right to vote, but I strongly feel that the government has the right to put who it wants in office no matter
what. So, presidents having limits on how long they can run is our savior because sometimes you can vote and vote and your voice remain unheard.
In addition to the 22nd amendment being repealed, there have been several talks about also allowing foreign born to run for president. According to
the USA Today, polls aren't showing favor for putting someone born in a foreign country in the top position as the President of the United States
(Kasindorf, Martin, 2004) Also, according to the polls taken on USA Today 31% were for such an amendment, and 67% were against it (Kasindorf,
Martin). It is said that while mentioning

Essay On Bill Of Rights

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Victoria Thompson

More from Victoria Thompson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Bill Of Rights