Juror 8 Reflection

Juror 8 Reflection
For Juror 8 to stand up for what he believes in was pretty incredible. All the Jurors there wanted to have this case end by having a 12 out of 12 vote,
but that did not happen. First, Juror 8 thought that an 18 year old boy that stabbed his father was innocent. I do not think he is innocent at all.
depends on what the boy was doing before he stabbed his father. For example, was he taking drugs or drinking before he did this crime. It all comes
done to the fact that this boy was abused when he was little by his father. Also, my thoughts about this is since he was abused, he fought back with
fire. You should not fight fire with fire. Instead you should get help and go to someone you trust to help you through this problem. Lastly, this whole
case from what I learned depends of Memory and Justice System. For example, you have to have great memory to remember the little details like
where you were at that time of what object you used to kill the person. Our Justice System has a powerful impact on the justice system. Jurors tend to
have a strong and bad view on that person.
When Juror 8 thought the boy was innocent the other Jurors disagreed. To begin ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To start with, I think that sometimes people make mistakes like what I thought about the eyewitnesses. When you test something to show guilty you
have to make mistakes and do the process over and over again. Recreating the scene helps understand how the killer did this crime. I think it helps
remember where you were, what you were doing and how you did it. Next, some eyewitnesses can take back their testimony. For example, I think
eyewitnesses can miss information by giving wrong information. By giving wrong information it can become part of your memory. Lastly, there is a
scene that all the jurors vote 6 to 6. People can change their views on voting guilty or not guilty. When a juror say guilty or that person is sentenced in
jail or prison for as long as they are
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

White V Jones Case
Abstract:
The case of White v Jones [1995] is a famous case in the English tort law which concerns the liability of solicitors to the beneficiaries of the will with
whom they have no contractual relationship if they performed their work negligently. This case raises the questions of professionalnegligence, the third
party beneficiary (relationship) and the duty of care. In the case of White v Jones the Court of Appel followed the statement of Vice–Chancellor
Megarry in Ross v Caunters [1980] : "In considering the liability question, it is of the utmost importance to keep in mind that if there is no liability,
the result is striking: the only person who has a valid claim against the solicitor has suffered no loss, and the only person ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Who, then, in law, is my neighbour? The answer seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to
have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question."
The principles in Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] and Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] was confirmed in White v Jones [1995] .
The significance of the case of Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] lies in the Caparo test which is stated by Lord Bridge:
"What emerges is that, in addition to the foreseeability of damage, necessary ingredients in any situation giving rise to a duty of care are that there
should exist between the party owing the duty and the party to whom it is owed a relationship characterised by the law as one of "proximity" or
"neighbourhood" and that the situation should be one in which the court considers it fair, just and reasonable that the law should impose a duty of a
given scope upon the one party for the benefit of the

The Reign Of Elizabeth I
The reign of Elizabeth I was the period during which the trade systems overseas and expansion of exploration was occurring and England had
become a great power and one of the biggest influences on the world. It was the period in which most of the industrial development took place
which in turn led to many many technological innovations. It was also the period during which humanity subjects like literature, theatre, music
flourished, with likes of Shakespeare and William Byrd. Considering all the advancements that took place in the elizabethan era it is probably true
to call it a "Golden Age". Even Though, by the end of Elizabeth 's reign the economy was in pieces, poverty and unemployment was on the rise and
there was also a decline in the toleration of religion. Elizabeth I had also become very unpopular by the end of her reign as compared to the first
thirty years. It is probably easy to say that the reign of Queen Elizabeth I was something a bit like a mixture between good and bad but more "gold"
than "metal". Elizabeth can be considered as one of England 's greatest monarchs if not the greatest. Her reign caused a widespread reform and
increase in subjects like literature and increased literacy. Some great achievements in the arts were of people like Shakespeare, Spenser, Marlowe,
Ralegh. Her victory in military conquests over threatened invasions all depict how as wise and just she was. She was believed to have good advisers
but she was known not to have her judgement

Case Comment : Martin Walsh V ' Fiscal
Case Comment Case: William Donnelly, Martin Walsh v Procurator Fiscal [2015] HCJAC 35 (HCJAC) Donnelly v Dunn Two Celtic fans who
were convicted for singing the "Roll of Honour" under the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act 2012
asp 1 ('the Act') have had their Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms appeal rejected. The Facts In
2014 the appellants were convicted for contravening section 1 of the Act for singing the "Roll of Honour" at a football match between Hibernian
and Celtic in 2013. The song had provoked the Hibernian fans. The Sherriff found "the singing was likely or would be likely to incite public
disorder" and that the appellants "threatening and offensive" behaviour was in breach of the section. Donnelly and Walsh were granted leave on a
point of law and appealed the conviction to the High Court stating they were unaware the song was regarded as threatening or offensive , therefore a
possible breach of their rights may have taken place under Article 7 of the ECHR. Article 7 states "no punishment without law" and the appellants
claimed there was uncertainty about the song falling under the Act. They contended they should not be held criminally liable, being unaware their
actions constituted an offence. The appeal was rejected, the Judge ruling the appellants must have known their behaviour was likely to be a criminal
offence, likely to incite public disorder and to

Assess The Theme Of The Poem Judgement
The theme that my poem is mainly focused on, is judgement. I've chosen this theme because of the strong underlying message left to society through
this theme. As humans we are judged for many things such as social, racial, and/or class differences. In general we often tend to judge others because
of our own viewpoints or prejudices that can be environmental (i.e. upbringings/social interactions and this tendency goes coupled with the mentality to
deem anything we view as being different, to be inferior. In present–day society, many feel afraid to speak up and convey their thoughts, because they
are afraid of being judged and what people may think or say about them. It limits one's self–expression and can possibly hold back self–growth as an

12 Angry Men Conflicts Essay
Twelve Angry Men (1957) showed several example of conflicts within the film. I will examine how each conflict was managed, which conflicts were
resolved and how, along with the kinds of effects each of these conflicts caused in the film.
3 Types of Conflict
There are three types of conflict are shown within the film Twelve Angry Men. Pseudo, simple, and ego are the three types of interpersonal conflict
displayed by the twelve jurors. In the small group of twelve jurors, each member of the jury is involved in at least one of the three types of conflict.
Beginning with juror number eight, the first man to vote not guilty in the case, he was the first to start a conflict.
Davis, as he was identified at the end of the film, was the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Juror one, the foreman helped to keep the group orderly and the arguments from escalating further. The tenth juror was an obnoxious man with and
prejudice towards people from the slums.
His prejudice caused conflict with all of the other jury members and after some time he too changed his vote to not guilty. The stock broker with the
glasses was the eleventh juror to vote not guilty. He was the fourth juror and self assured that his decision was correct and that the defendant had
murdered his father. He was involved in simple conflict with the rest of the jurors.
Juror 3
Juror three, labeled as the sadist, was the last man to vote not guilty and held on to his guilty decision because of his ego. Juror three was involved in
ego conflict with most of the other men. However, juror three was especially excitable and in defense of his ego against juror eight. It was not until
the end of the film that juror three finally realized that his ego was the only reason why he was voting not guilty.
His troubled past with his own son was the cause of his disdain towards the young man on trial in the murder of his father. Juror three took the
situation of the trial personally and therefore his own critical thinking was impaired by his basis. Once he realized he was not being attacked
personally by the other jury members his ego broke down and he then changed his vote to not

The Judicial Process Of Course
fairness in the judicial process of course, a jury alone does not guarantee a fair and impartial trial.
VIIII– Prosecutors' role in civil law and common law systems
A–Prosecutor in civil law systems
The Public Prosecution has two major functions, which are to file criminal actions when acting as public prosecutors before a criminal court and the
right to initiate actions, even if the plaintiff has relinquished his right to do so, public prosecutors exanimate crimes, visit crimes' scenes, question the
accused, issue search warrants, and order the imprisonment of the accused on the account of a crime for a period of fifteen days prior to trial or
prosecution. Moreover, joining the public prosecution is the way to becoming a judge in the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal, and the Court
of Cassation. Nevertheless, some members of the Public Prosecution remain within the latter and get promoted to District Attorneys, Attorney Generals,
and potentially qualify for the post of the Head of the Public Prosecution.
Prosecutor has a different role and position in those countries that they practice civil law system. Contrary to the sitting judges who are totally
independent, public prosecutors are under the authority of the minister of justice, the minister of justice conducts the policy of prosecution determined
by the Government. The public prosecutors are considered to embody one single person since they act in the name of the prosecution

James VI & I's Desire to Create a Perfect Union Between...
James VI & I's Desire to Create a Perfect Union Between Scotland and England
After succeeding the English thrown in 1603, James VI & I of Scotland and England aimed to create the 'perfect union'. In 1604 he proclaimed
himself king of Britain and attempted full unification of the nations. This was to involve uniting the Scottish and English parliaments, the church and
the legal systems. It also included free trade, repeal of hostile laws and the renewal of borders. James's plan to create a perfect union was not to be
successful for numerous reasons. This essay will discuss the opposing views held by the Scottish and English parliaments and the objections from the
church. It will consider the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Scotland was, after all, a poor nation and full unification would provide the benefits of, 'strength, peace and security' for Britain and he himself would
be known for his greatness on a European level.[3] James somewhat achieved this as, 'French and Venetian ambassadors were impressedГўв‚¬В¦by the
extent of the king's authority'.[4]
James was determined to succeed with the full unification of Scotland and England. In April 1604, the Commons were asked to consider his new title
as that of king of Britain. Their objection to do so deeply offended James as he considered it his right. Decisions were delayed because the union
was imperfect and many were unclear as to exactly what it would involve. Commons were weary of James because he intervened in such a way they
had not been used to. As he made use of his full powers, some were classifying it as, 'unwarranted interference in their affairs'.[5] With the continual
postponing of the acknowledgement of James's position, he exercised his right of royal prerogative and proclaimed himself king of Great Britain in
October 1604.
His intentions of full unification were made known in his persuasive opening speech to Parliament when he said, 'What God hath conjoined let no
man separate. I am the husband and all the whole isle is my lawful wife. I am the head and it is the body. I am the shepherd and it is the flock. I hope,

Queen Elizabeth I Of England
Elizabeth sat in her bedroom in the Buckingham palace brushing her long, curly, red hair which was stained with strands of gray. She focused on
the mirror and softly stared at the freckles on her pale skin, which looked as if it needed to be ironed, and her dark brown eyes that looked like a
black hole against her pale complexion. The year was 1587, Elizabeth had gone through so much to be here. Oh, my mistake, I should probably refer
to her by her formal name. The Elizabeth of this daring story full of anger and spite is none other than Queen Elizabeth I of England. To tell the full
story though, we must travel back some 50 years to when Elizabeth was only 3 years old. The year is 1536, her mother, Anne Boleyn, has failed to
produce a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The year is 1553, after some long and confusing years of switching between rulers, Queen Mary I, also known as Bloody Mary, came into power. Mary
was the first child of King Henry VIII (Elizabeth 's father if you forgot) but King Henry changed the religion of the country from Catholic to
Protestant just so that he could divorce Mary 's mother. After the divorce, Mary was declared illegitimate, same as Elizabeth. After some rather
confusing years in England 's history, Mary rose to power and claimed the throne in 1553 as what the Catholics believed to be the rightful heir of
the throne. Here is why she has the nickname "Bloody Mary." She reversed the religion of England from Protestant back to Catholic and then she
burned over 280 religious dissenters at the stake in the Marian persecutions in only a short 5 year reign. The year is 1558, Elizabeth came into power
after her sister, Mary died. But the rode to keeping the title of queen will not be easy. Elizabeth made the country back into Protestant, which many
resented her for. More than just religion, Elizabeth refused to marry, and soon became known as the "Virgin Queen". This provided another conflict for
Elizabeth, many believed a woman was unfit to rule a country and wanted another ruler. But, her biggest conflict was with her cousin, Mary Stuart,
Queen of Scots, who just so happened to be Catholic. Here, let me explain to you why these two woman are perfect arch enemies. Of course

To A Mouse, By Robert Burns
The poem "To a Mouse" by Robert Burns shows how man has become exalted above other living creatures. The poem was written in the 1700s in
Scotland and has a mood of friendly compassion in the Scottish Dialect which it's written in. The major theme embedded throughout the poem is
hierarchy in nature, which is where creatures are separated based on their intelligence and strength to survive.
The first difference that separates the mouse and the man is their strength to survive. The man discovers the mouse stealing corn from him because he
can't find food to survive the brutal winter. Because of this line: "I doubt na, whyles, but thou may thieve" (Burns 13), it shows the man is the strongest
and most intelligent character because he realizes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When things aren't equal or they are condensed into a hierarchy; it creates oppression, violence, hatred and suffering in our society. This is found in the
quote: "I'm truly sorry man's dominion, Has broken nature's social union" (Burns 7–8). A real world example is the way America's meat industry treats
animals cruelly by not giving them a proper life before we use them as food, we should care for them more and treat them as a gift and our equal.
The last stanzas explain the downside for the man being on top of the hierarchy of nature. It reads: "Still thou art blest, compar'd wi' me/ The present
only toucheth thee" (Burns 43–44). The mouse is blessed compared with the man because the present only touches it and it doesn't have the capability
to worry or fear from the past or future. The themes in "To a Mouse" developed throughout the poem to show all aspects of the hierarchy of nature: the
struggles of the weak, the downside of the strong and the way these two aspects balance the hierarchy of

Rivalry Of Elizabeth
Rivalry between Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots
Religion is a main reason why Elizabeth executed Mary. Evidence which supports this reason is that some English Catholics would have preferred
Mary as Queen of England. This would have made Elizabeth feel as she would need to execute Mary because Mary gave Catholics a reason to rebel
against Elizabeth. Elizabeth was a protestant queen and most Catholics preferred a queen of their own belief. Thus, this was the best time to rebel
against Elizabeth and gain a new catholic queen who lead the country. All they had to do, was releasing her from imprisonment. An argument in
support of this evidence is that in 1570 the Pope issued a Bull ordering. Catholics should disobey Elizabeth because she was heretic. Catholics must
follow the Pope and believe in him as the legitimate head of church. McLaren describes that not solely the papal bull had consequences in the year
1570, but also James Stewart's assassination:
If the near conjunction of the papal bull and the Northern Rebellion does not explain the change in character of English anti–Catholicism, 1570 still
remains a key date in its career. The key event, however, belongs to a British history whose parameters and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This would give the Catholics courage to take Elizabeth off the throne and crown a catholic queen instead, as this is what the Pope wanted. A
further piece of evidence is the Northern rebellion of 1569. It was a catholic attempt to replace Elizabeth with Mary. This would have made
Elizabeth feel that she would need to execute Mary because this event happened so quickly as she has only been there for a year. Mary did not agree
to it because she knew it would fail. Religion links to other factors such as dynastic reasons, because Mary said she was the rightful Queen of England
and Elizabeth was illegitimate because the Catholics did not believe in

Summary Of A Red Rose By Robert Burns
Robert Burns "A Red Red Rose" On the romanticism era Robert Burns wrote the poem named "A Red Red Rose." In this poem Burns writes about his
love for a girl and how strong and deep it is for her, as he says " I will love thee still my dear, till a' the seas gang dry." Robert Burns was born on
January 25th, 1759 in Alloway Scotland. Parents William Burns and Agnes Broun, his parents were farmers, though they lived in that life of farming
they wanted their son Robert Burns to have and receive a good education and when he started getting the education they wanted him to have, burns also
started to read more and started to have a huge place in his heart for poetry. Burns father died in 1784 in bankruptcy and then bruns and his brother
Gilbert took over the farm, but that didn't stop him from reading and getting influenced by different famous people. He was influenced by different
poets like Alexander Pope, Henry Mackenzie, and Laurence Sterne; His hard physical labour on the family is what increasingly turned his
attention toward the passion of poetry. Robert Burns turned his full attention to poetry after what happened with his family and at age of fifteen
he fell in love and wrote his first poem, burns pursued both love and poetry. In 1785 he fathered the first of his fourteen children and between 1784
and 1785 burns collected in his first collection which was Chiefly in the Scottish Dialect and was printed in 1786 and was also paid for by
subscriptions. That poem was immediately one of the best and robert was celebrated throughout England and Scotland as a great "peasant poet." He
wrote many more poems and later in 1788 he got married to Jean Armour and fathered twins, but a split in their marriage nearly led to burns moving
to the west indies with his other lover Mary Campbell, later with Mary's sudden death and his sensational success of his first published collection that
kept him in scotland, burns became very known and famous across the country of scotland at just 27 years old. Burns would not only make poems but
would also sometimes turn them into songs and give them for someone to perform. In just 18 months Burns spent all his wealth from what he got from
when he published his poem, and

Twelve Angry Men Plot Essay
Plot: "Twelve Angry Men" is an interesting and exciting jury–room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as
twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen–year–old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late–night altercation with an
extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the session
takes its course, evidence becomes scrutinised, tempers rise, and the jury room erupts in a shouting brawl because one such juror finds reasonable
doubts in the two testimonies that were deemed credible enough to convict. In his fight for an acquittal, the singled out juror found that the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During his re–examination, he provided for the basis of his decision on which he found reasonable doubt in the testimonies. As a result, he proved the
timing to be underestimated by several seconds. Nonetheless, he maintained a subtle poise and composure during the cession, and with such
confidence, he asked for a revote. The outcome was successfully manipulated, with the votes now standing at 11 not guilty and 1 guilty.
Methods of Persuasion: The methods of persuasion used in the jury session consisted of Davis's ability to open the others' eyes to the inconsistencies
of the re–examination of the testimonies. It was a real fight to the end, because Davis could have easily given up. He begins by saying that he
"only wants to talk." He sheds some light on the other jurors when he undermines the testimony of a woman who claimed to have seen the
boy. Davis asserts that she could not have seen him at all because time was too short. With the time given, she had to wake up, and put her glasses.
They all soon found out that there was not enough time to do so. A neighbor also claimed to have been under the house of the father who and said he
heard the murder. Shortly thereafter, the man said he ran outside and saw the boy in a matter

The Duty Of Easy Rescue
The duty of easy rescue is perhaps one of the most heavily debated and most controversial topics in criminal law. The origin of this duty is Biblical
and it aims to punish the so–called 'bad Samaritan' who fails to render assistance to a person in peril . Unlike the Anglo–American jurisdictions , most
European states recognise the duty of easy rescue, albeit to different extents . Scots law per se does not impose a duty of easy rescue on ordinary
citizens and failure to act constitutes a criminal offence only in exceptional circumstances; these include ex gratia close proximity relationships . In
this essay, the author will purport to elucidate whether Scots law shall impose a duty of easy rescue, and if so, to what extent shall such duty be
recognised in Scotland.
2. Scots law and failure to act? As aforementioned, Scots law does not impose criminal liability for failure to act, except in certain limited
circumstances. These include both common law rules and statutory enactments. There are four instances at common law which give rise to criminal
liability for failure to act, i.e., duties arising from close proximity relationships such as parent and child, voluntary assumption of responsibility,
creation of dangerous situations or contractual duties . In Bone v HMA , a pregnant mother was found to be under a duty to save her child from the
attacks of her violent partner . Per contra, in R v Instan and R v Stone and Dobinson the court held that when voluntarily assuming

Case Analysis : Sue Stockfans Pty Ltd
I INTRODUCTION
Ronald, the plaintiff, could sue Stockfans Pty Ltd ('Stockfans'), the defendant, in negligence for the failure to implement a proper fire safety system in
their shopping centre which caused personal injury to the plaintiff in the form of a severe respiratory condition. Negligence occurs when a defendant
has a legal duty to take care and breaches that duty (Stockfans) causing damage to the plaintiff (Ronald).
II ELEMENTS OF NEGLIGENCE
A Duty of Care Is Owed
A defendant will only be held liable, in negligence, 'in circumstances where the law imposes a duty of such care.' The occupier of a premises owes a
duty of care to 'take reasonable care for the safety' of all entrants and is said to be any person who exercises ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The 'precise injury', 'extent' of the harm, 'the manner of its infliction' or the 'likelihood of the harm' occurring are 'not relevant' to section 5B(1); 'only
that there is not an insignificant chance of harm.' A risk that is not insignificant is 'a risk that is of a higher probability than' indicated by the phrase
'far–fetched and fanciful, not so high as' indicated by the phrase 'a substantial risk' and not a 'synonym for significant'.
It's foreseeable that the risk that harm of some kind could occur to Ronald, and others in the shopping centre, due to the failure to implement a
proper fire safety system and is a risk of which Stockfans 'knew or ought to have known'. Provided the email was received, it's reasonable to
conclude that Stockfans knew about the risk as Sally, a customer of the shopping centre, had sent an email to Stockfans advising them that the fire
doors were wedged open, expressing her concerns about the associated safety risk. Given it's unnecessary for the precise harm, its extent and the
manner of its infliction to be foreseen, Ronald's harm was reasonably foreseeable. However, if Sally's email was not

Queen Elizabeth 1588 Essay
ELIZABETH I. AGAINST THE SPANISH ARMADA. 1588
This oration is both a political speech and a narrative text. It was given by Queen Elizabeth the 1st of England on august the 9th of 1588 to her troops
at Tilbury, Essex.
The purpose and intention of this speech was to support and motivate her soldiers just before they go off to battle to face in those days what was
known as to be one of the greatest powers in all of Europe the Spanish Armada. Led by Phillip II of Spain and the Duke of Parma (his nephew).
This particular version of the speech that I will be commenting on is accepted as being authentic and it has become the most famous one. It was
recorded by Dr. Leonel Sharp (1559–1631) an English churchman and archdeacon of Berkshire in a letter to the Duke of Buckingham a bit after 1623.
This letter was then published in the Cabala in 1654. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the versions was recorded by William Leigh (1550–1639) an English clergyman and royal tutor around 1612. Another one appears beneath the
painting Elizabeth at Tilbury in Saint FaithВґs church, Gaywood, Norfolk. These two are practically the same speech and then there is James AskeВґs
version published in 1558 in Elizabetha Triumphans apparently he was a soldier and also present like Sharp at Tilbury.
There is substantial evidence proofing that ElizabethВґs speech is genuine and that she really did appear in front of her soldiers riding on a white horse,
wearing shining armour and giving a rousing speech as it was said by some. Nome the less throughout the years writers and historians have had their
doubts whether she really stood in front of her troops at Tilbury.
Lady Elizabeth Tudor who later became Queen Elizabeth I, something she never imagined would happen, became the ruler of England and was
crowned Queen on January the 15th 1559, she reigned from 1558 to

The Thane Of Cawdor By Stefan Reread
The Thane of Cawdor, Stefan reread the black ink that stained words onto the sandy brown paper that had been worn from old age. He pushed
back from his slouched position that had his back aching due to tense muscles in his back from stress. He didn't know what was right or wrong
anymore. A red blotch harboured his cheek where he had rested his head on his coarse hand. Growing irritated at his own behaviour, the worrying,
anxiety and confusion, he stood abruptly out of his wooden desk chair, the legs scraping against the mahogany floor boards. A sound that
resembled an animalist growl, gurgled at the back of his throat. He snatched the paper up from the office desk and it crumpled in his tightening fist.
He took his anger out on the creaky floorboards as he stomped around his castle. * Stefan's wife, Katherine peeked around the corner at her husband
as he opened the door to the attic harshly. Frowning, Kathrine scurried into his office to look through his stuff as she was suspicious of her husband's
behaviour. She feared the worst. When she made it into his office, she heaved a sigh leaning against the door that she had closed very quietly. Her
curly dark brown hair cascaded around her oval face that was etched with uneasiness. Her exquisite chocolate swirled eyes, darted around the room as
if she were expecting something, or someone to pop out and hurt her. A week ago Kathrine questioned her husband about his change of behaviour. She
hadn't expected him to lash out on

Trainspotting Theme
Trainspotting is the title on a fantastically well–made movie that's mainly about choosing a life other than the one we are accustomed to in our daily
lives. There are many reasons on how it is similar to today's society. For example, Trainspotting deals with being stuck between different choices. The
movie shows the importance of having right friends. Lastly, I liked the way mental illnesses are presented in Trainspotting. .
One of the main themes of Trainspotting is making decisions. In teen and pre–adult lives, there are a lot of choices one needs to make. There could be
anything from education to relationships: in which some people have a hard time dealing with the difficulties those choses pose. Renton, the
protagonist, rants about "choose life", and he chooses heroin as a way to escape the different choices. The times he does choose to lay off the drugs,
he experiences withdrawal symptoms, like anybody else would after quitting drugs. That's why many addict like him, try to find a way to cope with
the different choices in life, and many turn to alcohol and/or drugs for comfort. The main factor is choice, because in the end it is you who make a
choice on your life should be. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Trainspotting one gets to follow the journey of friends who found their comfort in drugs, alcohol or violence. As a young adult myself, I believe
that many times we tend to seek comfort in other people, and therefore many of us usually end up choosing the same path our "friends" encourage us
to. This could be applied to Trainspotting. Tommy, against drugs and lies, suddenly collapses when his girlfriend leaves and he tries to find comfort
in heroin just like his friends supposedly do. Since Tommy was already surrounded by addicts, it was easier for him to feel pressured into doing the
same

Why Is Juror 8 Important In 12 Angry Men
In the script of "12 Angry Men", Juror Eight often makes arguments of how the evidence was not as strong as it first appeared within the
courtroom. The most evident point of this is when the jurors are discussing how the boy must've killed his father because he had admitted to
buying a similar looking switch knife earlier that day. However, juror Eight disproved that the knife was 'one of a kind' as the store clerk said
because he went out and bought an identical one "in a little junk shop around the corner from the boy's house. It cost two dollars.". Juror Eight
continually analyzes the facts deeper than just seeping to be true or not. Not much later, he whether or not the old man in the flat below truly
could've heard "I'm going to kill you!". Juror 8 realizes that if you take the woman from across the street's testimony into account, the el train
would've been passing and it likely would've been to loud to hear anything over, especially for an old man. Juror Eight most likely used logic in this
case because it's easy to change someone's mind with facts; as people enjoy feeling secure in their decisione with something that has been proven....
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the beginning of the play, Eight is the only man to vote 'not guilty' and he stands his ground despite everyone's annoyance with him. Juror Two
argues "I think he's guilty!" to which juror Eight replies, "No reasons– just guilty. There is a life at stake here." Juror eight maintains the stream of
thought that there's a doubt of if the boy is guilty and so they shouldn't just sentence him to his death. He states later in the play, "I have a doubt in my
mind." when the other jurors state that he thinks the boy isn't guilty. Perhaps juror Eight took on this persona in order to seem comforting; someone
that can provide facts but also has emotions that will understand the influence of

12 Angry Men- Jurors 4 and 8 Essay
Reginald Rose's '12 Angry Men' brings 12 jurors together in a room to decide whether a young foreign boy is guilty of killing his father. The play is
interwoven with dynamic characterisation, striking symbolism and intense moments of drama. Although Rose positions Juror 8 as the hero, the
strongest character is in fact Juror 4, who is an independent thinker, rational and calm even as tension begins to build. Although Juror 4 initially votes
guilty, he is able to admit his fault and change his vote.
The ability to remain independent proved to be the most important character trait of Juror 4. Throughout the play, Rose's character is able to think freely
and never lets his personal bias or peer–pressure affect his decision making. When ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Juror 4 was able to communicate his ideas and thought like a professional and did so in an organised fashion. He analysed each piece of evidence with
care and used logic and his skills of deduction to guide his vote. Rose intended for the audience to realise that the not guilty vote was the right choice
and used Juror 4 as a catalyst for the final vote change.
Juror 4 is able to remain calm and composed throughout the most stressful of situations. While Juror 10 exhibits racial outbursts; "They get drunk",
"That's the way they are!", "VIOLENT!", "These people are dangerous. They're wild. Listen to me. Listen." Juror 4 sat through this entire scene
without saying a word. It is only until Juror 10's monologue is finished that Juror 4 speaks, calmly asking Juror 10 to "Shut [his] filthy mouth."
Juror 4 never discredits or implies anything towards the defendant and is always careful of what he says. After Juror 10's tirade, Juror 4 tries to
soften the impact created by 10; "Slums are potential breeding grounds for criminals." He never attacks or hypes the situation at hand. He draws
around 'potential' possibilities. Juror 4 initially had his doubts at the start of the case but was the only character that overcame his predisposition based
on the analysis of facts and evidence. Rose's character and only this character had the intelligence, confidence and persistence to keep his head in the
tense moment Juror 10 created.
Juror 8 is

What Was The Primary Cause Of The Northern Rebellion
The Northern rebellion of 1569 was the only potentially threatening rebellion of Elizabeth I's reign, led by Northern Earls who were discontent with
religious reforms and intervention in the North of England. The primary cause of this rebellion, which in this case is the cause that acted as a clear
catalyst, will be explored in this essay. The arrival ofMary Queen of Scots, the influence of William Cecil, and the religious concerns of the Northern
Earls are all important causes of the Northern Rebellion, however without a doubt in this case it was Mary's arrival in England that was the primary
cause.
Even though the Northern Earls did not want to overthrow Queen Elizabeth and replace her with Mary Queen of Scots, her arrival in England was ...
Without the presence of Mary, Queen of Scots, their Rebellion would definitely not have been as threatening to Elizabeth, and therefore probably
would not have been as impacting. Northumberland and Westmorland knew this, due to the increasing Protestant presence in the North, so judging by
this it is clear that they saw a perfect opportunity in Mary, Queen of Scots arrival. Thus, it is very likely that this arrival was the primary cause of the
rebellion, as it was the final thing that the Earls

Elizabeth I Gender Roles
Elizabeth I, the Queen of England, ruled for 44 years after her 1559 coronation. Daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn, she came to power after a
separation with the Roman Catholic Church, but governed with much stability for the duration of her reign. During this time, men were seen as vastly
superior to women in general. Add that to the fact that most of England's monarchs had previously been kings, and the previous queen was much
disliked – earning the name "Bloody Mary" from the public – gender roles were sure to be discussed during Elizabeth's rule. The ideas lower class
men had about gender put women far lower than the ideas of men in the royal court, and Elizabeth responded to these ideas by reasserting her power
and capability to rule. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When asked about a petition on the question of her succession, she responded to the Parliament by saying the Lords "have no force without [her]
authority" in order to remind them that she alone had power over the laws, and that they had none. She also commissioned several portraits, partly for
public propaganda – she described herself as the Virgin Queen (since she had no desire to be married), and ergo was dressed in light colors with
extremely fair skin. One portrait, done by Gheeraerts the Younger, portrayed her standing over a map of England, done to symbolize her ultimate
power over the country. Elizabeth gave a speech to the Parliament in 1615, once more in reference to her lack of a husband. She stated that she had a
"marriage to her kingdom". Her chaste rule was most likely due to the fact that she distrusted someone who may have taken control over England and
left her with less influence, but in this case she attempted to diffuse the Parliament's unhappiness with her solitary jurisdiction. Before the attack of the
Spanish Armada (a conflict the English would end up winning), Elizabeth spoke to her troops. Here, she reaffirmed her capabilities by saying she
"had the heart and stomach of a king", though she was a "feeble" woman, as seen in a letter from an eyewitness, in order to convince her troops of her
loyalty and ability to run

Social Host Liability Laws Are Enacted Essay
Social host liability laws are enacted to hold hosts accountable for any alcohol related injuries that were the result of the host serving alcohol to minors
(under the age of 21 for this discussion) or adults. Presently, the State of Setonia has no formalized common–law duty addressing social host liability. In
light case recently heard in the Setonia Court where a clearly intoxicated driver struck a pedestrian after departing a social gathering, it was questioned
if Setonia should seek to formulate a common–law duty for social host to prevent guests from departing a social gathering and driving while
intoxicated, impaired, or under the influence of alcohol. Two court decisions, with markedly opposed decisions, from Delaware (Shea v. Matassa,
2007) and North Carolina (Hart v. Ivey, 1992), were reviewed in anticipation of the potential formulation of a common–law duty of a social host to
prevent guests from departing a social gathering and driving while intoxicated, impaired or under the influence of alcohol. BRIEF ANSWER The State
of Setonia should recognize the social host liability and develop the common–law duty of social hosts to prevent their guests, though reasonable care
concept, from operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or while intoxicated. FACTS The State of Setonia has yet to resolve the
issue of social host liability and potentially develop a common–law duty of social host to prevent guests who are intoxicated, impaired or under

Armada Portrait Analysis
Elizabeth I, queen of England, was very strategic in the way she presented herself to the public. In my short story, The Queen's Decision, Elizabeth's
public and private selves are evident and occasionally contrast with each other, especially during the decision to execute Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots.
Publicly, the Tudor queen had a strong aversion to beheadingMary Stuart, but her personal insights depict hostility to the fellow queen.
Elizabeth sitting on a throne made of silk from Asia, in reference to England's colonial power. The Armada portrait was a public display to spread a
positive image of the queen as propaganda and to showcase the Tudor queen's strength. Similar to Elizabeth's Armada portrait in which she places her
hand on the globe (particularly North America), Elizabeth is placed directly on colonized land (Asian silk), portraying England's power over other
nations. In this instance, Elizabeth's publicly demonstrates her power and her physical embodiment of England in a subtle, meaningful way.
Furthermore, Elizabeth is dressed in a "gold and white gown with pearls lining the bodice," inspired by the Armada portrait again. Dubbed as the
virgin queen, white and pearls are both indicative of virginity and chastity, with gold being symbolic of wealth. Also, pearls are linked with the moon,
an entity that is difficult to reach and having immense influence over others, similar to Elizabeth herself. Having pearls line the bodice, where the heart
and stomach "designate the inward seat of passion, emotion, secret thoughts, affections, or feelings," (OED) illustrates Elizabeth's ability to restrain her
biological urges. Elizabeth's natural body intersects with the body politic, in that her natural body is utilized to present a political ideal of her being in
control.
William Cecil mentions Mary's plots against Elizabeth, notably the three major plots she is suspected of committing during her imprisonment in
England. The Ridofli Plot, The Throgmorton Plot and the Babington Plot are the "three times" Mary attempted to kill Elizabeth, with her involvement
in the Babington Plot leading to her execution.
In Elizabeth's letter to William Cecil, April 11, 1572, she doesn't want to rush any "irrevocable

Summary Of The Queen ':The Bloody Queens'
"The Bloody Queens"
Evil, corruption, power, and hate. Only the biggest hypocrites could pull off such a deceitful time where they made each other suffer. Where they saw
the climax of their life flash before their eyes... Queen Elizabeth I and Queen Mary of Scots had just figured out they were cousins when the time for
their tremendous lust for the crown begun and the fight between each other started behind a desk... Where lifting a hand could lead to a vicious murder
that ended the feud between these two unbelievably bloody queens.
Queens have always meant to govern well, be perfect, and be loved by everyone. Most of them were very good at it. That is why Queen Elizabeth and
Mary were the best hypocrites of all time. Mary and Elizabeth were pen pals. As cousins, they wrote and did only good things for each other but
gossip spreads really quickly when you're brought up by your kingdom's taxes. Government officials heard Elizabeth did not indeed love her cousin
but in reality, hated her. Elizabeth was outraged at Mary and said that "as long as I live there should be no other queen but I." On the other end
Queen Mary was said to say the same but for their own advantage talked to each other as they were "good sisters" and would have a "good inclination
to peace and friendship."
Elizabeth was smart enough to use tactics that kept Mary and her tremendous need to be queen away from her throne. Therefore they started competing
with each other in their "declarations of love." It

Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose Essay
Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose The play "Twelve Angry Men", By Reginald Rose, is a play about 12 jurors that in an uncomfortable room
have to discuss a life and death case about a boy that is accused or killing his father. the jurors do not really know eachother to talk to and wish they
were anywhere but in that jury room. Every juror has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. In my opinion there were 3 main
jurors in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is important because he is smart, brave, and fair. Juror 3 was important because he was the
antagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant. Juror 9 was important because he wasn't afraid of confronting other jurors.
Juror 8 was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, Juror 8 was also fair. He said "It's not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die with out talking about it first" when he
was the only one that voted not guilty in the first vote. He also listened to everyone's opinions and never insulted anyone. Juror 3 was also a very
important juror in the jury room. Juror 3 was the antagonist. He was the main enemy of Juror 8 and he was trying to keep people from believing
that the boy was not guilty. Juror 3 was also mean. He wanted everyone to think the way he did, and lost his temper whenever they didn't. In addition,
Juror 3 was also intolerant. He didn't want to listen to anybody's opinions and in the discussion that he had with Juror 8 on page 147 in the book, it
seemed that he personally wanted the kid to die.
Another very important juror in the jury room was Juror 9. Juror 9 was a fair man. He voted not guilty because he had a reasonable doubt in his
mind and he listened to everyone's opinions, Juror 9 was also smart. He made a reasonable doubt by saying that the old man might of lied to get
attention because he noticed that he was a quiet, frightened, insignificant man who has probably never been nothing all his life. He also remembered
that the woman in the train had bifocals, and that she never took them off. that made a reasonable doubt on everyone's mind because it would of been
very hard for the woman in the

Biography Of Queen Elizabeth I
Queen Elizabeth I
Queen Elizabeth the first was a very controversial figure during her time. During her childhood, her mother was wrongly accused and killed. Her
father then married many more and also they disappeared. Through all of this she still became Queen. When she took over her country was in ruins
and on the verge of war. The two other major powers were on either side of England and could easily defeat the country with ease. She managed to get
through this though with many forms of deception and manipulation. Her lifestyle was lavish but the intentions were not all so great. She had many
hardships during her reign and this was how she traversed through it. During this time there were also many rumors and speculations of her. She is ...
She was born a bastard child on September 7, 1533 she was born this way because the Pope never granted King Henry VII to be divorced from his
previous wife. Due to this she was always treated as such a person she was never liked by the country in her younger years. She was always treated
like an outcast and so to help she studied under the guidance of Henry's sixth wife Katherine Parr. With this she did get a good education as many
women of her time did not. She had several private tutors because she was the daughter of a King, she studied many languages. Of the various
languages she learned Spanish and French as well as her native language of English. She also learned many more languages. These are two very
important languages for her of this time, she had not know this yet, but in her later years this would become quite evident. During her studies, she
also learned theology, astronomy, and physics in which she excelled in. This is partially to why she was such a great leader and is adored. When
she was around the age of two her mother was accused of adultery by King Henry and she was executed by guillotine.Growing up she also had
siblings from different mothers. One of his wives had a boy named Edward. After her father died Edward took the throne at this time he was very
sickly and died not too soon afterward. Next in line was her sister Mary. During this time she became known as Bloody Mary she received this title
because she was known for persecution of many protestants. Queen Mary ended what her father had started which is known as the protestant
reformation. She ended this and started to rebuild the Roman Catholic beliefs. This caused many people to flee the country and started to make the
country weak and vulnerable. During this entire time Elizabeth never undertook the beliefs and practices of the catholics. There was a rebellion led by
Thomas Wyatt and mary insisted that Elizabeth was a

Stereotypes Of Queen Elizabeth 1
Queen Elizabeth I ruled England during a turbulent time in its history. She was beset on all sides by those who wished to take her throne for
themselves, whether it be through marriage or outright treason. With these threats, as well as the unstable political atmosphere across much of
Europe, Elizabeth I could not afford for others to see her as weak. Although she distances herself from the stereotypes of women at the time, and even
paints herself as a masculine figure to give herself an aura of strength that would deter potential usurpers, Elizabeth I's language indicates that she is
not ashamed of her femininity. The Renaissance was a point in history where it was hard for women to hold political power. It was a commonly held
belief that women were inherently inferior monarchs; this was likely reinforced by a significant number of female rulers failing to successfully rule
their nations (Taylor–Smither 48). Despite educational opportunities for noble woman being at an all–time high, women who held positions of power
had to fight tooth and nail to retain them (King 78). It was extremely difficult for a woman to inherit the right to rule, as it required every legitimate
male heir to die (King 82). During this period, society saw powerful women as a threat to the status quo. Such women were vilified because they "did
what men did, and triumphantly," (King 78). Nowhere is this as true as with Elizabeth I. She was a queen that ruled England and ruled it well. Under
her reign,

The Case Of Mexican Sues Essay
Introduction (1) The plaintiff, The President of Mexico sues to receive compensation of $350,000,000 for injuries as a result of a fall, which
occurred Thursday, September 15, 2016 on one of the lookout towers atop the SISR Wall in Lloydminster built by The defendant, Great Wall
Construction Specialists Ltd. (also known as "GWCS") (2) The plaintiff alleges that Great Wall Construction Specialists Ltd. was negligent in their
maintenance of the lookout towers where he fell through the floorboards and thus, is liable to him for the injuries he sustained as a result of his
accident. Facts (3) The defendant had invited the plaintiff to tour the portion of the SISR Wall that had been completed through the border city of
Lloydminster, Alberta/Saskatchewan in hopes the plaintiff would consider their company to build Mexico's own great wall along the Northern
border between Mexico and the United states of America. (4) The Province of Alberta has not yet paid for the SISR Wall and accordingly, GWCS
retains ownership of the wall and complete control over the SISR Wall (5) The Plaintiff stood in one of the lookout towers atop the SISR Wall in
Lloydminster when several of the wooden floorboards collapsed. The Plaintiff was standing a few feet on the Saskatchewan side of the border and the
action is being commenced in Saskatchewan. (6) At the time of the accident, the Plaintiff was not acting unusual or jumping up and down. (7) The
Defendant does not know exactly why the wooden

Groupthink In 12 Angry Men
Very early into the movie the jurors are involved in group dynamics, which we defined in class as the processes involved when a collection of
people interact with one another. The idea of 'Groupthink" first comes into play when the men are asked to cast their vote based on the trial they just
sat in on. A couple of the men immediately raise their hands for guilty while the other, less "certain" members wait a moment till after seeing the
majority of the group raise their hand for them do the same. As we studied in class, this interaction between group members happens when members
are more worried about fitting in, or being a part of the "status quo" so to speak then actually offering their true opinion. Henry Fonda the man who
played juror

The 8th Juror In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose
What happens when someone testifies against someone with damning evidence, but the evidence might not be so solid? What are you supposed to
do if you are on the Jury, and you have a reasonable doubt? Do you just vote guilty and hope to be done? Do you go ever every piece of detail and
figure out what is wrong with the evidence? These are questions that Juror number 8 from the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose has when he
is put on a jury.
In the play Twelve Angry Men, Juror number 8's role is to try and decide whether a 16 year old teenager is guilty or not of killing his father. He is
especially important to the play because he votes not guilty because he had a reasonable doubt, and that meant that he would have to use tiny clues
and facts to see if the boy was in fact guilty.
In the play, his intelligence, and knowledge of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Let's take the two pieces of testimony and try to put them together. First, the old man in the apartment downstairs. He says he heard the by say,
"I'm going to kill you" and a second later he heard the body hit the floor. One second later. Right?...Second, the woman in the apartment across the
street. She claimed that she looked out of her window and saw the killing through the last two cars of a passing elevated train. Right? The last two
cars...Now, we agreed that an el train takes about ten seconds to pass a given point. Since the woman saw the stabbing through the last two cars,
we can assume the body fell to the floor just as the train passed by. THerefore, the el train had been roaring by the old man's window for a full ten
seconds before the body fell. The old man, according to his own testimony, hearing "I'm going to kill you" and the body falling a split second later,
would have had to hear the boy make this as the el train rolled past his house. It's not logical that he could have heard it" (Rose 34–35). This goes to
show that the knowledge beforehand influenced on how he voted, and the evidence he

Essay about The Influence of the Common Scotish Life on...
Robert Burns was an influential Scottish writer who connected with the people of Scotland. The four main things that influenced his poetry and songs
were: his family which includes school, his farming work, the church as an institution and the common Scottish person's life. This paper will show how
these four things influenced his life and writing. For this writer, personally the influences on Robert Burns are interesting since he is my several times
great–grandfather. Both my maternal grandfather`s family and my maternal grandmother`s family are from Ayrshire,Scotland, in the lowlands–the place
where Burns was born and grew up. Robert Burns (often called Robbie or Rabbie in Scotland) was "born on January 25, 1759 in Alloway,... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Robert Burns' mother read him transcripts from the Bible; she was able to read however she was unable to write. Robert would write to her. Burns'
mother Agnes was credited for giving an influence on Burns` love for song, "these influences resulted in him writing over three hundred songs."
(Hecht, Page 225) His Father encouraging him to read and educate himself affected him too and his joy of reading was formed early, as Robert
himself says;
"The two first books I ever read in private, and which gave me more pleasure than any two books I ever read again, were The Life of Hannibal and
The History of Sir William Wallace. Hannibal gave my young ideas such a turn that I used to strut in raptures up and down after the recruiting drum
and bagpipe, and wish myself tall enough that I might be a soldier; while the story of Wallace poured a Scottish prejudice into my veins which will
boil along there till the flood–gates of life shut in eternal rest." (The Influences of Robert Burns)
This was the starting point of his true inspiration, these books had such an impact on him that he felt it would be bad if read something else. During
his growth as a young man Robert Burns lived and worked on a Farm, he was brought up in a daily demanding routine. Every

Ant-Man Script Analysis
Edgar Wright and Joe Cornish had originally written a treatment of Ant–Man for Artisan Entertainment, but since Artisan was searching for a
family–oriented film, they decided to not go with the script. Back in April of 2006, Marvel Studios asked Wright if he was interested in writing a
script for any Marvel titles, and this is when Wright offered up the Ant–Man script. Edgar Wright and Joe Cornish were signed to co–write together
while Wright also signed to co–produce with Nira Park (Wiki). In 2007 Wright reported that the film was at a standstill while the script was being
revised and that casting had still not started. March of 2008, Empire magazine reports that Wright stated a second draft of the script is being created
and that the film will portray Hank Pym as the original 1960's character and Scott Lang as his 1980's/1990's successor. He also stated that the film puts
a new twist on an origins story, and that for part of his writing he studied nanotechnology. At the Kapow! Comic–con in April 2011 Cornish states that
they have submitted a second draft to Marvel and at the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At the same time Evangeline Lilly and Corey Stoll appeared on a Marvel panel at the comic–con and confirmed their rolls. Corey Stoll also revealed
he'd be playing Darren Cross as Yellowjacket, which was confusing for some fans because Yellowjacket was an alias that Hank Pym had used in the
comics (Riesman). Also, when it was revealed that Hank Pym would be greatly motivated by the death of his wife, The Wasp, a large number of
people were upset and it caused a commotion online that the movie is portraying a very important character in the comics as just a minor female
character who lost her life to make the male/main character sad. Filming finally began in August of 2014 and the first trailer was released January 6,

Compare And Contrast Mary Queen Of Scots
In the stories of "Mary Queen of Scots" and "Elizabeth I", it is known that Mary and Elizabeth I are two different people, but also the similar in some
ways. Both Elizabeth and Mary lived within the same time period and were even related, although their lives ended up completely different. Elizabeth
was a well–respected queen with an interesting personal life. Mary on the other hand was convicted of aiding a homicide and had many problems in
her personal life. Therefore, Elizabeth and Mary both had some similarities and differences between their early lives and their personal lives.
Elizabeth's and Mary's life were very different from each other when it comes to their early and personal lives. When we are reading, according to the
book and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When going into more detail about the failed attempts at marriage between both Mary and Elizabeth it is basically repeating the same thing. Which
would be that Elizabeth tried but eventually said that she did not want to forsake her virginity to anyone so she had declined any request for her
hand and stated that she was married to her country. Mary though did not want to be a virgin she did have three marriages that all failed and even
died because someone wasn't happy or someone cheated on someone. According to both sources by Harmon and Warnicke, both Mary and Elizabeth
had some bad encounters with some trouble when they were younger. For Elizabeth it was when Elizabeth found out how Mary had come to get her
way into the throne, and Elizabeth found out that Mary was working with people that was attempting to either assassinate or kidnap Elizabeth.
Elizabeth kept Mary alive for many years moving her around from prison to prison, and eventually she found out that Mary was plotting once again
against Elizabeth so she ordered that Mary, be executed even though she really didn't want to. Mary too had run into some trouble multiple times in her
younger days such as she had multiple threats of abductions against her life. According to Warnicke, "noblemen viewed women rulers as naturally
subordinate to them and susceptible, like minors, to their authority if

A Comparison Of Mary Stuart, Queen Of Scots, And Elizabeth I
Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, and Elizabeth I, Queen of England are well known for their tremulous relationship, with both queens eager to keep or
obtain the English throne. Throughout her time as the Queen of France and even after, Mary was given the chance to abdicate her claim on the
throne, yet she refused. This decision, as well as the evidence gathered in her trial later in life, would be her downfall.
Margaret Tudor, sister to Henry VIII, married James IV, and gave birth to James V,Mary's father. In Margaret's second marriage, she married the Earl
of Angus. Her grandson through that marriage would later become Mary's second husband and father to James VI and I, who would sit upon both the
Scottish and English thrones. Her first husband, King Francis II, died only a year after their marriage and she returned to Scotland a widow, without an
heir to succeed him. Henry VIII, after nullifying his marriage to his first wife Catherine of Aragon, would marry Anne Boleyn. Their daughter,
Elizabeth I, would become Queen of England following her brother and sister. Protestant like her mother, many believed that a Catholic should once
again sit upon the throne, and Mary, Queen of Scots, was a solid ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, in the eyes of many Catholics, Mary Stuart, was considered the rightful heir to the throne of England, and her father–in–law, King Henry II of
France, even declared his eldest son and daughter–in–law to be the legitimate King Consort and Queen of England. Mary also refused to recognize
Elizabeth's claim to the English throne, which remained a controversial sticking point between Mary and Elizabeth (Fraser

Importance Of Tourism In England
Many people would say that England isn't a wonderful place to go travel just because there is so much security that goes on there, then others will
say it's a fabulous place to travel just because they lived there and there are many things to do in England. On that note, who is really right about
it? There are many things that are geologic about England, but the main geologic features about England are their sedimentary rocks. This feature
is very popular in England just because there is so many in different regions and you can witness them as quick as possible, many people find the
rocks as art to themselves and that's a hobby to them to figure out everything about the rocks and how long it was there for. There are always other
geological features in England like Cheddar Gorge, Jurassic Coast, Whin Sill, London Basin, and even Lizard Complex, a lot of humans could take
trips to those places if they can and will take pictures if they want and post them on social media. Humans will not make concerns for the future just
because they really won't have a way to make a big difference with it. The climate in England is very well balanced just because they have warm
summers and even cool winters, the climate is a mild temperature not much lower than 0 C in the winter and not much higher than 32 C in the summer.
The warmest month in England will definitely be July and August, but the coolest month will have to be both January and February. There are many
months you can go and

Mr Davis 12 Angry Men
Looking at the Bigger Picture
"What you can achieve in life has a lot to do with your self–image" (Roth 191). Mr. Davis from 12 Angry Men showed just how much he could
achieve during the jury discussion with his own self–image. He had the courage to stand up for his beliefs and continuously focused on persuading the
other jurors to see between the lines and take a look at the bigger picture. In the 1957 MGM film entitled 12Angry Men Mr. Davis was patient, polite,
and persistent to put in the effort to find out the facts and truths within the case.
Patience is not the ability to wait, but the ability to keep a good attitude while waiting. During the discussion between the jurors, Mr. Davis stayed
calm rather than yell or argue to make his point. "Belonging to groups gives us an important way to express our humanity" (Roth 149). Mr. Davis
expressed his humanity by listening to what the others had to say and even engaged in conversation with them showing his interest in what they said.
He did not interrupt anyone nor did he try to put anyone down for what they would say. Mr. Davis stated "I just want to talk", meaning he wanted to
take the time to analyze all the facts and details about the case; keeping in mind the possibility of the defendant being innocent. He wanted to help the
others see things from a different point of view and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mr. Davis shown some light on the prejudices of the jury, but did so in a polite manner. "... prejudice always obscures the truth" (12 Angry Men). The
prejudice of some of the jurors consumed them and kept them from analyzing all of the facts of the case. Mr. Davis did his best to show his
politeness of the other jurors as well as the defendant. His self–confidence motivated the others to analyze the facts. He also believed that no man was
better than the other. All throughout the discussion, he proved how polite he was just by his communication skills

Juror Guilty Quotes
Juror 1: Juror 1 had taken the charge of jury. The votes were counted by him. Whatever he was saying which was to be done. He was maintaining
the order. But when juror 8 explained about how the stabbing took place if killer is smaller in height. He changes his vote from 'Guilty' to 'Not
Guilty'. He is the person in charge & he is changing his vote may lead other to change their votes. This can be related to 'Appeal to Authority'. Juror 2:
"I just think he's guilty. I thought it was obvious. I mean nobody proved otherwise."– these words of juror 2 says that he has difficulty maintain his own
opinion. When juror 8 said, "The old man heard the boy say, "I'm going to kill you," and one second later he heard a body fall. One second. That's the...
In the reply, he said "The boy yelled that's enough for him". This argument doesn't make sense and shows his prejudice. When juror 8
said,"supposing he really did hear it? This phrase: how many times has each of you used it? Probably hundreds. "If you do that once more junior,
I'm going to murder you." "Come on, Rocky, kill him!" We say it every day. This doesn't mean that we're going to kill someone ". In the reply juror
3 said," The phrase was "I'm going to kill you," and the kid screamed it out at the top of his lungs. Don't try and tell me he didn't mean it." But when
juror 8 made him angry then he screamed the words "I'm gonna kill you"– which is fallacy or inconsistency in the sentences said by

Lambert 's Cafe Inc.
Lambert's CafГ© Inc. ("Lambert's CafГ©") will be held liable and found negligent for damages sustained by Troy Tucker ("Ms. Tucker") as a
result of food thrown at plaintiff while visiting the establishment. In this case, it was substantiated that the plaintiff was injured by the roll thrown
by Ms. Garrett, an employee of Lambert's CafГ© who was, at the time of injury, working on behalf of the restaurant. The issues to look to then are:
Did Lambert's CafГ© owe Ms. Tucker a duty of reasonable care? If Lambert's CafГ© did owe plaintiff a duty of reasonable care, was it breached by the
throwing of the roll that resulted in permanent injuries sustained by Ms. Tucker? Black's Law Dictionary defines "standard of care" as the "degree of
care a prudent ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Lambert's CafГ© is first and foremost a restaurant. In Coomer, the Court examined a case where a patron at a baseball game sustained
injury after being hit in the eye with a hotdog thrown into the audience by a baseball team's mascot (Id. at 188). The Court asserted, based on
findings in Ross v. Clouser, 637 S.W.2d 11, 14 (Mo. Banc 1982) that "if a person voluntarily consents to accept the danger of a known and
appreciated risk, that person may not sure another for failing to protect him from it" (Id. at 189). They then asserted that if that is the case, the
plaintiff would not be owed any duty of care by defendant (Id. at 192). However, they found that having a hotdog thrown at one's person during a
baseball event does not constitute an "inherent risk," since it is not a common practice during the performance of an average baseball game (Id. at
202). The Court concluded that the team "...[owed] the fans a duty to use reasonable care in conducting the Hotdog Launch and can be held liable for
damages..."(Id. at 203).
Similarly, in a normal restaurant environment, it is reasonable to assume that a normal invitee would not assume an "inherent risk" of having food
thrown at them during his or her attendance for a meal. Like in Coomer, the risk of injury sustained as a result of the roll–throwing is born by the
establishment despite the fact that eradication of this practice would not impact the operation of the

Juror 8 Reflection

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tammy Kordeliski

More from Tammy Kordeliski (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Juror 8 Reflection