SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 27
‫الرحيم‬ ‫الرحمن‬ ‫ال‬ ‫بسم‬
A Study on Genetic Variability, Interrelationships among some
Agronomic Traits and Path Coefficient Analysis in Pearl Millet
‫اللؤلؤي‬ ‫الدخن‬ ‫في‬ ‫المسار‬ ‫معامل‬ ‫وتحليل‬ ‫الحقلية‬ ‫الصفات‬ ‫بعض‬ ‫ارتباط‬ ،‫الوراثي‬ ‫التباين‬ ‫دراسة‬
By
Omar Abdalla Bakhit Hassan
M.Sc. presentation
Supervisor
Dr. El hag Hassan Abuelgasim
23 February 2010
INTRODUCTION
 Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.)R.Br) or "Dukhun", is a cereal crop
belonging to section Panacea of the family Poaceae.
 Pearl millet is a robust, diploid species (2n=14), cross-pollinated grass with
immense genetic diversity.
 The center of origin for pearl millet stretching from Western Sudan to
Senegal.
 It's planted across a wide range of It's environments around the
world.
 grown as a subsistence grain and forage crop for livestock. Also its
stalk can be used as building material or as fuel.
 Pearl millet comes as the sixth among cereal crops in the world in
terms of production, coming after wheat, rice, maize, barley and
sorghum.
PEARL MILLET WORLD’S PRODUCTION AND
PRODUCTIVITY:
 The world total grown area, in 2006 was 36.297 million hectares.
 produced 32.074 million metrics tones.
 The world average grain yield was ranged from and 883.6 kg/ha for
the year 2006.
PEARL MILLET IN SUDAN:
 Is a preferred food crop for the majority of the inhabitants of
Western Sudan.
 In terms of both area and production it ranks second after sorghum.
 The crop is almost exclusively raised under rain-fed conditions with
97% of the total area in the country being raised under traditional
farming conditions.
 About 95% of the crop area is found in Western Sudan (Kordofan
and Darfur states) mainly in the extensive sandy soil zone.
 The annual average rainfall in the millet growing areas varies from
200 mm to 750 mm, falling during a short rainy season of 2 to 4
months.
PEARL MILLET IN SUDAN (Cont):
 The annual average rainfall in the millet growing areas varies from
200 mm to 750 mm, falling during a short rainy season of 2 to 4
months.
 The crop was grown on 2.256 million hectares producing 0.792
million metric tones in 2006 (FAO, 2007).
 The average yield of grain per hectare in Sudan was 351 Kg/ha, in
2006.
CONSTRAINTS OF PRODUCTION:
 The low and unreliable rainfall comes first since 99% of the area
cultivated depends on rainfall.
 The poor genetic stocks cultivated by farmers
 Pests and diseases cause serious damage to the crop.
 The poor cultural practices followed by farmers.
 Lack of agricultural services and inputs.
 Lack of financing and extension services.
OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY:
 To obtain information on genetic variability of agronomic traits in
local and exotic pearl millet genotypes.
 To study the genotypic and phenotypic interrelationships between
the different pairs of various agronomic traits.
 To study the path coefficient analysis of some important
agronomic traits and their direct and indirect effects on grain yield.
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY:
[1] Materials:
 Sites: El shegaila, Beinu and El jekka in rain fed areas (North
Kordofan state), and Shambat was planted under irrigation area in
(Khartoum state).
 Genotypes: The 18 local and exotic genotypes were tested.
 Design: Randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four
replications was used.
 The experimental plot: consisted of 4 rows of 5 meter length, with a
spacing of 75 cm between rows and 50 cm between plant holes. Six
to eight seeds were sown in each hole.
 Recommended agronomic practices were used.
Table 1: The pearl millet genotypes used in the study of genetic
variability and interrelationships among different traits
No Genotype Origin Note source
1 Ashana ICRISAT Released ARC-Sudan
2 Ugandi Uganda Released ARC-Sudan
3 Dembe (Um shegaira) Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
4 Aish burno West Africa Collection ARC-Sudan
5 Um gerfa Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
6 GB 87-35 ICRISAT promising ARC-Sudan
7 Bauda Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan
8 Demde yellow Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
9 Dahabaya ARC promising ARC-Sudan
10 Local Kordofani Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
11 Sudan II ICRISAT promising ARC-Sudan
12 HSD 2254 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan
13 HSD 2260 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan
14 HSD 2261 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan
15 HSD 2279 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan
16 HSD 2348 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
17 HSD 2380 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
18 HSD 2416 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
[2] Data collection:
 All measurements were taken from the two central rows in each plot.
 The 17 agronomic traits were measured which includes :
 plant population/ hectare.
 Days to 50% to flowering.
 days to 95% maturity.
 plant height (cm).
 stem diameter (cm).
 productive tillers/ plant.
 panicle length (cm).
 panicle width (cm).
[2] Data collection (Cont):
 number of panicles/ plot.
 dry panicles/ plot.
 number of seeds/ panicle.
 1000 seed weight (g).
 grain yield/ plant (g).
 grain yield/ hectare (kg).
 biological yield/ hectare (kg).
 threshing percentage.
 harvest index.
[3] Statistical analysis :
 Single site and combined analysis – MSTAT-C software.
 Mean separation (LSD 0.05).
 Phenotypic, genotypic and variation.
 Heritability (Hanson et al. 1956).
 Phenotypic coefficients of variation (Burton 1952).
 Genotypic coefficients of variation (Burton 1952).
 Genetic advance and percentage genetic advance (Johnson et al.
1955).
 Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients (Miller et al. ,
1958) .
 Path coefficients analysis (Dewey and Lu ,1959) .
RESULTS
 Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences among
locations for all traits.
 Highly significant differences among genotypes were observed for
most of the traits studied.
 Significant differences for genotypes x locations interactions were
detected for most of the traits.
Table 2: Overall means average for the different characters in 18 pearl millet
genotypes at four sites in 2005/06 season.
SiteCharacter
El shegaila Beinu El jekka Shambat
Grand
mean
Plant population/ha 27842 36408 16008 36209 29130
50% days to flowering 69.98 59.10 75.06 66.07 68.01
95% days to maturity 99.48 89.29 105.07 96.61 97.79
Plant height (cm) 164.75 151.208 142.63 180.83 159.84
Stem diameter (cm) 1.039 0.878 0.992 1.18 1.03
Productive tillers/plant 1.39 1.625 1.751 3.67 2.18
Panicle length (cm) 23.19 24.590 24.849 22.16 24.26
Panicle width (cm) 2.56 2.400 2.403 2.30 2.42
No of panicles/ plot 50.58 66.111 30.910 168.04 79.00
Dry panicles wt. (kg)/plot 1.04 1.208 0.971 3.86 1.801
No of seeds/panicle 1530 1234 1312 1450 1381
1000 seeds weight (g) 8.69 7.07 7.77 8.09 7.93
Grain yield (g)/plant 20.40 14.454 30.09 54.89 30.12
Grain yield (kg)/ha 541.198 529.644 450.554 1546.280 766.919
Biological yield (kg)/ha 3303.174 4223.833 1942.626 8478.773 4486.978
Threshing % 54.76 48.02 55.09 46.12 51.02
Harvest index % 16.21 12.790 23.60 18.32 17.77
Table 3: Means for different characters of 18 pearl millet genotypes evaluated at
four sites in 2005/06 season.
Genotype Plant
Population
/ha
Days to
50%
flowering
Days to
95%
maturity
Plant
Height
(cm)
Stem
Diameter
(cm)
Productive
Tillers/plant
Ashana 26934 59.19 86.44 152.92 1.04 2.30
Ugandi 26827 58.25 85.25 156.77 1.17 2.57
Dembe (Um shegaira) 29663 77.31 107.25 163.25 1.12 2.01
Aish burno 28996 71.06 101.50 166.76 0.99 1.98
Um gerfa 27717 73.13 104.12 146.84 0.96 1.88
GB 87-35 28880 59.44 86.81 150.93 1.00 2.17
Bauda 28676 62.50 92.38 149.02 0.91 2.33
Demde yellow 30880 63.25 93.19 155.12 1.08 2.63
Dahabaya 29876 67.19 98.44 163.61 1.01 2.16
Local Kordofani 31049 72.75 103.63 160.37 0.99 2.35
Sudan II 27823 58.81 86.38 171.55 1.00 2.26
HSD 2254 30933 74.00 105.06 180.84 1.00 2.17
HSD 2260 27939 72.44 102.56 173.66 1.11 2.20
HSD 2261 29625 71.44 102.06 167.63 1.07 1.97
HSD 2279 28160 68.94 99.38 148.88 0.96 2.24
HSD 2348 31885 69.06 99.31 153.69 1.03 2.00
HSD 2380 28046 70.81 101.00 155.85 1.03 2.08
HSD 2416 30436 75.00 105.44 159.67 1.03 2.03
Mean 29130 68.01 97.79 159.84 1.03 2.18
SE ± 406** 0.636** 0.665** 1.84** 0.015** 0.055**
C.V% 15.68 9.81 7.84 10.63 11.28 19.71
Table 3: Continued ….
Genotype Panicle
Length
(cm)
Panicle
Width
(cm)
No of
Panicle
/plot
Dry panicle
Weight
(kg)/plot
No of seeds
/panicle
1000-seed
Wt.(g)
Ashana 24.20 2.62 75.50 1.567 1299 8.25
Ugandi 25.41 2.44 87.44 1.563 1213 8.59
Dembe (Um shegaira) 23.80 2.59 73.19 1.830 1498 7.16
Aish burno 24.07 2.02 70.69 1.325 996 7.84
Um gerfa 24.60 2.43 63.44 1.656 1430 7.93
GB 87-35 23.68 2.41 78.44 1.580 1265 8.44
Bauda 25.28 2.32 85.47 1.762 1195 7.71
Demde yellow 24.33 2.53 97.25 2.266 1519 8.51
Dahabaya 25.86 2.41 83.94 2.325 1493 8.07
Local Kordofani 23.40 2.49 90.81 1.842 1507 7.91
Sudan II 30.66 2.13 77.63 1.928 1603 7.80
HSD 2254 23.24 1.91 81.56 1.877 1183 8.17
HSD 2260 23.87 2.44 80.67 1.689 1560 7.55
HSD 2261 23.43 2.44 75.88 1.769 1201 8.32
HSD 2279 21.08 2.54 78.25 2.148 1499 7.25
HSD 2348 23.37 2.44 78.75 1.667 1343 7.74
HSD 2380 23.41 2.68 69.06 1.631 1478 7.97
HSD 2416 23.05 2.66 74.56 1.992 1579 7.57
Mean 24.26 2.42 79.00 1.801 1381 7.93
SE ± 0.265** 0.030** 1.519** 0.039** 26** 0.104**
C.V% 9.98 11.87 20.57 17.55 15.80 11.17
LSD (0.05) 1.68 0.19 11.76 0.22 151.30 0.61
Table 3: Continued ….
Genotype Grain
Yield (g)/
plant
Grain
Yield(kg)/ha
Biological
Yield(kg)/ha
Threshing
%
Harvest
Index %
Ashana 34.75 835.347 3528.008 57.86 22.05
Ugandi 33.48 782.027 35902.212 58.80 20.44
Dembe (Um shegaira) 29.92 746.480 4140.748 51.04 17.15
Aish burno 23.71 568.747 3847.928 52.34 15.84
Um gerfa 25.74 617.624 3385.82 47.10 16.96
GB 87-35 31.96 768.697 3807.938 58.30 19.58
Bauda 33.40 764.254 3528.008 54.67 19.05
Demde yellow 34.71 958.872 4179.401 53.58 18.44
Dahabaya 36.45 710.045 4345.58 49.50 18.45
Local Kordofani 26.24 694.938 4381.128 45.84 15.40
Sudan II 39.35 905.552 3910.135 55.78 24.30
HSD 2254 25.98 686.051 4336.695 41.98 15.05
HSD 2260 26.84 662.057 4185.620 44.46 15.69
HSD 2261 28.69 692.272 4007.888 48.33 15.53
HSD 2279 28.83 729.596 4221.168 45.83 17.78
HSD 2348 23.01 640.729 4025.660 51.40 15.10
HSD 2380 25.83 614.958 4104.64 48.52 14.89
HSD 2416 32.97 854.009 4274.488 53.37 18.15
Mean 30.12 735.816 4012.330 51.04 17.77
SE ± 1.07** 14.667** 75.333* 0.860** 0.477**
C.V% 23.65 21.47 20.05 12.12 21.81
LSD (0.05) 4.93 3.27 18.79 4.24 2.53
Table 4: Means for grain yield (kg)/ha of 18 pearl millet
genotypes evaluated in 2005/06 season.
site
Genotype El shegaila Beinu El jekka Shambat Grand mean
Ashana 529.645 833.125 461.180 1762.226 835.347
Ugandi 457.663 840.679 412.340 1557.833 782.027
Dembe (Um shegaira) 507.429 434.558 520.759 1625.370 746.480
Aish burno 494.099 399.900 380.014 1051.293 568.747
Um gerfa 531.423 419.451 359.910 1239.69 617.624
GB 87-35 532.310 780.248 506.667 1162.376 768.697
Bauda 510.982 432.781 391.012 1816.435 764.254
Demde yellow 481.656 444.332 484.322 2090.144 958.872
Dahabaya 774.916 439.890 321.696 2240.329 710.045
Local Kordofani 668.276 491.433 321.692 1412.98 694.938
Sudan II 572.300 684.272 526.978 1885.751 905.552
HSD 2254 455.886 545.640 446.998 1356.106 686.051
HSD 2260 622.067 566.081 402.566 1151.712 662.057
HSD 2261 505.650 437.225 427.449 1479.63 692.272
HSD 2279 614.069 503.874 399.900 1498.292 729.596
HSD 2348 501.208 423.004 299.481 1359.660 640.729
HSD 2380 486.988 333.250 418.562 1331.223 614.958
HSD 2416 558.083 532.310 490.544 1812.880 854.009
Mean 541.198 529.644 431.002 1546.280 735.816
SE ± 30.666 26.400 31.33 53.333 14.667
C.V% 28.91 27.65 38.31 19.47 21.47
LSD (0.05) 4.12 3.54 3.87 7.18 3.27
Table 5: Estimate of phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV %), Genotypic
coefficient of variation (GCV %), heritability (h²), expected genetic advance
from section (GA) and genetic advance as percentage of mean (GA %) for
agronomic traits in 18 pearl millet genotypes tested at four sites in 2005/06
season.
CHARACTER (PCV %) (GCV %) (h²) (GA) (GA %)
Plant population/ha 17.21 6.62 0.147 1.71 5.24
50% days to flowering 19.32 16.64 0.742 20.03 29.53
95% days to maturity 15.31 13.15 0.738 22.89 23.26
Plant height (cm) 14.97 10.53 0.495 24.40 15.26
Stem diameter (cm) 15.19 10.17 0.448 0.145 14.02
Productive tillers/ plant 25.09 15.53 0.383 0.45 19.79
Panicle length (cm) 17.36 14.21 0.67 5.81 23.95
Panicle width (cm) 20.47 16.68 0.66 0.68 27.99
No of panicles/ plot 28.44 19.64 0.48 23.04 27.93
Dry panicles wt. (kg)/plot 33.52 28.56 0.73 0.89 50.13
No of seeds/panicle 28.49 23.71 0.69 561.73 40.65
1000 seeds weight (g) 14.33 8.97 0.39 0.92 11.57
Grain yield (g)/plant 35.03 25.83 0.54 11.8 39.24
Grain yield kg/ha 38.07 31.44 0.68 0.39 53.47
Biological yield kg ha 23.71 12.59 0.28 0.624 13.78
Threshing % 24.57 21.33 0.75 19.12 38.13
Harvest index % 37.89 30.98 0.67 8.73 52.20
Table 6: Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients
between different pairs of traits in 18 pearl millet genotypes
evaluated at four sites in 2005/06 season.
TRAIT DTF DTM PLH SD NPTP PNL PNW NP DPWT NSP TGWT GYP GYH BYH THP HI
DTF 1.006** 0.366 -0.005 -0.69** -0.59** 0.061 -0.426 0.137 0.173 -0.590** -0.573* -0.573* 0.723** -0.89** 0.946**
DTM 0.972** 0.336 -0.078 -0.65** -0.60** 0.045 -0.374 0.173 0.176 -0.527* -0.570* -0.571* 0.74** -0.93** -0.95**
PLH 0.193 0.186 0.258 -0.097 0.233 -0.72** 0.036 0.053 -0.064 -0.084 -0.159 -0.107 0.782** -0.305 -0.199
SD 0.018 -0.059 0.313 0.433 -0.085 0.367 0.416 -0.147 0.116 0.316 0.102 0.177 0.358 0.189 -0.038
NPTP -0.437 0.413 0.060 0.217 0.179 0.065 0.941** 0.188 0.084 0.599** 0.468* 0.614** -0.038 0.399 0.532*
PNL 0.421 -0.429 0.197 0.028 0.093 -0.403 0.113 0.119 0.204 0.075 0.593** 0.522* -0.344 0.515* 0.721**
PNW 0.003 0.006 0.296 0.320 0.103 0.207 -0.014 0. 112 0.564* -0.220 0.226 0.187 -0.087 0.037 -0.047
NP 0.324 0.285 0.157 0.243 0.839** 0.121 0.053 0.308 0.076 0.459 0.392 0.517* 0.133 0.161 0.291
DPWT 0.061 0.097 0.154 0.050 0.176 0.106 0.161 0.295 0.663** -0.318 0.675** 0.574* 0.437 -0.355 -0.025
NSP 0.079 0.072 0.020 0.086 0.027 0.188 0.455 0.036 0.520* -0.445 0.457 0.383 0.512* -0.234 -0.017
TGWT 0.317 0.303 0.098 0.221 0.324 0.137 0.000 0.286 -0.019 0.233 0.036 0.245 -0.507 0.429 0.236
GYP 0.381 0.382 0.017 0.021 0.321 0.352 0.202 0.210 0.596** 0.358 0.093 0.978** -0.197 0.455 0.720**
GYH -0.439 0.425 0.006 0.133 0.375 0.358 0.193 0.407 0.642** 0.368 0.251 0.832** -0.231 0.522* 0.719**
BYH 0.265 0.297 0.489* 0.229 0.139 0.106 0.113 0.255 0.396 0.309 0.023 0.042 0.104 -0.83** -0.68**
THP 0.655** -0.69** -0.157 0.127 0.192 0.385 0.016 0.081 0.291 0.204 0.252 0.363 0.423 0.346 0.893**
HI 0.665** 0.661** 0.117 0.088 0.289 0.491* 0.027 0.166 0.064 0.035 0.158 0.620** 0.632** 0.286 0.736**
The genotypic correlations are the upper triangle and phenotypic correlations in the lower one. *, ** and ns are the level of significance at 5%, 1% and non-significant,
respectively. D.f = n-2=16, r 5%= 0.468, r 1% = 0.590
Legend:
DTF Days to flowering PNL Panicle length (cm) TSWT 1000 grains weight (g) HI Harvest index
DTM Days to maturity PNW Panicle width (cm) GYP Grain yield per plant (g) THP Threshing%
PLH Plant height (cm) NP Number of panicle/ plot GYH Grain yield (kg/ ha)
SD Stem diameter DPW Dry panicle weight kg/ plot BYH Biological yield (kg/ ha)
NSP Number of seeds/ panicle NPTP Productive tillers/ plant
Table 7: Path coefficient analysis of the direct and indirect
effect of five yield components and their genotypic
correlation coefficients with grain yield/ plant in pearl millet
genotypes at four sites in 2005/06 season.
Effect on grain yield plant (g)
Indirect effect via
Character Direct
effect
Productive
tillers/plant
Panicle
length
(cm)
Panicle
width
(cm)
Number
of seeds/
panicle
1000
seeds
weight
(g)
Genotypic
correlation
with grain
yield/
plant
Productive
tillers/plant
0.286 0.176 0.065 0.081 0.142 0.464
Panicle length
(cm)
0.510 0.176 -0.403 0.195 0.074 0.593
Panicle width (cm) 0.223 0.065 -0.403 0.537 -0.221 0.226
Number of
seeds/panicle
0.119 0.081 0.195 0.537 -0.461 0.457
1000 seeds weight
(g)
-0.022 0.599 0.074 -0.221 -0.461 0.036
Residual 0.664
 The improved varieties generally showed good yield performance
than the local ones for most of the traits studied.
 The performance of the genotypes was greater under irrigated clay
soil conditions (Shambat site).
 The phenotypic coefficients of variation were higher than the
genotypic coefficients of variation for all the traits studied.
CONCULSIONS
 Grain yield/ plant and harvest index showed high values for both
genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation, this indicates the
importance of these traits in selection for grain yield improvement.
 Very high to moderate heritability estimates were observed for most
of the agronomic traits studied.
 High Heritability coupled with high genetic advance as percentage
of mean were recorded for Grain yield/ hectare, grain yield/plant,
harvest index and dry panicle weight/ plot. These traits can be
useful as selection criteria for yield improvement.
 The study revealed that the genotypic correlation coefficients were
generally higher than the corresponding phenotypic ones. This
indicates the presence of genetic variability among genotypes for
the agronomic traits studied.
 The results revealed that grain yield/ plant may be the best indicator
in selection for grain yield improvement, as well as harvest index,
dry panicles weight/ plot, panicle length, number of panicles/ plot
and productive tillers/ plant.
 Path coefficient analysis revealed that, among yield components,
panicle length had the highest direct effect on grain yield /plant,
followed by productive tillers/ plant and panicle width.
CONTACT: omarbakhit@yahoo.com.
Mobile Phone: 0915085680

More Related Content

What's hot

Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...
Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...
Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...Agriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
Comparison of the effectiveness of zero tillage and
Comparison of the effectiveness  of zero tillage andComparison of the effectiveness  of zero tillage and
Comparison of the effectiveness of zero tillage andAlexander Decker
 
STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...
STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...
STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...Vipin Pandey
 
Activity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleoptera
Activity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleopteraActivity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleoptera
Activity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleopteraAlexander Decker
 
Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)
Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)
Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)BABLUHRANGKHAWL
 
Effect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of Mungbean
Effect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of MungbeanEffect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of Mungbean
Effect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of MungbeanSYED TARIK MAHABUB
 
Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...
Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...
Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...Journal of Agriculture and Crops
 
Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...
Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...
Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...ICRISAT
 
Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...
Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...
Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...IJEAB
 
Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...
Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...
Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...AkeMamo
 
Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India”
Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India” Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India”
Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India” Pradeep Yadav
 
Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...
Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...
Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...Innspub Net
 
Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...
Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...
Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...Innspub Net
 
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...Premier Publishers
 
Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...
Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...
Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...Humidtropics, a CGIAR Research Program
 
Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...
Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...
Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...iosrjce
 

What's hot (20)

Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...
Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...
Soil Population Density, Kernel Infection and Aflatoxin Contamination in Grou...
 
Comparison of the effectiveness of zero tillage and
Comparison of the effectiveness  of zero tillage andComparison of the effectiveness  of zero tillage and
Comparison of the effectiveness of zero tillage and
 
STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...
STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...
STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN INDIGENOUS RICE (OR...
 
Rice Res. strategies - vivek
Rice Res. strategies - vivekRice Res. strategies - vivek
Rice Res. strategies - vivek
 
Activity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleoptera
Activity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleopteraActivity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleoptera
Activity of callosobruchus maculatus (f.) (coleoptera
 
Pathak, s. and dutta, a. k. (2019)
Pathak, s. and dutta, a. k. (2019)Pathak, s. and dutta, a. k. (2019)
Pathak, s. and dutta, a. k. (2019)
 
Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)
Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)
Ppt agri.engg362 (bablu)
 
Effect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of Mungbean
Effect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of MungbeanEffect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of Mungbean
Effect of Cow Manure on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of Mungbean
 
0728 Insect-Pest Dynamics and Arthropod Diversity in SRI and Conventional Met...
0728 Insect-Pest Dynamics and Arthropod Diversity in SRI and Conventional Met...0728 Insect-Pest Dynamics and Arthropod Diversity in SRI and Conventional Met...
0728 Insect-Pest Dynamics and Arthropod Diversity in SRI and Conventional Met...
 
Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...
Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...
Evaluation of Seedling Establishment Palatability and Acceptability Tests of ...
 
Wheat
WheatWheat
Wheat
 
Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...
Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...
Determining transpiration efficiency of bmr sorghum genotypes for progressive...
 
Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...
Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...
Assessment of the Relative Suitability of Three Different Soils for Dry Seaso...
 
Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...
Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...
Shade, Litter, Nematodes, Earthworms, Termites and Companion Trees in Coffee ...
 
Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India”
Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India” Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India”
Current status and future prospects of mungbean research in India”
 
Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...
Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...
Effect of sowing year and seedbed type on yield and yield component in bambar...
 
Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...
Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...
Integrating striga resistant maize and spatial arrangement of intercropped co...
 
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...
Evaluation of Improved Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) Varieties for Adaptation ...
 
Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...
Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...
Participatory evaluation of farmer preferences and productivity of selected n...
 
Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...
Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...
Effect of Transplanting date on the Growth and Yield of Aromatic Rice in Irri...
 

Viewers also liked

Individual punishment research
Individual punishment researchIndividual punishment research
Individual punishment researchMechelle Davidson
 
The BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball Appetite
The BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball AppetiteThe BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball Appetite
The BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball AppetiteAdedamilola Adedotun
 
Path To Market - An AbamsaQuaf Publication
Path To Market - An AbamsaQuaf PublicationPath To Market - An AbamsaQuaf Publication
Path To Market - An AbamsaQuaf PublicationAdedamilola Adedotun
 
2016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 2016
2016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 20162016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 2016
2016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 2016David Scott Waller
 
BRIC_web_redesign_2015
BRIC_web_redesign_2015BRIC_web_redesign_2015
BRIC_web_redesign_2015Mélanie Wider
 
YOUR LINKEDIN DESIGN
YOUR LINKEDIN DESIGNYOUR LINKEDIN DESIGN
YOUR LINKEDIN DESIGNJane Wilhem
 
Η ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑ
Η ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑΗ ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑ
Η ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑFay_del1
 
ΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩ
ΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩ
ΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩFay_del1
 
Lululemon App redesign
Lululemon App redesignLululemon App redesign
Lululemon App redesignMélanie Wider
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Individual punishment research
Individual punishment researchIndividual punishment research
Individual punishment research
 
The BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball Appetite
The BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball AppetiteThe BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball Appetite
The BballNaija Newsletter - The Increasing Basketball Appetite
 
Path To Market - An AbamsaQuaf Publication
Path To Market - An AbamsaQuaf PublicationPath To Market - An AbamsaQuaf Publication
Path To Market - An AbamsaQuaf Publication
 
2016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 2016
2016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 20162016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 2016
2016 Resume' David Scott Waller BV1 25 May 2016
 
BRIC_web_redesign_2015
BRIC_web_redesign_2015BRIC_web_redesign_2015
BRIC_web_redesign_2015
 
YOUR LINKEDIN DESIGN
YOUR LINKEDIN DESIGNYOUR LINKEDIN DESIGN
YOUR LINKEDIN DESIGN
 
Pro schoolskpi plan
Pro schoolskpi planPro schoolskpi plan
Pro schoolskpi plan
 
Η ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑ
Η ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑΗ ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑ
Η ΜΥΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΝΑ
 
ΤΑ ΖΑ
ΤΑ ΖΑΤΑ ΖΑ
ΤΑ ΖΑ
 
ΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩ
ΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩ
ΖΑΒΑΛΗ ΜΑΙΚΩ
 
Lululemon App redesign
Lululemon App redesignLululemon App redesign
Lululemon App redesign
 

Similar to Omar presentation

Diversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzania
Diversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzaniaDiversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzania
Diversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzaniaAlexander Decker
 
Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...
Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...
Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...Innspub Net
 
Presentation on Rice Cultivation
Presentation on Rice CultivationPresentation on Rice Cultivation
Presentation on Rice CultivationRitabrataSarkar3
 
Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...
Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...
Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...Premier Publishers
 
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...Premier Publishers
 
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...Premier Publishers
 
New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...
New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...
New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...Maarouf Mohammed
 
Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...
Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...
Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...Premier Publishers
 
Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...
Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...
Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...Premier Publishers
 
Barley seed production
Barley seed productionBarley seed production
Barley seed productionRajRajani5
 
Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...
Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...
Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...Innspub Net
 
Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...
Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...
Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...Journal of Agriculture and Crops
 
Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...
Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...
Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...Innspub Net
 
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean Alexander Decker
 
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early Maturity
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early MaturityScreening of Castor Genotypes for Early Maturity
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early MaturityPremier Publishers
 
Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...
Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...
Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...Journal of Agriculture and Crops
 
morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...
morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...
morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...IJEAB
 
Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986
Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986
Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986SDAU
 
Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...
Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...
Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...Premier Publishers
 

Similar to Omar presentation (20)

Diversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzania
Diversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzaniaDiversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzania
Diversity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor l. moench) germplasm from tanzania
 
Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...
Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...
Evaluation of some maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for resistance to stem borer...
 
Presentation on Rice Cultivation
Presentation on Rice CultivationPresentation on Rice Cultivation
Presentation on Rice Cultivation
 
Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...
Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...
Variability and Association of Yield and Yield Component Traits of Durum Whea...
 
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...
Performance Evaluation of released Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variet...
 
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...
Performance evaluation of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and variability study...
 
New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...
New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...
New Sudangrass forage cultivars selected from the original population (Sorghu...
 
Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...
Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...
Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at B...
 
Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...
Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...
Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, genetic advance as percen...
 
Barley seed production
Barley seed productionBarley seed production
Barley seed production
 
Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...
Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...
Impact of climate on seed morphology and plant growth of Caesalpinia bonduc L...
 
Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...
Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...
Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench) as Affected by Pl...
 
Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...
Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...
Phenotypic variability and racial classification of landraces of sorghum (Sor...
 
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean
Variation in grain yield and other agronomic traits in soybean
 
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early Maturity
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early MaturityScreening of Castor Genotypes for Early Maturity
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early Maturity
 
Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...
Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...
Performance Evaluation of Early Maturing Ground Nut Varieties in West Guji lo...
 
Phenotypic Diversity for Qualitative Characters of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare (L...
Phenotypic Diversity for Qualitative Characters of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare (L...Phenotypic Diversity for Qualitative Characters of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare (L...
Phenotypic Diversity for Qualitative Characters of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare (L...
 
morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...
morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...
morphological and physiological variation of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri...
 
Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986
Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986
Recent advancement in rust resistence in wheat,dayanand, 01986
 
Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...
Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...
Investigation of Correlation Coefficient for Forage and Grain Yield with Rela...
 

Recently uploaded

Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptxAnimal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptxUmerFayaz5
 
Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.
Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.
Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.k64182334
 
Scheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docx
Scheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docxScheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docx
Scheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docxyaramohamed343013
 
Work, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE Physics
Work, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE PhysicsWork, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE Physics
Work, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE Physicsvishikhakeshava1
 
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptxAnalytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptxSwapnil Therkar
 
Artificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C P
Artificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C PArtificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C P
Artificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C PPRINCE C P
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡anilsa9823
 
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTSérgio Sacani
 
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )aarthirajkumar25
 
Luciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptx
Luciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptxLuciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptx
Luciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptxAleenaTreesaSaji
 
PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...
PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...
PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...Sérgio Sacani
 
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...Nistarini College, Purulia (W.B) India
 
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsNatural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsAArockiyaNisha
 
Dashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tanta
Dashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tantaDashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tanta
Dashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tantaPraksha3
 
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 trNeurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 trssuser06f238
 
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptxGFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptxAleenaTreesaSaji
 
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Patrick Diehl
 
TOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physics
TOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physicsTOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physics
TOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physicsssuserddc89b
 
Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)
Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)
Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)DHURKADEVIBASKAR
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptxAnimal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
 
Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.
Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.
Genomic DNA And Complementary DNA Libraries construction.
 
Scheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docx
Scheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docxScheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docx
Scheme-of-Work-Science-Stage-4 cambridge science.docx
 
Work, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE Physics
Work, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE PhysicsWork, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE Physics
Work, Energy and Power for class 10 ICSE Physics
 
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptxAnalytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
 
Artificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C P
Artificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C PArtificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C P
Artificial Intelligence In Microbiology by Dr. Prince C P
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
 
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
 
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
 
Luciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptx
Luciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptxLuciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptx
Luciferase in rDNA technology (biotechnology).pptx
 
PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...
PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...
PossibleEoarcheanRecordsoftheGeomagneticFieldPreservedintheIsuaSupracrustalBe...
 
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
 
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsNatural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
 
Dashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tanta
Dashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tantaDashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tanta
Dashanga agada a formulation of Agada tantra dealt in 3 Rd year bams agada tanta
 
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 trNeurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
 
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptxGFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
 
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
 
TOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physics
TOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physicsTOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physics
TOPIC 8 Temperature and Heat.pdf physics
 
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomyEngler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
 
Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)
Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)
Recombinant DNA technology( Transgenic plant and animal)
 

Omar presentation

  • 1. ‫الرحيم‬ ‫الرحمن‬ ‫ال‬ ‫بسم‬ A Study on Genetic Variability, Interrelationships among some Agronomic Traits and Path Coefficient Analysis in Pearl Millet ‫اللؤلؤي‬ ‫الدخن‬ ‫في‬ ‫المسار‬ ‫معامل‬ ‫وتحليل‬ ‫الحقلية‬ ‫الصفات‬ ‫بعض‬ ‫ارتباط‬ ،‫الوراثي‬ ‫التباين‬ ‫دراسة‬ By Omar Abdalla Bakhit Hassan M.Sc. presentation Supervisor Dr. El hag Hassan Abuelgasim 23 February 2010
  • 2. INTRODUCTION  Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.)R.Br) or "Dukhun", is a cereal crop belonging to section Panacea of the family Poaceae.  Pearl millet is a robust, diploid species (2n=14), cross-pollinated grass with immense genetic diversity.  The center of origin for pearl millet stretching from Western Sudan to Senegal.
  • 3.  It's planted across a wide range of It's environments around the world.  grown as a subsistence grain and forage crop for livestock. Also its stalk can be used as building material or as fuel.  Pearl millet comes as the sixth among cereal crops in the world in terms of production, coming after wheat, rice, maize, barley and sorghum.
  • 4. PEARL MILLET WORLD’S PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY:  The world total grown area, in 2006 was 36.297 million hectares.  produced 32.074 million metrics tones.  The world average grain yield was ranged from and 883.6 kg/ha for the year 2006.
  • 5. PEARL MILLET IN SUDAN:  Is a preferred food crop for the majority of the inhabitants of Western Sudan.  In terms of both area and production it ranks second after sorghum.  The crop is almost exclusively raised under rain-fed conditions with 97% of the total area in the country being raised under traditional farming conditions.  About 95% of the crop area is found in Western Sudan (Kordofan and Darfur states) mainly in the extensive sandy soil zone.  The annual average rainfall in the millet growing areas varies from 200 mm to 750 mm, falling during a short rainy season of 2 to 4 months.
  • 6. PEARL MILLET IN SUDAN (Cont):  The annual average rainfall in the millet growing areas varies from 200 mm to 750 mm, falling during a short rainy season of 2 to 4 months.  The crop was grown on 2.256 million hectares producing 0.792 million metric tones in 2006 (FAO, 2007).  The average yield of grain per hectare in Sudan was 351 Kg/ha, in 2006.
  • 7. CONSTRAINTS OF PRODUCTION:  The low and unreliable rainfall comes first since 99% of the area cultivated depends on rainfall.  The poor genetic stocks cultivated by farmers  Pests and diseases cause serious damage to the crop.  The poor cultural practices followed by farmers.  Lack of agricultural services and inputs.  Lack of financing and extension services.
  • 8. OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY:  To obtain information on genetic variability of agronomic traits in local and exotic pearl millet genotypes.  To study the genotypic and phenotypic interrelationships between the different pairs of various agronomic traits.  To study the path coefficient analysis of some important agronomic traits and their direct and indirect effects on grain yield.
  • 9. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: [1] Materials:  Sites: El shegaila, Beinu and El jekka in rain fed areas (North Kordofan state), and Shambat was planted under irrigation area in (Khartoum state).  Genotypes: The 18 local and exotic genotypes were tested.  Design: Randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications was used.  The experimental plot: consisted of 4 rows of 5 meter length, with a spacing of 75 cm between rows and 50 cm between plant holes. Six to eight seeds were sown in each hole.  Recommended agronomic practices were used.
  • 10. Table 1: The pearl millet genotypes used in the study of genetic variability and interrelationships among different traits No Genotype Origin Note source 1 Ashana ICRISAT Released ARC-Sudan 2 Ugandi Uganda Released ARC-Sudan 3 Dembe (Um shegaira) Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan 4 Aish burno West Africa Collection ARC-Sudan 5 Um gerfa Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan 6 GB 87-35 ICRISAT promising ARC-Sudan 7 Bauda Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan 8 Demde yellow Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan 9 Dahabaya ARC promising ARC-Sudan 10 Local Kordofani Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan 11 Sudan II ICRISAT promising ARC-Sudan 12 HSD 2254 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan 13 HSD 2260 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan 14 HSD 2261 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan 15 HSD 2279 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan 16 HSD 2348 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan 17 HSD 2380 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan 18 HSD 2416 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan
  • 11. [2] Data collection:  All measurements were taken from the two central rows in each plot.  The 17 agronomic traits were measured which includes :  plant population/ hectare.  Days to 50% to flowering.  days to 95% maturity.  plant height (cm).  stem diameter (cm).  productive tillers/ plant.  panicle length (cm).  panicle width (cm).
  • 12. [2] Data collection (Cont):  number of panicles/ plot.  dry panicles/ plot.  number of seeds/ panicle.  1000 seed weight (g).  grain yield/ plant (g).  grain yield/ hectare (kg).  biological yield/ hectare (kg).  threshing percentage.  harvest index.
  • 13. [3] Statistical analysis :  Single site and combined analysis – MSTAT-C software.  Mean separation (LSD 0.05).  Phenotypic, genotypic and variation.  Heritability (Hanson et al. 1956).  Phenotypic coefficients of variation (Burton 1952).  Genotypic coefficients of variation (Burton 1952).  Genetic advance and percentage genetic advance (Johnson et al. 1955).  Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients (Miller et al. , 1958) .  Path coefficients analysis (Dewey and Lu ,1959) .
  • 14. RESULTS  Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences among locations for all traits.  Highly significant differences among genotypes were observed for most of the traits studied.  Significant differences for genotypes x locations interactions were detected for most of the traits.
  • 15. Table 2: Overall means average for the different characters in 18 pearl millet genotypes at four sites in 2005/06 season. SiteCharacter El shegaila Beinu El jekka Shambat Grand mean Plant population/ha 27842 36408 16008 36209 29130 50% days to flowering 69.98 59.10 75.06 66.07 68.01 95% days to maturity 99.48 89.29 105.07 96.61 97.79 Plant height (cm) 164.75 151.208 142.63 180.83 159.84 Stem diameter (cm) 1.039 0.878 0.992 1.18 1.03 Productive tillers/plant 1.39 1.625 1.751 3.67 2.18 Panicle length (cm) 23.19 24.590 24.849 22.16 24.26 Panicle width (cm) 2.56 2.400 2.403 2.30 2.42 No of panicles/ plot 50.58 66.111 30.910 168.04 79.00 Dry panicles wt. (kg)/plot 1.04 1.208 0.971 3.86 1.801 No of seeds/panicle 1530 1234 1312 1450 1381 1000 seeds weight (g) 8.69 7.07 7.77 8.09 7.93 Grain yield (g)/plant 20.40 14.454 30.09 54.89 30.12 Grain yield (kg)/ha 541.198 529.644 450.554 1546.280 766.919 Biological yield (kg)/ha 3303.174 4223.833 1942.626 8478.773 4486.978 Threshing % 54.76 48.02 55.09 46.12 51.02 Harvest index % 16.21 12.790 23.60 18.32 17.77
  • 16. Table 3: Means for different characters of 18 pearl millet genotypes evaluated at four sites in 2005/06 season. Genotype Plant Population /ha Days to 50% flowering Days to 95% maturity Plant Height (cm) Stem Diameter (cm) Productive Tillers/plant Ashana 26934 59.19 86.44 152.92 1.04 2.30 Ugandi 26827 58.25 85.25 156.77 1.17 2.57 Dembe (Um shegaira) 29663 77.31 107.25 163.25 1.12 2.01 Aish burno 28996 71.06 101.50 166.76 0.99 1.98 Um gerfa 27717 73.13 104.12 146.84 0.96 1.88 GB 87-35 28880 59.44 86.81 150.93 1.00 2.17 Bauda 28676 62.50 92.38 149.02 0.91 2.33 Demde yellow 30880 63.25 93.19 155.12 1.08 2.63 Dahabaya 29876 67.19 98.44 163.61 1.01 2.16 Local Kordofani 31049 72.75 103.63 160.37 0.99 2.35 Sudan II 27823 58.81 86.38 171.55 1.00 2.26 HSD 2254 30933 74.00 105.06 180.84 1.00 2.17 HSD 2260 27939 72.44 102.56 173.66 1.11 2.20 HSD 2261 29625 71.44 102.06 167.63 1.07 1.97 HSD 2279 28160 68.94 99.38 148.88 0.96 2.24 HSD 2348 31885 69.06 99.31 153.69 1.03 2.00 HSD 2380 28046 70.81 101.00 155.85 1.03 2.08 HSD 2416 30436 75.00 105.44 159.67 1.03 2.03 Mean 29130 68.01 97.79 159.84 1.03 2.18 SE ± 406** 0.636** 0.665** 1.84** 0.015** 0.055** C.V% 15.68 9.81 7.84 10.63 11.28 19.71
  • 17. Table 3: Continued …. Genotype Panicle Length (cm) Panicle Width (cm) No of Panicle /plot Dry panicle Weight (kg)/plot No of seeds /panicle 1000-seed Wt.(g) Ashana 24.20 2.62 75.50 1.567 1299 8.25 Ugandi 25.41 2.44 87.44 1.563 1213 8.59 Dembe (Um shegaira) 23.80 2.59 73.19 1.830 1498 7.16 Aish burno 24.07 2.02 70.69 1.325 996 7.84 Um gerfa 24.60 2.43 63.44 1.656 1430 7.93 GB 87-35 23.68 2.41 78.44 1.580 1265 8.44 Bauda 25.28 2.32 85.47 1.762 1195 7.71 Demde yellow 24.33 2.53 97.25 2.266 1519 8.51 Dahabaya 25.86 2.41 83.94 2.325 1493 8.07 Local Kordofani 23.40 2.49 90.81 1.842 1507 7.91 Sudan II 30.66 2.13 77.63 1.928 1603 7.80 HSD 2254 23.24 1.91 81.56 1.877 1183 8.17 HSD 2260 23.87 2.44 80.67 1.689 1560 7.55 HSD 2261 23.43 2.44 75.88 1.769 1201 8.32 HSD 2279 21.08 2.54 78.25 2.148 1499 7.25 HSD 2348 23.37 2.44 78.75 1.667 1343 7.74 HSD 2380 23.41 2.68 69.06 1.631 1478 7.97 HSD 2416 23.05 2.66 74.56 1.992 1579 7.57 Mean 24.26 2.42 79.00 1.801 1381 7.93 SE ± 0.265** 0.030** 1.519** 0.039** 26** 0.104** C.V% 9.98 11.87 20.57 17.55 15.80 11.17 LSD (0.05) 1.68 0.19 11.76 0.22 151.30 0.61
  • 18. Table 3: Continued …. Genotype Grain Yield (g)/ plant Grain Yield(kg)/ha Biological Yield(kg)/ha Threshing % Harvest Index % Ashana 34.75 835.347 3528.008 57.86 22.05 Ugandi 33.48 782.027 35902.212 58.80 20.44 Dembe (Um shegaira) 29.92 746.480 4140.748 51.04 17.15 Aish burno 23.71 568.747 3847.928 52.34 15.84 Um gerfa 25.74 617.624 3385.82 47.10 16.96 GB 87-35 31.96 768.697 3807.938 58.30 19.58 Bauda 33.40 764.254 3528.008 54.67 19.05 Demde yellow 34.71 958.872 4179.401 53.58 18.44 Dahabaya 36.45 710.045 4345.58 49.50 18.45 Local Kordofani 26.24 694.938 4381.128 45.84 15.40 Sudan II 39.35 905.552 3910.135 55.78 24.30 HSD 2254 25.98 686.051 4336.695 41.98 15.05 HSD 2260 26.84 662.057 4185.620 44.46 15.69 HSD 2261 28.69 692.272 4007.888 48.33 15.53 HSD 2279 28.83 729.596 4221.168 45.83 17.78 HSD 2348 23.01 640.729 4025.660 51.40 15.10 HSD 2380 25.83 614.958 4104.64 48.52 14.89 HSD 2416 32.97 854.009 4274.488 53.37 18.15 Mean 30.12 735.816 4012.330 51.04 17.77 SE ± 1.07** 14.667** 75.333* 0.860** 0.477** C.V% 23.65 21.47 20.05 12.12 21.81 LSD (0.05) 4.93 3.27 18.79 4.24 2.53
  • 19. Table 4: Means for grain yield (kg)/ha of 18 pearl millet genotypes evaluated in 2005/06 season. site Genotype El shegaila Beinu El jekka Shambat Grand mean Ashana 529.645 833.125 461.180 1762.226 835.347 Ugandi 457.663 840.679 412.340 1557.833 782.027 Dembe (Um shegaira) 507.429 434.558 520.759 1625.370 746.480 Aish burno 494.099 399.900 380.014 1051.293 568.747 Um gerfa 531.423 419.451 359.910 1239.69 617.624 GB 87-35 532.310 780.248 506.667 1162.376 768.697 Bauda 510.982 432.781 391.012 1816.435 764.254 Demde yellow 481.656 444.332 484.322 2090.144 958.872 Dahabaya 774.916 439.890 321.696 2240.329 710.045 Local Kordofani 668.276 491.433 321.692 1412.98 694.938 Sudan II 572.300 684.272 526.978 1885.751 905.552 HSD 2254 455.886 545.640 446.998 1356.106 686.051 HSD 2260 622.067 566.081 402.566 1151.712 662.057 HSD 2261 505.650 437.225 427.449 1479.63 692.272 HSD 2279 614.069 503.874 399.900 1498.292 729.596 HSD 2348 501.208 423.004 299.481 1359.660 640.729 HSD 2380 486.988 333.250 418.562 1331.223 614.958 HSD 2416 558.083 532.310 490.544 1812.880 854.009 Mean 541.198 529.644 431.002 1546.280 735.816 SE ± 30.666 26.400 31.33 53.333 14.667 C.V% 28.91 27.65 38.31 19.47 21.47 LSD (0.05) 4.12 3.54 3.87 7.18 3.27
  • 20. Table 5: Estimate of phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV %), Genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV %), heritability (h²), expected genetic advance from section (GA) and genetic advance as percentage of mean (GA %) for agronomic traits in 18 pearl millet genotypes tested at four sites in 2005/06 season. CHARACTER (PCV %) (GCV %) (h²) (GA) (GA %) Plant population/ha 17.21 6.62 0.147 1.71 5.24 50% days to flowering 19.32 16.64 0.742 20.03 29.53 95% days to maturity 15.31 13.15 0.738 22.89 23.26 Plant height (cm) 14.97 10.53 0.495 24.40 15.26 Stem diameter (cm) 15.19 10.17 0.448 0.145 14.02 Productive tillers/ plant 25.09 15.53 0.383 0.45 19.79 Panicle length (cm) 17.36 14.21 0.67 5.81 23.95 Panicle width (cm) 20.47 16.68 0.66 0.68 27.99 No of panicles/ plot 28.44 19.64 0.48 23.04 27.93 Dry panicles wt. (kg)/plot 33.52 28.56 0.73 0.89 50.13 No of seeds/panicle 28.49 23.71 0.69 561.73 40.65 1000 seeds weight (g) 14.33 8.97 0.39 0.92 11.57 Grain yield (g)/plant 35.03 25.83 0.54 11.8 39.24 Grain yield kg/ha 38.07 31.44 0.68 0.39 53.47 Biological yield kg ha 23.71 12.59 0.28 0.624 13.78 Threshing % 24.57 21.33 0.75 19.12 38.13 Harvest index % 37.89 30.98 0.67 8.73 52.20
  • 21. Table 6: Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients between different pairs of traits in 18 pearl millet genotypes evaluated at four sites in 2005/06 season. TRAIT DTF DTM PLH SD NPTP PNL PNW NP DPWT NSP TGWT GYP GYH BYH THP HI DTF 1.006** 0.366 -0.005 -0.69** -0.59** 0.061 -0.426 0.137 0.173 -0.590** -0.573* -0.573* 0.723** -0.89** 0.946** DTM 0.972** 0.336 -0.078 -0.65** -0.60** 0.045 -0.374 0.173 0.176 -0.527* -0.570* -0.571* 0.74** -0.93** -0.95** PLH 0.193 0.186 0.258 -0.097 0.233 -0.72** 0.036 0.053 -0.064 -0.084 -0.159 -0.107 0.782** -0.305 -0.199 SD 0.018 -0.059 0.313 0.433 -0.085 0.367 0.416 -0.147 0.116 0.316 0.102 0.177 0.358 0.189 -0.038 NPTP -0.437 0.413 0.060 0.217 0.179 0.065 0.941** 0.188 0.084 0.599** 0.468* 0.614** -0.038 0.399 0.532* PNL 0.421 -0.429 0.197 0.028 0.093 -0.403 0.113 0.119 0.204 0.075 0.593** 0.522* -0.344 0.515* 0.721** PNW 0.003 0.006 0.296 0.320 0.103 0.207 -0.014 0. 112 0.564* -0.220 0.226 0.187 -0.087 0.037 -0.047 NP 0.324 0.285 0.157 0.243 0.839** 0.121 0.053 0.308 0.076 0.459 0.392 0.517* 0.133 0.161 0.291 DPWT 0.061 0.097 0.154 0.050 0.176 0.106 0.161 0.295 0.663** -0.318 0.675** 0.574* 0.437 -0.355 -0.025 NSP 0.079 0.072 0.020 0.086 0.027 0.188 0.455 0.036 0.520* -0.445 0.457 0.383 0.512* -0.234 -0.017 TGWT 0.317 0.303 0.098 0.221 0.324 0.137 0.000 0.286 -0.019 0.233 0.036 0.245 -0.507 0.429 0.236 GYP 0.381 0.382 0.017 0.021 0.321 0.352 0.202 0.210 0.596** 0.358 0.093 0.978** -0.197 0.455 0.720** GYH -0.439 0.425 0.006 0.133 0.375 0.358 0.193 0.407 0.642** 0.368 0.251 0.832** -0.231 0.522* 0.719** BYH 0.265 0.297 0.489* 0.229 0.139 0.106 0.113 0.255 0.396 0.309 0.023 0.042 0.104 -0.83** -0.68** THP 0.655** -0.69** -0.157 0.127 0.192 0.385 0.016 0.081 0.291 0.204 0.252 0.363 0.423 0.346 0.893** HI 0.665** 0.661** 0.117 0.088 0.289 0.491* 0.027 0.166 0.064 0.035 0.158 0.620** 0.632** 0.286 0.736** The genotypic correlations are the upper triangle and phenotypic correlations in the lower one. *, ** and ns are the level of significance at 5%, 1% and non-significant, respectively. D.f = n-2=16, r 5%= 0.468, r 1% = 0.590 Legend: DTF Days to flowering PNL Panicle length (cm) TSWT 1000 grains weight (g) HI Harvest index DTM Days to maturity PNW Panicle width (cm) GYP Grain yield per plant (g) THP Threshing% PLH Plant height (cm) NP Number of panicle/ plot GYH Grain yield (kg/ ha) SD Stem diameter DPW Dry panicle weight kg/ plot BYH Biological yield (kg/ ha) NSP Number of seeds/ panicle NPTP Productive tillers/ plant
  • 22. Table 7: Path coefficient analysis of the direct and indirect effect of five yield components and their genotypic correlation coefficients with grain yield/ plant in pearl millet genotypes at four sites in 2005/06 season. Effect on grain yield plant (g) Indirect effect via Character Direct effect Productive tillers/plant Panicle length (cm) Panicle width (cm) Number of seeds/ panicle 1000 seeds weight (g) Genotypic correlation with grain yield/ plant Productive tillers/plant 0.286 0.176 0.065 0.081 0.142 0.464 Panicle length (cm) 0.510 0.176 -0.403 0.195 0.074 0.593 Panicle width (cm) 0.223 0.065 -0.403 0.537 -0.221 0.226 Number of seeds/panicle 0.119 0.081 0.195 0.537 -0.461 0.457 1000 seeds weight (g) -0.022 0.599 0.074 -0.221 -0.461 0.036 Residual 0.664
  • 23.  The improved varieties generally showed good yield performance than the local ones for most of the traits studied.  The performance of the genotypes was greater under irrigated clay soil conditions (Shambat site).  The phenotypic coefficients of variation were higher than the genotypic coefficients of variation for all the traits studied. CONCULSIONS
  • 24.  Grain yield/ plant and harvest index showed high values for both genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation, this indicates the importance of these traits in selection for grain yield improvement.  Very high to moderate heritability estimates were observed for most of the agronomic traits studied.  High Heritability coupled with high genetic advance as percentage of mean were recorded for Grain yield/ hectare, grain yield/plant, harvest index and dry panicle weight/ plot. These traits can be useful as selection criteria for yield improvement.
  • 25.  The study revealed that the genotypic correlation coefficients were generally higher than the corresponding phenotypic ones. This indicates the presence of genetic variability among genotypes for the agronomic traits studied.
  • 26.  The results revealed that grain yield/ plant may be the best indicator in selection for grain yield improvement, as well as harvest index, dry panicles weight/ plot, panicle length, number of panicles/ plot and productive tillers/ plant.  Path coefficient analysis revealed that, among yield components, panicle length had the highest direct effect on grain yield /plant, followed by productive tillers/ plant and panicle width.