Why Was Charles Town Difficult Essay

Why Was Charles Town Difficult Essay
Why was Charles Town Difficult to Settle? Settlers that came to America, specifically Charles
Town, always had hope but their futures were never certain. The Spanish were the first Europeans to
explore South Carolina. More land meant more riches and power, which is exactly what they were
looking for. Unfortunately they ran into some problems such as unfavorable weather, sickness, low
food supplies, and rancor from the natives therefore, the Spanish departed. About four decades later,
Jean Ribault brought a group of French Huguenots to South Carolina in search of religious freedom.
Along with the French, the Spanish made several attempts, but didn't succeed. In 1621, a grant was
given to Sir Robert Heath by King Charles I of England to try and settle the area below the Virginia
colony. The first attempt failed and he lost the grant, but later Charles II rewarded eight men with
the ownership of the land called Carolina. These eight men were called the Lords Proprietors. In
1670, a settlement was founded at ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"There arise in many places fine savannahs, or wide extended plains, which do not produce any
trees; these are a kind of natural lawns, and some of them as beautiful as those made by art."
(Document B) Early settlers found South Carolina beautiful, but as beautiful as it was it wasn't good
for hiding or protection because there was flat land. If there was a battle, there would be no hiding
places like trees or hills. It was a straight shot, an open field. This is a huge disadvantage, even if the
land was beautiful. The animal life in Carolina was very dangerous. "... Being and endless numbers
of panthers, tigers, wolves, deer, and other beasts of prey..." (Document C). Not only was there
protecting uncertainties, there were dangerous animals that could be very harmful. Charles Town
was difficult to settle because of the lack of protection on the land and the menacing animals around
the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Decline Of The 19th Century
Prior to the 15th century Europe had not much, if any, knowledge of the new world. Content with
many small kingdoms and farms, there was no reason to explore. The economy was limited and life
was simple. However, by the latter part of the century, conditions changed and Europe's views did as
well. At this time the population experienced tremendous growth. This was definitely a motive for
expansion since the economy which was once very weak was now beginning to boom. Europe was
truly breaking into a modern age.
This movement is referred to as the Renaissance or "rebirth". European government, commerce, and
technology were on the rise. Governments became more powerful monarchs created nation states.
These nations developed their own armies, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Spain, Portugal, and France desired to build Catholic empires in the new world. Columbus thought
himself to be chosen by God to embark on his journey. The Dutch and English desired to convert the
natives of the new world to Protestantism. Many went simply to be free to practice their faith
according to their own conscience and in their own form. In 1606 James I of England gave charters
to the London Company and Plymouth Company to try to establish colonies in the new land.
England's attempts until now were unsuccessful. The London Company landed in what they named
Jamestown in 1607. The colonists needed to not only make a profit for the company, but they
needed to survive. This proved to be nearly impossible. Jamestown was not well suited for
cultivation. The humid summer led to outbreaks of malaria and it was situated in the midst of Native
American territories. By 1608 Captain John Smith took over the leadership of the colony and saved
it from the same fate the previous colonists had suffered. The London Company, now Virginia
Company, received another charter in 1609 from the King. It gave the colonists more land and less
power. The idea was to sell stock to people who would remain in England but share future company
profits, give stock to planters that would journey to the colony on their own, and transport people for
free in return for serving the company for seven years. Things did not turn out as planned.

Shaping Colonial America Essay
Many different things affected the shaping of colonial America in the new world. Factors such as
colonialism, geography, and religion affected the way North America was formed and dictated how
other people look at colonial America. Colonialism affected America's demographic and also the
ease of forming colonies in the new world. Geography also played a roll in shaping the identity of
America. Geography affected where people settled based on the layout of rivers, ocean, and
waterways. People also settled in places where they could grow crops. Geography also attracted
colonists. Finally, religion affected the forming of colonial America. People were driven from
England because of religion. Also, religion affected where people settled down. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Boston, which at that time was called Shawmut, was settled on a peninsula that jutted out into the
bay. People also settled along water for military reasons. Take for example, Jamestown, Virginia,
which was settled some 60 miles up the James River, on a peninsula. Here there was a good view up
and down the river, which made it easy to defend attacks by land or water. New Amsterdam, which
is present day New York, was another colony that settled on the waterfront for military reasons. New
Amsterdam settled on a island, which is present day Manhattan, with a good view in all directions.
This made it easy to defend. Even more colonies were settled along water in colonial America. In
the 17th century, several European countries founded settlements along the St. Lawrence River. The
waterways were also a major reason why France and England originally came to North America.
Two dreams originally attracted France and England to North America; kingdoms rich with gold,
and a water route to Asia. All in all, rivers and oceans played a major role in the settling of America.
Without them, the United States would look much different today.
The ability to grow crops also helped shape the identity of America. The crops in America were able
to feed large numbers of people, which attracted colonists. (Eventually, these crops were introduced
worldwide, which was part of the reason the world's population quadrupled in the next three
hundred years.)

Hugh Jacob Llwyd Research Paper
Welsh from Wales in the united kingdom Llwyds moved to Canada before moving to the US. Hugh
Jacob Llwyd was the first minister of Grace Episcopal Church in Muskogee, Ok, and has two alter
windows more than 10 feet tall dedicated to him. He was born in Canada. Edwin and his brother
were born in the US, the first US born generation in their family. He was drafted into World War II
during law school where his job involved diplomatic relations overseas. He went on to serve as an
attorney in the military, retiring after more than 20 years and was an attorney for Muskogee County
for over 50 years. He died in 2003.
Touchette–
Originally from France, now called "Cajun", in Louisiana. Some branches of this line can be traced
into the 1700's. In the 1800's, some family came to the territory that would be later called the
Louisiana Purchase. They were fur trappers, killing and skinning the animals to be sent home to sell.
The French Government saw the many single men over here as a problem because they weren't
getting married and having children;the government collected tax for each citizen, so less citizens
mean less taxes. The government began a program known as the "Casket Girls". Usually, it involved
poor girls. The Government sent each girl to marry a fur trapper. Each girl had a box, or "casket", of
new clothes, a fancy brush, and even work animals like a horse or goats. We are ... Show more
Some members owned vineyards in france near the German Bakers. In the last 150 years, they were
schoolteachers and Baptist ministers. Grace's dad was a circuit preacher. Grace's nephew John
Whisenaunt is a popular basketball coach with wikipedia page about his career. Charles's sister
Mary Alice Ferguson is a semi–retired school teacher In the early 1990's, at a family reunion,
Whisenaunt cousins talked about learning french to visit distant family, but when they arrived, the
family all spoke

The Selfish Act Of Colonialism : A Nascent Of English...
On answering the question, "To what extent is The Tempest "about" nascent English colonial?" I
would say that this Shakespearean play is completely a nascent of English colonialism, because it's
plot is based around colonialism. The story describes white men inhabiting an island and proceed to
fight for control, without any input by the natives. What makes this a story specifically about
nascent English colonialism is the alluding fact that humans are power hungry, which will prove to
be true within the English government when they start to invade other countries. The selfish act of
colonialism is revealed through the characters Prosper, Stephano, and Trinculo. These men's main
focus is to either keep power, or to obtain it. By pay attention to the reactions and interactions with
the natives, the audience can see the role that the natives play in the new neighbors' affairs. It is
clear from their interaction with Caliban that they have no intention to divide and share of power
with any, but themselves. This essay will analyze the interactions between Caliban and his new
neighbors and reveal how their actions are a foreshadow to those of the English colonist. The
character Caliban might seem to be a little peculiar to the audience, they even might come pair him
to an animal. His representation was purposeful done, because his presentation is similar to the way
colonist viewed the natives of the new country. They were not viewed as people, because the
colonist did not deem

Columbus Narrative
It was cold. The room was dim with nothing in it other than a capsule. The capsule looked like a
coffin with a glass door and made of metal. I was laying in the bed. It was cold and sent chills up my
spine. My body was covered in goosebumps. I didn't know if it was because I was cold, or if it was
because I was nervous for what I was about to do. All my training was leading to this moment. This
was my first assignment as a timeshifter. I was part of a program that travels through time to shift it
and make the outcome better. My job was to go back in time when Columbus set sail to discover
America. I would have to gain the trust of the Indians. Before he arrived. That way I would be able
to unite the two of them and prevent that massive death ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME?
"Yes, we speak english".
"Great than we can... wait. Who's we?".
"Me and my people, we live here".
"Can you take us to them?".
"Of course, we are all friendly here". I was doing it I was bringing together the colonists and the
Indians, thus preventing the wars that will follow and saving the tons of lives. The bond between the
two allowed the colonists to survive the first winter, and create a brotherhood between the

2. Analyze the Ways in Which British Imperial Policies...
2. Analyze the ways in which British imperial policies between 1763 and 1776 intensified colonial
resistance to British rule and their commitment to republican values. As generations grew up in
America, nationalism within the colonies grew towards their new country. These settlers slowly lost
their patriotic tie to Great Britain and it's ruler, King George III. So when the French and Indian War
ended in America, and the indebted England needed some compensation from American settlers in
the form of taxes, the colonists questioned the authority of England and their ability to rule them.
British imperial policies such as the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Townshend Tea Tax caused uproar
within the colonies against British rule without ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Protests in the streets against the British soldiers for this Townshend Tea Tax led to the first
bloodshed early in the Revolution. The "Boston Massacre" was the killing of eleven citizens on the
streets of Boston when a group of sixty colonists led by Crispus Attucks were protesting the new act.
The news of this slaughter was spread throughout the colonies by the Committees of
Correspondence set up by a rich politician named Samuel Adams. These committees made it
possible for information on everything resistance–related to reach all of the colonies in due time. In
this way was news of the Boston Massacre spread across the United States which created outrage
across the country. As tea was shipped to America under the new tea tax, rebellion stirred in Boston.
Colonists disguised themselves and pillaged the trade ships, ruining millions of dollars worth of tea.
In response to this, Parliament passed the 'Intolerable Acts' which outraged the colonists even further
by closing the Boston ports, placing Massachusetts under royal authority, and allowing the Catholic
French to settle along the Ohio River Valley under the new policies. Thus continued Parliament to
colonist battle as the First Continental Congress met to discuss their rights as subjects under the king
and announce the changes they wanted made in the Declaration of Rights which argued that the
natural rights of

Colonial Indian Relations And The Impact On Colonization
COLONIAL–INDIAN RELATIONS AND THE IMPACT ON COLONIZATION Jacquelyn Henry
University of Texas at Arlington HIST 1311–701: History of the United States to 1865 September 6,
2016 When discussing colonization, it is often asserted that European settlers contributed a variety
of foreign changes, both negative and positive, to the local natives. Things such as plants,
domesticated animals, advances in weaponry, European fashion, religion and foreign disease were
just a few of the new concepts introduced to the Indians. It is easy to look at Europeans as vilified
strangers in a new land taking that what does not belong to them, such as land, resources, and at
times, even people. What if we were to look at things from a different perspective? What roles did
the Indians play to impact the creation of the European colonies? Early relations amongst the natives
and settlers exhibited a fluid balance of conflict and cooperation that facilitated, for both parties,
economic opportunities based on trade, safety in the form of treaties and allies, and the potential
gain of power. When establishing colonies, many Europeans did so on the premise that the new
lands would provide a source of economic gain via flourishing crops, gainful resources, or sought
after precious metals, and while this is true on some measures, another important source of revenue
would come in the form of trade amongst the natives. With the influx of colonists came the new
desire for foreign goods. The

Compare And Contrast Virginia And New England Colonies
In the New World, various resources, climates, and considerable amounts of land allowed numerous
opportunities for settlers. Those who once yearned to climb the social ladder or gain the freedoms
bestowed from land ownership flocked toward the newfound settlements. Colonization proved to be
a grueling task; however, success was found after adapting to the new environment and facing many
hardships. Two colonies established early in the seventeenth century included Virginia and New
England. Both Virginia and New England were forerunning settlements that differed in the
following senses: political, social, and economical. Politically, Virginia and New England differed in
the basis of their governing systems. Virginia focused on the desire of its individuals: "(t)hat our
governors by reason of the corruption of those times they lived in, laid the foundation of our wealth
and industry on the vices of men." This standard of government was an early precursor to
democracy and allowed Virginian's to feel the rights of being freemen. New England, instead of
basing their government on the individual desires of man, governed the colony on the basis of
Christianity. The New England settlers strongly believed the spirit of God would deliver them and
create greatness in the colony: "the God of Israel is among us, and ten of us shall be able to resist a
thousand of our enemies. The Lord will make our name a praise and glory." The colony wanted to
be set above the rest, or in other words,

A Stamp Of Disapproval By David Saxon
A Stamp of Disapproval Written By: David Saxon "No taxation without representation" is being
chanted through the colonies as of late, the Parliament of Great Britain has fed more fuel to the fire
of the colonists, The Stamp acts have been introduced and many colonists do not agree. Now that
the Seven Years' War is over the Royal Crown is in debt. After the war Prime Minister, John Stuart,
3rd Earl of Bute, decided to keep 10,000 British Soldiers in the colonies which would cost £225,000
a year. One of the reasons of why the Prime Minister would do this is that demobilizing the troops
would put 1,500 soldiers out of a job, it is believed some of these soldiers have ties into parliament.
The national debt went from £72,289,673 in 1756 to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Protests were breaking out in the streets of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New York. We don't
know what the future holds but we do know that the colonists are growing impatient and unhappy. I
can assure you this, more violence and protest will come. A Bloody Massacre in the Streets of
Boston Written by: David Saxon More death, murder, and violence have hit the streets of the
colonies. British soldiers shot and killed a mob attacking them. This has only caused more unrest in
the colonies and the tension between the American Colonist and the British is at an all–time high.
Boston has been the center of many acts of resistance to the taxation acts. In 1768, the Townshend
Acts were unveiled and were met with immediate protests stating that it was against the colonist
constitutional rights. This led the Massachusetts House of Representatives to fight the Townshend
Acts. They sent a petition to King George III asking to remove the acts. They also sent a letter to
other colonial representative assemblies, asking them to help them and join the protests, and called
for a boycott of imported goods. On the night of March 5, 1770, Hugh White, a British soldier, was
standing guard outside the Custom house on King Street, today

Explain Why Early Jamestown Why Did So Many Colonists Die
Early James Town: Why did so many colonists die?
These colonists died months after settlement. Why did they meet there death so early? The Colonists
came for one reason. Or at least most of them. Gold, Silver and riches. So many colonists died at
Jamestown in the beginning because of lack of commit, native American attacks and poor
environment conditions.
These people who the Virginia company sent to the "New World" They thought they were skilled
and prepared to survive on this new land of mystery. But this wasn't the case. They were hiding a
secret. They had no skills or plans to live and thrive on this new world. See, The "settlers" want to
get gold and 'hit it rich' (Doc D). But that wasn't the worst part. When they went to the bathroom? In
the water? But why is this important? Because they had to drink water? And the water was right
there. (Doc A) They had the right idea. The water was on a current and they thought that when they
use the bathroom it will go down stream. But when a stream connects to a larger body of water, so
the exact water flushing into the stream ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There was so much drought that personally I'm surprised that they survived on such little water.
They would go without water for more then 10 days. That's a long time! This means that the
Jamestown Colonists were dying off. There dying off, so what about the other animals? These
animals were dying too. This means that the Jamestown Colonists were losing food. This follows the
old saying "Desperate times call for desperate measures." So with that being said. They would eat
there horses, dogs, cats.... And even. Each other! That's right, cannibalism.
With these three reasons said, and detail explain put into them, you must understand now why
Jamestown Colonists died so early. The Drought, the fact of even caring, or even the Indians
attacking out of sheer fear that we might overthrow them? This is why early Jamestown Colonists
died so

Why Was Giovanni Da Verrazano's Voyage Important?
1. Why is it important to begin the "historic" (as opposed to prehistoric) period of Maine history in
Europe?
It is important to being the "historic period of Maine history in Europe for a number of reasons. One
very important reason was because during that time period European events dominated Maine.
Those events proved that historic change in regional cultures usually came from an outside group.
The European explorers saw Maine as a place with so many possibilities, but along with these
explorers also came conflict. Land claims started wars between many different cultures, and theses
wars are what helped shape the history of Maine.
2. Did the Norse discover Maine?
As of right now it is strongly believed that the Norse did not discover Maine. There is actually no
hard evidence or specific geographic reference points that prove that they had ever visited Maine at
all. There was at one point a Norse penny that was found in Maine but it is believed to have come
from Northern Indians who brought it with them when they traveled south to Maine.
3. Why was Giovanni da Verrazano's voyage important? Describe his path of exploration.
Giovanni da Verrazano's voyage began in 1524, he and his crew landed somewhere in South
Carolina where they then traveled north and ended up on Maine's coast around May. ... Show more
This Myth began circling around Europe during the sixteenth century and got a lot of explorers
interested in the North. Norumbega was actually the reason why Bartholomew Gosnold was sent to
explore the north. Despite not actually finding the promise lands that were talked about he was able
to return with cargo and reports of the new land that peaked even more of an interest in the north.
Gosnold's explorations was the first report of the excellent fishing on the New England coast. That
report was very important for the future of not only Maine but all of New

Analysis Of Home Life In Colonial Days
The colonization in the new continent took place in the sixteenth century after many failed attempts.
It is thanks to the first European settlers that the United States of America was later formed. As
colonizers left their homelands and traveled across the Atlantic ocean in hopes of finding fortune
and a better life, they were faced with the opposite. Although after some time they soon started
considering the New World and the colonies formed as their new homes. In spite of the first
travellers to arrive being simply men, women started arriving slowly to the new discovered land as
Tobacco Wives. They were sent so the settlers could start families and procreate. As time progressed
more and more families of different social statues and religious groups arrived to the unknown land.
The history behind the colonization is very known although many times the acute details of the
home life are not spoken of. Thanks to the book Home Life in Colonial Days written by Alice Morse
Earle, one becomes aware of the settlers day–to–day life.
In the book, Alice Morse Earle writes about all characteristics in regards to the life of the colonist in
the new land. Every part of the life of colonists including the struggles they faced, type of homes
that were built, how they looked inside and the way individuals ate and served the food are
mentioned as well as the occupation each member of the household had and the popular fashion
attire at the time. In addition she too spoke of Sacred–Sundays

The Revolution For Independence From England
Many colonist were against the revolution for independence from England for many different
reasons. Some reasons were that the colonies were too commercially dependent on England, that
they had superior numbers and they also had a stronger navy against the colonies, and that the
existing political system would breakdown and all of this would leave America prey to attacks from
other foreign countries. Tomas Paine thought differently on the results of the revolution. His answers
to the counter these arguments made by the colonist that were against the revolution was that, being
commercially dependent on England, America will go to ruins, America does not need more people
to fight but that the colonies need to band together and for England's navy, not all of her ships are in
use or ready to be in use and America can also build her own navy comparable in size. Lastly, Paine
suggest that the colonies should adopt a representative democracy, which will give equal
representation to all colonies. Firstly, Paine argued that if America was to stay connected to
England, she will not thrive, her trade will be ruined because America will become involved with
wars and fighting between England and other parts of Europe. " ... Because, any submission to, or
dependence on Great Britain, tends directly involve this continent in European wars and quarrels..."
(Paine, 86). This will tend to leave other foreign countries not wanting to trade with America. Paine
say that America's commerce will be

Jamestown Vs Chesapeake Essay
Chesapeake is similar to Jamestown, in a few ways– both had many changes in political systems,
grew tobacco as a cash crop, used slaves, and were Christian. They were also different, of course, as
the political systems they each went through were not the same, Jamestown traded with the natives
throughout its lifetime (while the Chesapeake only did initially), they had different denominations of
Christianity, and different physical settlements. With many similarities these two colonies were alike
overall. However, their smaller differences set them apart in a variety of ways.
Both colonies changed political systems and powers throughout their lifetimes– sometimes the
change was necessary, other times it was for the benefit of those in power, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, they were different denominations of Christianity, partial thanks to the different political
systems. From the beginning of the Chesapeake colony, the colonists were a mix of Protestants and
Catholics, as the colony was a proprietorship, not a royal colony. With its growth, the number of
Protestants rose, even though Lord Baltimore would've like a completely Catholic colony. The route
he chose to protect the minority Catholics was to allow anyone to practice their religion, so long as
they believed in Jesus. This is similar to values in America today– though it was more restricted in
Chesapeake at the time, it was one of the colonies that started the idea of religious freedom.
Jamestown was comprised of settlers of the Anglican faith, the official religion of the English at the
time. This was most likely due to it being a royal colony, and one of the first ones at that– so the
people chosen to become colonists were faithful representatives of the country. Their physical
settlements were also different– Jamestown was a small village surrounded by a wall. This type of
settlement was used because they didn't know what to expect and protect themselves from, and
didn't think they needed to farm for their survival (expecting to trade with the natives). Chesapeake
quickly developed into a rural colony, though, with farms spread far apart from one another. Using
farming as a large food and profit source, they grew foods like corn and

Similarities Between Globalization And The 19th Century...
Colonialism, the policy and practice of a power in extending control over weaker peoples or areas,
was very prevalent in nineteenth century and promoted the connection of different parts of the
world. Likewise, globalization also connects and integrates different parts of the world, but it is
somehow differentiated from colonialism. The essay mainly talks about some differences and
similarities between 19th century colonialism and 21st century globalization by examining war and
conquest versus peace, violent revolutions versus trade and how both demonstrate trends of
interconnection.
First of all, colonialism in 19th century involved occupation and slavery, while globalization
promoted integration and peace. In nineteenth century, Britain colonized ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Both colonialism and globalization improve the interconnection and development of countries in
spite of the inequality caused by them. Because of the British colonists in Africa, the incomes of
most African countries increased steadily during this period, from the year of 1885 (Robinson, J. and
Heldring, L. 2013). There was certain statistics showing the development of countries that were
colonized, but experts pointed out that harm triggered by colonialism should never be ignored.
Besides, the colonialism in 19th century promotes the interconnection between colonists and
colonies because colonies were ruled by colonists, so they had the same laws, regulations, culture,
and economic system. In East – Africa, the British protectorate had influenced effectively. The
railway, hospitals, schools, and telegraph appeared in East – Africa, and new food like maize and
sweet potatoes made Africans diet more nourishing (Rashid, N. 2014). The most significant
development of globalization is technology. Advanced technologies provide us more open source
materials, more efficient way of health care, more accessible education materials, and a free area to
communicate with people in different countries. The Internet Revolution and Web 2.0 have
improved the social networking and communication (Hrynyshyn, D. 2002). Because of the
development of technology, every country in this

The Origin Of The Land
Enticingly, the Spanish colonists came to this land with a passionate goal to develop the land and
extract its natural resources for their profit. To this day, the Spanish's action on this land has brought
prosperity and has propagated California to be the leading roles in the innovation of new
technologies and the production of movies. Despite of having this reputation, people seldom discuss
on the origin of the land. When the Spanish came, the Indian are the inhabitants of the land; ruling
the land and surviving with all the natural resource. As history is depicted by the victor, the fate of
the right owner of the land has always been untold. Their once peaceful time had ceased to continue
as the Spanish colonized and stole the land from the Indian. Trickeries and militaries were used by
the colonists to exploit the land for their benefits. The Indian population begin to decline as the
newcomers were "[gobbling] up native foods and undermined the free or "gentile" tribes efforts to
remain economically independent" and the outbreak epidemic of "European diseases" had declined
"60% of the population of mission Indians (Castillo). To not disremember the suffering of their
people, poems like Indian Cartography by Deborah Miranda and Itch Like Crazy: Resistance by
Wendy Rose are composed to capture their heart–breaking moments and to disclose their suffering
to the world, but both poems have a different goals: Indian Cartography emphasizes on sympathy;
while Itch Like Crazy

The Prairies Essay example
The term romantic is defined as "literature depicting emotional matter in an imaginative form"
(Morner). Romanticism was a cultural movement in the eighteenth century that had an impact on in
many areas including music, art, and literature. The movement that Romanticism put forth was so
powerful that today, scholars refer to it as a revolution that took place in rebellion against the austere
views of groups like the Puritans from the previous centuries. Many images of nature in the writing
at this time, as well as writers, encompass sympathetic interests in the past. One particular piece,
William Cullen Bryant's "The Prairies" captures an strong sympathetic look to the past.
In his poem "The Prairies", William Cullen Bryant's exhibits a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Bryant shows his appreciation for those who come before in saying, "Man's better nature triumphed
then." (L 79) After continual expansion of the American colonies, many Indian tribes were forced to
leave their native land and move westward. Bryant explains that this had a major impact on the
mound people, "The red man came/ The roaming hunter tribes, warlike and fierce, / And the
mound–builders vanished from the earth" (L 58–61). Then Bryant becomes extremely
compassionate for the vanquished "mound people" when he says, "All—save the piles of earth that
hold their bones––/ The platforms where they worshipped unknown gods––/ The barriers which they
builded from the soil/ To keep the foe at bay—till o'er the walls/ The wild beleaguerers broke, and
one by one, / The strong holds of the plain were forced, and heaped/ With corpses" (L 64–71). After
taking over the prairies form the mound people, the Indians then lived peacefully until they again
come in contact with the colonists. The colonist way on life is what again forces the Indians to leave
because all of the bison had been killed. Later in the poem Bryant then shows sympathetic feelings
toward the Indians after their way of life was changed by the colonists when he states, "The white
man's face—among Missouri's springs,/ And pools whose issues swell the Oregan,/ He rears his little
Venice. In the plains/ The bison feeds no more" (L 95–98). William Cullen Bryant

Motivation In The Chesapeake Colonies
Motivation was the greatest determining factor behind the radically different societies being planted
in the Chesapeake, West Indies, and New England colonies. The force that drives a man is the desire
of that man's heart. Whether in search of riches or fame, adventure or an escape from tyranny, the
spirit of man is determined to seek its heart's desire at any cost. Greed is the inordinate desire to
acquire or possess far beyond the dictates of basic survival and comfort, including but not limited to
an insatiable drive to gain wealth, goods, objects of abstract value, and to obtain status, and power.
The Chesapeake Colony began as a private venture, financed by the Virginia Company, located in
London. This was a group of wealthy investors, whose only objectives were to increase their wealth,
and to expand England's holding around the world. These investors expected to find gold and silver,
a passage to Asia for a simpler trade route, and possible valuable products for trade or sale in
Europe. In 1607, under King James I, the Virginia Company was granted a charter, giving the
company the right to settle anywhere from roughly present–day North Carolina to New York state.
Aristocrats and gentlemen, seeking their fortune, embarked on the adventure of their lifetime. They
reached Chesapeake Bay on April 26, 1607, and named their settlement, Jamestown in honor of the
King. Ill–equipped for the intense labor and harsh conditions that lay ahead, for many of them, this

The Pros And Cons Of Slavery In British New York
Slavery in New York under the English rule, compared to the Dutch, was different in the way that
slaves were tolerated, treated and had the ability to be free. The Dutch had a fairer attitude and were
open to helping the slaves find their freedom. On the other hand, when the English took over New
York, their guidelines for the slaves dehumanized them and put legal restrictions around them.
Under the British rule, slaves were treated harshly and weren't allowed to integrate with the other
colonists, compared to the Dutch who were more tolerant and allowed the slaves to have some legal
rights.
The British came up with many laws that restricted and oppressed the slaves for their benefit, some
of these laws included, that slaves couldn't own land, couldn't leave their masters' houses, and
couldn't gather in a group of more than 3, and if they did, they would be abused, killed or have their
limbs cut off. However, the most important law that essentially ended freeing enslaved people was
this, "no enslaved person could be freed without the master paying a £200 bond and promising to
pay the enslaved person £20 a year for life," (UNIT THREE: NEW YORK Resource 21: Laws
Affecting Black Colonials in British New York). This basically assured that the slave's freedom was
determined by the master, which practically made it impossible. According to, Looking at Slavery in
New York, Table 3, New York under the English was the third largest slaveholding colony,
containing 16% of all the

Georgia Dbq Research Paper
The Charter of Georgia was made so that the new colonists who were looking for a fresh start could
have one. However, this was not accomplished. Many people either died or went back to England or
another colony, England and the Spanish were fighting over borders, and the advertising for the new
colony was too exaggerated. The colonization of Georgia, was thus, a failure.
The original colonists of Georgia were trying very hard to live a good life. By the year 1942, which
was 10 years after the first colonists of Georgia came to the New World, nineteen out of the thirty–
one colonists either fled the colony back to England, or died. That was already sixty–one percent of
the population that disappeared (Document A). By 1954, which was twenty–two

Factors And Consequences Of The Sons Of Independence
1) Starting with the period of salutary neglect, Parliament set up the colonies to want independence.
By giving them the freedom to do as they pleased without consequences, as long as they were
making money, allowed the colonists to leave how to live as they wanted. Then, when they needed
the colonies to pay the same taxes as everyone else by passing the Stamp Act, the colonists didn't
want to pay it because they were used to making their own laws. Parliament went from imposing
very little regulations on the colonists to trying to control their taxes and that was never going to go
well for them. They had an agreement with the colonists that they would let them be as long as they
were making money and breaking that all at once had a bit ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The Sons of Liberty did not want pay taxes enacted by Britain and did not want to make any
concessions to Britain. They wanted to live in salutary neglect and nothing else would do. When
Britain started to pass laws such as the Stamp Act the Sons of Liberty resisted and made a case for
their beliefs. They opposed the act event thought they were British Citizens and probably should
have been paying the same taxes as everyone else. Next, when Parliament tried to change their
actions to align with their argument by passing the Townshend Duties, the Sons changed their
argument and resisted the new duties. This created more pressure on Parliament and made them feel
they needed to take stronger actions against the colonies. From this resistance, we get the Coercive
Acts and a stronger British presence in the colonies that lead to an escalating of issues. If the
colonies had accepted that to enjoy the benefits of being a British citizen, they also had to pay taxes
like every other citizen, there would not have been so much tension. The Sons were completely
unwilling to make any concessions to the government of Parliament and that played a huge role in
the situations moving out of

Looking Out for Number One T.H. Breen
Bri Swartley
An Analysis of Looking Out for Number One:
Conflicting Cultural Values in Early Seventeenth–Century Virginia by: T.H. Breen
I believe what Breen is trying to say in his essay is that the Englishmen that came to Virginia were
very different from the settlers of other colonies and they had a much different society develop than
what was typical in the other colonies. They were a highly individualistic society. Breen believes
that the personalities of those who came to Virginia were, in part what caused Virginia 's society to
become so individualistic. Being so individualistic didn 't exactly work out so well for the structure
of society or the well being of the colonists. Breen says that the first people to ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Virginia had a slave population of 187,600 in 1770 (135). This number is more than double that of
any other colony at the time.
4. I do agree with Breen 's point of view and for the most part it agrees with our text. I would
probably be more likely to agree with Breen that the people of Virginia did not form a military band
and fight back against the Indians especially how the text talks about Indians remaining a strong
presence. It wouldn 't make much sense for the Indians to remain a strong presence if they are
constantly being attacked by the settlers. I think the reason that the Indians stayed around is because
Virginia was not effectively fighting them off because they didn 't have any type of formalized
military, or formalized anything for that matter, not even schools.
5. Slavery in New York City, 1731 ALAW For Regulating Negroes and Slaves in the Night Time I
don 't think that this document had too much to do with Breen 's essay Looking Out For Number
One but rather it comes slightly later. I do think that the drastic rise in slave labor shows how
Virginia was willing to exploit people in order to turn a profit and how it would be necessary for
them to enact laws regulating the liberties of slaves to keep them from rising up when the population

Compare And Contrast Jamestown And Chesapeake Colonies
Chesapeake is similar to Jamestown, in a few ways– both of them had many changes in political
systems, grew tobacco as a cash crop, used slaves, and were Christian. They were also different, of
course, as the political systems they each went through were not the same, Jamestown traded with
natives when they were not squabbling, while the Chesapeake only did initially, their denominations
of Christianity were different, and their physical settlements were slightly different as well.
Both colonies changed political systems and powers throughout their lifetimes– sometimes the
change was necessary, other times it was for the benefit of those in power, others due to the protest
of the colonists. Of course, both of these colonies went through different systems as they changed,
being in different situations. Jamestown first was founded with the Virginia Company supporting it,
and having multiple colony leaders in charge of the other colonists. The Virginia Stock Company
was a good idea in theory– many investors would pool their money into the colonies in hope for
profit– however, it eventually failed because it did not make enough profit to sustain itself. Before
this failure, a few new systems were put into place. The colony needed more settlers, so the
company gave anyone who paid for their trip to the colony a grant of land, and anyone having
someone paying their fare would work for them for about four to seven years, the person paying also
gets land for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of the overall concepts are the same, only with smaller differences. They were both Christian,
but with different denominations. They both changed political systems many times, but went
through different governments from the other. Both of them trade with natives, though for a different
duration of time. Their similarites are strong in their economics, though, as they both largely used
tobacco as a cash crop and used slaves as

Autochthony In Leif Enger's Peace Like A River
The story of American Literature, much like the journey of the Land family in Leif Enger's novel,
Peace Like a River, is a story of autochthony. But in both cases, that autochthony is permitted by
some stronger force. America has grown to be a uniquely autochthonous nation as a result of the
profound belief of her people in their exceptional nature. Simultaneously, the influence of other
nations and people is the catalyst for growth in America and American Literature throughout history.
The Colonial period of American Literature is laced strongly with religion and the establishment of
a national history. Both the Puritans and the Pilgrims lived their lives passionately devoted to living
out the Bible as they interpreted it, and found their identity deeply rooted in religion. The Puritans of
the Massachusetts Bay Colony, under the guidance of John Winthrop, were to serve as an example, a
"city on a hill," and all of civilization was to take note. Throughout Peace Like a River, Reuben
Land looks upon Jeremiah's intense faith with the same reverence that Winthrop intended the world
to look upon his civilization with. Reuben, watching his father pace beyond the bounds of the truck
bed, is astonished when he does not fall, but instead continues "walking on the hand of God" (Enger
18). During this moment, Reuben must have felt the same alarm and subsequent astonishment that
those watching Winthrop build his miniature empire felt. Both Winthrop and Jeremiah Land walked

A New World Developed Between The 16th And 18th Century
A new world developed between the 16th and 18th century focused on growing empires
establishments of 'power and profit'. Ogborn argues that through various types of global connections
and the rise and fall of global powers, a global history was created. In particular, the exchange of
goods and services by Britain and the English colonies was only obtainable through utilizing
transportation. As a result, an advantageous Atlantic economy was formed . Britain applied
transportation as a method of ridding the country of undesirables, which included convicts, and
consequently created the criminal transportation system. Beattie notes that Britain was
simultaneously able to benefit the English colonies, providing the colonists with servants ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As the colonial period prevailed in the 17th century and the settlers continued to create a society in
the new world, suspicion arose towards settlers and natives with distinctly unique life styles. These
"foreigners" were viewed as threatening to the colonists newly established societies. The first
English colonies were religiously intolerable, particularly towards Quakers . The English settlers
also feared the Native Americans because of their foreign way of life and their already established
communities on land settlers sought after . Correspondingly, the colonists began to believe it was
their moral duty to preserve their cultural identity as "Englishmen" . Though the Quakers were a
peaceful religion posing no actual threat, Virginia denounced them as endangering the society's
peace and safety in 1662. As a result, colonial court authorities in Virginia banished Quakers, upon
their third offense, when found practicing their religion . The Native Americans, on the other hand,
did actually pose a dangerous threat to the colonists in the early 17th century. The first Indian
uprising occurred in 1622 and became known as the Virginia Massacre. This event occurred because
of the Native Americans' fear of losing their land to settlers . Anti–Indian sentiment was soon after
instilled into English colonists. Colonial authorities and settlers began to adopt the view that it was
their duty

Examples Of Colonialism In Heart Of Darkness
Does Heart of Darkness criticize or accept colonialism? Colonialism is one of the important aspects
of Joseph Conrad's story Heart of Darkness. By the language and words J. Conrad is using we can
see that he does not support colonialism. His work is not a critique of European colonialism, but he
more criticizes it rather than accept it. Colonialism was accepted matter at that time, and nobody
questioned it actually as much as J. Conrad did through his novel for which he himself was
criticized more. Many European countries in the end of the nineteenth century had imperialistic
goals of exploring and settling Africa. Also, they believed that it had little of the settled land, and it
was populated by uneducated and ''uncivilized'' African cultures. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Conrad does not accept colonialism. ''Mind, none of us would feel exactly like this. What saves us is
efficiency–the devotion to efficiency. But these chaps were not much account, really. They were no
colonists; their administration was merely a squeeze, and nothing more, I suspect. They were
conquerors, and for that you want only brute force–nothing to boast of, when you have it, since your
strength is just an accident arising from the weakness of others. They grabbed what they could get
for the sake of what was to be got. It was just robbery with violence, aggravated murder on a great
scale, and men going at it blind–as is very proper for those who tackle a darkness. The conquest of
the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or
slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much. What
redeems it's the idea only. An idea at the back of it; not a sentimental pretence but an idea; and an
unselfish belief in the idea–something you can set up, and bow down before, and offer a sacrifice
to..,'' he

The Importance Of Slavery In The Colonial Period?
Slavery was and is immoral and more often than not, inhumane. However, slavery was important
because of the increasing demand of cash crops in the south which caused a demand for workforce,
and because of the belief of it being socially acceptable to own another human being. Therefore,
slavery was important to the culture and economy of the colonial era.
When John Rolfe helped Jamestown discover that tobacco was a huge crop that they could easily
grow in their environment and bring in large amounts of profit from the selling and production of it,
they very quickly became a self proclaimed colony. They expanded so quickly because of the ability
to provide for themselves and allow new/more people to come over from England and live in the
colony. Other colonies followed the footsteps that Jamestown took and also became successful after
learning that tobacco was a crop they could grow in their climate, region, and even soil getting tons
of profit off of. The main "crop growing" colonies were in the southern part of the colonized country
above Spanish Florida. Even Georgia, being a buffer colony, was able to grow crops and own slaves
because they had to provide for themselves. The biggest being Jamestown. The colonies thrived on
the cash crops of corn, wheat, oats, cotton, and especially sugar; they are what brought in money
and food to provide for the colonists. Eventually, the colonies grew the crops so well, and the
demand was so high that the colonies had a demand for h more

The Townshend Act Dbq
Arrogance and greed often blind the human eye. In the case of Britain, it blinded the king's eyes,
causing chaos within the incipient American colonies and driving the colonists into furor. Prior to
that, the colonies had enjoyed a certain level of self government ever since the Parliament passed the
salutary neglect. However, the king derailed the system of equality and made the American people
pay most of Britain's debt from the Seven Year War. Soon, the colonies revolted and the king took
back his excessive taxations such as the Stamp Act. Nonetheless, the king once again tested the
patience of his subjects and issued another act, the Townshend Act. This led to outrage among the
colonists. These events led to innocent deaths and the meeting ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Each side, one being the Loyalists and the other being the Patriots had irreconcilable differences.
After the Boston Massacre, surveillance and tightened security ensued. To preserve the spirits of the
colonist and regain hope, members of the Sons of Liberty, including Samuel Adams himself, raided
the ships attired as Mohawk Indians, dumped a number of 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbour.
Because the king renege on "asserting laws that bind the colonies in whatsoever," the colonies had a
legitimate reason to revolt against Britain. ("Declaratory Act" Document 7) Britain has not fulfilled
their duty in providing the colonies with "life, liberty, and property," and in contrast the government
was starting to conform into an absolute one. ("John Locke's Social Contract" Document

Jamestown Vs Plymouth Plantation Essay
The Jamestown and Plymouth Plantation were big acts to our history today. Both plantations were
similar and different in many ways. Jamestown was uniquely harsh, and I could somewhat say the
same about the Plymouth plantation as well. In a matter of fact, the Jamestown and Plymouth
plantation caused a ruckus in their towns/state, enough ruckus to maintain it's name and strength of
time. Starting with Jamestown, it was a scarce plantation. Sailors got what they called "better paid"
due to the ships staying for a longer. They weren't paid in money, but they were paid with bread,
which was a good item to sell, barter, and love etc. There was something established called the
surprise attack. This attack included Smith unexpectedly returning, the Spaniard greedily desiring
gold, and Smith gets shot in the thigh. Jamestown's plantation was violent, and deceiving. Leading
to the Plymouth Plantation, although the ships were very compact, they had an abundance of things
accomplished. There were a lot of sicknesses and cursing. They were very religious with their
beliefs. For example, they were against cursing, indecisive manners and such. Their sails were very
calm and undergoing, yet they ship wasn't that sturdy. There were some rough ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
All jamestown wanted was money, and get rich. Plymouth wanted freedom and religion rights. The
Jamestown's plantation, everyone was for themselves, and didn't help each other out, but the
Plymouth Plantation in other terms were extremely greedy with no doubt and helped others through
tough times. The leaders from both sides, helped their plantation go through majority's failure, but
jamestown's leader, Smith left the colony and never returned, while Plymouth's leader, Bradford
stayed his entire live standing by his pride. Both plantations had a large population, but Jamestown's
was full of men and single affairs, while Plymouth's was full of families and

Analysis Of The Wretched Of The Earth By Frrantz Fanon
Frantz Fanon once said in The Wretched of the Earth, "The colonized underdeveloped man is a
political creature in the most global sense of the term." Frantz Fanon was born in 1925 in
Martinique, a French colony in the Caribbean Sea. He was descended from African slaves who had
previously been brought to the island. Fanon left Martinique at the age of 18 and fought for France
in the last years of World War II. It was during the war that he experienced extensive racism from
his white European peers. This would continue to influence his worldview for the rest of his short
life. Fanon's critical work has established him as an outstanding theoretician of a wide range of
issues, such as identity, nationalism, black consciousness, the role of violence in the struggle for
decolonization, and language as an index of power. His body of work has been influential in fields
like philosophy, politics, psychiatry, cultural studies, and gender studies, as well. Black Skin, White
Masks (written in 1952) and The Wretched of the Earth (written in 1961) two books that state
Fanon'santi–colonial revolutionary thoughts made him an important contributor in the field of
postcolonial studies. He is a controversial image in the field of post–colonialism despite his
contributions in a wide range of fields of study he has been intensively criticized for his abstract
generalizations and his absolutism. Fanon's experience and the general background of that period
justify his bitterness when he talks for

King Jamestown: Pocahontas Interactions With The Indians
During his term as president he led the colony in a productive manner. He actively traded with the
Indian tribes and even held military exercise training for the colonists. Smith made sure that the
people of Jamestown became productive members of the community by having a "no work, no
food" policy. In contrast to other settlers he tried to keep peaceful interactions with the Indians. After
leaving Jamestown in 1609 for Europe, he returned in 1614 to the new world to explore an area he
later named New England. After escaping from pirates and returning to Europe he planned one last
trip to the New World but never made it.
Another important person from this time period was Pocahontas born in 1596 to Chief Powhatan,
leader of the Powhatan Empire.

Common Sense Essay
Common Sense
The persuasion towards independence represented through the pamphlet Common Sense, is largely
effective. The work portrays the unjust treatment received by the colonies from the mother country,
England. Thomas Paine begins with the creation of government, as lived by the colonist, and
progresses to the wrongful acts administered by Parliament and the King of England. Finally,
Thomas Paine gives confidence to the unity of the colonies, and details a forceful removal of
English authority. The argument is set up extensively in the commencement of the pamphlet.
Thomas Paine explains how the colonies began governing themselves. The natural governing
solution for the people of the new world was a representative ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The King, as well as England, begins to forget the colonies are inhabited by English men. The
colonists are consistently being stuck with wrongful governing and no election power. "In America
THE LAW IS KING", but under England the colonies must respect the "King as law" (98).
Unfortunately, the similarities between the two are observed by Thomas Paine as few and far
between.
Common Sense ventures towards the argument about the peace at mind and military protection
provided by the mother country. England gives excuses for the taxes and rulings because of the
safety factor they preserve for the colonies. Paine handles this argument by describing the time it
would take to produce English armed services on American soil. The lapse would be crucial, and
possibly too late. Common Sense portrays some beliefs: "We have boasted the protection of Great–
Britain, without considering, that her motive was interest not attachment; that she did not protest us
from our enemies on our account, but from her enemies on her own account, from those who had no
quarrel with us on any other account, and who will always be our enemies on the same account."
(84) England is protecting the colonies when it is convenient for Her. Paine goes on to point out the
convenience presence when it comes to governing and taxing the colonies.
Thus Paine expresses a need for a

How Did The Americans Take Taxes After The Revolutionary War
The American colonist and the British started out having a very civil relationship. They provided
each other with resources. During the French and Indian war the colonists were on the British side
and helped them fight. Unfortunately, after the war the British started to change their ways and
started to come up with new stricter rules. The British started to tax the colonist on different kinds of
items, which was not fair to the colonists. They were controlling the colonist with everything they
did. The colonists wanted them to back off a little but the British weren't budging. They thought they
could tell the colonists what to do but the colonists were not going to be treated that way, so they
took matters in their own hands. The colonists ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The colonists did not mind the taxes as much because some of the items that were taxed were
unnecessary, however they did mind that the British were using their power as an excuse to tax the
people for no reason (controlling them). The people's money was not used in a useful matter, it was
used for nothing, just extra money for the British to have. "The raising of revenue... was never
intended... Never did the British parliament, (until the passing of the Stamp act) think of imposing
duties in America for the purpose of raising a revenue. The Townshend Acts claim the authority to
impose duties on these colonies, not for the regulation of trade... but for the single purpose of
levying money upson us." (Document 2). The British just decided one day to just tax the colonies
for no reason and the people had no say in it. Also, the British soldiers would come to Boston and
take the Boston colonists jobs. Men and women would lose their jobs because the British would take
it away from them, they were stealing people's jobs. The British were taking their money and now
their jobs after all the colonists did for them in the French and Indian war. That is not fair for them
to run the people like that and it had to be

Compare And Contrast Africa And American Colonialism
Unfortunately, Africa and American both experienced colonialism a long time ago. Colonialism,
after all, is a political system in which an external nation takes complete control of a territory in
another area of the world. Moreover, the colonized people do not invite the colonial power, nor do
they have any say in how they are governed. Colonialism is by definition and practiced un–
democratic! The displeasure experience brings them a lot of similarities, and the same time, it brings
them some differences as well. Africa and America have the similarities on what the invaders
wanted from them–their natural resources. Colonial regimes concentrated on finding and exploiting
the most profitable natural resources in each colony of Africa. In mineral–rich colonies, the
emphasis was placed on mining. In other territories, the colonial power identified agricultural
products suitable for export to Europe. The prominence in either case, was on developing the
resources for export, not for local use or consumption. Profits from the export of mineral and
agricultural goods were also sent to Europe. Profits that could have been used to promote social and
economic development in the colonies were not available. The small taxes levied on exports went to
support colonial rule. For America, European imported the squashes, pumpkins, and corn etc. so that
their health standard grew higher. The Europeans also loved fur, so beaver pelts were one of the
exchange items as well. And later, the three continents fell into a triangle trade system, which
involved three journeys each with the promise of a large profit and a full cargo. In reality, the
journey was more complicated with ships travelling from all over Europe carrying manufactured
goods to different ports along the African coast to trade for slaves. The ships from Africa then sailed
across the Atlantic to the Caribbean and Americas to trade the slaves for raw materials. Finally, the
ships from America returned to Europe with raw materials such as sugar, tobacco, rice and cotton.
Africa and America are different in the way that the colonialism developed. To Europeans, Africa
was more like a method in the trading system. They not only got the natural resources from it, but

Essay about Jamestown
Jamestown: The first English colony In spite of the many Indian massacres, Jamestown still grew to
be a successful colony. The London Company was the main founder of Jamestown. The London
Company's founders believed that there were precious metals in America so they sent a group of
settlers to Jamestown. The trip to the Americas was not a very easy one for these settlers. They had
to overcome many obstacles just to get to the Americas. In 1619 the House of Burgesses was formed
which marked the first legislative body in America. Jamestown was plagued by many disasters.
They were faced with one continuous disaster, Indian wars. They fought over land with Indians for
many years. The London Company, creation of the colony, and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The company then dissolved after King James himself took over the association. The London
Company was not a complete failure because without it their would not have been any money for
the exploration. That was the one of the only major thing that the company did as a whole for the
colony. The creation of Jamestown started on May 24, 1607. Captain Christopher Newport led three
ships, the Susan Constant, Godspeed, and Discovery. "They named both the river and their colony
after King James I of England" (Jamestown 28). They did not want to leave England completely or
they would not have named those two things after him. They probably felt that they needed to name
these things after him because he was the main leader and investor of the expedition. The colonies
agriculture and Industry started off slow. "They failed to produce silk, grapes, and other items
because of the Virginia climate" (Jamestown 29). They had trouble growing these because they
thought that they would grow as they did in England but the climate was much different. They
brought a lot of stuff over that they thought would work but did not and this trial and error resulted
in a long process before they finally found the first product that grew or worked. "The first
agricultural products to be successfully raised were hogs and Indian corn" (Jamestown 29). There
was more than one leader that contributed to keeping Jamestown up and going. Captain

Were the American Colonists Justified in Waging War and...
"Were the American colonists justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain"
The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind, not only justified but also it was about time that
they stood of and actually take action against the British. The choice of going to war with them, was
the only choice that they had. All diplimatical options that they had ceased to stand a chance against
the tyrant Britain. From the very beginning when the colonists felt upset against their mother
country and the way that they went about the law making, up until the beginning of the war, they
tried all diplimatical options that they had, by sending letters, you name it. When they didn't work
then they had no other means but to declare war.
It was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And by doing this, it might be a good idea in the king's eyes, but it's not the best idea in the peoples.
Which is whom you are ultimately trying to please. In the grand scheme of things that is what the
British were missing in their "perfect" colony, pleasing the people. (DCT 2)
The "massacre" that happened on March 5th changed a lot of opinions of the colonist's about how
they felt about the British. The way that the picture was made, in relation to the story was key in
winning the hearts of the Americans. The story told is depicting confusion on the officer's part, and
they randomly fired on the crowd, not in any particular area. The picture shows that the British were
organized, and aimed to kill. Since it is easier to get the story from a picture, the picture was that the
troops have a desire to kill the people, shown with the organization. This picture portrays the British
as murderers, all the more reason to unite and rise against and go to war against. (DCT 3)
The King in his right mind has total control and power of the colonies and can do whatever he
deems necessary to control them. With that said, The king of that time, not thinking about the
peoples feelings went ahead and instead of making the people happy did whatever he could to make
the government better. Which in the long run was to make money. Well every time the king mad a
law to make up for another law that the people didn't like, it

Chesapeake Vs Chesapeake Essay
The colonization of the New World was a trying time for the European powers trying to catch up the
Spanish, such as the British. Sometimes colonies were successful, and sometimes they didn't last
long at all. There were not only the differences in terms of failing or succeeding, but differences in
terms of how the successful colonies succeeded. Two of the most successful colonies were
established and developed in totally different ways. The difference in the successful development of
the colonies in the Chesapeake region was totally different than the successful development of the
colonies in the New England region, and was caused by different populations, climate, geography,
and motivations.
The populations found in New England were far ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They had paid for their own voyage and the sole purpose of their travels was to become rich. Upon
their arrival, they set off in search for a land of gold. During their search, they created heavy
tensions with the natives in the area. This negative relationship with the natives caused them to be
attacked and almost wiped out until the British government took over the region and introduced a
new system. This new system granted 50 acres of land to each person that paid for their voyage, or
another person's voyage over. This caused more families to be drawn to the opportunity and
eventually a greater, smarter, stronger community was established. Overall, there was a far more
immediate success in the establishment of the population in New England than in the Chesapeake
region, which eventually lead to a different feel in society. Additionally, society itself was changing
more and more between the two regions due to the climate.
The climate of the New England region causes the temperature to drop earlier than it does in the
Chesapeake region. The early morning fall frost that falls on the leaves in New England was not
only beautiful but beneficial for their health. In New England the frost came far sooner than in the
Chesapeake region which lead to the death of mosquitos in the frost. Despite their small stature,
mosquitos were actually a large problem in the Chesapeake region. Their feeding on human and
animal blood caused deadly diseases to be

The Half Breed Tract : The Pros And Cons Of Native Americans
The natives crossed the Bering Strait 15,000 years ago from modern–day Siberia to Alaska. There
were 6,000 to 10,000 Natives that crossed the land bridge then settled in North America from
Canada to South America. The natives were living on North America when they saw sails in the
distance. At first they had a peaceful relationship with the colonists then relations got strained. The
North American indigenous tribes faced upheaval when the British colonists arrived in the early
1600's. Due to this coexistence was soon found to be impossible as the interactions between the
colonists and Natives often resulted in enslavement and violence. In order for the British colonies to
maintain this paradigm, the Natives were forced to sign treaties that held provisions such as the Half
Breed Tract. The Half Breed Tract essentially said a piece of land (about 119,000 acres) was being
set aside for mixed marriage families. The families that lived there could not buy or sell the land.
The colonists came looking for a new world when they found the natives. They then decided to
build a colony and settle. Many colonists kept a diary of their travels like John White in 1590. He
kept a diary of his travels.John White originally set out to find precious metals and a northwest
passage to Asia that was sponsored Cathay Company by He tried a few times to establish a colony
that was not abandoned, but he never had a successful colony. He was also a painter, historians study
his paintings and it

Why Was Charles Town Difficult Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tracy Berry

More from Tracy Berry (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Why Was Charles Town Difficult Essay