37. Graphics – a test…
• Less is more 44
• Less is more 36
• Less is more 28
• Less is more 20
• Less is more 14
• Less is more
• Less is more
38.
39.
40. Benefits and harms of testing in the PERC study
Benefits per 10,000 Harms per 10,000
Total events
- Non Fatal 24 (5-48) 37 (10-71)
- Fatal 6 (1-12) 36 (4- 69)
41. Our current model of testing for
suspected pulmonary embolism causes
SIX times as many deaths as lives saved
52. • The only thing less effective than an in-
person "talking head" lecture is a
"talking head" lecture delivered via
videoconference.
• Videoconferencing and CME: "Pearls of Wisdom" Learned From Ten Years of
Experience
By Carol Havens, MD
53. It’s still about the message
Use technology for preparation
Use technology for delivery
Use technology, but not too much
54. Verbal content = 7 %
Vocal interest = 38 %
Body language = 55%
What is your impact on the audience ?
55.
56. Getting your wonderful talk to the
audience?
• USB stick?
• Upload?
• Cloud? E.g. Dropbox, Google drive
• My own laptop?
57. Verbal content = 7 %
Vocal interest = 38 %
Body language = 55%
What is your impact on the audience ?
58. Verbal content = 7 %
Vocal interest = 38 %
Body language = 55%
What is your impact on the audience ?
69. It’s still about the message
Use technology for preparation
Use technology for delivery
Use technology, but not too much
Editor's Notes
Aim small…..
Talk about audience myths
Technology can also identify cheating ! Turnitin….
Technology can also identify cheating ! Turnitin….
Testing for PE in the PERC study caused 36 deaths & 37 nonfatal major medical harms..Did not account for cumulative effects of radiation, anticoagulation continuing for more than 6 months, and accepted fatality rate of 3.8% for PEs missed by testing.