Link here for the Google Slide version that is often updated: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lfwqsbgxQ-6TDkiheTGGExNbOetYKg5MbmHuufXflpE/edit?usp=sharing
This is an updated version of my former thesis statement slideshow. It shows students how to begin developing a thesis statement and what to consider along the way.
ENG 123 Assignment Two, Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Draft O.docxLinaCovington707
ENG 123: Assignment Two, Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Draft Overview: Persuasion is a constant in each and every one of our lives. No matter where we look, what we read, what we see, or who we interact with, we are inevitably going to encounter some form of persuasion. Advertisements want us to buy things. Newspapers and television want to convince us of what we should feel about events. We are put into positions where we must defend our thoughts and beliefs to others, and the process we apply is typically some form of persuasion. Persuasive writing is one of the most powerful forms of writing—it has the ability to influence one's thoughts, and also the ability to change one's mind about a particular issue. The persuasive essay is an ideal opportunity to support an opinion on an issue utilizing researched facts and information. This also gives the chance to recognize that there is an opposing viewpoint to a position and to refute their argument, noting they are the intended audience of the piece. Prompt: For this milestone, you will submit a draft of your persuasive essay. At this point in the course, if you have completed the previous milestone guided activities, the textboxes should be combined and transformed into a draft. This milestone will help you address the critical elements from Sections II - IV below, which will ultimately inform your final submission of the persuasive essay. You have until the deadline to work on this draft. Whatever is completed by the deadline will be submitted to your instructor for grading and feedback. Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Introduction: This is where readers will have a chance to get an idea of what your essay will be about and what you will prove throughout. Do not give all of your information away here, but give readers a sample of what is to come. Do not forget to review your writing plan to make sure you are hitting all of the points that you planned out, while also stating your argument. A. Overview the issue you have selected, briefly describing main points and your argument. B. Compose an engaging thesis that states the argument that you will prove and support throughout your essay. This statement will give direction to your essay and should be well thought out. II. Body: The body is your opportunity to describe and support your argument in depth. Make sure your thoughts and evidence are clear and organized in a way that is easy for readers to follow and understand. A. Be sure that you write multiple paragraphs that are focused, clearly state their intent, and move logically from one to the other, building the thesis argument as the essay progresses. B. Your body paragraphs should support your argument by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence from sources. There is no such thing as a right or wrong argument; the key is how it is supported and the quality of the evidence used. C. Address and refute any opposing viewpoints to your argument. This i.
Final Research Paper Assignment Detailed GuidelinesYou areAlysonDuongtw
Final Research Paper Assignment: Detailed Guidelines
:
You are asked to write a paper of 1700-words (minimum word count—any paper more than 150 words short of this minimum will not be accepted as a complete paper) to 2000-words (maximum word count—you may exceed this without penalty only if it essential to attaining the purpose of your paper). Your paper must cite the work of at least four philosophers studied during the course; there is no upper limit on the number of sources you may use. You have the option of writing a position paper or a comparison essay, depending on whether your plan is to argue in favor of an original position regarding the work and thought of at least four philosophers covered in the course or to comparatively evaluate the work of four or more philosophers. The topics below may be approached using either strategy; you may find that some will better lend themselves to a position paper (also known as an argumentative essay) and some will work better as a comparison essay. Choose the topic that most interests you and the strategy that works best for you.
Topic Areas
1) Plato, Hume, Kant, and Russell: What is human knowledge?
2) Kant, Mill, Aristotle, and Kierkegaard: What is the ethical life?
3) Sartre, James, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche: What is an authentic, autonomous individual?
4) Descartes, Hume, Searle, and James: What is consciousness?
5) Plato, Kant, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche: What is truth?
6) Plato, Descartes, Hume, and Nietzsche: What is the soul or self (conceived as an entity that is purely mental, spiritual, or nonphysical)?
7) Sartre, James, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche: What is the role and value of religious faith?
8) Descartes, Kant, Sartre, and Nietzsche: What is free will and why does it matter?
9) Socrates/Plato, Russell, Sartre, and Nietzsche: What is the role and value of philosophy?
This assignment is broken into two parts:
Part I includes the following elements
:
- Title of the paper (please do not create a separate title page). Special note: DO NOT title your paper, "Final Paper." Your title is important; it should give the reader an immediate snapshot of what the paper will say and attempt to draw the reader in.
- Introductory paragraph (including your thesis). This is a very important part of the paper--it should not be too short or too long (but probably at least five sentences). Begin by introducing the general topic and providing the reader with some rationale for why this topic, and what you will say about it, is worth thinking and reading about. Good writers usually begin with a "hook" in the first line to draw the reader in. You might pose an interesting or intriguing question, bring in an apposite quote, or make a controversial or surprising claim—even one that seems to go against your thesis. You will soon bring the reader around to what your position is when you state your thesis, which is usually very near the end of the first paragraph. The introductory p ...
Notes for Claim Writing Success1. Comments on Titles Sample #.docxcherishwinsland
Notes for Claim Writing Success
1. Comments on Titles:
Sample #1: chose strong language to show writer’s claim; first part grabs attention, second part gets focused
Sample #2: Please Help! Grabs the reader on an emotional level—got attention—the beginning part wasn’t as strong!!
Too fake! Not specific enough—(turned attention away) too blunt! Gives away too much!—
Sample #3: attention grabbing—polarizing language, strong words—can see both sides—
Critique: include “Formation” or not? Too much? Too litte?
Is it too exaggerated? Overly done? Not serious enough?
2. What goes in the first paragraph?
b. what worked?
Introduces the issue
Using some data? Used a quote? Create a sense of urgency or importance=gives justification, gives context
How is this different than Sec 3 (background)?
In claim—give a quick glimpse of the issue—
Sample 3—clear description of problem-
Quote? Expert echoes your statement so it doesn’t sound like you are making it up
Why not use it? Summarize
Sample 1 quote –early? Suspicious
In Sec 3 dig into the details more
c. what didn’t?
what didn’t work
MLA incorrect
Sample #2—too general---too broad!
3. What goes in the second paragraph?
MAP:
All major points of the paper (introduce or touch on every required section)
--Section 2—Suvin and short story
Map out the required sections of this paper (all your big moves!)
--solution (section 6)
Taking a stand –say what you argue and why it matters! Last two sentence of paragraph 2
Use first person? To use or not to use?
Feel more comfortable –easy to use commanding words
Sounding confident
Assert yourself into your argument—easier to sound confident
Map—chronological—follow the order of the paper!!
b. what worked?
c. what didn’t?
this is not project proposal writing
Is it specific? Controversial?
Map? What does that mean??
Stakes?
Final Research PAper
Final Research Paper: What’s the New Cognition? Estrangement in Octavia’s Brood
For your final paper, please select a novum you find cognitively estranging in one short story. Using outside research, write a 6-8 page, double spaced, 1 inch margins, 12pt font, Times New Roman research paper that investigates the new cognition the estrangement leads you to explore. The page requirement does NOT include the Works Cited.
Final version due to Canvas 3/20 before 11:59 pm.
Your bibliography should have at least 10 sources to support your argument and to detail what the new cognition is for you on this particular issue. Darko Suvin’s “Estrangement and Cognition” and the short story of your choice count as two of the ten sources.
At least three of your sources must be from academic, peer-reviewed journals. The other five (min.) can be from popular sources.
You need one quote in every paragraph, Sections 3-6.
Organization, Section I
2 paragraphs that outline the claim, complete with stakes. Recall, strong claims are specific, take a stand on something controversial, and they matter. Your claim should provide a ma.
Article Review -- PAD 530CriteriaLevels of AchievementCont.docxfestockton
Article Review -- PAD 530
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Summary Content
25 to 27 points
· Each paragraph is written using clear and concise language.
· Student thoroughly discusses the important details from the article, demonstrating comprehension.
22.5 to 24.5 points
· Student’s review cogently interacts with the article provided.
· A few details and/or examples are given.
1 to 22 points
The student’s review omits one of the key elements in the article.
0 points
Not present
Key Elements
24 to 26 points
· Student demonstrates understanding of the intent of the article
· Student presents biblical/ethical issues associated with the article.
· Discusses key elements in the review which are related back to the concepts within the course.
21.5 to 23.5 points
Student addresses all elements of the assignment.
1 to 21 points
Student’s summary contains superfluous information that does not reflect the ability to critically "weed-out" trivial content.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
APA
Formatting
9.25 to 10 points
The review meets the length and formatting requirements.
Complete citation is formatted correctly.
Grammar and spelling are correct.
Formatting writing standards are implemented throughout the essay.
8.5 to 9 points
Review does follow length requirements.
Essay meets the majority of formatting guidelines.
.
1 to 8.25 points
Review fall short of meeting length requirements and formatting guidelines.
.
0 points
Not present
10
Grammar and Spelling
11 to 12 points
No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
10 to 10.75 points
Minimal grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
1 to 9.75 points
A few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors
0 points
Not present
12
Instructions:
You will write two article reviews based on a designated article located in the Reading & Study folder of the corresponding module/week. Each review will summarize and critique the author’s position/conclusion in at least 500 words in APA format. Each Article Review is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Saturday of the assigned module/week.
Here are some frequently asked questions concerning Major Writing Project 3. Below are some generic questions with my responses:
1) Question: In the instructions, it states that I need five sources, two of which should be peer-reviewed. How do I include the non-peer-reviewed sources? Answer: While you need five sources total, you might not want to treat all of those sources as your main voices in your argument. Let’s say you have three main voices that you summarize: two peer-reviewed sources and one non-peer-reviewed (see the next question too). These three sources are the main voices in the conversation you’re setting up. The other two sources (or more, if you wish) would just be incorporated as supporting sources for your own argu ...
How to use this template To use this template, replace the inst.docxwellesleyterresa
How to use this template:
To use this template, replace the instructions written in italic font with your own discussion text. Be sure to proofread your work and check it for completeness and accuracy. Delete any extra text/instructions/references that do not apply to your post. Then, copy your work and paste it into the discussion window in class.Week 1, Discussion 1: Initial Post
My personal communication style is…(Here, you should talk about the “reflect” part of the prompt. You can share your personal verbal style, writing style, and any concerns you have about your ability to develop a truly academic argument in this class.)
I have learned that an academic argument is…(Here, you should describe an academic argument in your own words, based upon the items you read in preparation for this discussion. Remember to describe the four basic elements of an argument.)
A recent argument that I experienced was…(Or, if you do not wish to outline an argument from your personal experience, describe the argument presented in the sample paper. Be sure to identify the four basic elements of the argument, whether analyzing one from your experience or the student paper.)
After reading the course materials, I have questions about…(Be sure to clearly state any questions or confusion you have regarding rhetoric, argument, or styles of argument. Your classmates can help you find the answers throughout the week.)
References
(If you reference the textbook, instructor guidance, or handout – which you should – be sure to cite them in-text and add the references to the end of your post. We are learning to master APA style in this class and this is a perfect opportunity to begin your practice. Remember: only items cited in-text should be listed as a reference. For more information: https://awc.ashford.edu/cd-in-text-citation-guide.html & https://awc.ashford.edu/cd-apa-reference-models.html)
Drown, E., & Sole, K. (2013). Writing college research papers (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Flag Burning. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://cdmsmedia.bridgepointeducation.com/MediaService/MediaService.svc/constellation/book/AUWC.12.4/%7Bhandouts%7Da.8_sample_argument_paper.pdf
Garten, A. (n.d.). ENG122 week 1 Instructor guidance [Course materials].
Garten, A., & Wilson, J. (2014). An Introduction to Argument [PDF]. College of Liberal Arts, Ashford University, San Diego, CA.
ENG122: Composition II
An Introduction to Argument
P a g e | 1
English 122: Composition II
An Introduction to Argument
Argument and Rhetoric
An argument can take many forms. An academic argument, at its root, a method for
communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential
elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms.
1. Claim
2. Evidence
3. Counterargument
4. Rebuttal
A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance
between these elements. Imagine a teeter-totter at the
playground. The ...
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2. Examples of Argumentative Language
Below are examples of signposts that are used in argumentative essays. Signposts enable the reader to
follow our arguments easily.
When pointing out opposing arguments (Cons):
Opponents of this idea claim/maintain that…
Those who disagree/ are against these ideas may say/ assert that…
Some people may disagree with this idea,
Some people may say that…however…
When stating specifically why they think like that:
They claim that…since…
Reaching the turning point:
However,
But
On the other hand,
When refuting the opposing idea, we may use the following strategies:
compromise but prove their argument is not powerful enough:
- They have a point in thinking like that.
- To a certain extent they are right.
completely disagree:
- After seeing this evidence, there is no way we can agree with this idea.
say that their argument is irrelevant to the topic:
- Their argument is irrelevant to the topic.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Signposting sentences
What are signposting sentences?
Signposting sentences explain the logic of your argument. They tell the reader what you are going to do at key
points in your assignment. They are most useful when used in the following places:
In the introduction
At the beginning of a paragraph which develops a new idea
At the beginning of a paragraph which expands on a previous idea
At the beginning of a paragraph which offers a contrasting viewpoint
At the end of a paragraph to sum up an idea
In the conclusion
A table of signposting stems: These should be used as a guide and as a way to get you thinking about how
you present the thread of your argument. You may need to adapt certain words and phrases for your own
purposes. You may also wish to add your own sentence stems to the list below:
Signposting stems for an introduction
To understand the role of ... (your topic*) this essay aims to provide a discussion of ... (the ideas you will
develop)
This essay seeks to investigate/evaluate/illustrate/discuss the impact of ... (your topic) in relation to ... (the
ideas you will develop)
Firstly, this assignment examines ... (your topic) and its links with ... (your first idea) Next, it closely examines
... in relation to ... (your next idea) Finally, it focuses on ... and how this affects ...(your next idea)
Signposting stems for a paragraph which introduces or develops a new idea
One aspect which illustrates ... (your topic) can be identified as ... (the idea you want to develop)
The current debate about ... (your topic) identifies an interesting viewpoint on ...(the idea you want to
develop)
This first/next/ final section provides a general discussion of ...(the idea you want to develop)
Signposting stems for a paragraph which expands upon a previous idea
Building on from the idea that ... (mention previous idea), this section illustrates that ... (introduce your new
idea).
To further understand the role of ...(your topic or your previous idea) this section explores the idea that ...
(introduce your new idea)
Another line of thought on ... (your topic or your previous idea) demonstrates that ... (introduce your new
8. idea)
Signposting stems for a paragraph which offers a contrasting view
However, another angle on this debate suggests that ... (introduce your contrasting idea)
In contrast to evidence which presents the view that ... (mention your previous idea) an alternative
perspective illustrates that ... (introduce your contrasting idea)
However, not all research shows that ... (mention your previous idea). Some evidence agrees that ... (introduce
your contrasting idea)
Signposting stems to sum up an idea in a paragraph
This evidence highlights that ... (sum up your idea)
There is general agreement that ... (sum up your idea)
The strength of such an approach is that ...(sum up your idea)
Signposting stems for a conclusion
Clearly, this essay has shown that the main factors which impact upon ... (your topic) are ...(summarise your
main ideas)
The evidence presented in this assignment has shown that ... (mention the conclusions you have drawn)
To conclude, this assignment has addressed a number of significant issues which show that ... (mention the
conclusions you have drawn)
9. Argumentative Essay Outline (Sample)
Introduction
- Thesis statement/claim
- Main points (at least three)
Body Paragraph 1
- Present your first point and supporting evidence
Body Paragraph 2
- Present your second point and supporting evidence
Body paragraph 3
- Present your third point and supporting evidence
- Counterclaim/ refute opposing claim
Conclusion
- Restate your thesis