Sustainable Modifications and Innovations using LEED of a Women University in...Asadullah Malik
We as civil engineers deal with a field which is so diverse in its applications. In this project too we dealt with Environmental, Transportation, Material and other aspects of a project.
The continuous search for more sustainable and economic processed solutions has been an important investigation topic of a broad research community worldwide. The resulting solutions can therefore be adapted by the industry thus leading to a more sustainable society. The building industry is not immune to this reality and huge efforts have been done in order to find alternative sustainable building materials and low technology methods, which result in a more sustainable and affordable construction complemented with the comfort standards required nowadays. The CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, energy and water consumptions are some parameters that have significant impact in this equation. Reusing, opting for green building materials (which must be renewable, local, and abundant), retrofitting, choosing low technology methods and techniques are some practices that have given good results in this context.
The concept of sustainability is not limited to buildings.
As mentioned in the abstract, our LEED Project is situated in Al-Dilam. Below the pictures perfectly depicts the outskirts of this town.
Executive Summary portion of the forthcoming draft Supplemental Environmental Generic Impact Statement from the New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation, released on July 1, 2011.
Environmental issues arise frequently on construction projects in Alberta. These issues can be complex and can result in regulatory investigations, litigation or significant unwanted publicity for project owners. This seminar by the Blakes Environmental Group will provide an overview of this rapidly changing area of the law and a discussion of best practices.
Aaron Zambo is Civil Engineer experienced in civil construction planning, construction management, reservoir construction, landfill design, constructed wetlands, water and sewer utility design,geotechnical and hydrological analysis, design and CQA,watershed management,site development, civil/environmental permitting, and site remediation.
Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Division of Solid Waste Services - Gude Landfill Remediation Project Corrective Measures Implementation - June 2017
This presentation describes the Shreveport Choice Neighborhood Transformation Planning (CNTP) process that merges the discipline of "strategic doing" to guide loosely connected open networks, CRI's relational model for growing caring communities, and negotiating through design to better connect planning and implementation. This connection we call agile planning.
Sustainable Modifications and Innovations using LEED of a Women University in...Asadullah Malik
We as civil engineers deal with a field which is so diverse in its applications. In this project too we dealt with Environmental, Transportation, Material and other aspects of a project.
The continuous search for more sustainable and economic processed solutions has been an important investigation topic of a broad research community worldwide. The resulting solutions can therefore be adapted by the industry thus leading to a more sustainable society. The building industry is not immune to this reality and huge efforts have been done in order to find alternative sustainable building materials and low technology methods, which result in a more sustainable and affordable construction complemented with the comfort standards required nowadays. The CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, energy and water consumptions are some parameters that have significant impact in this equation. Reusing, opting for green building materials (which must be renewable, local, and abundant), retrofitting, choosing low technology methods and techniques are some practices that have given good results in this context.
The concept of sustainability is not limited to buildings.
As mentioned in the abstract, our LEED Project is situated in Al-Dilam. Below the pictures perfectly depicts the outskirts of this town.
Executive Summary portion of the forthcoming draft Supplemental Environmental Generic Impact Statement from the New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation, released on July 1, 2011.
Environmental issues arise frequently on construction projects in Alberta. These issues can be complex and can result in regulatory investigations, litigation or significant unwanted publicity for project owners. This seminar by the Blakes Environmental Group will provide an overview of this rapidly changing area of the law and a discussion of best practices.
Aaron Zambo is Civil Engineer experienced in civil construction planning, construction management, reservoir construction, landfill design, constructed wetlands, water and sewer utility design,geotechnical and hydrological analysis, design and CQA,watershed management,site development, civil/environmental permitting, and site remediation.
Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Division of Solid Waste Services - Gude Landfill Remediation Project Corrective Measures Implementation - June 2017
This presentation describes the Shreveport Choice Neighborhood Transformation Planning (CNTP) process that merges the discipline of "strategic doing" to guide loosely connected open networks, CRI's relational model for growing caring communities, and negotiating through design to better connect planning and implementation. This connection we call agile planning.
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryAshleyTso1
During the Construction in Indian Country 2018 Annual Conference, Eunice Tso led a workshop session on Friday morning called “Environmental Permitting in Indian Country.”
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryAshleyTso1
During the Construction in Indian Country 2018 Annual Conference, Eunice Tso led a workshop session on Friday morning called “Environmental Permitting in Indian Country.”
Phil Jones, PE, OC Public Works Design Division, Bruce Phillips, PE, PACE and Scott Taylor, PE, Michael Baker International present "Engineering Analysis for Urban Drainage Systems" for the Environmental Water Resources Institute of ASCE OC.
More than 25 years of proven environmental consulting leadership through key roles with prominent global EPC companies and through long-term business ownership and operation. Demonstrated versatility leading professional teams on critical and highly visible projects for government agencies (e.g., DOD, EPA, various municipalities) and private sector clients (LADWP, Nextera, Solar Reserve, Aerojet General, Waste Management) – from concept to completion. Diverse background as a hydrogeologist, water resource scientist, solid waste/landfill specialist, and permitting and compliance specialist.
IRJET-Environmental Impact Assessment for Infrastructure Development project...IRJET Journal
M.Manimozhi, A. John Dhanaseely " Environmental Impact Assessment for Infrastructure Development project in Chennai ",International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume2,issue-01 April 2015.e-ISSN:2395-0056, p-ISSN:2395-0072. www.irjet.net .published by Fast Track Publications
Abstract
Environmental impact assessment study for medical and engineering colleges in Chennai- Tamilnadu. Based on the TOR issued by the SEIAA, the Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment Report has been prepared for the Existing and Proposed expansion of Institution, “Deemed University” (Medical College & Hospital Engineering College, College of Engineering & Technology and School of Architecture) at S.Nos. 78/3, 79, 80, 81, 82/1, 82/2, 83/1A, 83/2, 84, 85/2, 86/4B, 88/1, 88/3, 299 of Mevalurkuppam Village and S.Nos. 300, 301, 302, 303/1, 303/2, 303/3, 303/5, 304, 305/3B, 305/3B, 305/4, 306, 308 of Chettipedu Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District by Medical and Educational Trust. Major environmental attributes has considered identifying the Impacts and providing solutions with mitigation measures. Mainly covered Water, noise and solid waste management sector.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a systematic and integrative process for considering possible impacts prior to a decision being taken on whether or not a proposal should be given approval to proceed. (Wood 2003)
Range Resources Voluntary Plan to Close Yeager Wastewater Impoundment in SWPAMarcellus Drilling News
A voluntary plan created and submitted by Range Resources to the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection to permanently close (and restore) the Yeager wastewater impoundment (i.e. open pond) site in Amwell Township, located in Washington County, PA. The plan was tweaked by the DEP to require Range to test for certain compounds underneath the two liners in the impoundment--liners that, according to Range, had holes in both layers.
Understanding community as a complex living adaptive whole system influenced by the nature of the relational foundation from which community emerges as a whole system that is connected (virtuous) or disconnected (vicious)
Intertech Science Park Master Plan overviewKim Mitchell
PowerPoint presentation overview of the Intertech Science Park Master Plan, Shreveport Louisiana, prepared for the Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana (BRF)
willing people relationally filtered through engagement in the CRI model to form a community-wide caring network as the relational foundation of community
This document, prepared by MHSM Architects & Planners, is the zoning ordinance for Bastrop Louisiana. MHSM prepared Bastrop's first ever master land use plan and zoning ordinance and assisted the city in establishing and training its first planning and zoning commission.
Shreveport's Historic Music Village Comprehensive PlanKim Mitchell
This is a 2006 slide presentation of Shreveport's Historic Music Village Plan to the New Media Consortium national conference. The comprehensive plan for the historic area around Shreveport's Municipal Auditorium, Home of the Louisiana Hayride, was recognized by the Louisiana American Planning Association with their Best Plan Award.
This slide presentation was used to present the InterTech Technology Park plan to the Louisiana American Planning Association and to the Association of University Research Parks. The plan received the "Best Plan Award" from the Louisiana APA in 2002.
This presentation was made to the Shreveport City Council in 2007 at the conclusion of the planning process. The framework for the plan is based on the "village structure" eight elements that are part of the Community Renewal International theory of change.
North Shreveport Regional Development Plan - Board PresentationKim Mitchell
This presentation was used in providing board training for the North Shreveport Development Corporation, an organization that was established based on recommendations in the north Shreveport Regional Development Plan
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...Zilliz
This talk will give hands-on advice on building RAG applications with an open-source Milvus database deployed as a docker container. We will also introduce the integration of Milvus with Snowpark Container Services.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Uic Nepa
1. Page 1
NETL F 451.1-1/3
NETL F 451.1-EECBG
(3/2009) OPI=320 = BL40
( 01/2001) OPI U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
(Previous Editions Obsolete)
(Previous Editions Obsolete)
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
I. BACKGROUND
The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021)
require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning
stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an
Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To
comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide
DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review.
II. INSTRUCTIONS
Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate
proposer’s subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent
questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments.
In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable,
regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should
identify the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the
proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project’s statement of work (SOW) or statement of project
objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contract/agreement between the proposer and DOE.
III. QUESTIONNAIRE
A. PROJECT SUMMARY
1. Solicitation/Project Number: DE-FOA-0000013
2. Proposer: City of Shreveport, Louisiana
3. Principal Investigator: Wes Wyche
Telephone Number:
4. Project Title: Shreveport Financial Incentive Programs
5. Duration: 36 months
6. Location(s) of Performance (City/Township, County, State): Shreveport
Caddo Parish
Louisiana
7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c.
Group A-7b
Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This
work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure,
laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test
stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities.
2. Page 2
Group A-7c
Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation,
replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of-ways and roads;
utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel
refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems,
structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and
monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review.
Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe): None
8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this
Environmental Questionnaire. City of Shreveport will develop and use financial incentives to encourage all segments
of the population to engage in energy efficiency improvements. This includes rebating city fees, the establishment of a
revolving loan fund, and the pursuit of Alternative Financing Strategies to create the financing products tha will allow
access to conservation and renewable energy for all of the city’s residences and businesses.
9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be performed by project’s proposer and
subcontractors. None
10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this
project or activity.
11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). To
qualify for financial incentives, the physical location of the project must be within the City of Shreveport.
12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project.
NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and
cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment.
1. Land Use
a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located.
Urban Industrial Commercial Agricultural
Suburban Rural Residential Research Facilities
Forest University Campus Other
b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities.
No construction would be anticipated for this project.
c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project.
No land areas would be affected.
d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, waterfalls, etc.)?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area?
No Yes (describe)
3. Page 3
If project work activities falls under item A-7b; then proceed directly to question B.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air
Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire.
If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question B.2 (Construction Activities and/or
Operations) and continue to fill out questionnaire.
2. Construction Activities and/or Operations
a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark
them on project site maps.
None
b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds?
No Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surface area disturbed)
c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water?
No Yes (describe)
d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion?
No Yes (describe)
3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources
a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project.
None
b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surface waters, or other earth/geologic resource
because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project?
No Yes (describe)
4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions.
a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project?
No Yes (describe)
b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas.?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs.
No Yes (describe)
d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required?
No Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line)
5. Historical/Cultural Resources
4. Page 4
a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included
on the National Register of Historic Places.
None
b. Would construction or operational activities planned under the proposed project disturb any historical, archeological,
or cultural sites?
No planned construction No historic sites Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project interfere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present
landscape?
No Yes (describe)
For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item B6 directly below and
continue filling out environmental questionnaire.
6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality
a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This information is available under the NAAQS tables from the U.S. EPA
Air and Radiation Division.
Attainm ent Non-Attainm ent
O3
SOx
PM10
CO
NO2
Lead
b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants?
No (explain) Yes
d. Would the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Performance Standards?
Not Applicable No (explain) Yes
f. Would the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review?
Not applicable No (explain) Yes (describe)
g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project?
h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used?
No Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies)
i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? No emissions generated
7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water Quality
a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site?
5. Page 5
b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project?
c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project.
City
d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project.
No discharges to local treatment facility
e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated.
N/A
f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites?
No Yes (describe source)
g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to perform project work or site development?
No Yes (describe)
h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged?
No wastewater produced
i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water?
No Yes (describe water use and effluent impact)
j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required?
No Yes (describe)
k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater?
No Yes (describe)
8. Solid and Hazardous Wastes
a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are
defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended
purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). None
b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to perform
project work activities?
No Yes (explain)
c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished?
On-site (identify and describe location)
Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment)
d. How would wastes for disposal be transported?
N/A
e. Describe and estimate the quantity of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored
under this project.
None
f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored?
None used or produced
6. Page 6
g. If hazardous wastes would require off-site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal) facility?
Not required Arrangements not yet made Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility
(identify):
C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE
PROPOSED PROJECT.
None
IV. CERTIFICATION BY PROPOSER
I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately
below.
SIGNATURE: DATE: / /
month day year
TYPED NAME:
TITLE:
ORGANIZATION:
V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been
appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed.
PROJECT MANAGER:
SIGNATURE: DATE: / /
month day year
TYPED NAME:
7. Page 1
NETL F 451.1-1/3
NETL F 451.1-EECBG
(3/2009) OPI=320 = BL40
( 01/2001) OPI U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
(Previous Editions Obsolete)
(Previous Editions Obsolete)
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
I. BACKGROUND
The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021)
require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning
stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an
Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To
comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide
DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review.
II. INSTRUCTIONS
Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate
proposer’s subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent
questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments.
In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable,
regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should
identify the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the
proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project’s statement of work (SOW) or statement of project
objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contract/agreement between the proposer and DOE.
III. QUESTIONNAIRE
A. PROJECT SUMMARY
1. Solicitation/Project Number: DE-FOA-0000013
2. Proposer: City of Shreveport, Louisiana
3. Principal Investigator: Wes Wyche
Telephone Number:
4. Project Title: Shreveport Energy Efficency Retrofits
5. Duration: 36 months
6. Location(s) of Performance (City/Township, County, State): Shreveport
Caddo Parish
Louisiana
7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c.
Group A-7b
Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This
work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure,
laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test
stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities.
8. Page 2
Group A-7c
Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation,
replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of-ways and roads;
utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel
refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems,
structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and
monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review.
Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe): None
8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this
Environmental Questionnaire. Retrofit existing mechanical system on government buildings and residents in the City
of Shreveport
9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be performed by project’s proposer and
subcontractors. none
10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this
project or activity. Replace existing chillers, air handlers, HVAC systems. Discrded materials will be disposed of
properly
11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). The
physical location of each building that will undergo a retrofit wil be determined after the energy audits are
reviewed/completed, but all buildings will be in the City of Shreveport
12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project.
NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and
cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment.
1. Land Use
a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located.
Urban Industrial Commercial Agricultural
Suburban Rural Residential Research Facilities
Forest University Campus Other
b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities.
No construction would be anticipated for this project.
c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project.
No land areas would be affected.
d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, waterfalls, etc.)?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area?
No Yes (describe)
9. Page 3
If project work activities falls under item A-7b; then proceed directly to question B.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air
Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire.
If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question B.2 (Construction Activities and/or
Operations) and continue to fill out questionnaire.
2. Construction Activities and/or Operations
a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark
them on project site maps.
None
b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds?
No Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surface area disturbed)
c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water?
No Yes (describe)
d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion?
No Yes (describe)
3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources
a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project.
None
b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surface waters, or other earth/geologic resource
because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project?
No Yes (describe)
4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions.
a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project?
No Yes (describe)
b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas.?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs.
No Yes (describe)
d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required?
No Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line)
5. Historical/Cultural Resources
10. Page 4
a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included
on the National Register of Historic Places.
None
b. Would construction or operational activities planned under the proposed project disturb any historical, archeological,
or cultural sites?
No planned construction No historic sites Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project interfere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present
landscape?
No Yes (describe)
For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item B6 directly below and
continue filling out environmental questionnaire.
6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality
a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This information is available under the NAAQS tables from the U.S. EPA
Air and Radiation Division.
Attainm ent Non-Attainm ent
O3
SOx
PM10
CO
NO2
Lead
b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants?
No (explain) Yes
d. Would the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Performance Standards?
Not Applicable No (explain) Yes
f. Would the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review?
Not applicable No (explain) Yes (describe)
g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project?
h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used?
No Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies)
i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? As conservation measures, no emissions.
7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water Quality
a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site?
11. Page 5
b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project?
City
c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project.
None
d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project.
No discharges to local treatment facility
e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated.
N/A
f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites?
No Yes (describe source)
g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to perform project work or site development?
No Yes (describe)
h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged?
No wastewater produced
i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water?
No Yes (describe water use and effluent impact)
j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required?
No Yes (describe)
k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater?
No Yes (describe)
8. Solid and Hazardous Wastes
a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are
defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended
purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). Recycled and taken to landfil.
b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to perform
project work activities?
No Yes (explain)
c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished?
On-site (identify and describe location)
Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment)
d. How would wastes for disposal be transported?
Truck
e. Describe and estimate the quantity of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored
under this project.
None
f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored?
None used or produced
12. Page 6
g. If hazardous wastes would require off-site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal) facility?
Not required Arrangements not yet made Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility
(identify):
C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE
PROPOSED PROJECT.
None
IV. CERTIFICATION BY PROPOSER
I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately
below.
SIGNATURE: DATE: / /
month day year
TYPED NAME:
TITLE:
ORGANIZATION:
V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been
appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed.
PROJECT MANAGER:
SIGNATURE: DATE: / /
month day year
TYPED NAME:
13. Page 1
NETL F 451.1-1/3
NETL F 451.1-EECBG
(3/2009) OPI=320 = BL40
( 01/2001) OPI U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
(Previous Editions Obsolete)
(Previous Editions Obsolete)
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
I. BACKGROUND
The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021)
require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning
stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an
Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To
comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide
DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review.
II. INSTRUCTIONS
Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate
proposer’s subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent
questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments.
In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable,
regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should
identify the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the
proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project’s statement of work (SOW) or statement of project
objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contract/agreement between the proposer and DOE.
III. QUESTIONNAIRE
A. PROJECT SUMMARY
1. Solicitation/Project Number: DE-FOA-0000013
2. Proposer: City of Shreveport, Louisiana
3. Principal Investigator: Wes Wyche
Telephone Number:
4. Project Title: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Incubator Program
5. Duration: 36 months
6. Location(s) of Performance (City/Township, County, State): Shreveport
Caddo Parish
Louisiana
7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c.
Group A-7b
Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This
work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure,
laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test
stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities.
14. Page 2
Group A-7c
Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation,
replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of-ways and roads;
utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel
refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems,
structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and
monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review.
Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe): None
8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this
Environmental Questionnaire. The Incubator program will provide support for new and innovative business activities
that posses high probablility of commerical success.
9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be performed by project’s proposer and
subcontractors. None
10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this
project or activity. Incubator operations will be contained within a building. The operation will not generate waste.
11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). The
physical location of the Incubator program will be within the limits of the City of Shreveport.
12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project.
NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and
cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment.
1. Land Use
a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located.
Urban Industrial Commercial Agricultural
Suburban Rural Residential Research Facilities
Forest University Campus Other
b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities.
No construction would be anticipated for this project.
c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project.
No land areas would be affected.
d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, waterfalls, etc.)?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area?
No Yes (describe)
15. Page 3
If project work activities falls under item A-7b; then proceed directly to question B.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air
Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire.
If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question B.2 (Construction Activities and/or
Operations) and continue to fill out questionnaire.
2. Construction Activities and/or Operations
a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark
them on project site maps.
None
b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds?
No Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surface area disturbed)
c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water?
No Yes (describe)
d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion?
No Yes (describe)
3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources
a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project.
None
b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surface waters, or other earth/geologic resource
because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project?
No Yes (describe)
4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions.
a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project?
No Yes (describe)
b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas.?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs.
No Yes (describe)
d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required?
No Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line)
5. Historical/Cultural Resources
a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included
on the National Register of Historic Places.
None
16. Page 4
b. Would construction or operational activities planned under the proposed project disturb any historical, archeological,
or cultural sites?
No planned construction No historic sites Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project interfere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present
landscape?
No Yes (describe)
For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item B6 directly below and
continue filling out environmental questionnaire.
6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality
a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This information is available under the NAAQS tables from the U.S. EPA
Air and Radiation Division.
Attainm ent Non-Attainm ent
O3
SOx
PM10
CO
NO2
Lead
b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits?
No Yes (describe)
c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants?
No (explain) Yes
d. Would the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source?
No Yes (describe)
e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Performance Standards?
Not Applicable No (explain) Yes
f. Would the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review?
Not applicable No (explain) Yes (describe)
g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project?
h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used?
No Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies)
i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? No emissions generated
7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water Quality
a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site?
b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project?
17. Page 5
City
c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project.
None
d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project.
No discharges to local treatment facility
e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated.
N/A
f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites?
No Yes (describe source)
g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to perform project work or site development?
No Yes (describe)
h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged?
No wastewater produced
i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water?
No Yes (describe water use and effluent impact)
j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required?
No Yes (describe)
k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater?
No Yes (describe)
8. Solid and Hazardous Wastes
a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are
defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended
purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). No waste generated
b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to perform
project work activities?
No Yes (explain)
c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished?
On-site (identify and describe location)
Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment)
d. How would wastes for disposal be transported?
N/A
e. Describe and estimate the quantity of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored
under this project.
None
f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored?
None used or produced
g. If hazardous wastes would require off-site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal) facility?
18. Page 6
Not required Arrangements not yet made Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility
(identify):
C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE
PROPOSED PROJECT.
None
IV. CERTIFICATION BY PROPOSER
I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately
below.
SIGNATURE: DATE: / /
month day year
TYPED NAME:
TITLE:
ORGANIZATION:
V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been
appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed.
PROJECT MANAGER:
SIGNATURE: DATE: / /
month day year
TYPED NAME: