Using 
choice 
experiments: 
Facilita4ng 
priority 
se6ng 
in 
provision 
of 
animal 
health 
services 
Immaculate 
Omondi1, 
3, 
Kers5n 
Zander2 
, 
Siegfried 
Bauer 
3 
and 
Isabelle 
Baltenweck1 
1Justus 
–Liebig 
University, 
Giessen, 
Germany 
2Charles 
Darwin 
University, 
Australia 
3Interna?onal 
Livestock 
Research 
Ins?tute 
(ILRI) 
Introduc?on 
September 
2014 
The 
livestock 
sector 
is 
one 
of 
the 
drivers 
of 
improved 
food 
security 
and 
livelihoods 
in 
developing 
countries. 
Livestock 
development 
in 
Africa 
is, 
however, 
constrained 
by 
animal 
diseases, 
with 
major 
economic, 
nutri?onal, 
and 
health 
consequences. 
Animal 
health 
services, 
especially 
for 
the 
poorest 
farmers, 
is 
generally 
inaccessible, 
and 
of 
poor 
quality; 
characterized 
by 
poor 
uptake 
of 
exis?ng 
control 
technologies 
i.e. 
farmer 
access. 
This 
requires 
a 
bePer 
understanding 
of 
farmer 
decision-­‐making 
when 
faced 
with 
animal 
health 
choices. 
Materials 
and 
methods 
Method: 
Discrete 
choice 
experiment, 
a 
mul?-­‐aPribute 
preference 
elici?ng 
method 
based 
on 
random 
u?lity 
theory 
and 
the 
characteris?cs 
theory 
of 
value. 
Data: 
Collected 
from 
300 
dairy 
farm 
households 
in 
Nandi 
District, 
Kenya 
(milk-­‐shed) 
in 
three 
East 
African 
Dairy 
Development 
Project 
(EADD) 
sites. 
Analysed 
the 
data 
using: 
1) 
Basic 
Random 
Parameter 
Logit 
(RPL) 
model 
2) 
RPL 
with 
interac?on 
effects 
-­‐ 
to 
account 
for 
sources 
of 
preference 
heterogeneity 
EADD 
project 
aims 
at 
improving 
dairy 
produc?on 
and 
increasing 
farmers 
incomes 
in 
East 
Africa 
through 
integrated 
interven?ons 
along 
the 
dairy 
value 
chain 
that 
are 
centered 
around 
‘dairy 
hubs’. 
Dairy 
farmers 
prefer 
to 
have 
animal 
services 
offered 
rather 
than 
having 
no 
service. 
Influenced 
by: 
Dairy 
farmers 
aPach 
different 
values 
to 
different 
animal 
health 
service 
characteris?cs. 
By 
quan?fying 
the 
welfare 
impacts 
of 
the 
preferred 
animal 
health 
service 
characteris?cs, 
the 
findings 
of 
the 
study 
can: 
• Inform 
the 
design 
and 
delivery 
of 
high 
quality 
and 
cost-­‐effec?ve 
animal 
health 
services 
• Guide 
the 
design 
and 
delivery 
of 
animal 
health 
services 
on 
the 
characteris?cs 
to 
priori?ze, 
in 
cases 
of 
resource 
constraints 
Immaculate 
Omondi 
i.omondi@cgiar.org 
● 
P.O. 
Box 
30709-­‐00100 
Nairobi, 
Kenya 
● 
+254 
20 
422 
3000 
● 
www.ilri.org 
Acknowledgements: 
Interna?onal 
Livestock 
Research 
Ins?tute 
(ILRI) 
and 
the 
German 
Academic 
Exchange 
Services 
(DAAD) 
Funding: 
Interna?onal 
Livestock 
Research 
Ins?tute 
(ILRI) 
and 
the 
German 
Academic 
Exchange 
Services 
(DAAD) 
This 
document 
is 
licensed 
for 
use 
under 
a 
Crea?ve 
Commons 
APribu?on 
–Non 
commercial-­‐Share 
Alike 
3.0 
Unported 
License 
September 
2014 
Results 
Research 
into 
use 
Figure 
1: 
Map 
of 
Kenya 
showing 
study 
sites 
In 
order 
of 
priority, 
the 
farmers 
prefer 
animal 
health 
services 
that: 
1. 
Are 
offered 
alongside 
training 
on 
animal 
husbandry 
2. 
Are 
accompanied 
by 
follow-­‐ups 
on 
animal 
health 
afer 
treatment 
3. 
Are 
accompanied 
by 
follow-­‐ups 
vaccina?on 
and 
deworming 
of 
animals 
4. 
Are 
offered 
by 
dairy 
hubs 
5. 
Have 
a 
flexible 
payment 
system 
(cash 
and 
check-­‐off) 
• Group 
membership 
in 
a 
producer 
organiza?on 
• Volume 
of 
marketed 
output 
(milk) 
Photos: 
ILRI 
Photo: 
EADD 
PROJECT 
Farmer-­‐owned 
collec?ve 
marke?ng 
system 
that 
enhance 
farmer 
access 
to 
milk 
markets 
and 
dairy-­‐related 
services 
(including 
animal 
health 
services) 
.

Using choice experiments: Facilitating priority setting in provision of animal health services

  • 1.
    Using choice experiments: Facilita4ng priority se6ng in provision of animal health services Immaculate Omondi1, 3, Kers5n Zander2 , Siegfried Bauer 3 and Isabelle Baltenweck1 1Justus –Liebig University, Giessen, Germany 2Charles Darwin University, Australia 3Interna?onal Livestock Research Ins?tute (ILRI) Introduc?on September 2014 The livestock sector is one of the drivers of improved food security and livelihoods in developing countries. Livestock development in Africa is, however, constrained by animal diseases, with major economic, nutri?onal, and health consequences. Animal health services, especially for the poorest farmers, is generally inaccessible, and of poor quality; characterized by poor uptake of exis?ng control technologies i.e. farmer access. This requires a bePer understanding of farmer decision-­‐making when faced with animal health choices. Materials and methods Method: Discrete choice experiment, a mul?-­‐aPribute preference elici?ng method based on random u?lity theory and the characteris?cs theory of value. Data: Collected from 300 dairy farm households in Nandi District, Kenya (milk-­‐shed) in three East African Dairy Development Project (EADD) sites. Analysed the data using: 1) Basic Random Parameter Logit (RPL) model 2) RPL with interac?on effects -­‐ to account for sources of preference heterogeneity EADD project aims at improving dairy produc?on and increasing farmers incomes in East Africa through integrated interven?ons along the dairy value chain that are centered around ‘dairy hubs’. Dairy farmers prefer to have animal services offered rather than having no service. Influenced by: Dairy farmers aPach different values to different animal health service characteris?cs. By quan?fying the welfare impacts of the preferred animal health service characteris?cs, the findings of the study can: • Inform the design and delivery of high quality and cost-­‐effec?ve animal health services • Guide the design and delivery of animal health services on the characteris?cs to priori?ze, in cases of resource constraints Immaculate Omondi i.omondi@cgiar.org ● P.O. Box 30709-­‐00100 Nairobi, Kenya ● +254 20 422 3000 ● www.ilri.org Acknowledgements: Interna?onal Livestock Research Ins?tute (ILRI) and the German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) Funding: Interna?onal Livestock Research Ins?tute (ILRI) and the German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) This document is licensed for use under a Crea?ve Commons APribu?on –Non commercial-­‐Share Alike 3.0 Unported License September 2014 Results Research into use Figure 1: Map of Kenya showing study sites In order of priority, the farmers prefer animal health services that: 1. Are offered alongside training on animal husbandry 2. Are accompanied by follow-­‐ups on animal health afer treatment 3. Are accompanied by follow-­‐ups vaccina?on and deworming of animals 4. Are offered by dairy hubs 5. Have a flexible payment system (cash and check-­‐off) • Group membership in a producer organiza?on • Volume of marketed output (milk) Photos: ILRI Photo: EADD PROJECT Farmer-­‐owned collec?ve marke?ng system that enhance farmer access to milk markets and dairy-­‐related services (including animal health services) .